Answering the Riddle of the Cooks Tale
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chapter 7 Answering the Riddle of the Cooks Tale The murky case of the Cook s Tale presents a panoply of various issues relevant to the discussion of the Canterbury Tales as a textually dynamic work with a history ofinteraction. However, unlike the other cases discussed in the first several chapters, the fragmented state of the tale, the cloudiness of Chaucer's role and intentions, and the sheer variety of reader responses to the fragmented tale, both in the criticism and in the textual history of the Canterbury Tales, make the case of the Cook:~ Tale unique in many ways. No other fragmented part ofthe Tales resulted in quite the range and number of responses as the Cooks Tale. For instance, the "spurious links" are only in a small number of manuscripts, which are all from the fifteenth century. Written around 1422, Lydgate's Siege ofThebes and its Prologue are in only five manuscripts ofthe Canterbury Tales. The Canterbury Interlude and the Tale of8eryn are only in the Northumberland manuscript. The fifteenth-century orthodox Ploughman s Tale is only in Christ Church 152. The sixteenth-century proto-Protestant Plowman sTale is not found in any medieval manuscript but in one early modern manuscript and several printed editions. However, all but eight ofthe fifty or so complete manuscripts ofthe Canterbury Tales have something to say about the Cook s Tale. What is more, the scribes of 33 of the manuscripts interact in some explicit way, either through paratextual glossing or additional text, with the fragmented tale, imaginatively reshaping the path of the CookS Tale. l Recalling the challenge and contestation of text-based games such as a riddle, David Lorenzo Boyd states, "the narrative [of the Cooks Tale] was the focus ofmuch fifteenth-century editorial creativity, for it presented a gap, an irresistible challenge with which the book industry then had to contend."2 The challenge the narrative gap poses remains, and to this day readers continue to fill in the gaps in narratively and textually unique ways. At the end of the first fragment or tale group "a" in the Canterbury Tales, the Cook promises in his Prologue to tell a "litel jape" (I. 4329) in the same manner as the Reeve and the Miller. However, he only begins to tell his tale. The canonical text ofthe Cook s Tale begins by introducing the raucous and unsavory apprentice victualer known as Perkyn the Revel our, the prototypical party animal and wedding crasher, who "haunteth dys, riot, or paramour" (I. 4392). Perkyn shirks most of [n addition to all the cases in which the scribe explicitly writes something that interacts with the text, I also include the Ellesmere manuscript in which the scribe makes no comment but leaves part of a page and a whole leaf blank before the next tale. 2 David Lorenzo Boyd, "Social Texts: Bodley 686 and the Politics of the Cook's Tale," in Reading From the Margins: Textual Studies, Chaucer, and Medieval Literature, ed. Seth Lerer (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1996),85. 142 Playing the Canterbury Tales Answering the Riddle o/the Cook's Tale 143 his apprenticeship duties and should never have been given his "acquitance" to the fragmented tale and the narratives of explanation that seek to answer the (i.e., certificate of successful apprenticeship completion) by the master victualer, unanswerable question: why does the Cook's Tale end the way it does? The CookS but the master decides to send Perkyn on his way so he doesn't rub off on the rest Tale, for the past 600 years, has been an undecipherable riddle that many have of the servants in the household. The master bids Perkyn to go with "sorwe and tried to answer. with mischance" (1. 4412), and Perkyn leaves to take up residence with a friend of If it was indeed supposed to have an ending, two endings seem realistically his in what seems to be a brothel. With that, the tale ends abruptly right as it begins possible based on the potential narrative: either Perkyn continues his "riotous" and to head down a rather seedy path with the lines, rebellious ways in a comedy, or something will happen to Perkyn that will bring the tale to a didactic and moralized conclusion. Regardless of where the tale was Anon he sente his bed and his array supposed to go, various "involved " as Rust might describe them, have Unto a compeer ofhis owene sort, resolved the abrupt ending in several unique ways. As a riddle, a text-based game That lovede and revel, and disport, of sorts, the hasty ending of the tale similarly demands solution. Since scribes And hadde a wyf that heeld for contenance began copying the Tales, such sudden stops to tales have caused readers to react in 1\ shoooe. and for hir sustenance. (I. a variety of different ways ranging from silence, to invented interruptions, to the after the introduction of this "wyf' and her career as a prostitute, the utter revision of the tale through user-created input. Some of these user-created tale simply ends without a sense of closure, making it unpalatable to our modern inputs were original; some were appropriated from other, often unknown, sources sense of an ending, but also apparently insufficient for a number of late medieval and added to the Canterbury story canon. writerly readers. New-media theorist Nick Montfort cites the riddle as the ancestor to The tale quite clearly ends with the potential for much more narrative and no contemporary forms of interactive fiction. He states, "the riddle is not only the sense ofcompleteness, but it is not particularly evident why it ends where it does. most important early ancestor of interactive fiction but also an extremely valuable Why leave a tale like the Cook's so clearly unfinished? There has been no shortage figure for understanding it, perhaps the most directly useful figure in considering of explanations. It is possible that it was getting too dirty, so either Chaucer or the aesthetics and poetics ofform today."5 Riddles are by definition unfinished texts some censoring scribe stopped the tale in its tracks. It could be too that Chaucer that demand interaction and subsequently completion. They propose questions changed his mind after he had already begun composing the tale, deciding that that readers then answer. I propose that the following riddle-like questions are in there was already too much raucous, bawdy comedy with the Miller and Reeve play with the unfinished Cook:s Tale: For the critics, the question is what would preceding the Cook and not enough serious didacticism. He would have rewritten Chaucer want? For the early scribes, the question was how do we deal with this a new tale, but he never got around to it. It is also possible that Chaucer never got incomplete text? For the present discussion, the question is how have scribes and around to writing the ending of the tale because he had not yet decided whether critics interacted with and reacted to Chaucer:S potential narrative with new texts, to continue down the seedy path of revelry, drunkenness, and prostitution or bring imaginative explanations, or different contexts? In the following sections, I explore the tale and its main character to a moral end for the edification of the reader. Of the variety of interactive responses and solutions to the potential narrative of the course, the Cook's promise of a "jape that fil in oure citee" might indicate that the Cook s Tale, including the range ofscribal actions that negotiated the narrative gap tale will be a fabliau because the Cook uses the same terms when he describes and the critics' own narratives explaining Chaucer's silence, and the tenuous place the events of the Reeve s Tale as a "jape of malice in the derk" (I. 4343, 4338). inside and outside the Chaucer canon ofthe seemingly ubiquitous Tale ofGamelyn However, as A.C. Spearing points out, Chaucer's plans for his narrative seem to as the conclusion to the Cook's Tale. have been in a constant state offlux in all ofhis literary works.3 Because Chaucer's VA. Kolve, discussing the Cook:5 Tale in Chaucer and the Imagery of intentions remain in flux, so too must the Cook's. On the other hand, Chaucer 'rative, states, "[w]e cannot hope to finish what Chaucer left incomplete, or might have had an ending in mind but stopped because of some interrupting life to resolve the problems he had not yet solved."6 Yet we have been doing just that events such as sickness or death. There is also the proto-postmodern possibility kind of interactive solving and narrative shaping for centuries through involved, that, though it ends fragmented, it ends exactly how Chaucer wanted it to end. ergodic textual experiences first in the Tales' transmission and now in the criticism Yet these are all only imaginative conjectures with little basis in the discernable that imagines what became of Chaucer's lost tale. Beginning with the earliest evidence of the manuscripts. They are all possible, but none proves particularly examples, in the manuscripts containing the Cook :\. Tale there are at least four more likely than the other. However, this plethora of potential explanations for the tale ends fragmented fuels the new narratives that have been attached Rust, Imaginary Worlds, 9. Montfort, 1Wisry Little Passages, 37. Spearing, "Afterlife of the Canterbury Tales." See Chapter 4. VA. Kolve, Chaucer and the Imagery o/Narrative (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1984),257. 144 Playing the Canterbury Tales Answering the Riddle ofthe Cook's Tale 145 types of scribal responses to the fragmented tale with some variation: 1) Silence.