Lower Athabasca Regional Plan Digital

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lower Athabasca Regional Plan Digital IES NORTHWEST TERRITOR B A Tsu Nedehe Tue I.R. 196H ?Ejere K'elni Kue I.R. 196I WOOD BUFFALO NATIONAL PARK 1 1 S A FORT CHIPEWYAN S K A T C ! FORT VERMILION H E W 2 A 2 N 5 4 FORT MACKAY NEW CONSERVATION AND RECREATION/TOURISM AREAS IN THE LOWER ATHABASCA REGION 3 FORT MCMURRAY 4 Conservation Areas DRAPER Wildland Provincial Parks SAPRAE CREEK 1 Kazan Wildland Park TES 2 R i c hardson Wildland Park GREGOIRE LAKE ESTA 3 ANZAC 3 Gipsy-Gordon Wildland Park 4 Birch Mountains Provincial Wildland Park (Expansion) C Public Land-use Zones La Loche 5 Birch River Conservation Area D Road 6 Dillon River Conservation Area Recreation/Tourism Areas Provincial Recreation Areas A S l ave River Rapids JANVIER SOUTH B Andrew Lake E C Gregoire Lake F D Christina Crossing E Cowper Lake CONKLIN F Crow Lake G Goodwin Lake 5 H Clyde Lake 6 I Winefred Lake G I Public Land Areas for Recreation/Tourism H 1 Lake Athabasca 2 Richardson 3 Athabasca River COLD LAKE AIR 4 Clearwater River 5 House River WEAPONS RANGE Lakeland Country Iconic Tourism Destination Base Data LAC LA BICHE Land-use Framework Regional Boundary First Nations Reserve SCA Green Area Métis Settlement ATHABA White Area Military Reserve Provincial Park and Protected Area Hydrography COLD LAKE National Park Provincial Highway PELICAN City, Town, Urban Service Area Other Population Centres NARROWS BONNYVILLE GLENDON E BEACH 0 25 50 100 BONNYVILL Kilometres Transverse Mercator Projection (10TM) North American Datum 1983 (NAD83) SMOKY LAKE SOURCE INFORMATION: Conservation Areas: Alberta Sustainable Resource Development and Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation Recreation/Tourism Areas: Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation and Alberta Sustainable Resource Development RED WATER ST. PAUL K POINT Provincial Parks & Protected Areas: Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation LEGAL EL Base Map Data Provided by Spatial Data Warehouse Ltd. Spatial Data Outside of Alberta: Natural Resources Canada (GeoGratis) Saskatchewan Parks & Protected Areas: Information Services Corporation of Saskatchewan BON DISCLAIMER: ACCORD BRUDERHEIM These materials are provided "as is" without warranties or conditions of any kind either expressed or implied GIBBONS as the information as depicted is subject to change; therefore the Government of Alberta assumes no responsibility for discrepancies at time of use. The Crown in right of Alberta, the Minister and her employees LAMONT and agents, shall not be liable for any claims, costs, losses, or damages, including any special, indirect, MORINVILLE incidental or consequential loss or damage, which the user may incur or experience as a result of the use TWO or possession of the information. ST. ALBERT FORT HILLS SASKATCHEWAN Effective XXXX NDARE Author: Land Use Secretariat EDMONTON MU.
Recommended publications
  • Volume 2: Baseline, Section 13: Traditional Land Use September 2011 Volume 2: Baseline Studies Frontier Project Section 13: Traditional Land Use
    R1 R24 R23 R22 R21 R20 T113 R19 R18 R17 R16 Devil's Gate 220 R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 ! T112 Fort Chipewyan Allison Bay 219 T111 Dog Head 218 T110 Lake Claire ³ Chipewyan 201A T109 Chipewyan 201B T108 Old Fort 217 Chipewyan 201 T107 Maybelle River T106 Wildland Provincial Wood Buffalo National Park Park Alberta T105 Richardson River Dunes Wildland Athabasca Dunes Saskatchewan Provincial Park Ecological Reserve T104 Chipewyan 201F T103 Chipewyan 201G T102 T101 2888 T100 Marguerite River Wildland Provincial Park T99 1661 850 Birch Mountains T98 Wildland Provincial Namur River Park 174A 33 2215 T97 94 2137 1716 T96 1060 Fort McKay 174C Namur Lake 174B 2457 239 1714 T95 21 400 965 2172 T94 ! Fort McKay 174D 1027 Fort McKay Marguerite River 2006 Wildland Provincial 879 T93 771 Park 772 2718 2926 2214 2925 T92 587 2297 2894 T91 T90 274 Whitemud Falls T89 65 !Fort McMurray Wildland Provincial Park T88 Clearwater 175 Clearwater River T87Traditional Land Provincial Park Fort McKay First Nation Gregoire Lake Provincial Park T86 Registered Fur Grand Rapids Anzac Management Area (RFMA) Wildland Provincial ! Gipsy Lake Wildland Park Provincial Park T85 Traditional Land Use Regional Study Area Gregoire Lake 176, T84 176A & 176B Traditional Land Use Local Study Area T83 ST63 ! Municipality T82 Highway Stony Mountain Township Wildland Provincial T81 Park Watercourse T80 Waterbody Cowper Lake 194A I.R. Janvier 194 T79 Wabasca 166 Provincial Park T78 National Park 0 15 30 45 T77 KILOMETRES 1:1,500,000 UTM Zone 12 NAD 83 T76 Date: 20110815 Author: CES Checked: DC File ID: 123510543-097 (Original page size: 8.5X11) Acknowledgements: Base data: AltaLIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Benefits of Approaches Used to Integrate Regional Monitoring Programs
    POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS published: 07 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.666698 Challenges and Benefits of Approaches Used to Integrate Regional Monitoring Programs T. J. Arciszewski 1*, D. R. Roberts 1, K. R. Munkittrick 2 and G. J. Scrimgeour 3 1Resource Stewardship Division, Alberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3Office of the Chief Scientist, Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB, Canada Although challenging to develop and operate, some degree of integrated monitoring is often necessary, especially at regional scales, to address the complex questions of environmental management and regulation. The concept of integration is well- understood, but its practice across programs and studies can be diverse suggesting a broader examination of the existing general approaches is needed. From the literature, we suggest integration of monitoring can occur across three study components: interpretation, analysis, and design. Design can be further subdivided into partial and full integration. Respectively combining information, data, and designs, we further define these types of integration and describe their general benefits and challenges, such as Edited by: Juergen Pilz, strength of inference. We further use the Oil Sands Monitoring program in northern Alberta University of Klagenfurt, Austria as an example to clarify the practices common among integrated monitoring programs. Reviewed by: The goal of the discussion paper is to familiarize readers with the diverse practices of Costica Nitu, fi Politehnica University of Bucharest, integrated monitoring to further clarify the various con gurations used to achieve the wider Romania goals of a program. Paul Makar, Environment and Climate Change Keywords: environmental monitoring, integrated monitoring, oil sands, regional monitoring program, environmental Canada, Canada managemenent *Correspondence: T.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda for January 13, 2014
    TOWN OF BANFF ORDER OF BUSINESS Regular Council Meeting Town of Banff Council Chambers Monday, January 13, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER 2.0 APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2.1 Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation: That council approve the agenda for the January 13, 2014 regular meeting of council. 3.0 ADOPTION OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL MINUTES 3.1 Minutes of the December 19, 2013 Regular Meeting of Council Recommendation: That council adopt the minutes of the December 19, 2013 regular meeting of council. 3.2 Minutes of the December 23, 2013 Special Meeting of Council Recommendation: That council adopt the minutes of the December 23, 2013 special meeting of council. 4.0 DELEGATIONS 4.1 Bob Ellard – Alberta Winter Games 5.0 PUBLIC INPUT ON AGENDA ITEMS 6.0 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7.0 BYLAWS AND STAFF REPORTS 7.1 Request for Decision: Proposed Rickshaw Tour Service – 211 Bear Street Recommendation: That council consider the appropriateness of rickshaws and pedicabs for hire on Town of Banff streets and trails and provide one of the following directions to administration: a. Direct administration to give further consideration the proposed rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street after returning to council with a draft of the required bylaw amendments that would allow for such services; b. Direct administration to work with the proponent to make changes to current proposal for a rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street that would allow for the service under the current bylaws; c. Direct administration to refuse the proposed rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street as a result of non-conformance with the provisions of the Town of Banff Traffic Bylaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Provide Information on Department
    Written Responses from the Ministry of Environment and Parks Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Oct. 22, 2019) Topic: Provide information on department estimates on what Alberta’s emissions would have been without climate leadership action that had been implemented in the past four years? (Reference Transcript PA-83, Mr. Schmidt) • This information is available in the Climate Leadership Plan 2017-18 Progress Report available on the Open Data Portal at https://open.alberta.ca/publications/climate- leadership-plan-progress-report-2017-18 • Specifically, this information can be located in the “Ultimate Outcomes: Reduced GHG Emissions section” on page 17 of the report, excerpted below: o The Climate Leadership Plan (CLP) reference case (Table 1) represents current expectations for future GHG emissions based on 2018 federal and CLP climate policies, and on economic growth as projected in 2018. Emissions are forecast to decrease through 2018, then remain at about the same level even with increasing population, economic growth and oil sands production. Table 1 include Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)’s 2015 historical forecast (before the CLP) that is referenced in the Climate Change Advisory Panel’s Report to Government. The historical forecast is adjusted for ECCC data updates in 2018. Differences between the historical forecast and the CLP reference case include CLP’s projected GHG reductions, differences in economic growth and methodologies used to project emissions. The CLP reference case with potential reductions from innovation
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Filename
    MOOSA CROSSOVER PROJECT ESA 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SETTING This section of the ESA presents a summary description of the existing biophysical and socio-economic environment potentially affected by the Project. Results of field surveys conducted in 2012 and winter 2013 have been included in this ESA report. Vegetation and wildlife reconnaissance surveys were conducted in September 2012, and additional wildlife surveys were conducted in October 2012 and March 2013. Aquatic surveys were conducted in October 2012, and winter fisheries surveys were conducted in February 2013. Methods used to determine baseline conditions for each environmental or socio-economic resource are described in the relevant subsection. The Project is located in northeast Alberta, approximately 35 km northwest of Fort McMurray. The Project footprint is located within the Northern Alberta Lowlands Physiographic Region, and crosses Crown land in the Green Area of Alberta, including two watercourses. 5.1 Study Areas The spatial boundaries or study areas considered in the description of environmental setting and assessment of potential Project effects on the environmental components include one or more of the following: Project footprint, LSA, RSA, and socio-economic study area. These study areas were used to capture the potential direct and indirect effects of the Project on each VC and their associated KI, as well as to understand the context within which the effects can occur. The LSAs and RSAs used in the effects assessment vary by environmental and socio-economic element. The LSAs were established to assess the potential, largely direct effects of the Project on the local environment. Each VC and baseline setting component is considered in defining the LSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/2014-Ghg-Emissions-From-Oil-Sands-Tailings-Ponds-Overview- And-Modelling-Based-On-Fermentable-Sub.Pdf (Accessed on 14 May 2021)
    minerals Review Geochemical Stability of Oil Sands Tailings in Mine Closure Landforms Heidi L. Cossey 1, Anya E. Batycky 1 , Heather Kaminsky 2 and Ania C. Ulrich 1,* 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada; [email protected] (H.L.C.); [email protected] (A.E.B.) 2 Centre for Oil Sands Sustainability, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT), Edmonton, AB T5G 0Y2, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-780-492-8293 Abstract: Oil sands surface mining in Alberta has generated over a billion cubic metres of waste, known as tailings, consisting of sands, silts, clays, and process-affected water that contains toxic organic compounds and chemical constituents. All of these tailings will eventually be reclaimed and integrated into one of two types of mine closure landforms: end pit lakes (EPLs) or terrestrial landforms with a wetland feature. In EPLs, tailings deposits are capped with several metres of water while in terrestrial landforms, tailings are capped with solid materials, such as sand or overburden. Because tailings landforms are relatively new, past research has heavily focused on the geotechnical and biogeochemical characteristics of tailings in temporary storage ponds, referred to as tailings ponds. As such, the geochemical stability of tailings landforms remains largely unknown. This review discusses five mechanisms of geochemical change expected in tailings landforms: consolidation, chemical mass loading via pore water fluxes, biogeochemical cycling, polymer degradation, and surface water and groundwater interactions. Key considerations and knowledge gaps with regard Citation: Cossey, H.L.; Batycky, A.E.; Kaminsky, H.; Ulrich, A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Athabasca Regional Plan 2012 - 2022
    Lower Athabasca Regional Plan 2012 - 2022 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Land-use Planning in Alberta ................................................................................................................... 3 Informing Land-use Decisions ................................................................................................................. 5 Plan Structure ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Regulatory Details Plan Part 1 General ....................................................................................... 7 Strategic Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 13 The Region Today .................................................................................................................................... 14 Economic Development .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Oil Sands Industry Quarterly Update
    ALBERTA OIL SANDS INDUSTRY QUARTERLY UPDATE WINTER 2013 Reporting on the period: Sep. 18, 2013 to Dec. 05, 2013 2 ALBERTA OIL SANDS INDUSTRY QUARTERLY UPDATE Canada has the third-largest oil methods. Alberta will continue to rely All about reserves in the world, after Saudi to a greater extent on in situ production Arabia and Venezuela. Of Canada’s in the future, as 80 per cent of the 173 billion barrels of oil reserves, province’s proven bitumen reserves are the oil sands 170 billion barrels are located in too deep underground to recover using Background of an Alberta, and about 168 billion barrels mining methods. are recoverable from bitumen. There are essentially two commercial important global resource This is a resource that has been methods of in situ (Latin for “in developed for decades but is now place,” essentially meaning wells are gaining increased global attention used rather than trucks and shovels). as conventional supplies—so-called In cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), “easy” oil—continue to be depleted. high-pressure steam is injected into The figure of 168 billion barrels TABLE OF CONTENTS directional wells drilled from pads of bitumen represents what is for a period of time, then the steam considered economically recoverable is left to soak in the reservoir for a All about the oil sands with today’s technology, but with period, melting the bitumen, and 02 new technologies, this reserve then the same wells are switched estimate could be significantly into production mode, bringing the increased. In fact, total oil sands Mapping the oil sands bitumen to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND OWNERSHIP MAP Map Produced by the Kilometers Geographic Information Systems Group ATS Township Privately Owned Land Lakes, Rivers Railway on April 15, 2020
    Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo North NORTHWEST TERRITORIES THABACHA SEE 'MAP A' Selwyn Lake NARE 196A TSU TUE 196G Salt River 126 K'I TUE 196D Mercredi Treasure Loch Lake TTHE JERE Bayonet Lake Tulip GHAILI Dawson Lake Andrew Lake 196B FITZGERALD CHARLES Lake LAKE 225 LI DEZE 196C One Week Lake 125 THEBATHI 196 Arch Lake Charles Hutton Lake Lake Ashton Lake TSU K'ADHE Pans 124 MAP A Potts McLelland TUE 196F Lake Lake Lake Leland Lakes Leggo Lake Cherry Lake HOKEDHE Whaleback Lister Lake Lake TUE 196E St. Agnes 123 Myers Lake Lake Alexander Lake NORTHWEST TERRITORIES CORNWALL LAKE 224 COLLIN LAKE 223 Colin-Cornwall Cornwall Lakes Wildland Colin Lake Slave River Cockscomb Hooker Lake Lake Woodman THABACHA Lake Lake NARE 196A 121 Bocquene River Roderick Lake Peters Bocquene Lake Lake SASKATCHEWAN 120 De Manville Turtle Lake Lake La Butte Creek La Butte SLFN Creek Burstall DEVELOPMENT Wildland CORP. Lake 119 Wylie Lake Darwin Lake Bryant Lake SCHAEFER, C Slave River Florence Lake Barrow Lake Winnifred Lake FLINT, D Fidler-Greywillow Ryan Lake Wildland 474314 ALBERTA LTD 0 20 40 ROOTS & RUMINANTS INC. F O R Kilometers T S M I T H W I N T E Powder Creek R T RA IL Loutit Lake SANDY Flett POINT 221 a Lake c s Municipal District of Mackenzie No.23 a b a 114 h MAP B Riviere t des Rochers A ALLISON e DEVIL'S BAY 219 k GATE 220 a L 113 SEE 'MAP B' DEVIL'S GATE 220 FORT CHIPEWYAN 112 111 Goose Island ALLISON BAY Channel CHIPEWYAN 219 CHIPEWYAN 201B 201A Big Point Harrison Embarras Channel River Fletcher River Channel CHIPEWYAN 201 109 CHIPEWYAN Brander Lake Limon 201C OLD Fort Lake Old Fort Lake Athabasca FORT 217 Jackfish River Chipewyan Blanche Lake Richardson Creek 108 Lake CHIPEWYAN 201E F O R T .
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cold Lake MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN January 2021 | Draft
    City of Cold Lake MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN January 2021 | Draft En Table of Contents Part 1: Current Reality and Aspirations 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Plan Purpose 1 1.2 Interpretation 1 1.3 Enactment 2 1.4 Duration 2 1.5 Preparing the Municipal Development Plan 2 1.6 Structure of the Plan 3 2.0 Community Profile ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Location 4 2.2 Population and Land Supply 4 2.3 Infrastructure 6 3.0 Engagement Summary and Community Capabilities ................................................... 9 3.1 Challenges 10 3.2 Strengths and Assets 11 3.3 Opportunities 11 4.0 Vision and Guiding Principles ..................................................................................... 13 4.1 Vision 13 4.2 Guiding Principles 13 4.3 Big Moves 15 Part 2: Policy Framework 5.0 Land Use Development .............................................................................................. 17 5.1 Introduction 17 5.2 Land Use Concept 17 5.3 City Form 19 5.4 Nodes 20 5.5 Growth Management Strategy 20 5.6 Statutory Plans and Development Instruments 22 5.7 Residential Neighbourhood Design 23 5.8 Commercial Area Design 28 5.9 Industrial Area Design 29 5.10 Lakeshore Area Design and Development 30 5.11 Downtown Area Design and Development 32 5.12 Institutional and Civic Uses and Facilities 35 5.13 Parks and Open Spaces 36 5.14 Urban Design 38 6.0
    [Show full text]
  • Western Grebe Surveys in Alberta 2016
    WESTERN GREBE SURVEYS IN ALBERTA 2016 The western grebe has been listed as a Threatened species in Alberta. A recent data compilation shows that there are approximately 250 lakes that have supported western grebes in Alberta. However, information for most lakes is poor and outdate d. Total counts on lakes are rare, breeding status is uncertain, and the location and extent of breeding habitat (emergent vegetation, usually bulrush) is usually unknown. We are seeking your help in gathering more information on western grebe populations in Alberta. If you visit any of the lakes listed below, or know anyone that does, we would appreciate as much detail as you can collect on the presence of western grebes and their habitat. Let us know in advance (if possible) if you are planning on going to any lakes, and when you do, e-mail details of your observations to [email protected]. SURVEY METHODS: Visit a lake between 1 May and 31 August with spotting scope or good binoculars. Surveys can be done from a boat, or vantage point(s) from shore. Report names of surveyors, dates, number of adults seen, and report on the approximate percentage of the lake area that this number represents. Record presence of young birds or nesting colonies, and provide any additional information on presence/location of likely breeding habitat, specific parts of the lake observed, observed threats to birds or habitat (boat traffic, shoreline clearing, pollution, etc.). Please report on findings even if no birds were seen. Lakes on the following page that are flagged with an asterisk (*) were not visited in 2015, and are priority for survey in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts, Benefits, and Participatory Processes Around the Oil Sands Industry in Northern Alberta
    Taking Research Off the Shelf: Impacts, Benefits, and Participatory Processes around the Oil Sands Industry in Northern Alberta Final Report for the SSHRC Imagining Canada’s Future Initiative, Knowledge Synthesis Grants: Aboriginal Peoples September 11, 2017 Tara L. Joly, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Archaeology & Anthropology and School of Environment & Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK [email protected] Clinton N. Westman, Associate Professor (Environmental Anthropologist), Department of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK [email protected] Acknowledgements: For their guidance, the authors thank our research partners who contribute to the Cultural Politics of Energy partnership, including Bigstone Cree Nation, Kee Tas Kee Now Tribal Council, Keepers of the Athabasca, Loon River Cree First Nation, Lubicon Lake Nation, the McMurray Métis, Mikisew Cree First Nation, Peerless Trout First Nation, and Woodland Cree First Nation. We extend our gratitude to library and archival support provided at the University of Alberta, the Government of Alberta library, Athabasca University, and the University of Calgary. Thanks to Josie Auger, Melanie Dene, Marley Duckett, Patricia McCormack, Jacinthe Messier, Mary Richardson, Glenn Stuart, Jim Waldram, and Katherine Wheatley who provided thoughtful comments on drafts of this report. This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada through a Knowledge Synthesis Grant (KSG) and a Partnership Development Grant (PDG) held by Westman. We also acknowledge intellectual contributions from collaborators on the PDG, particularly co- applicants Colin Scott and Dwight Newman. Finally, we are all grateful to have been guided by Elders in prayer and ceremony during this knowledge mobilization process. i Key Messages • Social science (i.e., research, assessment, and monitoring on social impacts) in the oil sands region has been woefully inadequate, even as the region has undergone transformational change.
    [Show full text]