Final Sea Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Sea Report VOLUME 1: MILESTONE 3 - FINAL SEA REPORT Strategic Environmental Assessment of Wood Buffalo National Park World Heritage Site It will be iniS May 2018 FINAL REPORT: Strategic Environmental Assessment of Wood Buffalo National Park COVERING LETTER Independent Environmental Consultants 70 Valleywood Drive, Suite 200 Markham, ON, L3R 4T5 Tel/Fax: 844-736-7369 PSX16-0057 30 May 2018 Parks Canada Government of Canada 145 McDermot Avenue Winnipeg MB R3B 0R9 Attention: Katherine Cumming National Manager of Impact Assessment, Natural Resource Conservation Branch RE: Final Strategic Environmental Assessment of Potential Cumulative Impacts of all Developments on the Outstanding Universal Value of Wood Buffalo National Park World Heritage Site Independent Environmental Consultants (IEC) is pleased to submit this final Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) report. This two-volume report is being submitted in accordance with completion of Milestone 3 of the above noted Contract. Yours very truly, Independent Environmental Consultants Donald M. Gorber, PhD, P. Eng. President Page i FINAL REPORT: Strategic Environmental Assessment of Wood Buffalo National Park ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The journey to complete this Strategic Environmental Assessment has involved the gathering of a significant volume of available information, including both western science and Indigenous Traditional Knowledge. All of this has been accomplished through phone discussions with government staff, researchers, industrial associations and Non-Government Environmental Organizations, and face-to-face meetings with the local Cree, Dene and Métis representatives. This valuable and graciously provided information has made this report a more complete and holistic document. In particular we valued the participation, cooperation, direct input, and review from the Indigenous groups in and around the Wood Buffalo National Park, including Mikisew Cree First Nation, Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Fort Chipewyan Métis Local 125, Little Red River Cree Nation, Salt River First Nation, Smith’s Landing First Nation, K’atlodeeche First Nation, Deninu K’ue First Nation, and Northwest Territories Métis Nation (Hay River Métis Government Council and Fort Smith Métis, and Fort Resolution Métis Council). These groups have a generational commitment to the land, water and animals of the park and its surrounding area. They have lived there since long before the park was formed and, in remembering what it was like in the past, hope to restore it for future generations. They are proud and eloquent peoples with the ability to cut to the heart of the issue to develop powerful sayings such as “Water is Boss”, which directly communicate their thoughts in a very meaningful way. The various meetings with Elders, councillors, land users and other community members were extremely valuable to this report. In spite of sharing their stories many times for similar studies, the land users were very generous with their time and participated in the SEA process in good faith. Each of the Indigenous groups were given an opportunity to review, edit and provide input to the report before it went out to others for review. For these generous and open contributions, we are extremely grateful. There are many researchers working on environmental, social, cultural, Indigenous and engineering issues related to the park. Where there were alternative views on topics, we have tried to present both sides. We thank those researchers for their valuable input. To all members of the IEC team and all your valuable contributions, a heartfelt thanks. In particular, the endless hours put in by Lisa White and Cole Atlin in researching, writing, editing and meeting with the Indigenous peoples has to be recognized. Lastly, this was a Parks Canada project. Their help in directing, coordinating, writing and editing the report, facilitating meetings with researchers, government partners, and Indigenous groups and providing guidance throughout the project was an extremely valuable contribution. Specifically, the extensive input and involvement by Katherine Cumming, Steve Oates, Patrick Yarnell, Stuart Macmillan, Cam Zimmer and Don Aubrey is greatly appreciated. Page ii FINAL REPORT: Strategic Environmental Assessment of Wood Buffalo National Park VOLUME 1: FINAL SEA REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS COVERING LETTER ............................................................................................................................................................ I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...................................................................................................................................................... II SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ VIII DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................................. XV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: ASSESSMENT SCOPE AND FOCUS ............................................................................................................................1-1 The World Heritage Convention ...............................................................................................................................1-1 1.1.1 Initiating Petition ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Request for an SEA ......................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.3 Reactive Monitoring Mission ......................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.4 Request for Action Plan .................................................................................................................................................. 1-3 Introduction to Strategic Environmental Assessment ...............................................................................................1-4 1.2.1 Cumulative Effects and SEA ........................................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.2 Cumulative Impacts to Indigenous Ways of Life ............................................................................................................ 1-6 1.2.3 Benefits of SEA ............................................................................................................................................................... 1-8 Purpose of the SEA ....................................................................................................................................................1-9 Guiding Principles ...................................................................................................................................................1-10 1.4.1 World Heritage Values ................................................................................................................................................. 1-10 1.4.2 Ecological Integrity ....................................................................................................................................................... 1-10 1.4.3 Indigenous Rights and Ways of Life.............................................................................................................................. 1-11 Approach to the SEA ...............................................................................................................................................1-12 1.5.1 Study Limitations.......................................................................................................................................................... 1-13 1.5.2 Changes Based on the Review of the Draft Scoping Report ......................................................................................... 1-14 1.5.3 Structure of the SEA ..................................................................................................................................................... 1-15 CHAPTER 2: SITE CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................................2-1 Wood Buffalo National Park .....................................................................................................................................2-1 World Heritage Values ..............................................................................................................................................2-2 Indigenous Perspectives on the SEA ..........................................................................................................................2-3 2.3.1 Indigenous Perspectives on World Heritage Values ....................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.2 Concerns about Water Levels in the PAD ....................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.3 Negative Histories Between Parks Canada and Indigenous Peoples .............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Comprehensive Guide to the Alberta Oil Sands
    A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO THE ALBERTA OIL SANDS UNDERSTANDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND HUMAN IMPACTS , EXPORT IMPLICATIONS , AND POLITICAL , ECONOMIC , AND INDUSTRY INFLUENCES Michelle Mech May 2011 (LAST REVISED MARCH 2012) A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO THE ALBERTA OIL SANDS UNDERSTANDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND HUMAN IMPACTS , EXPORT IMPLICATIONS , AND POLITICAL , ECONOMIC , AND INDUSTRY INFLUENCES ABOUT THIS REPORT Just as an oil slick can spread far from its source, the implications of Oil Sands production have far reaching effects. Many people only read or hear about isolated aspects of these implications. Media stories often provide only a ‘window’ of information on one specific event and detailed reports commonly center around one particular facet. This paper brings together major points from a vast selection of reports, studies and research papers, books, documentaries, articles, and fact sheets relating to the Alberta Oil Sands. It is not inclusive. The objective of this document is to present sufficient information on the primary factors and repercussions involved with Oil Sands production and export so as to provide the reader with an overall picture of the scope and implications of Oil Sands current production and potential future development, without perusing vast volumes of publications. The content presents both basic facts, and those that would supplement a general knowledge base of the Oil Sands and this document can be utilized wholly or in part, to gain or complement a perspective of one or more particular aspect(s) associated with the Oil Sands. The substantial range of Oil Sands- related topics is covered in brevity in the summary. This paper discusses environmental, resource, and health concerns, reclamation, viable alternatives, crude oil pipelines, and carbon capture and storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda for January 13, 2014
    TOWN OF BANFF ORDER OF BUSINESS Regular Council Meeting Town of Banff Council Chambers Monday, January 13, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER 2.0 APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2.1 Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation: That council approve the agenda for the January 13, 2014 regular meeting of council. 3.0 ADOPTION OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL MINUTES 3.1 Minutes of the December 19, 2013 Regular Meeting of Council Recommendation: That council adopt the minutes of the December 19, 2013 regular meeting of council. 3.2 Minutes of the December 23, 2013 Special Meeting of Council Recommendation: That council adopt the minutes of the December 23, 2013 special meeting of council. 4.0 DELEGATIONS 4.1 Bob Ellard – Alberta Winter Games 5.0 PUBLIC INPUT ON AGENDA ITEMS 6.0 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7.0 BYLAWS AND STAFF REPORTS 7.1 Request for Decision: Proposed Rickshaw Tour Service – 211 Bear Street Recommendation: That council consider the appropriateness of rickshaws and pedicabs for hire on Town of Banff streets and trails and provide one of the following directions to administration: a. Direct administration to give further consideration the proposed rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street after returning to council with a draft of the required bylaw amendments that would allow for such services; b. Direct administration to work with the proponent to make changes to current proposal for a rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street that would allow for the service under the current bylaws; c. Direct administration to refuse the proposed rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street as a result of non-conformance with the provisions of the Town of Banff Traffic Bylaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Provide Information on Department
    Written Responses from the Ministry of Environment and Parks Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Oct. 22, 2019) Topic: Provide information on department estimates on what Alberta’s emissions would have been without climate leadership action that had been implemented in the past four years? (Reference Transcript PA-83, Mr. Schmidt) • This information is available in the Climate Leadership Plan 2017-18 Progress Report available on the Open Data Portal at https://open.alberta.ca/publications/climate- leadership-plan-progress-report-2017-18 • Specifically, this information can be located in the “Ultimate Outcomes: Reduced GHG Emissions section” on page 17 of the report, excerpted below: o The Climate Leadership Plan (CLP) reference case (Table 1) represents current expectations for future GHG emissions based on 2018 federal and CLP climate policies, and on economic growth as projected in 2018. Emissions are forecast to decrease through 2018, then remain at about the same level even with increasing population, economic growth and oil sands production. Table 1 include Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)’s 2015 historical forecast (before the CLP) that is referenced in the Climate Change Advisory Panel’s Report to Government. The historical forecast is adjusted for ECCC data updates in 2018. Differences between the historical forecast and the CLP reference case include CLP’s projected GHG reductions, differences in economic growth and methodologies used to project emissions. The CLP reference case with potential reductions from innovation
    [Show full text]
  • January 23, 2017 10:00 A.M. Council Chambers Fort Vermilion, Ab
    REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JANUARY 23, 2017 10:00 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS FORT VERMILION, AB P.O. Box 640, 4511-46 Avenue, Fort Vermilion, AB T0H 1N0 P: (780) 927-3718 |Toll Free: 1-877-927-0677 | F: (780) 927-4266 www.mackenziecounty.com | [email protected] MACKENZIE COUNTY REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 23, 2017 10:00 a.m. Fort Vermilion Council Chambers Fort Vermilion, Alberta AGENDA Page CALL TO ORDER: 1. a) Call to Order AGENDA: 2. a) Adoption of Agenda ADOPTION OF 3. a) Minutes of the January 9, 2017 Regular 7 PREVIOUS MINUTES: Council Meeting b) Minutes of the January 11, 2017 Budget Council 17 Meeting DELEGATIONS: 4. a) Randy Affolder, Alliance Assessment (11:00 a.m.) b) Erick Carter – P3 Fire Hall Proposal (IN- CAMERA) (2:30 p.m.) c) d) COUNCIL 5. a) Council Committee Reports (verbal) COMMITTEE REPORTS: b) La Crete Community Streetscape Implementation 25 Committee Meeting Minutes c) Finance Committee Meeting Minutes 31 d) Land Stewardship Committee Meeting Minutes 37 e) f) MACKENZIE COUNTY PAGE 2 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Monday, January 23, 2017 GENERAL 6. a) REPORTS: b) TENDERS: 7. a) Zama City Vegetation Management Project 43 (Tender Close – 2:00 p.m.) b) 2017 Local Gravel Crushing & Stockpiling 47 (Tender Close – 2:00 p.m.) PUBLIC HEARINGS: Public Hearings are scheduled for 1:00 p.m. 8. a) Bylaw 1056-16 Municipal Reserve Partial Closure 51 Plan 992 0893, Block 2, Lot 13 MR (NE 3-106-15- W5M) ADMINISTRATION: 9. a) Species at Risk Committee Terms of Reference 59 b) Fort Vermilion and La Crete Community 67 Streetscape Implementation Committees – Member at Large Appointments c) La Crete Recreation Society – Request for Letter 73 of Support d) Caribou Update (to be presented at the meeting) e) f) AGRICULTURE 10.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of HIGH LEVEL Request for Decision
    TOWN OF HIGH LEVEL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 13, 2020 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers "We will strive to improve our community's quality of life by providing a safe, sustainable environment through planning, communication and cooperation, both locally and regionally." REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers January 13, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. AGENDA Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 2.1 Regular Council Meeting Agenda for 2-4 January 13, 2020. 3. PUBLIC HEARING None. 4. PRESENTATION None. 5. DELEGATIONS 5.1 S/Sgt Denis Delaronde RCMP Report 5.2 Carrie Demkiw Consideration of Early Childhood Development 6-18 Mackenzie Coalition for Childhood Development impacts in municipal decision-making. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6.1 Regular Council Meeting minutes of 20-27 December 9, 2019 7. DELEGATION BUSINESS 7.1 RCMP Report 7.2 Mackenzie Coalition for Childhood Development - Consideration of Early Childhood Development impacts in municipal decision-making report. 8. MAYOR’S REPORT 8.1 Review of the Mayors Report 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 9.1 Committees on which Councillors are 31-32 appointed: 2 Deputy Mayor Langford Reports from various committees on which Councillor Anderson Councillors are appointed. Councillor Forest Councillor Jessiman Councillor Morgan Councillor Welke 10. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 10.1 Actions Resulting from Council/Committee Action List review. 34 Meetings 10.2 Capital Project Status Report Capital Project Status Report review 35 10.3 Report - November 2019 Financial Summary Nov 2019 Financial Summary review. 38-39 11. ADMINISTRATIVE INQUIRIES None. 12. OLD BUSINESS None. 13. NEW BUSINESS 13.1 AUMA President’s Summit on Municipal Council discussion re attending.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Oil Vent Mitigation Options - 2015”
    Environment Canada Environmental Stewardship Branch “Heavy Oil Vent Mitigation Options - 2015” Conducted by: New Paradigm Engineering Ltd. Prepared by: Bruce Peachey, FEIC, FCIC, P.Eng. New Paradigm Engineering Ltd Ph: (780) 448-9195 E-mail: [email protected] Second Edition (Draft) April 30, 2015 Acknowledgements and Disclaimer Acknowledgements The author would like to acknowledge funding provided by Environment Canada, Environmental Stewardship Branch, and the support of a wide range of equipment vendors, producers and other organizations whose staff have contributed to direction, content or comments. This second edition is an upgrade to the initial report for Environment Canada and reflects additional work and content developed by New Paradigm Engineering Ltd. Our intent is to continue to provide in-kind updates, as necessary to keep information current and to reflect any additional information we are made aware of. Disclaimers This document summarizes work done under this contract in support of Environment Canada’s efforts to understand the potential sources of methane venting from primary, or cold, heavy oil operations in Western Canada and the potential mitigation options and barriers to mitigation to reduce those emissions. Any specific technologies, or applications, discussed or referred to, are intended as examples of potential solutions or solution areas, and have not been assessed in detail, or endorsed as to their technical or economic viability. Suggestions made as recommendations for next steps, or follow-up actions are based on the authors’ learnings during the project, but are not intended as specific input to any government policy or actions, which might be considered in crafting future emissions policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Oil Sands and Heavy Oil Deposits
    14 APPENDED DOCUMENTS 14.1 Appendix 1: CANADA'S OIL SANDS AND HEAVY OIL DEPOSITS Vast deposits of viscous bitumen (~350 x 109m3 oil) exist in Alberta and Saskatchewan. These deposits contain enough oil that if only 30% of it were extracted, it could supply the entire needs of North America (United States and Canada) for over 100 years at current consumption levels. The deposits represent "plentiful" oil, but until recently it has not been "cheap" oil. It requires technologically intensive activity and the input of significant amounts of energy to exploit it. Recent developments in technology (horizontal drilling, gravity drainage, unheated simultaneous production of oil and sand, see attached note) have opened the possibility of highly efficient extraction of oil sands at moderate operating cost. For example, the average operating costs for a barrel of heavy oil was CAN$10- 12 in 1989; it was CAN$5-6 in 1996, without correcting for any inflation. This triggered a “mini-boom” in heavy oil development in Alberta and Saskatchewan until the price crash of 1997-1998. However, reasonable prices have triggered more interest in the period 2000-2001, and heavy oil and oil sands development is accelerating. At present, heavy oil production is limited by a restricted refining capacity (upgraders designed specially for the viscous, high sulfur, high heavy metal content crude oil), not by our ability to produce it in the field. Currently (2002), nearly 50% of Canada's oil production comes from the oil sands and the heavy oil producing, high porosity sandstone reservoirs which lie along the Alberta-Saskatchewan border.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Energy Regulator Index of Aer Orders and Approvals Ogs
    INDEX OF AER ORDERS AND APPROVALS OAK OAK FIELD 0659 September 2021 Page 1 of 1 FIELD DESIGNATION 0659 2011-05-01 OAK FIELD POOL DESIGNATION 0659 304001 2009-09-01 BLUESKY A 0659 432001 2010-04-01 ROCK CREEK A 0659 606001 2001-02-01 KISKATINAW A 0659 606002 2001-02-01 KISKATINAW B 0659 606003 2013-07-01 KISKATINAW C 0659 658001 2001-02-01 WABAMUN A ALBERTA ENERGY REGULATOR INDEX OF AER ORDERS AND APPROVALS OGS OGSTON FIELD 0664 September 2021 Page 1 of 2 FIELD DESIGNATION 0664 2012-04-01 OGSTON FIELD POOL DESIGNATION 0664 304001 2010-04-01 BLUESKY A 0664 773502 2008-05-01 KEG RIVER SAND B 0664 797502 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH B 0664 797503 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH C 0664 797504 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH D 0664 797505 2010-04-01 GRANITE WASH E 0664 797506 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH F 0664 797507 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH G 0664 797508 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH H 0664 797509 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH I 0664 797510 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH J 0664 797511 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH K 0664 797512 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH L 0664 797514 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH N 0664 797515 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH O 0664 797516 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH P 0664 797517 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH Q 0664 797518 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH R 0664 797519 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH S 0664 797520 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH T 0664 797521 2015-12-01 GRANITE WASH U 0664 797522 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH V 0664 797523 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH W 0664 797524 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH X 0664 797525 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH Y 0664 797526 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH Z 0664 797527 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH AA 0664 797528 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH BB 0664 797529 2008-06-01 GRANITE WASH CC 0664 797530 2013-07-01 GRANITE WASH DD ALBERTA ENERGY REGULATOR INDEX OF AER ORDERS AND APPROVALS OGS OGSTON FIELD 0664 September 2021 Page 2 of 2 SPACING PATTERN SU 2462 16 Jan 1996 SU 2462A 15 Apr 1998 SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SCHEMES App 9171E 17 Nov 2015 Class II Cardinal Energy Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Oil Sands Industry Quarterly Update
    ALBERTA OIL SANDS INDUSTRY QUARTERLY UPDATE WINTER 2013 Reporting on the period: Sep. 18, 2013 to Dec. 05, 2013 2 ALBERTA OIL SANDS INDUSTRY QUARTERLY UPDATE Canada has the third-largest oil methods. Alberta will continue to rely All about reserves in the world, after Saudi to a greater extent on in situ production Arabia and Venezuela. Of Canada’s in the future, as 80 per cent of the 173 billion barrels of oil reserves, province’s proven bitumen reserves are the oil sands 170 billion barrels are located in too deep underground to recover using Background of an Alberta, and about 168 billion barrels mining methods. are recoverable from bitumen. There are essentially two commercial important global resource This is a resource that has been methods of in situ (Latin for “in developed for decades but is now place,” essentially meaning wells are gaining increased global attention used rather than trucks and shovels). as conventional supplies—so-called In cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), “easy” oil—continue to be depleted. high-pressure steam is injected into The figure of 168 billion barrels TABLE OF CONTENTS directional wells drilled from pads of bitumen represents what is for a period of time, then the steam considered economically recoverable is left to soak in the reservoir for a All about the oil sands with today’s technology, but with period, melting the bitumen, and 02 new technologies, this reserve then the same wells are switched estimate could be significantly into production mode, bringing the increased. In fact, total oil sands Mapping the oil sands bitumen to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment – Joint Review Panel in the MATTER of FRONTIER OIL SANDS PROJECT Teck Resources Limited
    Environmental Assessment – Joint Review Panel IN THE MATTER OF FRONTIER OIL SANDS PROJECT Teck Resources Limited CEAA Reference No. 65505 SUBMISSIONS ON IMPACTS OF THE FRONTIER OIL SANDS PROJECT ON WOOD BUFFALO NATIONAL PARK Filed by: Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) CPAWS Northern Alberta Chapter P.O. Box 52031 Edmonton, AB T6G 2T5 Tel.: (780) 328-3780 Email: [email protected] PART I: INTRODUCTION The Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society is a nationwide charity dedicated to the protection and sustainability of Canada’s public land and water, and ensuring that parks are managed to protect the nature within them. CPAWS Northern Alberta’s role as an organization is to provide landscape-scale, science-based support and advice for the conservation and protection of Alberta’s wilderness. CPAWS Northern Alberta has championed the protection of Alberta’s diverse natural heritage since its establishment in 1968, and regularly collaborates with government, industry, and Indigenous communities on these issues. CPAWS Northern Alberta also strives to educate and bring awareness to Alberta’s residents and visitors about the importance of protecting Alberta’s wilderness. These are the submissions of CPAWS Northern Alberta ("CPAWS") to the Joint Review Panel ("JRP") in relation to the impacts of the Frontier Oil Sands Project (the "Project") on Wood Buffalo National Park ("Park" or “WBNP”). By separate filing on behalf of CPAWS, the Pacific Centre for Environmental Law and Litigation has filed evidence and submissions in relation to the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the Project. In relation to the submissions and evidence contained herein regarding the impacts of the Project on the Park, CPAWS has retained Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Conservation of Wood Buffalo National Park World Heritage Site (Canada)
    December 1st, 2020 REPORT ON THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF WOOD BUFFALO NATIONAL PARK WORLD HERITAGE SITE (CANADA) IN RESPONSE TO: WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE DECISION 43 COM 7B.15 1 DECEMBER 2020 Wood Bison herd in the Peace-Athabasca Delta, Wood Buffalo National Park (Photo: J. McKinnon, Parks Canada) i December 1st, 2020 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Response to the decision of the World Heritage Committee ............................................................................. 3 2.1 Responses to specific requests of Decision 43 COM 7B.15. ................................................................................ 3 2.2 Overview of progress on Action Plan implementation ....................................................................................... 8 3. Other current conservation issues identified by the State Party which may have an impact on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value ..................................................................................................................................... 17 4. Potential major restorations, alterations and/or new construction(s) intended within the property, the buffer zone(s) and/or corridor or other areas, where such developments
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Blueprint of Northern Alberta
    Conservation Blueprint of Northern Alberta Prioritizing areas for protected areas planning Conservation Blueprint of Northern Alberta Conservation Blueprint of Northern Alberta Prioritizing areas for protected areas planning Alison Ronson Danielle Pendlebury Columbian ground squirrel- Danielle Pendlebury © 2015 Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Northern Alberta Conservation Blueprint of Northern Alberta: Prioritizing areas for protected areas planning ISBN: 978-0-9949229-1-5 Published by the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Northern Alberta. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without prior written permission from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Northern Alberta. The maps in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Do not rely on these maps for a precise indication of routes, locations of features, or as a guide to navigation. Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Northern Alberta PO Box 52031, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T5 www.cpawsnab.org Book design by Christy Campos and Danielle Pendlebury Printed in Canada on recycled paper (100% post-consumer waste) certified by the Forest Stewardship Council Acknowledgements CPAWS Northern Alberta is grateful to the Alberta Ecotrust Foundation and TD Friends of the Environment Foundation for funding the development and printing of the Conservation Blueprint of Northern Alberta. CPAWS Northern Alberta would like to thank the following individuals for their invaluable advice, guidance, and support during the development and execution of the Conservation Blueprint project: Dr. Rick Schneider and Dr. Scott Neilson at the University of Alberta, Dr.
    [Show full text]