What the Women of Maine Have Done”: Women’S Wartime Work and Postwar Activism, 1860-1875

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What the Women of Maine Have Done”: Women’S Wartime Work and Postwar Activism, 1860-1875 Maine History Volume 48 Number 1 Maine and the Civil War Article 5 1-1-2014 “What the Women of Maine Have Done”: Women’s Wartime Work and Postwar Activism, 1860-1875 Lisa Marie Rude Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal Part of the Cultural History Commons, Social History Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Rude, Lisa Marie. "“What the Women of Maine Have Done”: Women’s Wartime Work and Postwar Activism, 1860-1875." Maine History 48, 1 (2014): 86-109. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mainehistoryjournal/vol48/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “WHAT THE WOMEN OF MAINE HAVE DONE”: WOMEN’S WARTIME WORK AND POSTWAR ACTIVISM, 1860-1875 BY LISA MARIE RUDE Maine women had been active in reform movements during the antebel - lum era. They joined mother’s associations, temperance groups, aboli - tionist societies, and woman suffrage organizations. Although the Civil War did not create activists, it did strengthen them, while opening the door for other women to become activists. The war provided an unprece - dented opportunity for the women of Maine to be actors in the public sphere. Postwar women’s movements in Maine were therefore fueled by their agency on the home front during the war. The author is currently a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Maine, working under the supervi - sion of Dr. Mary Hough. In 2007, she received her master’s degree in women’s history from Sarah Lawrence College, where her research cen - tered on how Betty Ford refocused the American perspective on the First Ladyship. Her current work at the University of Maine examines the sources of influence on the First Lady, and the nature of power and poli - tics. ARS OFTEN have unintended consequences. Begun in April 1861 as a war to preserve the political union between the Wnorthern and southern states, the Civil War ultimately trans - formed American society in a number of ways. The relationship of the states to the federal government, the place of African Americans in American society, and the labor system in the South were all changed by the war. Women’s rights activists also called for change. Just as African American men helped their own cause for civil rights by fighting in the war, many northern women hoped their wartime efforts on behalf of the Union would lead to citizenship rights. As the Portland Daily Advertiser noted in a July 1862 article entitled, “What the Women of Maine Have Done,” Maine women Maine History 48:1 January 2014 Women of Maine have yielded up loved ones sufficient to meet the calls of the govern - ment, and will continue to do so. They have worked for the sick and dying; they have given from their often scanty resources, to add com - forts to the camp and the hospital; they have prayed and wept for their country; they have sent their hearts along to the battle-field with their heroes, there to keep them, while a northern soldier sweats and bleeds beneath a southern sun. 1 As the article’s title made clear, the women of Maine had done quite a lot to preserve the Union. Many Maine women hoped their efforts would reap rewards after the war. Women’s historians have debated the extent to which wartime work fostered the growth of women’s activism after the war. 2 Certainly one of the leading suffragists of the nineteenth century thought that was the case. According to Elizabeth Cady Stanton, the Civil War had “created a revolution in woman herself, as important in its results as the changed conditions of former slaves.” 3 In Maine, the Civil War provided an un - precedented opportunity for women to be actors in the public sphere through activism, volunteerism, and wage labor. Women supported the Union war effort in a number of ways, both public and private. During the war, many Maine women worked outside of the home by forming soldiers’ aid societies, by caring for wounded soldiers as nurses, or by filling in for male relatives at factories or stores. Women also expanded their domestic roles while their husbands, brothers, and fathers were away at war. Wartime work gave women in Maine a view of life beyond their traditional sphere. Whether or not they had been engaged in benevolence and social activism work before the war, women’s work during the war strengthened their resolve to engage in such forms of ac - tivism after the war. Postwar women’s movements in Maine were there - fore fueled by their work on the home front during the war. Women’s Roles and the Cult of True Womanhood in Antebellum Maine In the early nineteenth century, American society was transitioning out of the Revolutionary period and into a new, changing, and often- contentious era. In this new era, ideas about women and their role in the new country shifted. Women were now held up on a pedestal, and char - acterized as passive, submissive, and the moral guardians of society. This characterization was known as “true womanhood.” 4 The notion of true womanhood proposed that a woman’s place was in the home; as such her political role was limited to raising virtuous and patriotic sons. Ac - cording to historian Mary Beth Norton, “Women’s domestic and mater - Maine History nal role came to be seen as so important that it was believed women sac - rificed their femininity if they attempted to be more (or other) than wives and mothers.” 5 As a Hallowell newspaper noted in 1843, a woman’s “highest ambition was to secure, as her husband, some indus - trious young farmer, and . make him a good wife.” In reality, though, women were not all the “precious porcelains of human clay” that society thought them to be. 6 Despite this ideal of domesticity, many antebellum women were en - gaged in public life, through either benevolence work or wage labor. Re - garding the latter, many middle- and working-class Maine women found work in the new textile factories in New England. 7 Regardless of contemporary norms, increased production in textile mills across New England opened spaces for women to join the work force, either out of need for wages or to escape farm work. Young female workers were often sought by New England factory owners in the early years of industrial - ization. Women and girls could be paid less than their male counterparts – often a fourth or third of what men made in similar occupations. 8 Thus, women provided factories with a steady supply of cheap labor. In addition, these young women were likely to marry and leave the factory for their husband’s home after a few years, thereby (in theory) avoiding the creation of a permanent proletariat class as had emerged in indus - trial centers in Europe. 9 In the 1830s, women and girls represented a majority of workers in the emerging textile industry in New England, and as late as 1850, were about a quarter of the manufacturing labor force in the United States. 10 Maine factories, including those in Saco, Portland, and Lewiston, advertised for women workers in the antebel - lum years. “Wanted, six or eight good coat makers and several girls to learn the trade,” went one 1848 notice in the Maine Cultivator & Hallow - ell Gazette. 11 Regardless of their social class, women shared in the same experi - ences of being confined, by virtue of their gender, to social and cultural strictures of the early nineteenth century. Yet, there were real differences between the lives of working-class and middle-class women. As historian Sara M. Evans has noted, “Most working-class women paid little heed to the canon of domesticity. It fit too little of their reality to prompt any de - sire for emulation or conformity to its tenets.” 12 A growing middle-class of women could afford not to work wage labor jobs, nor did many par - ticularly want to do so. While working-class women often labored out - side of the home, most middle-class women did not. Even if they wanted professional careers, well-educated middle-class women found them - Women of Maine selves excluded as a result of new professional licensing practices. 13 Above all, society told them they were supposed to be the ones who, as historians Edward O. Schriver and Stanley R. Howe put it, “looked after the needs of the family and provided moral training for the children. As guardians of society’s more refined virtues, they were supposed to ex - hibit piety, purity, submission, and domesticity.” This construction of “woman” prevented women from seeking careers or entering politics. 14 Yet, some middle-class women took on other public roles. Although many women accepted their roles in the domestic realm, the narrowing of “proper spheres” caused discontent among a growing number of educated middle-class women. Many of these women took their business skills into the field of benevolence work. Early benevo - lence workers began as economic, social, and educational problem solvers in their own communities. 15 Class and social background greatly determined what type of benevolent work a woman supported. Al - though antebellum women engaged in benevolent work, it was viewed as sentimental rather than invigorating. Unpaid home labor was seen as a leisurely activity; thus women “naturally” engaged in private home work. By contrast, wage labor was typically seen as an expression of manliness, intellect, and social bonding.
Recommended publications
  • The Known Patriots at the Battle of Kings Mountain October 7, 1780
    The Known Patriots at the Battle of Kings Mountain October 7, 1780 Image Courtesy of National Park Planner at www.npplan.com © 2015 – J.D. Lewis www.carolana.com Note #1 Most who study the Battle of Kings Mountain are certainly aware that the Patriot leaders made a smart choice in leaving the “infantry” behind, and for only “able horsemen” to ride on. What they intuitively “know” – but seem to fail to thoroughly “embrace” is: Almost all “officers” had good horses. Therefore…. Many Patriot “Captains” had few men, sometimes no men, under their command during the actual battle at Kings Mountain. Most historians refuse to accept that at this important event, there were almost more Patriot officers engaged than militiamen, and that this is significant. Majors led as few as two (2) Captains, and many who had no men, or only one to five. It was rare, but some Captains did have more than ten men. Few had their original companies at full strength. It will soon be shown that the companies averaged only 5 men. 2 Note #2 Although the British seized Charlestown and many officers, and they once again devastated both the SC and NC militia at the Battle of Camden, the Patriots constantly kept rebuilding their militia in both states, and they retained their “semblance of order” by continuing the well-known “regiments” and recognized the leaders of all established militia units. Leaders of these well-established and well-known militia regiments agreed to “work with each other” for the common good of all. Ever since the start of the war, Captains attached themselves to other regiments when it was convenient.
    [Show full text]
  • "Civil War Soldiers Recall Visiting Taneytown" Carroll County Times
    "Civil War Soldiers Recall Visiting Taneytown" Carroll County Times article for 17 August 1997 By Jay A. Graybeal During the Gettysburg Campaign, thousands of Union soldiers passed through Taneytown to and from the battle. Maj. Gen. George G. Meade arrived early on the morning of June 29th and established his field headquarters on the Benjamin Shunk farm near town. While there, he developed his Pipe Creek Line plan and began placing troops from Middleburg to Manchester. The III Corps commanded by Gen. Daniel E. Sickles arrived in Taneytown on 30 June 1863 and Gen. Winfield S. Hancock's II Corps passed through town on the following afternoon. Some of these soldiers later recalled their experiences in Taneytown on the eve of the battle and the following writings from published regimental histories provide an additional perspective on local life during the campaign. Gilbert A. Hays included a brief description his unit's visit in his history of the 63rd Pennsylvania Volunteer Infantry: On the 29th our march was continued through Walkersville, Woodbury, Middlebury and Taneytown, and our reception in the various places as extremely enthusiastic. Ladies and young girls distributed beautiful bouquets to the officers and soldiers; groups of fair damsels bewitchingly posted in conspicuous places sang patriotic airs as the "boys in blue" passed by and the passage of troops being a novelty here, the citizens turned out en masse. Long after tattoo, groups of ladies and gentlemen promenaded through our camps, actuated by a curiosity to see how soldiers really lived in the tented field. A fellow Pennsylvanian, Frank Rauscher of the 114th Volunteer Infantry (Collis' Zouaves) recorded in his diary, June 29.-We broke camp at 6 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Age Group Genre Kian Lawley & JC Caylen Don't Try This at Home!
    Author(s) Title Age Group Genre Format Kian Lawley & JC Caylen Don't Try This at Home! A/T Humor Book Penelope Leach When Parents Part- Divorce and parent Separation A/T Theory Book Riva Greenberg 50 Diabetes Myths and Truths- Save or Ruin your life A/T Nutrition Book A. S. King Glory O'Brien History of the Future Adult FIction Book A. Scott Berg Max Perkins Editor of Genius Adult Biography Book A.A. Gill Pour me a Life Adult Memoir Book A.N. Holmes The Mistress's Daughter Adult Fiction Book Aaron Hartzler Rapture Practice Adult Nonfiction Book Aaron Tabor M.D. Jesus Daily 365 Interactive Devotions Adult Religion Book Abigail Gehring Odd Jobs Adult Self-Help Book Abrahm H. Foxman Viral Hate Adult Nonfiction Book Adam Begley The Great Nadar Adult Biography Book Adam Johnson Fortune Smiles Adult Memoir Book Adam Lashinsky Wild Ride Adult Nonfiction Book Adam Mansbach You Have to F**king Eat Adult Fiction Audio Adam Skolnick One Breath Adult Sports Book Adrian Gostick and Chester Elton The Orange Revolution Adult Business Book Affinity Konar Mischling Adult Historical Fiction Audio Ahdaf Soueif Cairo adult Nonfiction Book Akikur Mohammad The Anatomy of Addiction Adult Health Book Al Franken Al Franken Giant of the Senate Adult Politics Book Alan Alda If I Understood You Would I Have This Look on my Face?` Adult Essay/nonfiction Book Alan Page All Rise Adult Religion Book Alberto R. Gonzales True Faith and Allegiance Adult Biography/politics Book Aldo Leopold A Sand County Almanac Adult Reference Book Alec Baldwin Nevertheless Adult Memoir Book Alec Russell Bring me my Machine Gun Adult Current Events Book alex Alice and Xavier Dorison The Third Testament Book 1: The Lion Awakes Adult Fiction/Romance Book Alex Alice and Xavier Dorison The Third Testament Book 2: The Angel's Face Adult Fiction/Romance Book Alex Danchev Georges Braque Adult Biography Book Alfredo Corchado Midnight in Mexico adult memoir Book Alice Arlen & Michael J.
    [Show full text]
  • “Sharpshooters Made a Grand Record This Day” Combat on the Skirmish Line at Gettysburg on July 3
    “Sharpshooters Made a Grand Record This Day” Combat on the Skirmish Line at Gettysburg on July 3 Timothy J. Orr On the morning of July 3, 1863, Corporal Eugene B. Kelleran, a soldier in Company I, 20th Maine Infantry, descended the slopes of Big Round Top, a rocky eminence where his regiment had spent the previous evening. Near dark on July 2, the fatigued Maine regiment scaled the wooded heights, drove off an enemy brigade, and took possession of the summit. As per standard procedure, the 20th Maine’s commander, Colonel Joshua Chamberlain, deployed skirmishers to determine the layout of the Confederate line and to make certain that his regiment truly held the hill. Midway down the southwestern slope, Kelleran and his comrades collided with skirmishers from Colonel James Sheffield’s Alabama brigade. A short fight ensued, lasting only a few minutes. The Maine regiment lost Lieutenant Arad Linscott, who had seized an abandoned musket so he could get a shot at the gray-coats himself. A ball struck Linscott in the thigh, and he died several hours later at the Jacob Weikert farm.1 During this engagement, a Confederate skirmisher kneeling behind a rock took aim at Corporal Kelleran, who also lowered his own rifle and fired. Kelleran got off his shot, which passed through the Alabamian’s mouth and came out the back of his head. When the shooting subsided, Kelleran went to the blood-spattered boulder and noticed that the man’s hat had been left untouched by both the bullet and the resulting gore. Kelleran had long wanted a new hat, so he took this one from his fallen adversary.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Prisons in American Memory Benjamin Gregory Cloyd Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 Civil War prisons in American memory Benjamin Gregory Cloyd Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Cloyd, Benjamin Gregory, "Civil War prisons in American memory" (2005). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 121. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/121 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. CIVIL WAR PRISONS IN AMERICAN MEMORY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Benjamin Gregory Cloyd B.A., University of Notre Dame, 1998 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2000 August 2005 ©Copyright 2005 Benjamin Gregory Cloyd All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A considerable amount of people deserve thanks for their help during this project. My advisor, Gaines M. Foster, provided consistent encouragement, keen editorial insight, and a model of scholarship for which I am deeply grateful. The dissertation committee, Wayne Parent, John Rodrigue,
    [Show full text]
  • William Francis Allen's Civil War Journals. Edited by J
    Allen, William Francis. A Yankee Scholar in Coastal South Carolina: William Francis Allen’s Civil War Journals. Edited by James Robert Hester. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2015. Preface Named and described 188 former slaves of various ages Kept three journals his time spent in the South Edited Slave Songs of the United States in 1867 Strong faith in New England ways A Note on Transcripts and sources Letters and writings and journal at Wisconsin Historical Society Journals written in form of letters to be circulated Introduction Born September 5, 1860 west of Boston Precocity in both music and writing Harvard, 1851, Phi Betta Kappa Then extensive European travals--scholar Taught at a Massachusetts school, married in 1862 Teacher on St. Helena (Sea Island, SC) Became one of the famous “Gideonites” Worked with antislavery free labor experimenter Francis Philbrick His view of freedpeople as human beings, 3--do we measure by 19th century or 21st century standards? Allen both teaching and studying the freedpeople-a kind of anthropologist Remained on St. Helena island through June 1864 April 1865 becomes an assistant superintendent of schools in Charleston, SC Inzer, John Washington. The Diary of a Confederate Soldier: John Washington Inzer, 1834- 1928. Edited by Mattie Lou Teague Crow. Huntsville, Ala.: Strode Publishers, 1977. 9th, 58th Alabama and other regiments Sleeping in old railway car, 24-25 Disease, morale, 27 Corinth, 27 Shiloh, 28-29 Corinth, 29ff Marching, 30-31 Food prices, 36 Captured by Union troops, prisoner,
    [Show full text]
  • The Isolation Factor: Differing Loyalties in the Mountain Counties of Watauga and Buncombe During the Civil War
    1 THE ISOLATION FACTOR: DIFFERING LOYALTIES IN THE MOUNTAIN COUNTIES OF WATAUGA AND BUNCOMBE DURING THE CIVIL WAR By Kevin Oshnock 2 William J. Brown, a man who lived on the fringes of Buncombe County near the Madison County line, commented that “the once happy & prosperous, but now broken Union” was to be dissolved and that “they tore up the flag of the US & made a new one with seven stars.” He continued by saying they “dropt the glorious old Eagle. It makes the heart sad to see & dwell on it.”1 In Appalachian North Carolina, there existed a great diversity of ideas on the issue of secession at the start of the Civil War. In Watauga and Buncombe counties, the isolation factor was evident. The higher the elevation at which people lived, the more likely they were to be Unionists, and the enlistment patterns for both Union and Confederate soldiers show this trend. Buncombe and Watauga counties experienced the war quite differently, and examining enlistment patterns in the Confederate and Union armies helps to illustrate those differences. Buncombe County was one of the lower elevated and flatter counties in the North Carolina mountains and had the most links to the slave economy. Watauga County, at a much higher elevation, had the fewest slaves and lowest population in the state in 1860. It had only 31 slave owners and 104 slaves while Buncombe County had 1,923.2 There was a great amount of diversity within the region with people living in the broad river valleys generally being more prosperous and more connected to the Deep South than those living farther up the more isolated hollows and ridges.
    [Show full text]
  • American Academy of Chefs Announces 2009 Award Winners and Inductees
    AMERICAN CULINARY FEDERATION PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: MEDIA CONTACT: Leah Craig or Patricia Carroll July 16, 2009 (800) 624-9458, ext. 113 or ext. 147 [email protected]; [email protected] American Academy of Chefs Announces 2009 Award Winners and Inductees St. Augustine, Fla., July 16, 2009—The American Academy of Chefs (AAC), the honor society of the American Culinary Federation (ACF), inducted 13 members and six honorary members, and presented the following awards during a formal ceremony and dinner at the 2009 ACF National Convention held at the Orlando World Center Marriott, Orlando, Fla., July 10. Chair’s Medal John Minniti, CEC, AAC, HBOT; retired, Treasure Island, Fla.; ACF Professional Chefs Association of South Jersey Joseph Amendola Award Gunther Heiland, CMPC, AAC; retired, Pottstown, Pa.; ACF Philadelphia Chapter Chef Good Taste Award John Bogacki, CEC, CCE, AAC; executive chef, Westwood Country Club, St. Louis; Chefs de Cuisine Association of St. Louis, Inc., Sharing Culinary Traditions Award L. Timothy Ryan, CMC, AAC; president, The Culinary Institute of America, Hyde Park, N.Y.; Mid Hudson Culinary Association Lt. General John D. McLaughlin Award Brigadier General Jesse Cross; commanding general, U.S. Army Quartermaster Center and School, Fort Lee, Va. Lawrence A. Conti, CEC, AAC, HOF, Chair’s Achievement Award Harry Hoffstadt, CEC, AAC, HOF; retired, Niles, Ill.; ACF Chicago Chefs of Cuisine, Inc. -MORE- American Academy of Chefs Culinary Hall of Fame Michel Escoffier; president, Foundation Auguste Escoffier, Villeneuve-Loubet, France Gerhart Koennecke, AAC; posthumously, Deptford, N.J.; ACF Philadelphia Chapter Phil Learned, CEC, AAC; retired, Andover, Maine; ACF Chapter of Northern New Hampshire John Minniti, CEC, AAC, HBOT; retired, Treasure Island, Fla.; ACF Professional Chefs Association of South Jersey Michael Rand, HAAC; director of hospitality sales, Barber Foods, Portland, Maine; ACF Greater Atlanta Chapter, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Recruitment and the Draft in the Civil War Melissa Traub University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected]
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Honors Scholar Theses Honors Scholar Program Fall 12-15-2015 “$300 or Your Life”: Recruitment and the Draft in the Civil War Melissa Traub University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Traub, Melissa, "“$300 or Your Life”: Recruitment and the Draft in the ivC il War" (2015). Honors Scholar Theses. 468. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/468 “$300 or Your Life”: Recruitment and the Draft in the Civil War By Melissa Traub 1 One of the most challenging tasks of a nation at war is turning its average citizens into soldiers capable of winning a war. While volunteers flooded to the war front in thousands in the beginning of the Civil War, recruitment in both the North and South slowly dwindled as the war dragged on. Eventually, the North was forced to pass the Enrollment Act of 1863, the first national draft in United States history. Every able bodied man between the ages of twenty and forty-five was subject to the draft.1 For an already unstable nation, the national draft did little to heal the divides that split the country. The policies of substitution and commutation led to great resentment, eventually sparking the New York City Draft Riots of 1863. While the public outrage and the politics of the draft have been thoroughly examined, little has ever been studied about the reactions and sentiments of the already enlisted Union soldiers who were out on the battlefront.
    [Show full text]
  • CC-GRAD-Classof2021-Program.Pdf
    147th academic year CLASS OF 2021 Sunday, May 23, 2021 9 a.m. Weidner Field Colorado Springs, Colorado SENIOR CLASS GIFT The Class of 2021 demonstrated their commitment to Colorado College through their philanthropic senior class gift effort. They have directed gifts toward the Colorado College Mutual Aid Fund—a fund created by students to support immediate needs facing their classmates such as housing and food insecurity. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Colorado College is located within the unceded territory of the Ute Peoples. Other tribes who historically used, and continue to use, the land also include the Apache, Arapaho, Comanche, and Cheyenne. IMPORTANT INFORMATION Sign Language Interpretation: Guests who are deaf or hard of hearing may sit on the west side of the field (section 104) where the stadium screen is visible. Photography: A professional photographer will be taking photos of each graduate. To order your photos please visit www.gradimages.com. Audience members for today’s event may be filmed, recorded, or photographed. Visitors consent to appear in documentation and media and its future use by Colorado College. Gown Returns: Graduates may keep their gowns or recycle them in bins located near the exit. Recording Available Online: The Commencement video recording will be available for viewing beginning June 15 at www.coloradocollege.edu/commencement . Share your photos and tweets: #coloradocollege2021 www.coloradocollege.edu/commencement – 2 – Dear Class of 2021, We are excited to be together today to mark this important milestone: your graduation. Whether in person or virtual, you spent four years living and learning in a fast-paced living and learning community and brought meaning to your studies through dynamic curricular engagements.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln County Men at Kings Mountain
    Lincoln County Men at Kings Mountain Men who contributed to the Kings Mountain victory, 7 October 1780. Copyright © 2009–2010 by William Lee Anderson III. All rights reserved. Lincoln County Men at Kings Mountain Synopsis The Battle of Kings Mountain was a decisive Patriot victory during the American Revolution. Its story usually focuses on the extraordinary trek of the Overmountain Men from Virginia and what is now Tennessee. But about half the participants were from North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Their stories are also compelling. Lincoln County men contributed much to the Patriot victory at the Battle of Kings Mountain on 7 October 1780. They were a distinct military unit before and during the battle. Their strength was 60 to 80 men. Yet, their contribution and sacrifice was well out of proportion to their numbers. Important facts are: The American Revolution began on 19 April 1775 at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts. This event caused widespread anger throughout the 13 colonies. On 14 August 1775, Whigs of Tryon County, North Carolina, met and composed the Tryon County Resolves. It asserted that they would take up arms to defend against ―ministerial vengeance and despotism.‖ It stipulated that all residents were to sign an oath of allegiance to this new government. But Tryon County residents were very conflicted. Many influential men wanted to remain loyal to Great Britain. These Loyalists chafed at being excluded from government decisions from 1775 to 1780. Lincoln County was formed in April 1779 from Tryon County. It was named for the distinguished Major General Benjamin Lincoln who at that time commanded American forces opposite British occupied Savannah, Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Eicher's Ultimate Gettysbur
    Eicher's Ultimate Gettysburg Order of Battle file:///F:/Website/GDG/webroot/Research/OOB/EicherOOB.htm Compiled by John H. Eicher. Key: underlined names are those who submitted official reports; ≠ = also assigned above; Ø = also assigned below; [X] company letter; # = pounder weight; " = inch bore; (rank=relative rank in grade); AoP = Army of the Potomac; k. = killed; m. = missing; mw. = mortally wounded; w.= wounded; c.= captured; co./cos. = company/companies; MOH = Medal of Honor. Note that normally a Surg. = Maj. and Asst. Surg. = Capt. Names of general officers are given in boldface. Area Department Commands: Department of Washington (22d Corps): Maj. Gen. Samuel Peter Heintzelman (rank=25) (not at Gettysburg) Lt. Col. Chauncey McKeever, Asst. Adj. Gen. (not at Gettysburg) Capt. Carroll Hagadorn Potter, Asst. Adj. Gen. (not at Gettysburg) Escort: 5th N.Y. Cav. [I], Capt. George C. Morton (not at Gettysburg) (to Cav. D.) District of Washington: Brig. Gen. John Henry Martindale (rank=46) (not at Gettysburg) 2d D.C. Inf.: Col. Charles M. Alexandria‡ 34th Mass. Inf.: Col. George Duncan Wells‡ (to Dept. of W.Va., then to Naglee’s D., Middle Dept.) 39th Mass. Inf: Col. Phineas S. Davis (not at Gettysburg) (to AoP July 10) 14th N.H. Inf.: Col. Robert Wilson (not at Gettysburg) 27th Pa. Inf. [F]: Capt. John M. Carson (not at Gettysburg) 150th Pa. Inf. [K]: Lt. Thomas Getchell (not at Gettysburg) 157th Pa. Inf. [4 cos.]: Maj. Thomas H. Addicks (not at Gettysburg) 11th N.Y. Cav.: Col. James B. Swain (not at Gettysburg) (part to 1st Sep. B., Middle Dept.) U.S.
    [Show full text]