Criminals, Cops, and Politicians: the Dynamics of Drug Violence in Colombia And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Criminals, Cops, and Politicians: the Dynamics of Drug Violence in Colombia And Criminals, Cops, and Politicians: The Dynamics of Drug Violence in Colombia and Mexico A dissertation presented by Angélica Durán-Martínez B.A. in Political Science, Universidad Nacional de Colombia M.A. in Latin American and Caribbean Studies, New York University To the Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2013 © Copyright 2013 by Angélica Durán-Martínez All rights reserved ii This dissertation by Angelica Duran-Martinez is accepted in its present form by the Department of Political Science as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date ___________ __________________________________ Richard O. Snyder, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date ___________ __________________________________ Peter Andreas, Reader Date ___________ __________________________________ Pauline Jones-Luong, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date ___________ __________________________________ Peter Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii Curriculum Vitae Angelica Duran-Martinez was born in Bogotá, Colombia, on May 14, 1979. She obtained a B.A. in Political Science from Universidad Nacional de Colombia and completed an M.A. in Latin American and Caribbean Studies at New York University thanks to a Fulbright Scholarship. She has been a Fulbright Fellow at the United Nations Secretariat and a consultant for the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, the UN Development Program, and Global Integrity. In Colombia she worked for the Foundation Ideas for Peace (FIP) and for several research projects about the armed conflict. Her dissertation research received funding from the Jennings Randolph Peace Scholarship of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP), the International Dissertation Research Fellowship of the Social Science Research Council (IDRF-SSRC), and the Drugs, Security, and Democracy Fellowship of the SSRC, Open Society Foundation, and IDRC. Her research also received support from the Graduate Program in Development, the Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies, the Graduate School, and the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University. She has authored “Presidents, Parties and Referenda in Latin America”, (Comparative Political Studies, 2012) and coauthored "Does illegality breed violence?: Drug trafficking and state-sponsored protection rackets" with Richard Snyder (Crime, Law and Social Change, 2009). She has also coauthored “The politics of drugs and illicit trade in the Americas” with Peter Andreas, in Kingstone and Yashar, eds., Handbook of Latin American Politics, Routledge (2012). iv Acknowledgements In 1989, when I was 10 years old, I was walking with my mom two blocks away from our home in Bogotá, and a bomb went off at a nearby mechanic shop. It was the time of the narcoterrorist terror. Only a few seconds saved us from being victims of that bomb. As people rushed into the scene, my mom ran away in the opposite direction, confused, scared, and thankful that we were safe. That was my closest experience to violence while growing up; living in Bogotá, I was relatively protected from the violence that besieged other rural areas, but in that period narcoterrorism overwhelmed the major cities of Colombia. Over the years, I have come to believe that such experience generated my interest in the topic of violence, drug trafficking, and crime. However, such interest would have never been materialized without years of discussion, mentoring, support, and valuable teachings, both at the core of family discussions, and during my years studying Political Science at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Thus it would be impossible for me to thank appropriately all the people that have been crucial in my intellectual formation, and thus, essential for the successful completion of this project. I have to limit for those who directly contributed to making this project possible. Since I started a Ph.D. at Brown, the intellectual guidance and personal support of Richard Snyder, Pauline Jones Luong, and Peter Andreas were crucial both in crafting out my research proposal, and in producing the dissertation. As the chair of my dissertation committee, Richard went out of his way to mentor me, and a combination of encouragement and thoughtful criticism always pushed me in new directions and forced v me out of my comfort zones. Peter always posed sharp questions that illuminated all the crucial holes in my thinking and thus encouraged me to sharpen ideas, to be careful with words, and to think broadly. Pauline’s comments always forced me to reflect on crucial methodological questions, on broader theoretical debates, and on key conceptual dilemmas. Barbara Stallings has provided feedback over the years and supported my project. My special thanks also go to Melani Cammett, Matthew Guttman, Kay Warren, and the entire faculty at Brown that at different points encouraged my work. I spent 15 months conducting fieldwork in Colombia and Mexico, and before the project actually took shape I carried out short trips to Cali, Medellin and Mexico City. All these trips were possible thanks to the generous funding from the United States Institute of Peace USIP, the Social Science Research Council SSRC, the Drugs, Security, and Democracy DSD Fellowship of the SSRC, Open Society and IDRC, and grants from the Graduate Development Program, the Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies, and the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University. This research would have not been possible without the generosity of those who shared their time, thoughts, and experiences with me while I was in the field. I cannot thank all of them directly because of anonymity concerns, but every person who shared experiences with me made this project what it is today. I am forever indebted to Maria Eugenia and Lucila in Medellin; Mireya and Blanca in Cali; Luz Maria, Pedro, and Pedro Pablo in Culiacan; Alan and Laura in Ciudad Juarez, who generously opened the doors of their houses and their hearts for me, and became a family in each of my research locations, making me feel safer and welcomed. Luis Astorga, both an intellectual guide and a friend, graciously introduced me to his family and provided key contacts and vi insights. My special thanks go to Angelika Rettberg at the Universidad de los Andes in Bogotá, Arturo Alvarado at Colmex in Mexico City, Alberto Hernandez at COLEF, Mauricio Romero at the Universidad Javeriana in Bogotá, Roddy Brett at the time at the Universidad del Rosario, and David Shirk at the Transborder Institute at the University of San Diego, for having provided key institutional support and space for me to share the preliminary findings of my research while in the field. The research assistance of Mundo Ramirez, Rocio Duran, and Luis Cañas was invaluable, thanks to them for their hard work, insights and patience to go through hundreds of news papers, in most cases dusty records, to create the dataset on drug violence. The work I present here reflects the knowledge that all my interviewees shared, and many discussions with friends and colleagues. The usual disclaimer is always necessary that my omissions are my sole responsibility. Colleagues at fellowship workshops with USIP, SSRC, and the DSD program, provided crucial insights, criticisms, and encouragement at different stages of the project. The intellectual community of the DSD program was essential in the latter part of fieldwork and has remained a highly motivating network for research on topics of security, criminality, and violence in Latin America. Special thanks go to Desmond Arias, Ana Arjona, Susan Brewer, Yanilda Gonzalez, Javier Osorio and Reynaldo Rojo for their feedback on the general ideas of this dissertation. My colleagues and friends at Brown were crucial and my special thanks go to Sinem Adar, Erin Beck, Jennifer Costanza, Susan Ellison, Eduardo Moncada, and Dikshya Thapa, who read earlier drafts of chapters and made great comments on them. Susan Hirsch and Suzanne Brough always provided essential administrative support throughout my years at Brown. vii Brown University was my intellectual home, and the friends that I made over the years became my family away from home, to all of them my special thanks because their trust and friendship made my journey special and unforgettable. I also thank my longtime friends from Universidad Nacional and New York University because they have always accompanied me, despite distance and time. Astrid, Jessica, and Paola will always be my accomplices. None of this could have ever been possible without the unconditional support of my family. Of my mom, whose endless love and trust in me keeps me going in moments of doubt, and whose sacrifices and guidance made me the person I am today. To Nancy and Rocio, my precious sisters, who never stop encouraging me, motivating me to go further, and teaching me about life. To my loving husband Jack, who came to my life when this project was just starting and has supported me through every single step of it, enduring moments of physical separation, editing chapters, inspiring me through long political conversations, reminding me about the value of my work, but also about the real important things in life. Jack you have been a light in my life and I can never express in words how grateful I am to have you in my life. Finally, to my dad, my hero, who left this world too early to see how his sacrifices pay off, but who, I am sure, still looks out for me from heaven. To them, I dedicate this dissertation. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………… v List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………….. x List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………. xi Glossary of terms and abbreviations………………………………………………… xii Chapter 1. State power, criminal competition, and drug violence: A systematic comparison between Colombian and Mexican cities………………………………… 1 Chapter 2. Silent traffickers or brutal criminals: defining and assessing the frequency and visibility of drug violence …………………………………………………………….
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.La Guerra Perdida
    El Cotidiano ISSN: 0186-1840 [email protected] Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Azcapotzalco México Dávila, Patricia La guerra perdida El Cotidiano, núm. 164, noviembre-diciembre, 2010, pp. 41-46 Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Azcapotzalco Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32515894006 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto La guerra perdida Patricia Dávila* La guerra que durante tres años ha mantenido en esta ciudad fronteriza el gobierno federal en contra del narcotráfico, sólo logró evidenciar al gobierno mexi- cano: por un lado, su ineficiencia para combatir a los grupos de narcotraficantes, y por el otro, la protección que brinda al cártel de Sinaloa y a su principal dirigente, Joaquín Guzmán Loera; sobre todo en la pelea que el poderoso capo sostiene para desplazar de la plaza a Vicente Carrillo Fuentes, líder del cártel de Juárez, quien a su vez ha contado con la protección de las autoridades locales. C iudad Juárez, Chih.- Frente a un Clinton. advirtió que “los cárteles los grupos criminales” establecidos en ejército de 10 mil soldados, policías de las drogas adquieren atributos de esta ciudad, el 28 de marzo de 2008, el federales y municipales, en esta tierra grupos terroristas e insurgentes”. entonces secretario de Gobernación, bañada con la sangre de casi siete mil Hillary Clinton definió: “México vive Juan Camilo Mouriño, puso en marcha personas, en la que impera la Ley del narcoterrorismo”.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Relationship Between Militarization in the United States
    Exploring the Relationship Between Militarization in the United States and Crime Syndicates in Mexico: A Look at the Legislative Impact on the Pace of Cartel Militarization by Tracy Lynn Maish A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Criminology and Criminal Justice) in the University of Michigan-Dearborn 2021 Master Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Maya P. Barak, Chair Associate Professor Kevin E. Early Associate Professor Donald E. Shelton Tracy Maish [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8834-4323 © Tracy L. Maish 2021 Acknowledgments The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of their committee and the impact that their guidance had on the process. Without the valuable feedback and enormous patience, this project would not the where it is today. Thank you to Dr. Maya Barak, Dr. Kevin Early, and Dr. Donald Shelton. Your academic mentorship will not be forgotten. ii Table of Contents 1. Acknowledgments ii 2. List of Tables iv 3. List of Figures v 4. Abstract vi 5. Chapter 1 Introduction 1 6. Chapter 2 The Militarization of Law Enforcement Within the United States 8 7. Chapter 3 Cartel Militarization 54 8. Chapter 4 The Look into a Mindset 73 9. Chapter 5 Research Findings 93 10. Chapter 6 Conclusion 108 11. References 112 iii List of Tables Table 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 80 Table 2 .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aasen -- Constructing Narcoterrorism As Danger.Pdf
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch Constructing Narcoterrorism as Danger: Afghanistan and the Politics of Security and Representation Aasen, D. This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © Mr Donald Aasen, 2019. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] Constructing Narcoterrorism as Danger: Afghanistan and the Politics of Security and Representation Greg Aasen A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2019 1 Abstract Afghanistan has become a country synonymous with danger. Discourses of narcotics, terrorism, and narcoterrorism have come to define the country and the current conflict. However, despite the prevalence of these dangers globally, they are seldom treated as political representations. This project theorizes danger as a political representation by deconstructing and problematizing contemporary discourses of (narco)terrorism in Afghanistan. Despite the globalisation of these two discourses of danger, (narco)terrorism remains largely under-theorised, with the focus placed on how to overcome this problem rather than critically analysing it as a representation. The argument being made here is that (narco)terrorism is not some ‘new’ existential danger, but rather reflects the hegemonic and counterhegemonic use of danger to establish authority over the collective identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2019 Activities and Funds Report for the Motor Vehicle Crime Prevention Authority
    Fiscal Year 2019 Activities and Funds Report for the Motor Vehicle Crime Prevention Authority Prepared for the Texas Legislature April 1, 2020 Texas Motor Vehicle Crime Prevention Authority Lieutenant Tommy Hansen – Presiding Officer Law Enforcement Representative Ms. Ashley Hunter Mr. Armin Mizani Insurance Representative Insurance Consumer Representative Assistant Chief Mike Rodriguez Mr. Steven C. McCraw Law Enforcement Representative Ex-Officio, Department of Public Safety Designee: Major Justin Owen Mr. Shay Gause Ms. Kit Whitehill Insurance Representative Insurance Consumer Representative MVCPA Director Bryan Wilson 512-465-4012 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................4 MVCPA at a Glance ................................................................................................................................................5 Losses to Texans from Motor Vehicle Burglary & Theft in CY 2018 .......................................................................5 Sunset Legislation (SB 604) .........................................................................................................................................6 Fee and Name Change Activities ................................................................................................................................6 FY 2019 MVCPA Activities .....................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Pandillas Y Cárteles: La Gran Alianza
    Pandillas y cárteles: La gran alianza Publicado en junio de 2010 Los cárteles mexicanos son organizaciones dinámicas con una alta capacidad de adaptación a nuevas condiciones. La lógica de la guerra que libran hoy los cárteles contra otras organizaciones criminales y contra el gobierno federal, y la lógica empresarial de expansión de mercados y elevación de ganancias, han empujado a los cárteles a dar pasos decisivos hacia su profesionalización. Uno de estos pasos es la práctica del outsourcing o subcontratación de los servicios especializados que prestan las pandillas, con las que han establecido una relación de conveniencia mutua. Alianza por conveniencia mutua Las pandillas ofrecen diversos servicios a los cárteles en el rubro de narcotráfico: transporte de mercancías, distribución y venta. De la mano con los cárteles, las pandillas también están incursionando activamente en el secuestro, la extorsión, la trata de personas, el lavado de dinero, el robo de vehículos y el tráfico de armas —delitos típicos del crimen organizado. Hay al menos cinco factores que contribuyen a que la relación intermitente entre pandillas y cárteles se convierta en una alianza duradera. El primero es la protección o reducción de riesgos de los propios cárteles. Al operar con células semiautónomas (es decir, con pandillas separadas del cártel), las dirigencias de los cárteles reducen la probabilidad de que sus organizaciones sean penetradas por informantes gubernamentales o de otros grupos criminales. Asimismo, cuando los pandilleros son arrestados por las autoridades o reclutados por cárteles adversarios, no pueden proporcionarles información sobre el modus operandi del cártel al que apoyaban porque simplemente no la poseen: han trabajado para el cártel pero fuera de él.
    [Show full text]
  • Honor-Crime in North America
    MOTORCYCLE HIT TEAM • HRT MANHUNT • LOS AZTECAS • RUSSIAN WEAPONS Journal for Law Enforcement, Intelligence & Special Operations Professionals The CounterAPRIL/MAY 2013 VOLUME 6 • NUMBER 2 HONOR-CRIME IN NORTH AMERICA INTERNATIONAL EDITION An SSI ® Publication APRIL/MAY 2013 www.thecounterterroristmag.com USA/CANADA $5.99 The Counter Terrorist ~ April/May 2013 1 Circle 2372 on The Reader Counter Service Terrorist Card ~ April/May 2013 13 Circle on Reader Service Card ~ April/May 2013 3 The Counter Terrorist340 CircleCircle 13 on onReader Reader Service Service Card Card WE’VE CREATED A MONSTER. MRAD™ 4 The Counter Terrorist ~ April/May 2013 Circle 121 on Reader Service Card The Journal for Law Enforcement, Intelligence & Special Operations Professionals APRIL/MAY 2013 Counter VOLUME 6 • NUMBER 2 COVER STORY: HONOR-CRIME IN NORTH AMERICA 32 By M. Zuhdi Jasser and Raquel Evita Saraswati FEATURES: 32 Firsthand: 8 HRT MANHUNT By James A. McGee Case Study: 20 THE MOTORCYCLE HIT TEAM: A GLOBAL TACTIC By Glenn McGovern MODERN RUSSIAN SPECIAL WEAPons 48 By Eeben Barlow 8 THE BARRIO AZTECA, LOS AZTECAS NETWORK 60 By John P. Sullivan DEPARTMENTS: 6 From the Editor Leadership 20 46 Book Review Shariah Law and American Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases 69 Innovative Products Mini-Caliber Robot, Reconyx Camera, CQB-11 72 Training Review CDG Advanced Handgun Skills 48 Cover Photo: Muslim woman. Photo: Steve Evans CONTENTS The Counter Terrorist ~ April/May 2013 5 FROM THE EDITOR: CounterThe Leadership By Chris Graham Journal for Law Enforcement, Intelligence & Special Operations Professionals VOLUME 6 • NUMBER 2 APRIL/MAY 2013 n November 5, 2009 Nidal Hasan murdered 13 soldiers and wounded 29 Editor at Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Narco-Terrorism: Could the Legislative and Prosecutorial Responses Threaten Our Civil Liberties?
    Narco-Terrorism: Could the Legislative and Prosecutorial Responses Threaten Our Civil Liberties? John E. Thomas, Jr.* Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................ 1882 II. Narco-Terrorism ......................................................................... 1885 A. History: The Buildup to Current Legislation ...................... 1885 B. Four Cases Demonstrate the Status Quo .............................. 1888 1. United States v. Corredor-Ibague ................................. 1889 2. United States v. Jiménez-Naranjo ................................. 1890 3. United States v. Mohammed.......................................... 1891 4. United States v. Khan .................................................... 1892 III. Drug-Terror Nexus: Necessary? ................................................ 1893 A. The Case History Supports the Nexus ................................. 1894 B. The Textual History Complicates the Issue ......................... 1895 C. The Statutory History Exposes Congressional Error ............ 1898 IV. Conspiracy: Legitimate? ............................................................ 1904 A. RICO Provides an Analogy ................................................. 1906 B. Public Policy Determines the Proper Result ........................ 1909 V. Hypothetical Situations with a Less Forgiving Prosecutor ......... 1911 A. Terrorist Selling Drugs to Support Terror ............................ 1911 B. Drug Dealer Using Terror to Support Drug
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela 2018 Human Rights Report
    VENEZUELA 2018 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Venezuela is formally a multiparty, constitutional republic, but for more than a decade, political power has been concentrated in a single party with an increasingly authoritarian executive exercising significant control over the legislative, judicial, citizens’ power (which includes the prosecutor general and ombudsman), and electoral branches of government. On May 20, the government organized snap presidential elections that were neither free nor fair for the 2019-25 presidential term. Nicolas Maduro was re-elected through this deeply flawed political process, which much of the opposition boycotted and the international community condemned. His illegitimate next term was scheduled to begin on January 10, 2019. The opposition gained supermajority (two-thirds) control of the National Assembly in the 2015 legislative elections. The executive branch, however, used its control over the Supreme Court (TSJ) to weaken the National Assembly’s constitutional role to legislate, ignore the separation of powers, and enable the president to govern through a series of emergency decrees. Civilian authorities maintained effective, although politicized, control over the security forces. Human rights issues included extrajudicial killings by security forces, including colectivos (government-sponsored armed groups); torture by security forces; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; and political prisoners. The government restricted free expression and the press by routinely blocking signals, and
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Deterioratin in US-Colombian Relations, 1995
    UNDERSTANTING THE DETERIORATIN IN US-COLOMBIAN RELATIONS, 1995- 1997. CONFLICT AND COOPERATION IN THE WAR AGAINST DRUGS BY ALEXANDRA GUÁQUETA M. PHIL. THEIS SOMERVILLE COLLEGE, UNIVERISTY OF OXFORD APRIL, 1998 INTRODUCTION Colombia, unlike the majority of its Latin American and Caribbean neighbours, had a remarkable record of friendly relations with the United States throughout most of the twentieth century. However, this situation changed in 1995 when the U.S. downgraded Colombia's previous status of alliance in the war against illegal drugs by granting it a conditional certification (national interest waiver) on its performance in drug control.1 The drug certification is the annual process by which the U.S. evaluates other countries' accomplishments in drug control making foreign aid conditional to their degree of cooperation. It also involves economic sanctions when cooperation is deemed unsatisfactory. In 1996 and 1997 Bill Clinton's administration decertified Colombia completely. The media reported Colombia's 'Cuba-nisation' in Washington as U.S. policy makers became obsessed with isolating the Colombian president, Ernesto Samper.2 Colombia was officially branded as a 'threat to democracy' and to the U.S.3 1 See chapter 3 for detailed explanaition of certification. 2 Expression used by journalist Henry Raymount in Washington and quoted in El Tiempo, November 6, 1996, p. 11A. 3 U.S. Department of State, Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL), International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR) 1997, Washington D.C., March 1997. p. xli. 1 Colombia and the U.S. quarrelled so severely that they perceived each other as enemies. 'Never before, had relations between the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Trabajo De Grado
    ACTUACIÓN DEL CONGRESO DE LA REPUBLICA DE COLOMBIA EN EL PERIODO PRESIDENCIAL 1994-1998, FRENTE A LA INFILTRACIÓN DE DINEROS DEL NARCOTRÁFICO EN LAS CAMPAÑAS POLÍTICAS MG. JULIÁN ESPINOSA ORTIZ [email protected] UNIVERSIDAD LA GRAN COLOMBIA FACULTAD DE DERECHO BOGOTÁ D.C. 2016 Tabla de Contenido Resumen ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Palabras Clave .............................................................................................................................. 4 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Keywords ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Introducción ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Línea de Investigación .................................................................................................................... 7 Antecedentes ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Antecedentes de la Investigación .................................................................................................. 7 Planteamiento Del Problema ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Insurgency in the Americas and Beyond
    Criminal Insurgency in the Americas and Beyond BY ROBERT KILLEBREW ven before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the global context for American secu- rity policy was changing. While the traditional state-based international system continued E to function and the United States reacted to challenges by states in conventional ways (for example, by invading Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11), a cascade of enormous technological and social change was revolutionizing international affairs. As early as the 1990s, theorists were writing that with modern transnational communications, international organizations and corporate con- glomerates would increasingly act independently of national borders and international regulation.1 What was not generally foreseen until about the time of 9/11, though, was the darker side: that the same technology could empower corrupt transnational organizations to threaten the international order itself. In fact, the globalization of crime, from piracy’s financial backers in London and Nairobi to the Taliban and Hizballah’s representatives in West Africa, may well be the most important emerging fact of today’s global security environment. Transnational crime operates on a global scale, and the criminal networks that affect national security include actors ranging from Russian mafias to expanding Asian drug-trafficking organiza- tions in U.S. cities. Without discounting their importance, this article focuses on illegal groups native to this hemisphere and particularly Latin America, those identified by the Department of Justice as posing the most significant organized criminal threat to U.S. security. Two factors related Colonel Robert Killebrew, USA (Ret.), is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security.
    [Show full text]
  • Narcotics Funded Terrorists/Extremist Groups
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF NARCOTICS-FUNDED TERRORIST AND OTHER EXTREMIST GROUPS A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with the Department of Defense May 2002 Researchers: LaVerle Berry Glenn E. Curtis Rex A. Hudson Nina A. Kollars Project Manager: Rex A. Hudson Federal Research Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540−4840 Tel: 202−707−3900 Fax: 202−707−3920 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.loc.go v/rr/frd/ Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Narcotics-Funded Terrorist/Extremist Groups PREFACE This global survey, based entirely on open sources, is intended to provide an assessment of the nexus between selected anti-U.S. terrorist and extremist groups in the world and organized crime, specifically drug trafficking, and how this relationship might be vulnerable to countermeasures. More specifically, the aim is to help develop a causal model for identifying critical nodes in terrorist and other extremist networks that can be exploited by Allied technology, just as counterdrug technology has been used in the war against drug trafficking. To this end, the four analysts involved in this study have examined connections between extremist groups and narcotics trafficking in the following countries, listed by region in order of discussion in the text: Latin America: Triborder Region (Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay), Colombia, and Peru; the Middle East: Lebanon; Southern Europe (Albania and Macedonia); Central Asia: Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan; and East Asia: Philippines. These are preliminary, not definitive, surveys. Most of the groups examined in this study have been designated foreign terrorist organizations by the U.S.
    [Show full text]