DOCSLIB.ORG

Pdf/87/1/132/1792338/Tneq a 00347.Pdf by Guest on 26 September 2021 ADMISSION?: a CHALLENGE Michael P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pdf/87/1/132/1792338/Tneq a 00347.Pdf by Guest on 26 September 2021 ADMISSION?: a CHALLENGE Michael P Reconsiderations: An Exchange DID JOHN DAVENPORT’S CHURCH REQUIRE CONVERSION NARRATIVES FOR CHURCH Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/tneq/article-pdf/87/1/132/1792338/tneq_a_00347.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 ADMISSION?: A CHALLENGE michael p. winship EING admitted into a New England church was no easy matter B in the seventeenth century. Prospective members were expected to show that they were “sound in the faith,” as John Cotton put it, by making their doctrinal knowledge evident. More daunting, they were also expected to show that they knew faith not only intellectually but savingly, what the minister John Norton called “experimental faith,” through an account of their conversion. The 1648 Cambridge Platform called this conversion account a “relation,” or “a personal and publick confession and declaring of God’s manner of working upon the soul.” Besides being codified in the Cambridge Platform, relations were presented as normative in accounts of New England church practices by Norton, Thomas Lechford, and John Cotton.1 Normative was not the same as mandatory, of course; congrega- tional churches could not collectively compel individual churches. “A relation of the work of conversion . hath been ordinarily used in most of our churches,” wrote Jonathan Mitchel in 1664 (Mitchel may have been thinking of the Presbyterian leaning churches of Newbury and Hingham as the exceptions, along with Thomas Hooker’s Hart- ford church and perhaps a few more obscure ones). Three decades later, Increase Mather remembered only Hooker’s as being an earlier Congregationalist church that did not use relations.2 1John Cotton, A Copy of a Letter (London, 1641), p. 5; John Norton, Respon- sio ad totam quaestionum syllogen a` clarissimo viro domino Guilielmo Apollonio (London, 1648), p. 13; Cotton Mather, Magnalia Christi Americana, 2 vols. (Hartford, 1853), 2:226; Thomas Lechford, Plain Dealing: or, News from New England (Boston, 1867), pp. 18–25. 2Mather, Magnalia, 2:28, 103. Plymouth colony churches may have been slow to adopt relations and may have never been as stringent about them as the other orthodox The New England Quarterly, vol. LXXXVII, no. 1 (March 2014). C 2014 by The New England Quarterly. All rights reserved. doi:10.1162/TNEQ a 00347. 132 RECONSIDERATIONS 133 In his much-needed 2012 biography of the important puritan min- ister John Davenport, Francis Bremer argues that Davenport’s New Haven church was also an exception to the general practice. Accord- ing to Bremer, Davenport believed that “true understanding and the ability to make godly choices” were sufficient signs of “saving grace.” Therefore, Bremer states, “evidence of godly behavior and a true pro- fession of faith” were the sole requirements for joining Davenport’s Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/tneq/article-pdf/87/1/132/1792338/tneq_a_00347.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 church. What was not required, Bremer says repeatedly, was a rela- tion, “a personal account of how [prospective members] had experi- enced God’s grace and been born again.”3 Bremer’s novel claim opens up intriguing interpretive possibilities. Davenport, Thomas Hooker, and John Cotton were the three most prominent ministers to immi- grate to Massachusetts. Hooker heretofore has been the only promi- nent New England minister known to have rejected conversion narra- tives. Not coincidently, he chose to found the colony of Connecticut rather than remain in Massachusetts. By Bremer’s reading, disap- proval of relations might have helped spur the founding of the other orthodox puritan colony, Davenport’s New Haven, as well. The re- jection of relations by two of New England’s three most prominent ministers emphasizes just how outside the puritan mainstream the practice was. The importance of Bremer’s claim has already been recognized.4 But is that claim correct? Or can the stream of scholarly conventional wisdom continue to flow placidly in its wonted course? If Bremer’s claim is correct, it is counter-intuitive. Bremer does not provide any contemporary comment on Davenport’s alleged deviation from the norm, whereas Thomas Hooker’s was noted by both Cotton Mather and his father Increase.5 There is no record of Davenport intervening on the topic of relations when the Cambridge Platform was being written, as he did about other topics. A prominent element colonies. See George D. Langdon, Pilgrim Colony: A History of New Plymouth, 1620– 1691 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), pp. 129–31, and Robert G. Pope, The Half-Way Covenant: Church Membership in Puritan New England (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969), pp. 264–65. 3Francis Bremer, Building a New Jerusalem: John Davenport, a Puritan in Three Worlds (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012), pp. 188, 186, 185, 259. Further page references will be cited in the text. 4Walter Woodward, review of Bremer’s Building a New Jerusalem, New England Quarterly 86 (June 2013): 325. 5Mather, Magnalia, 1:349, 2:68. 134 THE NEW ENGLAND QUARTERLY in the New Haven church’s contemporary reputation, unremarked by Bremer, was the strictness of its admission standards. Davenport was “the strictest man for . admitting of members in New England,” Robert Child wrote in 1648. Cotton Mather referred to “a more than ordinary exactness in admitting members. ...Ihadalmostsaid severely strict.” William Hubbard called Davenport’s church “careful” 6 while acknowledging that opponents would find it “overly strict.” Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/tneq/article-pdf/87/1/132/1792338/tneq_a_00347.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Relations were acknowledged as the strictest and most severe part of the Congregational church admission process, and so it is difficult to see how Davenport’s church would have gotten its reputation in their absence. Moreover, as Bremer notes, in the only glimpse we have of the New Haven church’s admission standards in practice, relations are prominent. The process of selecting the visible saints who would found the church began, according to a contemporary manuscript, when neighbors “gave their accounts one to another of God’s gracious work on them” (p. 182). In light of New England norms, the silence of the archives, and the reputation of Davenport’s church, it might seem reasonable to infer later admission practices from the way the church was founded. Bremer, however, dismisses any such inference. He claims that these early meetings were “informal” (p. 190). Thereafter, he says, “there is no evidence that such accounts had to be delivered to the congre- gation for an individual to obtain membership” (p. 191). Lack of evidence that relations were the norm (if that is so) is, of course, not positive evidence that they were not. Bremer’s positive case is inferential and rests on two foundations. The first foundation is an argument about Davenport’s “understanding of the process of salvation” (p. 185). Bremer suggests that the turbulent up-and-down spirituality of many puritans, eloquently captured in the conversion accounts in the existing relations, might have been alien to him. No Davenport spiritual diary survives, although that is true of many ministers, nor does a detailed account of a conversion experience, although Cotton Mather’s biography of Davenport can be read to suggest that he was converted while barely a teenager.7 6Robert Child to Samuel Hartlib, in The Hartlib Papers: A Complete Text and Image Database of the Papers of Samuel Hartlib (c. 1600–1662) Held in Sheffield Univer- sity Library; Prepared by Members of the Hartlib Papers Project, ed.J.Crawford et al. (Ann Arbor, UMI Research Publications, 1995), 39/2/5A-6B; Mather, Magnalia, 1:328; William Hubbard, A General History of New England: From the Discovery to MDCLXXX (1848), p. 320. 7Mather, Magnalia, 1:322. RECONSIDERATIONS 135 Bremer reinforces this foundation of his argument by stating that Davenport “never addressed himself in print to the stages of conver- sion” and displayed “inattention to issues of the saint’s preparation [for salvation]” (p. 185). That claim needs to be qualified. Only one, not very long set of sermons on practical divinity by Davenport was pub- lished. This set provides a slender base from which to make a broad generalization about his inattention in print, or lack thereof, to prepa- Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/tneq/article-pdf/87/1/132/1792338/tneq_a_00347.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 ration. On the other hand, Davenport coauthored a warm preface to another minister’s treatise that did focus on preparation. Davenport discusses the stages of conversion briefly in the published doctrinal profession of faith he gave while being admitted to the New Haven church. Those stages follow the normative puritan model. Conversion is a process that includes preparation. The convert is first prepared for conversion by realizing his complete, helpless, damnable corruption, “awakened and humbled by the Law . judging himself worthy to be destroyed for his sins, and . utterly destitute of all help or hope of himself.” After this awakening, if the would-be convert is among the elect, the Holy Spirit will reveal Christ in his true salvific nature.8 In short, Bremer’s foundational argument about Davenport’s un- derstanding of the process of salvation hardly seems strong enough to bear the weight of the claim about admission expectations he erects on it. To bolster it, Bremer repeatedly draws parallels between Davenport’s and John Cotton’s understanding of conversion. But Cot- ton expected relations, which would appear to undercut the intrinsic relevance of Bremer’s argument.9 8John Davenport, The Profession of the Faith of That Reverend and Worthy Divine Mr. J. D. (London, 1642), p. 6; John Preston, The Saints Qualification (London, 1633), “To the Christian Reader.” 9There is a tendency among New England historians to take Thomas Hooker as the yardstick by which to measure a minister’s commitment to preparation, but Hooker was recognized at the time as an extremist.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MASSACHUSETTS: Or the First Planters of New-England, the End and Manner of Their Coming Thither, and Abode There: in Several EPISTLES (1696)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Joshua Scottow Papers Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 1696 MASSACHUSETTS: or The first Planters of New-England, The End and Manner of their coming thither, and Abode there: In several EPISTLES (1696) John Winthrop Governor, Massachusetts Bay Colony Thomas Dudley Deputy Governor, Massachusetts Bay Colony John Allin Minister, Dedham, Massachusetts Thomas Shepard Minister, Cambridge, Massachusetts John Cotton Teaching Elder, Church of Boston, Massachusetts See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow Part of the American Studies Commons Winthrop, John; Dudley, Thomas; Allin, John; Shepard, Thomas; Cotton, John; Scottow, Joshua; and Royster,, Paul Editor of the Online Electronic Edition, "MASSACHUSETTS: or The first Planters of New- England, The End and Manner of their coming thither, and Abode there: In several EPISTLES (1696)" (1696). Joshua Scottow Papers. 7. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joshua Scottow Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors John Winthrop; Thomas Dudley; John Allin; Thomas Shepard; John Cotton; Joshua Scottow; and Paul Royster, Editor of the Online Electronic Edition This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ scottow/7 ABSTRACT CONTENTS In 1696 there appeared in Boston an anonymous 16mo volume of 56 pages containing four “epistles,” written from 66 to 50 years earlier, illustrating the early history of the colony of Massachusetts Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving England and Coming to New Haven with John Davenport
    Curriculum Units by Fellows of the Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute 2003 Volume II: Everyday Life in Early America Leaving England and Coming to New Haven with John Davenport Curriculum Unit 03.02.08 by Sheila Wade Introduction I teach fifth grade. Students in this age group are just developing the ability to think critically and to understand a different point of view. However the challenge remains to make this period of time come alive and interesting. Like many who are passionate about history I am confounded by the task of engaging others. I begin this task at the very beginning. Who came to America? When did they come? Why did they come? Who settled in Connecticut? When? Why? I will ask such questions and then set about discovering the answers with my students. We will determine who was a puritan and were all the early colonists puritans? Did all puritans have the same beliefs?To make it more relevant students will conduct their historical inquiry from a colonist's point of view. Who lived in New England and more specifically Connecticut? The Pilgrims, a group of Puritans who had left England and separated themselves from the Church of England and had lived for awhile in Holland, landed in Provincetown and sailed across the bay to establish a settlement Plymouth in November 1620. This was a mistake the captain had missed his destination, Jamestown in Virginia, by about 500 miles. The ship the Mayflower had 101 passengers and only 35 were Pilgrims. Who were these pilgrims and why were they called separatists? How quickly did the Plymouth colony and the Massachusetts Bay colony get settled? Three hundred ships arrived between 1620 and 1640.
    [Show full text]
  • RELIGIOUS CONTROVERSIES in PLYMOUTH COLONY by Richard Howland Maxwell Pilgrim Society Note, Series Two, June 1996
    RELIGIOUS CONTROVERSIES IN PLYMOUTH COLONY by Richard Howland Maxwell Pilgrim Society Note, Series Two, June 1996 Plymouth Colony was born out of a religious controversy and was not itself immune to such controversies. The purpose of this lecture is to consider some of those controversies in order that we may better understand the Pilgrims, their attitudes, and their relationships with some other individuals and groups. We will start with some background concerns central to the identity of the Plymouth group, then move on to consider the relationships the Pilgrims had with some of their clergy, and focus finally on two groups who were not welcome in Plymouth or any other English colony. I wish to begin with two pairs of terms and concepts about which we seem often to find confusion. The first pair is Pilgrims and Puritans - or more accurately, Separatists and other Puritans. Some of you have heard me expound on this theme before, and it is not my intention to repeat that presentation. To understand the Pilgrims, however, we need to understand the religious and cultural background from which they came. We need also, I think, to understand something about their neighbors to the north, who shared their background but differed with them in some important ways. That shared background is the Puritan movement within the Church of England. The most succinct description of Puritanism that I have read comes from Bradford Smith’s biography titled Bradford of Plymouth. Smith wrote: Puritanism in England was essentially a movement within the established church for the purifying of that church - for ministers godly and able to teach, for a simplifying of ritual, for a return to the virtues of primitive Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Soul Liberty in Early New England: the 1654 Dismissal of Henry Dunster, First President of Harvard, for His An
    THE STRUGGLE FOR SOUL LIBERTY IN EARLY NEW ENGLAND: THE 1654 DISMISSAL OF HENRY DUNSTER, FIRST PRESIDENT OF HARVARD, FOR HIS ANTI-PAEDOBAPTIST VIEWS A paper given at the Northeast Regional of the Evangelical Theological Society held at the Mid-America Baptist Theological Seminary (Northeast Branch) By Wayne R. Brandow M.Div. Mid-America Baptist Theological Seminary, 2000 April 17, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 CONCERNING THE TITLE OF THIS PAPER ............................................................................. 4 HENRY DUNSTER ..................................................................................................................... 5 HARVARD .................................................................................................................................. 6 DUNSTER MAKES KNOWN HIS VIEWS ON BAPTISM ............................................................. 8 THE CONCERN OF FRIENDS ................................................................................................. 10 THE CONFERENCE ................................................................................................................. 11 Chart: Towns and Ministers represented in the Conference .......................................... 11 Chart: Those at the Conference with Dunster who had sons in Harvard ........................ 12 THE DEBATE ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Davis Umn 0130E 10471.Pdf (3.294Mb
    From Hawthorne to History: The Mythologizing of John Endecott A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Abigail F. Davis IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Edward M. Griffin June 2009 copyright Abigail F. Davis 2009 i DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to Dr. Edward M. Griffin advisor, mentor, friend ii ABSTRACT Since the Revolutionary War, American historians, literary artists, and social commentators have undertaken a retroactive search for an acceptable myth of origin predating the Revolution. While the war itself has been endlessly and successfully deployed as a sterling founding moment, that claim alone has proved insufficient for several reasons. First, Americans have long been ambivalent about their pre-Revolution Puritan heritage. The new republic emerging from the revolutionary effort rested on ground previously inhabited by British colonists (and others) since the 1620s, but the colonial past did not readily speak to the feisty, independent, and distinctively AAmerican” self-image that mythologized during and after the war . Additionally, by the 19 th century, when the writing of New England history came prominently into vogue, quite a few pages of the Puritan chapter had become embarrassing. Something else was needed: an event earlier than the shot heard round the world in 1775, and a governing image more manly than the standard figure of the pious Puritans. When Nathaniel Hawthorne =s stories AEndicott and the Red Cross @ and AThe May- Pole of Merry Mount @ entered the nubile world of American literature in the 1830s, Hawthorne seemed to have answered that call.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Catholicism and Colonial New England" (2015)
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected Masters Essays Theses, Essays, and Senior Honors Projects Spring 2015 NEW ENGLAND’S GOD: ANTI- CATHOLICISM AND COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND Matthew .J Nowak John Carroll University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Nowak, Matthew J., "NEW ENGLAND’S GOD: ANTI-CATHOLICISM AND COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND" (2015). Masters Essays. 17. http://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays/17 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Essays, and Senior Honors Projects at Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Essays by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW ENGLAND’S GOD: ANTI-CATHOLICISM AND COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND An Essay Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts & Sciences of John Carroll University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Matthew J. Nowak 2015 Introduction The Puritans left England because of Roman Catholicism. Either because of perceived threats by Catholics or Pseudo-Catholics or their detestation of the continued presence of Catholic influence in church, government, and society, Puritans believed there existed a better way of life outside the sway of Catholicism. The people who left England during the seventeenth century and founded the colonies of New England – Massachusetts, Connecticut, Plymouth, Rhode Island, and New Haven – did so in the spirit of religion and reform. Born from the turmoil of religious persecution and political experimentalism, New England Puritanism – which is the primary focus of this discussion – created a unique overarching society that focused on godliness, Biblical law, substantive justice, participation, and cohesion.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the Founding of Third Church, Boston, 1669-1674
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2009 Subordinate saints : women and the founding of Third Church, Boston, 1669-1674 Melissa Ann Johnson Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the History of Religion Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Johnson, Melissa Ann, "Subordinate saints : women and the founding of Third Church, Boston, 1669-1674" (2009). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3662. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5546 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THESIS APPROVAL The abstract and thesis of Melissa Ann Johnson for the Master of Arts in History were presented August 25, 2009, and accepted 9Y the thesis committee and the department. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: Tim Garrison DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: Thomas Luckett, Chair Department of History ABSTRACT An abstract of the thesis of Melissa Ann Johnson for the Master of Arts in History presented August 25, 2009. Title: Subordinate Saints: Women and the Founding of Third Church, Boston, 1669-1674 Although seventeenth-century New England has been one of the most heavily studied subjects in American history, women's lived experience of Puritan church membership has been incompletely understood. Histories of New England's Puritan churches have often assumed membership to have had universal implications, and studies of New England women either have focused on dissenting women or have neglected women's religious lives altogether despite the centrality of religion to the structure of New England society and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • View on the Rise of the Public Sphere in the Early Modern Atlantic World…………………………………………………………
    FROM PROCLAMATION TO DIALOGUE: THE COLONIAL PRESS AND THE EMERGENCE OF AN AMERICAN PUBLIC SPHERE, 1640-1725 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Larry Alexander Skillin, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Dr. John L. Brooke, Advisor Dr. Alan Gallay Dr. David Cressy Copyright By Larry Alexander Skillin 2009 ABSTRACT My dissertation explores the output of the colonial American printing press in its formative years, noting a transformation over time that opened doors to wider participation in public affairs. During its first half century, the press was used solely as an outlet for official pronouncements and proclamations that were designed to be passively read and accepted by the people. Beginning in the late 1680s, new presses in rival jurisdictions, religious controversies, and political revolutions provided a new context for authors and printers, who began issuing a greater variety of documents in previously suppressed genres. As authority splintered, multiple perspectives on religious and political matters appeared in dialogue with one another via controversial pamphlets, asking readers to serve as arbiters and participants in shaping public opinion. Such links between communications, public opinion and the rise of democratic institutions are critical to the emergence of the public sphere, a phenomenon once exclusively discussed in the context of the late eighteenth century in Revolutionary Europe and America. Recent scholarship on early-modern England, however, has discovered links between press expansion and religious and political controversies dating back to the sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Texts and Themes in American Puritan Preaching, 1630- 1700
    Andrews Uniuersity Seminary Studies, Summer 1983, Vol. 21, No. 2, 113-128. Copyright @ 1983 by Andrews University Press. BIBLICAL TEXTS AND THEMES IN AMERICAN PURITAN PREACHING, 1630- 1700 ALLEN CARDEN Biola University La Mirada, California 90639 While the American Puritans and their sermonic literature have been studied perhaps more thoroughly than most other topics in American church history, some basic questions still remain that have not been dealt with either accurately or sufficiently. Two such questions will be the focus of this article: (1) Did the Puritan clergy preach predominantly from the OT or from the NT? (2) Are there any thematic patterns discernible in their preaching, and if so, what are they? Data for this study consist of 466 extant sermons and theo- logical treatises in sermon form preached and written between 1630 and 1700 in the five Massachusetts towns of Boston, Cambridge, Dedham, Dorchester, and Roxbury. These five communities were selected because their early founding (prior to 1640) permits an analysis of the sermons of three generations of clergy prior to 1700. The year 1700 was selected as an appropriate ending date, since it was the seventeenth century that contained the era of Puritan religious dominance and exclusiveness in New England. While no claim is made that the sermon sample includes every extant sermon from these towns, I believe that a large majority of such sermons have been included. 1. OT and NT Usage It has been assumed by at least one Puritan scholar, Emory Elliott, that the selection of sermon texts from the NT indicated sermons dealing with "mercy and grace" and a "gentle, loving, and protective Christ," while sermon texts from the OT dealt with "the image of the angry and 'wrathful God the Father." Elliott arrives 'Emory Elliott, Power and the Pulpit in Puritan New England (Princeton, 1975), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Puritans Q with a Guide to Modern Reprints
    Meet the Puritans q With a Guide to Modern Reprints Joel R. Beeke and Randall J. Pederson Reformation Heritage Books Grand Rapids, Michigan With heartfelt appreciation to my faithful United Kingdom friends for your spiritual fellowship, your open pulpits and open homes, and your invitations to speak at conferences in the homeland of the Puritans David and Elisabeth George Erroll and Lynn Hulse Peter and Jill Masters David and Shona Murray Iain and Jean Murray Robert and Rachel Oliver Maurice and Sandra Roberts Ken and Rosemary Stockley John and Margaret Thackway Geoff and Iola Thomas Malcolm and Jill Watts Andrew and Joan Woolsey —JRB q To my dear Sarah, for all her love and support, and to my parents, Gary and Rosamary Pederson, for their encouragement through the years —RJP Contents q Preface . .vii Illustrations . xx Abbreviations and Addresses of Publishers . .xxii Puritan Biographies and Book Reviews . .1 A Brief History of English Puritanism Thomas Adams Henry Ainsworth Henry Airay Joseph Alleine Richard Alleine Vincent Alsop Isaac Ambrose William Ames Robert Asty Sir Richard Baker William Bates Richard Baxter Lewis Bayly Paul Baynes Robert Bolton Samuel Bolton John Boys Anne Bradstreet William Bridge Thomas Brooks John Bunyan Anthony Burgess Jeremiah Burroughs Nicholas Byfield viii MEET THE PURITANS Thomas Cartwright Joseph Caryl Thomas Case Stephen Charnock David Clarkson Thomas Cobbet Elisha Coles John Cotton Tobias Crisp John Davenant Arthur Dent Edward Dering Thomas Doolittle George Downame John Downame Daniel Dyke Jonathan
    [Show full text]
  • Increase Mather's Friends: the Trans-Atlantic Congregational Network Ofthe Seventeenth Century FRANCIS J
    Increase Mather's Friends: The Trans-Atlantic Congregational Network ofthe Seventeenth Century FRANCIS J. BREMER IT HAS BECOME fashionable for colonial historians to em- phasize the similarities between English and New England societies ofthe seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Scholars such as Timoth H. Breen and David G. Allen have demon- strated the persistence of English communal institutions and values in New World settings.^ Investigators of ideology have shown that much ofthe thought of America's eighteenth-cen- tury revolutionaries was inspired by the English Common- wealth tradition.2 Studies have demonstrated that throughout An earlier version of this paper was delivered to the Columbia University Seminar in Early American Historj'. Research was assisted by grants from the American Philo- sophical Society, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the American Council of Leamed Societies, and the Millersville University Academic Research Committee. This paper is part of a larger study ofthe tran.s-Atîantic Puritan network which will trace the Congregational connection from its origins in England in the early seven- teenth century to the formation of the Dissenting Deputies. The author would like to thank Timothy Breen, John Murrin, Alden Vaughan, Michael McGiffcrt, Jeremy Bois- sevain, Patricia Bonomi, Alison Olson, and Daniel Richter for suggestions and encouragement. ' Timothy H. Breen, Puritans and Adventurers: Changes and Persistence in Early America (New York, 1980); David G. Allen, In English ffays: The Movement of Societies and the Transferral of English Local Law and Custom to Massachusetts Bay in Ihe Seventeenth Century (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1981). 2 For a review ofthe literature estahlishing the importance of tlie Commonwealth tradition in eighteenth-century American thought see Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • John Cotton and the Work Ethic
    Salve Regina University Digital Commons @ Salve Regina Faculty and Staff - Articles & Papers Faculty and Staff 7-2002 John Cotton and the Work Ethic Lois M. Eveleth [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/fac_staff_pub Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons Eveleth, Lois M., "John Cotton and the Work Ethic" (2002). Faculty and Staff - Articles & Papers. 8. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/fac_staff_pub/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Staff at Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty and Staff - Articles & Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOHN COTTON AND THE WORK-ETHIC Dr. Lois Eveleth Every American knows how to define wealth, does he not? Wealth is money and property. It is assets. It is a strong portfolio, despite the current downturn in the market. If we press the question by asking how much money, property, assets are required of a person to be considered wealthy, an answer is not so easy. One may consider himself wealthy with a net worth of any amount at all, if that amount provides the lifestyle and contentment he seeks. On the other hand, if he be covetous, the estates of one hundred men would not make him content, as the Puritan minister John Cotton wrote. Perhaps knowledge is wealth. Perhaps virtue is. A wisdom which appreciates human existence and experience may also be wealth, perhaps the most difficult of all to acquire.
    [Show full text]