Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Richard A. Davey, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chairman Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director, MPO Staff MEMORANDUM DATE December 21, 2012 TO David Mohler, Executive Director of Planning Office of Transportation Planning, MassDOT FROM Thomas J. Humphrey, Chief Planner, Transit Service Planning Central Transportation Planning Staff RE MBTA Commuter Rail Passenger Count Results INTRODUCTION This memorandum summarizes the results of passenger counts conducted by CTPS on the MBTA commuter rail system between January and June 2012, and provides recommendations concerning the nature and frequency of future counts. Those counts included the number of passengers boarding and alighting from each train in each direction at each station on each line on one weekday. This level of detail is useful for many planning purposes but is not currently obtainable by any method other than manual counting. The data collected by CTPS were compared to several types of MBTA commuter rail ridership and ridership-related data that have historically been collected on an ongoing basis. The purpose of the comparison was to newly assess the accuracy of those ridership data and to inform recommendations regarding the nature and frequency of future counts. The data compared were: • Monthly ticket and pass sales figures • Daily conductor headcounts • Train Audits from the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company (MBCR) that are more detailed than the conductor headcounts and are performed by conductors several times each year • MBCR peak-period passenger counts conducted at selected stations by consultants to MBCR twice each year1 1 A description of each type of data can be found in Appendix D, Glossary of Terms, and a full explanation of the various types of commuter rail passenger count methodologies can be found in section 6 of this memorandum, Limitations of Other Commuter Rail Ridership Information Sources. State Transportation Building • Ten Park Plaza, Suite 2150 • Boston, MA 02116-3968 Tel. (617) 973-7100 • Fax (617) 973-8855 • TTY (617) 973-7089 • www.bostonmpo.org David Mohler, MassDOT 2 December 21, 2012 The complete CTPS 2012 count results for each commuter rail line are presented in an attached series of maps and tables. To the extent possible, counts were taken on what were believed to be representative days. The boarding and alighting counts were used to calculate loads on each train at each location along each route. In addition to the tables showing boardings, alighting and loads for each train at each station (Appendix A), CTPS produced a set of tables showing estimated all-day trips from each station to each other station on the same line (Appendix B). These estimates were based on the relative importance of each station on each line in total boardings and total alightings on that line, in the same way that trip tables for other services have been produced in the past. Finally, the CTPS 2012 composite one-day counts of passengers on the MBTA commuter rail system are summarized on two maps that show typical inbound weekday boardings and outbound weekday alightings by station (Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively). Analysis of these counts led to the following findings: • 104,384 passengers rode commuter rail in both directions combined each weekday. • Of the total 104,384 weekday riders observed, 38,545, or 36.9%, were on North Side lines and 65,839, or 63.1%, were on South Side lines. • The two-way total ridership by line and branch, from highest to lowest, was: 1. Providence/Stoughton 21,497 2. Newburyport/Rockport 14,003 3. Framingham/Worcester 12,787 4. Franklin 10,080 5. Lowell 9,627 6. Fitchburg 7,924 7. Haverhill 6,991 8. Needham 5,814 9. Kingston/Plymouth 5,513 10. Middleborough/Lakeville 5,006 11. Greenbush 4,353 12. Fairmount 789 • For the commuter rail system overall, 81.2% of inbound ridership was on AM peak trains and 72.8% of outbound ridership was on PM peak trains. • 95.5% of riders were making through trips (to or from North Station, South Station, Back Bay, or other stations in fare Zone 1A) and 4.5% were making interzone trips. These percentages varied among lines, depending partly on the number of intermediate stations and the land use in proximity to these stations (see Appendix C, MBTA Commuter Rail Fare-Zone Map). FIGURE 1 Commuter Rail System Map Typical Inbound Weekday Boardings Winter/Spring 2012 Haverhill 386 Newburyport 538 Bradford 206 Rowley 77 1590 Lowell Lawrence 536 Ipswich 380 786 North Billerica Hamilton/Wenham Rockport 174 Andover 354 476 Wilmington 238 Gloucester 341 Ballardvale 146 287 Fitchburg 857 Anderson / Woburn North Beverly West Gloucester 51 210 211 North Leominster 29 Mishawum North Wilmington 64 Manchester 186 154 Shirley Beverly Farms 118 Reading 797 Prides Crossing 12 249 Ayer 455 Winchester Center Montserrat 208 205 Littleton / Rte 495 Wakefield 484 285 Wedgemere Beverly 1339 681 South Acton Greenwood 126 323 West Concord Salem 1914 414 Brandeis510 / Roberts West Medford Melrose Highlands 178 365 Concord 281 Porter Square Melrose Cedar Park Swampscott 670 171 Lincoln 369 Waltham67 Waverley 135 56 Belmont Lynn 411 7 Silver Hill Wyoming Hill 61 27 Hastings Malden 16 River Works 24 88 Kendal Green West Newton 162 Chelsea 67 Auburndale 160 Newtonville 250 North Station 13 Yawkey 407 BackSouth Bay Station 263 Wellesley Farms 231 Wellesley Hills Needham Heights 254 Ruggles 17 Uphams Corner 48 483 Wellesley Square Needham Center 180 558 Natick Morton Street 64 780 West Natick Fairmount 123 534 Hyde Park JFK/UMASS 2 886 Framingham Readville 141 429 Ashland 513 Hersey Quincy Center 84 248 Bellevue Readville 189 289 Highland 66 Forest Hills Endicott 247 Southborough 416 347 West Roxbury Westborough 463 386 Needham Junction 353 Roslindale VillageDedham Corp. Center 370 80 Islington 92 Braintree North Scituate 336 Grafton 358 Weymouth EastLanding Weymouth / West 464 HinghamNantasket 209 JunctionCohasset 167 253 Route 128 1286 308 Norwood Depot East Braintree 310 Worcester / Union Station 915 Greenbush 405 928 Norwood Central 338 Holbrook/Randolph 270 Windsor Gardens 1125 Canton Junction 9 Plimptonville Montello 321 Canton Center 380 1125 Sharon South Weymouth 413 635 Walpole Stoughton 776 Brockton 290 Abington 572 618 Norfolk 1734 Mansfield Whitman 415 524 Franklin Campello 294 Hanson 382 674 Forge Park / 495 1335 Attleboro Plymouth 21 Halifax 293 916 South Attleboro Bridgewater 550 Kingston 627 1374 Providence 157 TF Green Airport Middleboro / Lakeville 616 FIGURE 2 Commuter Rail System Map Typical Outbound Weekday Alightings Winter/Spring 2012 Haverhill 336 Newburyport 503 Bradford 197 Rowley 70 1492 Lowell Lawrence 537 Ipswich 335 681 North Billerica Hamilton/Wenham Rockport 168 Andover 352 468 Wilmington 253 Gloucester 317 Ballardvale 177 308 Fitchburg 794 Anderson / Woburn North Beverly West Gloucester 40 163 189 North Leominster 26 Mishawum North Wilmington 80 Manchester 144 156 Shirley Beverly Farms 104 Reading 732 Prides Crossing 13 242 Ayer 446 Winchester Center Wakefield 500 Montserrat 198 225 Littleton / Rte 495 270 Wedgemere Beverly 1549 613 South Acton Greenwood 146 347 West Concord Salem 1945 464 Brandeis462 / Roberts West Medford Melrose Highlands 192 335 Concord 209 Porter Square Melrose Cedar Park Swampscott 735 177 Lincoln 377 Waltham95 Waverley 129 92 Belmont Lynn 402 8 Silver Hill Wyoming Hill 98 11 Hastings Malden 26 River Works 31 121 Kendal Green West Newton 215 Chelsea 75 Auburndale 172 Newtonville 287 North Station 19 Yawkey 408 Back Bay 232 Wellesley Farms South Station 250 Wellesley Hills Needham Heights 306 Ruggles 38 Uphams Corner 35 422 Wellesley Square Needham Center 229 538 Natick Morton Street 88 788 West Natick Fairmount 147 400 Hyde Park JFK/UMASS 2 856 Framingham Readville 143 467 Ashland 500 Hersey Readville 212 Quincy Center 134 348 Highland234 Bellevue 109 ForestEndicott Hills 268 Southborough 435 449 West Roxbury Westborough 397 328 Needham Junction 442 Roslindale VillageDedham Corp. Center 382 87 Islington 81 Braintree North Scituate 229 Grafton 360 Weymouth EastLanding Weymouth / West 454 HinghamNantasket 210 JunctionCohasset 167 213 Route 128 1287 277 Norwood Depot East Braintree 364 Worcester / Union Station 841 Greenbush 422 863 Norwood Central 369 Holbrook/Randolph 255 Windsor Gardens 1079 Canton Junction 16 Plimptonville Montello 291 Canton Center 535 1041 Sharon South Weymouth 374 602 Walpole Stoughton 724 Brockton 347 Abington 539 689 Norfolk 1526 Mansfield Whitman 370 596 Franklin Campello 324 Hanson 390 709 Forge Park / 495 1315 Attleboro Plymouth 22 Halifax 301 1110 South Attleboro Bridgewater 526 Kingston 621 1366 Providence 148 TF Green Airport Middleboro / Lakeville 598 David Mohler, MassDOT 5 December 21, 2012 • Imbalances in the inbound and outbound splits of ridership between Back Bay and South Station in the 2012 counts and other counts indicate that significant numbers of passengers who use Back Bay for inbound alightings use South Station for outbound boardings. • The CTPS count results are consistent with estimates based on pass and ticket sales figures and with results of peak-period passenger counts conducted by consultants for MBCR, currently the operator of the MBTA’s commuter rail system. Train Audit report numbers produced by MBCR are much higher than the totals determined by other methods. It can be stated with certainty that actual average ridership is lower than the total indicated by recent Train Audit reports, which indicate about 150,000 if outbound ridership, which is not included in those reports, is assumed to be about the same as inbound Train Audit totals. • Commuter rail passenger counts at the level of detail provided by the 2012 CTPS counts should not need to be repeated on a regular basis. It would, however, be advisable to conduct special counts in conjunction with projects pertaining to specific stations, trains, or routes. This memorandum is divided into the following parts: 1. Reasons for Conducting the CTPS 2012 Commuter Rail Passenger Counts 2.
Recommended publications
  • Capital Investment Plan
    2021 Capital Investment Plan This page intentionally left blank 2021 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................. 1 This format of the Capital Investment Plan provides a text- Letter from Secretary Pollack ............................................... 1 only alternative to the Story Map presentation available Non-Discrimination Protections ............................................ 3 through https://www.mass.gov/cip. For the full version, Glossary of Terms ................................................................ 7 please see the linked website. Introduction ........................................................................ 13 Program Investments by Division.................................... 14 Priorities → Programs → Projects .................................. 15 Funding .............................................................................. 17 Investment Priorities........................................................... 25 Reliability Investments .................................................... 25 Modernization Investments ............................................. 26 Expansion Investments ................................................... 27 Selected Major Investments & Programs ........................ 28 Equity Analysis ................................................................... 30 Public Comment and Engagement ..................................... 33 2021 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN This page intentionally left
    [Show full text]
  • Sudbury Master Plan
    SUDBURY MASTER PLAN BASELINE REPORT VOLUME I Adopted by the Sudbury Planning Board [date placeholder] Sudbury Master Plan BASELINE REPORT Volume 1 February 19, 2021 Prepared for the Sudbury Master Plan Steering Committee Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Community Profile ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Transportation ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Housing ....................................................................................................................................................... 34 Economic Development .............................................................................................................................. 47 Historic and Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 70 Town Services ............................................................................................................................................. 87 Open Space and Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 106 Natural Resources ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Choose Framingham Newsletter
    WELCOME TO THE CHOOSE FRAMINGHAM NEWSLETTER Choose Framingham Newsletter October 31, 2019 - In This Issue: 2nd Annual Oktoberfest Sanofi Genzyme New Facility Halstead Framingham Manufacturer of the Year Qura, Inc. Vacant Storefront Program New Businesses in Downtown Oktoberfest - Photo Credit Itala Keller Downtown Framingham, Inc. Hosts 2nd Annual Oktoberfest On Saturday, October 5, Downtown Framingham, Inc. (DFI) held its 2nd Annual Oktoberfest, which drew a crowd of over 500 people. The event spanned from City Hall Plaza on Concord Street to the Framingham Station parking lot at 417 Waverly Street, which is scheduled to open later this year. Four areas along the route were activated with street performers, activities, food, drinks, and other activities. On City Hall Plaza, attendees were able to shop vendors for soap, coffee, beauty products, jewelry and more, including Viva's Flowers, which Qura, Inc. recently opened at 79 Concord Street in Framingham. Medical Technology Company in Framingham Qura, Inc. is a medical technology company based in Framingham at 1 Grant Street. They are also a founding member of the MetroWest Life Sciences Network. Choose Framingham caught up with the company's Co-Founder, Doug Adams, to find out what's in store for Qura and why they chose Framingham. Tell us a little about Qura, Inc. - what Photo Credit Itala Keller do you do? The parking lot next to Framingham Station became a beer Qura has developed the first active, wireless garden featuring Framingham's own Jack's Abby and Exhibit 'A' and continuous eye pressure sensor for Brewing Company. Teams from major sponsors Loga do glaucoma that collects actionable data in real Marcizio, Wegman's, MutualOne Bank, and TD Bank were on time, facilitating timely and targeted medical site, while Framingham Station cooked up some samples of or surgical intervention for the 80MM people what will be on their menu later this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Providence-Boston-En
    FINAL DRAFT To: RIDOT Date: July 15, 2019 Office of Transit Project #: 72895.05 From: VHB and RKG Associates Re: PVD-BOS Phase I Enhanced Rail Service Economic Impact Analysis 1 PURPOSE To strengthen economic links between Providence and Boston, a short-term initiative is under evaluation that includes the implementation of faster and more frequent rail service between the cities. The Providence-Boston trip time of greater than one hour compares unfavorably with other primary-secondary city pairs on the Northeast Corridor (NEC), though this is primarily due to infrastructure and operational constraints on the NEC. This longer trip time psychologically increases the mental distance between the two markets and hinders economic growth that affects integration of education, healthcare, business, cultural and recreation opportunities between the two cities. This memorandum summarizes the preliminary ridership estimate, traveler benefit assessment, and economic analysis for faster passenger rail service between Providence and Boston along the NEC. This analysis assumes a 45-minute travel time from Providence to Boston with stops in Providence, Route 128, Back Bay, and South Station. Two service scenarios were considered: six round trips per day (two AM peak round trips, two PM peak round trips, two off-peak round trips); and nine round trips per day (three AM peak round trips, three PM peak round trips, three off-peak round trips). 2 CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions were reached: • Enhanced rail service will benefit both cities by increasing the locational value for many types of business activities and for residents, resulting in increased productivity in existing industries and helping to attract new firms.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2004 Transreport Transportation News from the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
    JULY 2004 TRANSREPORT TRANSPORTATION NEWS FROM THE BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Planning for the DNC: Challenges and Solutions A World War on the use of airspace over the site and II “victory on water travel within Boston Harbor. Pase la voz!! Siguiendo con el compro- poster,” Since early March, security experts have miso que la MPO de la región de Boston prominent at been working with state planners and tiene al informar al mayor numero posi- train stations, consultants to schedule detours, restric- ble de personas, acerca de asuntos rela- proclaimed: tions, and closures of air, surface, subsur- cionados con el transporte que pudieran “Millions of face, and water travel modes extending afectarle y dar a conocer las oportu- troops are on from Braintree and Allston to Woburn nidades en todo lo relacionado con la the move . and Saugus. The restrictions, while tem- toma de decisiones, TRANSREPORT está is YOUR trip porary, are significant and numerous, and también disponible en Español. Si estu- necessary?” call upon government, business, and indi- viera interesado en pedir una subscription Sixty years later, planners, pundits, and viduals to completely rethink their travel a nuestro boletin, contacte Daniel Per- the public at large are asking the same choices. alta empleado de la MPO llamando al question as it pertains to the Democratic (671) 973-7116 o mandando un e-mail a National Convention (DNC), which will While the 190,000 vehicles that use I-93 [email protected]. be held at the FleetCenter between July north of the FleetCenter each weekday and the 24,000 weekday travelers going Además de poner a su disposición 26 and July 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Case for Expanding Commuter Rail Service Between Worcester and Boston
    AN INDEPENDENT VOICE FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT CONNECTING THE HEART OF THE COMMONWEALTH WITH THE HUB OF THE UNIVERSE: MAKING THE CASE FOR EXPANDING COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE BETWEEN WORCESTER AND BOSTON Report No. 00-1 January 27, 2000 500 Salisbury Street • Worcester, Massachusetts • 01609-1296 •Telephone: 508/799-7169 Facsimile: 508/799-4720 • www.wrrb.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The MBTA should introduce expanded commuter rail service to Worcester consisting of ten operations in each direction per weekday as promised in the final environmental impact report issued by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs in 1997. That report projected that by 2001 daily weekday inbound ridership at the Worcester Station would reach 414 passengers. The MBTA's most recent ridership audit (February 1999) indicates that current inbound ridership is 917 or more than double the projected number. From these figures (which do not include the number of passengers returning to Worcester), it would appear that the demand warrants additional service. Furthermore, even under the new system of assessing the efficiency of MBTA services that was established in the FY00 State Budget, it is likely that the expanded commuter rail service between Worcester and Boston would be deemed economically feasible. Finally, the amount of commuter parking available and planned in Worcester compares very favorably with other stations on the Framingham line. (Worcester has one parking space available for every 2.2 passengers whereas Framingham has one for every 13.5 passengers.) The main obstacle to expanded service appears to be the limited availability of rolling stock (locomotives and particularly passenger coaches) that expanded rail service would require.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast Rail Project Update NOV 2011
    www.mass.gov/southcoastrail FEIS/FEIR Names Stoughton Route as the Preferred Alternative The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and MassDOT the Corps’ conclusion that there is no practicable released the Final Environmental Impact Statement/ alternative to the Stoughton Electric Alternative with Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/FEIR) on South less environmental impact. The FEIS/FEIR Preface Coast Rail for public review on September 23, 2013. The documents how MassDOT has complied with the FEIS/FEIR is a combined federal and state document requirements of the Certificate issued by the Secretary produced by the Corps summarizing the environmental of Environmental Affairs on the Draft Environmental review of the project. MassDOT adopted the federal Impact Report, and confirms MassDOT’s choice of the document – the FEIS – as the state Final Environmental Stoughton route as the preferred alternative. Impact Report – FEIR – with some additions. As part of the environmental review process, the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) office will accept public A Long Trip comments on the FEIS/FEIR until October 25, 2013. Before 1958, southeastern Massachusetts was As part of the public review, MassDOT is sponsoring served by commuter rail to New Bedford and Fall two public Open Houses to provide information on the River via the Old Colony Railroad System. Trains FEIR. See the box on page 4 for information on the civic left South Station and traveled via Canton Junction engagement and comment process. along the Stoughton Branch railroad. Once service As documented in the FEIS/FEIR, based on extensive was discontinued, commuter rail was only available analysis of environmental benefits and impacts, along the Boston-Providence Shore Line and the Old MassDOT has identified the Stoughton route as the Colony Middleborough Line, with no easy access for Commonwealth’s preferred alternative for the South commuters from Taunton, Fall River or New Bedford.
    [Show full text]
  • Parking Facilities Assessment And
    DOWNTOWN MALDEN PARKING FACILITIES ASSESSMENT, City of Malden/MRA PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS STUDY INTRODUCTION The City of Malden and the Malden Redevelopment Authority are taking significant actions to improve diversity of uses and activate the downtown area. In the late 1960s/early 1970s, the City undertook a major urban renewal program that dramatically altered the central business district. The program included removal of hundreds of residential units and other structures, and constructed a new Government Center building that changed traffic patterns on Pleasant Street and diverted traffic volumes around the Central Business District (CBD). Two new parking garages (CBD and Jackson Street) were constructed to replace lost parking in the downtown as well as to support the redevelopment. The MBTA extended its Orange Line heavy rapid transit service to Malden Center and beyond, and also established a commuter rail station at Malden Center with at-grade pedestrian connections to downtown Malden and limited transit related commuter parking capacity. As part of a new private development, the Government Center building was removed, reconnecting Pleasant Street and improving traffic and pedestrian/bicyclist circulation through the downtown. Redevelopment in Malden is now focused on transportation oriented development (TOD), providing mixed use (residential, business, commercial, and leisure space) all within a comfortable walking distance of the Malden Center Station. The signs of new development are abundant, and high density housing, new restaurants, and other development is creating a new downtown that will thrive as a result of these public investments and supportive public policy. Malden is also a transit hub for the Encore Boston Harbor resort and casino located just over 2 miles from Malden Center Station.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Capital Investment Program Appendix A
    2021 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN APPENDIX A: INVESTMENT DETAILS Appendix A: Investment Details This section provides the lists of investments contained within this CIP. The information within each column is described below: • Location – where the investment is located • Project ID – the Division specific ID that uniquely identifies each investment • Project name – the name of the investment and a brief description • Priority – the capital priority that the investment addresses • Program – the program from which the investment is made • Score – the score of the investment (reliability investments are not scored) • Total cost – the total cost of the investment • Prior years – the spending on the investment that pre-dates the plan update • FY 2021 – the spending estimated to occur in fiscal year 2021 • Post FY 2021 – the estimated spending to occur post fiscal year 2021 for the project APPENDIX A: INVESTMENT DETAILS 2021 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN ii Aeronautics 2021 Capital Investment Plan Total Prior Years 2021 After 2021 Location Division ID Priority Program Project Description Score $M $M $M $M Barnstable Municipal Aeronautics | Airport AE21000002 1 | Reliability SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS 1 $0.72 $0.00 $0.72 $0.00 Airport capital improvement Aeronautics | Airport MEPA/NEPA/CCC FOR MASTER PLAN AE21000003 1 | Reliability 1 $0.80 $0.53 $0.28 $0.00 capital improvement IMPROVEMENTS Aeronautics | Airport AE21000023 1 | Reliability AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1 $1.12 $0.00 $0.05 $1.07 capital improvement Aeronautics | Airport PURCHASE SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Pedestrian and Bicyclist Access to Selected Transit Stations
    Improving Pedestrian and Bicyclist Access to Selected Transit Stations A report produced by the Central Transportation Planning Staff for the Massachusetts Highway Department and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Improving Pedestrian and Bicyclist Access to Selected Transit Stations Author Lourenço Dantas Contributors Kenneth Dumas Heather Ostertog Karl Quackenbush Graphics and Photography Kenneth Dumas Cover Design Jane M. Gillis The preparation of this document was supported by the Massachusetts Highway Department, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, and Federal Highway Administration through MassHighway Agreements SPR 33097 and 3C PL 33101 and MBTA contracts. Central Transportation Planning Staff Directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization. The MPO is composed of state and regional agencies and authorities, and local governments. September 2005 ABSTRACT This study identifies relatively low-cost, quick-implementation measures that can significantly improve pedestrian and bicyclist access at six locations in the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority system: Ayer Station (commuter rail); Boston College Branch (B Line) stops, Boston College Station to Chestnut Hill Avenue (Green Line); Cleveland Circle and Reservoir stops (Green Line, C and D); Forest Hills Station (Orange Line, commuter rail, and bus); Malden Center Station (Orange Line, commuter rail, and bus); and Mansfield Station (commuter rail and bus). Detailed in the report are improvements to both station property and surrounding areas that would eliminate hazards for bicyclists and pedestrians, increase ease of access to the station from surrounding neighborhoods for those users, or otherwise enhance the attractiveness of the station for access by foot or bicycle. The report also includes a summary that describes the types of issues encountered and provides general recommendations.
    [Show full text]