Decapoda, Caridea, Ogyrididae) from Kuwait

Crustaceana 93 (2) 225-235

A NEW SPECIES OF OGYRIDES (DECAPODA, CARIDEA, OGYRIDIDAE) FROM KUWAIT

SAMMY DE GRAVE1,4), MANAL AL-KANDARI2) and ARTHUR ANKER3) 1) Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, United Kingdom 2) Ecosystem-Based Management of Marine Resources, Environment and Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute of Scientiﬁc Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait 3) Universidade Federal de Goiás, Campus Samambaia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas — ICB-5, Av. Esperança, s/n, 74690-900, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

ABSTRACT

A new species of telescope shrimp, Ogyrides sindibadi sp. nov. is described from Kuwait. The new species is morphologically similar to O. striaticauda Kemp, 1915, originally described from Chilka Lake (India), but can be distinguished by the shape of the scaphocerite, the much longer dactylus of the third pereiopod, as well as the shape of the distal margin of the telson.

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Eine neue Art von Teleskop-Garnele, Ogyrides sindibadi sp. nov., ist aufgrund des in Kuwait gesammelten Materials beschrieben. Die neue Art ist morfologisch O. striaticauda Kemp, 1915, die aus Chilka Lake (Indien) beschrieben wurde, sehr ähnlich, unterscheidet sich jedoch von dieser Art in der Form des Antennenschuppe und des Hinterrandes des Telsons, sowie durch die längere Klaue des dritten Pereopoden.

INTRODUCTION

The telescope shrimp genus Ogyrides Stebbing, 1914 is the sole genus in the family Ogyrididae and currently comprises a mere 11 species worldwide, distributed in tropical to temperate waters. In the Atlantic Ocean, two species are known from the western Atlantic, O. alphaerostris (Kingsley, 1880) and O. hayi Williams, 1981, whilst one species, O. rarispina Holthuis, 1951 is known from the tropical eastern Atlantic. Balss (1916) recorded O. occidentalis Ortmann,

4) Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] © The Authors, 2020 DOI 10.1163/15685403-bja10007 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0Downloaded License. from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access 226 SAMMY DE GRAVE, MANAL AL-KANDARI & ARTHUR ANKER

1893 (now considered a synonym of O. alphaerostris) from several locations in West Africa, but Holthuis (1951) considered it likely that these records refer to O. rarispina. Two species are known from the eastern Pacific, O. tarazonai Wicksten & Mendez, 1988 and O. wickstenae Ayón-Parente & Salgado-Barragán, 2013, with additional, probably erroneous records of the western Atlantic O. alphaerostris (Wicksten, 1983; Carvacho & Olson, 1984; Hendrickx & Wicksten, 1987). In the Pacific Ocean, three species are known with certainty only from geographically restricted areas, although for several species records exist far beyond these areas, all of which require confirmation. Ogyrides delli Yaldwyn, 1971 is known from temperate New Zealand and south-eastern Australia (Banner & Ban- ner, 1982), O. striaticauda Kemp, 1915 from Chilka Lake, Cochin and Ennur back- waters in India (Kemp, 1915) and O. saldanhae Barnard, 1947 from temperate South Africa. A further species, O. mjoebergi (Balss, 1921), is known from several disjunct areas, the type material from Cape Jaubert in Western Australia (Balss, 1921), Northern Territory (Bruce & Coombes, 1997), Madagascar (Ledoyer, 1969, 1970), as well as the Mediterranean Sea in the temperate Atlantic, where it is considered to be a Lessepsian migrant (Holthuis & Gottlieb, 1958). However, the true taxonomic status of the Mediterranean records (Galil et al., 2015) needs clarifica- tion. Two further nominal species are known from the Indo-Pacific, O. orientalis (Stimpson, 1860) and O. sibogae (De Man, 1910), the taxonomic status of which is somewhat confused. Although Fujino & Miyake (1970) consider both taxa to be synonyms, Bruce (1990) highlighted the fact that the holotype of O. sibogae was collected from a depth of purportedly 535 m and is unlikely to be a synonym of O. orientalis. With the amount of morphological (and ecological) variation in the material studied by De Man (1910, 1911, 1915, 1922) and assigned to his species, this is also indicative that more than one species could be involved. De Grave & Fransen (2011) followed suit and listed both taxa as currently accepted species. A contrasting view was held by Banner & Banner (1982), who indicated the possibility (without proposing a formal synonymy) that O. sibogae, O. mjoebergi and O. delli could all be synonyms of O. orientalis. This, however, seems unlikely given the morphological disparity of material reported under the names O. orientalis (e.g., Yokoya, 1927; Bruce, 1990) and O. sibogae (e.g., De Man, 1910, 1911). It appears more likely that several more species of Ogyrides await description. Irrespective of possible synonymies, O. orientalis is currently considered to be the most widespread species of the genus in the Indo-Pacific, with modern records from southern Korea (Kim, 1977), northern China (An et al., 2015), Fukushima, Japan (Yokoya, 1927), the East China Sea (Fujino & Miyake, 1970), Hong Kong (Bruce, 1990), Singapore (Anker & De Grave, 2016) and Pakistan (Tirmizi, 1980).

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access OGYRIDES SINDIBADI NOV. 227

However, it is clear that at least some of those records may refer to undescribed species, while others require conﬁrmation. Despite the extensive taxonomic confusion in the genus, we report herein a new species of Ogyrides from Kuwait, which differs in several morphological characters from all other species currently known in the genus. Type material is deposited in the Zoological Collections of the Oxford Univer- sity Museum of Natural History, OUMNH.ZC). Post-orbital carapace length (pocl) was measured from the posterior margin of the orbit to the posterior margin of the carapace.

TAXONOMY

Family OGYRIDIDAE Holthuis, 1955 Ogyrides Stebbing, 1914 Ogyrides sindibadi sp. nov. (ﬁgs. 1-3)

?Ogyrides orientalis (nec Stimpson, 1860) — Grabe & Lees, 1995: 958 — De Grave & Ashelby, 2001: 4. Material examined.— Holotype: female (pocl 3.5 mm), Abu Halifa, Kuwait, 29°08.157’N 48°08.074’E, low intertidal, leg. Mohammed Ali, 04 January 2014, OUMNH.ZC.2020.01.011. Paratypes: male, dissected (pocl 3.2 mm), same collection data, OUMNH.ZC.2020.01.012; male (pocl 2.8 mm), same collection data, OUMNH.ZC.2020.01.013. Description.— Small-sized, slender, elongate shrimp with subcylindrical body. Carapace hirsute (fig. 1A). Rostrum very short (fig. 1A, B), unarmed, obtuse, depressed, tip falling well short of inferior orbital angle in dorsal and lateral views; seven postrostral median teeth (fig. 1C), of equal size, present in anterior third of carapace, flanked by dense row of simple setae; inferior orbital angle bluntly rounded, antennal tooth absent; pterygostomial margin bluntly rounded. Thoracic sternites narrow and unarmed except fourth; fourth with substantial process (thelycum) directed anteriorly (fig. 3C) in both sexes, sides relatively straight, distally bifurcating, sparsely setose. Pleonites hirsute, pleura of first five pleonites broadly rounded; sixth pleuron about same length as fifth. Telson (fig. 3F) somewhat ventrally curved, about 1.5 times length of sixth pleonite, 1.7 times as long as proximal width, lateral margins with broadly angular expansion at 0.4 of length; posterior margin convex, median process lacking, furnished with long, stout, plumose setae; two pairs of posterolateral cuspidate setae (fig. 1G), at 0.75 of telson length, mesial pair about 1.6 as long as lateral pair; dorsal surface with two pairs of short cuspidate setae, inserted at about 0.5 and 0.7

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access 228 SAMMY DE GRAVE, MANAL AL-KANDARI & ARTHUR ANKER

Fig. 1. Ogyrides sindibadi sp. nov. Holotype, female (OUMNH.ZC.2020-01-011): A, carapace, frontal region, lateral; B, same, detail; C, carapace, dorsal. Paratype, male (OUMNH.ZC.2020-01- 012): D, antennule; E, scaphocerite; F, third maxilliped; G, same, tip (denuded). Scale bars indicate 1.0 mm (A, C-D), 0.5 mm (B, D) or 0.25 mm (E-G).

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access OGYRIDES SINDIBADI NOV. 229

Fig. 2. Ogyrides sindibadi sp. nov. Paratype, male (OUMNH.ZC.2020-01-012): A, ﬁrst pereiopod; B, same, chela (denuded); C, second pereiopod; D, same, chela (denuded); E, third pereiopod; F, same, dactylus; G, fourth pereiopod; H, same, dactylus. Scale bar indicates 1.0 mm (A, C, E, G), 0.4 mm (B), 0.25 mm (F, H) or 0.2 mm (D).

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access 230 SAMMY DE GRAVE, MANAL AL-KANDARI & ARTHUR ANKER

Fig. 3. Ogyrides sindibadi sp. nov. Paratype, male (OUMNH.ZC.2020-01-012): A, ﬁfth pereiopod; B, same, dactylus; C, ﬁfth thoracic sternite, sternal process; D, second pleopod, appendix interna and appendix masculina; E, uropod; F, telson; G, same, lateral spines, detail. Holotype, female (OUMNH.ZC.2020-01-011): H, eyes, dorsal. Scale bars indicate 1.0 mm (A, C, H), 0.5 mm (B, F) or 0.25 mm (D-E, G).

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access OGYRIDES SINDIBADI NOV. 231 of length, dorsolateral ridges pronounced; two distinct obliquely transversal ridges proximolaterally. Antennular peduncle slightly overreaching scaphocerite, falling short of proximal margin of cornea; proximal article (fig. 1D) with well-developed stylocerite ending in two sharp projections laterally (fig. 1B), both exceeding mid-length of first article; statocyst unusually conspicuous; mesioventral tooth absent; intermedi- ate article subcylindrical, stout; distal article same; superior flagellum uniramous, with about 19 slender subdivisions, with single distal group of aesthetascs; inferior flagellum uniramous, slightly shorter than upper flagellum. Antenna with square basicerite, with short, subacute, distroventral lobe; scaphocerite (fig. 1E) ovate, almost reaching to end of antennular peduncle, about 2.6 times as long as wide, lamella not produced distally, distolateral tooth strong, overreaching distal margin of lamella; mesial margin densely setose, lateral margin with few shorter, plumose setae. Eyes extremely elongate (figs. 1A, 3H), exceeding length of antennular peduncle by proximal margin of cornea; cornea globular, facetted. Mouthparts not dissected, without specific features. Third maxilliped (fig. 1F) with long slender exopod, densely to sparsely setose; distal article with triangular tip (fig. 1G). First pereiopods (fig. 2A) robust, equal in size, similar in shape; chela (fig. 2B) with palm slightly compressed, about 2.7 times as long as deep; fingers robust, about 1.3 times as long as palm, distal cutting edge of fixed finger with three strong serrations, that of fixed finger with several, short dentations; ischium about 0.7 times as long as merus, carpus subequal to merus; coxa without mastigobranch or setobranch. Second pereiopods (fig. 2C) robust, equal, similar; chela (fig. 2D) with palm slightly compressed, about 2.8 times as long as high, fingers slender, about same length as palm, cutting edges entire, tips hooked; carpus with four subdivisons, about 1.6 times as long as chela, proximal subdivision longest, slender, ratio (from proximal) approximately equal to 1.0 : 0.4 : 0.3 : 0.4; merus about same length as carpus, ischium about 0.7 of carpus; coxa without mastigobranch or setobranch. Third pereiopod (fig. 2E) robust; dactylus (fig. 2F) slender, subcylindrical, about five times as long as proximal width, about 1.3 times as long as propodus, subterminally with tufts of setae; propodus stout, about 2.4 times as long as wide; carpus stout, about 1.7 times as long as propodus; merus about 1.4 times as long as carpus, with single, stout distolateral cuspidate setae; ischium unarmed; coxa without mastigobranch or setobranch. Fourth pereiopod (fig. 2G) longer and slenderer than third; dactylus (fig. 1H) subcylindrical, setose, about 2.5 times as long as wide, weakly excavated on mesial surface; propodus about five times as long as wide; carpus about 1.2 times as long

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access 232 SAMMY DE GRAVE, MANAL AL-KANDARI & ARTHUR ANKER as propodus; merus about 1.8 times as long as carpus, unarmed; ischium about 0.8 times as long as merus; coxa without mastigobranch or setobranch. Fifth pereiopod (fig. 3A) slender, dactylus (fig. 3B) subcylindrical, short, setose; propodus about 3.5 times as long as wide; carpus stout, about 0.7 times as long as propodus; merus unarmed, elongate, about 3.0 times as long as carpus; ischium about 3.2 times as long as merus; coxa without mastigobranch or setobranch. Pleopods typical, not especially modified. Male second pleopod (fig. 3D) with appendix interna and appendix masculina on endopod; appendix masculina short, subcylindrical, with four long, serrulate setae distally; appendix interna long and slender, about twice as long as appendix masculina. Uropods (fig. 3E) with protopodite short, broad, lateral lobe present, rounded, posterolateral angle poorly developed; exopod subequal to telson length, tapering distally, densely setose; endopod about 0.7 of exopod length, densely setose. Etymology.— Named after Sindibad the Sailor (in Arabic spelling), a fictional mariner from the Middle Eastern collection of folk tales “Alf Leila wa-Leila” (“One Thousand and One Nights”). The name thus is to be conceived as a noun in the genitive singular. Type locality.— Abu Halifa, Kuwait (29¡08.157N 48¡08.074E). Distribution.— Currently only known from the type locality, likely more widely distributed in the north-western Indian Ocean. Habitat.— All specimens were collected at low tide on a sandy, gently sloping beach. Remarks.— The type locality of O. orientalis was specified to be “in mari sinensis, et in sinu Kagoshima” by Stimpson (1860). We therefore consider the summary descriptions of Yokoya (1927) and Kim (1977) to be the geographically closest and most likely conspecific, rather than the extensive redescription from Hong Kong in Bruce (1990, which likely refers to an undescribed species. Although the description of Stimpson (1860) is brief, he clearly indicates that four post-rostral teeth are present (“..., dentibus 4-5 minutis antrorsum armata.”), corroborated by the illustrations in Yokoya (1927) and Kim (1977). This character at once separates the new species with seven post-rostral teeth from O. orientalis. The same character also separates the new species from all other Indo-Pacific Ogyrides, except O. saldanhae and O. striaticauda, which have seven to nine post- rostral teeth. The new species can easily be separated from the South African O. saldanhae by the shape of the scaphocerite, which is lanceolate (see Barnard, 1950) and without a distinct distolateral tooth in O. saldanhae (vs. ovate and with a distinct tooth in O. sindibadi sp. nov.), as well as by the rostrum being acutely triangular and overreaching the inferior orbital angle in O. saldanhae (vs. obtuse and much shorter in O. sindibadi sp. nov.).

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access OGYRIDES SINDIBADI NOV. 233

Ogyrides sindibadi sp. nov. is morphologically very close to O. striaticauda, originally described from Chilka Lake, sharing with it the short, obtuse rostrum, hirsute carapace, robust ambulatory pereiopods, seven post-rostral teeth (7-9 in O. striaticauda) and the merus of the third pereiopod harbouring only one distolateral spine. However, O. striaticauda can be separated from the new species by the shape of the scaphocerite, with the lamella being somewhat distally expanded (vs. straight in O. sindibadi sp. nov.), the distolateral tooth falling short of the distal margin of the lamella (vs. reaching beyond in O. sindibadi sp. nov.), the telson distal margin being very produced and distally angular (vs. weakly protruding and convex in O. sindibadi sp. nov.) and the dactylus of the third pereiopod being one- third of the propodus length (vs. 1.3 times as long in O. sindibadi sp. nov.). It is perhaps worth noting that Grabe & Lees (1995) reported upon planktonic larvae in Kuwait identiﬁed as O. orientalis, these being especially abundant in the northern part of Kuwait Bay, where there are extensive mudﬂats. Although it is not impossible that two species of Ogyrides occur in Kuwait, it seems likely that these larval records refer to O. sindibadi sp. nov.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Kuwait Petroleum Company (KPC) and the Kuwait Institute for Scientiﬁc Research (KISR) are acknowledged for ﬁnancial support.

REFERENCES

AN, J., C. B. BOYKO &X.LI, 2015. A review of bopyrids (Crustacea: Isopoda: Bopyridae) parasitic on caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea) from China. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 399: 1-85. ANKER,A.&S.DE GRAVE, 2016. An updated and annotated checklist of marine and brackish caridean shrimps of Singapore (Crustacea, Decapoda). Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 34(Suppl.): 343-454. AYÓN-PARENTE,M.&J.SALGADO-BARRAGÁN, 2013. A new species of the caridean shrimp genus Ogyrides Stebbing, 1914 (Decapoda: Ogyrididae) from the eastern tropical Pacific. Zootaxa, 3683: 589-594. BALSS, H., 1916. Crustacea II: Decapoda Macrura und Anomura (au§er Fam. Paguridae). In: W. MICHAELSEN (ed.), Beiträge der Meeresfauna Westafrikas: 13-46. (L. Friederichsen & Co., Hamburg). BALSS, H., 1921. Results of Dr. E. Mjöbergs Swedish Scientific Expeditions to Australia 1910-13. XXIX. Stomatopoda, Macrura, Paguridea und Galatheidae. Bihang till Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 61: 1-24. BANNER,D.M.&A.H.BANNER, 1982. The alpheid shrimp of Australia, part III: the remaining alpheids, principally the genus Alpheus, and the family Ogyrididae. Records of the Australian Museum, 34: 1-357.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access 234 SAMMY DE GRAVE, MANAL AL-KANDARI & ARTHUR ANKER

BARNARD, K. H., 1947. Descriptions of new species of South African decapod Crustacea, with notes on synonymy and new records. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (11) 13: 361-392. [Imprint 1946.] BARNARD, K. H., 1950. Descriptive catalogue of South African decapod Crustacea (crabs and shrimps). Annals of the South African Museum, 38: 1-837. BRUCE, A. J., 1990. Redescriptions of five Hong Kong carideans first described by William Stimpson, 1860. In: B. MORTON (ed.), Proceedings of the second international marine biological workshop: the marine fauna and flora of Hong Kong and southern China, Hong Kong, 1986: 569-610. (Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong). BRUCE,A.J.&K.E.COOMBES, 1997. An annotated check-list of the caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) of Darwin Harbour, with descriptions of three new species of Periclimenes [Palaemonidae: Pontoniinae]. In: J. R. HANLEY,G.CASWELL,D.MEGIRIAN &H.K. LARSON (eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international marine biological workshop: the marine fauna and flora of Darwin Harbour, Northern Territory, Australia: 301-337. (Museums and Arts Galleries of the Northern Territory and the Australian Marine Sciences Association, Darwin). CARVACHO,A.&R.OLSON, 1984. Nuevos registros para la fauna carcinológica del noreste de México y descripción de una nueva especie: Eualus subtilis. The Southwestern Naturalist, 29(1): 59-71. DE GRAVE,S.&C.W.ASHELBY, 2011. Notes on some shrimp species (Decapoda: Caridea) from Qatar, with an annotated checklist of marine caridean species known from the Persian Gulf. Marine Biodiversity Records, 4: e20[1-7]. DE GRAVE,S.&C.H.J.M.FRANSEN, 2011. Carideorum catalogus: the recent species of the dendrobranchiate, stenopodidean, procarididean and caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zoologische Mededelingen, 85(9): 195-589. DE MAN, J. G., 1910. Diagnoses of new species of macrurous decapod Crustacea from the “Siboga- Expedition”. Tijdschrift der Nederlandsche Dierkundige Vereeniging, (2), 11: 287-319. DE MAN, J. G., 1911. The Decapoda of the Siboga Expedition. Part II. Family Alpheidae. Siboga Expeditie Mon., 39a1: 133-465. DE MAN, J. G., 1915. The Decapoda of the Siboga Expedition. Family Apheidae. Supplement to Part II. Siboga Expeditie Mon., 39a1: pls. 1-23. DE MAN, J. G., 1922. The Decapoda of the Siboga Expedition. Part V. On a collection of macrurous decapod Crustacea of the Siboga Expedition, chiefly Penaeidae and Alpheidae. Siboga Expeditie Mon., 39a4: 1-51. FUJINO,T.&S.MIYAKE, 1970. Caridean and stenopodidean shrimps from the east China and the Yellow seas (Crustacea, Decapoda, Natantia). Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 16: 237-312. GALIL,B.S.,C.FROGLIA &P.NOèL, 2015. Looking back, looking ahead: the CIESM atlas, crustaceans. Management of Biological Invasions, 6: 171-175. GRABE,S.A.&D.C.LEES, 1995. Macrozooplankton studies in Kuwait Bay (Arabian Gulf). III. Distribution and composition of larval pleocyemate decapod Crustacea. Journal of Plankton Research, 17: 955-963. HENDRICKX,M.E.&M.K.WICKSTEN, 1987. Studies of the coastal marine fauna of southern Sinaloa, Mexico. VIII. Additional report on the caridean crustaceans. Anales del Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 14(1): 13-20. HOLTHUIS, L. B., 1951. The caridean Crustacea of tropical West Africa. Atlantide Report, Scientific Results of the Danish Expedition to the Coasts of Tropical West Africa 1945-1946, 2: 7Ð187. HOLTHUIS, L. B., 1955. The recent genera of the caridean and stenopodidean shrimps (class Crus- tacea, order Decapoda, supersection Natantia) with keys for their determination. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 26: 1-157.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access OGYRIDES SINDIBADI NOV. 235

HOLTHUIS,L.B.&E.GOTTLIEB, 1958. An annotated list of the decapod Crustacea of the Mediter- ranean coast of Israel, with an appendix listing the Decapoda of the eastern Mediterranean. Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel, 7B: 1-126, pls. 1-3. KEMP, S., 1915. Fauna of the Chilka Lake. No. 3. Crustacea Decapoda. Memoirs of the Indian Museum, 5: 201-325. KIM, H. S., 1977. Macrura. Illustrated flora and fauna of Korea, 19: 1-414. (Ministry of Education & Samhwa Publishing, Seoul). KINGSLEY, J. S., 1880. On a collection of Crustacea from Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida, with a revision of the genera of Crangonidae and Palaemonidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1879: 383-427. [For 1879.] LEDOYER, M., 1969. Les Caridea de la frondaison des herbiers de phanérogames de la région de Tuléar (République Malgache). Étude systématique et Écologique. Recueil des Travaux de la Station Marine d’Endoume, 6: 299-349. LEDOYER, M., 1970. Étude systématique et remarques écologiques sur les Caridea recueillis principalement dans les biotopes de substrat meuble régions de Tuléar et de Nosy-Bé. Annales de l’Université de Madagascar, (Sciences de la Nature et Mathématiques), 7: 121-157. ORTMANN, A., 1893. Decapoden und Schizopoden. Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung, 2: 1-120, pls. 1-10. STEBBING, T. R. R., 1914. South African Crustacea. Part VII of S. A. Crustacea, for the marine investigations in South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum, 15: 1-55, pls. 1-12. STIMPSON, W., 1860. Prodromus descriptionis animalium evertebratorum, quae in Expeditione ad Oceanum Pacificam Septentrionalem, a Republica Foederata missa, Cadwaladore Ringgold et Johanne Rodgers ducibus, observavit et descripsit. Pars VIII, Crustacea Macrura. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1860: 22-47. TIRMIZI, N. M., 1980. Two caridean shrimps new to the northern Arabian Sea. Crustaceana, 39: 107-110. WICKSTEN, M. K., 1983. A monograph on the shallow water caridean shrimps of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Allan Hancock Monographs in Marine Biology, 13: 1-51. WICKSTEN,M.K.&M.MÉNDEZ, 1988. New records for Ogyrides alphaerostis and a new species, Ogyrides tarazonai (Crustacea: Ogyrididae), from the eastern Pacific Ocean. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 101(3): 622-625. WILLIAMS, A. B., 1981. Western Atlantic shrimps of the caridean shrimp genus Ogyrides. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 1(1): 143-147. YALDWYN, J. C., 1971. Preliminary descriptions of a new genus and twelve new species of natant decapod Crustacea from New Zealand. Records of the Dominion Museum, 7: 85-94. YOKOYA, Y., 1927. Notes on two alpheoid shrimps from Japan. Journal of the College of Agriculture, Tokyo Imperial University, 9: 171-176, pl. 7.

First received 12 February 2020. Final version accepted 20 February 2020.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:02:51PM via free access