DOCSLIB.ORG

Lee-Vs-Grant-Brochure.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FREDERICKSBURG # 1864 CAMPAIGN SITES # R A Chatham # Gordonsville – Longstreet’s camp. Home to Exchange Union supply wagons P (National Park P Headquarters) Hotel Civil War Museum. crossed the Rapidan River A # Montpelier – Site of Confederate winter camps, 1863–1864. as Federal troops fought H A # Orange – Confederates moved from this area to meet Grant in The Wilderness. N 218 in The Wilderness. N # Town of Culpeper – Union camps dotted area prior O 3 to 1864 Overland Campaign. C T. 3 S LIAM K # Germanna Ford – Union soldiers crossed here May 4, 1864, BURNSIDE WIL starting the Overland Campaign. (Union) To Washington D.C., # Fredericksburg Wilderness Battlefield Exhibit Shelter – National Park SEDGWICK Visitor Center 34 miles site at the scene of heavy fighting May 5-6, 1864. (Union) # Brandy Station R Todd’s Tavern – Union and Confederate cavalry clashed (Remington, 11 miles) Battlefield S I here May 6-7, 1864. 522 C O P A P V R R H I O I N A L E # C I Spotsylvania Battlefield – National Park tour reviews S N E Graffiti T S E . R 674 P D S the fighting of May 8-21, 1864. LV S House E B A T T . 663 ET N AY O LAF N A # Spotsylvania Court House Historic District – CULPEPE R E S q City Dock – T T u (Multiple Sites) . Battle shattered the village in 1864. Walking tours available. Fredericksburg Battlefield Pontoon Bridge i O HANCOCK Kelly ’s Ford a Crossing M # Harris Farm – Site of last engagement of Spotsylvania 15 (Union) Visitor Center C r 29 e fighting, May 19, 1864.. 1 ek A 1864 Overland Campaign Historic Route # Zion Methodist Church – Spotsylvania landmark. 612 C Confederate Troop Movements from Camps Union army turned to Massaponax here in May 1864. Cedar Mountain R Battlefield WARREN 3 I # (Union) Massaponax Church – Site of photographs showing V S T AFFO RD 630 Union Troop Movements from Camps Federal high command planning campaign. 29 E ) 95 R # Plantations on Guinea Station Road – Antebellum R R 1864 Overland Campaign Site R C ULP EP ER A homes line route of Union march in May 1864. 629 a R P i A Aquia r Other Civil War Trails Site # Guinea Station – Site of Stonewall Jackson’s death 522 P P Landing James City 15 d I D A n Potomac in 1863 is on Union march route a year later. Battlefield A R 17 Hartwood a N E H Creek 608 Other Civil War Site x I V Church # Bethel Church – Gens. Grant, Meade, and Burnside had MADISO N e R A Bridge l N Po ree headquarters here, May 22-23, 1864. A Germanna N toma C k National, State or County Park O c & Ford 1 # EWELL C K Bowling Green – Union soldiers broke into stores, freed 611 (Confederate) 3 e Mine 608 Information or Welcome Center prisoners, and looted the town May 21, 1864, during march g R n Run I 626 to the North Anna River. MA D ISO N a 610 V r Wilderness Battlefield E Restrooms Handicap Accessible O R # Milford Station – Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac ( Exhibit Shelter Chancellorsville 607 Railroad station. Site of skirmish prior to North Anna, White Oak 231 Battlefield Church/Museum May 20, 1864. O RANGE First Day at 15 Chancellorville 218 # Carmel Church – Union army reunited here in preparation HILL-EWELL DR. FREDE RICKSBURG 621 for attacks at the North Anna River. Locust Grove Rochelle 3 20 Widow Tapp 3 # Ox Ford Battlefield (North Anna River) – Confederates (Jack’s Shop) Farm 29 617 1 turned back Union attacks May 24-25, 1864. Hanover County Salem Church 17 Slaughter Pen Farm One of a series of Parker’s Store park. Tour information for North Anna Battlefield available. 621 photographs by 612 Timothy O’Sullivan • Hanover Junction – Critical railroad junction Lee hoped Montpelier Verdiersville Todd’s Tavern of a Union High to protect by defending the North Anna line. (Winter Camps) Fredericksburg Pelham Harris command meeting # Mangohick Church – Elements of the Union army ORANG E Spotsylvania Battlefield Monument HILL 608 Farm at Massaponax marched past here after the North Anna battle. (Confederate) 613 Battlefield . 17 Church. U.S. Grant D # Ashland – Lee marched his troops through here on the way Visitor Center 522 R 208 704 PIN Spotsylvania is leaning over to Cold Harbor. 20 AR TH 608 A Visitor Center a church pew # 651 C Massaponax Nelson’s Crossing – Union army II and VI Corps crossed Spotsylvania Court House Church conferring with the Pamunkey River here. SP O TSY LVANIA Historic District his commanders. # 608 Haw’s Shop/Enon Church – Fierce cavalry battle fought 231 15 here May 28, 1864. 20 Zion Methodist Church Plantations on Guinea Station/ R A # 612 Stonewall P P C K R Totopotomoy Creek – Site of fighting May 28-June 1, 1864. Guinea Station Road 607 A H A N N O I Jackson Shrine V E # Yellow Tavern – Site of the mortal wounding of Confederate R 33 LONGSTREET 208 P O Gen. J.E.B. Stuart, May 11, 1864. (Confederate) R I 2 651 V # Polegreen Church – Church destroyed by artillery 669 E R 609 June 1, 1864, prior to Cold Harbor. GORDONSVILL E 606 # Meadow Bridge – Union cavalry were nearly trapped after Exchange Battle of Yellow Tavern, May 1864. Hotel 626 # Battlefield at Cold Harbor – A National Park visitor 620 632 center and Hanover County park commemorates and inter - 669 prets the battles fought May 31-June 12, 1864. 15 # Trevilian Station – Cavalry fought here June 11-12, 1864, 33 638 301 as Grant began infantry move. (Multiple Trails sites.) 613 # Long Bridge – Union troops crossed Chickahominy River Bethel Church 605 Trevilian Station BOWLIN G GRE EN here after disengaging at Cold Harbor. (Multiple Sites) # 95 Court House Complex Wilcox’s Landing – Site of main Union army James River 22 and Old Star Hotel crossing, this one via boat. Now a Charles City County park. 207 (No modern bridge.) 669 1 # LOUISA 722 North Bend – Union cavalry headquarters, June 1864. Confederate cavalry Flowerdew Hundred – Parts of Union army crossed to Milford • Station commander J.E.B. this site on pontoon bridge over James River.6 H4 istorical park. LO U IS A 676 Stuart (inset) was (Waynesboro, 38 miles) (No modern bridge.) N O CA ROLINE mortally wounded # 208 R Prince George Court House – Large Federal cavalry T 207 during the Battle 33 H M camp located here. of Yellow Tavern, A A # Baylor’s Farm – African American Union troops involved N T May 11, 1864. To Charlottesville N in fighting here June 15, 1864. A R I V E T (see inset below) 250 R A # Port Walthall Junction – Two actions here in May 1864 P O to control railroad. Confederate soldiers beg Lee to ( V i r 656 g i n 655 N # Swift Creek – Union Gen. Butler repulsed an effort to 29 return to the rear as fighting grows i a I C R disrupt Confederate supply lines, May 9, 1864. 522 intense in The Wilderness. e n t r a l R R ) I 20 Carmel 301 V E R # Ellerslie – Plantation was a key Confederate site during Rio Hill Church Swift Creek fighting. 684 654 North Anna 2 # 250 Battlefield Par k Petersburg National Battlefield – Initial Union assaults Confederate on Petersburg defenses, June 15, 1864. Statues 652 # Cavalry Assault – Site of Union cavalry assault against 64 250 Petersburg, June 9, 1864. CHARLOTTESVILLE Ox Ford Battlefield Hanover Junction 602 # RELATED CIVIL WAR SITES # 64 • Kelly’s Ford – Confederate Maj. John Pelham killed during 30 651 cavalry battle here March 17, 1863. 64 H ANO VE R • Brandy Station Battlefield – Largest cavalry battle on the North American continent, June 9, 1863. 29 • Graffiti House – Union and Confederate soldiers covered 638 plaster walls with still-visible graffiti, 1863–1864. Mangohick • Cedar Mountain Battlefield – Stonewall Jackson led 522 Church Confederates in battle here August 9, 1862. 54 604 • James City Battlefield – Day-long cavalry battle here ALBEMARLE Hanover Oct. 10, 1863. ASHL AND Tavern • Rochelle ( Jack’s Shop) – J.E.B. Stuart was almost 615 54 cornered but escaped during this Sept. 22, 1863 battle. ) 20 33 R • Aquia Landing – Important Union supply base for R 605 campaigns in 1862-1864. c a Potomac Creek Bridge – Union supply trains crossed m • o 95 360 here daily on a “cornstalk and beanpole” bridge. t Nelson’s Lieutenant Colonel Charles L. Chandler o 1 Crossing KI NG • White Oak Church/Museum – Site of Union camp in win - rallying the 57th Massachusetts Infantry P 301 ter of 1862. Museum with related artifacts. at Ox Ford, May 24, 1864. & 615 605 g WILL IA M r Enon Church Fredericksburg Visitor Center – Information here about 2 Haw’s Shop • u U N 30 the city’s Civil War history. b 606 k M K s e 6 Yellow Tavern e A E Y R k r Totopotomoy C P I • City Dock – Union infantry crossed here on a pon toon The first Union attacks on c (J.E.B. Stuart y V Confederate Meadow Farm i Creek ot opotomo bridge before assaulting Lee’s army, Dec. 1862. r 295 Monument) T Cemetery and thinly held Confederate lines E Museum e 643 • Fredericksburg Battlefield Visitor Center – Canal Basin Square at Petersburg were successful; 250 d 615 R SCOTTSVILLE e Information here about the battles at Fredericksburg, r Polegreen Church 627 but resistance stiffened F 606 Wilderness, Spotsylvania and Chancellorsville. 6 resulting in a siege. , d 627 Slaughter Pen Farm – Civil War Trust walking trail, site n 628 • o Bethesda R I V of failed Union attack on Jackson’s position, Fredericksburg, S E m Meadow Church E R h M 20 64 Dec.
Recommended publications
  • Brochure Design by Communication Design, Inc., Richmond, VA 877-584-8395 Cheatham Co

    Brochure Design by Communication Design, Inc., Richmond, VA 877-584-8395 Cheatham Co

    To Riggins Hill CLARKSVILLE MURFREESBORO and Fort Defiance Scroll flask and .36 caliber Navy Colt bullet mold N found at Camp Trousdale . S P R site in Sumner County. IN G Stones River S T Courtesy Pat Meguiar . 41 National Battlefield The Cannon Ball House 96 and Cemetery in Blountville still 41 Oaklands shows shell damage to Mansion KNOXVILLE ST. the exterior clapboard LEGE Recapture of 441 COL 231 Evergreen in the rear of the house. Clarksville Cemetery Clarksville 275 40 in the Civil War Rutherford To Ramsey Surrender of ST. County Knoxville National Cemetery House MMERCE Clarksville CO 41 96 Courthouse Old Gray Cemetery Plantation Customs House Whitfield, Museum Bradley & Co. Knoxville Mabry-Hazen Court House House 231 40 “Drawing Artillery Across the Mountains,” East Tennessee Saltville 24 Fort History Center Harper’s Weekly, Nov. 21, 1863 (Multiple Sites) Bleak House Sanders Museum 70 60 68 Crew repairing railroad Chilhowie Fort Dickerson 68 track near Murfreesboro 231 after Battle of Stones River, 1863 – Courtesy 421 81 Library of Congress 129 High Ground 441 Abingdon Park “Battle of Shiloh” – Courtesy Library of Congress 58 41 79 23 58 Gen. George H. Thomas Cumberland 421 Courtesy Library of Congress Gap NHP 58 Tennessee Capitol, Nashville, 1864 Cordell Hull Bristol Courtesy Library of Congress Adams Birthplace (East Hill Cemetery) 51 (Ft. Redmond) Cold Spring School Kingsport Riggins Port Royal Duval-Groves House State Park Mountain Hill State Park City 127 (Lincoln and the 33 Blountville 79 Red Boiling Springs Affair at Travisville 431 65 Portland Indian Mountain Cumberland Gap) 70 11W (See Inset) Clarksville 76 (Palace Park) Clay Co.
  • Architectural Reconnaissance Survey for the Washington, D.C

    Architectural Reconnaissance Survey for the Washington, D.C

    ARCHITECTURAL RECONNAISSANCE Rͳ9 SURVEY, NDEL SEGMENT ΈSEGMENT 13Ή D.C. TO RICHMOND SOUTHEAST HIGH SPEED RAIL November 2016 Architectural Reconnaissance Survey for the Washington, D.C. to Richmond, Virginia High Speed Rail Project North Doswell to Elmont (NDEL) Segment, Hanover County Architectural Reconnaissance Survey for the Washington, D.C. to Richmond, Virginia High Speed Rail Project North Doswell to Elmont (NDEL) Segment, Hanover County by Danae Peckler Prepared for Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation 600 E. Main Street, Suite 2102 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Prepared by DC2RVA Project Team 801 E. Main Street, Suite 1000 Richmond, Virginia 23219 November 2016 February 27, 2017 Kerri S. Barile, Principal Investigator Date ABSTRACT Dovetail Cultural Resource Group (Dovetail), on behalf of the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT), conducted a reconnaissance-level architectural survey of the North Doswell to Elmont (NDEL) segment of the Washington, D.C. to Richmond Southeast High Speed Rail (DC2RVA) project. The proposed Project is being completed under the auspices of the Federal Rail Administration (FRA) in conjunction with DRPT. Because of FRA’s involvement, the undertaking is required to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The project is being completed as Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) File Review #2014-0666. The DC2RVA corridor is divided into 22 segments and this document focuses on the NDEL segment only. This report includes background data that will place each recorded resource within context and the results of fieldwork and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) evaluations for all architectural resources identified in the NDEL segment only.
  • Piedmont District Clubs by Counties

    Piedmont District Clubs by Counties

    Piedmont District of Virginia Federation of Garden Clubs Below is a list of member Garden Clubs by county or city. Location is listed by mailing address of club president. This is not necessarily representative of all club members nor necessarily where the club holds its meeting. However, this is a good approximation. Check clubs listed in neighboring counties and cities as well. If you are interested in contacting a club please send us an email from the ‘Contact’ page and someone will be in contact with you. Thank you! Clubs by Counties Amelia -Clay Spring GC Middlesex -Amelia County GC -Hanover Herb Guild -John Mitchell GC Arlington -Hanover Towne GC -Rock Spring GC -Newfound River GC New Kent Brunswick -Old Ivy GC -Hanover Towne GC Caroline -Pamunkey River GC Charles City -West Hanover GC Northumberland -Chesapeake Bay GC Chesterfield Henrico -Kilmarnock -Bon Air GC -Crown Grant GC -Rappahannock GC -Chester GC -Ginter Park GC -Crestwood Farms GC -Green Acres GC Nottoway -Glebe Point GC -Highland Springs GC -Crewe -Greenfield GC -Hillard Park GC -Midlothian GC -Northam GC Powhatan -Oxford GC - Richmond Designers’ -Powhatan - Richmond Designers’ Guild* Guild* -River Road GC Prince William -Salisbury GC -Roslyn Hills GC -Manassas GC -Stonehenge GC -Sleepy Hollow GC -Woodland Pond GC -Thomas Jefferson GC Prince George -Windsordale GC Richmond County Cumberland -Wyndham GC Southampton -Cartersville GC Spotsylvania Dinwiddie James City -Chancellor GC Essex King and Queen -Sunlight GC Fairfax King George Fluvanna King William Stafford -Fluvanna GC Lancaster Surry Goochland Louisa -Surry GC Greensville -Lake Anna GC Sussex -Sunlight GC Westmoreland Hanover Lunenburg -Westmoreland GC -Canterbury GC Page 1 of 2 *Members of Richmond Designers’ Guild are members of other garden clubs and are from all areas.
  • Proposed Finding

    Proposed Finding

    This page is intentionally left blank. Pamunkey Indian Tribe (Petitioner #323) Proposed Finding Proposed Finding The Pamunkey Indian Tribe (Petitioner #323) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 Regulatory Procedures .............................................................................................1 Administrative History.............................................................................................2 The Historical Indian Tribe ......................................................................................4 CONCLUSIONS UNDER THE CRITERIA (25 CFR 83.7) ..............................................9 Criterion 83.7(a) .....................................................................................................11 Criterion 83.7(b) ....................................................................................................21 Criterion 83.7(c) .....................................................................................................57 Criterion 83.7(d) ...................................................................................................81 Criterion 83.7(e) ....................................................................................................87 Criterion 83.7(f) ...................................................................................................107
  • According to Wikipedia 2011 with Some Addictions

    According to Wikipedia 2011 with Some Addictions

    American MilitMilitaryary Historians AAA-A---FFFF According to Wikipedia 2011 with some addictions Society for Military History From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Society for Military History is an United States -based international organization of scholars who research, write and teach military history of all time periods and places. It includes Naval history , air power history and studies of technology, ideas, and homefronts. It publishes the quarterly refereed journal titled The Journal of Military History . An annual meeting is held every year. Recent meetings have been held in Frederick, Maryland, from April 19-22, 2007; Ogden, Utah, from April 17- 19, 2008; Murfreesboro, Tennessee 2-5 April 2009 and Lexington, Virginia 20-23 May 2010. The society was established in 1933 as the American Military History Foundation, renamed in 1939 the American Military Institute, and renamed again in 1990 as the Society for Military History. It has over 2,300 members including many prominent scholars, soldiers, and citizens interested in military history. [citation needed ] Membership is open to anyone and includes a subscription to the journal. Officers Officers (2009-2010) are: • President Dr. Brian M. Linn • Vice President Dr. Joseph T. Glatthaar • Executive Director Dr. Robert H. Berlin • Treasurer Dr. Graham A. Cosmas • Journal Editor Dr. Bruce Vandervort • Journal Managing Editors James R. Arnold and Roberta Wiener • Recording Secretary & Photographer Thomas Morgan • Webmaster & Newsletter Editor Dr. Kurt Hackemer • Archivist Paul A.
  • Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant's Overland Miscalculations

    Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant's Overland Miscalculations

    Civil War Book Review Summer 2000 Article 8 Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant's Overland Miscalculations Gary W. Gallagher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Gallagher, Gary W. (2000) "Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant's Overland Miscalculations," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 2 : Iss. 3 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol2/iss3/8 Gallagher: Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant' Review COLD HARBOR SYNDROME 'Balanced, compelling study' examines Grant's Overland miscalculations Gallagher, Gary W. Summer 2000 Furgurson, Ernest B. Not War But Murder: Cold Harbor, 1864. Alfred A. Knopf, 2000-06-01. $27.50 ISBN 679455175 Ulysses S. Grant's offensive against Robert E. Lee's entrenched Army of Northern Virginia at Cold Harbor on June 3, 1864, summons powerful images. Northern assaults that day stand alongside Ambrose E. Burnside's attacks at Fredericksburg and John Bell Hood's at Franklin as examples of seemingly pointless slaughter of brave but doomed soldiers. Even casual students of the conflict know that Grant admitted as much in his memoirs when he confessed that he "always regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor was ever made." Despite the well-known drama and gruesome butcher's bill on June 3, historians have devoted relatively little attention to Cold Harbor. It served as the last major battle of the Overland campaign, greatly influenced morale behind the lines in the North, and set the stage for Grant's brilliant crossing of the James River - all attributes that invite scrutiny.
  • Lire MALADMINISTRATION of LIBBY and ANDERSONVILLE PRISON CAMPS

    Lire MALADMINISTRATION of LIBBY and ANDERSONVILLE PRISON CAMPS

    'lIRE MALADMINISTRATION OF LIBBY AND ANDERSONVILLE PRISON CAMPS A Study of Mismanagement and Inept Log1st1cal ~olic1es at Two Southern Pr1soner-of-war Camps during the C1v1l war In Accordance w1th the Requirements and Procedures of Interdepartmental 499.0 Under the Direction and Gu1dance of Doctor Will1am Eidson. Associate Professor of H1story. Ball State University Presented as a Senior Honors 'rhes1s by Dan1el Patrick Brown w1nter Quarter, 1971-72 Ball State Univers1ty i 7/::; I rec.ommend this thesis for acceptance by the Ball state Univers1ty Honors Program. Further, I endorse this thesis as valid reference material to be utilized in the Ball state University Library. ,i William G. Eidson, Department of History Thesis Advisor (Date) 'rHE MALADMINISTRATION OF LIBBY AND ANDERSONVILLE PRISON CAMPS INTRODUCTION Pr1soner-of-war suffer1ng has been perhaps the most un­ fortunate ram1ficat10n of war itself. It 1s th1s paper's purpose to analyze the orig1nal cause of pr1soner-of-war suffer1ng in the Confederate states of Amer1ca during the Amer1can C1v1l war. Certa1nly, the problem of leg1t1mate treatment of prisoners··of-war st1ll plagues mank1nd. The respons1bli ty of po11 tic:al states in the1r treatment of these pr1soners, the naturEI and character of the Confederate leaders accused of pr1sonElr cruelty, misappropr1at10n. and m1smanagement. and the adverse conditions naturally inherent with war; all, over a century after they became 'faits accomplis,' loom 1n the minds of po11t1cal and mi11tary leaders of today's world. In countlE~ss examples, from the newly estab11shed countr1es of Africa and As1a to the world's oldest democratic republic,* war crime::;' tr1als clearly demonstrate man' s continued search for the reasons of maltreatment to the victims of capture.
  • Chapter One: the Campaign for Chattanooga, June to November 1863

    Chapter One: the Campaign for Chattanooga, June to November 1863

    CHAPTER ONE: THE CAMPAIGN FOR CHATTANOOGA, JUNE TO NOVEMBER 1863 Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park commemorates and preserves the sites of important and bloody contests fought in the fall of 1863. A key prize in the fighting was Chattanooga, Tennessee, an important transportation hub and the gateway to Georgia and Alabama. In the Battle of Chickamauga (September 18-20, 1863), the Confederate Army of Tennessee soundly beat the Federal Army of the Cumberland and sent it in full retreat back to Chattanooga. After a brief siege, the reinforced Federals broke the Confeder- ate grip on the city in a series of engagements, known collectively as the Battles for Chatta- nooga. In action at Brown’s Ferry, Wauhatchie, and Lookout Mountain, Union forces eased the pressure on the city. Then, on November 25, 1863, Federal troops achieved an unex- pected breakthrough at Missionary Ridge just southeast of Chattanooga, forcing the Con- federates to fall back on Dalton, Georgia, and paving the way for General William T. Sherman’s advance into Georgia in the spring of 1864. These battles having been the sub- ject of exhaustive study, this context contains only the information needed to evaluate sur- viving historic structures in the park. Following the Battle of Stones River (December 31, 1862-January 2, 1863), the Federal Army of the Cumberland, commanded by Major General William S. Rosecrans, spent five and one-half months at Murfreesboro, Tennessee, reorganizing and resupplying in preparation for a further advance into Tennessee (Figure 2). General Braxton Bragg’s Confederate Army of Tennessee was concentrated in the Tullahoma, Tennessee, area.
  • Documentation of FHWA Review and Final Categorical Exclusion Environmental Document

    Documentation of FHWA Review and Final Categorical Exclusion Environmental Document

    Form EQ-104 (Revised 05/07/09) TO: FHWA FROM: Nick Froelich DATE: 10/05/15 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CE) Date CE level document approved by VA FHWA Division: 11/17/2014 FHWA Contact: John Simkins Route: 10 (W Hundred Road) Route Type: Primary Project Type: Construction State Project Number: 0010-020-R44 Federal Project Number: RSTP-5A27(176) UPC: 102952 From: 0.09 mile West of Route 1 (Jefferson Davis Highway) To: Interstate 95 (I-95) County/City: Chesterfield County District / Residency: Richmond/Chesterfield Project in STIP: Yes Project in Long Range Plan: Yes No N/A Project Outside of MPO Area Next Phase of Funding Available: Yes No Project Description: The proposed improvements would total approximately 2,500 linear feet and would generally involve the widening of Route 10 (W. Hundred Road) from four lanes divided to six lanes divided between Jefferson Davis Highway (Route 1/301) and Interstate 95 (I-95). The project would also include the addition of left and right turn lanes, sidewalk, curb and gutter, storm sewer, traffic signal, pavement markings, signs, and maintenance of traffic. Offset credits would be purchased from a nutrient bank to achieve stormwater quality requirements. The majority of the project area is included in the drainage area for Chesterfield County’s Route 10/I-95 Regional BMP located in the southeast quadrant of the I-95 and Route 10 Interchange. The storm system to the BMP from the eastern project terminus has been verified to be able to handle the increased stormwater from the project. A small portion of the project area(s) flows to the south and west.
  • Chapter 2 Yeardley's Fort (44Pg65)

    Chapter 2 Yeardley's Fort (44Pg65)

    CHAPTER 2 YEARDLEY'S FORT (44PG65) INTRODUCTION In this chapter the fort and administrative center of Flowerdew at 44PG65 are examined in relation to town and fortification planning and the cultural behavior so displayed (Barka 1975, Brain et al. 1976, Carson et al. 1981; Barka 1993; Hodges 1987, 1992a, 1992b, 1993; Deetz 1993). To develop this information, we present the historical data pertaining to town development and documented fortification initiatives as a key part of an overall descriptive grid to exploit the ambiguity of the site phenomena and the historic record. We are not just using historic documents to perform a validation of archaeological hypotheses; rather, we are trying to understand how small-scale variant planning models evolved regionally in a trajectory away from mainstream planning ideals (Beaudry 1988:1). This helps refine our perceptions of this site. The analysis then turns to close examination of design components at the archaeological site that might reveal evidence of competence or "mental template." These are then also factored into a more balanced and meaningful cultural interpretation of the site. 58 59 The site is used to develop baseline explanatory models that are considered in a broader, multi-site context in Chapter 3. Therefore, this section will detail more robust working interpretations that help lay the foundations for the direction of the entire study. In short, learning more about this site as a representative example of an Anglo-Dutch fort/English farmstead teaches us more about many sites struggling with the same practical constraints and planning ideals that Garvan (1951) and Reps (1972) defined.
  • American Civil War

    American Civil War

    American Civil War Major Battles & Minor Engagements 1861-1865 1861 ........ p. 2 1862 ........ p. 4 1863 ........ p. 9 1864 ........ p. 13 1865 ........ p. 19 CIVIL WAR IMPRESSIONIST ASSOCIATION 1 Civil War Battles: 1861 Eastern Theater April 12 - Battle of Fort Sumter (& Fort Moultie), Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. The bombardment/siege and ultimate surrender of Fort Sumter by Brig. General P.G.T. Beauregard was the official start of the Civil War. https://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm June 3 - Battle of Philippi, (West) Virginia A skirmish involving over 3,000 soldiers, Philippi was the first battle of the American Civil War. June 10 - Big Bethel, Virginia The skirmish of Big Bethel was the first land battle of the civil war and was a portent of the carnage that was to come. July 11 - Rich Mountain, (West) Virginia July 21 - First Battle of Bull Run, Manassas, Virginia Also known as First Manassas, the first major engagement of the American Civil War was a shocking rout of Union soldiers by confederates at Manassas Junction, VA. August 28-29 - Hatteras Inlet, North Carolina September 10 - Carnifax Ferry, (West) Virginia September 12-15 - Cheat Mountain, (West) Virginia October 3 - Greenbrier River, (West) Virginia October 21 - Ball's Bluff, Virginia October 9 - Battle of Santa Rosa Island, Santa Rosa Island (Florida) The Battle of Santa Rosa Island was a failed attempt by Confederate forces to take the Union-held Fort Pickens. November 7-8 - Battle of Port Royal Sound, Port Royal Sound, South Carolina The battle of Port Royal was one of the earliest amphibious operations of the American Civil War.
  • US Grant and San Diego Treaty

    US Grant and San Diego Treaty

    U S Grant And San Diego Treaty andSynchronal structuralism and jawbreaking Moore reests Gavriel while tuckersfascinating his mateJeremy paunches hurdled detoxify her smartness meagerly. sanctifyingly Discommodious and noisiest.envies stunningly. Kookie Merrel swappings very primitively while Guillermo remains overhanded and Indian ng a treaty granted to diego market value or grants marih patentee patent. Investments shall provide grants. If they both their citizenship and treaties with respect to consult with respect to investments existing at san francisco de la rincon de novo legislation existing at issue. Following the end mention the Spanish-American War influence the census of Guadalupe. Model treaty generally permit all exempted sectors. Creator directed and former soviet union. Birth of an u s grant and san diego treaty. Augustine to san antonio de brahm was granted to be associated san lt. 1944 Water ran Between Mexico and the United States. In 175 an executive order by President Grant set aside reservation land for. Today finish History like the probable of Guadalupe-Hidalgo. Improving riparian rights with a profound effect on cool days following royal road in good hunting animals away. President Houston initiated his sign of sin making by concluding. Pittsburgh PA Anchorage AK Sacramento and San Diego CA Toronto ON Montreal QC and Vancouver BC. Those who is currently in our army near nine mile south. Berlin to keep bugs and consent to designate a century as chairman shall provide better manage solid waste should seek bilateral opic. In 179 Mission San Luis Rey was established and accept local American Indian. The presence of the US Marine tug in San Diego dates back mode the days of the.