Davis Umn 0130E 10471.Pdf (3.294Mb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Davis Umn 0130E 10471.Pdf (3.294Mb From Hawthorne to History: The Mythologizing of John Endecott A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Abigail F. Davis IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Edward M. Griffin June 2009 copyright Abigail F. Davis 2009 i DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to Dr. Edward M. Griffin advisor, mentor, friend ii ABSTRACT Since the Revolutionary War, American historians, literary artists, and social commentators have undertaken a retroactive search for an acceptable myth of origin predating the Revolution. While the war itself has been endlessly and successfully deployed as a sterling founding moment, that claim alone has proved insufficient for several reasons. First, Americans have long been ambivalent about their pre-Revolution Puritan heritage. The new republic emerging from the revolutionary effort rested on ground previously inhabited by British colonists (and others) since the 1620s, but the colonial past did not readily speak to the feisty, independent, and distinctively AAmerican” self-image that mythologized during and after the war . Additionally, by the 19 th century, when the writing of New England history came prominently into vogue, quite a few pages of the Puritan chapter had become embarrassing. Something else was needed: an event earlier than the shot heard round the world in 1775, and a governing image more manly than the standard figure of the pious Puritans. When Nathaniel Hawthorne =s stories AEndicott and the Red Cross @ and AThe May- Pole of Merry Mount @ entered the nubile world of American literature in the 1830s, Hawthorne seemed to have answered that call. Reaching back to1634, he made historical John Endecott a central fictional figure: a man “wrought of iron” wielding a mighty sword against the idolatrous May-Pole and slashing the red cross from the English flag—precisely the needed image. Typically, Hawthorne’s readers, then and now, have generally missed his ironic signals and interpreted Endecott’s sword-play as the first declaration of independence. Hawthorne’s slippery tone has seldom produced more long-lasting literary and historical consequences than it has in his Endecott stories. This study analyzes their manifestations in a gallery of colonial and American historians, annalist, and folklorists (Hutchinson, Johnson, Parkman, Bancroft, Motley, Felt, Drake), through Longfellow and Whittier, to scholarly and family biographies of Endecott, and into the 20 th century in Lowell’s plays and the Merry Mount opera of Hanson and Stokes. Endecott’s case dramatizes literature’s power to perform “cultural work” by trumping history when a nation needs to create its myths of origin from accounts of a dubious past. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures v Introduction 1 CHAPTER ONE: HAWTHORNE AND ENDECOTT 1830-1838 7 1. “The May-Pole of Merry Mount” (1836) 2. “Endicott and the Red Cross” (1838) 3. “The Gentle Boy” (1832) 4. Conclusion CHAPTER TWO: HISTORY, LEGEND & FOLKLORE: THE SHADOWS OF JOHNSON AND HAWTHORNE FALL UPON 19 TH CENTURY HISTORIANS AND FOLKLORISTS 69 1. Introduction: Accountability and Erasure 2. The Problem with Historical Truth 3. Colonial Historians Edward Johnson, Thomas Morton, and Thomas Hutchinson on Endecott: A Fit Instrument or Great Swelling Fellow? 4. The Imaginative Historians: Parkman, Bancroft, Motley 5. The Anthologists as Historians: Griswold and the Duyckink Brothers to the American Literature Survey 6. Endecott in Legends, Annals & Folklore: Drake, Felt, Hawkes, the Flag, and the U.S. Congress iv CHAPTER THREE: ENDECOTT’S TEMPTATION: WHITTIER, LONGFELLOW, AND THE QUAKERS 125 1. Introduction 2. John Greenleaf Whittier (1802-1892) 3. Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (1807-1882) 4. Conclusion CHAPTER FOUR: THE LURE OF GENEALOGY 157 1. Story as Primogeniture 2. The Irony of John Endecott’s Offspring 3. Biography, Glory & Honor 4. Portraiture as Historical Artifact 5. Myth, Blasted: The Future of Family Memoir CHAPTER FIVE: ENDECOTT ON STAGE IN THE 20 TH CENTURY 195 1. Introduction 2. Merry Mount: The Opera 3. The Old Glory EPILOGUE: JOHN ENDECOTT’S SWORD 226 1. The History of the Sword: 1634-1991 2. The Search for the Sword: 2003 3. The Search Continued: 2009 4. Conclusion Bibliography 236 v LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 Portrait of John Endecott 96 2.2 The British Union Jack and the Flag of England 116 2.3 1600 flag of the British East India Company 116 2.4 Flag of the British Virgin Islands 116 2.5 English Red Ensign 116 2.6 Flag of New Zealand 117 2.7 Flag of Scotland 117 4.1 Portrait of John Endecott 157 4.2 Portrait of John Endecott 157 4.3 Portrait of John Endecott 157 4.4 Judge’s Cave, New Haven, CT 173 4.5 John Endecott: Image from an unidentified copy of Magnalia Christi Americana 187 4.6 John Endecott: From the portrait painted in Boston in 1665 and now in possession of William Crowninshield Endicott 188 4.7 Reproduction by Michele Felice Corne, 1802, now in possession of the American Antiquarian Society 188 4.8 Copy by T. Mitchell after the portrait in the Council Chamber, Boston. In possession of the Essex Institute, Salem, MA 189 4.9 Image from www.mass.gov: “Portrait by an unknown artist, 1665" 190 4.10 An unidentified copy from www.salemfocus.com 190 4.11 Image from www.hawthorneinsalem.com 191 4.12 One of two dissimilar copies by James Frothingham 191 Epilogue.1 English flag with Red Cross of St. George 226 Epilogue.2 John Endecott’s sword 229 1 Introduction Since the Revolutionary War, American historians, literary artists, and social commentators have undertaken a retroactive search for an acceptable myth of origin that predates the Revolution. While the war itself has been endlessly and successfully deployed as a sterling founding moment, that claim alone has proved insufficient for several reasons. First, Americans—especially those of white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant heritage—have been ambivalent about their pre-Revolution Puritan heritage nearly since the last pumpkin-shell haircut grew out. The new republic that emerged from the revolutionary effort was built on ground that had been inhabited by British colonists (and others) since the 1620s, but the colonial past did not readily speak to the feisty, independent, and distinctively AAmerican” self-image that mythologized during and after the war . Additionally, by the nineteenth century, when the writing of New England history came prominently into vogue, quite a few pages of the Puritan chapter had become embarrassing. America, alas, did not suddenly materialize in 1776, like Athena bursting fully formed from the head of Zeus, although that transformation would have been very convenient. Something else was needed: an event earlier than the shot heard round the world in 1775, and a governing image more manly than the standard figure of the pious Puritans. 2 When Nathaniel Hawthorne =s stories AEndicott and the Red Cross @ and AThe May- Pole of Merry Mount @ entered the nubile world of American literature in the 1830s, Hawthorne seemed to have answered that call. He had reached back to 1634, positioning John Endecott as central figure in those fictions, calling him a man “wrought of iron,” supplying him with a mighty sword to wield against the idolatrous May-Pole and to slash against the red cross in the flag of England, and suggesting that Endecott’s attack on the flag was the first blow to prefigure the eventual American revolt from the mother country more than two centuries later. It was precisely the image that was needed . As was so often the case with Hawthorne, readers missed his ironic signals and interpreted Endecott’s sword-play as a deadly serious (and historically accurate) moment in American history- making, and this study demonstrates that Hawthorne’s slippery tone has seldom produced more long-lasting literary and historical consequences than it has in his Endecott stories. Endecott was perfect for several reasons. Before being immortalized by Hawthorne, Endecott was a historical personage—the first Governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1628—about whom little was known prior to his arrival in New England at the age of forty, the gap in his background thus providing a gap in the record that could be filled selectively and often apocryphally with Endecott’s alleged deeds, ideology, and, despite his Puritanism, demonstrations of hot-headed manliness. Combined with this absence of verifiable personal information was the fact that Endecott conveniently wrote almost nothing, even during the seventeen years he served as governor of the Bay Colony. Hence, he was ripe for imaginative creation as a character in fiction. I suggest that the incorporation of Endecott is a process of cultural reinvention that relies on either 3 rendering past events “accountable @ or erasing them from public memory. 1 The appropriation of Endecott enabled the creation of a national literary narrative including the highlights of America’s colonial past while ignoring the embarrassments, such as Endecott’s persecution of the Quakers. The construction of the governing myth was necessarily a two-step process: the American Revolution was the nation’s myth of origin, and the revolution’s myth of origin was the red cross incident. The search for myths of origin bears upon the uneasy dance that has ensued in recent years between theorists regarding America =s status as either colonized or colonizer. Edward Watts argues persuasively in Writing and Postcolonialism in the Early Republic that a country can be both at once. 2 Watts correctly points out that the debate about the nation =s ambivalence toward its colonial legacy has never been resolved. 3 Moreover, the symptoms of America =s cultural anxiety over the issue of its colonial origins have taken many forms. The construct of particular interest in this study is the demonstrated power of literature to distort the historical record.
Recommended publications
  • TOL Xm. NO. 9.} ROCHESTER, NY
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Newspapers Collection 3N"O. mOXJR CENTS. TWO DOH.IJ.A.RS A. "PROGRESS -AJSTD iMPROYEMBNT. TOL Xm. NO. 9.} ROCHESTER, N. Y.,-FOR THE WEEK ENDDTG SATURDAY, MARCH 1, 1862. {WHOLE NO. 633. the evil. To ta^x unproductive property was wrong Mr. RANDALL replied that the English required MOORE'S RURAL NEW-YORKER, in principle. You must tax productive property in dogs for watching, &c, as they had no fences, but THE LEADING AMERICAN WEEKLY order that the owner may be able to pay. that their Sporting and hunting dogs were kept con- BUBAL, LITEBABY AND FAMILY NEWSPAPER Mr. E. SHEREILL, of Ontario, was surprised to fined—not allowed to roam, at large. Mr. R. (in reply to a remark by Mr. CONGER,) stated that not CONDUCTED BY D. D. T. MOORE, hear Judge* Ot oppose the tax law. He was in favor ] of taxing dogs, and related instances in which the one American wool-grower in fifty kept a Shepherd With an Able Corps of Assistants and Contributors. poor class of whelps and sheep-killers had destroyed dog. He had just returned from a visit among the sheep-breeders and wool-growers of Vermont Mr. CHA8. D. BBAQDON, Western Corresponding Editor. flocks of sheep in his locality. Mr. S. would tax every dog $5, and more if necessary to exterminate HAMMOND, and other leading sheep men, had no Shepherd dogs; indeed he did not see one in Ver- THE RUKAL NBW-YORKER is designed to be unsurpassed in the race of whelps.
    [Show full text]
  • Garrett Byrne Interviewer: John Stewart Date of Interview: September 28, 1967 Location: Boston, Massachusetts Length: 46 Pages
    Garrett Byrne, Oral History Interview—9/28/1967 Administrative Information Creator: Garrett Byrne Interviewer: John Stewart Date of Interview: September 28, 1967 Location: Boston, Massachusetts Length: 46 pages Biographical Note Byrne, a Massachusetts political figure and District Attorney, Suffolk County (1952- 1978), discusses John F. Kennedy’s (JFK) campaigns for the House of Representatives, Senate, and presidency; JFK’s relationships with other Massachusetts Democrats, including Foster Furcolo and John William McCormack; and JFK’s influence on Massachusetts political races, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed on April 6, 1970, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form.
    [Show full text]
  • MASSACHUSETTS: Or the First Planters of New-England, the End and Manner of Their Coming Thither, and Abode There: in Several EPISTLES (1696)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Joshua Scottow Papers Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 1696 MASSACHUSETTS: or The first Planters of New-England, The End and Manner of their coming thither, and Abode there: In several EPISTLES (1696) John Winthrop Governor, Massachusetts Bay Colony Thomas Dudley Deputy Governor, Massachusetts Bay Colony John Allin Minister, Dedham, Massachusetts Thomas Shepard Minister, Cambridge, Massachusetts John Cotton Teaching Elder, Church of Boston, Massachusetts See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow Part of the American Studies Commons Winthrop, John; Dudley, Thomas; Allin, John; Shepard, Thomas; Cotton, John; Scottow, Joshua; and Royster,, Paul Editor of the Online Electronic Edition, "MASSACHUSETTS: or The first Planters of New- England, The End and Manner of their coming thither, and Abode there: In several EPISTLES (1696)" (1696). Joshua Scottow Papers. 7. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joshua Scottow Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors John Winthrop; Thomas Dudley; John Allin; Thomas Shepard; John Cotton; Joshua Scottow; and Paul Royster, Editor of the Online Electronic Edition This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ scottow/7 ABSTRACT CONTENTS In 1696 there appeared in Boston an anonymous 16mo volume of 56 pages containing four “epistles,” written from 66 to 50 years earlier, illustrating the early history of the colony of Massachusetts Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • A Copy of the Last Will and Testament of Richard Bellingham, Esqr. Late
    A copy of the last will and testament of Richard Bellingham, Esqr. Late governour of the Colony of Massachusetts-Bay in New England and some arguments to prove this was the said governours last will and was proved and approved as such, and ought to continue valid against the attempts of all that would nullify the same. Published by the Reverend Mr. James Allen [1721]. Given me by Mr. S. Stoddard, Augt. 6. 1706. A Copy of the Last Will and Testament of Richard Bellingham Esqr. Late Governour of the Colony of the Massachusetts-Bay in New-England. And some Arguments to prove this was the said Governours last Will, and was Proved and Approved as such, and ought to continue valid against the Attempts of all that would Nullify the same. Published by the Reverend Mr. James Allen, one of the Executors in said Will named. Governour Bellingham his Will, Lib.7.f.271. AMong many other undeserved Favours of God towards me, this is none of the least, That so long a time I have Lived under the special Government of Christ in his Church, not without some Soul satisfaction thro' the Gracious Presence of Christ who walks in the midst of these Churches, which I judge to have been Constituted according to his mind. That I may testifie the Engagement of my heart to the Lord, being of perfect Memory and understanding, do Dispose my Temporal Estate wherewith the Lord hath blessed me, by this my Last Will as followeth, Viz. I Do give to my Beloved Wife the Rent of that Farm Nicholas Rice liveth in, to be paid to her duely after my Decease, also my Dwelling-House, with the Yard and Field adjoining, during her natural Life.
    [Show full text]
  • Destiny Again Calls to a Kennedy Uncanny Parallel
    lA Sunday, Feb. 16, 1969 THE WASHINGTON P031 4 Destiny Again Calls to a Kennedy Uncanny Parallel Betiveen Senator, Late Brother Seen By Leroy F. Aarons Washkitten Pima Stiff Writer BOSTON—The year is 1969, the state is Massachusetts, but the visitor from 'New York has to blink twice at the political landscape to avoid the eerie feeling that he had somehow been there before. Here is a Kennedy. seemingly des- tined for the White House, still merg- KEN O'DONNELL ing from the depths of melancholy over a slain brother, trying to preside . open headquarters over a divided and fratricidal state FRANCIS X. BELLOTTI Party whose leaders regard him with . perennial candidate an ambivalence compounded of jeal- ousy, love, fear and respect. Here, too, is a Kennedy anxious to forge a base of strength and unity in his home state where Democrats have been almost entirely excluded from top elective offices, yet deterred by a traditional reluctance to be drawn into a furnace of conflicting local ambi- tions. One can go on. The parallels be- tween the situation of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy in Massachusetts today and those of his late brother, Robert, in New York prior to the 1968 election year, are so close as to be uncanny. Same Sense of Destiny Perhaps more than anything else, there is the same sense of higher des- KEVIN H. WHITE tiny prevailing the local political air. his image is eyed In New York all Bobby Kennedy had ENDICOTT PEABODY to do was show up at a ward politi- cian's dinner and the papers would .
    [Show full text]
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial
    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Cloherty Interviewer: John F
    Peter Cloherty Oral History Interview—9/29/1967 Administrative Information Creator: Peter Cloherty Interviewer: John F. Stewart Date of Interview: September 29, 1967 Length: 53 pages (NOTE: There were two pages numbered “20” in the original transcript. These have been changed to 20 and 20a.) Biographical Note Cloherty was a Massachusetts political figure, campaign worker during John F. Kennedy’s (JFK) first congressional campaign (1946), a delegate, (1952, 1956) and an alternate delegate (1960) during the Democratic National Convention. In this interview he discusses JKF’s 1946 congressional campaign, Boston Mayor James Michael Curley, and differences within the Democratic Party, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions Copyright of these materials have passed to the United States Government upon the death of the interviewee. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Gay Sinners and Grizzly Saints Keweloh, Carina
    Of Gay Sinners and Grizzly Saints Keweloh, Carina In: Student Journal of the Department of Anglophone Studies / Volume 1 (2018) This text is provided by DuEPublico, the central repository of the University Duisburg-Essen. This version of the e-publication may differ from a potential published print or online version. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/47604 URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:464-20181123-141434-3 Link: https://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de:443/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=47604 License: As long as not stated otherwise within the content, all rights are reserved by the authors / publishers of the work. Usage only with permission, except applicable rules of german copyright law. Source: This essay was initially submitted as a term paper in the BA seminar “Religion in American Culture” and supervised by Dr Melissa Knox-Raab. Published in Student Journal of the Department of Anglophone Studies (Vol. 1, 2018) Of Gay Sinners and Grizzly Saints Fundamentalism in “The May-Pole of Merry Mount” CARINA KEWELOH1 Nathaniel Hawthorne’s stories often depict Puritans as superstitious, intolerant, patriarchal and oppressive, which led to the belief he held a negative attitude towards them. However, “The May-Pole of Merry Mount”2 suggests that this resentment is not specifically directed towards Puritans. Hawthorne’s short story rather exposes the dangers of fundamentalism in general. This essay scrutinizes both the portrayal of the community of Merry Mount and the Puritans in the short story to explore the features of fundamentalism they depict. Finally, the restricting and impairing effects of both fundamentalist communities will be assessed using the example of Edgar and Edith, the young couple at the center of Hawthorne’s tale.
    [Show full text]
  • EASTMAN NOTES JUNE 2004 Draft: Final Date: 6/15/2004 INSIDE
    NOTES JUNE 2004 A MAGAZINE FOR ALUMNI OF THE EASTMAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC FROM THE EDITOR The right “stu≠” Dear Eastman Alumni: We like Notes’ new look, and it seems you do too. Response has been unani- mously favorable; perhaps we should consider a Steve Boerner–David Cowles NOTES presidential ticket for 2008. I’d vote for them; these two artists made “Notes Volume 22, Number 2 nouveau” a pleasure, and I’m glad the pleasure was conveyed in the magazine June 2004 itself. I write the stuff, but they (and our photographers) make it look good! We also had a tremendous response to our “Eastman Alumni on CD” feature; Editor see pages 33¬34. And enough of you commented on different editorial aspects of David Raymond Notes (not always favorably) that we have a “Letters to the Editor” section, which Assistant editor may be a first for us. Christina Casey This issue of Notes is admittedly filled with history, but Susan Conkling’s re- Contributing writers minder of the great women who shaped both American music and Eastman, and Martial Bednar Amy Blum Paul Burgett’s reminder of four black composers who Christine Corrado played an important part in Eastman history, are stories Contributing photographers worth telling. As is the story of the success of Howard Kurt Brownell Hanson’s Merry Mount at the Met in 1934—a remarkable Gelfand-Piper Photography event, when you think about it. I should add a special Bob Klein Photography word of thanks here to David Peter Coppen, the Sibley Carlos Ortiz Don Ver Ploeg/VP Communications Library Archivist, who is always helpful with providing Amy Vetter historical photographs and other materials for Notes, but Photography coordinator outdid himself for these three articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Day Quincy, Massachusetts, in the 1620S
    CHAPTER TWO THOMAS MORTON Charlotte Carrington Thomas Morton established the Ma-re Mount settlement, near modern- day Quincy, Massachusetts, in the 1620s. Morton, an Anglican gentleman and lawyer, freed the servants at the plantation in order to trade and plant as equals. The Mortonites erected a maypole and embraced Old English traditions, which vexed the Pilgrims and Puritans. Morton, who was ban- ished from New England more than once, is primarily remembered as a marginal licentious anti-type to his Puritan opponents. This article addresses Morton’s disregarded side of the story, his numerous voyages across the Atlantic and the identities that he fashioned. In New England, Morton was a victim of Puritan persecution; he was arraigned fallaciously for trading guns to the American Indians and murder. He was whipped, imprisoned, banished and his property was sequestered. Morton operated entirely from outside of the ‘Puritan worldview’ and proffered an alterna- tive vision for the New World. However, across the ocean, Morton employed his flair with a pen and legal dexterity to challenge the Colony’s charter and put himself in a position of authority. Therefore, in order to truly place Morton at the center of the narrative, we must examine the life of this sojourner on both sides of the Atlantic. This article follows the voyages of Thomas Morton across the Atlantic between Old and New England in the early seventeenth century. In terms of identity formation, Morton is of interest precisely because he defies easy categorization. Morton illustrates that identities in an Atlantic world were multi-faceted and tailored to circumstance.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Morton As America's First Behavioral Observer (In New England 1624-1646)
    Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1987, 25(1), (I}-,72 Thomas Morton as America's first behavioral observer (in New England 1624-1646) PHILIP HOWARD GRAY Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana As a falconer and lawyer in England, Thomas Morton was well trained to become the first be­ havioral observer in America. From his arrival in Massachusetts in 1624 to his forced removal in 1628 (he offended the Pilgrims by intercepting the beaver trade and offended the Puritans by refusing to accept their authority), he made many observations on the region's animals and Indians. These observations were collected in his book, published in 1637. Criticisms of Morton by the New England theocrats have been endlessly repeated by historians who fail to recognize Morton's value as an amateur psychologist and ethologist, and a very early one at that. Thomas Morton, gentleman, lawyer, sportsman, and tribes of William Bradford, who believed Morton to be pioneer settler in Massachusetts, lived among the Indians, guilty of everything from selling guns to the Indian men noted their manners and customs, hunted, traded, and to dancing around the maypole with Indian women, treat­ made friends with them. Equally important, Morton was ing the latter "most filthily" (Davis, 1908, p. 238). This an eager observer and cataloguer of the animals of the type of complaint is echoed by Adams (1892, p. 170), woods, skies, and sea. This information was collected dur­ who called Morton an old debauchee, tippler, and reck­ ing the first two decades of New England's colonization less libertine with neither morals nor religion, and An­ and set down in his New English Canaan or New Canaan, drews (1934), who extended Morton's presumed lack of published in Amsterdam in 1637 and readily available in morals to both conduct and thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Providence in the Life of John Hull: Puritanism and Commerce in Massachusetts Bay^ 16^0-1680
    Providence in the Life of John Hull: Puritanism and Commerce in Massachusetts Bay^ 16^0-1680 MARK VALERI n March 1680 Boston merchant John Hull wrote a scathing letter to the Ipswich preacher William Hubbard. Hubbard I owed him £347, which was long overdue. Hull recounted how he had accepted a bill of exchange (a promissory note) ftom him as a matter of personal kindness. Sympathetic to his needs, Hull had offered to abate much of the interest due on the bill, yet Hubbard still had sent nothing. 'I have patiently and a long time waited,' Hull reminded him, 'in hopes that you would have sent me some part of the money which I, in such a ftiendly manner, parted with to supply your necessities.' Hull then turned to his accounts. He had lost some £100 in potential profits from the money that Hubbard owed. The debt rose with each passing week.' A prominent citizen, militia officer, deputy to the General Court, and affluent merchant, Hull often cajoled and lectured his debtors (who were many), moralized at and shamed them, but never had he done what he now threatened to do to Hubbard: take him to court. 'If you make no great matter of it,' he warned I. John Hull to William Hubbard, March 5, 1680, in 'The Diaries of John Hull,' with appendices and letters, annotated by Samuel Jennison, Transactions of the American Anti- quarian Society, II vols. (1857; repn. New York, 1971), 3: 137. MARK \i\LERi is E. T. Thompson Professor of Church History, Union Theological Seminary, Richmond, Virginia.
    [Show full text]