DOCSLIB.ORG

Safety Cases for Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Where Do We Stand?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safety Cases for Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Where Do We Stand? Radioactive Waste Management ISBN 978-92-64-99050-0 Safety Cases for Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Where Do We Stand? Symposium Proceedings Paris, France 23-25 January 2007 Organised by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in co-operation with the European Commission (EC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) © OECD 2008 NEA No. 6319 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. * * * This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) was established on 1st February 1958 under the name of the OEEC European Nuclear Energy Agency. It received its present designation on 20th April 1972, when Japan became its first non-European full member. NEA membership today consists of 28 OECD member countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities also takes part in the work of the Agency. The mission of the NEA is: to assist its member countries in maintaining and further developing, through international co-operation, the scientific, technological and legal bases required for a safe, environmentally friendly and economical use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, as well as to provide authoritative assessments and to forge common understandings on key issues, as input to government decisions on nuclear energy policy and to broader OECD policy analyses in areas such as energy and sustainable development. Specific areas of competence of the NEA include safety and regulation of nuclear activities, radioactive waste management, radiological protection, nuclear science, economic and technical analyses of the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear law and liability, and public information. The NEA Data Bank provides nuclear data and computer program services for participating countries. In these and related tasks, the NEA works in close collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, with which it has a Co-operation Agreement, as well as with other international organisations in the nuclear field. © OECD 2008 OECD freely authorises the use, including the photocopy, of this material for private, non-commercial purposes. Permission to photocopy portions of this material for any public use or commercial purpose may be obtained from the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) [email protected]. All copies must retain the copyright and other proprietary notices in their original forms. All requests for other public or commercial uses of this material or for translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Cover credit: Deep Geologic Repository Concept at the Bruce Site (Canada). FOREWORD A safety case for the post-closure phase of a geological repository is a synthesis of evidence, analyses and arguments to quantify and substantiate that a repository will be safe after closure and beyond the time when active control of the facility can be relied upon. A safety case is presented, most often by organisations responsible for implementing waste disposal solutions, at specific points in the process of repository development. The International Symposium on Safety Cases for Deep Geological Disposal: Where Do We Stand? (held in January 2007 in Paris, France) covered practical experience in defining, planning and developing the elements of a safety case for deep geological disposal of radioactive waste. Presentations by invited speakers, including stakeholders, also addressed the communication and presentation of safety cases. The aims of the symposium were to: x Share practical experiences on preparing for, developing and documenting a safety case both at the technical and managerial levels (testing the concept of a safety case). x Share experiences on the regulatory perspective. What are the regulatory requirements and expectations of the safety case? Does the safety case provide answers? x Highlight the progress made in the last decade, the actual state of the art and the observed trends. x Assess the relevance of the international contributions in this field. x Receive indications useful to the future work programmes of the NEA and other international organisations. The symposium was organised by the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), in co-operation with the European Commission (EC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Participants in the symposium included approximately 150 representatives from implementer, regulatory, scientific and stakeholder organisations in nearly 20 countries and international organisations. These symposium proceedings represent a multitude of contributions in the development and communication of the safety case made during the past 15-20 years, thereby building on the experience and knowledge exchanged at the previous international symposium of 1989, also organised by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, the EC and the IAEA. In addition to the contributed papers, these proceedings include an overview of the symposium, a synthesis of lessons learnt from an international perspective and detailed session-by-session summaries of the symposium. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The planning and implementation of the symposium were supported by the efforts of the programme committee, whose members were: Peter De Preter Agency for Radioactive Waste and Enriched Fissile Materials, ONDRAF/NIRAS, Belgium Bruno Cahen Agency for Radioactive Waste Management, Andra, France Sylvie Voinis Agency for Radioactive Waste Management, Andra, France Gérard Bruno Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety Institute, IRSN, France Hiroyuki Umeki Japan Atomic Energy Agency, JAEA, Japan Jesús Alonso Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radiactivos, SA, ENRESA, Spain Bo Stromberg Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, SKI, Sweden Piet Zuidema National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste, NAGRA, Switzerland Alan Hooper United Kingdom Nirex Limited, United Kingdom Abraham Van Luik Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Department of Energy, DOE, United States of America Michel Raynal European Commission, EC, Belgium Didier Louvat International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, Austria Claudio Pescatore Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD/NEA, France Betsy Forinash Integration Group for the Safety Case, IGSC, Secretariat, OECD/NEA, France The proceedings were drafted with the support of the United States (US) Department of Energy (DOE), with consultation and review by the NEA Secretariat, the Programme Committee, and symposium authors, presenters, session chairs and rapporteurs. The NEA staff wishes to acknowledge in particular the efforts of representatives of the US DOE (Barbara Merrill of Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC, Las Vegas, Nevada; Peter Swift of US Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico; and Abraham Van Luik, US DOE, Las Vegas, Nevada) in materially aiding the production of these proceedings. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ..................................................................................................................................... 3 OVERVIEW OF THE SYMPOSIUM ............................................................................................. 9 DEVELOPMENT AND MATURITY OF THE SAFETY CASE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE FROM THE NEA SECRETARIAT ................................................................... 15 Background .................................................................................................................................. 15 The Concept and Meaning of the “Safety Case” .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Net Zero by 2050 a Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050
    Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 Interactive iea.li/nzeroadmap Net Zero by 2050 Data iea.li/nzedata INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance the Ireland reliability, affordability Italy and sustainability of Japan energy in its Korea 30 member Luxembourg countries, Mexico 8 association Netherlands countries and New Zealand beyond. Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Spain Sweden Please note that this publication is subject to Switzerland specific restrictions that limit Turkey its use and distribution. The United Kingdom terms and conditions are available online at United States www.iea.org/t&c/ This publication and any The European map included herein are without prejudice to the Commission also status of or sovereignty over participates in the any territory, to the work of the IEA delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword We are approaching a decisive moment for international efforts to tackle the climate crisis – a great challenge of our times.
    [Show full text]
  • International Nuclear Law Essentials Programme
    International Nuclear Law Essentials Paris, France 17 – 21 February 2020 Programme Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency Office of Legal Counsel ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 36 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Korea, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) was established on 1 February 1958. Current NEA membership consists of 33 countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Korea, Romania, Russia, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Nuclear Reactor Development
    THREE-AGENCE STUDY IAEA INNOVATIVE NUCLEAR REACTOR DEVELOPMENT Opportunities for International Co-operation Profil couleur : Generic CMYK printer profile - None Composite Trame par dØfaut INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY 9, rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris, cedex 15, France The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) was established on 1st February 1958 under the name The International Energy Agency (IEA) is an of the OEEC European Nuclear Energy Agency. It autonomous body which was established in received its present designation on 20th April November 1974 within the framework of the 1972, when Japan became its first non-European Organisation for Economic Co-operation and full Member. NEA membership today consists of Development (OECD) to implement an inter- 28 OECD Member countries: Australia, Austria, national energy programme. Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, It carries out a comprehensive programme of Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, energy co-operation among twenty-six* of the Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, OECD’s thirty Member countries. The basic aims of the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Republic of the IEA are: Korea, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. • to maintain and improve systems for coping The Commission of the European Communities also with oil supply disruptions; takes part in the work of the Agency. • to promote rational energy policies in a global The mission of the NEA is: context through co-operative relations
    [Show full text]
  • “It's So Much More Than Just Sports…”
    Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences “It’s so much more than just sports…” – A study of public health in the municipalities of Hultsfred and Vimmerby Emma Sahlström Department of Urban and Rural Development Master’s Thesis • 30 HEC Agriculture Programme – Rural Development Uppsala 2018 “It’s so much more than just sports…” - A study of public health in the municipalities of Hultsfred and Vimmerby Emma Sahlström Supervisor: Kjell Hansen, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development Examiner: Örjan Bartholdson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development Credits: 30 HEC Level: Second cycle, A2E Course title: Master’s thesis in Rural Development and Natural Resource Management Course code: EX0777 Programme/Education: Agriculture Programme – Rural Development Place of publication: Uppsala Year of publication: 2018 Online publication: http://stud.epsilon.slu.se Keywords: public health, health discourse, biopolitics, governmentality Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Urban and Rural Development Abstract This thesis investigates how the public health discourse takes its expression in the municipalities of Vimmerby and Hultsfred, as health has become an imperative guiding the conduct of everyday life. In the understanding of public health having both political and symbolic dimensions, the theoretical framework of Foucault and the concepts of governmentality and biopower are applied to the empirical material by means of qualitative research methods. The narratives of informants, including public health professionals, engaged members of civil society and individuals in the local LEADER area, are used to explore how public health is done through both explicit and implicit intentions.
    [Show full text]
  • NUCLEAR LAW BULLETIN No. 46
    NUCLEAR LAW BULLETIN No. 46 Contents Detailed Table of Contents Studies and Articles Case Law and Administrative Decisions National Legrslative and Regulatory Actrvrtres International Regulatory Activitres Agreements Texts Bibliography ThlS BulletIn ulcludeo a supplement December 1990 Nuclear Energy Agency Orgamsakan for Economic Co-operahon and Development Pursuant to article I of the Convention ugncd m Pdns on 14th December 1960 and u hlch came mm force on 30th September 1961. the Organ~satwn for F.conom~c Gopcrat~on and Development (OECD) shall promote pols~cs deagned - to achwe the hlghat sustamahk economw growth and employment and a nrmg standard of lwmg m Member countna whde mamtammg linanaal stablIlt, and thus to mntnhute to the ckvclopment of the world economy - to contnbutc to sound cconom~c cxpansmn m Member as well as non-member countnes tn the prams of ec~norn~c development and - to contnbute to the expansmn of world trade on a mululateral nondwnmmatory basis m accordance wth mtcntatmnal obbgattons The ongmal Member countnes of the OECD are Austna Beigmm Canada Denmark France the Federal Rcpubbc of Germany, Greece Iceland Ireland Italy Luxembourg the Netherlands Norway, Portugal Spam Sweden Swttzerland Turkey the Umted Kmgdom and the Umted Stata Tbe followmg countnes became Members subsequentI) through accewon at the data mdtcated hereafter Japan (28th Apnl 1964) Finland (28th Januan 1969) Autraba (7th June 1971) and New Zealand (29th May 1973) The Soaabst Federal Repubbc of Yugoslavia takes part m some of the work of the
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Role and Image of the Regulator in Radioactive Waste Management
    Radioactive Waste Management 2012 The Evolving Role and Image of the Regulator in Radioactive Waste Management Trends over Two Decades NEA Radioactive Waste Management ISBN 978-92-64-99186-6 The Evolving Role and Image of the Regulator in Radioactive Waste Management: Trends over Two Decades © OECD 2012 NEA No. 7083 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 34 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This work is published on the responsibility of the OECD Secretary-General.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy
    ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION • ENERGY REQUIREMENT NUCLEAR ENERGY In 2009 nuclear energy provided nearly 22% of total electricity Comparability supply in OECD countries. However, the use of nuclear Some generation data are provisional and may be subject to energy varies widely. In all, 18 of the 34 OECD countries use revision. Generation data for Japan are for the fiscal year. nuclear energy at present, with ten generating one-third or more of their power from this source in 2009. Collectively, OECD countries produce about 83% of the world’s nuclear Nuclear electricity generation energy. The remainder is produced in 12 non-OECD Terawatt hours, 2009 economies. 798.7 847.7 Definition 400 375 The table gives the nuclear electricity generation in terawatt 350 hours (TWh) in each of the OECD member countries and in 325 selected non-OECD countries. The chart shows the 300 percentage share of nuclear in total electricity generation, in 275 each country and in the OECD as a whole. 250 The table also provides information on the number of 225 nuclear power plants in operation and under construction 200 as of 1 June 2011. 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 1 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932535014 Overview Nuclear energy expanded rapidly in the 1970s and 1980s, but in the last 20 years only small numbers of new nuclear power plants have entered operation. The role of nuclear energy in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and in increasing energy diversification and security of supply has been increasingly recognised over the last few years, leading to renewed interest in building new nuclear plants in several countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Symposium, Safety Cases for the Deep Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Where Do We Stand? Held January 23–25, 2007 in Paris, France
    QUICK LOOK TRIP REPORT Subject: Foreign Travel Quick Look Report—Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Symposium, Safety Cases for the Deep Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Where Do We Stand? held January 23–25, 2007 in Paris, France Travel Dates: January 22–28, 2007 Location: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Headquarters, Paris, France Organization/Committee: Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Desired Outcome: The information and insights gained from the participation in the symposium will assist in integrating international perspectives on high-level radioactive waste repository programs and would make NRC/CNWRA activities and decisions more effective, efficient, and realistic. Results Achieved: The symposium resulted in improved understandings of commonalities of and differences between the approaches of different countries in developing safety cases for the deep geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste. The traveler presented a paper titled Perspectives on Developing Independent Performance Assessment Capability to Support Regulatory Reviews of the Safety Case. The traveler also presented a poster on behalf of an NRC staff member who was unable to attend; the poster title was Preclosure Safety Analysis for Seismically Initiated Event Sequences. Discussions following the presentation topics during the meeting provided valuable exchange of information and feedback as indicated in the items of note in the following Summary of the Trip. Summary of Trip: The stated aims of the symposium were to provide a venue to (i) share practical experiences on preparing for, developing and documenting a safety case; (ii) share experiences on the regulatory perspective; (iii) highlight the progress made in the last decade, the actual state of the art, and the observed trends; (iv) assess the relevance of international contributions in this field; and (v) receive indications useful to the future working program of the NEA and other international organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Nuclear Power Programme
    Polish Nuclear Power Programme ____________________________________ Warsaw, January 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. SUMMARY OF ACTIONS TAKEN TO DATE ..................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2. THE OBJECTIVES AND THE SCHEDULE OF THE POLISH NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME . 11 2.1. THE FOUNDATIONS OF PNPP ..................................................................................................... 11 2.2. TERM OF PNPP ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. DIAGNOSIS OF THE SITUATION IN THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD .............................................. 13 2.4. SWOT .......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.5. MAJOR OBJECTIVE AND DETAILED OBJECTIVES ......................................................................... 15 2.6. RELATED STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................ 16 2.7. MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF ACHIEVING THE MAJOR OBJECTIVE AND THE DETAILED OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ESPON PROFECY Annex 16. Case Study Report. Vimmerby (Sweden)
    PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe (Inner Peripheries: National territories facing challenges of access to basic services of general interest) Applied Research Final Report Annex 16 Case Study Report Vimmerby (Sweden) Version 07/12/2017 This Applied Research Project is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Anna Berlina, Gunnar Lindberg and John Moodie - Nordregio (Sweden) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Barbara Acreman and Zaira Piazza (Italy), Eedi Sepp (Estonia), Zsolt Szokolai, European Commission. ESPON EGTC: Marjan van Herwijnen (Project Expert), Laurent Frideres (HoU E&O), Ilona Raugze (Director), Piera Petruzzi (Outreach), Johannes Kiersch (Financial Expert). Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This delivery exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON, 2017 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. Contact: [email protected] a PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe ESPON 2020 i Table of contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Technical Report TR-01-16
    Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Technical Report TR-01-16 Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB June 2001 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 ISSN 1404-0344 Graphium Norstedts Tryckeri, 2001 gggggg Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB June 2001 2 Preface Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Com- pany), SKB, has carried out feasibility studies on a municipal scale as a part of the siting programme for the deep repository for spent nuclear fuel. Final reports describing the results of the six feasibility studies in Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Älv- karleby and Hultsfred were submitted during the autumn and winter of 2000/2001. With this as a basis, the siting work can now proceed to the next phase – site investigations. In this stage, investigations that include test drilling will be conducted on at least two sites. In December 2000, SKB published the report “Integrated account of method, site selec- tion and programme prior to the site investigation phase,” in which SKB stipulates where they want to conduct site investigations and how they will be carried out. The report is being reviewed by the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate during the first half of 2001. Before the site investigations can be initiated, the go-ahead is required from the national safety authorities, the Government, and concerned municipalities and landowners.
    [Show full text]
  • IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Industrial Safety Guidelines for Nuclear Facilities No
    IAEA Nuclear Energy Series IAEA Nuclear No. NP-T-3.3 No. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Industrial Safety Guidelines for Nuclear Facilities Industrial Safety Guidelines for Nuclear No. NP-T-3.3 Basic Industrial Safety Principles Guidelines for Nuclear Facilities Objectives Guides Technical Reports Jointly sponsored by INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA ISBN 978–92–0–101617–1 ISSN 1995–7807 @ IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES PUBLICATIONS STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES Under the terms of Articles III.A and VIII.C of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on the peaceful uses of atomic energy. The publications in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series provide information in the areas of nuclear power, nuclear fuel cycle, radioactive waste management and decommissioning, and on general issues that are relevant to all of the above mentioned areas. The structure of the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises three levels: 1 — Basic Principles and Objectives; 2 — Guides; and 3 — Technical Reports. The Nuclear Energy Basic Principles publication describes the rationale and vision for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Objectives publications explain the expectations to be met in various areas at different stages of implementation. Nuclear Energy Series Guides provide high level guidance on how to achieve the objectives related to the various topics and areas involving the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Technical Reports provide additional, more detailed information on activities related to the various areas dealt with in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications are coded as follows: NG — general; NP — nuclear power; NF — nuclear fuel; NW — radioactive waste management and decommissioning.
    [Show full text]