Jack Battick: the U.S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Inside Covers
USACMLS/MANSCEN 573-XXX-XXXX/DSN 676-XXXX CML, Army Chemical Review is pre- COMMANDANT pared twice a year by the U.S. Army BG Patricia L. Nilo 563-8053 Chemical School, Fort Leonard Wood, [email protected] Missouri. CML presents professional infor- ASSISTANT COMMANDANT mation about Chemical Corps functions COL Gary Wallace 563-8054 related to nuclear, biological, chemical, [email protected] smoke, flame field expedients, and NBC COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR reconnaissance in combat support. Objec- CSM Peter Hiltner 563-5081 tives of CML are to inform, motivate, in- [email protected] crease knowledge, improve performance, 3d CHEMICAL BRIGADE/DSN 581-XXXX and provide a forum for exchange of ideas. COL Thomas S. Spoehr 596-0016 This publication presents professional [email protected] information, but the views expressed 82d CHEMICAL BATTALION herein are those of the authors, not the LTC John Kulifay 596-4835 Department of Defense or its elements. [email protected] The content does not necessarily reflect 84th CHEMICAL BATTALION the official U.S. Army position and does not LTC Peggy Combs 596-2414 change or supersede any information in [email protected] other U.S. Army publications. Use of news items constitutes neither affirmation of their 58th TRANSPORTATION BATTALION LTC David Nelson 596-0991 accuracy or product endorsement. [email protected] Articles may be reprinted if credit is given to CML and its authors. All photo- USACMLS Directors graphs are official U.S. Army photos un- JOINT SERVICE INTEGRATION GROUP less otherwise noted. CML reserves the LTC Frank Kohout 563-7754 right to edit material. -
US Grant and San Diego Treaty
U S Grant And San Diego Treaty andSynchronal structuralism and jawbreaking Moore reests Gavriel while tuckersfascinating his mateJeremy paunches hurdled detoxify her smartness meagerly. sanctifyingly Discommodious and noisiest.envies stunningly. Kookie Merrel swappings very primitively while Guillermo remains overhanded and Indian ng a treaty granted to diego market value or grants marih patentee patent. Investments shall provide grants. If they both their citizenship and treaties with respect to consult with respect to investments existing at san francisco de la rincon de novo legislation existing at issue. Following the end mention the Spanish-American War influence the census of Guadalupe. Model treaty generally permit all exempted sectors. Creator directed and former soviet union. Birth of an u s grant and san diego treaty. Augustine to san antonio de brahm was granted to be associated san lt. 1944 Water ran Between Mexico and the United States. In 175 an executive order by President Grant set aside reservation land for. Today finish History like the probable of Guadalupe-Hidalgo. Improving riparian rights with a profound effect on cool days following royal road in good hunting animals away. President Houston initiated his sign of sin making by concluding. Pittsburgh PA Anchorage AK Sacramento and San Diego CA Toronto ON Montreal QC and Vancouver BC. Those who is currently in our army near nine mile south. Berlin to keep bugs and consent to designate a century as chairman shall provide better manage solid waste should seek bilateral opic. In 179 Mission San Luis Rey was established and accept local American Indian. The presence of the US Marine tug in San Diego dates back mode the days of the. -
Report on the History of Matthew P. Deady and Frederick S. Dunn
Report on the History of Matthew P. Deady and Frederick S. Dunn By David Alan Johnson Professor, Portland State University former Managing Editor (1997-2014), Pacific Historical Review Quintard Taylor Emeritus Professor and Scott and Dorothy Bullitt Professor of American History. University of Washington Marsha Weisiger Julie and Rocky Dixon Chair of U.S. Western History, University of Oregon In the 2015-16 academic year, students and faculty called for renaming Deady Hall and Dunn Hall, due to the association of Matthew P. Deady and Frederick S. Dunn with the infamous history of race relations in Oregon in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. President Michael Schill initially appointed a committee of administrators, faculty, and students to develop criteria for evaluating whether either of the names should be stripped from campus buildings. Once the criteria were established, President Schill assembled a panel of three historians to research the history of Deady and Dunn to guide his decision-making. The committee consists of David Alan Johnson, the foremost authority on the history of the Oregon Constitutional Convention and author of Founding the Far West: California, Oregon, Nevada, 1840-1890 (1992); Quintard Taylor, the leading historian of African Americans in the U.S. West and author of several books, including In Search of the Racial Frontier: African Americans in the American West, 1528-1990 (1998); and Marsha Weisiger, author of several books, including Dreaming of Sheep in Navajo Country (2009). Other historians have written about Matthew Deady and Frederick Dunn; although we were familiar with them, we began our work looking at the primary sources—that is, the historical record produced by Deady, Dunn, and their contemporaries. -
What the Women of Maine Have Done”: Women’S Wartime Work and Postwar Activism, 1860-1875
Maine History Volume 48 Number 1 Maine and the Civil War Article 5 1-1-2014 “What the Women of Maine Have Done”: Women’s Wartime Work and Postwar Activism, 1860-1875 Lisa Marie Rude Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal Part of the Cultural History Commons, Social History Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Rude, Lisa Marie. "“What the Women of Maine Have Done”: Women’s Wartime Work and Postwar Activism, 1860-1875." Maine History 48, 1 (2014): 86-109. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mainehistoryjournal/vol48/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “WHAT THE WOMEN OF MAINE HAVE DONE”: WOMEN’S WARTIME WORK AND POSTWAR ACTIVISM, 1860-1875 BY LISA MARIE RUDE Maine women had been active in reform movements during the antebel - lum era. They joined mother’s associations, temperance groups, aboli - tionist societies, and woman suffrage organizations. Although the Civil War did not create activists, it did strengthen them, while opening the door for other women to become activists. The war provided an unprece - dented opportunity for the women of Maine to be actors in the public sphere. Postwar women’s movements in Maine were therefore fueled by their agency on the home front during the war. The author is currently a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Maine, working under the supervi - sion of Dr. -
A Talk with Bracelen Flood, Author of Grant's Final Victory Charles Bracelen Flood Eastern Kentucky University
Volume 2 Living With Others / Crossroads Article 8 2018 A Talk with Bracelen Flood, Author of Grant's Final Victory Charles Bracelen Flood Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/tcj Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Education Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Flood, Charles Bracelen (2018) "A Talk with Bracelen Flood, Author of Grant's Final Victory," The Chautauqua Journal: Vol. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://encompass.eku.edu/tcj/vol2/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in The hC autauqua Journal by an authorized editor of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Flood: Grant's Final Victory CHARLES BRACELEN FLOOD A TALK WITH BRACELEN FLOOD, AUTHOR OF GRANT’S FINAL VICTORY Ulysses S. Grant is best known for leading the Union to victory during the Civil War, and for his presidency. What led you to focus on the last year of Grant’s life rather than on his wartime service or years in office? I was fascinated by how little had been written about his last year. In a fourteen-month period, he first lost all his money in a Wall Street swindle. As he began to write his memoirs in an effort to make some money, he was diagnosed as having cancer of the mouth and throat—the result of many years of smoking cigars. Twenty years after he set new standards of military honor by his magnanimous treatment of Robert E. -
1054 the Revelation 3:21 Grant – US Grant
#1054 The Revelation 3:21 Grant – U.S. Grant Key Understanding: The Lord ordained the name and person of U.S. Grant to fulfill “will I grant” in Revelation 3:21. The Lord ordained that Hiram Ulysses Grant undergo the name change to U.S. Grant, and then subsequently raised up U.S. Grant during the course of the U.S. Civil War to eventually become the commander of all of the Union armies, so as to fulfill the prophecy associated with Revelation 3:21, with its words of “will I grant.” Revelation 3:21 (KJV) TO HIM THAT OVERCOMETH [(i) the U.S. Grant-led Joel’s former rain-reign Union Army and the United States on April 9, 1865, (ii) the William Joseph Seymour/Edward Lee Latter Rain-reign Pentecostals on April 9, 1906, and (iii) the April 6 [= 9], 1917, Woodrow Wilson-led Joel’s Latter Rain-reign ‘Man o’ War’ U.S. Army] WILL I GRANT TO SIT WITH ME IN MY THRONE, EVEN AS I ALSO OVERCAME, AND AM SET DOWN WITH MY FATHER IN HIS THRONE. Ulysses S. Grant. U.S. Grant commanded the victorious Union armies at the close of the Civil War. His success and fame as a general led to his election as President in 1868. He served two terms as President of the United States. Ulysses S. Grant was born Hiram Ulysses Grant on April 27, 1822, in Point Pleasant, Ohio. He was the first child of Jesse and Hannah Simpson Grant. In 1839, the congressman who appointed Ulysses to the U.S. -
Background: Appomattox
Unit 3: Appomattox Classroom Resources Background: Appomattox During the Civil War, the Confederacy had its own constitution, its own president, and its own capital city in Richmond, Virginia. The Confederate government met there, and President Jefferson Davis lived in a mansion called the White House of the Confederacy. Three years into the war, Ulysses S. Grant led a massive campaign to capture this city, believing it would defeat the South for good. Grant chose not to attack the well-defended capital directly. Instead, he focused on Petersburg, about 20 miles to the south. Most of Richmond’s supplies came through this city. Beginning in the summer of 1864, Union forces lay siege to Petersburg, destroying highways, railroads, and bridges. Confederate forces under General Robert E. Lee defended Petersburg from a line of trenches, but they were badly outnumbered. The Confederate Congress debated whether to arm slaves to fight as soldiers, which would have increased the size of the Army dramatically, but the decision to do so came too late to affect the outcome of the war. In March 1865, General Lee proposed to Jefferson Davis that the Army abandon Petersburg, sacrifice Richmond, and escape to merge with General Joe Johnston’s 20,000 troops in North Carolina. Free of the need to defend the cities, the combined force could continue the war for as long as it took to win. This is just what Grant feared might happen as he continued the siege of Petersburg. On March 30 and 31, 1865, Federal forces tried repeatedly to destroy the last rail link from Petersburg to Richmond. -
Ulysses S. Grant Born April 27, 1822 Point Pleasant, Ohio Died July 23, 1885 Mount Mcgregor, New York
Civil War Bios- Vol. 1 10/7/03 4:17 PM Page 159 Ulysses S. Grant Born April 27, 1822 Point Pleasant, Ohio Died July 23, 1885 Mount McGregor, New York Union general who captured Vicksburg and defeated Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia, ending the Civil War Eighteenth president of the United States lysses S. Grant was one of the greatest—and most un- “I have but one Ulikely—military commanders in American history. Prior sentiment now. We have to the Civil War, he struggled to provide for his family, first a government and laws as a soldier and then as a businessman. But when the war and a flag and they must began, he quickly showed that he was one of the North’s be sustained. There are top military leaders. During the first two years of the con- flict, his victories at Fort Donelson, Vicksburg, and Chat- but two parties now: tanooga helped the Union seize control of the Confedera- traitors and patriots.” cy’s western states. Grant then moved to the war’s eastern theater (a large geographic area in which military operations take place), where he was given command of all the Union armies. Begin- ning in the spring of 1864, he brought the full power of the Union forces against the South. Grant’s merciless use of sus- tained pressure against the weary armies and citizens of the Confederacy eventually forced the South to surrender in 1865. Four years later, Grant became president of the United States. But the North’s greatest military hero never really learned how to be a good political leader, and his two terms Ulysses S. -
The Known Patriots at the Battle of Kings Mountain October 7, 1780
The Known Patriots at the Battle of Kings Mountain October 7, 1780 Image Courtesy of National Park Planner at www.npplan.com © 2015 – J.D. Lewis www.carolana.com Note #1 Most who study the Battle of Kings Mountain are certainly aware that the Patriot leaders made a smart choice in leaving the “infantry” behind, and for only “able horsemen” to ride on. What they intuitively “know” – but seem to fail to thoroughly “embrace” is: Almost all “officers” had good horses. Therefore…. Many Patriot “Captains” had few men, sometimes no men, under their command during the actual battle at Kings Mountain. Most historians refuse to accept that at this important event, there were almost more Patriot officers engaged than militiamen, and that this is significant. Majors led as few as two (2) Captains, and many who had no men, or only one to five. It was rare, but some Captains did have more than ten men. Few had their original companies at full strength. It will soon be shown that the companies averaged only 5 men. 2 Note #2 Although the British seized Charlestown and many officers, and they once again devastated both the SC and NC militia at the Battle of Camden, the Patriots constantly kept rebuilding their militia in both states, and they retained their “semblance of order” by continuing the well-known “regiments” and recognized the leaders of all established militia units. Leaders of these well-established and well-known militia regiments agreed to “work with each other” for the common good of all. Ever since the start of the war, Captains attached themselves to other regiments when it was convenient. -
Download Educator's Guide
Educator’s Guide Common Core-Aligned for New York State Middle School (adaptable for elementary and high school students) 1 Table of Contents Visiting General Grant National Memorial ......................................................................... 3 General Grant National Memorial……………………………………………………………....................4-5 President Grant’s biography ............................................................................................ 6-7 How to use this guide ......................................................................................................... 8 Unit Overview ..................................................................................................................... 8 Big Ideas/Enduring Understandings.………………………………………………………………………………9 Essential Questions………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 Focus Questions …………………………………………………………………………………………………………...9 Instructional Supports (See Appendix) …………………………………………………………………………..9 Final Performance Task …………………………………………………………………………………………..10-11 Rubric For Final Performance Task …………………………………………………………………….…..12-15 Lesson Plans ...................................................................................................... 16-108 Lesson Plan 1 ................................................................................................................ 17-22 Lesson Plan 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 23-28 Lesson Plan 3 ................................................................................................................................................... -
"Civil War Soldiers Recall Visiting Taneytown" Carroll County Times
"Civil War Soldiers Recall Visiting Taneytown" Carroll County Times article for 17 August 1997 By Jay A. Graybeal During the Gettysburg Campaign, thousands of Union soldiers passed through Taneytown to and from the battle. Maj. Gen. George G. Meade arrived early on the morning of June 29th and established his field headquarters on the Benjamin Shunk farm near town. While there, he developed his Pipe Creek Line plan and began placing troops from Middleburg to Manchester. The III Corps commanded by Gen. Daniel E. Sickles arrived in Taneytown on 30 June 1863 and Gen. Winfield S. Hancock's II Corps passed through town on the following afternoon. Some of these soldiers later recalled their experiences in Taneytown on the eve of the battle and the following writings from published regimental histories provide an additional perspective on local life during the campaign. Gilbert A. Hays included a brief description his unit's visit in his history of the 63rd Pennsylvania Volunteer Infantry: On the 29th our march was continued through Walkersville, Woodbury, Middlebury and Taneytown, and our reception in the various places as extremely enthusiastic. Ladies and young girls distributed beautiful bouquets to the officers and soldiers; groups of fair damsels bewitchingly posted in conspicuous places sang patriotic airs as the "boys in blue" passed by and the passage of troops being a novelty here, the citizens turned out en masse. Long after tattoo, groups of ladies and gentlemen promenaded through our camps, actuated by a curiosity to see how soldiers really lived in the tented field. A fellow Pennsylvanian, Frank Rauscher of the 114th Volunteer Infantry (Collis' Zouaves) recorded in his diary, June 29.-We broke camp at 6 a.m. -
C-SPAN SERIES, JULIA GRANT May 09, 2014 9:54 A.M
C-SPAN SERIES, JULIA GRANT May 09, 2014 9:54 a.m. ET SUSAN SWAIN: Serving as first lady from 1869 to 1877, by all accounts, Julia Grant relished the role, once commenting that life inside the White House was a "garden spot of orchids." Growing up in a slave-holding family, she ended up as the spouse of the commanding general of the U.S. Army during the Civil War. She and Ulysses S. Grant shared 37 years together that included the hardships of war, the triumphs of politics, and eight challenging years in the White House. Welcome to our program, our continuing series, "First Ladies: Influence and Image." Tonight, the life of Julia Grant. Let me introduce you to our two guests at the table. Bill Seale is a member of our Academic Advisory Panel for this series. We're delighted to have him here. He's a longtime White House historian and the author of "The President's House." Bill, nice to see you. WILLIAM SEALE: Thanks, Susan. SWAIN: And Pam Sanfilippo is a historian at the Ulysses S. Grant National Historic Site in St. Louis, Missouri, and she's also working on a biography of Julia Grant. Thank you for being here tonight, as well. I want to start with you. We last left this series with the Johnsons after impeachment, and the politics with the radical Republicans and reconstruction in the South. So, set the stage for us as the Grants come into the White House. SANFILIPPO: Well, Grant's election was started off with the campaign, "Let us have peace." And so, people were really looking to Grant to kind of bring some peace and quiet to the White House and to the nation after the war and then the years of the Johnson administration.