DOCSLIB.ORG

A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H.!J.!M. Fransen9, Laura Y.!D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E.!Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K.!L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S.!H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected][email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected][email protected][email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P.!O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected][email protected][email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720 United States of America [email protected] 13Department of Geosciences, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, Edinboro, PA 16444 United States of America [email protected] ABSTRACT. – We present an updated classification for the entire Crustacea Decapoda, listing all known families and genera organized by higher taxonomic groups and including estimates of the number of species in every genus. All taxonomic names are also linked to the verified literature in which they were described, the first compilation of its kind for the Decapoda. To arrive at this compilation, we began with the classification scheme provided by Martin & Davis (2001) for extant families, updated the higher classification and included the fossil taxa. The resultant framework was then populated with the currently valid genera and an estimate of species numbers within each genus. Our resulting classification, spanning both extant (living) and fossil taxa, is the first comprehensive estimate of taxonomic diversity within the entire Decapoda. The classification consists of 233 families of decapods containing 2,725 genera and an estimated 17,635 species (including both extant and fossil species). Of the families in our classification, 53 are exclusively fossil, 109 contain both fossil and extant species, and 71 are extant only. The current estimate for extant species is 14,756, whereas 2,979 species are known exclusively as fossils. KEY WORDS. – Decapoda, Crustacea, Arthropoda, taxonomy, classification. 1 De Grave et al.: Living and fossil genera of decapod crustaceans CONTENTS Preamble !........................................................................... 3 !!Infraorder Brachyura !.................................................. 26 General notes !.................................................................... 3 !!!Section Dromiacea !................................................... 26 How many species of Decapoda are there? !...................... 5 !!!!! Superfamily Dakoticancroidea !............................ 26 The higher classification of Decapoda !.............................. 5 !!!!! Superfamily Dromioidea !..................................... 26 The placement of fossil taxa !............................................. 8 !!!!! Superfamily Eocarcinoidea !.................................. 27 Acknowledgements!............................................................ 9 !!!!! Superfamily Glaessneropsoidea !.......................... 27 Literature cited !................................................................ 10 !!!!! Superfamily Homolodromioidea !......................... 27 Order Decapoda !.............................................................. 14 !!!!! Superfamily Homoloidea !.................................... 28 ! Suborder Dendrobranchiata !.......................................... 14 !!!Section Raninoida !.................................................... 28 !!!!! Superfamily Penaeoidea !...................................... 14 !!!Section Cyclodorippoida !.......................................... 29 !!!!! Superfamily Sergestoidea !.................................... 14 !!!Section Eubrachyura !................................................ 29 ! Suborder Pleocyemata !.................................................. 15 !!!!Subsection Heterotremata !...................................... 29 !!Infraorder Stenopodidea !............................................. 15 !!!!! Superfamily Aethroidea !....................................... 29 !!Infraorder Caridea !...................................................... 15 !!!!! Superfamily Bellioidea !........................................ 29 !!!!! Superfamily Pleopteryxoidea !.............................. 15 !!!!! Superfamily Bythograeoidea !............................... 30 !!!!! Superfamily Procaridoidea !.................................. 15 !!!!! Superfamily Calappoidea !.................................... 30 !!!!! Superfamily Galatheacaridoidea !.......................... 15 !!!!! Superfamily Cancroidea !...................................... 30 !!!!! Superfamily Pasiphaeoidea !.................................. 15 !!!!! Superfamily Carpilioidea !.................................... 30 !!!!! Superfamily Oplophoroidea !................................ 15 !!!!! Superfamily Cheiragonoidea !............................... 31 !!!!! Superfamily Atyoidea !.......................................... 15 !!!!! Superfamily Componocancroidea !....................... 31 !!!!! Superfamily Bresilioidea !..................................... 16 !!!!! Superfamily Corystoidea !..................................... 31 !!!!! Superfamily Nematocarcinoidea !......................... 16 !!!!! Superfamily Dairoidea !........................................ 31 !!!!! Superfamily Psalidopodoidea !.............................. 16 !!!!! Superfamily Dorippoidea !.................................... 31 !!!!! Superfamily Stylodactyloidea !.............................. 16 !!!!! Superfamily Eriphioidea !...................................... 31 !!!!! Superfamily Campylonotoidea !............................ 16 !!!!! Superfamily Gecarcinucoidea !.............................. 32 !!!!! Superfamily Palaemonoidea !................................ 16 !!!!! Superfamily Goneplacoidea !................................ 32 !!!!! Superfamily Alpheoidea !...................................... 18 !!!!! Superfamily Hexapodoidea !................................. 33 !!!!! Superfamily Processoidea !.................................... 19 !!!!! Superfamily Leucosioidea !................................... 33 !!!!! Superfamily Pandaloidea !..................................... 19 !!!!! Superfamily Majoidea !......................................... 34 !!!!! Superfamily Physetocaridoidea !........................... 19 !!!!! Superfamily Orithyioidea !.................................... 37 !!!!! Superfamily Crangonoidea !.................................. 19 !!!!! Superfamily Palicoidea !........................................ 37 !!!!! Unplaced at superfamily level !............................. 19 !!!!! Superfamily Parthenopoidea !................................ 37 !!Infraorder Astacidea !................................................... 20 !!!!! Superfamily Pilumnoidea !.................................... 37 !!!!! Superfamily Palaeopalaemonoidea !...................... 20 !!!!! Superfamily Portunoidea !..................................... 38 !!!!! Superfamily Enoplometopoidea !.......................... 20 !!!!! Superfamily Potamoidea !...................................... 39 !!!!! Superfamily Nephropoidea !.................................. 20 !!!!! Superfamily Pseudothelphusoidea !...................... 40 !!!!! Superfamily Astacoidea !....................................... 20 !!!!! Superfamily Pseudozioidea !................................. 41 !!!!! Superfamily Parastacoidea !.................................. 20 !!!!! Superfamily Retroplumoidea !.............................. 41 !!Infraorder Glypheidea !................................................ 20 !!!!! Superfamily Trapezioidea !.................................... 41 !!!!! Superfamily Erymoidea !....................................... 20 !!!!! Superfamily Trichodactyloidea !........................... 41 !!!!! Superfamily Glypheoidea !.................................... 21 !!!!! Superfamily Xanthoidea !...................................... 42 !!Infraorder
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOPAPUA Expedition Highlighting Deep-Sea Benthic Biodiversity of Papua New- Guinea
    Biopapua Expedition – Progress report MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE 57 rue Cuvier 75005 PARIS‐ France BIOPAPUA Expedition Highlighting deep-sea benthic Biodiversity of Papua New- Guinea Submitted by: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN) Represented by (co‐PI): Dr Sarah Samadi (Researcher, IRD) Dr Philippe Bouchet (Professor, MNHN) Dr Laure Corbari (Research associate, MNHN) 1 Biopapua Expedition – Progress report Contents Foreword 3 1‐ Our understanding of deep‐sea biodiversity of PNG 4 2 ‐ Tropical Deep‐Sea Benthos program 5 3‐ Biopapua Expedition 7 4‐ Collection management 15 5‐ Preliminary results 17 6‐ Outreach and publications 23 7‐ Appendices 26 Appendix 1 27 NRI, note n°. 302/2010 on 26th march, 2010, acceptance of Biopapua reseach programme Appendix 2 28 Biopapua cruise Report, submitted by Ralph MANA (UPNG) A Report Submitted to School of Natural and Physical Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea Appendix 3 39 Chan, T.Y (2012) A new genus of deep‐sea solenocerid shrimp (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeoidea) from the Papua New Guinea. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 32(3), 489‐495. Appendix 4 47 Pante E, Corbari L., Thubaut J., Chan TY, Mana R., Boisselier MC, Bouchet P., Samadi S. (In Press). Exploration of the deep‐sea fauna of Papua New Guinea. Oceanography Appendix 5 60 Richer de Forges B. & Corbari L. (2012) A new species of Oxypleurodon Miers, 1886 (Crustacea Brachyura, Majoidea) from the Bismark Sea, Papua New Guinea. Zootaxa. 3320: 56–60 Appendix 6 66 Taxonomic list: Specimens in MNHN and Taiwan collections 2 Biopapua Expedition – Progress report Foreword Biopapua cruise was a MNHN/IRD deep‐sea cruise in partnership with the School of Natural and Physical Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmed Shrimp Production Data & Analysis
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Shrimp Production Review • Professor James L. Anderson, Director, Institute for Sustainable Food Systems - University of Florida • Dr. Diego Valderrama, University of los Andes, Colombia • Dr. Darryl Jory, Editor Emeritus, Global Aquaculture Alliance 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Other Middle East / N Africa Shrimp Aquaculture Production by World Region: 2000-2015 (FAO Data) India 2006 - 2012 CAGR: 4.8% Americas China 5000K +4.2% Southeast Asia +8.8% 4500K Source: FAO (2017). +3.2% Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, 4000K Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar and 3500K Taiwan. M. rosenbergii is not included. 3000K MT 2500K 2000K 1500K 1000K 500K 0K 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Other Middle East / N Africa Shrimp Aquaculture Production by World Region: 2000-2019 India Americas (FAO and GOAL Data) China 2016-2019 Projected CAGR: Southeast Asia 2006-2012 CAGR: 3.6% 4.8% Sources: FAO (2017) for 5000K 2000-2009; GOAL (2011-2016) for 2010-2015; GOAL (2017) 4500K for 2016-2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachyura, Majoidea) Genera Acanthonyx Latreille, 1828 and Epialtus H
    Nauplius 20(2): 179-186, 2012 179 Range extensions along western Atlantic for Epialtidae crabs (Brachyura, Majoidea) genera Acanthonyx Latreille, 1828 and Epialtus H. Milne Edwards, 1834 Ana Francisca Tamburus and Fernando L. Mantelatto Laboratory of Bioecology and Crustacean Systematics (LBSC) - Postgraduate Program in Comparative Biology - Department of Biology - Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP) - University of São Paulo (USP). Av. Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14040- 901, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil. E-mails: (AFT) [email protected]; (FLM) [email protected] Abstract The present study provided information extending the known geographical distribution of three species of majoid crabs, the epialtids Acanthonyx dissimulatus Coelho, 1993, Epialtus bituberculatus H. Milne Edwards, 1834, and E. brasiliensis Dana, 1852. Specimens of both genera from different carcinological collections were studied by comparing morphological characters. We provide new data that extends the geographical distributions of E. bituberculatus to the coast of the states of Paraná and Santa Catarina (Brazil), and offer new records from Belize and Costa Rica. Epialtus brasiliensis is recorded for the first time in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil), and A. dissimulatus is reported from Quintana Roo, Mexico. The distribution of A. dissimulatus, previously known as endemic to Brazil, has a gap between the states of Espírito Santo and Rio de Janeiro. However, this restricted southern distribution is herein amplified by the Mexican specimens. Key words: Geographic distribution, majoid, new records, spider crabs. Introduction (Melo, 1996). Epialtus bituberculatus H. Milne Edwards, 1834 has been from Florida (USA), The family Epialtidae MacLeay, 1838 Gulf of Mexico, West Indies, Colombia, includes 76 genera, among them Acanthonyx Venezuela and Brazil (Ceará to São Paulo Latreille, 1828 and Epialtus H.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Phlyctenodes Milne Edwards, 1862 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Xanthidae) in the Eocene of Europe
    350 RevistaBusulini Mexicana et al. de Ciencias Geológicas, v. 23, núm. 3, 2006, p. 350-360 The genus Phlyctenodes Milne Edwards, 1862 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Xanthidae) in the Eocene of Europe Alessandra Busulini1,*, Giuliano Tessier2, and Claudio Beschin3 1 c/o Museo di Storia Naturale, S. Croce 1730, I - 30125, Venezia, Italia. 2 via Barbarigo 10, I – 30126, Lido di Venezia, Italia. 3 Associazione Amici del Museo Zannato, Piazza Marconi 15, I - 36075, Montecchio Maggiore (Vicenza), Italia. * [email protected] ABSTRACT A systematic review of the crab genus Phlyctenodes Milne Edwards, 1862 is carried out. Based on carapace features, this taxon is placed in the subfamily Actaeinae, family Xanthidae MacLeay, 1838. Species attributed to this genus are known from Eocene reef environments in Europe. Preservation of crustacean remains in this kind of environment is very rare, and it could explain scarcity of specimens of this genus. For the fi rst time, pictures of types of this genus described during the XIX century and the fi rst decades of the XX century are presented. A study of recently collected specimens from the Eocene of Veneto (Italy) allows to clarify relationships between Phlyctenodes krenneri Lörenthey, 1898 and P. dalpiazi Fabiani, 1911. Presence of P. tuberculosus Milne Edwards, 1862 among the new material is documented. The other known species of this genus, P. hantkeni Lörenthey, 1898 is placed in Pseudophlyctenodes new genus on the basis of differences in morphological features. Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Phlyctenodes, systematic review, Eocene, Italy. RESUMEN Se presenta una revisión sistemática del género de cangrejo Phlyctenodes Milne Edwards, 1862. Con base en las características del caparazón, este taxon es ubicado en la subfamilia Actaeinae, familia Xanthidae MacLeay, 1838.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Feed on the Growth and Survival of Long Eyed Swimming
    Soundarapandian et al., 2:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/scientificreports681 Open Access Open Access Scientific Reports Scientific Reports Research Article OpenOpen Access Access Effect of Feed on the Growth and Survival of Long Eyed Swimming Crab Podophthalmus vigil Fabricius (Crustacea: Decapoda) Soundarapandian P1*, Ravichandran S2 and Varadharajan D1 1Faculty of Marine Sciences, Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India 2Department of Zoology, Government Arts College, Kumbakonam, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract Food is considered to be the most potent factor affecting growth. Attempts to develop diets for culture of crabs have resulted in a variety of feeds. The absence of suitable feed either pellet or live food which can promote growth and survival is considered to be the most important lacuna in cultivation of crabs. So searching of economically viable feed to optimize the growth and survival in crabs are very much essential. In the present study the weight gain was higher in the crabs offered with Acetes sp. (86 g) followed by clam meat fed animals (47 g). The crabs fed with minimum amount of Acetes sp. (152 g) and maximum of clam meat (182 g). The FCR value was better in Acetes sp. (1.8) fed animal rather than clam meat fed animals (3.8). The survival rate was higher in Acetes sp. fed animals (92%) and lowest survival (72%) was observed in animals fed with clam meat. The survival was reasonable for both the feeds. But higher survival rate was reported in the animals fed with Acetes sp. than that of clam meat.
    [Show full text]
  • First Mediterranean Record of Actaea Savignii (H. Milne Edwards, 1834) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Xanthidae), an Additional Erythraean Alien Crab
    BioInvasions Records (2013) Volume 2, Issue 2: 145–148 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2013.2.2.09 © 2013 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2013 REABIC Rapid Communication First Mediterranean record of Actaea savignii (H. Milne Edwards, 1834) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Xanthidae), an additional Erythraean alien crab Selahattin Ünsal Karhan1*, Mehmet Baki Yokeş2, Paul F. Clark3 and Bella S. Galil4 1 Division of Hydrobiology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, 34134 Vezneciler, Istanbul, Turkey 2 Department of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Faculty of Arts & Sciences, Haliç University, 34381 Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey 3 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England 4 National Institute of Oceanography, Israel Oceanographic & Limnological Research, POB 8030, Haifa 31080, Israel E-mail: [email protected] (SÜK), [email protected] (MBY), [email protected] (PFC), [email protected] (BSG) *Corresponding author Received: 19 January 2013 / Accepted: 8 March 2013 / Published online: 16 March 2013 Handling editor: Amy Fowler Abstract To date, the only alien xanthid crab recorded from the Mediterranean is Atergatis roseus (Rüppell, 1830). This species was first collected off Israel in 1961 and is now common along the Levantine coast. Recently a second alien xanthid species, Actaea savignii (H. Milne Edwards, 1834), was found off Israel and Turkey. A single adult specimen was collected in Haifa Bay in 2010, and two specimens were captured off Mersin, Turkey in 2011. Repeatedly reported from the Suez Canal since 1924, the record of the Levantine populations of A. savignii is a testament to the ongoing Erythraean invasion of the Mediterranean Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Brachyuran Crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Eastern Tropical Pacific by Michel E
    BULLETIN DE L'INSTITUT ROYAL DES SCIENCES NATURELLES DE BELGIQUE, BIOLOGIE, 65: 125-150, 1995 BULLETIN VAN HET KONINKLIJK BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN, BIOLOGIE, 65: 125-150, 1995 Checklist of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the eastern tropical Pacific by Michel E. HENDRICKX Abstract Introduction Literature dealing with brachyuran crabs from the east Pacific When available, reliable checklists of marine species is reviewed. Marine and brackish water species reported at least occurring in distinct geographic regions of the world are once in the Eastern Tropical Pacific zoogeographic subregion, of multiple use. In addition of providing comparative which extends from Magdalena Bay, on the west coast of Baja figures for biodiversity studies, they serve as an impor- California, Mexico, to Paita, in northern Peru, are listed and tant tool in defining extension of protected area, inferr- their distribution range along the Pacific coast of America is provided. Unpublished records, based on material kept in the ing potential impact of anthropogenic activity and author's collections were also considered to determine or con- complexity of communities, and estimating availability of firm the presence of species, or to modify previously published living resources. Checklists for zoogeographic regions or distribution ranges within the study area. A total of 450 species, provinces also facilitate biodiversity studies in specific belonging to 181 genera, are included in the checklist, the first habitats, which serve as points of departure for (among ever made available for the entire tropical zoogeographic others) studying the structure of food chains, the relative subregion of the west coast of America. A list of names of species abundance of species, and number of species or total and subspecies currently recognized as invalid for the area is number of organisms of various physical sizes (MAY, also included.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustaceans Topics in Biodiversity
    Topics in Biodiversity The Encyclopedia of Life is an unprecedented effort to gather scientific knowledge about all life on earth- multimedia, information, facts, and more. Learn more at eol.org. Crustaceans Authors: Simone Nunes Brandão, Zoologisches Museum Hamburg Jen Hammock, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Frank Ferrari, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Photo credit: Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus) by Jeremy Thorpe, Flickr: EOL Images. CC BY-NC-SA Defining the crustacean The Latin root, crustaceus, "having a crust or shell," really doesn’t entirely narrow it down to crustaceans. They belong to the phylum Arthropoda, as do insects, arachnids, and many other groups; all arthropods have hard exoskeletons or shells, segmented bodies, and jointed limbs. Crustaceans are usually distinguishable from the other arthropods in several important ways, chiefly: Biramous appendages. Most crustaceans have appendages or limbs that are split into two, usually segmented, branches. Both branches originate on the same proximal segment. Larvae. Early in development, most crustaceans go through a series of larval stages, the first being the nauplius larva, in which only a few limbs are present, near the front on the body; crustaceans add their more posterior limbs as they grow and develop further. The nauplius larva is unique to Crustacea. Eyes. The early larval stages of crustaceans have a single, simple, median eye composed of three similar, closely opposed parts. This larval eye, or “naupliar eye,” often disappears later in development, but on some crustaceans (e.g., the branchiopod Triops) it is retained even after the adult compound eyes have developed. In all copepod crustaceans, this larval eye is retained throughout their development as the 1 only eye, although the three similar parts may separate and each become associated with their own cuticular lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarkable Convergent Evolution in Specialized Parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea)
    Remarkable convergent evolution in specialized parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea) Pérez-Losada, Marcos; Høeg, Jens Thorvald; Crandall, Keith A Published in: BMC Biology DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-15 Publication date: 2009 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Pérez-Losada, M., Høeg, J. T., & Crandall, K. A. (2009). Remarkable convergent evolution in specialized parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea). BMC Biology, 7(15), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-15 Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 BMC Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Remarkable convergent evolution in specialized parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea) Marcos Pérez-Losada*1, JensTHøeg2 and Keith A Crandall3 Address: 1CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Portugal, 2Comparative Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark and 3Department of Biology and Monte L Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA Email: Marcos Pérez-Losada* - [email protected]; Jens T Høeg - [email protected]; Keith A Crandall - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 17 April 2009 Received: 10 December 2008 Accepted: 17 April 2009 BMC Biology 2009, 7:15 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-7-15 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/7/15 © 2009 Pérez-Losada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]