DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix: Design Conditions for Selected Locations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix: Design Conditions for Selected Locations APPENDIX: DESIGNLicensed forCONDITIONS single user. © FOR2009 SELECTEDASHRAE, Inc. LOCATIONS Meaning of acronyms: Lat: Latitude, ° Long: Longitude, ° Elev: Elevation, ft DB: Dry bulb temperature, °F WB: Wet bulb temperature, °F DP: Dew point temperature, °F HR: Humidity ratio, grains of moisture per lb of dry air WS: Wind speed, mph MCWB: Mean coincident wet bulb temperature, °F MCDB: Mean coincident dry bulb temperature, °F HDD and CDD 65: Annual heating and cooling degree-days, base 65°F, °F-day Cooling DB/MCWB Evaporation WB/MCDB Dehumidification DP/HR/MCDB Extreme Heat./Cool. Heating DB Station Lat Long Elev 0.4% 1% 2% 0.4% 1% 0.4% 1% Annual WS Degree-Days 99.6% 99% DB / MCWB DB / MCWB DB / MCWB WB / MCDB WB / MCDB DP / HR / MCDB DP / HR / MCDB 1% 2.5% 5% HDD / CDD 65 United States of America 541 sites, 544 more on CD-ROM Alabama 11 sites, 3 more on CD-ROM AUBURN-OPELIKA APT 32.62N 85.43W 774 23.7 27.7 93.0 73.5 90.7 73.7 89.5 73.6 77.4 87.2 76.5 85.7 74.7 133.9 81.3 73.3 127.4 79.8 17.5 15.2 12.8 2383 1859 BIRMINGHAM MUNICIPAL AP 33.56N 86.75W 630 19.6 24.0 95.0 75.1 92.6 74.9 90.6 74.6 78.5 88.4 77.6 87.6 76.1 139.4 82.8 74.9 133.8 81.9 18.3 16.4 14.5 2693 1948 CAIRNS AAF/OZARK 31.28N 85.72W 299 26.9 30.3 95.4 76.4 93.4 76.1 91.3 75.6 80.3 89.6 79.1 88.3 77.8 146.1 83.7 76.8 141.3 82.8 16.9 14.4 12.5 1767 2415 DOTHAN MUNICIPAL 31.32N 85.45W 322 27.3 31.1 95.3 76.3 93.2 75.7 91.2 75.4 80.1 89.3 78.8 87.9 77.5 144.9 83.4 76.7 140.7 82.6 19.2 17.5 15.5 1727 2481 GADSEN MUNI (AWOS) 33.97N 86.08W 568 18.6 22.1 93.4 74.7 91.2 74.5 89.9 74.3 78.0 88.8 77.0 87.7 74.9 133.4 83.7 73.3 126.5 82.0 16.7 14.2 12.3 3215 1557 HUNTSVILLE INTL/JONES FIELD 34.64N 86.79W 643 17.0 21.6 94.6 75.1 92.2 74.7 90.1 74.2 78.3 88.1 77.4 87.2 75.8 138.1 82.6 74.6 132.8 81.5 21.5 18.9 17.0 3140 1742 MAXWELL AFB/MONTGOM 32.38N 86.37W 174 27.9 31.5 97.2 76.5 95.2 76.6 93.3 76.3 80.5 90.8 79.6 89.9 78.0 146.3 85.0 77.0 141.3 84.2 18.0 15.6 13.1 1813 2598 MOBILE REGIONAL AP 30.69N 88.25W 220 26.9 30.7 93.5 76.7 91.8 76.4 90.3 76.0 80.1 88.4 79.0 87.0 77.9 146.0 83.4 76.9 141.5 82.4 20.6 18.5 16.8 1662 2463 MONTGOMERY DANNELLY FIELD 32.30N 86.39W 203 23.7 27.3 96.2 76.5 94.0 76.1 92.1 75.8 79.7 90.8 78.5 89.2 76.7 140.3 84.4 75.8 135.8 83.3 18.6 16.5 14.3 2143 2282 MUSCLE SHOALS REGIONAL AP 34.75N 87.61W 561 17.8 22.1 95.5 75.4 93.1 75.2 90.9 74.8 78.7 89.1 77.8 88.2 76.0 138.6 82.9 75.0 134.0 82.0 18.7 16.8 14.6 3084 1822 TUSCALOOSA MUNICIPAL AP 33.21N 87.62W 187 20.6 25.0 95.7 76.5 93.4 76.3 91.4 76.0 79.8 90.2 78.7 88.9 77.1 142.2 83.6 75.9 136.5 82.9 17.5 14.8 13.0 2509 2101 Alaska 7 sites, 66 more on CD-ROM FAIRBANKS INTL ARPT 64.82N 147.86W 453 -43.3 -38.1 81.2 60.9 78.0 59.8 74.6 58.5 63.0 76.5 61.5 73.9 58.4 74.2 65.1 56.7 69.6 64.1 17.7 15.5 12.6 13528 71 FT. RICHARDSON/BRYA 61.27N 149.65W 377 -18.6 -12.5 73.9 59.7 70.8 58.2 67.8 56.8 61.1 71.8 59.2 68.7 56.0 67.7 64.2 54.5 64.0 62.1 19.0 14.5 11.5 10726 3 ANCHORAGE/ELMENDORF 61.25N 149.80W 194 -26.0 -23.0 73.7 58.4 71.2 57.5 68.0 56.2 60.5 70.2 59.1 67.5 56.9 69.5 61.6 55.2 65.3 60.6 18.8 15.6 12.8 10360 11 LAKE HOOD SEAPLANE 61.18N 149.96W 131 -22.6 -20.1 74.5 59.8 71.4 58.7 68.2 57.1 61.2 72.0 59.6 68.4 56.8 69.0 62.8 55.3 65.3 62.2 18.7 16.3 13.6 9824 16 ANCHORAGE INTL AP 61.18N 149.99W 131 -22.7 -20.2 71.4 58.7 68.3 57.3 65.9 56.1 60.3 68.9 58.8 66.1 56.4 68.0 62.6 55.2 65.1 61.4 20.7 18.5 16.6 10121 5 ANCHORAGE MERRILL FIELD 61.22N 149.86W 138 -23.9 -21.6 72.9 59.4 70.3 58.1 67.9 56.9 61.2 70.3 59.6 67.5 57.2 70.1 63.0 55.5 65.9 62.0 15.2 12.5 10.8 10079 10 JUNEAU INT'L ARPT 58.36N 134.58W 23 3.8 8.2 73.5 59.8 69.9 58.2 66.5 56.8 61.1 71.3 59.5 67.7 57.3 70.0 62.0 56.0 66.9 60.8 26.6 23.8 19.8 8333 3 Arizona 9 sites, 7 more on CD-ROM CASA GRANDA (AWOS) 32.95N 111.77W 1463 32.0 34.5 108.5 69.2 106.5 68.7 104.4 68.3 73.9 93.1 73.1 93.5 70.1 116.8 79.4 67.9 108.1 79.2 20.3 17.4 14.7 1535 3502 DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB 32.17N 110.88W 2654 32.9 35.7 105.4 65.3 102.5 65.1 100.2 64.7 72.9 85.2 71.9 86.1 70.2 122.8 76.6 68.3 114.7 77.0 19.6 17.2 14.8 1504 3103 FLAGSTAFF AIRPORT 35.13N 111.67W 7005 3.9 9.4 85.5 55.5 83.1 55.2 80.6 54.9 61.1 73.3 59.9 72.7 57.4 91.7 63.5 56.1 87.3 63.1 20.9 18.4 16.3 6912 108 LUKE AFB/PHOENIX 33.53N 112.38W 1086 35.3 37.7 110.8 70.7 108.5 70.6 106.2 70.3 77.4 96.4 76.1 95.7 72.9 127.3 83.8 71.0 118.9 84.4 19.7 17.0 14.3 1245 3923 PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTL AP 33.44N 111.99W 1106 38.6 41.3 110.2 70.0 108.1 69.8 106.2 69.6 76.1 96.4 75.2 95.8 71.3 120.2 82.6 69.8 114.0 84.4 18.3 15.9 12.9 941 4557 PRESCOTT LOVE FIELD 34.65N 112.42W 5052 17.5 20.7 94.3 61.2 91.4 60.6 89.6 60.1 67.1 81.3 65.7 80.1 63.4 105.6 70.9 61.5 98.6 70.4 20.8 18.5 16.7 4245 947 TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AP 32.13N 110.96W 2556 31.7 34.4 105.9 66.2 103.6 66.0 101.3 65.7 72.5 88.9 71.7 88.3 69.0 117.4 76.2 67.8 112.3 76.6 21.4 18.9 16.9 1466 3180 YUMA INTL AIRPORT 32.65N 114.60W 207 41.8 44.7 110.8 73.5 108.6 73.2 106.6 72.7 79.8 96.7 78.5 96.0 75.4 134.3 87.4 73.7 126.5 88.3 20.7 18.3 16.1 680 4662 YUMA MCAS 32.65N 114.62W 213 41.7 44.6 110.9 73.7 108.7 73.2 106.8 72.7 79.8 96.7 78.4 96.0 75.4 134.2 87.1 73.6 126.2 88.2 20.8 18.3 16.3 680 4661 Arkansas 11 sites, 7 more on CD-ROM BENTONVILLE (AWOS) 36.35N 94.22W 1296 10.1 15.9 93.5 74.4 91.2 74.8 89.8 74.2 77.6 89.0 76.4 87.8 73.5 130.6 84.1 72.8 127.8 83.3 19.5 17.4 15.5 4052 1335 FAYETTEVILLE DRAKE FIELD 36.01N 94.17W 1260 8.0 14.6 95.2 75.2 92.7 74.8 90.3 74.3 78.0 89.8 77.0 88.4 74.7 136.1 83.8 73.3 129.9 82.8 20.5 18.7 17.5 3935 1434 FORT SMITH REGIONAL AP 35.33N 94.37W 463 14.7 20.1 99.1 76.4 96.4 76.3 93.8 76.0 79.6 92.4 78.5 90.9 76.3 139.8 84.7 75.3 135.0 83.8 20.4 18.0 16.2 3234 2016 JONESBORO MUNI 35.83N 90.63W 269 12.4 18.5 96.4 77.0 93.5 76.1 91.6 75.7 80.1 91.1 78.9 90.0 77.1 142.6 85.7 75.4 134.6 84.0 20.9 18.7 17.1 3550 1913 LITTLE ROCK ADAMS FIELD 34.75N 92.23W 256 17.2 22.3 98.0 77.2 95.3 77.2 93.0 76.6 80.2 91.7 79.2 90.6 77.2 143.0 85.4 76.3 138.4 84.4 18.6 16.7 15.1 2976 2124 LITTLE ROCK AFB 34.92N 92.15W 338 15.3 20.4 99.3 77.3 96.3 77.5 93.3 77.0 81.1 91.1 80.0 90.3 78.9 152.1 85.1 77.3 143.8 84.4 17.6 15.0 12.9 3168 2035 LITTLE ROCK/ADAMS F 34.83N 92.25W 1152 16.4 21.9 95.2 76.4 92.8 76.1 90.8 75.4 78.9 89.9 77.8 88.6 75.8 140.7 84.3 74.9 136.4 83.6 18.4 16.5 14.7 3226 1909 PINE BLUFF FAA AP 34.18N 91.94W 213 21.1 25.3 97.1 77.5 94.9 77.5 92.9 76.9 80.4 91.8 79.4 91.1 77.3 143.0 85.9 76.2 138.0 85.1 18.5 16.8 15.0 2655 2236 ROGERS (AWOS) 36.37N 94.10W 1362 10.0 15.8 93.4 72.8 91.0 73.3 89.1 72.8 76.3 87.5 75.4 86.3 72.9 128.2 82.3 72.2 125.4 81.8 20.8 18.6 16.6 4061 1354 SILOAM SPRING(AWOS) 36.18N 94.48W 1194 10.3 16.1 95.5 74.1 92.6 74.0 90.3 73.7 76.9 89.4 76.0 88.1 72.9 127.8 84.3 72.3 124.9 83.7 22.8 19.9 17.9 3994 1420 TEXARKANA WEBB FIELD 33.45N 94.01W 400 21.6 26.3 98.5 76.3 96.0 76.3 93.5 76.1 79.7 91.2 78.9 90.2 76.8 141.9 84.8 75.8 136.8 84.0 18.8 17.0 14.9 2431 2349 California 56 sites, 17 more on CD-ROM ALAMEDA NAS 37.73N 122.32W 13 40.3 42.3 83.4 65.0 79.4 63.6 75.8 62.6 66.7 79.1 65.3 76.4 62.5 84.5 69.2 61.1 80.6 68.3 20.6 18.4 16.7 2158 226 BAKERSFIELD MEADOWS FIELD 35.43N 119.06W 492 32.2 34.8 103.1 71.1 100.7 70.2 98.2 69.2 73.9 97.2 72.3 95.5 66.1 97.8 86.6 63.4 89.1 85.6 18.2 15.8 13.2 2134 2236 BEALE AFB/MARYSVILE 39.13N 121.43W 125 32.1 34.6 100.7 70.6 98.0 69.3 95.1 68.2 73.1 96.2 71.3 93.6 64.6 91.5 82.9 63.1 86.8 80.5 21.4 18.3 15.6 2420 1519 BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASSADENA AP 34.20N 118.36W 732 39.0 41.5 98.3 68.8 94.6 68.3 91.3 67.4 73.4 90.4 71.7 88.2 68.0 105.8 79.4 66.3 99.4 77.5 18.4 15.2 12.9 1298 1486 CAMARILLO (AWOS) 34.22N 119.08W 75 37.3 39.4 84.6 62.8 81.6 63.8 79.2 63.9 69.3 78.6 68.1 77.1 65.8 95.6 74.7 64.1 89.8 72.1 24.9 19.9 16.2 1855 362 CAMP PENDLETON MCAS 33.30N 117.35W 79 32.8 35.6 92.0 66.9 87.9 66.2 84.2 65.6 71.8 83.7 70.4 82.1 68.0 103.1 76.8 66.1 96.5 76.1 16.9 14.6 12.7 1673 723 CARLSBAD/PALOMAR 33.13N 117.28W 328 43.0 44.9 81.7 64.5 79.3 64.3 75.4 64.5 70.3 76.6 68.8 75.0 67.8 103.5 74.1 66.1 97.5 72.6 14.1 12.3 10.9 1747 434 CASTLE AFB/MERCED 37.38N 120.57W 197 30.6 32.5 99.5 70.1 97.1 69.3 94.4 68.3 72.3 94.9 70.9 93.3 63.7 89.0 84.3 61.9 83.3 83.9 18.2 14.8 12.6 2629 1474 EL TORO MCAS 33.68N 117.73W 384 40.3 43.1 92.1 68.1 88.6 67.5 85.6 66.6 71.9 86.1 70.5 83.9 67.0 100.7 78.4 65.5 95.4 77.3 14.4 11.7 10.2 1217 1070 FRESNO YOSEMITE INTL AP 36.78N 119.72W 328 31.5 33.7 103.6 71.2 101.1 70.0 98.6 69.0 73.7 98.0 72.2 95.8 65.6 95.8 85.1 63.4 88.6 85.1 18.1 16.3 14.2 2301 2082 FULLERTON MUNICIPAL 33.87N 117.98W 95 39.2 42.8 92.7 68.5 90.1 67.7 87.5 68.2 72.8 86.8 71.4 84.2 68.3 104.3 79.6 66.2 96.9 78.5 13.4 11.3 10.4 1246 1179 GEORGE AFB 34.58N 117.38W 2874 27.6 30.5 100.7 65.3 98.4 64.7 96.0 63.9 69.8 88.4 68.4 88.2 64.5 101.2 76.9 61.9 92.1 78.6 22.7 18.9 16.7 2661 1911 HAYWARD AIR TERM 37.66N 122.12W 46 37.1 39.2 87.6 66.2 82.3 64.8 78.6 63.5 68.3 82.5 66.4 79.4 63.0 86.2 75.3 61.2 80.8 71.2 19.8 17.9 16.3 2531 286 Licensed for single user.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CLIMATIC DESIGN INFORMATION Climatic Design Conditions
    CHAPTER 14 CLIMATIC DESIGN INFORMATION Climatic Design Conditions..................................................... 14.1 Generating Design-Day Data ................................................ 14.11 Monthly Design Conditions ..................................................... 14.3 Estimation of Degree-Days .................................................... 14.11 CALCULATING CLEAR-SKY SOLAR RADIATION ............... 14.7 Representativeness of Data and Sources of Uncertainty ....... 14.12 TRANSPOSITION TO RECEIVING SURFACES Other Sources of Climatic Information.................................. 14.15 OF VARIOUS ORIENTATIONS ........................................... 14.9 Appendix: Design Conditions for Selected Locations............ 14.18 HIS chapter and the data on the accompanying CD-ROM pro- chapter. The tables also list heating and cooling degree-days for Tvide the climatic design information for 5564 locations in the bases 65 and 50°F, as well as cooling degree-hours for bases 74 and United States, Canada, and around the world. This is an increase of 80°F. The calculation of daily dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperature 1142 stations from the 2005 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals. profiles, which are useful for generating 24 h weather data sequences The large number of stations, along with the addition of several new suitable as input to many HVAC analysis methods, has been signifi- table elements, made printing the whole tables impractical. Conse- cantly updated, with the inclusion of mean dry-bulb and wet-bulb quently, the complete table of design conditions for only Atlanta, GA, temperature ranges coincident with the 5% monthly dry-bulb and appears in this printed chapter to illustrate the table format. However, wet-bulb design temperatures. a subset of the table elements most often used is presented in the Finally, clear-sky solar radiation calculations have been moved Appendix at the end of this chapter for selected stations representing to this chapter from other chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimations of Undisturbed Ground Temperatures Using Numerical and Analytical Modeling
    ESTIMATIONS OF UNDISTURBED GROUND TEMPERATURES USING NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL MODELING By LU XING Bachelor of Arts/Science in Mechanical Engineering Huazhong University of Science & Technology Wuhan, China 2008 Master of Arts/Science in Mechanical Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK, US 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 2014 ESTIMATIONS OF UNDISTURBED GROUND TEMPERATURES USING NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL MODELING Dissertation Approved: Dr. Jeffrey D. Spitler Dissertation Adviser Dr. Daniel E. Fisher Dr. Afshin J. Ghajar Dr. Richard A. Beier ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jeffrey D. Spitler, who patiently guided me through the hard times and encouraged me to continue in every stage of this study until it was completed. I greatly appreciate all his efforts in making me a more qualified PhD, an independent researcher, a stronger and better person. Also, I would like to devote my sincere thanks to my parents, Hongda Xing and Chune Mei, who have been with me all the time. Their endless support, unconditional love and patience are the biggest reason for all the successes in my life. To all my good friends, colleagues in the US and in China, who talked to me and were with me during the difficult times. I would like to give many thanks to my committee members, Dr. Daniel E. Fisher, Dr. Afshin J. Ghajar and Dr. Richard A. Beier for their suggestions which helped me to improve my research and dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Exploitation Plan
    D9.10 – Final Exploitation Plan Jorge Lpez (Atos), Alessandra Tedeschi (DBL), Julian Williams (UDUR), abio Massacci (UNITN), Raminder Ruprai (NGRID), Andreas Schmitz ( raunhofer), Emilio Lpez (URJC), Michael Pellot (TMB), Zden,a Mansfeldov. (ISASCR), Jan J/r0ens ( raunhofer) Pending of approval from the Research Executive Agency - EC Document Number D1.10 Document Title inal e5ploitation plan Version 1.0 Status inal Work Packa e WP 1 Deliverable Type Report Contractual Date of Delivery 31 .01 .20 18 Actual Date of Delivery 31.01.2018 Responsible Unit ATOS Contributors ISASCR, UNIDUR, UNITN, NGRID, DBL, URJC, raunhofer, TMB (eyword List E5ploitation, ramewor,, Preliminary, Requirements, Policy papers, Models, Methodologies, Templates, Tools, Individual plans, IPR Dissemination level PU SECONO.ICS Consortium SECONOMICS ?Socio-Economics meets SecurityA (Contract No. 28C223) is a Collaborative pro0ect) within the 7th ramewor, Programme, theme SEC-2011.E.8-1 SEC-2011.7.C-2 ICT. The consortium members are: UniversitG Degli Studi di Trento (UNITN) Pro0ect Manager: prof. abio Massacci 1 38100 Trento, Italy abio.MassacciHunitn.it www.unitn.it DEEP BLUE Srl (DBL) Contact: Alessandra Tedeschi 2 00113 Roma, Italy Alessandra.tedeschiHdblue.it www.dblue.it raunhofer -Gesellschaft zur Irderung der angewandten Contact: Prof. Jan J/r0ens 3 orschung e.V., Hansastr. 27c, 0an.0uer0ensHisst.fraunhofer.de 80E8E Munich, Germany http://www.fraunhofer.de/ UNIVERSIDAD REL JUAN CARLOS, Contact: Prof. David Rios Insua 8 Calle TulipanS/N, 28133, Mostoles david.riosHur0c.es
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Annual Report 2019 ALARKO HOLDİNG A.Ş. CONTENTS 4 ALARKO GROUP OF COMPANIES 63 EARNINGS FROM SUBSIDIARIES AND EQUITY PARTICIPATIONS 6 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN 64 BUSINESS VOLUME AND 8 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERSPECTIVES FOR 2020 DIRECTORS AND AUDITORS OF ALARKO HOLDING A.Ş. 65 TAXES PAID AND PERSONNEL EXPENSES 10 GENERAL ORGANIZATION 66 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAST 12 MANAGEMENT STAFF FIVE YEARS 14 FINANCIAL INDICATORS 67 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING OUR ACTIVITIES 16 MILESTONES OF 65 YEARS 76 PROPOSAL FOR DIVIDEND 20 AGENDA OF THE ORDINARY DISTRIBUTION GENERAL ASSEMBLY 77 DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE 21 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD WITH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF DIRECTORS PRINCIPLES 23 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE ALARKO 77 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GROUP COMPLIANCE REPORT 24 CONTRACTING GROUP 84 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INFORMATION FORM 34 ENERGY GROUP 90 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 42 INDUSTRY AND TRADE GROUP ON THE ANNUAL REPORT 50 TOURISM GROUP 92 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR 56 LAND DEVELOPMENT GROUP ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019 WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 60 İSHAK ALATON’S VIEW 93 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 61 DR. ÜZEYİR GARİH’S VIEW 98 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL 62 CAPITALS AND PERCENTAGES OF STATEMENTS SHAREHOLDINGS IN SUBSIDIARIES AND PARTICIPATIONS 196 CONCLUSION 14.07.2020 FISCAL YEAR 2019 GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING REGISTERED CAPITAL TL 500,000,000 ISSUED CAPITAL TL 435,000,000 1 ALARKO HOLDİNG A.Ş. Annual Report 2019 2 Annual Report 2019 ALARKO HOLDİNG A.Ş. The success line of a long-term business is shaped at the outset. Planning is the first driver of success. Poor planning is a guarantee of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Trams Der Welt / Trams of the World 2021 Daten / Data © 2021 Peter Sohns Seite / Page 1
    www.blickpunktstrab.net – Trams der Welt / Trams of the World 2021 Daten / Data © 2021 Peter Sohns Seite / Page 1 Algeria ... Alger (Algier) ... Metro ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Alger (Algier) ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Constantine ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Oran ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Ouragla ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Sétif ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Sidi Bel Abbès ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF ... Metro ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Caballito ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Lacroze (General Urquiza) ... Interurban (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Premetro E ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Tren de la Costa ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Córdoba, Córdoba ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Mar del Plata, BA ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 900 mm Argentina ... Mendoza, Mendoza ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Mendoza, Mendoza ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Rosario, Santa Fé ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Rosario, Santa Fé ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Valle Hermoso, Córdoba ... Tram-Museum (Electric) ... 600 mm Armenia ... Yerevan ... Metro ... 1524 mm Armenia ... Yerevan ... Trolleybus Australia ... Adelaide, SA - Glenelg ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Australia ... Ballarat, VIC ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Australia ... Bendigo, VIC ... Heritage-Tram
    [Show full text]
  • TCDD Demiryolu Sektör Raporu
    TCDD İŞLETMESİ GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ DEMİRYOLU SEKTÖR RAPORU 2016 Strateji Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı Mayıs, 2017 DEMİRYOLU SEKTÖR RAPORU 2016 İÇİNDEKİLER KISALTMALAR TABLOSU .................................................................................................... 4 BİRİMLER TABLOSU ............................................................................................................. 5 Giriş ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Dünyada Demiryollarının Durumu .................................................................................... 6 1.1. Avrupa Ulaştırma Politikalarında Demiryolları ......................................................... 7 1.2. AB’de Ulaşım Koridorları ve Gelişmeler ................................................................ 16 1.2.1. Pan-Avrupa 4. Koridoru ..................................................................................... 16 1.2.2. Pan-Avrupa 10. Koridoru ................................................................................... 17 1.2.3. Birleşmiş Milletler Koridorları ........................................................................... 17 1.2.4. Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği Örgütü ................................................................ 18 1.2.5. Avrupa – Kafkasya – Asya Ulaştırma Koridoru (TRACECA) .......................... 19 1.3. Dünyada Demiryolu Sektöründe Ar-Ge Faaliyetleri ............................................... 19 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Focalesn7 GB Mise En Page 1 30/07/12 14:49 Page1
    CouvFocalesN7_GB_Mise en page 1 30/07/12 14:49 Page1 [ July 2012 ] Decentralisation in Turkey Since 2004, the government of Turkey has undertaken a number of “decentralisation” reforms. A number of laws have been passed that give increased autonomy and resources to regional and local authorities and aim to reorganise the division of tasks and the relationships between these 07 authorities and the central government. These reforms represent substantial change, since there had previously been practically no intermediate level between the central government and the citizens, and the decision-making centres in Ankara constituted serious bottlenecks that were regularly circumvented. The reform process raises a number of questions. What rationales led to the implementation of these reforms? Did the reforms result from the opening of negotiations on Turkey’s accession to the European Union, in 2005, or were domestic political processes also a factor? What real changes did these reforms introduce? What impact have they had on adjustments in the levels of government and the connections among them, and, more generally, on the Turkish political July 2012 scene? Decentralisation in Turkey AUTHORS Ulaş BAYRAKTAR Mersin University, Turkey Élise MASSICARD Institut français d’études anatoliennes (IFEA), Istanbul CONTACT AUTHORS Réjane HUGOUNENQ Ulaş BAYRAKTAR Research Department, AFD [email protected] Mersin University, Turkey Élise MASSICARD Decentralisation in Turkey Decentralisation Institut français d’études anatoliennes (IFEA), Istanbul 07 FocalesN7_GB_Mise
    [Show full text]
  • Global Evaluation of Biofuel Potential from Microalgae
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2014 Global Evaluation of Biofuel Potential from Microalgae Jeffrey W. Moody Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Moody, Jeffrey W., "Global Evaluation of Biofuel Potential from Microalgae" (2014). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 2070. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2070 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLOBAL EVALUATION OF BIOFUEL POTENTIAL FROM MICROALGAE by Jeffrey W. Moody A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Mechanical Engineering Approved: Dr. Jason Quinn Dr. Byard Wood Major Professor Committee Member Dr. Rees Fullmer Dr. Mark McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2014 ii Copyright © Jeffrey Moody 2014 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Global Evaluation of Biofuel Potential from Microalgae by Jeffrey W. Moody, Master of Science Utah State University, 2014 Major Professor: Dr. Jason C. Quinn Department: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Traditional terrestrial crops are currently being utilized as a feedstock for biofuels but resource requirements and low yields limit the sustainability and scalability. Comparatively, next generation feedstocks, such as microalgae, have inherent advantages such as higher solar energy efficiencies, larger lipid fractions, utilization of waste carbon dioxide, and cultivation on poor quality land.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent İçi Raylı Toplu Taşıma Sistemleri İncelemesi Ve Dünya Örnekleri İle
    i ULAŞTIRMA, DENİZCİLİK VE HABERLEŞME BAKANLIĞI KENT İÇİ RAYLI TOPLU TAŞIMA SİSTEMLERİ İNCELEMESİ VE DÜNYA ÖRNEKLERİ İLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Göktuğ BAŞTÜRK Ulaştırma ve Haberleşme Uzmanlığı Tezi Eylül 2014 Ankara ii iii ULAŞTIRMA, DENİZCİLİK VE HABERLEŞME BAKANLIĞI KENT İÇİ RAYLI TOPLU TAŞIMA SİSTEMLERİ İNCELEMESİ VE DÜNYA ÖRNEKLERİ İLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Göktuğ BAŞTÜRK Ulaştırma ve Haberleşme Uzmanlığı Tezi Eylül 2014 Ankara i KABUL VE ONAY Göktuğ BAŞTÜRK tarafından hazırlanan Kent İçi Raylı Toplu Taşıma Sistemleri İncelemesi ve Dünya Örnekleri ile Karşılaştırılması adlı bu tezin Ulaştırma ve Haberleşme Uzmanlığı tezi olarak uygun olduğunu onaylarım. Genel Müdür Yardımcısı Yalçın EYİGÜN Tez Danışmanı Bu çalışma, tez savunma komisyonumuz tarafından Ulaştırma ve Haberleşme Uzmanlığı Tezi olarak kabul edilmiştir. Adı ve Soyadı İmzası Başkan : Üye : Üye : Üye : Üye : Bu tez, Ulaştırma, Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı tez yazım kurallarına uygundur. ii İÇİNDEKİLER KABUL VE ONAY ...................................................................................................... i İÇİNDEKİLER ............................................................................................................ ii ÖZET............................................................................................................................ v ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ vi TEŞEKKÜR ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rayli Ulaşim Sistemleri Sektör Analizi
    2018 RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ SEKTÖR ANALİZİ 2018 DR. İLHAMİ PEKTAŞ 22.07.2019 RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ SEKTÖR ANALİZİ 2018 İÇİNDEKİLER TABLOLAR LİSTESİ ............................................................................................................................................ 4 ŞEKİLLER LİSTESİ ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1. GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2. DÜNYADA RAYLI SİSTEMLER SEKTÖRÜ ......................................................................................................... 8 2.1. Dünya Raylı Sistemler Pazarı ve Yatırımlar ............................................................................................ 8 2.2. Raylı Sistemler Sektörü (Yolcu) ............................................................................................................ 15 2.3. Raylı Sistemler Sektörü (Yük) .............................................................................................................. 19 3. TÜRKİYE’DE RAYLI SİSTEMLER SEKTÖRÜ ..................................................................................................... 21 3.1. Osmanlı Döneminde Demiryolu ( 1856-1923) ...................................................................................... 22 3.2. Cumhuriyet Döneminde Demiryolu (1923-1950) ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monorail: an Alternative Transportation Mode for Metu
    MONORAIL: AN ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION MODE FOR METU A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ALEV GÖKBULUT IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2003 Approval of the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Prof. Dr. Canan ÖZGEN Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the Degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Selahattin ÖMÜR Head of the Department This is to certify that we read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayen SAVA Supervisor Examining Committee Members Instructor lhan KURAL Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ali hsan ÜNAY Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayen SAVA Assist. Prof. Dr. Güven Arif SARGIN Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela BABALIK ABSTRACT MONORAIL: AN ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION MODE FOR METU Gökbulut, Alev M.S., Architecture Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayen Sava September 2003, 175 pages The aim of this thesis is to investigate an alternative mode of transportation for METU and the impacts of spatial transformations generated by the proposed system in an architectural context. This study embraces modern concepts of space-time in the practice of architectural design, and involves a sensitive consideration of the perception of space relative to position, speed and movement. In an urban context, the thesis unfolds spatial transformations affected by new movement technology. While the notions of movement and speed fundamentally shape the image of the contemporary city, METU campus will be reanalyzed within this framework.
    [Show full text]
  • City Report Adana, Turkey
    CREATE - City Report Adana, Turkey Past, Present and Future mobility challenges and opportunities in Adana 01-11-2017 By Clemence Cavoli, UCL Centre for Transport Studies Contributions from and Reviewed by Zekiye Beyarslan, Filiz Ünlü Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................2 II. Context & Methods ............................................................................................................................................2 III. Adana Monograph ..........................................................................................................................................3 Understanding the past ..........................................................................................................................................3 How have urban transport and urban transport policies evolved over the past 10 to 15 years? .........................3 How have urban transport policies evolved over the past 10 to 15 years? .........................................................8 Defining the present ............................................................................................................................................ 10 What are the biggest challenges for urban transport and mobility in Adana? ................................................. 14 What are the current policy priorities for urban transport in the city? ...........................................................
    [Show full text]