DOCSLIB.ORG

Copertina Valutazione DEF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copertina Valutazione DEF Office IX DGCS Evaluation Unit Macedonia, Cities of Stip and Prilep: Improving the quality of life of Roma and promoting integration INSERIRE UNA FOTOGRAFIA RAPPRESENTATIVA DEL PROGETTO 2013 EVALUATION Evaluation-Macedonia, Cities of Stip and Prilep Document prepared by: Serena Rossignoli and Annarosa Mezzasalma, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna 1 Evaluation-Macedonia, Cities of Stip and Prilep Acknowledgments The contents of this report are the product of the work of the team selected by the Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna. Overall scientific supervision and internal quality control were insured by Professor Andrea de Guttry of the Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna. Although not formally part of the evaluation team, two additional persons contributed to the work and deserve to be thanked herein: Dr. Daniel Carpita, who contributed substantially to the analysis of the data and Dr. Ilija Talev, who, with local expertise, supported the team during the data collection in Macedonia. Special thanks must also be extended to the staff of COSV, and in particular to Goce Bogoevski and Alessandro Botta, who, although not directly involved in the implementation of the evaluated project, supported the organization and implementation of the evaluation field mission with professionalism and sincerity. Finally, we would like to thank all those who kindly agreed to be interviewed during the mission, and who provided important information and key details on the project intervention which were essential in the formulation of this report. We would also like to extend our sincere thanks to the Italian Ambassador in Macedonia, for his kind availability and willingness to receive and support the evaluation team during the mission in the field. 2 Evaluation-Macedonia, Cities of Stip and Prilep Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ 5 List of Tables and Figures .................................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Objectives and Scope of the Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 10 Project Context ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Project Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... 17 Evaluation Questions ................................................................................................................................... 18 Sources of Information ................................................................................................................................ 18 Limits of the Evaluation ............................................................................................................................... 19 Evaluation Team .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Analysis of Evaluation Questions ..................................................................................................................... 21 Relevance .................................................................................................................................................... 21 1. Is the project strategy relevant?.............................................................................................................. 21 1A Do the beneficiaries feel the project is useful? ................................................................................... 21 1B Is the project strategy consistent with the needs of the beneficiaries? ............................................. 21 Efficiency.......................................................................................................................................................... 30 2. Was the project efficient? ....................................................................................................................... 30 2A Were the results achieved with the expected costs? .......................................................................... 30 2B To what extent were the inputs converted into results? .................................................................... 37 2C Was the alternative utilized the most efficient? ................................................................................. 37 2D Were the results achieved within the anticipated timeframe? .......................................................... 42 Effectiveness .................................................................................................................................................... 45 3. Is the project design valid? ...................................................................................................................... 45 3A Is there a logical and consistent connection between inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impact? .................................................................................................................................................... 45 4. To what extent were the project objectives met? .................................................................................. 47 4A What percentage of the population has access to and uses the hygiene/sanitation facilities? ........ 47 4B Is the drainage canal consistently clean? ........................................................................................... 48 4C Did the population participate in the cleaning of the canal? ............................................................. 49 3 Evaluation-Macedonia, Cities of Stip and Prilep 4D Has the presence of the paved road improved the image of the neighbourhood in terms of health and cleanliness? ....................................................................................................................................... 50 4E Has paving the road facilitated movements between Trizla 1 and Trizla 2? ...................................... 50 4F To what extent there has been an increase in school attendance among children targeted by the project? .................................................................................................................................................... 50 4G To what extent have primary school dropout rates decreased for targeted children within the entire schooling path? ........................................................................................................................................ 53 4H Are Roma and non-Roma organizing communal cultural activities? ................................................. 55 4I Are Roma and non-Roma communities participating in the activities of the Multicultural Centres? . 55 Impact .............................................................................................................................................................. 59 5. What was the impact of the project intervention? ................................................................................. 59 5A Has the project contributed to the reduction of diseases linked to poor personal hygiene in Stip? .. 59 5B Has the project contributed to the reduction of diseases linked to poor personal hygiene in Prilep? 59 5C Has the population of Prilep contributed to environmental care in the neighbourhood, in addition to the other project activities? ..................................................................................................................... 59 5D Has there been a % increase in the education of Roma in Prilep and Stip as a direct consequence of the project? .............................................................................................................................................. 60 5E Has the project contributed to greater integration between Roma and non-Roma in the target areas? ...................................................................................................................................................... 63 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................................... 65 6. To what extent do the benefits of the project continue beyond the project’s life? ................................. 65 6A Has the project adopted a management system for the maintenance of the services established (hygiene and sanitation, cleaning the canal, pavement of the road, MCCs, parallel classes,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep
    Journal of Earth Science and Engineering 3 (2013) 569-581 D DAVID PUBLISHING Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep Cane Koteski, Dushko Josheski, Zlatko Jakovlev, Snezana Bardarova and Vladimir Kitanov Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delchev University of Shtip, Gevgelija 1480, Republic of Macedonia Received: June 15, 2013/Accepted: July 20, 2013/Published: August 25, 2013. Abstract: In this paper it has been investigated the issue of the dynamics of the rural population in villages in the mountainous areas of the municipality of Prilep height distribution of the mountainous villages, the area size, absolute density and agrarian population in hilly-mountainous villages, the distance of the hill-mountain villages of the municipality center and institutional infrastructure hilly-mountainous areas in Prilep. Despite the demographic decline that was made in the past 45 years, the municipality and the country will have even more incentive in the coming years to invest in infrastructure to improve little very bad living conditions and foremost here we think of infrastructure, roads, water drinking, clinics, veterinary stations, public transportation, gas stations, stores, construction of ethnic restaurants and small hotels so that at least the older generations of the cities as the least retirement to spend at home, to create minimum conditions for living and so that villages in hilly and mountainous villages to be attractive to younger generations of the cities and migrant workers from European countries and America Australia frequently to visit home, and to be able to invest in small commercial buildings in the area of tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Third International Climate Change Conference
    AGENDA Third International Climate Change Conference Start End AGENDA 02.02.2017 Early Registration 18:00 21:00 (FON University lobby) 03.02.2017 Breakfast 8:00 9:00 (University campus dining area) – Only for early arrivals Registration 11:00 12:30 (Lobby) Official Conference Opening Keynote Speakers: Rector of FON University – PhD Nano Ruzin Minister of Environment and Physical Planning (MOEPP) - Bashkim Ameti (TBC) 13:00 13:45 USAID/Macedonia Mission Director - Mr. James Stein Chief of Party of USAID MCCSP and Executive Director of Milieukontakt Macedonia - Igor Slavkoski (FON Amphitheatre) 13:45 14:05 Video presentation 14:05 14:30 Reception (Lobby) USAID MCCSP - Results and Achievements Keynote Speakers: Mr. Igor Slavkoski-Chief of Party of MCCSP and Executive director of MKM Mr. Toni Zatkoski – Mayor of Krivogastani municipality Mr. Igor Poposki – Mayor of Pehcevo municipality Mr. Isen Asani – Mayor of Tearce municipality 14:30 15:30 Mrs. Anastasija Olumcheva – Mayor of Bogdanci municipality Mr. Emil Doncev – Mayor of Vinica municipality Mr. Hazbi Idrizi - Mayor of Bogovinje municipality Mr. Mukrem Mehmedi – Mayor of Mavrovo Rostushe municipality Mr. Azem Sadiki – Mayor of Studenicani municipality Mr. Darko Sehtanski – Mayor of Delcevo municipality Mr. Marjan Risteski – Mayor of Prilep municipality 15:30 15:45 Coffee Break (Lobby) Macedonia and obligations post Paris and Marrakech COP22 Keynote Speaker: 15:45 17:00 Ms. Teodora Obradovic Grncarovska – MOEPP, National UNFCCC Focal Point 17:00 End of Day 1 18:00 19:00 Dinner - University
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Report by the EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE and National Roma Centrum, CONCERNING Macedonia
    parallel report BY THE EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE and National Roma ceNtrum, CONCERNING macedonia To the Human Rights Council, within its Universal Periodic Review, for consideration at its 18th session (January-February 2014) CHAllENGING Discrimination Promoting EqUAlITY table of contents Introduction 3 Anti-Discrimination 3 Access to Education 4 Employment 6 Freedom and Movement 7 Violence and Hate Speech 8 Recommendations 9 2 IntroductIon The European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) and National Roma Centrum (NRC) submit this parallel report to the Human Rights Council commenting on the second periodic review of Macedonia. This report highlights some of the key human rights concerns for Roma in Macedonia, based on permanent monitoring by the ERRC and NRC of the human rights situation of Roma in the country. The issues raised in this report implicate Mac- edonia’s obligations under the following human rights laws: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Convention on the Elimina- tion of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, International Convention on the Rights of the Child. antI-dIscrIMInatIon laW The Law for Prevention and Protection against Discrimination (LPPD) was adopted on 8 February 2010, and came into force in January 2011.1 The law provoked controversy, as some legal experts claimed that it is not in compliance with EU law, due to the fact that sexual orientation was not explicitly included as a possible ground for discrimination.2 Furthermore, there are other issues of non-compliance with the EU Racial Equality Directive and the Employment Equality Directive, such the use of statistics as evidence in indirect discrimination cases and the fact that the capacity of associations to bring an action is limited to judicial procedures only and the collec- tive interest of certain groups (the group s are not specified by the law).
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed, Macedonia
    293 A summary of the environmental and socio-economic characteristics of the Crna Reka (Crna River) watershed, Macedonia Zoran Spirkovski Trajce Talevski Dusica Ilik-Boeva Goce Kostoski Odd Terje Sandlund NINA Publications NINA Report (NINA Rapport) This is a new, electronic series beginning in 2005, which replaces the earlier series NINA commis- sioned reports and NINA project reports. This will be NINA’s usual form of reporting completed re- search, monitoring or review work to clients. In addition, the series will include much of the insti- tute’s other reporting, for example from seminars and conferences, results of internal research and review work and literature studies, etc. NINA report may also be issued in a second language where appropriate. NINA Special Report (NINA Temahefte) As the name suggests, special reports deal with special subjects. Special reports are produced as required and the series ranges widely: from systematic identification keys to information on impor- tant problem areas in society. NINA special reports are usually given a popular scientific form with more weight on illustrations than a NINA report. NINA Factsheet (NINA Fakta) Factsheets have as their goal to make NINA’s research results quickly and easily accessible to the general public. The are sent to the press, civil society organisations, nature management at all lev- els, politicians, and other special interests. Fact sheets give a short presentation of some of our most important research themes. Other publishing In addition to reporting in NINA’s own series, the institute’s employees publish a large proportion of their scientific results in international journals, popular science books and magazines.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Report on Vocational Education and Training For
    Report endorsed by the CAHROM through written procedure CAHROM (2016)8 2 September 2016 AD HOC COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON ROMA AND TRAVELLER ISSUES1 (CAHROM) __________ THEMATIC REPORT BY THE GROUP OF EXPERTS ON VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOR ROMA (following the CAHROM thematic visit to Cracow, Poland, on 26-28 November 2015) __________ POLAND (requesting country) Ms Agnieszka GAJEWSKA, Chief Specialist, Department of Denominations and National and Ethnic Minorities, Ministry of Administration and Digitization BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (partner country) Ms Ljiljana ŠANTIČ, Expert Advisor for Roma, Ministry for Human Rights and Refugees FINLAND (partner country) Ms Mervi SUMMANEN, Planner, AIKOPA-Kajaani University of Applied Sciences Mr Rickhard LÅNGSTRÖM, Roma expert, Roma Working Group of the City of Kajaani “THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA” (partner country) Ms Mabera KAMBERI, Head of the Sector for Coordination and Technical Assistance, Ministry of Labour and Social Policy TURKEY (partner country)2 Mr Can ALKAN, Employment Expert, Turkish Employment Agency (İŞKUR), Foreign Relations and Projects Department, International Relations Team Ms Latife USLU, Assistant Expert, Department of Social lnclusion, Ministry of Family and Social Policies 1 The terms “Roma and Travellers” are used at the Council of Europe to encompass the wide diversity of the groups covered by the work of the Council of Europe in this field: on the one hand a) Roma, Sinti/Manush, Calé, Kaale, Romanichals, Boyash/Rudari; b) Balkan Egyptians (Egyptians and Ashkali); c) Eastern groups (Dom, Lom and Abdal); and, on the other hand, groups such as Travellers, Yenish, and the populations designated under the administrative term “Gens du voyage”, as well as persons who identify themselves as Gypsies.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 4 (1/2020)
    Vol. 4 (1/2020) Skopje, North Macedonia Vol.4 (1/2020) Editor in Chief: Aziz Pollozhani, PhD (Republic of North Macedonia) Editors: Robert Pichler, PhD (Austria) Iraj Hashi, PhD (England) Rizvan Sulejmani, PhD (Republic of North Macedonia) Quirico Migheli, PhD (Italy) Iraj Hashi, PhD (England) Zoran Popovski, PhD (Republic of North Macedonia) Mimoza Dushi, PhD (Republic of Kosovo) Bekim Fetaji, PhD (Republic of North Macedonia) Olga Popovska, PhD (Republic of North Macedonia) Publisher: Mother Teresa University in Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia Editorial Board Alfonso Vargas Sanchez, PhD (Spain) Nezir Kraki, PhD (France) M. M. Sulphey, PhD (India) Marc Hill, PhD (Austria) Andrea Maliqari, PhD (Albania) Inge Hutter, PhD (Netherland) Gëzim Karapici, PhD (Albania) Yavuz Emre Arslan, PhD (Turkey) Agni Dika, PhD (Kosovo) Ayhan Oral, PhD (Turkey) Sermin Senturan, PhD (Turkey) Valentina Gogovska, PhD (North Macedonia) Mirko Perano, PhD (Italy) Anton Stoilov, PhD (Bulgaria) Salvatore Rubino, PhD (Italy) Afrim Hamidi, PhD (North Macedonia) Ruzhdi Sefa, PhD (Kosovo) Mehmed Ganic, PhD (Bosnia and Hercegovina) Sani Demiri, PhD (North Macedonia) Bashkim Ziberi, PhD (North Macedonia) Agim Mamuti, PhD (North Macedonia) Mesut Idriz, PhD (Bosnia and Hercegovina) Kalman Mizsei, PhD (Hungary) Zoran Trifunov, PhD (North Macedonia) Shaban Buza, PhD (Kosovo) Isak Idrizi, PhD (North Macedonia) Fiona Todhri, PhD (Albania) 3 South East European Journal of Managing Editors: Sani Demiri, PhD Sustainable Development Olga Popovska, PhD Technical Editing/Layout: Besnik Hamiti, ISSN (print) 2545-4463 Korab Ballanca ISSN (online) 2545-4471 Editorial Office: South East European is published twice a year. Journal of Sustainable Development Account No. 160016267778815 723019 - 45 Mother Teresa University in Skopje, Tax No.
    [Show full text]
  • 02Noemvriglasilo.Pdf
    Po~ituvani, Të nderuar, Na 19 noewvi, pakovodstvoto na ZELS odp`a spedba so Aw- Më 19 nëntor, kryesia e BNJVL mbajti takim me Am- basadopot na SAD, vo Republika Makedonija N.E Filip Rik- basadorin e SHBA në Republikën e Maqedonisë, E. I. ep. Na spedbata na koja u~estvuvaa ppetsedatelot na ZELS Filip Riker. Në takim në të cilin morrën pjesë kryetari Koce Tpajanovski, kako i potppetsedatelite Nevzat Bejta i BNJVL Koce Trajanovski, si dhe nlnkryetarët Nevzat i Qubowip Janev, be{e potencipano deka ppocesot na de- Bejta dhe Ljubomir Janev, ishte potencuar që proce- centpalizacija nappeduvai pokpaj ppoblewite so koi pealno si i decentralizimit përparon edhe krahas propblemeve se soo~uva, we|u dpugoto i kako pezultat na podp{kata {to me te cilat ballafaqohet realisht, mes tjerash edhe si ZELS ja dobiva od Ppogpawata za pazvoj na Awepikanskata rezultat i përkrahjes të cilën BNJVL e fiton nga Pro- Vlada (YSAID). Vo wowentov ZELS pealizipa eden wnogu va`en grami për zhvillim të Qeverisë Amerikane (USAID). Për ppoekt za op{tinite zaedno so YSAID-,,Baza na podatoci momentin BNJVL realizon një projekt me rëndërsi të za kpeipawe na adekvatni i tewelni finansiski analizi,, madhe për komunat së bashku me USAID ,,Baza e të so {to }e se dobie jasna slika za postoe~kiot sistew za fi- dhënave për krijimin të analizave fianciare adekuate nansipawe na op{tinite. Awbasadopot Rikep od svoja dhe themelore”, me çka do të fitohet fotografi e qartë stpana izpazi zadovolstvo od faktot deka ZELS e për sistemin egzistues për financim të komunave. Am- isklu~itelen ppiwep kade vladee edinstvo nad paptiskite basadori Riker nga ana e tij shprehi kënaqësi nga fak- intepesi.
    [Show full text]
  • Changenow 2020 Solutions F
    Solutions for Cities and Regions Booklet Program for City and Region representatives January 31st 2020 Paris, Grand Palais Program for City and Region representatives January 31st 2020 Paris, Grand Palais 2 Solutions for Cities and Regions Booklet Program for City and Region representatives January 31st 2020 Paris, Grand Palais Content City of L’Aquila (Italy) ......................................................................................................... 4 City of Breda (Netherlands) ............................................................................................ 6 City of Budapest, 19th district (Hungary) ................................................................. 8 City of Dakar (Senegal) .................................................................................................. 10 City of Deinze (Belgium) ................................................................................................ 12 City of Dobrich (Bulgaria) ............................................................................................... 14 City of Elche - Elx (Spain) ............................................................................................. 16 City of Helsinki (Finland) ................................................................................................ 18 City of Kinshasa (Democratic Republic of the Congo) ................................... 19 City of Lahti (Finland) ....................................................................................................... 21 City
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Local Road Network Project in Republic of Macedonia (VII Tender) (Final Draft)
    Environmental Impact Assessment Report for the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Local Road Network Project in Republic of Macedonia (VII tender) REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA PUBLIC ENTERPRICE FOR STATE ROADS Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Local Road Network Project in Republic of Macedonia (VII tender) (Final draft) Skopje, August 2014 CEI Makedonija AD, Skopje 1 Environmental Impact Assessment Report for the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Local Road Network Project in Republic of Macedonia (VII tender) CONTENTS 1. GENERAL DATA ..................................................................................................... 4 2. TYPE OF REPORT .................................................................................................. 4 3. AGENCY AUTHORIZED FOR APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT ................................................................................................ 5 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ......................................................................... 6 4.1. LOCATION DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................8 4.2.TECHNICAL – TECHNOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITY .............................................................. 10 4.3 RAW MATERIALS AND ADDITIONAL MATERIALS ..................................................................................... 97 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AROUND PROJECTS’
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL Report : 2007 / Foundation Open Society Institute - Macedonia ; [Editor Violeta Gligorovska]
    1 002 Publisher: Foundation Open Society Institute - Macedonia Bul. Jane Sandanski 111, POB 378 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia Tel. ++3892 2444-488 Fax: ++3892 2444-499 E-mail: [email protected] www.soros.org.mk For the publisher: Vladimir Milcin Editor: Violeta Gligoroska Proof Reading: Abakus, Skopje Design, Layout & Print: Koma, Skopje Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, 2009 Print run: 500 ISBN 978-9989-185-88-5 CIP - Katalogizacija vo publikacija Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka ”Sv. Kliment Ohridski”, Skopje 061.27(497.7)”2007”(047) ANNUAL report : 2007 / Foundation Open Society Institute - Macedonia ; [editor Violeta Gligorovska]. - Skopje : Foundation Open Society Institute Macedonia, 2009. - 170str. : tabeli ; 19 sm fusnoti kon tekstot ISBN 978-9989-185-88-5 a) Fondacija Institut otvoreno op{testvo Makedonija - 2007 - Makedonija - Izve{tai COBISS.MK-ID 77511178 Printed on recycled paper 2 3 004 CONTENTS Contacts and Organizational Set-up 6 Partners and Donors 12 Foreword 18 Education Program 22 East-East Program 32 Information Program 40 Public Health Program 46 Economic Reform Program 54 Media Program 62 Public Administration and Local Government Reform Program 70 Law Program 78 Civil Society Program 86 Spin-Off Organizations 102 Financial Report 108 Financial Statements 136 006 CONTACTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL SET-UP 6 CONTACTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL SET-UP Foundation Open Society Institute – Macedonia (FOSIM) Blvd. Jane Sandanski 111, Skopje POB 378 Republic of Macedonia Tel. ++3892/ 2444-488; Fax ++3892/2444-499, [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Leptoglossus Occidentalis (Heteroptera: Coreidae) and Harmonia Axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Two New Invasive Alien Species for Insect Fauna of Macedonia
    Correspondence ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.biotaxa.org/em Leptoglossus occidentalis (Heteroptera: Coreidae) and Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), two new invasive alien species for insect fauna of Macedonia DEJAN KULIJER National Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Zmaja od Bosne 3, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. E-mail: [email protected] Received 5 January 2016 │ Accepted 16 January 2016 │ Published online 18 January 2016. The dispersal of organisms is an important natural process for the distribution of life on Earth and represents one of the drivers of evolution. Natural dispersal is limited by multiple barriers, among which biogeographical ones are the most evident. Growing mobility of people and their goods helped species to overcome these barriers. Globalization connected all parts of the world and as a consequence, intentionally and unintentionally, humans distributed thousands of species worldwide (McNeely et al. 2001; Nentwig 2007). Generally, most of alien species are not able to adapt to new environment, but there is a small number of successful ones that when introduced to new habitats establish large populations and become threat to native biodiversity and natural ecosystems (Nentwig 2007; Rabitsch 2008). Two of very successful invasive insect species introduced in Europe are Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann, 1910 and Harmonia axyridis (Pallas, 1773). The western conifer seed bug, (Leptoglossus occidentalis), is native to the western areas of North America, from British Columbia to Mexico (McPherson et al. 1990). The first European record dates from 1999 when the species was discovered near Vicenza in northern Italy (Taylor et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Poverty and Social Exclusion 2011
    Of REPORT ON POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION REPORTIN THE ON REPUBLIC POVERTY OF AND MACEDONIA SOCIALFOR 2011EXCLUSION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA FOR 2011 financed by: REPORT ON POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA FOR 2011 Skopje, 2012 Publisher Macedonian Platform against Poverty Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights – BIM-FV Skopje The preparation and the printing of this publication is supported by The Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC) Editor Maja Gerovska Mitev, Professor (PhD) Institute for Social Work and Social Policy, Faculty of Philosophy, Skopje Project Social Inclusion and Human Rights in Macedonia Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights Skopje (BIM-FV Skopje) Veljko Vlahovik 1a 1/4 1000 Skopje Phone num: +389 (0)2 3216 956 Fax: +389 (0)2 3216 982 Support Team of BIM-FV Skopje Tatjana Stoimenovska –Project Manager Stojan Misev – Human Rights Advisor Ninoslav Mladenovik (MA) - Human Rights Advisor Jagoda Iljov – Administrative Assistant Translated from Macedonian into English by Svetlana Spasovska The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC) In using data from this publication, please quote source: Report on Poverty and Social Exclusion in the Republic of Macedonia for 2011, June 2012 Data on the authors of the chapters: Maja Gerovska Mitev (PhD) is a Associate Professor at the Institute of Social Work and Social Policy at the Faculty of Philosophy in Skopje. The fields of her educational, scientific and research interest include: social policy, social inclusion, comparative social policy, global social policy and social policy of the European Union.
    [Show full text]