Annual Report 2002 EFTA Surveillance Authority Rue De Trèves 74 B-1040 Brussels Summary 2001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2002 EFTA Surveillance Authority Rue De Trèves 74 B-1040 Brussels Summary 2001 Annual Report 2002 EFTA Surveillance Authority Rue de Trèves 74 B-1040 Brussels www.eftasurv.int Summary 2001 Foreword The Agreement on the European Economic Area has now been in force for nine years. The Agreement continues to ensure access to an increasingly important Internal Market, and is a cornerstone of trade policy in the EFTA States. With its dynamic character, the EEA Agreement has stood the test of time. Just as the Agreement functions in parallel with the EC Treaty to ensure a homogenous Internal Market, the Authority works in parallel with the European Commission to ensure that the Agreement is implemented and applied in an equal manner throughout the European Economic Area. It is worth noting, however, that certain Articles of the EC Treaty, which have been added since 1992, are not reflected in the EEA Agreement. There is a growing concern that differences between the EC Treaty and the EEA Agreement may eventually result in an Internal Market moving at different speeds, thus reducing the efficiency of the Internal Market. During 2002, considerable effort was made by the EFTA States to improve their implementation records for EEA law. These efforts have been fruitful: all the EFTA States now figure among the EEA countries with the highest implementation scores. Statistics show that the number of cases dealt with by the Authority in 2002 has been reduced compared to the previous year. This can be attributed in part to the improved implementation records of the EFTA States, and in part to a gradual shift in focus of the Authority’s tasks towards resolution of complaints and examination of implementing legislation and away from legislative notification by EFTA States. In order to be better equipped to handle its future workload and to be more flexible, the Authority, in 2002, merged the Goods Directorate and the Persons, Services and Capital Movements Directorate into a new Internal Market Affairs Directorate. In 2002, the Authority focused its attention particularly on the free movement of services and the free movement of capital. More open financial and capital markets being an important goal. The Authority dealt with discriminatory practices and provisions that also, in effect or indirectly, limited the free movement of capital. This focus will continue in 2003. An important task for the Authority remains to secure compliance with the competition and state aid rules of the EEA Agreement. Food safety remains an important issue for citizens in the EFTA States. This field has been and will continue to be a priority within the Authority, both with respect to veterinary inspections and implementation control of EEA rules in this area. Over the last years, the Authority has noticed increased media attention on its activities. While the Authority welcomes this recognition of the importance of its work, a perception in the EFTA States that the Authority is creating, rather than simply applying, EEA law has not gone unnoticed. It is important to bear in mind that the Authority is an organisation whose tasks are of a legal nature – it is not a political body. Moreover, the EEA Agreement, including its secondary legislation, is agreed upon by the EFTA States. The Authority has no legislative powers. Looking forward, the enlargement of the European Union will enhance the importance of the EEA Agreement to the EFTA States. Although the existing imbalances between the two pillars of the EEA will increase even further, the Authority will continue to play a central role in ensuring that the EFTA States remain equal partners in the European Economic Area, bound by the same internal market principles and rules as the EU Member States. Einar M. Bull President Summary 2001 Table of Contents 1 SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 5 3 THE EEA AGREEMENT 6 3.1 THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA 6 3.2 THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY 6 3.2.1 Tasks and competences 9 3.2.2 Organisation 9 3.2.2.1 College 9 3.2.2.2 Departments 9 3.2.2.3 Staff and recruitment 9 3.2.2.4 Medium Term Plan of the Authority 11 3.2.3 Information activities 12 4 FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS, PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL 13 4.1 INTRODUCTION 13 4.2 STATISTICS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECTIVES AND CASE HANDLING 13 4.2.1 Implementation control 13 4.2.2 INFORMATION RELATIVE TO IMPLEMENTATION 14 4.2.3 IMPLEMENTATION STATUS OF DIRECTIVES 14 4.2.3.1 All directives 14 4.2.3.2 Directives to be complied with in 2001 15 4.2.4 CASE HANDLING 16 4.2.5 INFRINGEMENT CASES 18 4.2.6 CLOSURES AND OPEN CASES 22 4.3 FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS 23 4.3.1 Introduction 23 4.3.2 Basic provisions on the free movement of goods 23 4.3.3 Discriminatory taxation 24 4.3.4 Secondary legislation with regards to technical regulations, standards, testing and certification 26 4.3.4.1 Motor Vehicles 26 4.3.4.2 Construction Plant and Equipment 26 4.3.4.3 Medicinal products 26 4.3.4.4 Environment Protection 27 4.3.4.5 Machinery 27 4.3.4.6 Medical Devices 27 4.3.4.7 Dangerous Substances 27 V 2002 EFTA Surveillance Authority 4.3.5 Operation of certain procedures 27 4.3.5.1 Information procedure on draft technical regulations 27 4.3.5.2 National measures derogating from the principle of free movement of goods 28 4.3.5.3 Notification procedures on chemicals 29 4.3.5.4 Safeguard measures with regard to unsafe products in accordance with specific Directives 29 4.3.5.5 Notification of conformity assessment bodies 29 4.3.6 Energy 30 4.3.7 Product Liability 30 4.3.8 Intellectual Property 30 4.4 FOOD SAFETY 30 4.4.1 Introduction 30 4.4.2 Foodstuffs 31 4.4.2.1 Implementation control 31 4.4.2.2 Reporting tasks 31 4.4.3 Veterinary issues 32 4.4.3.1 Implementation control 32 4.4.3.2 Complaints 32 4.4.3.3 Application of the Agreement 33 4.4.4 Feedingstuffs 34 4.4.5 Seeds 34 4.4.6 Product Safety 34 4.4.6.1. Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) 34 4.4.6.2. Non-food products (RAPEX) 35 4.5 FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS 35 4.5.1 Free Movement of Workers 35 4.5.1.1 Implementation control 35 4.5.1.2 Complaints 36 4.5.1.3 Own-initiative cases 37 4.5.2 Mutual recognition of professional qualifications 38 4.5.2.1 Implementation control 38 4.5.2.2 Complaints 38 4.5.3 Right of establishment 39 4.5.3.1 Implementation control 39 4.5.3.2 Complaints 39 4.5.4 Social security 41 4.5.4.1 Implementation control 42 4.5.4.2 Complaints 42 4.6 FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES 42 4.6.1 Financial Services 43 4.6.1.1 Banking 43 4.6.1.2 Insurance 44 VI 4.6.1.3 Stock exchange and securities 45 4.6.2 Information Society and Postal Services 46 4.6.2.1 Audiovisual Services 46 4.6.2.2 Electronic communication services 47 4.6.2.3 Data protection 47 4.6.2.4 Information society services 47 4.6.2.5 Postal services 47 4.6.3 Transport 47 4.6.3.1 Road, inland and railway transport 47 4.6.3.2 Inland waterway transport 48 4.6.3.3 Maritime transport 48 4.6.3.4 Civil Aviation 50 4.6.4 Non-harmonised service sectors 50 4.6.4.1 Complaints 50 4.6.4.2 Own-initiative cases 52 4.7 FREE MOVEMENT OF CAPITAL 53 4.7.1 Application control 53 4.7.2 Complaints 54 4.8 HORIZONTAL AREAS RELEVANT TO THE FOUR FREEDOMS 54 4.8.1 Introduction 54 4.8.2 Health and Safety at Work 54 4.8.3 Labour law 56 4.8.4 Equal treatment for men and women 57 4.8.5 Consumer protection 58 4.8.6 Environment 59 4.8.6.1 General provisions 59 4.8.6.2 Water and Air 60 4.8.6.3 Chemicals, industrial risk and biotechnology 60 4.8.6.5 Complaints 60 4.8.7 Company law 60 4.8.7.1 Basic Company law 61 4.8.7.1.1 Implementation control 61 4.8.7.1.2 Complaints 62 4.8.7.2 Accounting and auditing 62 4.8.8 Statistics 62 5 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT 63 5.1 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL OVERVIEW 63 5.2 IMPLEMENTATION CONTROL 63 5.3 APPLICATION OF THE RULES ON PUBLIC PROCUREMENT 64 5.4 MANAGEMENT TASKS 67 6 COMPETITION 68 VII 6.1 INTRODUCTION 68 2002 EFTA Surveillance Authority 6.2 CASES 63 6.2.1 Overview 63 6.2.2 Broadcasting and media 70 6.2.3 Telecommunications 71 6.2.4 Postal services 71 6.2.5 Energy 71 6.2.6 Insurance 71 6.2.7 Other cases 72 6.3 CO-OPERATION WITH THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 72 6.3.1 Co-operation in individual merger cases 72 6.3.2 Co-operation in other Commission cases 72 6.3.3 Consultation on legislative reform and general policy 74 6.4 NEW ACTS 75 6.4.1 Legislation 75 6.4.2 Non-binding acts 75 6.4.3 Hearing officer 76 6.5 IMPLEMENTATION CONTROL 77 6.6 LIAISON WITH NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 77 7 STATE AID 79 7.1 MAIN RULES OF THE EEA AGREEMENT 79 7.2 DEVELOPMENT OF STATE AID RULES 80 7.2.1 Legislation 80 7.2.2 The Authority’s State Aid Guidelines 80 7.3 CASES 81 7.3.1 Statistics on cases 81 7.3.2 Aid for Research and Development (R&D) 81 7.3.3 Aid for environmental protection 82 7.3.4 State guarantees 82 7.3.5 Aid to the film industry 83 7.3.6 Aid to shipbuilding 83 7.3.7 Aid to maritime transport 84 7.3.8 Aid to the aviation sector 84 7.3.9 Regional aid 85 7.3.10 Other cases 85 7.4 CO-OPERATION WITH THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 86 7.5 OTHER TASKS 86 7.5.1 Annual reporting on existing aid schemes 86 8 THE AUTHORITY BEFORE THE EFTA COURT AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE 87 8.1 CASES BEFORE THE EFTA COURT 87 8.2 CASES BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 87 VIII ANNEX: List of directives taken over into the EEA Agreement in 2002 91 Summary 2001 1 Summary The task of the EFTA Surveillance Authority is, together with that 33% of the acts applicable under the EEA Agreement the European Commission, to ensure the fulfilment of the had been fully implemented by the EFTA States.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2008 2008 in Brief
    PUBLICATION 2009:32 Annual Report 2008 2008 in brief • Vehicle mileage has fallen by 0.9 per cent for passenger cars, but remained unchanged for heavy vehicles. • SEK 9 826 million was invested in the road network, SEK 1 251 million of which was invested in targeted measures to increase road safety on state roads. • Traffic flow was separated on another 230 km of the busiest roads. A total 4 000 km of roads now have traffic flow separation, 1 950 km of which are 2+1 roads. • 420 people (preliminary figures) were killed as a result of road accidents. About 3 730 people were seriously injured according to police reports. • Some 277 000 passenger cars were registered. • About 635 000 driving licences were issued. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS CONSTITUTE THE SWEDISH ROAD ADMINISTRATION (SRA) ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT: Section Page Goals and results Environment 34 Business division activities Vägverket Produktion: Quality and the environment 58 SRA Consulting Services: Quality and the environment 59 SRA Ferry Operations: Quality and the environment 61 Environmentally related information in the SRA’s sustainability report. The SRA’s sustainability report includes all sustainability information in the SRA’s Annual Report 2008 and the SRA’s Sustainability Report 2008. Both documents need to be read to obtain a complete picture of the SRA’s work with sustainable development. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) register on the website vv.se can be used as guidance for certain GRI related information. (Only available in Swedish.) The Road Transport Sector Read more about developments in the road transport system and Sectoral Report 2008 SRA activities in The Road Transport Sector – Sectoral Report 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Solutions for Transport in Norway
    09.06.2017 Challenges and solutions for transport in Norway Therese Ustvedt, adviser Director General’s Staff Norwegian Public Roads Administration National Transport Plan 2018-2029 Transport Network Public roads, total 94 600 km - National roads 10 700 km - County roads 44 500 km - Municipal roads 39 400 km Road tunnels 1 100 tunnels Road bridges 18 200 bridges Rail network 4 200 km Rail tunnels 736 tunnels Rail bridges 2 577 bridges State owned airports 45 airports National ports 32 ports National Transport Plan 2018-2029 1 09.06.2017 The Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget) The Norwegian Government (Regjeringen) Ministry of Transport and Communication Norwegian Norwegian Public Roads Norwegian Railway Norwegian Coastal air traffic authority Administration Directorate Administration Avinor AS (Statens vegvesen) (Jernbanedirektoratet) (Kystverket) National Transport Plan 2018-2029 Background • In 1998, the Government directed the four transport agencies to prepare a joint proposal for the first long-term national transport plan (for the period 2002-2011). • The fifth joint input from the transport agencies was presented in February 2016. • The Government presented the white paper on transport to the Storting in April 2017. • The white paper presents a plan that will apply for the period 2018-2029. • The Storting will adopt the white paper in June 2017. National Transport Plan 2018-2029 2 09.06.2017 Official Steering Documents National Transport Plan (12 Year Period) Action Programme (Focus on first 4 Years) Annual National Budget Appropriation Projects National Transport Plan 2018-2029 Overall goal A transport system that is safe, promotes economic growth and contributes to the transition into a low- emission society.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in (Insert Country Name Here)
    Doing Business in Norway: 2014 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2014. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • Chapter 1: Doing Business In Norway • Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment • Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services • Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment • Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards • Chapter 6: Investment Climate • Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing • Chapter 8: Business Travel • Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events • Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business In Norway • Market Overview • Market Challenges • Market Opportunities • Market Entry Strategy Market Overview Return to top Nordic Region • The Nordic region (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland) with its 1.7 trillion dollar plus economy is considered one of the ten largest economies in the world, and the fifth largest market in Europe. It is considered worldwide to be a test market for new sophisticated products/technology and an easy-to-enter export market for new and new-to-export companies. English is widely spoken, business agreements are reliable, and the infrastructure is first rate. The Nordic countries have close ties to the United States culturally, politically, and historically. There are great opportunities for American businesses. • The Nordic countries are closely related in terms of language (except for Finland), ethnic roots, religion, history and a host of other ways, but they also differ in many ways. Norway • Norway is a modern, energy-rich country with 5.1 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • NORWAY TRANSPORT the Progressive Electrification of Land and Maritime Transport
    NORWAY TRANSPORT The progressive electrification of land and maritime transport THIS CASE STUDY IS AN ANALYSIS CARRIED OUT AS PART OF THE ANNUAL SYNTHESIS REPORT ON SECTORAL CLIMATE ACTION DOWNLOAD THE GLOBAL REPORT AND OTHER CASE STUDIES AT WWW.CLIMATE-CHANCE.ORG TRANSPORT CASE STUDY NORWAY 2019 NORWAY The progressive electrification of land and maritime transport Author • Guillaume Simonet • Consultant and independant researcher, Abstraction Services Accounting for over 29 % of Norway’s overall CO2 emissions, transport-related emissions have fallen sharply since 2012. This trend is mainly due to the fact all stakeholders made significant efforts to progressively electrify both the vehicle fleet and maritime transport. Road freight and domestic air travel are already in line as the next upcoming challenges. Norwegian local governments’ efforts in terms of public transit in urban areas have delivered real results but did not lead to a fall in transport demand at the national level. Only train journeys have recently decreased. •1 Key takeaways Norway witnessed a decline The increasing urbanisation of in its transport CO emissions, the Norwegian population, as well as 2 TRANSPORT decreasing by 11.4 % between 2012 and the multi-level consultation tools (Urban 2018, yet national CO2 emissions remain relatively Environment Agreements) and the public stable. expenditure orientation of the National Transport Plan (NTP) make cities the driving NORWAY This decrease is mostly due to forces for the development of public and low- the decarbonation of the vehicle fleet impact transport. Oslo, where in 2016 there were even with the rise in demand for more trips by public transit than by car, is a transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance in Maritime Passenger Transport: Green Public
    Article Governance in Maritime Passenger Transport: Green y Public Procurement of Ferry Services Kristin Ystmark Bjerkan * , Hampus Karlsson *, Rebecka Snefuglli Sondell, Sigrid Damman and Solveig Meland SINTEF, Postboks 4760 Torgarden, 7465 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] (R.S.S.); [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (S.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.Y.B.); [email protected] (H.K.) This paper is an extended version of a paper presented at 32nd International Electric Vehicle Symposium 2019 y (EVS 32), Lyon, France, 19–22 May 2019. Received: 3 October 2019; Accepted: 4 November 2019; Published: 6 November 2019 Abstract: Governance is central for sustainability transitions in maritime transport. Norwegian authorities can directly influence developments in maritime transport through green public procurement, and low- or zero-emission technologies have been or are being considered for more than 250 operational ferry and high-speed vessel connections. This study explores practices of green public procurement and investigates procuring authorities and operators’ perspectives on the efficiency of green public procurement in accelerating sustainability transitions. Through review of calls for tender and interviews with procuring authorities and operators, the study identifies critical issues for green public procurement to accelerate maritime passenger transport toward sustainability. The critical issues are related to either procedural or service delivery issues. Procedural issues refer to timelines with multiple calls on the same time and different views of procurers and operators on the ideal duration of contracts. The most demanding service delivery issues are infrastructure for charging and energy capacity in remote areas where operators have to pre-book energy needs based on rough estimations which in turn increase the tender price.
    [Show full text]
  • The State Ownership Report 2012
    THE STATE OWNERSHIP REPORT 2012 1 CONTENTS The Norwegian State Ownership Report 2012 comprises 53 companies in which the ministries administer the State’s direct ownership interests. The report covers the companies where the State as owner mainly has commercial objectives and the most important companies with sectoral policy objectives. Foreword by the Minister 3 Companies with commercial Regional health authorities The State Ownership Report 2012 5 and other specifically defined objectives Central Norway Regional Health Authority 100 The year 2012 for the State as a shareholder 7 Eksportfinans ASA 62 Northern Norway Regional Health Authority 101 Return and values 11 Electronic Chart Centre AS 63 South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 102 Key figures describing financial developments 17 Investinor AS 64 Western Norway Regional Health Authority 103 Other key figures 23 Kommunalbanken AS 65 External articles 32 NSB AS 66 The State’s administration of its ownership 41 Posten Norge AS 67 Statkraft SF 68 Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani AS 69 Companies with commercial objectives Companies with sectoral policy objectives Shareholder-elected and owner-appointed board members 104 Argentum Fondsinvesteringer AS 46 Avinor AS 72 Contact information 108 Baneservice AS 47 Bjørnøen AS 73 Comments and definitions 109 Cermaq ASA 48 Enova SF 74 Entra Holding AS 49 Gassco AS 75 Flytoget AS 50 Gassnova SF 76 Mesta AS 51 Innovation Norway 77 SAS AB 52 Kings Bay AS 78 Veterinærmedisinsk Oppdragssenter AS 53 Nofima AS 79 Norfund 80 Norwegian Seafood
    [Show full text]
  • A Sectoral Innovation System Analysis of the Transport Sector in Norway and Canada in Light of the Paris Agreement
    sustainability Review Many Miles to Paris: A Sectoral Innovation System Analysis of the Transport Sector in Norway and Canada in Light of the Paris Agreement Konstantinos Koasidis 1 , Anastasios Karamaneas 1, Alexandros Nikas 1,* , Hera Neofytou 1 , Erlend A. T. Hermansen 2, Kathleen Vaillancourt 3 and Haris Doukas 1 1 Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Politechniou 9, 157 80 Athens, Greece; [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (H.N.); [email protected] (H.D.) 2 CICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, P.O. Box 1129, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] 3 ESMIA Consultants, Blainville, QC J7B 6B4, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-210-772-3612 Received: 16 June 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; Published: 20 July 2020 Abstract: Transport is associated with high amounts of energy consumed and greenhouse gases emitted. Most transport means operate using fossil fuels, creating the urgent need for a rapid transformation of the sector. In this research, we examine the transport systems of Norway and Canada, two countries with similar shares of greenhouse gas emissions from transport and powerful oil industries operating within their boundaries. Our socio-technical analysis, based on the Sectoral Innovation Systems approach, attempts to identify the elements enabling Norway to become one of the leaders in the diffusion of electric vehicles, as well as the differences pacing down progress in Canada. By utilising the System Failure framework to compare the two systems, bottlenecks hindering the decarbonisation of the two transport systems are identified.
    [Show full text]
  • The Know Norwaybook
    International and Comparative Studies in Education and Public Information Norway is a country of winter darkness and midnight sun, advanced technology, small towns and a few cities. It has a big The Know NORWAY Book government sector, free education and Background for Understanding the Country and Its People health services, and a modern and dynamic private sector. Pakistan and Afghanistan Edition Norway is home to large communities of Pakistani, Afghan and other immigrants and refugees. Norway is one of the world’s richest and most egalitarian societies. The country’s beauty has made tourism a major income-earner, and fishing, shipping and shipbuilding industries are still important. In the last generation, North Sea oil and gas production has made Norway one of the world’s largest oil exporters – and the Norwegians are now nicknamed “the blue-eyed sheikhs”. PRINTED IN PAKISTAN Mr.Books Atle Hetland Mr.Books Sang-e-Meel Sang-e-Meel The Know NORWAY Book Background for Understanding the Country and Its People Pakistan and Afghanistan Edition Atle Hetland Published in 2010 by Mr. Books Publishers and Booksellers, Islamabad, Pakistan www.mrbook.com.pk ISBN 969-516-166-9 This book, or part thereof, may not be reproduced in print or electronlic form without the permission from the author. Sections may, however, be reproduced for internal use by educational and research institutions and organizations, with reference given to the book. Copyright © Atle Hetland 2010 All rights reserved Author: Atle Hetland English Language and Editorial Consultant: Fiona Torrens-Spence Graphic Artist and Design: Salman Beenish Views expressed and analyses in this publication are those of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Public Transport in Norway
    Summary: Funding public transport in Norway TØI Report 1176/2011 Author(s): Silvia J. Olsen, Knut Sandberg Eriksen, Nils Fearnley and Frode Longva Oslo 2011, 84 pages Norwegian language The report presents and discusses three alternative models for funding public transport - the State Model, the Local Model and the Project Model. This is done through a study of experiences with the current Norwegian model, as well as a review of international experiences and assessments on whether these experiences are transferable. The discussion concludes that all the alternative models encourage faster project realization and are thus more economically efficient than the current model Challenges Important funding solutions in the current Norwegian model includes public transfers in the form of state and county grants, user fees, and government grant schemes such as the Ministry’s incentive scheme to improve public transport and reduce the use of cars in urban areas. In sum, these elements constitute a framework of formal and legal procedures for financing. The study of national experiences shows that if the goals set for public transport are to be reached, the current level of funding is insufficient. It also questioned whether the current model ensures a good selection of public transport projects, and whether each city receives funding according to their individual needs. The division of responsibility between the various levels of government affects how each actor considers their responsibility to fund public transport, and the extent to which they desire control over the grants given. A study on how the general funding solutions are applied in specific city transport packages is also carried out, including the cities of Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim, Stavanger and Grenland (Skien/Porsgrunn).
    [Show full text]
  • Information Requirements for International Truck Drivers in Norway
    Information Requirements for International Truck Drivers in Norway Marek Makulec Master's Thesis Submission date: June 2015 Supervisor: Trude Tørset, BAT Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Civil and Transport Engineering NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING Report Title: Date:10.06.2015 Information Requirements for International Truck Drivers Number of pages (incl. appendices): in Norway 93 Master Thesis X Project Work Name: Marek Makulec Professor in charge/supervisor: Trude Tørset Other external professional contacts/supervisors: Toril Presttun, Tomas Levin, Marek Wojciechowski Abstract: The purpose of this project is to investigate hypothesis whether poor performance of foreign heavy goods vehicles drivers in very challenging Norwegian conditions is effect of lack of information. If so, then which information should be provided. When? Whe re? Data was obtained through mixed-mode survey (face-to-face interviews and self-assisted form) in multiple locations in the country. Local and foreign truckers were asked about information they have and would like to have, while driving in Norway. After analysis of three subgroups of respondents (Norwegians, foreign after introductory programme and random foreign) conclusion was reached, that drivers want general information (i.e. traffic conditions). However, what they need the most is training covering both theory and practice on driving in winter conditions. Celem tego projektu jest sprawdzenie hipotezy, czy problemy, które tworz ą zagraniczni kierowcy ci ęż arowi w bardzo trudnych norweskich warunkach drogowych s ą spowodowane brakiem informacji. Je żeli t ak jest, to jak ą wiedz ę nale ży im udost ępni ć. Kiedy? Gdzie? Dane zostały zebrane podczas ankiet mixed-mode (rozmowy przeprowadzane przez ankietera oraz formularz do samodzielnego wypełnienia) w kilku miejscach w całym kraju.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Baltic Task 5.5 the Market for Intermodal Transport in the Trans Baltic Port-Hinterland Corridor to the Ferry Link Gdynia – Karlskrona”
    ody Rapport 2010:X Trans Baltic task 5.5 The market for intermodal transport in the Trans Baltic Port-Hinterland Corridor to the ferry link Gdynia – Karlskrona Fredrik Bärthel Edith Sorkina Michael Malmquist Trans Baltic task 5.5 The market for intermodal transport in the Port- Hinterland Corridor to the ferry link Gdynia – Karlskrona PREFACE During the spring 2012 Vectura has accomplished the study ”Trans Baltic task 5.5 The market for intermodal transport in the Trans Baltic Port-Hinterland Corridor to the ferry link Gdynia – Karlskrona”. The study has been accomplished in close co-operation with the client Region Blekinge and the shipping line Stena Line. This report is the final reporting of the project and includes description and analysis of the market conditions as a basis the establishment of an intermodal hinterland connection to/from the Port of Karlskrona The work has been accomplished by the following researchers; Lina Wells, Vectura Consulting (Project Leader until March 1st, 2012) Fredrik Bärthel, Vectura Consulting (Project Leader from March 1st, 2012) Edith Sorkina, Vectura Consulting Michael Malmquist, Vectura Consulting Marcin Wolek, Protrans (subconsultant) This report has been written by Fredrik Bärthel and Edith Sorkina, Vectura Consulting, who also are responsible for the content of the report. A steering group has been appointed to work in close co-operation with the researchers. Vectura want to address a thank you to the study's funders, the person listed above as well as others who favorably, for example, to be interviewed, contributed to this study could be conducted in a positive spirit, and that interesting results and valuable information emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on the Freight and Logistics Model
    SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME THEME [SST.2010.1.3-1.] [Transport modelling for policy impact assessments] Grant agreement for: Coordination and support action Acronym: Transtools 3 Full title: „Research and development of the European Transport Network Model – Transtools Version 3 Proposal/Contract no.: MOVE/FP7/266182/TRANSTOOLS 3 Start date: 1st March 2011 Duration: 70 months Deliverable 7.2 – Final report on the freight and logistics model Document number: TT3_WP7_D7.2_Freight and logistics model_3.0 Work package: WP7 Deliverable nature: Report Dissemination level: Public Lead beneficiary: DTU, participant 1, Otto Anker Nielsen Due date of deliverable: 30.06.2016 Date of preparation of deliverable: 25.08.2016 Date of last change: 11.11.2016 Date of approval by Commission: 01.12.2016 Abstract: This report D7.2 of the Transtools 3 project contains descriptions (including the mathematical equations) of the estimation results for models explaining the flows of goods per commodity class between zones in Europe (trade models) using aggregate data on these flows in combination with explanatory variables on the zones and the transport resistance between each pair of zones. It also contains outcomes for unit cost functions for road, rail, inland waterways, sea and air transport as well estimation results for the logistics model (transport chain choice model) on disaggregate data sources (the French ECHO survey; the Swedish Commodity Flow survey 2009) and level-of-service information from the networks. Keywords: Freight transport model, logistics model, trade model, freight transport cost functions Author(s): de Jong, Gerard; Nielsen, Otto Anker; Anders Fjendbo Jensen, Mikkel Thorhauge, Henriques, Michael, Tanner, Reto; Johnson, Daniel; Dekker, Thijs; Sowa, Victor; Vierth, Inge; Bates, John; Jeppe, Rich Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the European Union.
    [Show full text]