DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Condition Assessment, Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resource Condition Assessment, Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve Natural Resource Report NPS/UCBN/NRR—2012/602 ON THE COVER Map and Photographs of Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve located in south-central Idaho with insets of pictures acquired from the website at: www.nps.gov/crmo/index.htm and from Northwest Management, Inc. Natural Resource Condition Assessment Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve Natural Resource Report NPS/UCBN/NRR—2012/602 John A. Erixson Northwest Management, Inc. P.O. Box 9748 Moscow, ID 83843 Mark V. Corrao Northwest Management Inc. P.O. Box 9748 Moscow, ID 83843 December 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Data in this report were collected and analyzed using methods based on established, peer-reviewed protocols and were analyzed and interpreted within the guidelines of the protocols. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the Upper Columbia Basin Network Web site (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/ucbn/) and the Natural Resource Publications Management Web site (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). Please cite this publication as: Erixson, J. A. and M. V. Corrao. 2012. Natural resource condition assessment: Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve. Natural Resource Report NPS/UCBN/NRR— 2012/602. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 131/118223, December 2012 ii Contents Page Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v Tables ........................................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... xiii Prologue ...................................................................................................................................... xiii Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................... xv Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope ..................................................................................................................... 1 NRCA Background .................................................................................................................... 2 Study Area .................................................................................................................................. 3 Historical Setting ........................................................................................................................ 6 Natural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 7 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 21 NRCA Project Scoping ............................................................................................................ 21 GIS and Geodatabases.............................................................................................................. 22 NPS Data Sources .................................................................................................................... 24 Natural Resources .................................................................................................................... 25 Results .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................... 29 Wildlife Inventories ................................................................................................................. 35 Wildlife Monitoring ................................................................................................................. 39 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................ 65 Water Resources....................................................................................................................... 69 Geology and Soils .................................................................................................................... 74 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... 87 Land Use .................................................................................................................................. 94 Climate ................................................................................................................................... 106 iii Contents (continued Page Summary Discussion and Recommendations ......................................................................... 115 Fire ......................................................................................................................................... 115 Water Resources..................................................................................................................... 116 Animal Resources .................................................................................................................. 117 Vegetation Classification and Mapping ................................................................................. 118 Threatened, Endangered, Sensitive, and Species of Special Concern (TESS) ...................... 119 Non-native Plant Species, Invasive Plant Species, and/or Noxious Weeds ........................... 121 Climate Change ...................................................................................................................... 124 General Threats and Stressors ................................................................................................ 125 Data Gaps ............................................................................................................................... 126 Management Action Recommendations ................................................................................ 127 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................................ 129 iv Figures Page Figure 1. Map of CRMO in Central Idaho. .................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. Number of visitors to CRMO between 1945 to 2009 . ................................................... 6 Figure 3. Lava flows within CRMO. ............................................................................................. 9 Figure 4. Map of existing vegetation types at CRMO. ................................................................ 12 Figure 5. Map of the CRMO subwatershed. ................................................................................ 17 Figure 6. Screen capture of the ArcMap Project file for the CRMO project area. ...................... 23 Figure 7. American Pika Inventory Data for CRMO, 2007-2009. .............................................. 44 Figure 8. Pygmy Rabbit Field Observation Location. ................................................................. 48 Figure 9. Pronghorn Observations Documented Within CRMO. ................................................ 51 Figure 10. Greater Sage-grouse Lek Data. ................................................................................... 55 Figure 11. Location of Greater
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Texas Co-Op Power • March 2017
    LOCAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE EDITION MARCH 2017 Blizzard of ’57 Spring Vegetable Salads Palo Duro Pageant 35 35on Brake-worthy stops on highway through co-op country THE TRACTOR THAT STARTED IT ALL. IS CHANGING IT ALL. Metal Hood, Fenders New Deluxe Seat** New Swift-TTaach Loader** New Grille Guard New Dash Panel & Operator Platform & Tilt Steering Wheel & Swift-Connect Backhoe & Front Hitch & Display ALL-NEWW KUBOTTAA BX80 SERIES Low-Rate, Long-TTeerm Financing 6 YYeear Goingg On Noww! Limited Powertrain Warrantyy* kubota.com *Only terms and conditions of Kubota’s standard Limited Warranty applyy.. For warranty terms, see Kubota’s Limited Warranty at www.kubota.com or authorized Kubota Dealers. **Only avvaailable on certain models. Optional equipment may be shown. © Kubota TTrractor Corporation, 2017 Since 1944 March 2017 FAVORITES 5 Letters 6 Currents 18 Local Co-op News Get the latest information plus energy and safety tips from your cooperative. 29 Texas History Panhandle Blizzard of 1957 By Dawn Stephens 31 Recipes Spring Vegetable Salads 35 Focus on Texas Photo Contest: In Motion 36 Around Texas List of Local Events 38 Hit the Road Texas on a Grand Stage in Palo Duro By Sheryl Smith-Rodgers Marker near the northern end ONLINE of Interstate 35 in Texas, just TexasCoopPower.com south of the Red River Find these stories online if they don’t appear in your edition of the magazine. FEATURE Texas USA Odessa Meteor Crater 35 on 35 8 Stops with fascinating food, history and popular By E.R. Bills culture lure travelers from the interstate as it weaves Observations through Texas from Mexico to Oklahoma Another Roadside Attraction Story and photos by Julia Robinson By Ryann Ford ROAD TRIP! See video and photos at TexasCoopPower.com NEXT MONTH Drones: An Overview Texas inno- vators, including electric co-ops, hone drones as tools of today.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Abulfeda crater chain (Moon), 97 Aphrodite Terra (Venus), 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 Acheron Fossae (Mars), 165 Apohele asteroids, 353–354 Achilles asteroids, 351 Apollinaris Patera (Mars), 168 achondrite meteorites, 360 Apollo asteroids, 346, 353, 354, 361, 371 Acidalia Planitia (Mars), 164 Apollo program, 86, 96, 97, 101, 102, 108–109, 110, 361 Adams, John Couch, 298 Apollo 8, 96 Adonis, 371 Apollo 11, 94, 110 Adrastea, 238, 241 Apollo 12, 96, 110 Aegaeon, 263 Apollo 14, 93, 110 Africa, 63, 73, 143 Apollo 15, 100, 103, 104, 110 Akatsuki spacecraft (see Venus Climate Orbiter) Apollo 16, 59, 96, 102, 103, 110 Akna Montes (Venus), 142 Apollo 17, 95, 99, 100, 102, 103, 110 Alabama, 62 Apollodorus crater (Mercury), 127 Alba Patera (Mars), 167 Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), 110 Aldrin, Edwin (Buzz), 94 Apophis, 354, 355 Alexandria, 69 Appalachian mountains (Earth), 74, 270 Alfvén, Hannes, 35 Aqua, 56 Alfvén waves, 35–36, 43, 49 Arabia Terra (Mars), 177, 191, 200 Algeria, 358 arachnoids (see Venus) ALH 84001, 201, 204–205 Archimedes crater (Moon), 93, 106 Allan Hills, 109, 201 Arctic, 62, 67, 84, 186, 229 Allende meteorite, 359, 360 Arden Corona (Miranda), 291 Allen Telescope Array, 409 Arecibo Observatory, 114, 144, 341, 379, 380, 408, 409 Alpha Regio (Venus), 144, 148, 149 Ares Vallis (Mars), 179, 180, 199 Alphonsus crater (Moon), 99, 102 Argentina, 408 Alps (Moon), 93 Argyre Basin (Mars), 161, 162, 163, 166, 186 Amalthea, 236–237, 238, 239, 241 Ariadaeus Rille (Moon), 100, 102 Amazonis Planitia (Mars), 161 COPYRIGHTED
    [Show full text]
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P
    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • (50000) Quaoar, See Quaoar (90377) Sedna, See Sedna 1992 QB1 267
    Index (50000) Quaoar, see Quaoar Apollo Mission Science Reports 114 (90377) Sedna, see Sedna Apollo samples 114, 115, 122, 1992 QB1 267, 268 ap-value, 3-hour, conversion from Kp 10 1996 TL66 268 arcade, post-eruptive 24–26 1998 WW31 274 Archimedian spiral 11 2000 CR105 269 Arecibo observatory 63 2000 OO67 277 Ariel, carbon dioxide ice 256–257 2003 EL61 270, 271, 273, 274, 275, 286, astrometric detection, of extrasolar planets – mass 273 190 – satellites 273 Atlas 230, 242, 244 – water ice 273 Bartels, Julius 4, 8 2003 UB313 269, 270, 271–272, 274, 286 – methane 271–272 Becquerel, Antoine Henry 3 – orbital parameters 271 Biermann, Ludwig 5 – satellite 272 biomass, from chemolithoautotrophs, on Earth 169 – spectroscopic studies 271 –, – on Mars 169 2005 FY 269, 270, 272–273, 286 9 bombardment, late heavy 68, 70, 71, 77, 78 – atmosphere 273 Borealis basin 68, 71, 72 – methane 272–273 ‘Brown Dwarf Desert’ 181, 188 – orbital parameters 272 brown dwarfs, deuterium-burning limit 181 51 Pegasi b 179, 185 – formation 181 Alfvén, Hannes 11 Callisto 197, 198, 199, 200, 204, 205, 206, ALH84001 (martian meteorite) 160 207, 211, 213 Amalthea 198, 199, 200, 204–205, 206, 207 – accretion 206, 207 – bright crater 199 – compared with Ganymede 204, 207 – density 205 – composition 204 – discovery by Barnard 205 – geology 213 – discovery of icy nature 200 – ice thickness 204 – evidence for icy composition 205 – internal structure 197, 198, 204 – internal structure 198 – multi-ringed impact basins 205, 211 – orbit 205 – partial differentiation 200, 204, 206,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • The Vanderbilt Hustler
    www.InsideVandy.com HUSTLER THETHURSDAY, FEBRUARY VANDERBIL 2, 2012 ★ 124TH YEAR, NO. 7 ★ THE VOICE OF VANDERBILT SINCE 1888 T New kids on the block U.S. ambassador talks Egypt, Vanderbilt head coach James Arab spring KATIE KROG Franklin and the SENIOR PRODUCER coaching staff Students, faculty and guests crowded into Buttrick 101 Wednesday evening to listen to celebrated one former U.S. Ambassador to Egypt Margaret Scobey speak. of the best The event, which included a talk and a ques- tion and answer session, focused on Egypt signing classes and the Arab Spring, a series of protests and demonstrations that began in 2010. in Vanderbilt Scobey referred to the Arab Spring as “un- doubtedly the most exciting event of my ca- football history reer.” She added, “It was really just kind of on Wednesday, amazing to see a country of 82 million people rise up and say ‘enough.’ It was a very exciting welcoming 21 time, very momentous, and I think it’s going to have long term impact on a variety of is- new players to sues.” According to Scobey, a key priority for the Nashville. United States is “advancing peace, security K EVIN BARNETT/ THE VANDERBILT HUSTLER and opportunity in the Middle East, not only because of the long-term benefits to the na- signees receiving less tional order and global prosperity, but to the than a three-star rating here-and-now issues that we are confronting.” according to Rivals.com 6’5” Scobey said that these current issues in- 0 average height clude the defeat of al-Qaeda and other extrem- 285 of the six ist groups; the erasure of the spread of nuclear weight of three different signees with offensive line weapons; the promotion of Arab-Israeli peace; offensive line signees the increase of commerce; the countering of offers from other signees aggression; and furthering the spread of de- SEC programs signees who led mocracy and respect for human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Voided Certificate of Employee Information Reports
    Public Contracts Equal Employment Opportunity Compliance Monitoring Program Voided Certificate of Employee Information Report Report run on: June 6, 2017 3:22 PM Name of Company Cert Street City State Zip (PC) 2 HD 37407 245 EAST 30TH NEW YORK CITY NY 10016 1515 BOARDWALK, INC 18317 121 WASHINGTON ST TOMS RIVER NJ 08753 174 NEWARK AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LP 34742 103 EISENHOWER PARKWAY ROSELAND NJ 07068 1993-N2 PROPERTIES, NO. 3 LIMITED PARTNERSHI 19621 12100 WILSHIRE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90025 1ST CALL PAINTING CONTRACTORS, LLC 37000 980-B DEHART PLACE ELIZABETH NJ 07202 3-2-1 QUALITY PRINTING 21779 100 JERSEY AVENUE NEW BRUNSWICK NJ 08901 3-D MFG.-DBA- AMERICAN LA-FRANCE 2831 500 S. AIRPORT ROAD SHAWANO WI 54166 4 FRONT VIDEO DESIGN INC. 22299 1500 BROADWAY #509 NEW YORK NY 10036 55 WASHINGTON STREET LLC 28132 P.O. BOX 66 CLOSTER NJ 07624 9-15 SOUTH MAIN STREET CORP. 20587 1125 ATLANTIC AVE., SUITE 617 ATLANTIC CITY NJ 08401 A & A ENGINEERING 9780 300 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE MANALAPAN NJ 07726 A & B WIPER SUPPLY, INC. 6848 116 FOUNTAIN ST. PHILADELPHIA PA 19127 A & E CARPENTRY, INC. 8048 584 STUDIO RD. RIDGEFIELD NJ 07657 A & L UNIFORMS, L L C 37818 2605 SOUTH BROAD STREET TRENTON NJ 08610 A & P TUTORING, LLC 34701 4201 CHURCH ROAD #242 MT. LAUREL NJ 08054 A & R AUTO SUPPLY, INC. 7169 300 ATLANTIC CITY BLVD. TOMS RIVER NJ 08757 A & S FUEL OIL CO. INC. 25667 95 CALAIS ROAD PO BOX 22 IRONIA NJ 07845 A & W TECHNICAL SALES, INC. 33404 420 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 3 WEST BERLIN NJ 08091 A AND C LABORATORIES, INC 17387 168 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriages 1885-1920
    Chester County Marriages Grooms Index 1885-1930 Groom's Last Name Groom's First Name Middle Name Groom's Date of Birth Groom's Age Bride's First Name Bride's Last Name Date of Application Date of Marriage Place of Marriage License # Aaron J Ward 18 Leonore Harvey January 2, 1926 Green Hill 26191 Aaron Rowland 21 Ethel Brown January 7, 1925 West Chester 25535 Aaronoff Joseph 27 Kathryn Kann December 2, 1915 Lincoln University 18839 Aaronson JosephFebruary 20, 1871 Rosa Kaplan June 5, 1896 5413 Abbott Charles FApril 8, 1874 Elsie Kurts September 24, 1903 Landenberg 10008 Abbott Charles Shewell 24 Margaret Robinson August 6, 1923 Paoli 24532 Abbott Frank EdwardNovember 7, 1862 Beatrice Andrews December 9, 1891 Coatesville 2931 Abbott GeorgeDecember 9, 1876 Elizabeth Scattergood May 5, 1898 West Chester 6442 Abbott James HermanFebruary 19, 1871 Maud Waitneight January 30, 1901 Phoenixville 8156 Abel Charles Boehnke 21 Mabel Barnes March 27, 1929 Honey Brook 29126 Abel Charles William 23 Cora Peters April 21, 1928 Union Presbyterian Church Manse 28004 Abel Howard JOctober 29, 1875 19 Bertha Martin December 10, 1894 Kennett Square 4532 Abel Howard SamuelNovember 14, 1884 Sara Forest February 17, 1906 Brandywine Manor 11674 Abel Joshua MAugust 9, 1863 Kate Haise April 4, 1889 West Chester 1531 Abel William MAugust 9, 1868 Caroline Rigdon March 23, 1904 West Chester 10308 Abernathy John ASeptember 9, 1886 Emma Hall March 13, 1912 Downingtown 16266 Abernathy Samuel COctober 14, 1874 Ethel Chrisman September 19, 1906 Coventryville 12112 Abernathy
    [Show full text]
  • Seismology on Small Planetary Bodies by Orbital Laser Doppler Vibrometry
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Advances in Space Research 64 (2019) 527–544 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr Seismology on small planetary bodies by orbital laser Doppler vibrometry Paul Sava a,⇑, Erik Asphaug b a Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois Street, Golden, CO 80401, USA b Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E University Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 20 October 2018; received in revised form 23 March 2019; accepted 15 April 2019 Available online 24 April 2019 Abstract The interior structure of small planetary bodies holds clues about their origin and evolution, from which we can derive an understand- ing of the solar system’s formation. High resolution geophysical imaging of small bodies can use either radar waves for dielectric prop- erties, or seismic waves for elastic properties. Radar investigation is efficiently done from orbiters, but conventional seismic investigation requires landed instruments (seismometers, geophones) mechanically coupled to the body. We propose an alternative form of seismic investigation for small bodies using Laser Doppler Vibrometers (LDV). LDVs can sense motion at a distance, without contact with the ground, using coherent laser beams reflected off the body. LDVs can be mounted on orbi- ters, transforming seismology into a remote sensing investigation, comparable to making visual, thermal or electromagnetic observations from space. Orbital seismometers are advantageous over landed seismometers because they do not require expensive and complex land- ing operations, do not require mechanical coupling with the ground, are mobile and can provide global coverage, operate from stable and robust orbital platforms that can be made absolutely quiet from vibrations, and do not have sensitive mechanical components.
    [Show full text]
  • Dónal P. O'mathúna · Vilius Dranseika Bert Gordijn Editors
    Advancing Global Bioethics 11 Dónal P. O’Mathúna · Vilius Dranseika Bert Gordijn Editors Disasters: Core Concepts and Ethical Theories Advancing Global Bioethics Volume 11 Series editors Henk A.M.J. ten Have Duquesne University Pittsburgh, USA Bert Gordijn Institute of Ethics Dublin City University Dublin, Ireland The book series Global Bioethics provides a forum for normative analysis of a vast range of important new issues in bioethics from a truly global perspective and with a cross-cultural approach. The issues covered by the series include among other things sponsorship of research and education, scientific misconduct and research integrity, exploitation of research participants in resource-poor settings, brain drain and migration of healthcare workers, organ trafficking and transplant tourism, indigenous medicine, biodiversity, commodification of human tissue, benefit sharing, bio-industry and food, malnutrition and hunger, human rights, and climate change. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/10420 Dónal P. O’Mathúna • Vilius Dranseika Bert Gordijn Editors Disasters: Core Concepts and Ethical Theories Editors Dónal P. O’Mathúna Vilius Dranseika School of Nursing and Human Sciences Vilnius University Dublin City University Vilnius, Lithuania Dublin, Ireland College of Nursing The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USA Bert Gordijn Institute of Ethics Dublin City University Dublin, Ireland This publication is based upon work from COST Action IS1201, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a funding agency for research and innovation networks - www.cost.eu. Our Actions help connect research initiatives across Europe and enable scientists to grow their ideas by sharing them with their peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]