Extinction: The Historical Trope of Anti-Indigeneity in the Caribbean Dr. Maximilian C. Forte Assistant Professor Department of Sociology & Anthropology Concordia University, Montréal, Canada Paper presented at: Atlantic History: Soundings. 10th Anniversary Conference of the Atlantic History Seminar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University August 10-13, 2005. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~atlantic/program1.html Reprinted in Issues in Caribbean Amerindian Studies, Vol. VI, No. 4, August 2004-August 2005. Contact the author at:
[email protected] © Maximilian C. Forte, 2005. All rights reserved. Abstract: Several Caribbean territories have long been identified in the scholarly literature as unlikely to have retained any indigenous demographic or cultural presence stemming from either pre-colonial or early colonial times. These “unlikely places”, marked as they came to be for suffering from an absence of the autochthonous, included areas of the Greater Antilles such as Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic and as far south as Trinidad and Tobago. On the other hand, concerted ethnohistoric, archaeological and ethnographic research conducted by several scholars over the past two decades has shown that the picture of the colonial and modern Caribbean presented by European scholars and chroniclers who became influential, was far from complete or accurate. Reflecting on the problems and questions raised by new historical interpretations provides the basis for this paper as I explore the implications of this increasingly contentious debate. I take a survey approach, reviewing some of the more noteworthy findings from the research of both colleagues and myself, spanning the territories mentioned above. Having provided an overview, I will argue that “extinction” was not much more than a trope used by colonialist historiographers (and their modern successors), a standard and routine motif that has been assigned and attached to indigeneity not just in the Caribbean, but across the Americas.