DOCSLIB.ORG

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments in The CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS IN THE APPALACHIAN LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION COOPERATIVE REGION: PHASE II RESULTS OF ASSESSMENTS LESLEY SNEDDON HECTOR GALBRAITH DECEMBER 2015 NatureServe is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing scientific knowledge that forms the basis for effective conservation. 1 Citation: Sneddon, L. and H. Galbraith. 2015. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments in the Appalachian LCC Region. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. © NatureServe 2015 This work was made possible with funding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative. The viewpoints in this publication are those of NatureServe and may not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Front cover photo: High Allegheny Wetland Ecological System, Monongahela National Forest, 2004 (Elizabeth Byers©) NatureServe 4600 North Fairfax Drive, 7th floor Arlington, VA 22203 www.natureserve.org 2 3 CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS IN THE APPALACHIAN LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION COOPERATIVE REGION Lesley Sneddon Hector Galbraith November 2015 4 Acknowledgments Funding for this project was provided by the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative. We would like to extend our thanks to Jean Brennan and Bridgett Costanzo of the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative for their guidance. We would also like to thank the members of the Expert Panel for developing criteria for the selection of species and habitats: Kyle Barrett, Clemson University; John O’Leary, Massachusetts Department of Fish and Wildlife; Hector Galbraith, National Wildlife Federation; Patricia Butler, Michigan Technological University, Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science; Robert Cooper, University of Georgia; Kim Hall, The Nature Conservancy, Great Lakes; Healy Hamilton, Marine Conservation Institute (currently of NatureServe), and to the members of the ad-hoc committee to select the species and habitats to be assessed: Jon Ambrose, Georgia Department of Natural Resources; Kyle Barrett, Clemson University; Patricia Butler, Michigan Technological University; and Al Schotz, Alabama Natural Heritage Program. We also thank Mary Harkness and Gwen Kittell of NatureServe for their contributions to the GIS analyses, and to Milo Pyne of Nature Serve, and Bill Wolfe and Jen Cartwright of USGS for their thoughtful review and comment on the habitat sections of an earlier draft of this report. We also extend our sincere thanks to Jeff Corser of the New York Natural Heritage Program for completing significant portions of the CCVI factors. 5 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. 8 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... 9 List of Appendices .................................................................................................................... 10 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 14 Climate change in the Appalachian LCC area ..................................................................... 15 Methods ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Addressing the Expert Panel recommendations ................................................................ 16 Compilation and analysis of existing data .......................................................................... 18 Species Assessments .......................................................................................................... 18 Analysis of Existing Habitat Assessments ....................................................................... 26 Criteria for selection of additional species to be assessed ................................................. 30 Criteria for selection of additional habitats to be assessed ............................................... 34 Vulnerability assessment methods – Species ...................................................................... 36 Climate Exposure .............................................................................................................. 38 Sensitivity ........................................................................................................................... 39 Vulnerability assessment methods – habitats .................................................................... 41 Vulnerability model - structure and variables ................................................................ 42 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 45 Analysis of new data - species .............................................................................................. 45 Analysis of new data – habitats ............................................................................................ 58 South Central Interior Small Stream and Riparian (CES202.706) ................................. 58 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 62 Southern Interior Low Plateau Dry-Mesic Oak Forest (CES202.898) ........................... 62 6 Distribution: ...................................................................................................................... 62 Ecology: .............................................................................................................................. 62 Important community determinants: .............................................................................. 63 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 67 Central Interior Highlands Calcareous Glade and Barrens (CES202.691) ..................... 67 Distribution: ...................................................................................................................... 67 Ecology: .............................................................................................................................. 67 Important community determinants: .............................................................................. 68 Model Scores ...................................................................................................................... 68 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 70 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 70 Sources of uncertainty .......................................................................................................... 70 Other factors to consider ...................................................................................................... 71 Limitations of the assessment methods ........................................................................... 71 The role of dispersal .......................................................................................................... 72 Climate exposure index ..................................................................................................... 73 Adaptation and adaptive capacity .................................................................................... 74 Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................................................... 74 References ................................................................................................................................. 77 7 List of Figures Figure 1 Subregions defined for analysis, modified from Keys et al. (1995) ........................ 18 Figure 2 Southern Appalachian and Interior Low Plateau study areas in two regional studies: Carroll et al. (2011) (left) and Bruno et al. 201 (right). .............................................. 20 Figure 3 Major watersheds and natural divisions of Illinois (from Walk et al. 2011) ............ 21 Figure 4. Mid-century (2040-2069) projected increase in temperature in degrees Fahrenheit. ................................................................................................................................ 40 Figure 5 Projected mid-century (2040-2069) Hamon moisture metric (Hamon 1961) ....... 40 Figure 6 Range of Southern Interior Low Plateau Dry Mesic Oak Forest ........................... 43 Figure 7 Similar Dry-Mesic forest habitats adjacent to the Southern Interior Low Plateau Dry-Mesic Oak Forest. ............................................................................................................. 64 Figure 8 Landscape condition in and around the Appalachian LCC. Pink indicates poor condition (Comer and Hak 2009) ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • This File Was Created by Scanning the Printed
    J Insect Behav DOl 10.1007/sI0905-011-9289-1 Evidence for Mate Guarding Behavior in the Taylor's Checkerspot Butterfly Victoria J. Bennett· Winston P. Smith· Matthew G. Betts Revised: 29 July 20 II/Accepted: 9 August 20II ��. Springer Seicnee+Business Media, LLC 2011 Abstract Discerning the intricacies of mating systems in butterflies can be difficult, particularly when multiple mating strategies are employed and are cryptic and not exclusive. We observed the behavior and habitat use of 113 male Taylor's checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas editha taylori). We confinned that two distinct mating strategies were exhibited; patrolling and perching. These strategies varied temporally in relation to the protandrous mating system employed. Among perching males, we recorded high site fidelity and aggressive defense of small «5 m2) territories. This telTitoriality was not clearly a function of classic or non-classic resource defense (i.e., host plants or landscape), but rather appeared to constitute guarding of female pupae (virgin females). This discrete behavior is previously undocumented for this species and has rarely been observed in butterflies. Keywords Euphydryas editha taylori . mating systems · pre-copulatory mate guarding· protandry· sexual selection Introduction Inn'asexual selection is the most conunonly observed and well-documented sexual selection process exhibited by butterfly species (Andersson 1994; Rutowski 1997; Wiklund 2003). Competition between males for sexually receptive females has led to the evolution of a large variety of mating systems in this taxon (Rutowski 1991). Among these mating systems, mate acquisition strategies, such as mate locating, V J. Bennett (18) . M. G. Betts Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Seed Size, Testa Color, Scarification Method, and Immersion in Cool Or Hot Water on Germination of Baptisia Austral
    HORTSCIENCE 40(6):1846–1849. 2005. Seeds were cleaned and separated into two size fractions using U.S. standard test sieves. For the large-seeded fraction, 100% of the Infl uence of Seed Size, Testa Color, seeds passed through a No. 6 sieve (3.35 mm nominal opening) and 100% were retained on Scarifi cation Method, and Immersion a No. 8 sieve (2.36 mm nomimal opening). For the small-seeded fraction, 100% of the in Cool or Hot Water on Germination seeds passed through a No. 8 sieve and 100% were retained on a No. 10 sieve (2.00 mm nominal opening). Seeds were stored at 20ºC of Baptisia australis (L.) R. Br. Seeds and 30% relative humidity until experiments Thomas H. Boyle1 commenced. Germination experiments were Department of Plant, Soil and Insect Sciences, French Hall, University of performed between mid-October 2004 and January 2005. Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 Germination methods. Seeds were sown Kristen Hladun2 in 15-cm glass petri dishes on top of a single layer of blue blotter paper (Anchor Plant Biology Graduate Program, Morrill Science Center, University of Paper Co., St. Paul, Minn.). To inhibit Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 fungal growth, seeds were treated one day after sowing with 3α,4,7,7α-tetrahydro- Additional index words. germination, native wildfl ower, propagation, sulfuric acid 2-[(trichloromethyl)thio]-1H-isoindole- Abstract. A series of experiments was performed to examine the germination responses 1,3(2H)-dione (Captan) at 0.24 mg/100 mL of Baptisia australis (L.) R. Br. seeds. Germination tests were conducted at 23 °C and solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of the North-Central States: C
    LEGUMES OF THE NORTH-CENTRAL STATES: C-ALEGEAE by Stanley Larson Welsh A Dissertation Submitted, to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Systematic Botany Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. artment Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean of Graduat College Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa I960 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORICAL ACCOUNT 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURE TREATMENT 13 REFERENCES 158 APPENDIX A 176 APPENDIX B 202 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his deep gratitude to Professor Duane Isely for assistance in the selection of the problem and for the con­ structive criticisms and words of encouragement offered throughout the course of this investigation. Support through the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station and through the Industrial Science Research Institute made possible the field work required in this problem. Thanks are due to the curators of the many herbaria consulted during this investigation. Special thanks are due the curators of the Missouri Botanical Garden, U. S. National Museum, University of Minnesota, North Dakota Agricultural College, University of South Dakota, University of Nebraska, and University of Michigan. The cooperation of the librarians at Iowa State University is deeply appreciated. Special thanks are due Dr. G. B. Van Schaack of the Missouri Botanical Garden library. His enthusiastic assistance in finding rare botanical volumes has proved invaluable in the preparation of this paper. To the writer's wife, Stella, deepest appreciation is expressed. Her untiring devotion, work, and cooperation have made this work possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Stones River National Battlefield
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Stones River National Battlefield Natural Resource Report NPS/STRI/NRR—2016/1141 ON THIS PAGE Native warm season grass, located south of Stones River National Battlefield visitor center Photograph by: Jeremy Aber, MTSU Geospatial Research Center ON THE COVER Karst topography in the cedar forest at the “Slaughter Pen,” Stones River National Battlefield Photograph by: Jeremy Aber, MTSU Geospatial Research Center Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Stones River National Battlefield Natural Resource Report NPS/STRI/NRR—2016/1141 Henrique Momm Zada Law Siti Nur Hidayati Jeffrey Walck Kim Sadler Mark Abolins Lydia Simpson Jeremy Aber Geospatial Research Center Department of Geosciences Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132 February 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Open As a Single Document
    Cercis: The Redbuds by KENNETH R. ROBERTSON One of the few woody plants native to eastern North America that is widely planted as an ornamental is the eastern redbud, Cercis canadensis. This plant belongs to a genus of about eight species that is of interest to plant geographers because of its occurrence in four widely separated areas - the eastern United States southwestward to Mexico; western North America; south- ern and eastern Europe and western Asia; and eastern Asia. Cercis is a very distinctive genus in the Caesalpinia subfamily of the legume family (Leguminosae subfamily Caesalpinioi- - deae). Because the apparently simple heart-shaped leaves are actually derived from the fusion of two leaflets of an evenly pinnately compound leaf, Cercis is thought to be related to -~auhinic~, which includes the so-called orchid-trees c$~~ cultivated in tropical regions. The leaves of Bauhinia are usu- ally two-lobed with an apical notch and are made up of clearly ~ two partly fused leaflets. The eastern redbud is more important in the garden than most other spring flowering trees because the flower buds, as well as the open flowers, are colorful, and the total ornamental season continues for two to three weeks. In winter a small bud is found just above each of the leaf scars that occur along the twigs of the previous year’s growth; there are also clusters of winter buds on older branches and on the tree trunks (Figure 3). In early spring these winter buds enlarge (with the excep- tion of those at the tips of the branches) and soon open to re- veal clusters of flower buds.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • State Natural Area Management Plan
    OLD FOREST STATE NATURAL AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION NATURAL AREAS PROGRAM APRIL 2015 Prepared by: Allan J. Trently West Tennessee Stewardship Ecologist Natural Areas Program Division of Natural Areas Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 2nd Floor Nashville, TN 37243 TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 A. Guiding Principles .................................................................................................. 1 B. Significance............................................................................................................. 1 C. Management Authority ........................................................................................... 2 II DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................... 3 A. Statutes, Rules, and Regulations ............................................................................. 3 B. Project History Summary ........................................................................................ 3 C. Natural Resource Assessment ................................................................................. 3 1. Description of the Area ....................................................................... 3 2. Description of Threats .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Native Plant Society 2019 Plant List Herbaceous Plants
    Illinois Native Plant Society 2019 Plant List Plant Sale: Saturday, May 11, 9:00am – 1:00pm Illinois State Fairgrounds Commodity Pavilion (Across from Grandstand) Herbaceous Plants Scientific Name Common Name Description Growing Conditions Comment Dry to moist, Sun to part Blooms mid-late summer Butterfly, bee. Agastache foeniculum Anise Hyssop 2-4', Lavender to purple flowers shade AKA Blue Giant Hyssop Allium cernuum var. Moist to dry, Sun to part Nodding Onion 12-18", Showy white flowers Blooms mid summer Bee. Mammals avoid cernuum shade 18", White flowers after leaves die Allium tricoccum Ramp (Wild Leek) Moist, Shade Blooms summer Bee. Edible back Moist to dry, Part shade to Blooms late spring-early summer Aquilegia canadensis Red Columbine 30", Scarlet and yellow flowers shade Hummingbird, bee Moist to wet, Part to full Blooms late spring-early summer Showy red Arisaema dracontium Green Dragon 1-3', Narrow greenish spadix shade fruits. Mammals avoid 1-2', Green-purple spadix, striped Moist to wet, Part to full Blooms mid-late spring Showy red fruits. Arisaema triphyllum Jack-in-the-Pulpit inside shade Mammals avoid Wet to moist, Part shade to Blooms late spring-early summer Bee. AKA Aruncus dioicus Goatsbeard 2-4', White fluffy panicles in spring shade Brides Feathers Wet to moist, Light to full Blooms mid-late spring Mammals avoid. Asarum canadense Canadian Wildginger 6-12", Purplish brown flowers shade Attractive groundcover 3-5', White flowers with Moist, Dappled sun to part Blooms summer Monarch larval food. Bee, Asclepias exaltata Poke Milkweed purple/green tint shade butterfly. Uncommon Blooms mid-late summer Monarch larval Asclepias hirtella (Tall) Green Milkweed To 3', Showy white flowers Dry to moist, Sun food.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rearing Method for Argynnis (Speyeria) Diana
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2011, Article ID 940280, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2011/940280 Research Article ARearingMethodforArgynnis (Speyeria) diana (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) That Avoids Larval Diapause Carrie N. Wells, Lindsey Edwards, Russell Hawkins, Lindsey Smith, and David Tonkyn Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, 132 Long Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Carrie N. Wells, [email protected] Received 25 May 2011; Accepted 4 August 2011 Academic Editor: Russell Jurenka Copyright © 2011 Carrie N. Wells et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We describe a rearing protocol that allowed us to raise the threatened butterfly, Argynnis diana (Nymphalidae), while bypassing the first instar overwintering diapause. We compared the survival of offspring reared under this protocol from field-collected A. diana females from North Carolina, Georgia, and Tennessee. Larvae were reared in the lab on three phylogenetically distinct species of Southern Appalachian violets (Viola sororia, V. pubescens,andV. pedata). We assessed larval survival in A. diana to the last instar, pupation, and adulthood. Males reared in captivity emerged significantly earlier than females. An ANOVA revealed no evidence of host plant preference by A. diana toward three native violet species. We suggest that restoration of A. diana habitat which promotes a wide array of larval and adult host plants, is urgently needed to conserve this imperiled species into the future. 1. Introduction larvae in cold storage blocks and storing them under con- trolled refrigerated conditions for the duration of their The Diana fritillary, Argynnis (Speyeria) diana (Cramer overwintering period [10].
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Domain Management Plan
    Domain Management Plan 2019-2029 FINAL DRAFT 12/20/2019 Owner Contact: Amy Turner, Ph.D., CWB Director of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability The University of the South Sewanee, Tennessee Office: 931-598-1447 Office: Cleveland Annex 110C Email: [email protected] Reviewed by: The Nature Conservancy Forest Stewards Guild ____________________________________________________________________________ Tract Location: Franklin and Marion Counties, Tennessee Centroid Latitude 35.982963 Longitude -85.344382 Tract Size: 13,036 acres | 5,275 hectares Land Manager: Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability, The University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee 2 Executive Summary The primary objective of this management plan is to provide a framework to outline future management and outline operations for the Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability (OESS) over the next ten years. In this plan, we will briefly introduce the physical and biological setting, past land use, and current uses of the Domain. The remainder of the plan consists of an assessment of the forest, which has been divided into six conservation areas. These conservation areas contain multiple management compartments, and the six areas have similarities in topographical position and past land use. Finally, the desired future condition and project summary of each conservation area and compartment has been outlined. Background The University of the South consists of an academic campus (382 acres) with adjacent commercial and residential areas (783 acres) that are embedded within and surrounded by diverse natural lands (11,838 acres). The term “Domain” is used interchangeably to describe both the entire ~13,000 acres and the 11,800-acre natural land matrix (also referred to as the “Greater Domain”).
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Wildfire Response of Shasta Snow-Wreath
    California Fish and Wildlife, Fire Special Issue; 92-98; 2020 RESEARCH NOTE Post-wildfire response of Shasta snow-wreath LEN LINDSTRAND III1*, JULIE A. KIERSTEAD2, AND DEAN W. TAYLOR3 † 1Sierra Pacific Industries,P .O. Box 496014, Redding, CA 96049-6014, USA 2P. O. Box 491536, Redding CA, 96049, USA 33212 Redwood Drive, Aptos, CA, 95003, USA † Deceased *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Key words: Hirz fire, Neviusia cliftonii, post-wildfire response, Shasta snow-wreath, vegetative reproduction __________________________________________________________________________ Shasta snow-wreath (Neviusia cliftonii) is a rare shrub of the Rosaceae: tribe Kerrieae endemic to the southeastern Klamath Mountains in the general vicinity of Shasta Lake, Shasta County, California. The species was discovered less than 30 years ago (Shevock et al. 1992; Taylor 1993) and initially considered a limestone obligate. Subsequent occurrences have also been found on various non-limestone substrates (Lindstrand and Nelson 2005a, b, 2006; DeWoody et al. 2012; Jules et al. 2017). The only congener, Alabama snow-wreath (Neviusia alabamensis), also has a limited range restricted to several disjunct populations in the southeastern United States and occurs on limestone and non-limestone sedimentary substrates (Long 1989; Freiley 1994). Shasta snow-wreath is deciduous and produces flowers with showy white stamens, five toothed green sepals, and rarely, one to three narrow white petals. Based on our observations since its discovery, the species reproduces vegetatively, forming thickets of stems from the root system. Despite observations of developing achenes, no viable seed nor seedlings have been collected or observed. We are not aware of any pollinators and the blooms lack detect- able scent.
    [Show full text]