Annual Report 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2004 The Board of the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund Annual Report 2004 The Board of the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund 2005. FormgivningEdita Norstedts Tryckeri Rolf Hernegran Kärnavfallsfondens styrelse, c/o Kammarkollegiet P.O. Box 2218, SE-103 15 Stockholm, Sweden www.karnavfallsfonden.se THE SWEDISH NUCLEAR WASTE FUND The Board of the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund Contents Preface 2 Administration Report for the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund 2004 4 Accounting Principles 14 Income Statement 15 Balance Sheet 16 Notes 17 Auditors’ Report 22 1 THE SWEDISH NUCLEAR WASTE FUND Preface In the early 1980’s, the Swedish parliament resolved Some of the main features of the fi nancing system for to implement a special fi nancing system for the future spent nuclear fuel etc. are presented in the diagram be- expense s for the safe management of spent nuclear fuel low. For further details, visit the website of the Board of and for the decommissioning and dismantling of nu- the Nuclear Waste Fund, www.karnavfallsfonden.se clear reactors. In accordance with the fi nancing system, nuclear power utilities pay a special fee to the Swedish The Board of the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund, which state. The size of the fee is based on a certain amount per is a government authority, must submit to the Govern- kWh of electricity delivered by the nuclear power plants. ment each year and no later than by February 22, the The nuclear power utilities are entitled to reimburse- Admi n i stration Report along with the Income Statement ment, on a continuous basis, for any expenses which and Balance Sheet. they have already incurred for measures to achieve the safe handling and disposal of spent nuclear fuel. The re- During 2004, about SEK 508.6 million was paid into mainder of the funds are accumulated for future needs. the Fund. Costs during the year amounted to about SEK In the late 1980’s, a similar system was introduced for 1,106.9 million, most of which comprised reimburse ment the fi nancing of the management of certain radio ac ti ve to the reactor owners. waste from the research facility at Studsvik. As of the time that both fi nancing systems entered into Previously, the funds were deposited in interest-bearing force and up to 2004, about SEK 25,575.8 million was accounts at the Riksbank. Since 1996, the funds have paid in to the Fund. At the same time, other income been accumulated in the Nuclear Waste Fund and have (mainly fi nancial income in the form of interest and been administered by the Board of the Nuclear Waste capital gains with a deduction for capital losses) amount– Fund. Every year, the Government decides the size of ed to about SEK 23,256.4 million. The expenses, largely the fee while the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate in the form of reimbursement to the reactor owners, (SKI) decides on the reimbursement of funds (however, amounted to about SEK 17,150.9 million during the certain minor amounts are decided by the Government). same period. The Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency performs administrative duties on behalf of the Board. The capital of the Nuclear Waste Fund (the book value) amounted to about SEK 31,680.7 million at year- The Government decides on end 2004. In addition to this, unrealized gains on fi nan- fees based on SKI’s proposal cial fi xed assets amounted to about SEK 4,746.7 million. The market value of the Fund at year-end was therefore Electricity consumers estimated at SEK 36,427.4 million. Of this amount, about SEK 670.1 million in provisions were made for the future Nuclear waste fee expenses of the management of the waste from Studsvik. included in the About SEK 35,614.6 million was allocated for the future electricity price expenses of waste from, and for, the dismantling of the Nuclear Waste Swedish nuclear power reactors. The remaining amount Nuclear power utilities Fund concerns accrued fees from the reactor owners and the balance in the interest-bearing account at the National Debt Offi ce. This amount has not yet been allocated for SKI decides on reimbursement the two purposes. from Fund SKB Decommissioning The Board has set a target for the administration of SFR the Fund for the period of 1996–2020 of an average real Disposal return on fund capital of no less than 4 % of the book CLAB value of the capital. In the light of the return achieved so Research and Transport 2 development THE SWEDISH NUCLEAR WASTE FUND far and the investments with long-term maturities already It is not possible for the Board to specify exact deadlines made, the Board should achieve this target if the average for measures for nuclear waste management including annual real return for the period of 2004 to 2020 is no the de com mis sioning of nuclear facilities. These deadli- less than 3.25 %. nes are dependent on a combination of safety con si de r- a tions and business assessments which, in turn, will be he administration report shows that the average real T affected by the guidelines for energy policy decided by return on the capital, during the nine-year period of the Swedish Riksdag at different times. The most recent 1996 to 2004, was 6.9% per year. The administration decisions on such guidelines were made at the end of report also shows that the real return in 2004 was the June 2002. The negotiations between representatives highest ever in the history of the Fund, 12.8 %. The from the Government and from the industry – concern- satisfactory result is mainly attributable to a favourable ing an agreement on a long-term sustainable policy combination of a long duration and decreasing interest for the further reform of the energy system – which I rates. However, it must be emphasized that, through its mentioned in my preface to the 2003 Annual Report long duration, the Fund is sensitive to an increase in of the Nuclear Waste Fund, were interrupted without interest rates and that the yield for a year with increasing results in autumn 2004. interest rates could be negative. In 2004, the Board decid- ed to re-invest the capital in the aim of counteracting The Board of the Nuclear Waste Fund is responsible the effects of such a development. for administering the Fund so that the requirements on an adequate return and an adequate liquidity are he result of the evaluation of the administration of T met. To achieve a high return, the strategy of the Board the Nuclear Waste Fund, mentioned in the preface to last is to ensure that a large part of the assets are invested year’s annual report, was submitted to the Government with long maturities, without incurring any unnecessary in April 2004. interest rate risks. To meet the requirements concerning an adequate liquidity, the Board is dependent on annual he expenses that will be charged to the Nuclear T forecasts from the SKI concerning future disbursements Waste Fund over the next few years are affected, to a from the Fund. The Board has started development work con siderable degree, by the progress of the work on the in order to improve liquidity planning. disposal of spent nuclear fuel during the next few years. Some of the main points of the timetable that the Swe- In December, in his fi nal report, Responsibility for dish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB) are Paying for Nuclear Waste (SOU 2004:125), the special following are presented below. investigator proposed a number of changes in the financing system. The aim of the proposals was to he time-schedules mean that an application for per- T reduce the economic risk borne by the state within the mission to construct an encapsulation plant, probably framework of the current fi nancing system. No essential next to the existing Central Interim Storage Facility for changes in the task of the Board of the Nuclear Waste Spent Nuclear Fuel (CLAB) in Oskarshamn, will be sub- Fund were proposed. However, greater demands will be mitted in the middle of 2006. The plant is expected to be made on the forms of accounting for the accumulated taken into operation in 2017. Site investigations currently funds. The Board is to submit a review statement to the in progress are expected to result in applications at the Government no later than by March 31, 2005. end of 2008 for permission to start the construction of a repository for spent nuclear fuel at a site. It is planned to start repository operation in 2017. According to plans, Stockholm, February 2005 the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and of waste from the decommissioning of Swedish nuclear facilities is expect- ed to be completed in the 2050’s and the repository to be closed in 2060. Chairman 3 THE SWEDISH NUCLEAR WASTE FUND Administration Report for the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund, 2004 Summary est-rate bonds fell to below 2 %. However, bearing in mind the return achieved so far, the Board’s opinion The present system of the administration of the Nu- is that the real return target of a min imum of 4 % clear Waste Fund was introduced in 1996. Since 1981, on the book value of the ad mi ni ster ed funds for the funds have been accumulated from fees paid by the period of 1996 to 2020 can be reached. The market holders of licenses to own or operate nuclear power value of the assets in the Fund increased during the reactors, as long as the reactors are in operation.
Recommended publications
  • “It's So Much More Than Just Sports…”
    Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences “It’s so much more than just sports…” – A study of public health in the municipalities of Hultsfred and Vimmerby Emma Sahlström Department of Urban and Rural Development Master’s Thesis • 30 HEC Agriculture Programme – Rural Development Uppsala 2018 “It’s so much more than just sports…” - A study of public health in the municipalities of Hultsfred and Vimmerby Emma Sahlström Supervisor: Kjell Hansen, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development Examiner: Örjan Bartholdson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development Credits: 30 HEC Level: Second cycle, A2E Course title: Master’s thesis in Rural Development and Natural Resource Management Course code: EX0777 Programme/Education: Agriculture Programme – Rural Development Place of publication: Uppsala Year of publication: 2018 Online publication: http://stud.epsilon.slu.se Keywords: public health, health discourse, biopolitics, governmentality Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Urban and Rural Development Abstract This thesis investigates how the public health discourse takes its expression in the municipalities of Vimmerby and Hultsfred, as health has become an imperative guiding the conduct of everyday life. In the understanding of public health having both political and symbolic dimensions, the theoretical framework of Foucault and the concepts of governmentality and biopower are applied to the empirical material by means of qualitative research methods. The narratives of informants, including public health professionals, engaged members of civil society and individuals in the local LEADER area, are used to explore how public health is done through both explicit and implicit intentions.
    [Show full text]
  • ESPON PROFECY Annex 16. Case Study Report. Vimmerby (Sweden)
    PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe (Inner Peripheries: National territories facing challenges of access to basic services of general interest) Applied Research Final Report Annex 16 Case Study Report Vimmerby (Sweden) Version 07/12/2017 This Applied Research Project is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Anna Berlina, Gunnar Lindberg and John Moodie - Nordregio (Sweden) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Barbara Acreman and Zaira Piazza (Italy), Eedi Sepp (Estonia), Zsolt Szokolai, European Commission. ESPON EGTC: Marjan van Herwijnen (Project Expert), Laurent Frideres (HoU E&O), Ilona Raugze (Director), Piera Petruzzi (Outreach), Johannes Kiersch (Financial Expert). Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This delivery exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON, 2017 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. Contact: [email protected] a PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe ESPON 2020 i Table of contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Technical Report TR-01-16
    Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Technical Report TR-01-16 Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB June 2001 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 ISSN 1404-0344 Graphium Norstedts Tryckeri, 2001 gggggg Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB June 2001 2 Preface Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Com- pany), SKB, has carried out feasibility studies on a municipal scale as a part of the siting programme for the deep repository for spent nuclear fuel. Final reports describing the results of the six feasibility studies in Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Älv- karleby and Hultsfred were submitted during the autumn and winter of 2000/2001. With this as a basis, the siting work can now proceed to the next phase – site investigations. In this stage, investigations that include test drilling will be conducted on at least two sites. In December 2000, SKB published the report “Integrated account of method, site selec- tion and programme prior to the site investigation phase,” in which SKB stipulates where they want to conduct site investigations and how they will be carried out. The report is being reviewed by the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate during the first half of 2001. Before the site investigations can be initiated, the go-ahead is required from the national safety authorities, the Government, and concerned municipalities and landowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Fuel Management
    SE0100130 Technical Report TR-01-03 Integrated account of method, site selection and programme prior to the site investigation phase Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB December 2000 Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK Integrated account of method, site selection and programme prior to the site investigation phase Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB December 2000 Preface The purpose of the ongoing siting process is to find a site on which it is possible to build a deep repository for encapsulated spent nuclear fuel that will be safe in the long term. This report summarizes the material SKB has gathered as a basis for the decisions that need to be made in order for SKB to commence site investigations for a deep repository. SKB's plan is that the investigations, which include test drilling, shall be initiated in 2002. The report contains the supplementary accounts which the Government request- ed in its decision on RD&D-Programme 98 regarding alternative methods, FUD material for site selection, and programme for the site investigations. Research, Development and SKB considers it urgent that the competent authorities and the Government Demonstration clarify in connection with their critical review whether the background material we present here can serve as a basis for: 1. adhering to the KBS-3 method as the most suitable alternative for Sweden and thereby a fundamental premise for the work in the site investigation phase, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lönneberga Trail Stages 1 and 2
    Stages 1 and 2 #hikinghultsfred The Lönneberga Trail This trail crosses the northernmost part of Hultsfred municipality and conn- ects the East Coast Trail with Sevedeleden. The Lönneberga Trail belongs to Sweden’s network of lowland trails and is therefore marked in orange. We have divided it into five different stages (totalling some 60 km) and added 2 extra stretches, together about 20 km. For the most part, the trail is easy to walk, and if you want to spend the night along the way, there are windbreaks at reason- able intervals, as well as hostels and hotels. Walking the entire trail is a great experience, familiarising you with Småland’s richness of nature, culture and history. The Lönneberga Trail offers you a num- ber of fine lookouts and on the way, you will also come across many historical environments and ancient monuments. Share your experiences using #hikinghultsfred, so that more can discover Hultsfred’s beautiful countryside! Here you will find more hiking trails Gissen Lönneberga Faggemåla 4 Silverdalen äge Råden rnv ijä S e il 3 Visböle s ve Norrhult u Ingelstorp 5 Haddarp rån Åkarp M Målasjön 6Vena Linden Gnötteln Ungsberg Skatsjön Fallhult 7 Versjön Hultsfred Sönnerhult Hulingen Bjärkhult L. Hammarsjön Oppbjärken 2 Åkebosjön NerbjärkenNäset Stage 1 Eckerhult - KvarntorpetSt. Hammarsjön Stage 2 Kvarntorpet - Visböle S i l Vensjön v Venshult e r å Stage 3 Visböle - Gisseskalle n Stage 4 Gisseskalle - Lönneberga 1 g ä nv Stage 5 Lönneberga Järnemåla r - jä ei Em Järnforsen us ån Stage 6 Hästhagsgölen - Hultsfred M Stage 7 Hultsfred Lönneberga - Målilla G årdvedaån E m å n Björkmossa Mörlunda HjortöströmVirserumsjön Virserum Hjortensjön Björneström M u s e i j ä r n v ä g Stage 1 starts here Eckerhult-Kvarntorpet 14 km, approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Summaries
    Application Summaries ICLD Municipal Partnership Programme Application Period 1, 2016 1 Page Ref nr Swedish Part Application Decision Botswana 5 2016-0002 Hultsfred municipality Development/Expansion Approval 10 2016-0033 City of Västerås Project Approval 14 2016-0034 City of Västerås Steering group Approval China 18 2016-0003 Åmål municipality Steering Group Rejection 21 2016-0004 Åmål municipality Project Rejection 24 2016-0007 Region Dalarna Project Approval 28 2016-0008 Region Dalarna Steering Group Approval 31 2016-0012 Filipstad municipality Inception Approval 34 2016-0032 Vara municipality Steering Group Approval 37 2016-0035 Borlänge municipality Steering Group Rejection 40 2016-0039 Borlänge municipality Project Rejection 43 2016-0043 Vara municipality Development/Expansion Rejection 46 2016-0045 Gävle municipality Steering Group Rejection 48 2016-0046 Gävle municipality Project Rejection 51 2016-0047 Gävle municipality Project Rejection Kenya 55 2016-0005 Västernorrland County Council Project Approval 58 2016-0006 Västernorrland County Council Steering Group Approval 61 2016-0015 Härryda municipality Steering Group Approval 65 2016-0016 Härryda municipality Project Approval 71 2016-0021 Region Västerbotten Project Approval 74 2016-0030 Västerbotten County council Project Rejection 77 2016-0031 Västerbotten County Council Steering Group Rejection 2 80 2016-0036 Umeå municipality Steering Group Rejection 83 2016-0038 Umeå municipality Project Rejection 88 2016-0050 Norrköping municipality Steering Group Rejection 90 2016-0051
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Studies - Osthammar, Nykoping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Alvkarleby
    SE0100208 Technical Report TR-01-16 Feasibility Studies - Osthammar, Nykoping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Alvkarleby Summary Report Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB June 2001 Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 S 9 I 4 S PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK Preface Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Com- pany), SKB, has carried out feasibility studies on a municipal scale as a part of the siting programme for the deep repository for spent nuclear fuel. Final reports describing the results of the six feasibility studies in Osthammar, Nykoping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Alv- karleby and Hultsfred were submitted during the autumn and winter of 2000/2001. With this as a basis, the siting work can now proceed to the next phase - site investigations. In this stage, investigations that include test drilling will be conducted on at least two sites. In December 2000, SKB published the report "Integrated account of method, site selec- tion and programme prior to the site investigation phase," in which SKB stipulates where they want to conduct site investigations and how they will be carried out. The report is being reviewed by the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate during the first half of 2001. Before the site investigations can be initiated, the go-ahead is required from the national safety authorities, the Government, and concerned municipalities and landowners. SKB projects that the it will be possible to commence the site investigations in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordregio EP 2001:2
    (Nordregio EP 2001:2) NORDREGIO - NORDIC CENTRE FOR SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT Box 1658 SE-111 86 Stockholm Tel. +46-8-4635434- Fax +46-8-4635401 E-mail: [email protected] DORA - DYNAMICS OF RURAL AREAS National Report – Sweden Lars Olof Persson, project leader Vânia A Ceccato With the financial support of the European Commission (FAIR6-CT98-4162) Stockholm Oct, 2001 2 Acknowledgements Without the co-operation of the inhabitants of our study areas in Sweden this research would never have been completed. Thanks to all those who spent their time during the interviewing process between March and May 2000. A special thanks to Åsa Petterson and Mats Brandt, who helped us directly with the interviews. Also thanks to several students involved on the transcription of interviews and to Kay Swenseid for her work on the translation of part of the interviews from Swedish to English and some editing language work of the final report. Special thanks go to the team-coordinator of the DORA project at the Arkleton Centre headed by Prof. John Bryden and his team composed of Anja Timm, Jane Atterton, Paul Courtney, Keith Hart and Gilian Munro. Also to others research partners, in Germany, Helmut Schrader, Gerd Hachmöller, Birgit Koch and Lars Masurek and in Greece, Sofia Efstratoglou, Emmanouela Kourossi and Angelos Efstratoglou. The Swedish DORA team would like to thank the members of the National Steering Group who actively contributed with valuable comments during the development of this project: Birgit Wiberg, Ulla Herlitz, Harry Leiman, Ola Rörling, Maria Gustafsson, Wolfgang Pitcher and Lennart Linqvist. Thanks also to Miriam Stephan, a visiting student to Nordregio from Aalborg University, Denmark that directly contributed to the section on ‘investments’ for the Swedish study areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Boreholes
    Report 2007:6e from the Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste The Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste – KASAM – is an independent scientific committee within the Ministry of the En- vironment. Its task is to advise the Government in matters relating Deep boreholes. An alternative for final disposal of spent nuclear fuel? to nuclear waste and the decommissioning of nuclear installations. KASAM’s members are experts within different areas of importance for the disposal of radioactive waste, not only in technology and science, but also in such areas as ethics, the humanities and the social sciences. In the autumn of 2006, KASAM launched a new transparency programme aimed at strengthening KASAM’s role as an advisor to the Government by shedding light on strategic issues. Question-and- answer sessions and seminars aimed at clarifying facts and values in current issues will be central features. The programme should also serve as a resource for other stakeholders in the future licensing process. A feasibility study for the transparency programme revealed high expectations on the part of central actors in the nuclear waste issue. Among other things, an immediate need was found for a thorough elucidation of questions concerning “deep boreholes” as an alternative to the so-called KBS-3 method. KASAM therefore held a question- and-answer session concerning this method on 14–15 March 2007. Some of the questions that were raised were: What are the technical, geological and hydrological premises and possibilities? What are the risks from different viewpoints and what values underlie different views of the potential and suitability of deep boreholes? This report contains presentations and discussions from the question-and-answer session and concludes with an analysis of the KASAM Report 2007:6e arguments proffered by various actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report TR-02-18
    Technical Report TR-02-18 Swedish deep repository siting programme Guide to the documentation of 25 years of geoscientific research (1976–2000) Alan Geoffrey Milnes GEA Consulting, Uppsala March 2002 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 Swedish deep repository siting programme Guide to the documentation of 25 years of geoscientific research (1976–2000) Alan Geoffrey Milnes GEA Consulting, Uppsala March 2002 Keywords: Sweden, radioactive waste disposal, spent nuclear fuel, deep repository, site selection, geoscientific documentation, bibliography 1976–2000, bedrock fracturing, glaciation, crustal dynamics, ground water, geosphere transport, study sites, Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, feasibility studies, Finland, Canada. This report concerns a study which was conducted for SKB. The conclusions and viewpoints presented in the report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily coincide with those of the client. $EVWUDFW Since the mid-1970s, the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB) has been carrying out geoscientific research and feasibility studies aimed at identifying suitable sites for deep repositories in the Precambrian basement of the Baltic Shield. The documentation of this research effort forms an extensive body of material which is exceptionally wide-ranging and which is generally little known out- side the Swedish nuclear waste community. This has now been compiled in the form of a “documentation guide” in order to make the research results more easily accessi- ble to the scientific community at large, and to show how they relate to their “nearest surroundings”, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report TR-01-03
    Technical Report TR-01-03 Integrated account of method, site selection and programme prior to the site investigation phase Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB December 2000 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 Integrated account of method, site selection and programme prior to the site investigation phase Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB December 2000 Preface The purpose of the ongoing siting process is to find a site on which it is possible to build a deep repository for encapsulated spent nuclear fuel that will be safe in the long term. This report summarizes the material SKB has gathered as a basis for the decisions that need to be made in order for SKB to commence site investigations for a deep repository. SKB’s plan is that the investigations, which include test drilling, shall be initiated in 2002. The report contains the supplementary accounts which the Government request- ed in its decision on RD&D-Programme 98 regarding alternative methods, FUD material for site selection, and programme for the site investigations. Research, Development and SKB considers it urgent that the competent authorities and the Government Demonstration clarify in connection with their critical review whether the background material we present here can serve as a basis for: 1. adhering to the KBS-3 method as the most suitable alternative for Sweden and thereby a fundamental premise for the work in the site investigation phase, 2. proceeding with investigations and consultations on the selected sites in the manner proposed by SKB.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation 2006
    CONSULTATIONS 2006 CONSULTATIONS Consultations according to the Environmental Code Compilation 2006 Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864, SE-102 40 Stockholm, Sweden Telephone +46 8 459 84 00 www.skb.se Consultations according to the Environmental Code Compilation 2006 ISBN 978-91-976141-9-1 EnaInfo/Edita April 2007 Photo: Curt-Robert Lindqvist, Lasse Modin, SKB’s archive. Translation: Richard Nord Translations AB Contents First consultation report submitted 4 The nuclear fuel project 6 SKB’s consultations 9 Local information 14 Documentation of the consultations 18 Completed consultations 20 Excerpts from minutes 23 CONSULTATIONS – COMPILATION 2006 3 First consultation report submitted A major step forward was taken in 2006. It was the year when the licens- ing process started for the final repository system for the spent nuclear fuel. In November we submitted – on schedule, thanks to the dedicated efforts of many employees – our first application to SKI. One of the many appendices was a consultation report. Meanwhile the consulta- tions continue, with sights set on the applications we plan to submit to SKI and the Environmental Court in 2009 for the final repository under the Nuclear Activities Act and for the entire final repository system under the Environmental Code. It has now been five years since we at SKB, after many years of preparations, started the first formal consultations in preparation for the applications under the Environmental Code and the Nuclear Activities Act for permits to establish an encapsulation plant and a final repository for the spent nuclear fuel from the Swedish nuclear power plants. The site investigations in Forsmark (Östhammar Municipality) and Simpevarp/Laxemar (Oskarshamn Municipality) are in their final phase.
    [Show full text]