Rayli Sistemler Sektör Analizi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rayli Sistemler Sektör Analizi 2017 RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ SEKTÖR ANALİZİ 2017 DR. İLHAMİ PEKTAŞ ANADOLU RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ KÜMELENMESİ RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ SEKTÖR ANALİZİ 2017 İÇİNDEKİLER 1. GİRİŞ ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. DÜNYADA RAYLI SİSTEMLER SEKTÖRÜ ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.1. Dünya Raylı Sistemler Pazarı ve Yatırımlar ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Raylı Sistemler Sektörü (Yolcu) ........................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Raylı Sistemler Sektörü (Yük) .............................................................................................................................................. 14 3. TÜRKİYE’DE RAYLI SİSTEMLER SEKTÖRÜ ...................................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Osmanlı Döneminde Demiryolu ( 1856-1923) ................................................................................................................. 18 3.2. Cumhuriyet Döneminde Demiryolu (1923-1950) ........................................................................................................... 18 3.3. 1950-2002 Döneminde Demiryolu.................................................................................................................................... 19 3.4. 2002-2017 Döneminde Demiryolu................................................................................................................................... 20 3.4.1. 2012-2017 Dönemi Biten ve Devam Eden Projeler ................................................................................................. 23 2.4.1.1. Tamamlanan ve Devam eden Önemli Projeler ............................................................................................... 23 2.4.1.2. Tamamlanan Yüksek Hızlı Tren Hatları ......................................................................................................... 23 3.4.2. Sinyalizasyon Ve Elektrifikasyon Yapım Projeleri ................................................................................................ 26 3.5. Türkiye’de Şehir içi Raylı Sistemler Sektörü ...................................................................................................................... 27 3.5.1. İstanbul Metro (1987-2030) ................................................................................................................................................ 28 3.5.2. Ankara Metrosu (1990-2018) ............................................................................................................................................. 32 3.5.3. İzmir Metrosu (1990-2017)................................................................................................................................................. 33 3.5.4. Bursa Metrosu (1998-2016) ............................................................................................................................................... 34 3.5.5. Adana Metrosu (1998-2016) .............................................................................................................................................. 35 3.5.6. Eskişehir Raylı Sistem Hattı .............................................................................................................................................. 36 3.5.7. Kayseri Raylı Sistem Hattı ................................................................................................................................................. 37 3.5.8. Gaziantep Raylı Sistem Hattı ............................................................................................................................................. 37 3.5.9. Samsun Raylı Sistem Hattı ................................................................................................................................................. 38 3.5.10. Antalya Raylı Sistem Hattı ............................................................................................................................................... 39 3.5.11. Konya Raylı Sistem Hattı ................................................................................................................................................. 40 3.5.12. Kocaeli Raylı Sistem Hattı ............................................................................................................................................... 40 3.5.13. Raylı Sistemlerde yolculuk oranları ................................................................................................................................ 41 3.5.14. Raylı Sistem Planlanan Diğer Şehirlerimiz..................................................................................................................... 41 3.5.14.1. Mersin Raylı Sistem Hattı ........................................................................................................................................ 41 3.5.14.2. Diyarbakır Raylı Sistem Hattı ................................................................................................................................. 42 3.5.6. Yerel Yönetim İşbirliği İle Yapılan Raylı Toplu Taşıma Projeleri ................................................................................. 42 3.5.6.1. Marmaray ................................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.5.6.2. Başkent Ray ................................................................................................................................................................ 43 3.5.6.3. Gazi Ray ...................................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.5.6.4. Egeray / İzban ............................................................................................................................................................. 44 3.5.6.5. Adapazarı .................................................................................................................................................................... 44 3.5.6.6. Balray / Balıkesir ....................................................................................................................................................... 44 4. TÜRKİYEDE RAYLI SİSTEMLERDE ARAÇLAR VE MENŞEİ .......................................................................................... 45 4.1. Demiryollarında Çeken-Çekilen Araçlar ............................................................................................................................. 45 4.2. Şehir İçi Raylı Sistemlerde Araçlar ...................................................................................................................................... 46 4.2.1. İstanbul Metro ve Tramvay Hatlarında Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei .............................................................. 46 4.2.2. Ankara Metro Hatlarında Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei..................................................................................... 47 1 RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ SEKTÖR ANALİZİ 2017 4.3.3. Bursa Metro ve Tramvay Hatlarında Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei .................................................................. 47 4.3.4. İzmir Metro ve Banliyö Hatlarında Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei ..................................................................... 47 4.3.5. Diğer Şehirlerimizde Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei ............................................................................................. 47 4.3.6. Raylı Sistem Planlaması Yapılan Şehirlerimiz ............................................................................................................ 48 5. MİLLİ PROJELER .................................................................................................................................................................. 48 5.1. Milli Tren Projeleri Genel Bakış ..................................................................................................................................... 48 5.2. Türkiye’deki Ar-Ge Projeleri .......................................................................................................................................... 51 5.2.1. Milli Tren Geliştirme Projesi ................................................................................................................................... 51 5.2.2. Tüvasaş Milli Emu Tren Seti Geliştirme Projesi .................................................................................................... 51 5.2.3. Tülomsaş YHT Seti Geliştirme Projesi ................................................................................................................... 51 5.2.4. Anahat Lokomotif Temini ....................................................................................................................................... 51 5.2.5. Elektrikli (EMU) Ve Dizel Tren Seti (DMU) Temini ............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • CLIMATIC DESIGN INFORMATION Climatic Design Conditions
    CHAPTER 14 CLIMATIC DESIGN INFORMATION Climatic Design Conditions..................................................... 14.1 Generating Design-Day Data ................................................ 14.11 Monthly Design Conditions ..................................................... 14.3 Estimation of Degree-Days .................................................... 14.11 CALCULATING CLEAR-SKY SOLAR RADIATION ............... 14.7 Representativeness of Data and Sources of Uncertainty ....... 14.12 TRANSPOSITION TO RECEIVING SURFACES Other Sources of Climatic Information.................................. 14.15 OF VARIOUS ORIENTATIONS ........................................... 14.9 Appendix: Design Conditions for Selected Locations............ 14.18 HIS chapter and the data on the accompanying CD-ROM pro- chapter. The tables also list heating and cooling degree-days for Tvide the climatic design information for 5564 locations in the bases 65 and 50°F, as well as cooling degree-hours for bases 74 and United States, Canada, and around the world. This is an increase of 80°F. The calculation of daily dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperature 1142 stations from the 2005 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals. profiles, which are useful for generating 24 h weather data sequences The large number of stations, along with the addition of several new suitable as input to many HVAC analysis methods, has been signifi- table elements, made printing the whole tables impractical. Conse- cantly updated, with the inclusion of mean dry-bulb and wet-bulb quently, the complete table of design conditions for only Atlanta, GA, temperature ranges coincident with the 5% monthly dry-bulb and appears in this printed chapter to illustrate the table format. However, wet-bulb design temperatures. a subset of the table elements most often used is presented in the Finally, clear-sky solar radiation calculations have been moved Appendix at the end of this chapter for selected stations representing to this chapter from other chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimations of Undisturbed Ground Temperatures Using Numerical and Analytical Modeling
    ESTIMATIONS OF UNDISTURBED GROUND TEMPERATURES USING NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL MODELING By LU XING Bachelor of Arts/Science in Mechanical Engineering Huazhong University of Science & Technology Wuhan, China 2008 Master of Arts/Science in Mechanical Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK, US 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 2014 ESTIMATIONS OF UNDISTURBED GROUND TEMPERATURES USING NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL MODELING Dissertation Approved: Dr. Jeffrey D. Spitler Dissertation Adviser Dr. Daniel E. Fisher Dr. Afshin J. Ghajar Dr. Richard A. Beier ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jeffrey D. Spitler, who patiently guided me through the hard times and encouraged me to continue in every stage of this study until it was completed. I greatly appreciate all his efforts in making me a more qualified PhD, an independent researcher, a stronger and better person. Also, I would like to devote my sincere thanks to my parents, Hongda Xing and Chune Mei, who have been with me all the time. Their endless support, unconditional love and patience are the biggest reason for all the successes in my life. To all my good friends, colleagues in the US and in China, who talked to me and were with me during the difficult times. I would like to give many thanks to my committee members, Dr. Daniel E. Fisher, Dr. Afshin J. Ghajar and Dr. Richard A. Beier for their suggestions which helped me to improve my research and dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Hizli Rayli Sistemlerin Yolcu Taşima Kapasite Hesaplamalari Ve Türkiyedeki Benzer Sistemlerin Birbirleriyle Karşilaştirilmasi
    HIZLI RAYLI SİSTEMLERİN YOLCU TAŞIMA KAPASİTE HESAPLAMALARI VE TÜRKİYEDEKİ BENZER SİSTEMLERİN BİRBİRLERİYLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Ilgaz CANDEMİR_ , Serhan TANYEL_ SUMMARY Rail transit systems are found to be the most trusted transit systems all over the world. They have become one of the main parts of daily urban life as they provide, fast, safe and comfortable journey for passengers. If they are planned precisely, capacities up to10000-40000 passengers/hour can be achieved. They are also used as an important tool for to maintain well developed cities and provide dynamic city centers. In this study, some of the most important rail transit systems in Turkey are introduced. Their capacities tried to be determined by using different capacity calculation methods and the results are tired to be compared. ÖZET Dünyada halen en güvenilir ulaşõm modu, raylõ sistemlerdir. Gelişen teknolojinin yansõmasõ ile birlikte hõz, sinyalizasyon ve konfor problemlerini çözen kentsel raylõ sistemler büyük şehirler için vazgeçilmez olmuşlardõr. Planlama ,dizayn,araç ve ekipman seçimi, inşaat ve sonrasõnda çok titiz bir işletim isteyen metro hatlarõ ortalama 10000-40000 yolcu/saat kapasiteleri olan güçlü toplu taşõmacõlõk sistemlerdir. Raylõ sistemler ayrõca kentin homojen olarak gelişmesinin sağlanmasõnda önemli bir araç olarak görülmekte ve dinamik kent merkezlerinin oluşturulmasõnda etken olmaktadõrlar. Bu bildiride Türkiye’deki raylõ sistemleri hakkõnda kõsaca bilgi verildikten sonra, Türkiye’deki bazõ önemli raylõ ulaşõm sistemlerinin kapasiteleri farklõ yöntemlerle hesaplanarak, birbirleriyle karşõlaştõrõlmaya çalõşõlmõştõr. 1.GİRİŞ Dünyada 179 farklõ şehrin benimsendiği Metro ,hafif raylõ ve tramvay gibi kentiçi raylõ ulaşõm sistemleri, son yõllarda geç kalõnmasõna rağmen belediyelerimizin de rağbet ettiği ve ulaşõm politikalarõnõn baş hedefi haline gelen pahalõ inşaat yatõrõmlarõdõr.
    [Show full text]
  • GMT Report2012.Qxp
    GLOBAL METRO PROJECTS REPORT 2012 Metropolitan railways (metros) are high capacity electric transport systems that operate on dedicated routes, and can thereby achieve high service speed and frequency. Over the last few years, metros (also known as subway, underground or tube) have evolved as an efficient and effective urban mobility solution in addressing the growing concerns of urbanisation and climate change. This is supported by the fact that despite high capital requirements the sector witnessed a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.7 per cent between 2005 and 2010. In high density urban areas, metros form the backbone of integrated public transport systems and offer proven economic, social and environmental benefits. Given the huge investment requirement and long life span, metro systems have always been a driving force for technological and financial innovations. Government and metro operators are constantly seeking solutions to improve reliability and customer service, lower fuel and maintenance costs, as well as increase efficiency and safety levels in operations. The Global Metro Projects Report provides updated information on the world's top 101 metro projects that present significant capital investment opportunities. These projects have a total existing network length of about 8,900 km and a proposed length of over 8,000 km. The report covers 51 countries representing about 80 per cent of the world’s gross domestic product. It presents the key information required to assess investment opportunities in the development of new lines, extension and upgrade of existing lines, rolling stock procurement and refurbishment, power and communication systems upgrades, fare collection, as well as station construction and refurbishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerpoint Sunusu
    TURKISH STATE RAILWAYS (TCDD) Infrastructure Development & Regulations in Railway Sector NAZIM BÜKÜLMEZ Deputy Head of RP&C Department1 CONTENTS Vision and Mission Historical Development The State of the Art Key Projects Vision 2023 Rail systems in Urban Transportation The Law on Liberalization of Turkish Rail Transportation CONTENTS Vision and Mission Historical Development Current Situation Key Projects Vision 2023 Rail systems in Urban Transportation The Law on Liberalization of Turkish Rail Transportation VISION and MISSION of TCDD Vision: Mission: To make railways the preferred To have the existing network mode of transport and to be and vehicles ready for service, the locomotive power for to construct new lines and development of the country links if necessary, to keep connections with other transport systems, and to provide economical, safe, comfortable and environmentally friendly transport services CONTENTS Vision and Mission Historical Development Current Situation Key Projects Vision 2023 Rail systems in Urban Transportation The Law on Liberalization of Turkish Rail Transportation HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF RAILWAYS EDİRNE ZONGULDAK SAMSUN İSTANBUL KARS ERZURUM BANDIRMA ANKARA BURSA ESKİŞEHİR SİVAS ERZİNCAN POLATLI AFYON ELAZIĞ TATVAN VAN İZMİR KAYSERİ MALATYA KONYA DİYARBAKIR ADANA GAZİANTEP MERSİN 2012 : 12,008 km ( Conventional+ High Speed) Rail Network before the REPUBLIC 4,136 km Mainline The First Years of the REPUBLIC (1923-1950) 3,764 km Mainline (avg. 134 km per annum) From 1951 to 2002 945 km Mainline (avg. 18 km per annum) From 2005 to end of 2012 1,094 km Mainline (avg. 137km per annum) Lines under construction 3,400 km Mainline TCDD is a 157-year old enterprise 10 million passengers were transported.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Exploitation Plan
    D9.10 – Final Exploitation Plan Jorge Lpez (Atos), Alessandra Tedeschi (DBL), Julian Williams (UDUR), abio Massacci (UNITN), Raminder Ruprai (NGRID), Andreas Schmitz ( raunhofer), Emilio Lpez (URJC), Michael Pellot (TMB), Zden,a Mansfeldov. (ISASCR), Jan J/r0ens ( raunhofer) Pending of approval from the Research Executive Agency - EC Document Number D1.10 Document Title inal e5ploitation plan Version 1.0 Status inal Work Packa e WP 1 Deliverable Type Report Contractual Date of Delivery 31 .01 .20 18 Actual Date of Delivery 31.01.2018 Responsible Unit ATOS Contributors ISASCR, UNIDUR, UNITN, NGRID, DBL, URJC, raunhofer, TMB (eyword List E5ploitation, ramewor,, Preliminary, Requirements, Policy papers, Models, Methodologies, Templates, Tools, Individual plans, IPR Dissemination level PU SECONO.ICS Consortium SECONOMICS ?Socio-Economics meets SecurityA (Contract No. 28C223) is a Collaborative pro0ect) within the 7th ramewor, Programme, theme SEC-2011.E.8-1 SEC-2011.7.C-2 ICT. The consortium members are: UniversitG Degli Studi di Trento (UNITN) Pro0ect Manager: prof. abio Massacci 1 38100 Trento, Italy abio.MassacciHunitn.it www.unitn.it DEEP BLUE Srl (DBL) Contact: Alessandra Tedeschi 2 00113 Roma, Italy Alessandra.tedeschiHdblue.it www.dblue.it raunhofer -Gesellschaft zur Irderung der angewandten Contact: Prof. Jan J/r0ens 3 orschung e.V., Hansastr. 27c, 0an.0uer0ensHisst.fraunhofer.de 80E8E Munich, Germany http://www.fraunhofer.de/ UNIVERSIDAD REL JUAN CARLOS, Contact: Prof. David Rios Insua 8 Calle TulipanS/N, 28133, Mostoles david.riosHur0c.es
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Annual Report 2019 ALARKO HOLDİNG A.Ş. CONTENTS 4 ALARKO GROUP OF COMPANIES 63 EARNINGS FROM SUBSIDIARIES AND EQUITY PARTICIPATIONS 6 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN 64 BUSINESS VOLUME AND 8 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERSPECTIVES FOR 2020 DIRECTORS AND AUDITORS OF ALARKO HOLDING A.Ş. 65 TAXES PAID AND PERSONNEL EXPENSES 10 GENERAL ORGANIZATION 66 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAST 12 MANAGEMENT STAFF FIVE YEARS 14 FINANCIAL INDICATORS 67 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING OUR ACTIVITIES 16 MILESTONES OF 65 YEARS 76 PROPOSAL FOR DIVIDEND 20 AGENDA OF THE ORDINARY DISTRIBUTION GENERAL ASSEMBLY 77 DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE 21 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD WITH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF DIRECTORS PRINCIPLES 23 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE ALARKO 77 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GROUP COMPLIANCE REPORT 24 CONTRACTING GROUP 84 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INFORMATION FORM 34 ENERGY GROUP 90 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 42 INDUSTRY AND TRADE GROUP ON THE ANNUAL REPORT 50 TOURISM GROUP 92 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR 56 LAND DEVELOPMENT GROUP ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019 WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 60 İSHAK ALATON’S VIEW 93 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 61 DR. ÜZEYİR GARİH’S VIEW 98 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL 62 CAPITALS AND PERCENTAGES OF STATEMENTS SHAREHOLDINGS IN SUBSIDIARIES AND PARTICIPATIONS 196 CONCLUSION 14.07.2020 FISCAL YEAR 2019 GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING REGISTERED CAPITAL TL 500,000,000 ISSUED CAPITAL TL 435,000,000 1 ALARKO HOLDİNG A.Ş. Annual Report 2019 2 Annual Report 2019 ALARKO HOLDİNG A.Ş. The success line of a long-term business is shaped at the outset. Planning is the first driver of success. Poor planning is a guarantee of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning Volume 1, Issue 2, pp:132-151. ISSN: 2147-9380 available online at: www.iconarp.com ICONARP Successes and Failures in Urban Development of Ankara Özge YALÇINER ERCOŞKUN Abstract Ankara, the capital of Turkey, represents a modern model city built in Keywords: the Republican period after 1923. The majority of the countries’ Ankara, Urban Planning, Car- Oriented policies, Transformation, population resides in this city after İstanbul and political, social and economic functions are mostly clustered in the urban zone. After 1940s, Urban Sustainability the city changed dramatically. Its population grew enormously and the city expanded through conversion of agricultural lands in the west. In addition, political and educational developments produced a significant Özge YALÇINER ERCOŞKUN, Doç.Dr. population of officials and students within the city. This paper focuses Gazi Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü, on patterns of settlement in Ankara from ancient times to today and Ankara. explains these from developments in the urban planning perspective. It [email protected] concludes that the global shopping malls and local transport- landuse policies together with the structure of housing market have directed the city to car-oriented sprawled development without an identity, encouraged the development of gated communities in the city. It InternationalJournal Architectureof and Planning Özge YALÇINER ERCOŞKUN concludes by posing the question whether this may change in the future and more mixed use can be expected. Özet Türkiye’nin başkenti Ankara, 1923’te Cumhuriyetin kurulmasıyla modern kentin simgesi olmuştur. İstanbul’dan sonra ülke nüfusunun çoğunluğunun yaşadığı kentte politik, sosyal ve ekonomik işlevler kentsel bölgede kümelenmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Trams Der Welt / Trams of the World 2021 Daten / Data © 2021 Peter Sohns Seite / Page 1
    www.blickpunktstrab.net – Trams der Welt / Trams of the World 2021 Daten / Data © 2021 Peter Sohns Seite / Page 1 Algeria ... Alger (Algier) ... Metro ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Alger (Algier) ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Constantine ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Oran ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Ouragla ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Sétif ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Sidi Bel Abbès ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF ... Metro ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Caballito ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Lacroze (General Urquiza) ... Interurban (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Premetro E ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Tren de la Costa ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Córdoba, Córdoba ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Mar del Plata, BA ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 900 mm Argentina ... Mendoza, Mendoza ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Mendoza, Mendoza ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Rosario, Santa Fé ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Rosario, Santa Fé ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Valle Hermoso, Córdoba ... Tram-Museum (Electric) ... 600 mm Armenia ... Yerevan ... Metro ... 1524 mm Armenia ... Yerevan ... Trolleybus Australia ... Adelaide, SA - Glenelg ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Australia ... Ballarat, VIC ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Australia ... Bendigo, VIC ... Heritage-Tram
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Turkish Rail Transit Investments
    AN ANALYSIS OF RAIL TRANSIT INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY: ARE THE EXPECTATIONS MET? A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ÖZGE ÖZGÜR IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN URBAN DESIGN IN CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING NOVEMBER 2009 Approval of the thesis: AN ANALYSIS OF RAIL TRANSIT INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY: ARE THE EXPECTATIONS MET? submitted by ÖZGE ÖZGÜR in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in City and Regional Planning Department, Urban Design, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Canan Özgen _____________________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Melih Ersoy _____________________ Head of Department, City and Regional Planning Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ela Babalık Sutcliffe _____________________ Supervisor, City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Ali Türel _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ela Babalık Sutcliffe _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Baykan Günay _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Ebru Vesile Öcalır _____________________ Traffic Planning and Implementation Dept., Gazi University Turgay Günal, M.Sc. _____________________ Date: 18.11.2009 ________________ iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Özge ÖZGÜR iii ABSTRACT AN ANALYSIS OF RAIL TRANSIT INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY: ARE THE EXPECTATIONS MET?* Özgür, Özge M.S., Department of City and Regional Planning, Urban Design Supervisor: Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Türk Sorumluluk Hukukuna Göre Demiryolu Işletenin Akit Dişi Sorumluluğu
    TC. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENTİTÜSÜ ÖZEL HUKUK (MEDENİ HUKUK) ANABİLİM DALI TÜRK SORUMLULUK HUKUKUNA GÖRE DEMİRYOLU İŞLETENİN AKİT DIŞI SORUMLULUĞU Doktora Tezi Ayşe EROL SARIYEV Ankara-2018 TC. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENTİTÜSÜ ÖZEL HUKUK (MEDENİ HUKUK) ANABİLİM DALI TÜRK SORUMLULUK HUKUKUNA GÖRE DEMİRYOLU İŞLETENİN AKİT DIŞI SORUMLULUĞU Doktora Tezi Ayşe EROL SARIYEV Tez Danışmanı Prof. Dr. Hasan İŞGÜZAR Ankara-2018 TC. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENTİTÜSÜ ÖZEL HUKUK (MEDENİ HUKUK) ANABİLİM DALI Ayşe EROL SARIYEV TÜRK SORUMLULUK HUKUKUNA GÖRE DEMİRYOLU İŞLETENİN AKİT DIŞI SORUMLULUĞU Doktora Tezi Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. Hasan İŞGÜZAR Tez Jürisi Üyeleri Adı ve Soyadı İmzası ………………………………. …………………… ………………………............. ….………………… ………………………………. …………………… ………………………………. ....………………… ………………………………. …………………… Tez Sınav Tarihi………………. TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ’NE Bu belge ile, bu tezdeki bütün bilgilerin akademik kurallara ve etik davranış ilkelerine uygun olarak toplanıp sunulduğunu beyan ederim. Bu kural ve ilkelerin gereği olarak, çalışmada bana ait olmayan tüm veri, düşünce ve sonuçları andığımı ve kaynağını gösterdiğimi ayrıca beyan ederim. .2018 Tezi Hazırlayan Öğrencinin Adı ve Soyadı Ayşe EROL SARIYEV İmzası İÇİNDEKİLER Sayfa İÇİNDEKİLER ......................................................................................................... I KISALTMALAR ................................................................................................ VIII
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Guidance: Detailed Coverage for Supported Transit Systems
    Urban Guidance: Detailed coverage for supported transit systems Andorra .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Argentina ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Austria .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Brazil ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Chile ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Colombia .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Croatia .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]