NWIRP Dallas Is an Aerospace Manufacturing Complex Constructed in 1941 As Part of the U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NWIRP Dallas Is an Aerospace Manufacturing Complex Constructed in 1941 As Part of the U.S I NTEGRATED C ULTURAL R ESOURCES M ANAGEMENT P LAN HISTORIC CONTEXT INTRODUCTION NWIRP Dallas is an aerospace manufacturing complex constructed in 1941 as part of the U.S. World War II Industrial Mobilization Program. Known as Plancor #25, NWIRP Dallas initially consisted of 85 buildings and structures spread out over 153 acres in rural Dallas County, near the city limits of both Dallas and Grand Prairie, Texas. The original project owner, the DPC, was a governmental body assigned to fund and build a variety of industrial facilities across the United States that produced essential military goods for World War II. North American Aviation Inc. leased the government- owned plant from 1941 to August 1945, producing nearly 30,000 aircraft of three different types for the Army, Air Force, and Navy. NWIRP Dallas has been leased to six different tenants over the past six decades: North American Aviation, TEMCO, Chance Vought Aircraft Corporation, LTV, Northrop Grumman, and Vought Aircraft Industries. Today, the complex consists of 343 resources on 314.66 acres. NWIRP Dallas has a complicated but important history that details the role it played during the Second World War and its significance throughout the Cold War. Its history is not only the story of an aircraft plant but also of the growth of Dallas County and the aircraft industry in North Texas communities. WORLD WAR II In the mid-1930s, there were definite signs that the peace established in Europe following World War I was tenuous. The first indication of trouble appeared in 1933 when Germany elected Adolf Hitler as its Chancellor and demanded equality with France and England, not disarmament. Germany withdrew from the League of Nations and secretly began to rebuild its military, a clear violation of the Treaty of Versailles. In an effort to renew its strength and demonstrate its power, Germany turned to every available technological advance in weaponry to ensure that it would never again be subjugated by Britain, France and the West. On 10 March 1935, Germany’s Defense Minister Herman Göring formally announced his country’s military rearmament program, which included all the latest technological developments in ships, tanks, guns, ammunition, and aircraft. Britain likewise began to rearm, and by the end of the year, all the major European powers and Japan had begun remilitarization programs. It was not only Germany’s aggressive acts and rearmament that threatened peace in Europe; it was also the emergence of dictatorships in Italy, Spain, and Japan. All four countries appeared to NAVAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PAGE 8-1 I NTEGRATED C ULTURAL R ESOURCES M ANAGEMENT P LAN prefer force, propaganda, and fear to effect political change and gain power. Germany took full advantage of its early military preparedness by participating in the Spanish Civil War of 1936–39 and annexing both Austria and Czechoslovakia in 1938. The performance of the German military machine, especially the air force, or Luftwaffe, sent a clear message to Great Britain and France that they had underestimated Germany’s strength. The presence and large numbers of the German airforce in Spain and Czechoslovakia gave Europeans the perception that the Luftwaffe was much larger than anticipated. Following the events of 1936–38, Great Britain, France, and other European allies began to rearm at a frantic pace. In order for European nations to achieve military supremacy over Germany, they would need help. France and Great Britain turned to the United States and its mass-production capability as early as 1935 in hopes of achieving military preparedness, but quickly found out that what they needed most—aircraft—was difficult to procure. America had been the leader in aviation since the late 1910s, but its industry had never mass produced aircraft. For decades, American aircraft companies fabricated each individual plane virtually by hand for a small and elite domestic and foreign market. The number of orders from European nations overwhelmed burgeoning aircraft and engine manufacturers. Fortunately for the aircraft industry and unfortunately for Europe, current American isolationist policy and neutrality laws required belligerent nations to pay cash for military goods, leaving the industry a brief period of time to prepare for the production demands of a large-scale, world war. It was only in May 1939 when a loose— but public—diplomatic alliance developed between the dictatorships of Germany, Japan, and Italy that American leaders began to display and share France and England’s concerns for world peace and stability. The combined strength of the Axis coalition, the quick pace of overseas developments, and the defense needs of European allies provoked American leaders to develop a plan of action and turn away from its isolationist stance toward military preparedness. Any plan developed by the United States would have to balance and integrate foreign requirements and domestic needs without sacrificing or straining productive capabilities, resources, materials, facilities, and manpower. In May 1939, President Franklin D. Roosevelt took the first steps toward mobilization when he ordered his Assistant Secretary of War PAGE 8-2 NAVAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS I NTEGRATED C ULTURAL R ESOURCES M ANAGEMENT P LAN and Assistant Secretary of the Navy to create a War Resources Board to manage the $11 billion defense budget and the newly formed Industrial Mobilization Program. Once planning had begun, the President declared a state of unlimited national emergency in an effort to prepare the American people for the demands of mobilization, which involved an unprecedented level of defense production. The Industrial Mobilization Program called for major changes within the country’s economic and governmental structure and altered the relationship between the private enterprise and the government, forcing them to coordinate activities in order to meet common goals (Kane 1995: 29; Vatter 1985: 10; U.S. Civilian Production Administration 1947: xiii). The Industrial Mobilization Program’s main goals were the nation’s speedy transition from peace to war and back to peace. The program evolved through three major phases: The initial defense period, 1939–41, was characterized as the period when the United States was not actually at war but was compelled to rearm and help its allies, and itself, through weapons production and materials for defense. The second phase occurred from December 1941 until August 1945, and was characterized as the war period, when the entire American economy was directed toward winning the war through the procurement and production of ships, submarines, guns, ammunition, tanks, and aircraft. Finally, the third phase, from August 1945 to December 1947, was characterized as the transition period from World War II to the Cold War (U.S. Civilian Production Administration 1947: xiii, 3). INDUSTRIAL MOBILIZATION: THE DEFENSE PERIOD, 1939–41 The President and a new managing agency, the Office of Production Management, began implementation of the Industrial Mobilization Program in the summer of 1939, prior to Germany’s invasion of Poland. The first step of the program was the formation of the National Defense Advisory Committee, or NDAC. Legislation allowing for the formation of NDAC can be traced to the Army Appropriation Act of 20 August 1916, in which NDAC assumed the responsibility of coordinating industries and resources for the country’s national security and welfare (U.S. Civilian Production Administration 1947: 22). President Roosevelt invoked the law on 29 May 1940 in response to conflicts in Europe and the Far East. The key players of NDAC included the secretaries of War, Navy Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, and Labor, Office of Production Management, and seven at-large members. The President served as head and final arbitrator of NDAC, but he also relied closely on the NAVAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PAGE 8-3 I NTEGRATED C ULTURAL R ESOURCES M ANAGEMENT P LAN advice of its permanent and at-large members. The Army Appropriation Act allowed the President to nominate seven civilian members with “special knowledge of some industry, public utility, or the development of some natural resource, or otherwise specially qualified” (U.S. Civilian Production Administration 1947: 23). Roosevelt’s selections included industry officials, international dignitaries, economists, and financial experts to manage and run the entire program. The President decided that only three members of NDAC needed to serve the Commission on a full-time basis: Danish-born William S. Knudsen, former president of General Motors Corporation (GM), advised on industrial production; Lithuanian-born Sidney Hillman, president of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, advised on employment; and Edward R. Stettinus, who was associated with the United States Steel Corporation, advised on industrial materials and was former chairman of the War Resources Board. Stettinus also had family connections with two of the biggest and most influential businesses in America—E.I. DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and J.P. Morgan & Company (U.S. Civilian Production Administration 1947: 19, 20). The remaining members of NDAC—the commissioners on prices, farm products, transportation, and consumer interests—served only part-time positions. Most of NDAC’s powers were de jure or de facto, and came either directly from the President or through the Office of Production
Recommended publications
  • PDF Download (3
    Frontierswww.boeing.com/frontiers JUNEJULY 20092009 // VolumeVolume VIII,VIII, IssueIssue IIIII wingsNew ScanEagle leads Boeing future in unmanned airborne systems market JULY 2009 / BOEING FRONTIERS BOEING FRONTIERS / JULY 2009 / VOLUME VIII, ISSUE III On the Cover 14 Flying into the future Innovative unmanned aircraft systems such as ScanEagle, developed by Boeing subsidiary Insitu, are helping Boeing expand in one of the fastest-growing markets in aerospace. COVER IMAGE: TRAVIS CIELOHA OF INSITU, WITH THE SCANEAGLE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM. CDR DOUG KIEM/U.S. NAVY PHOTO: SCANEAGLE IN FLIGHT. CDR DOUG KIEM/​U.S. NAVY BOEING FRONTIERS / JULY 2009 / VOLUME VIII, ISSUE III 3 Safer air travel Frontiers Flying today is safer than ever, thanks in large part to the Commercial Publisher: Tom Downey 12 Aviation Safety Team. Working together, representatives from industry, Editorial director: Anne Toulouse government, unions and academia developed and promoted safety initiatives that have improved aviation safety around the globe. EDITORIAL TEAM The team’s efforts recently were recognized with the prestigious Editor: Collier Trophy. Paul Proctor: 312-544-2938 Managing editor (acting): Ann Beach: 312-544-2997 Deputy managing editor: Vineta Plume: 312-544-2954 Out of this world Art director: Brandon Luong: 312-544-2118 For Boeing Mission Control Center employees who design, build and test satellites, the launch is just the beginning. Then comes the critical Commercial Airplanes editor: 24 work of satellite operations. Julie O’Donnell: 206-766-1329 Engineering, Operations & Technology editor: Junu Kim: 312-544-2939 Human Resources and Administration editor: Geoff Potter: 312-544-2946 Apollo 11: A walk to remember Integrated Defense Systems editor: Two Boeing engineers—then a new engineering school graduate and a Diane Stratman: 562-797-1443 28 teenager with lofty aspirations—share the challenges and excitement of Shared Services editor: launching the Apollo 11 mission that put man on the moon 40 years ago Beriah Osorio: 425-577-4157 this summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Download of Your Pictures to Your Computer
    w ww om .estesrockets.c TABLE OF CONTENTS Index . .2 Skill Level 2 Rocket Kits . .26 How To Start . .3 Skill Level 3 Rocket Kits . .30 What to Know . .4 “E” Engine Powered Kits . .32 Model Rocket Safety Code . .5 Blurzz™ Rocket Racers . .33 Ready To Fly Starter Sets . .6 How Model Rocket Engines Work . .34 E2X® Starter Sets . .8 Model Rocket Engine Chart . .35 Ready to Fly Launch Sets . .10 Engine Time/Thrust Curves . .36 E2X® Launch Sets . .12 Model Rocket Accessories . .37 Ready To Fly Rockets . .14 Estes Airplanes . .38 E2X® Rocket Kits . .15 Estes Educator™ Products . .41 Skill Level 1 Rocket Kits . .20 Estes Specialty Products . .42 INDEX 220 Swift™. 21 Lucky Seven . 17 36 D Squared™ . 27 Max Trax® Starter Set. 7 Accessories. 37 Mini Super Shot™ Starter Set . 9 AeroX™ Interceptor™R/C Mobile Launcher. 40 Model Rocket Bulk Packs . 41 Air Force 1 Electric R/C Jet. 39 No. 2 Estes Sky Writer® . 17 Air Powered Action Hero. 43 NSA Starship™ . 7 Air Powered Blast Jets®. 43 Operation Search & Destroy™ Launch Set . 11 Air Show™ Launch Set. 13 Oracle™ Digital Camera Rocket . 19 Alpha®. 21 Outlander™ . 31 Alpha III®. 17 Patriot™ Starter Set. 7 Alpha III® Starter Set . 9 Presidential VIP Electric R/C Jet Airplane. 39 Astrocam® 110 . 19 Quickfire™ Catapult R/C Airplane . 39 Baby Bertha™. 21 Quark™ . 21 Bandito™ . 15 Renegade™ . 31 Big Bertha® . 23 Riptide™ Launch Set. 11 Big Daddy™ . 32 Rocket Bulk Packs. 41 Blue Ninja™ . 17 Rubicon . 25 Blurzz™ Rocket Powered Cars . 33 Scissor Wing Transport™ . 31 Bull Pup 12D™.
    [Show full text]
  • “USC Engineering and I Grew up Together,” Viterbi Likes to Say
    Published by the University of Southern California Volume 2 Issue 2 Let There Be Light A Revolution in BioMed Imaging Small and Deadly A Proper Name Searching for Air A Proper Name Pollution Solutions Viterbis Name School of Engineering Digital Reunion Reuniting the Parthenon and its Art Spring/Summer 2004 One man’s algorithm changed the way the world communicates. One couple’s generosity has the potential to do even more. Andrew J. Viterbi: Presenting The University of Southern California’s • Inventor of the Viterbi Algorithm, the basis of Andrew and Erna Viterbi School of Engineering. all of today’s cell phone communications • The co-founder of Qualcomm • Co-developer of CDMA cell phone technology More than 40 years ago, we believed in Andrew Viterbi and granted him a Ph.D. • Member of the National Academy of Engineering, the National Academy of Sciences and the Today, he clearly believes in us. He and his wife of nearly 45 years have offered American Academy of Arts and Sciences • Recipient of the Shannon Award, the Marconi Foundation Award, the Christopher Columbus us their name and the largest naming gift for any school of engineering in the country. With the Award and the IEEE Alexander Graham Bell Medal • USC Engineering Alumnus, Ph.D., 1962 invention of the Viterbi Algorithm, Andrew J. Viterbi made it possible for hundreds of millions of The USC Viterbi School of Engineering: • Ranked #8 in the country (#4 among private cell phone users to communicate simultaneously, without interference. With this generous gift, he universities) by U.S. News & World Report • Faculty includes 23 members of the National further elevates the status of this proud institution, known from this day forward as USC‘s Andrew Academy of Engineering, three winners of the Shannon Award and one co-winner of the 2003 Turing Award and Erna Viterbi School of Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technologies That Could Prevent More Mysteries Like That of Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 Page 20
    July-August 2014 The technologies that could prevent more mysteries like that of missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 Page 20 Hypersonics after WaveRider p.10 40 tons on a dime at Mars p. 36 A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS AIAA Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics AIAA’s popular book series Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics features books that present a particular, well- defi ned subject refl ecting advances in the fi elds of aerospace science, engineering, and/or technology. POPULAR TITLES Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, Sixth Edition Paul Zarchan 1026 pages This best-selling title provides an in-depth look at tactical and strategic missile guidance using common language, notation, and perspective. The sixth edition includes six new chapters on topics related to improving missile guidance system performance and understanding key design concepts and tradeoffs. ISBN: 978-1-60086-894-8 List Price: $134.95 “AIAA Best Seller” AIAA Member Price: $104.95 Morphing Aerospace Vehicles and Structures John Valasek 286 pages Morphing Aerospace Vehicles and Structures is a synthesis of the relevant disciplines and applications involved in the morphing of fi xed wing fl ight vehicles. The book is organized into three major sections: Bio-Inspiration; Control and Dynamics; and Smart Materials and Structures. Most chapters are both tutorial and research-oriented in nature, covering elementary concepts through advanced – and in many cases novel – methodologies. ISBN: 978-1-60086-903-7 “Features the
    [Show full text]
  • Thirty-Five Years in Power for America
    R O C K E T D Y Thirty-Five Years in Power for America Rochb,JOH -AL hternaund 4@ocae¢dgne Divis!o n ~PaosRExa; For more Ham a ienemfani, Rockeidync has been ont then, where t/te net iou i s must color(I I I nud intense . As ill,, natim i /ills u « nn°d inl apace, pna°r 1,q Rm 1, 1,1 ync has Dorn a key rlemru f` ,,fill esua"s shny,roilh/' ;fOu/nm/sear idreliabilitu/ urunatcln'd bymnlal/rerrudcrli'ii necumpmutin t/c:maldd. AndOilhI/in( has been thegrnzoth of Rnrketdlpu info a murlel-c/mss loader hr directed enlryy technology, spare-horse puroer sgsteurs and n uc learpmlrr-all a direct rejl eciat I "four pride it l hin" a part of Hie American space, enet'gy and dejolse efforts . Front the rent fires, WI''ii' /ten t/sri' with the best tilenf and oil of the cner ;y roc, nI muslcr, ulillr our ambitions set Otl file must distant stars . Front the uoeninq slur/ 35 years ago, iuc'ire been with the Americml tram drat ta,ardred humankind into space, and in turn, brow ;/lit the 6enl'fits of spare back to Fai lh . Edited by J . Mitchell / Designed by J . Allstott Production by Racketdyne Pub'ications Services Our special appreciatimt to Elm vaurfuez-MOrrtsan of Media 5eroice3 Corporation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for their help in securing marry of the photos that appear in this Wok . We are theeprygrateful . The Early Years Thirty-Five Years The Rocketdyne I started working for many years ago was called the Propulsion Center of MACE (Missile and Control Equipment) of North American Aviation .
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition Story 54 Introduction 2 Who We Were 4 194Os 8 195Os 12
    table of contents Introduction 2 Who We Were 4 194Os 8 195Os 12 196Os 18 197Os 26 198Os 30 199Os 34 2OOOs 38 2O1Os 42 Historical Timeline 46 Acquisition Story 54 Who We Are Now 58 Where We Are Going 64 Vision For The Future 68 1 For nearly a century, innovation and reliability have been the hallmarks of two giant U.S. aerospace icons – Aerojet and Rocketdyne. The companies’ propulsion systems have helped to strengthen national defense, launch astronauts into space, and propel unmanned spacecraft to explore the universe. ➢ Aerojet’s diverse rocket propulsion systems have powered military vehicles for decades – from rocket-assisted takeoff for propeller airplanes during World War II – through today’s powerful intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). The systems helped land men on the moon, and maneuvered spacecraft beyond our solar system. ➢ For years, Rocketdyne engines have played a major role in national defense, beginning with powering the United States’ first ICBM to sending modern military communication satellites into orbit. Rocketdyne’s technology also helped launch manned moon missions, propelled space shuttles, and provided the main power system for the International Space Station (ISS). ➢ In 2013, these two rocket propulsion manufacturers became Aerojet Rocketydne, blending expertise and vision to increase efficiency, lower costs, and better compete in the market. Now, as an industry titan, Aerojet Rocketdyne’s talented, passionate employees collaborate to create even greater innovations that protect America and launch its celestial future. 2011 A Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) interceptor is being developed as part of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency’s sea-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System.
    [Show full text]
  • Cal Poly Magazine, Spring 2000
    EDITOR'S NOTES usic students in the movies had Now, of course, 1984 has come and gone, Mr. Holland and his deferred opus. and 16 years beyond that have passed. I don't M I was blessed with Mr. Higby. know if Mr. Higby is still living. My own On the first day of the semester he entered mother died in 1982, her complicated illness our high school English class cloaked in a teaching me that the future is always black raincoat and wrote his name briskly on ambiguous and it's wise to take it as it comes. the chalkboard. He was dapper and dignified, I learned from Mr. Higby that there is with a closely cropped dark beard. When he truth in any genuinely creative work. As a turned to face us he slipped off his coat and New Century's resolution, I hope once again folded it inside out. The lining was scarlet. to pick up the books that used to serve as Everyone gasped. guides for an uncertain life, and to write my Mr. Higby's coat was a sign that we own fiction. And I hope you will find in this were going to be taken on a series of first Cal Poly Magazine of 2000 some stories wonderful journeys. He was that that will touch your imagination. best of teachers - demanding, fair, In addition to many alumni who are and original. We read The Red Badge supporting the community and the university ofCourage and talked about what war really with their talents and gifts, we are profiling meant.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Designations and Popular Names
    Chapter 1 Aircraft Designations and Popular Names Background on the Evolution of Aircraft Designations Aircraft model designation history is very complex. To fully understand the designations, it is important to know the factors that played a role in developing the different missions that aircraft have been called upon to perform. Technological changes affecting aircraft capabilities have resulted in corresponding changes in the operational capabilities and techniques employed by the aircraft. Prior to WWI, the Navy tried various schemes for designating aircraft. In the early period of naval aviation a system was developed to designate an aircraft’s mission. Different aircraft class designations evolved for the various types of missions performed by naval aircraft. This became known as the Aircraft Class Designation System. Numerous changes have been made to this system since the inception of naval aviation in 1911. While reading this section, various references will be made to the Aircraft Class Designation System, Designation of Aircraft, Model Designation of Naval Aircraft, Aircraft Designation System, and Model Designation of Military Aircraft. All of these references refer to the same system involved in designating aircraft classes. This system is then used to develop the specific designations assigned to each type of aircraft operated by the Navy. The F3F-4, TBF-1, AD-3, PBY-5A, A-4, A-6E, and F/A-18C are all examples of specific types of naval aircraft designations, which were developed from the Aircraft Class Designation System. Aircraft Class Designation System Early Period of Naval Aviation up to 1920 The uncertainties during the early period of naval aviation were reflected by the problems encountered in settling on a functional system for designating naval aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing History Chronology Boeing Red Barn
    Boeing History Chronology Boeing Red Barn PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Boeing History Chronology PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 PRE -1910 1910 Los Angeles International Air Meet Museum of Flight Collection HOME PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1881 Oct. 1 William Edward Boeing is born in Detroit, Michigan. 1892 April 6 Donald Wills Douglas is born in Brooklyn, New York. 1895 May 8 James Howard “Dutch” Kindelberger is born in Wheeling, West Virginia. 1898 Oct. 26 Lloyd Carlton Stearman is born in Wellsford, Kansas. 1899 April 9 James Smith McDonnell is born in Denver, Colorado. 1903 Dec. 17 Wilbur and Orville Wright make the first successful powered, manned flight in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. 1905 Dec. 24 Howard Robard Hughes Jr. is born in Houston, Texas. 1907 Jan. 28 Elrey Borge Jeppesen is born in Lake Charles, Louisiana. HOME PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1910 s Boeing Model 1 B & W seaplane HOME PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1910 January Timber baron William E. Boeing attends the first Los Angeles International Air Meet and develops a passion for aviation. March 10 William Boeing buys yacht customer Edward Heath’s shipyard on the Duwamish River in Seattle. The facility will later become his first airplane factory. 1914 May Donald W. Douglas obtains his Bachelor of Science degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), finishing the four-year course in only two years.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Aviation
    North American Aviation North American Aviation Fate merger Successor Rockwell International Founded 1928 Defunct 1996 Location Industry aerospace Parent General Motors Corporation (1933-1948) North American Aviation was a major US aircraft manufacturer. The company was responsible for a number of historic aircraft, including the T-6 Texan trainer, the P-51 Mustang fighter, the B-25 Mitchell bomber, the F-86 Sabre jet fighter, and the X-15 rocket plane, as well as Apollo Command and Service Module, the second stage of the Saturn V rocket, the Space Shuttle orbiter and the B-1 Lancer. Through a series of mergers and sales, North American Aviation is now part of Boeing. History The North American XB-70 Valkyrie Clement Melville Keys founded North American on December 6, 1928, as a holding company that bought and sold interests in various airlines and aviation-relation companies. However, the Air Mail Act of 1934 forced the breakup of such holding companies. The upshot was that North American became a manufacturing company run by James H. "Dutch" Kindelberger (who had been recruited from Douglas Aircraft Company), although it retained Eastern Air Lines until 1938. 1 General Motors Corporation took a controlling interest in NAA and merged it with its General Aviation division in 1933, but retaining the name North American Aviation. Kindelberger moved the company's operations to southern California, which allowed flying year- round, and decided to focus on training aircraft, on the theory that it would be easier than trying to compete with established companies. Its first planes were the GA-15 observation plane and the GA- 16 trainer, followed by the O-47 and BT-9.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Aviation Science Center, 8437 Fallbrook Avenue
    -)(a. @F&ooQ-od~~ d --./a 9, f If A..tdkr&R-. From: [email protected] Sent: ~ednesda; December 03,2008 4:41 AM To: FOlA Office Subject: FOlA Request RECEIVED FOIA Request Form DEC 0 1 2008 Fullname: Christine L. Rowe Organization: BY OLS Phone: Fax : Email: Descri or the location of the North American Aviation Science Center, 8437 Fallbro e, Canoga Park, California, 91304. The approximate date of this '3 facility was 1963. All records that have to do with site plans, use of nuclear materials, type of researchAver- d ne b Atomics International or North American Aviation or any other company on this property Approximate site dates would be from the 1950s to present. This would include Bunker Ramo,3 Ramo Wooldridge, Martin Marietta, TRW, Atomics International, N.A.A., North American Aviation Science Center,Hughes, Lockheed, boeing, Rockwell International,Raytheon, and any other company that would have a license to use nuclear materials on this site. Another records search is the location of Atomics International, P.O. Box 309,Canoga Park, California 91304. The purpose of this search is to determine what nuclear materials were used on this site that would cause above Background radiation to appear in monitoring wells onsite and offsite. These records will be given to DTSC and CDPH for review if they reveal any nuclear research that has not been available to them. At this time, the records provided to DTSC start at approximately 1969 although we know that there were facilities before that date. Other addresses at this site could include addresses on (22800 -22951) Roscoe Blvd, or Hughes Aricraft, 8400 Fallbrook Ave, Raytheon Missiles Systems, 8433 Fallbrook Ave, 01,8501, 8511, 8521, 8531 Fallbrook Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • X-Planes: X-1 to X-45, by Jay Miller, Midland Counties Publishing, 2001
    AMERICAN X-VEHICLES An Inventory—X-1 to X-50 Centennial of Flight Edition by Dennis R. Jenkins, Tony Landis, and Jay Miller Monographs in Aerospace History No. 31 SP-2003-4531 June 2003 AMERICAN X-VEHICLES An Inventory—X-1 to X-50 Centennial of Flight Edition by Dennis R. Jenkins, Tony Landis, and Jay Miller Monographs in Aerospace History No. 31 SP-2003-4531 June 2003 Suggested Further Reading At the Edge of Space: The X-15 Flight Program, by Milton O. Thompson, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1992. Hypersonic: The Story of the North American X-15, by Dennis R. Jenkins and Tony R. Landis, Specialty Press, 2003. The X-Planes: X-1 to X-45, by Jay Miller, Midland Counties Publishing, 2001. Always Another Dawn: The Story of a Rocket Test Pilot, by Scott Crossfield, The World Publishing Company, 1960 (reprinted by Arno Press in 1971 and again by Ayer Company Publishers in 1999). Hypersonics Before the Shuttle: A Concise History of the X-15, by Dennis R. Jenkins, SP-2000-4518, NASA, 2000. Toward Mach 2: The Douglas D-558 Program, edited by J. D. Hunley, SP-4222, NASA, 1999. Flying Without Wings: NASA Lifting Bodies and the Birth of the Space Shuttle, by Milton O. Thompson and Curtis Peebles, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1999. Front Cover Photo A group picture of Douglas airplanes, taken for a photographic promotion in 1954 at what is now known as the Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base, California. The photo includes the X-3 (in front, Air Force serial number 49-2892) then clockwise D-558-I, XF4D-1 (a Navy jet fighter prototype not flown by the NACA), and the first D-558-II (NACA tail number 143, Navy bureau number 37973), which was flown only once by the NACA.
    [Show full text]