The Macchiaioli As "Proto-Impressionists": Realism, Popular Science and the Re-Shaping of Macchia Romanticism, 1862-1886
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Macchiaioli as "Proto-Impressionists": Realism, Popular Science and the Re-shaping of Macchia Romanticism, 1862-1886 NORMA F. BROUDE In the current literature of nineteenth-century Italian painting, the In its original form, as an esthetic based upon the principles of Tuscan Macchiaioli are frequently described as "proto-Impression French Romanticism,4 the macchia flourished as an organized and ists," as an early group of plein air painters, who, though less dar productive movement i~ Florence for a relatively brief period, ap ing and unquestionably less brilliant than their better-known and proximately seven years, between 1855 and 1862.5 By the early somewhat younger contemporaries, the French Impressionists, fol 1860's, new influences from France-in particular, word of Cour lowed nevertheless a line of inquiry which surely anticipated bet's Realism-had begun to reach Florence.6 In 1862, Telemaco theirs.1 Signorini's expression of dissatisfaction with qualities in his work This approach to the Macchiaioli as proto-impressionistic "patch" which he now considered to be "troppo soggettivo e individuale" is painters, though misleading, has informed much of the scholarly undoubtedly a reflection of the inroads that had already been made and critical work written in the field since the resurgence of interest into the aesthetic philosophy of the Italians by the standard of ob in the Macchiaioli early in this century. It has been fostered not jective naturalism.7 In this sense, 1862, the year in which the only by a persistent misinterpretation of the name of the group and macchia is said to have died, does indeed mark a definite turning by a biased emphasis upon only a certain area of its work,2 but also point in the history of the movement. For while several of the by an uncritical acceptance on the part of scholars of a series of es Macchiaioli had been sketching from nature as early as 1854,8 and says by the sculptor and early friend of the Macchiaioli, Adriano many of them, after 1859 especially, had turned increasingly to Cecioni, essays in which the original program and activities of the contemporary rural life for thematic material, the attitude with group are described in terms which would clearly seem to relate which they had approached this material had been essentially a Ro the Italian movement to French Impressionism.3 These often-quoted mantic one. During the early sixties, however, certain aspects of and highly influential essays, however, were written by Cecioni not this attitude began to change, and gradually a few of the artists in the early 1860's, as an immediate response to events witnessed in the original group began to look upon their art more exclusively and experiences shared with his painter-friends, but in the early as the recording of visual experience than as the reflection of the 1880's, at a remove of more than twenty-five years from the actual feelings which these experiences had evoked. Among the Macchia inception of the macchia movement. The prevailing assumption of ioli and their friends, those who were most deeply influenced in Cecioni's accuracy and reliability as a reporter, therefore, though their own work by the rising tide of Realism were Telemaco Si unchallenged by modern scholarship, is nevertheless unfounded, gnorini and Adriano Cecioni, both of whom are thought of today for it fails to take into consideration the impressive time lapse in as the principal theorists and chroniclers of the original macchia volved and the actual circumstances and influences under which movement. Cecioni's late essays were written. Our purpose here will be to sort By 1862, the macchia, understood in Romantic terms as the po out the various influences which, in the 1860's and seventies, did in etically evocative chiaroscuro "effect" of a painting, was no longer fact seriously modify and re-shape Cecioni's thought, and to trace a new or controversial idea for progressive artists in Florence, many the process by which the original concept of the macchia underwent of whom were already beginning to look toward Realism for the a significant theoretical transformation in the hands of Cecioni and current and vital issues of the day. Nevertheless, many of the values other late chroniclers of the movement as well. and aesthetic principles which the Macchiaioli had derived from their 1 See, e.g., Lionello Venturi, Italian Painting from Caravaggio to Modi that "verso il 1862 questa ricerca artistica che aveva fatto il suo gliani, New York, 1952, 100, 115-16; also, Enrico Somare, Signorini, tempo mori senza onor di sepoltura" (Telemaco Signorini, "Cose Milan, 1926, 29. d'arte," Il Risorgimento, 1874; reprinted in Somare, Signorini, 256- 2 See Norma F. Broude, "The Macchiaioli: Effect and Expression in 57). Nineteenth-Century Florentine Painting," Art Bulletin, 52, 1970, 11- 6 The art of Courbet was apparently not one of the initial influences 21. upon the Italians, none of whom gave any indication of even having 3 Cecioni's collected writings have appeared in the foliowing editions: been aware of the Pavillon du Realisme in 1855 (see Roberto Longhi, Adriano Cecioni, Scritti e ricordi, ed. Gustavo Uzielli, Florence, 1905; "II Impressionismo e il gusto degli italiani," intro. to John Rewald, Adriano Cecioni, Opere e scritti, ed. Enrico Somare, Milan, 1932. Storia dell'Impressionismo, trans. Antonio Boschetto, Florence, 1949, 4 For a discussion of the aesthetic and its relationship to French xi). Although the Italians had in all probability been exposed to Romanticism, see Broude, "The Macchiaioli," 15-18. Courbet's work by 1861 (in that year, Signorini, Cabianca and Banti 5 These dates are suggested by Telemaco Signorini, who, in an article made their own first trip to Paris), we find nowhere in the writings written in 1874, describes the visit of three Italian artists to the Paris of the artists or their associates any indication of precisely when it Exposition of 1855 as the event primarily responsible for the birth was that the Macchiaioli first became seriously interested in the of the new aesthetic, while further on in the same article, he declares Frenchman's work. MACCHIAIOLI 405 experiments of the 1850's were not entirely or immediately super clio reconstruction of that which has first been grasped and "created seded by the newer ideas. The change in their thinking took place with the mind."10 gradually, it would appear, and even as late as 1873, we find echoes Despite these similarities, however, there are several indications of the older attitudes in an essay by Adriano Cecioni. Though not in this essay of an important difference between Cecioni' s aesthetic dealing directly with the Macchiaioli, this essay, entitled "On the assumptions and those of the older, Romantic school. He writes: Importance of Technical Facility in Art," provides important in The choice is free; the subject, reality; the aim, truth. Everything is sights into the practices and procedures which then prevailed among beautiful in nature from the point of view of art because everything is the Florentines and indicates the extent to which the Realist aesthetic, made up of the same elements, i.e., light, color, chiaroscuro and drawing. by the early seventies, had affected the conception then current of Differences in thematic choice do not account for the greater or lesser beauty of a work of art.... the relationship between art and nature. Cecioni writes: Everything must be sure and decisive, without the sacrifice of the smallest detail; the total effect must be obtained by means of that in Art, considered today as interpretation of nature, has a great mission finite gradation which is in nature. to accomplish. Art must be the medium for the reproduction of that A field, for example, is one color and, at the same time, thousands of which impresses us in nature; and when, with a work of art, we succeed colors, by virtue of the play which light creates over it, and because of in producing the same sensation, only then will art have fulfilled its the many small plantlets intermingled with the grass, all different in function .... form and color; all of this must be interpreted and distinguished by Art must be that which surprises nature in both her normal and means of extremely fine observation.11 unusual moments and effects. Since this surprise, embodied in a work of art, succeeds in producing the same effect produced in us by nature, The fine optical distinctions upon which the writer dwells here raise the means employed must be the result of serious consideration. Nat~re certain questions. What precisely, we should ask, does Cecioni now produces her effects without laboring excessively over them, and the mean when he speaks of the sensations that are evoked and repro artist must be able to do the same thing. Among the artist's most essen tial skills is that of quick analysis, by means of which he must acquire duced by a work of art? By "sensazione" in this context, is he refer the mastery that will enable him to seize those strange and wondrous ring (as did the Barbizon painters and the original Macchiaioli) to effects that do not last long enough to be tranquilly copied. Proportion, something subjective and emotional in the artist's experience, or is point of view, chiaroscuro and the relationship among the tones are the most important things .... It is necessary to determine everything the allusion now to something that is more purely visual and ob before beginning to paint, and then, with the aid of a serious elaboration, jective? to begin to render with colors that which has first been created with the Answers to these questions emerge from yet another essay by mind.