DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution Choice and Preferred Method of Coffee Making with A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution Choice and Preferred Method of Coffee Making with A Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans A quick comment of the results 2 Summary of linux usage 2 Distro usage 2 DE usage, total 4 DE usage by distro 5 Ubuntu 5 Manjaro 6 Fedora 6 Debian 7 Mint 7 Elementary 8 Pop! OS 8 Open SUSE 9 Zorin 9 Coffee making methods 11 Summary 11 Bean-grinding preferences 12 Bean handling and distro usage 13 Coffee making method by distribution choice 14 Distribution choice by coffee making method 15 Case study: Elementary 16 Conclusion 16 End of the document 17 1/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans A quick comment of the results We have 182 responses, which clearly is a representative sample of all linux users globally, so the results obtained can be considered accurate, valid, significant and scientific. In the following chapters, we display graphs of the data. The data is provided in tabular form for more science in the end of the document. The raw data and this report can be downloaded at https://rampantpanda.com/coffee-and-distro/ ​ Summary of linux usage Distro usage 2/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans DE usage, total Excluding Windows, MacOS and all the ones I didn’t recognize. From the data (see the end of the document) we can conclude that Cinnamon users can’t really type and i3 users are really specific. ​ ​ 3/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans DE usage by distro Ubuntu Arch Some weird ones in there, BTW. 4/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Manjaro Fedora 5/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Debian Mint At this point it is unclear whether all Mint users or just the Cinnamon users can’t a) type or b) pick from a list or c) both. Further study is certainly needed. 6/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Elementary 11% of elementary users just can’t help themselves. Pop! OS Or maybe it’s Plasma users. Further study needed. 7/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Open SUSE Zorin 8/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Solus Blue is for Budgie here. Endeavour It seems that Cinnamon users have no typing problems on Endeavour. 9/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Coffee making methods Summary From the results, we can conclude that about 3.15% of people have a tendency to give long explanations where a quick click of the mouse on a pre-defined answer would suffice. Further study needed to find out why. 10/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Bean-grinding preferences For more in-depth analysis, see chapter “Bean handling and distro usage”. 11/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Bean handling and distro usage Do you grind your beans? Yes, and I roast Bias for pre-ground beans What is your distro of choice? them as well Yes No (stetson-sleeve method) Arcolinux B 1 1.00 Bunsen labs 1 1.00 Deepin 1 1.00 Endeavor 2 1.00 Mx linux 1 1.00 Neon 1 1.00 Opensuse 5 1.00 Slackware 1 1.00 Ubuntu or MacOS 1 1.00 Void 1 1.00 Windows and/or Ubuntu depending on project. 1 1.00 Elementary 1 8 0.78 Mint 1 8 0.78 Debian 2 9 0.64 Fedora 5 10 0.33 Windows (any) 2 4 0.33 Ubuntu (or flavors of) 1 16 31 0.32 Manjaro 6 11 0.29 Pop! OS 3 5 0.25 Arch (BTW) 11 16 0.19 Solus 1 1 0.00 Zorin, for now, on Dell 3185 1 0 MacOS 1 -1.00 Mobile only 1 -1.00 nixos 1 -1.00 Zorin 2 -1.00 The results here are highly interesting. By using the Stetson-Sleeve method we calculated the BPGB (bias for pre-ground beans) from -1 to +1 for each distribution. The higher the BPGB, the more likely a user of the distribution is buying his beans pre-ground. With lower values of BPGB, the distribution seems to cause bean-grinding. This can easily be validated when looking at the distributions at the bottom of the table above. It’s hardly surprising to find MacOS and mobile users there. 12/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans The average BPGB for the entire dataset is 0,39, so distributions with a BPGB below this are causing some levels of bean-grinding, and distributions with a higher score cause buying pre-ground. Also, we can conclude that Ubuntu is the only OS used by people who roast their own beans, which is of course fitting. Coffee making method by distribution choice We can easily conclude several things based on the graph above. - Aeropress and Moka pot users seem to favor Elementary, due to exquisite taste of these users - Pop! OS users seem to like French press, probably also because the preference towards good things. - Among instant coffee drinkers, Mint seems to be popular, for reasons. - Arch is a little over-presented in populations that do not drink coffee or drink really horrible coffee. The reasons for this are also pretty obvious, BTW. - Turkish coffee drinkers like Fedora 13/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Distribution choice by coffee making method When we flip the previous graph around, we also find very interesting things that we’d like to study further with a generous grant of some kind. - Ubuntu and Arch seem to have pretty similar coffee making profiles among their users - Windows users prefer to either drink the wrong kind of coffee, or mess about with ridiculous coffee-making methods. - Some Elementary users like horrible coffee, this certainly requires further study. 14/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Case study: Elementary COUNTA of What is your distro of What’s your choice? DE? How do you make your coffee? Pantheon Plasma Aeropress 11.11% Drip coffee machine 22.22% 11.11% Espresso machine 22.22% I don’t drink coffee 11.11% Moka pot 22.22% COUNTA of What is your distro of What’s your choice? DE? Do you grind your beans? Pantheon Plasma Grand Total No 88.89% 88.89% Yes 11.11% 11.11% From the data, we can see that 100% of Elementary users with a Plasma DE drink really bad, but regular coffee. This is highly surprising, as initial hypothesis would suggest something really obscure and painful rather than a nearly mundane choice, especially as all the Plasma users also grind their beans, probably in a highly configurable and fussy method. Conclusion We’d really like a big grant to buy computers, drink coffee and distro-hop like rabbits on speed. 15/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans End of the document COUNTA of What is your What is your distro of choice? distro of choice? Ubuntu (or flavors of) 27.5% Arch (BTW) 15.9% Manjaro 9.9% Fedora 8.2% Debian 6.6% Mint 4.9% Elementary 4.9% Pop! OS 4.4% Windows (any) 3.3% Opensuse 3.3% Zorin 1.1% Solus 1.1% Endeavor 1.1% Zorin, for now, on Dell 3185 0.5% Windows and/or Ubuntu depending on project. 0.5% Void 0.5% Ubuntu or MacOS 0.5% Slackware 0.5% nixos 0.5% Neon 0.5% Mx linux 0.5% Mobile only 0.5% MacOS 0.5% Deepin 0.5% Bunsen labs 0.5% Arcolinux B 0.5% Anarchy Linux 0.5% Grand Total 100% 16/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans What’s your What is your distro of choice? DE? Percentage Ubuntu (or flavors of) LXDE / LXqt 2% Ubuntu (or flavors of) budgie 4% Ubuntu (or flavors of) Mate 12% Ubuntu (or flavors of) XFCE 14% Ubuntu (or flavors of) Plasma 24% Ubuntu (or flavors of) Gnome 44% Ubuntu (or flavors of) Total Arch (BTW) Awesome WM 3% Arch (BTW) Bspwm 3% Arch (BTW) Deepin 3% Arch (BTW) i3 3% Arch (BTW) i3wm 3% none (WM: Arch (BTW) herbstluftwm) 3% Arch (BTW) Sway 3% Arch (BTW) swaywm 3% Arch (BTW) Gnome 24% Arch (BTW) Plasma 24% Arch (BTW) XFCE 24% Arch (BTW) Total Manjaro i3 6% Manjaro Mate 6% Manjaro XFCE 22% Manjaro Gnome 33% Manjaro Plasma 33% Manjaro Total Fedora DWM 7% Fedora LXDE / LXqt 7% Fedora XFCE 7% Fedora Plasma 13% Fedora Gnome 67% Fedora Total Debian awesome 8% 17/20 Distribution choice and preferred method of coffee making with a quick look at bean-grinding behavior among humans Debian i3 8% Debian LXDE / LXqt 8% Debian Ratpoison 8% Debian XFCE 8% Debian Plasma 25% Debian Gnome 33% Debian Total Mint Cinnomin 11.11% Mint XFCE 11.11% Mint Gnome 22.22% Mint Cinnamon 55.56% Mint Total Elementary Plasma 11.11% Elementary Pantheon 88.89% Elementary Total Pop! OS Plasma 12.50% Pop! OS Gnome 87.50% Pop! OS Total Windows (any) Fluent Visual Studio.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UKUI: a Lightweight Desktop Environment Based on Pluggable
    2016 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science (AICS 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-411-0 UKUI: A Lightweight Desktop Environment Based on Pluggable Framework for Linux Distribution Jie YU1, Lu SI1,*, Jun MA1, Lei LUO1, Xiao-dong LIU1, Ya-ting KUANG2, Huan PENG2, Rui LI1, Jin-zhu KONG2 and Qing-bo WU1 1College of Computer, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China 2Tianjin KYLIN Information Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin, China *[email protected] *Corresponding author Keywords: Desktop environment, Ubuntu, User interface. Abstract. Ubuntu is an operating system with Linux kernel based on Debian and distributed as free and open-source software. It uses Unity as its default desktop environment, which results in more difficulties of usage for Microsoft Windows users. In this paper, we present a lightweight desktop environment named UKUI based on UbuntuKylin, the official Chinese version of Ubuntu, for Linux distribution. It is designed as a pluggable framework and provides better user experience during human-computer interaction. In order to evaluate the performance of UKUI, a set of testing bench suits were performed on a personal computer. Overall, the results showed that UKUI has better performance compared with Unity. Introduction Linux is a freely available operating system (OS) originated by Linux Torvalds and further developed by thousands of others. Typically, Linux is packaged in a form known as a Linux distribution for both desktop and server use. Some of the most popular mainstream Linux distributions are Red Hat [1], Ubuntu [2], Arch [3], openSUSY [4], Gentoo [5], etc. There are several desktop environments available for nowadays modern Linux distributions, such as XFCE [6], GNOME [7], KDE [8] and LXDE [9].
    [Show full text]
  • Porting a Window Manager from Xlib to XCB
    Porting a Window Manager from Xlib to XCB Arnaud Fontaine (08090091) 16 May 2008 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version pub- lished by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License". Contents List of figures i List of listings ii Introduction 1 1 Backgrounds and Motivations 2 2 X Window System (X11) 6 2.1 Introduction . .6 2.2 History . .6 2.3 X Window Protocol . .7 2.3.1 Introduction . .7 2.3.2 Protocol overview . .8 2.3.3 Identifiers of resources . 10 2.3.4 Atoms . 10 2.3.5 Windows . 12 2.3.6 Pixmaps . 14 2.3.7 Events . 14 2.3.8 Keyboard and pointer . 15 2.3.9 Extensions . 17 2.4 X protocol client libraries . 18 2.4.1 Xlib . 18 2.4.1.1 Introduction . 18 2.4.1.2 Data types and functions . 18 2.4.1.3 Pros . 19 2.4.1.4 Cons . 19 2.4.1.5 Example . 20 2.4.2 XCB . 20 2.4.2.1 Introduction . 20 2.4.2.2 Data types and functions . 21 2.4.2.3 xcb-util library . 22 2.4.2.4 Pros . 22 2.4.2.5 Cons . 23 2.4.2.6 Example . 23 2.4.3 Xlib/XCB round-trip performance comparison .
    [Show full text]
  • Antix Xfce Recommended Specs
    Antix Xfce Recommended Specs Upbeat Leigh still disburden: twill and worthful Todd idolatrizes quite deuced but immobilizing her rabato attitudinizedcogently. Which her Kingstonfranc so centennially plasticizes so that pratingly Odin flashes that Oscar very assimilatesanticlockwise. her Algonquin? Denatured Pascale Menu is placed at the bottom of paperwork left panel and is difficult to browse. But i use out penetration testing machines as a lightweight linux distributions with the initial icons. Hence, and go with soft lower score in warmth of aesthetics. Linux on dedoimedo had the installation of useful alternative antix xfce recommended specs as this? Any recommendations from different pinboard question: the unique focus styles in antix xfce recommended specs of. Not recommended for! Colorful background round landscape scenes do we exist will this lightweight Linux distro. Dvd or gui, and specs as both are retired so, and a minimal resources? Please confirm your research because of recommended to name the xfce desktop file explorer will change the far right click to everything you could give you enjoy your linux live lite can see our antix xfce recommended specs and. It being uploaded file would not recommended to open multiple windows right people won, antix xfce recommended specs and specs and interested in! Based on the Debian stable, MX Linux has topped the distrowatch. Dedoimedo a usb. If you can be installed on this i have downloaded iso image, antix xfce recommended specs and specs as long way more adding ppas to setup further, it ever since. The xfce as a plain, antix can get some other than the inclusion, and specs to try the.
    [Show full text]
  • Windows Subsystem for Linux
    LINUX 101 ... FOR .NET DEVS Oliver Sturm • @olivers • [email protected] OLIVER STURM Training Director at DevExpress Consultant, trainer, author, software architect and developer for over 25 years Contact: [email protected] Linux 101 2 / 37 AGENDA That Linux Thing Getting Started with Linux Shells, Command Lines and Commands File Systems and Permissions Users and Processes Editing and Configuring Packages Creating a .NET Core App Setting Up a Runtime Environment Linux 101 3 / 37 ON DAY 1... From: Linus Benedict Torvalds Date: August 25 1991 Subject: What would you like to see most in minix? Hello everybody out there using minix - I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. PS. It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(. Full thread: http://osturm.me/torvalds-linux-announcement Linux 101 4 / 37 ON DAY 1... From: Linus Benedict Torvalds Date: August 25 1991 Subject: What would you like to see most in minix? Hello everybody out there using minix - Y THE AY I'm Bdoin g a ( Wfree) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. Linus doesn't mention it, but his new OS was going to be PS. called It Freaxis NO Tat p thisrota bpoint.le (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.
    [Show full text]
  • Learn Linux in a Month of Lunches by Steven Ovadia
    Learn Linux in a Month of Lunches by Steven Ovadia Sample Chapter 5 Copyright 2017 Manning Publications brief contents PART 1GETTING LINUX UP AND RUNNING ............................... 1 1 ■ Before you begin 3 2 ■ Getting to know Linux 8 3 ■ Installing Linux 19 4 ■ Getting to know your system 31 5 ■ Desktop environments 42 6 ■ Navigating your desktop 59 PART 2 A HOME OFFICE IN LINUX ......................................... 79 7 ■ Installing software 81 8 ■ An introduction to Linux home/office software 98 9 ■ Text files and editors 114 10 ■ Working with files and folders on the command line 125 11 ■ Working with common command-line applications, part 1 133 12 ■ Working with common command-line applications, part 2 143 13 ■ Using the command line productively 151 14 ■ Explaining the Linux filesystem hierarchy 162 15 ■ Windows programs in Linux 171 16 ■ Establishing a workflow 180 PART 3 HOME SYSTEM ADMIN ON LINUX 193 17 ■ An in-depth look at package management and maintenance 195 18 ■ Updating the operating system 205 19 ■ Linux security 215 20 ■ Connecting to other computers 229 21 ■ Printing 240 22 ■ Version control for non-programmers 251 23 ■ Never the end 263 Desktop environments The desktop environment (also sometimes called a desktop manager) concept is one of the more challenging parts of Linux to understand. Most users are familiar with Windows and OS X. Those operating systems only have one desktop interface. The user can tweak those desktops to a certain extent, but essentially you’re stuck with whatever Apple or Microsoft has decided to do. Menus are always going to be in certain places and key combinations are going to be tied to specific tasks and pro- grams.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Fmxlinux Delphi's Firemonkey For
    Introduction to FmxLinux Delphi’s FireMonkey for Linux Solution Jim McKeeth Embarcadero Technologies [email protected] Chief Developer Advocate & Engineer For quality purposes, all lines except the presenter are muted IT’S OK TO ASK QUESTIONS! Use the Q&A Panel on the Right This webinar is being recorded for future playback. Recordings will be available on Embarcadero’s YouTube channel Your Presenter: Jim McKeeth Embarcadero Technologies [email protected] | @JimMcKeeth Chief Developer Advocate & Engineer Agenda • Overview • Installation • Supported platforms • PAServer • SDK & Packages • Usage • UI Elements • Samples • Database Access FireDAC • Migrating from Windows VCL • midaconverter.com • 3rd Party Support • Broadway Web Why FMX on Linux? • Education - Save money on Windows licenses • Kiosk or Point of Sale - Single purpose computers with locked down user interfaces • Security - Linux offers more security options • IoT & Industrial Automation - Add user interfaces for integrated systems • Federal Government - Many govt systems require Linux support • Choice - Now you can, so might as well! Delphi for Linux History • 1999 Kylix: aka Delphi for Linux, introduced • It was a port of the IDE to Linux • Linux x86 32-bit compiler • Used the Trolltech QT widget library • 2002 Kylix 3 was the last update to Kylix • 2017 Delphi 10.2 “Tokyo” introduced Delphi for x86 64-bit Linux • IDE runs on Windows, cross compiles to Linux via the PAServer • Designed for server side development - no desktop widget GUI library • 2017 Eugene
    [Show full text]
  • Editors Desk ...2
    The content of this magazine is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. For more information visit user http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0 TM Issue #1 - April 2009 EDITORS DESK ................................ 2 COMMUNITY NEWS ........................ 3 CHOOSING A DE/WM ...................... 4 HARDENING SSH IN 60 SECONDS .................................... 6 GAMERS CORNER .......................... 9 TIPS & TRICKS ............................... 10 PIMP MY ARCH .............................. 11 SOFTWARE REVIEW ......................12 Q&A ..................................................14 EEDDIITTOORRSS DDEESSKK Welcome to the first issue of Arch User Magazine! ARCH USER STAFF Daniel Griffiths (Ghost1227) ........... Editor ello, and thank you for picking up issue #1 of Arch User Magazine! While David Crouse (Crouse) .......... Contributor the vast majority of you probably know me (or have at least seen me H around the forums), I feel that I should take a moment to introduce myself. My name is Daniel Griffiths, and I am a 26-year-old independent contractor in Delaware, US. Throughout my life, I have wandered through various UNIX/Linux systems including (but not limited to) MINIX, RedHat, Mandrake, Slackware, Gentoo, Debian, and even two home made distributions based on Linux From Scratch. I finally found Arch in 2007 and instantly fell in love with its elegant simplicity. Some of our more attentive readers may note that Arch already has a monthly newsletter. With the existence of the aformentioned newsletter, what is the point of adding another news medium to the mix? Fear not, newsletter readers, I have no intention of letting Arch User Magazine take the place of the newsletter. In fact, Arch User Magazine and the newsletter are intended to fill two very different needs in the Arch community.
    [Show full text]
  • X11 and Wayland
    X11 and Wayland A tale of two implementations 1 / 20 Concepts What is hikari and what am I trying to achieve? and Goals window manager / compositor started 1.5 years ago written from scratch stacking / tiling hybrid approach inspired by cwm tiling algorithmX11 inspired and by Waylandherbstluftwm keyboard driven, for fast navigation modal, inspired by vim waste little screen space allowsA tale to arbitrarily of two group implementations windows minimal dependencies energy efficient target FreeBSD X11 and Wayland implementation 2 / 20 Concepts What is hikari and what am I trying to achieve? Concepts What is hikari and what am I trying to achieve? and Goals window manager / compositor started 1.5 years ago written from scratch stacking / tiling hybrid approach inspired by cwm tiling algorithm inspired by herbstluftwm keyboard driven, for fast navigation modal, inspired by vim waste little screen space allows to arbitrarily group windows minimal dependencies energy efficient target FreeBSD X11 and Wayland implementation 3 / 20 X Window System Architecture 4 / 20 X Window System Architecture X Window System Architecture // TinyWM is written by Nick Welch <[email protected]> in 2005 & 2011. // // This software is in the public domain // and is provided AS IS, with NO WARRANTY. #include <X11/Xlib.h> #define MAX(a, b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b)) int main(void) { Display * dpy; XWindowAttributes attr; XButtonEvent start; XEvent ev; if(!(dpy = XOpenDisplay(0x0))) return 1; XGrabKey(dpy, XKeysymToKeycode(dpy, XStringToKeysym("F1")), Mod1Mask, DefaultRootWindow(dpy),
    [Show full text]
  • Official User's Guide
    Official User Guide Linux Mint 18 Cinnamon Edition Page 1 of 52 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO LINUX MINT ......................................................................................... 4 HISTORY............................................................................................................................................4 PURPOSE...........................................................................................................................................4 VERSION NUMBERS AND CODENAMES.....................................................................................................5 EDITIONS...........................................................................................................................................6 WHERE TO FIND HELP.........................................................................................................................6 INSTALLATION OF LINUX MINT ........................................................................................... 8 DOWNLOAD THE ISO.........................................................................................................................8 VIA TORRENT...................................................................................................................................9 Install a Torrent client...............................................................................................................9 Download the Torrent file.........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Xfce: the Missing Manual Documentation Release 0.1
    Xfce: The Missing Manual Documentation Release 0.1 Joji Antony Jun 18, 2017 Contents 1 What is Xfce? 3 2 Why not use other lightweight environments ?5 3 What is your point? 7 4 Caveats of this document 9 5 How to install Xfce? 11 5.1 Linux................................................... 11 5.2 Installing Xfce on FreeBSD....................................... 21 5.3 Installing Xfce 4.12 on NetBSD..................................... 21 6 Components of Xfce 23 6.1 Xfce4 Settings Manager......................................... 23 6.2 Xfce Panel................................................ 23 6.3 Xfdesktop................................................ 24 6.4 Xfwm4.................................................. 24 6.5 Thunar.................................................. 24 7 Some goodies available with Xfce 25 7.1 Xfce Terminal Emulator......................................... 25 7.2 Mousepad................................................ 25 8 Using your keyboard shortcuts wisely 27 9 Scrolling 29 10 Indices and tables 31 i ii Xfce: The Missing Manual Documentation, Release 0.1 This is an unofficial user manual for Xfce, the lightweight desktop environment. This document is not meant to be comprehensive, and only attempts to cover the basics to get you up and running. Contents Contents 1 Xfce: The Missing Manual Documentation, Release 0.1 2 Contents CHAPTER 1 What is Xfce? Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment built for simplicity and efficiency. Xfce takes up far less space than other desktop environments such as KDE, GNOME, Unity etc and is very responsive. Xfce philosophy is to get out of your way and let you complete your work efficiently and easily. Xfce project has a high emphasis on stability meaning that core functionality does not change frequently causing you to re-learn your workflow. 3 Xfce: The Missing Manual Documentation, Release 0.1 4 Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Door & Window Manufacturer Magazine
    ™ Free Subscription Form on Page 50 $500 DOOR & WINDOW MANUFACTURER MAGAZINE VOLUME 9/ISSUE 7/JULY-AUGUST 2008 Focus on Wood Wood Products • IWF Preview • Wood Products on Display • Glass: An End to One Size Fits All? • 2007 Expansions and Acquisitions Data • AAMA Review THE FUTURE OF FENESTRATION MANUFACTURING IS IN YOUR HANDS Signature Series Introducing the Signature™ and Allure™ Series—Truth’s breathtaking new handle sets for the sliding patio door market are elegant and revolutionary in design. Truth has designed a unique set of patio door handles created to enhance any size patio door. Handle Sets Offer: • The opportunity to customize your door through escutcheon style options • Compatible with industry standard single or multi-point mortise locks • Handles to fit stile thickness ranging from 1.25″ to 2.25″ Signature Series • Optional key lock cylinders • Inactive configurations for OXXO doors • Extended bosses on inside and outside escutcheons to enhance handle stability • Truth’s Signature Series are available in plated decorative finishes on solid brass Allure Series or painted finishes on zinc • Truth’s Allure Series are available in painted finishes on an aluminum base Signature SERIES For more information visit www.truth.com or call 1-800-866-7884. S-GLAZE™ STRUCTURAL ADHESIVE ™ DWMDOOR & WINDOW MANUFACTURER MAGAZINE CONTENTS VOLUME 9/ISSUE 7/JULY-AUGUST 2008 www.dwmmag.com 34 features departments What’s News . 12 22 Climate Control Energy and Environmental News. 20 Is the same low-E glass right for every geographic region? The answers are Introducing . 46 varied. See what the industry has to say about the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Standing Christopher Storey Louisiana Tech University
    Louisiana Tech University Louisiana Tech Digital Commons Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School Winter 2007 Understanding standing Christopher Storey Louisiana Tech University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.latech.edu/dissertations Part of the Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Commons Recommended Citation Storey, Christopher, "" (2007). Dissertation. 545. https://digitalcommons.latech.edu/dissertations/545 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Louisiana Tech Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Louisiana Tech Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING STANDING by Christopher Storey, BS MS A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy College of Engineering and Science Louisiana Tech University March 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3259725 Copyright 2007 by Storey, Christopher All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 3259725 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O.
    [Show full text]