The Circle and the Cross
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Recumbent Stone Circles of Aberdeenshire
The Recumbent Stone Circles of Aberdeenshire The Recumbent Stone Circles of Aberdeenshire: Archaeology, Design, Astronomy and Methods By John Hill The Recumbent Stone Circles of Aberdeenshire: Archaeology, Design, Astronomy and Methods By John Hill This book first published 2021 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2021 by John Hill All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-6585-8 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-6585-2 This book is dedicated to: Dr Joan J Taylor (1940-2019) Dr Aubrey Burl (1926-2020) “What was once considered on the fringe of archaeology, now becomes mainstream” and to Rocky (2009-2020) “My faithful companion who walked every step of the way with me across the Aberdeenshire landscape” TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures............................................................................................ ix List of Tables ............................................................................................ xii Acknowledgements ................................................................................. xiii Introduction ............................................................................................... -
Rude Stone Monuments Chapt
RUDE STONE MONUMENTS IN ALL COUNTRIES; THEIR AGE AND USES. BY JAMES FERGUSSON, D. C. L., F. R. S, V.P.R.A.S., F.R.I.B.A., &c, WITH TWO HUNDRED AND THIRTY-FOUR ILLUSTRATIONS. LONDON: ,JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1872. The right of Translation is reserved. PREFACE WHEN, in the year 1854, I was arranging the scheme for the ‘Handbook of Architecture,’ one chapter of about fifty pages was allotted to the Rude Stone Monuments then known. When, however, I came seriously to consult the authorities I had marked out, and to arrange my ideas preparatory to writing it, I found the whole subject in such a state of confusion and uncertainty as to be wholly unsuited for introduction into a work, the main object of which was to give a clear but succinct account of what was known and admitted with regard to the architectural styles of the world. Again, ten years afterwards, while engaged in re-writing this ‘Handbook’ as a History of Architecture,’ the same difficulties presented themselves. It is true that in the interval the Druids, with their Dracontia, had lost much of the hold they possessed on the mind of the public; but, to a great extent, they had been replaced by prehistoric myths, which, though free from their absurdity, were hardly less perplexing. The consequence was that then, as in the first instance, it would have been necessary to argue every point and defend every position. Nothing could be taken for granted, and no narrative was possible, the matter was, therefore, a second time allowed quietly to drop without being noticed. -
Session 1 Time Travel in the Peak District from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic Aims of the Session Curriculum Links Resources
Stone Age to Iron Age KS2 Session 1 Time travel in the Peak District from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic Aims of the session The aim of this session is to explore the evidence of life in the local area from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic. Gather evidence in the gallery to create a video back at school about life in the Mesolithic times. Curriculum links This session will support pupils to develop a chronologically secure knowledge and understanding of British, local and world history, establishing clear narratives within and across the periods they study. They should note connections, contrasts and trends overtime and develop the appropriate use of historical terms. They should regularly address and sometimes devise historically valid questions about change, cause, similarity and difference, and significance. They should construct informed responses that involve thoughtful selection and organisation of relevant historical information. They should understand how our knowledge of the past is constructed from a range of sources. A visit to the Wonders of the Peak gallery will contribute to both an overview and a depth study to help pupils understand both the long arc of development and complexity of specific aspects of the content. Resources Handling collection, Stone Age Boy, DK Find out series, Stone Age Stone Age to Iron Age KS2 KS2 Session 1: 12,000 to 6,000 years ago The aim of this session is to explore the evidence of life in the local area from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic. Gather evidence in the gallery to create a video back at school about life in the Mesolithic times. -
Jottings on Some of the Objects of Interest in the Stonehenge Excursion
qass Jl/\ 142,- Book 'D 7 I- I . * JOTTINGS f)\' s<)\!!" m Tijy orjF^T*^ op I INTERKST ^ON 1 : 1 1 E N G E EXC U RS 1 N n\ EDWARD T. STEVENS. F.S.A Hon. Director of tlie, Salisbury and Souin Wilts Museum, Hon. C'jratoi- • m<* IV-.rstee th<? B-ricknioie Miiseuni, ; of trrespoiiding !SFember of the Academy of Nucural Sciences of Philadelphia, Forcicp. Member of ihc Anthropological Institute of New YorT<, A ..nor of Flint CKips," &c. SALISHUKN JOTTINGS ON SOME OF THE OBJECTS OF INTEREST IN THE TONEHENGE EXCURSION. BY EDWARD T. STEVENS, F.S.A., Hon. Director of the Salisbury and South Wilts Museum, Hon. Curator and Trustee of the Blackmore Museum, :orresponding y Member of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Foreign Member of the Anthropological Institute of New York, Author of " Flint Chips," &c. I SALISBURY : BROWN & CO. LONDON : SIMPKIN, MARSHALL AND CO. 1882. V V ^^ .6 7 SALISBURY : BENNETT BROTHERS, PRINTERS, JOURNAL OFFICE. /WITHDRAWN N0Vl2:«18^ / CO^NTENTS. PAGE. Preface The Route I Traces of Early Occupation 2 Earth-works in the Route ... 2 Names of Rivers, &c., in the Route 3 Salisbury. —The Council Chamber ... 6 The Bull-ring 9 The Market-place II The " Blue Boar" 13 Ludlow and the Royalists H The City Gates 15 Events relating to Salisbury i6 Old Sarum. —General description 24 Remains of Masonry . 29 The Cathedral 30 Roman Roads to the Fortress 32 Palaeolithic Implement found there 33 Events relating to Old Sarum ... 34 Change in the name of the place 37 Removal of the Cathedral from Old Sarum 38 The Bishops of Old Sarum 39 Their remains and Tombs removed to Salisbury Cathedral 39 The Earls of Salisbury 43 The Burgh at Old Sarum 44 Represented in Parliament 44 Hour-glass stand in Stratford Church 46 Heale House. -
Reassessing the Scottish Mesolithic-Neolithic Transition: Questions of Diet and Chronology
Bownes, Jessica (2018) Reassessing the Scottish Mesolithic-Neolithic transition: questions of diet and chronology. PhD thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/8911/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] REASSESSING THE SCOTTISH MESOLITHIC- NEOLITHIC TRANSITION: QUESTIONS OF DIET AND CHRONOLOGY Jessica Bownes BA(hons), MSc, FSA Scot MARCH 24, 2018 SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SUERC | College of Science and Engineering | University of Glasgow I declare that, except where explicit reference is made to the contribution of others, that this dissertation is the result of my own work and has not been submitted for any other degree at the University of Glasgow or any other institution. Printed Name: __________________________ Signature: ______________________________ i Acknowledgements There is a long list of people I need thank for their contributions to this work. First and foremost are my supervisors, Dr Philippa Ascough, Professor Gordon Cook and Dr Iona Murray. I must also thank the AHRC and Historic Environment Scotland for funding this research. -
PR Box 3 1 Transcriptions
PR box 3 / 1 transcriptions All of the letters in this subsection have been transcribed. A full listing of all the Pitt- Rivers’ letters in the PRM is available here. All notes about aspects of the letters were also prepared by the transcriber, Alison Petch. Transcriptions and notes were prepared between January and February 2015. Please note: all of this Box 3/ 1 section are tagged together using a stationery tag through hole in top left. [Stamp: Office of Works B 6856 30 Oct 1898] [Subject] Public Buildings Estimates 1897-8 Protection of Ancient Monuments [Memoranda] General Pitt Rivers, Will you be so good as to state before the 15th, prox. what sum you consider should be provided in the Estimates for 1897-8 for this service. It has been the practice of late years to take a sum of £100 per annum [Illegible initials] 30 Oct 96 [Different handwriting, if it is Pitt-Rivers’ it is much neater than usual] Since 1891 the Ancient Monuments Act has been virtually in abeyance, in consequence of the decision of the Board of Works, that I should no longer endeavour to obtain fresh monuments, but that “the Act being permissive the attitude of the Government should be passive.” If this working of the Act is still considered satisfactory, I see no reason why any additional sum should be noted beyond what is necessary to keep the Monuments now under the Act in good repair. I have no opinion to offer on the subject. My letter to Mr Primrose [1] of the 20th Feb 1891 sufficiently explains my views, but I think it desirable to take this opportunity of referring to the subject, in case dissatisfaction should be expressed on the part of archaeologists, and in order to show that it was not by my desire that the Act was discontinued. -
9. Bibliography for Research Agenda (Pdf)
The Archaeology of North West England Bibliography Abramson P, 2000, ‘A re-examination of a Viking Age burial at trial Archaeology Review 27(1), 113-120. Beacon Hill, Aspatria’, TTCWAAS 100, 79-88. Barnwell P S, Giles C, 1997, English farmsteads: 1750-1914. Swin- Adams M H, 1995, An archaeological evaluation at St Chad’s Church, don: RCHME. Kirkby, Knowsley, Merseyside. Liverpool Museum unpublished Barrett J, 1999a, ‘The mythical landscapes of the British Iron report. Age’, in Ashmore W & Knapp A B, (eds), Archaeologies of Abrams L & Parsons D N, 2004, ‘Place-names and the history of landscape, 253-265. Oxford: Blackwell. Scandinavian settlement in England’, in Hines J, Lane A & Barrett J, 1999b, ‘Chronologies of landscape’, in Layton R & Redknap M, (eds), Land, sea and home: proceedings of a conference Ucko P, (eds), The archaeology and anthropology of landscape, 21- on Viking age settlement, Cardiff 2001, 379-431. Leeds: Society 30. London: Routledge. Medieval Archaeology Monograph 20. Barrett J, Locker A & Roberts C, 2004, ‘The origins of intensive ADCA, 2004, Archaeological requirements for works on churches and marine fishing in medieval Europe: the English evidence’, churchyards. Association of Diocesan and Cathedral Archae- published online in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 24 Novem- ologists Guidance Note 1. ber 2004. Albarella U, 2003, ‘Tawyers, tanners, horn trade and the mystery Barrow G W S, 1969, ‘Northern English society in the Early of the missing goat’, in Murphy P & Wiltshire P E J, (eds), Middle Ages’, N.H. 4 1-28. The environmental archaeology of industry, 71-83. Oxford: Oxbow. Barter M, 2004, ‘The Diocese of Manchester: strategy, capacity Alcock L, 1972, ‘By South Cadbury is that Camelot . -
PS Signpost Bull Ring
The Bull Ring Henge Signposts to Prehistory Location: The Bull Ring (SK 0785 7823) is adjacent to the village of Dove Holes in Derbyshire, just north of Buxton. Main period: Neolithic–Bronze Age Access & ownership: The site is Scheduled. At the southern end of the village, a track leads to a children’s playground and to the henge, which lies on the far side of a playing field. Parking is available at the end of the track. The Bull Ring is a henge – a large, circular earthwork with an external bank – a type of ceremonial monument that can be dated to the late Neolithic-Chalcolithic periods. Sited on the NW edge of the Derbyshire limestone plateau, it stands at the junction of three valleys and perhaps provided an accessible meeting point or trade centre for prehistoric communities in the area. In plan and dimensions, the henge is almost identical to Arbor Low, just 17.5 km to the SW although the orientation of its entrances is different. It has an external diameter of 93–90 m, with the bank and internal ditch surrounding an oval area (Fig. 2). The rock-cut ditch measures 8–12 m across and is between 0.5 and 1m deep. Excavations in 1949 (Alcock 1950) showed that it was originally 5–6.5 m wide and between 1.2 and 2.1m deep. The surrounding bank is now about 1m high and between 9 and 11m wide; it was originally 2 m high and 5.5–7 Fig. 1. Plan with location of Trench 1 (see Fig. -
Bibliography-P-198-207
Bibliography Archaeology North West Vol 9 (issue 19 for 2007) 197 The Archaeology of North West England Bibliography Abramson P, 2000, ‘A re-examination of a Viking Age burial at trial Archaeology Review 27(1), 113-120. Beacon Hill, Aspatria’, TTCWAAS 100, 79-88. Barnwell P S, Giles C, 1997, English farmsteads: 1750-1914. Swin- Adams M H, 1995, An archaeological evaluation at St Chad’s Church, don: RCHME. Kirkby, Knowsley, Merseyside . Liverpool Museum unpublished Barrett J, 1999a, ‘The mythical landscapes of the British Iron report. Age’, in Ashmore W & Knapp A B, (eds), Archaeologies of Abrams L & Parsons D N, 2004, ‘Place-names and the history of landscape , 253-265. Oxford: Blackwell. Scandinavian settlement in England’, in Hines J, Lane A & Barrett J, 1999b, ‘Chronologies of landscape’, in Layton R & Redknap M, (eds), Land, sea and home: proceedings of a conference Ucko P, (eds), The archaeology and anthropology of landscape , 21- on Viking age settlement, Cardiff 2001 , 379-431. Leeds: Society 30. London: Routledge. Medieval Archaeology Monograph 20. Barrett J, Locker A & Roberts C, 2004, ‘The origins of intensive ADCA, 2004, Archaeological requirements for works on churches and marine fishing in medieval Europe: the English evidence’, churchyards . Association of Diocesan and Cathedral Archae- published online in Proceedings of the Royal Society B , 24 Novem- ologists Guidance Note 1. ber 2004. Albarella U, 2003, ‘Tawyers, tanners, horn trade and the mystery Barrow G W S, 1969, ‘Northern English society in the Early of the missing goat’, in Murphy P & Wiltshire P E J, (eds), Middle Ages’, N.H. 4 1-28. -
Peak Into the Past: an Archaeo-Astronomy Summer School Daniel Brown, Natasha Neale and Robert Francis
Peak into the past: an archaeo-astronomy summer school Daniel Brown, Natasha Neale and Robert Francis ABSTRACT Our landscape has been shaped by humans over millennia. It still contains many clues to how it was used in the past, giving us insights into ancient cultures and their everyday life. Our summer school uses archaeology and astronomy as a focus for effective out-of-classroom learning experiences. It demonstrates how a field trip can be used to its full potential by utilising ancient monuments as outdoor classrooms. This article shows how such a summer school can be embedded into the secondary curriculum. We provide advice, example activities and locations to visit, and outline the impact this work has had. How it all began What needed to be planned? Over recent years, initiatives have been brought The initial planning of the summer school activities forward to encourage learning outside the was supported by working closely with a core group traditional classroom environment, especially of four G&T students in the months before the in topics such as physics and mathematics. actual event. They were given the topic of ‘What These new approaches are used to illustrate is archaeo-astronomy?’ to research. Their results how science, technology, engineering and were used to assess their knowledge and initial mathematics (STEM subjects) relate to everyday misconceptions about archaeology and astronomy. life. Traditionally, locations associated with This allowed us to develop activities that were physics- and mathematics-based activities have more suited to the age group. been planetariums and science parks. National From their feedback, it soon became clear Parks and ancient monuments were related to that the larger and unique ancient monuments ecological, biological and geographic fieldwork (such as Stonehenge) were well known by the (Braund and Reiss, 2005). -
Community Archaeology
COMMUNITY ARCHAEOLOGY THEMES, METHODS AND PRACTICES Edited by Gabriel Moshenska and Sarah Dhanjal Oxbow Books Oxford and Oakville Published by Oxbow Books, Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford, UK © Oxbow Books and the individual authors 2011 Gabriel Moshenska, Sarah Dhanjal and the individual contributors 2011 ISBN 978-1-84217-432-6 A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library !is book is available direct from Oxbow Books, Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford OX2 2EW (Phone: 01865-241249; Fax: 01865-794449) and !e David Brown Book Company PO Box 511, Oakville, CT 06779, USA (Phone: 860-945-9329; Fax: 860-945-9468) or via our website www.oxbowbooks.com Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cover image: Participatory excavation at Hinkshay, Telford, Shropshire. Image and copyright Paul Belford. Printed in Great Britain by XXXXXXXXXX CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................... v List of Contributors .........................................................................................vii 1 Introduction: thinking about, talking about, and doing community archaeology .................................................................................1 Gabriel Moshenska and Sarah Dhanjal 2 Community Archaeology: conceptual and political issues ..............................6 Rob Isherwood 3 Performance or Participation: the relationship between local communities -
From Respect to Reburial: Negotiating Pagan Interest in Prehistoric Human
From respect to reburial: negotiating pagan interest in prehistoric human remains in Britain, through the Avebury consultation WALLIS, Robert J and BLAIN, Jenny Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/3606/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version WALLIS, Robert J and BLAIN, Jenny (2011). From respect to reburial: negotiating pagan interest in prehistoric human remains in Britain, through the Avebury consultation. Public Archaeology, 10 (1), 23-45. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Paper for: Public Archaeology From Respect to Reburial: Negotiating pagan interest in prehistoric human remains in Britain, through the Avebury Consultation Robert J. Wallis, Richmond University: [email protected] Jenny Blain, Sheffield Hallam University: [email protected] Abstract: The recent Avebury Consultation on reburial has drawn considerable public and professional attention to the issue of pagan calls for respect towards the care of human remains. Our work has pointed to the importance of archaeologists and others engaging seriously and respectfully with pagans as significant stakeholders in our heritage. The Avebury Reburial Consultation suggests this dialogue is increasing in strength, but we identify problems in the process. We focus here on approaches to the prehistoric dead and worldviews enabling communication from which calls or ‘claims’ for the reburial of prehistoric pagan human remains, versus their retention for scientific study, are articulated; frameworks for assessing and adjudicating such ‘claims’; and implications for the interest groups concerned.