Genesis of Pabloism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genesis of Pabloism The Road from the SWP to Trotskyism . .. page 2 The Faces of Economism ... page 24 NUMBER 21 FALL 1972 25 CENTS I Tile SWP tint! tile Fourtll Interntltiontl/, 1946-54: Genesis of Pabloism The American Socialist Workers Party and the European Military Policy" which called for military training under, Pabloists travelled at different rates along different paths to trade union control, implicitly posing the utopian idea that revisionism, to converge in uneasy alliance in the early 1960's U.S. workers could fight German fascism without the in an unprincipled "reunification," which has now broken existence of a workers state in the U.S., through "control­ down as the American SWP has completed the transition ling" U.S. imperialism's army. British Trotskyist Ted Grant from Pabloist centrism to outright reformism. The "United went even further, in one speech referring to British Secretariat" which issued out of the 1963 "reunification" imperialism's armed forces as "our Eighth Army." The teeters on the edge of an open split; the "anti-revisionist" German IKD returned to outright Menshevism with the "International Committee" fractured last year. The collapse the'ory that fascism had brought about the need for "an of the various competing pretenders to the mantle of the intermediate stage fundamentally equivalent to a democratic Fourth International provides a crucial opportunity for the revolution." ("Three Theses;' 19 October 1941) reemergence of an authentic Trotskyist international tenden­ The French Trotskyist movement, fragmented during the cy. Key to the task of reconstructing the Fourth Internation­ course of the war, was the best example of the contradiction. al through a process of splits and fusions is an understanding One of its fragments subordinated the mobilization of the of the char'acteristics and causes of Pabloist revisionism and working class to the political appetites of the Gaullist wing of the flawed response of the anti-Pabloists who fought, too th~ imperialist bourgeoisie; another grouping'renounced any little and too late, on national terrain while in practice struggle within the resistance movement in favor of work abandoning the world movement. exclusively at the point of production and, not recognizing World War II: U.S. and France the existing level' of reformist consciousness among the workers, adventurously attempted to seize the factories Before the onset of the war, Trotsky and the Fourth during the "liberation" of Paris while the working masses International had believed that decaying capitalism and the were out on the streets. The February 1944 European rise of fascism removed the possibility, for reformism and Conference document which was the basis for a fusion therefore for bourgeois-democratic illusions among the between two French groupings to form the Parti Com­ masses. Yeti they could not but become Increasingly aware muniste Internationaliste characterized the two groups: that the revulsion of the working class against fascism and the threat of fascist occupation gave rise to social chauvinism "Instead of distinguishing between the natioO'alism of the defeated bourgeoisie which remains an expression of its and a renewal of confidence in the "democratic" bourgeoisie imperialist preoccupations, and the 'nationalism' of the permeating the proletarian masses throughout Europe and the masses which is only a reactionary expression of their U.S. Faced with such a contradiction, the powerful pressures resistance against exploitation by the occupying imperial­ of nationalist backwardness and democratic illusions in the ism, the leadership of the POI considered as progressive working class tended to pull the sections of the Fourth' the struggle of its own bourgeoisie ...." International apart, some adopting a sectarian stance, others "the CCI ... under the pretext of guarding intact the capitulating to the social patriotism which was rampant heritage of Marxism-Leninism, refused obstinately to among the masses. The SWP briefly adopted the "Proletarian (Continued on page 4) The Case of Bola Tampoe Suppressed Documents Expose United Secretariat PAGE 14 2 SPARTACIST .. The Road from the SWP to Trotskyism Resignations from 14 August 1972 Political Committee, Socialist Workers Party National Executive Committee, the SWP·YSA Young Socialist Alliance We, the undersigned, hereby reSign from the SWP The statement of resignation from the Socialist Workers and the YSA. We take this step as the culmination of Party in favor of a fusion perspective with the Spartacist our previous(v declared support within the SWP to the League, printed immediately below, is from comrades who Declaration of the Leninist Faction of 15 May 1972 have made the difficult transition from the reformism of the or, in the case of the YSA member, of our present solidarity with the politics of that Declaration. SWP to Trotskyism. They originated out of the complex pro­ 1n accordance with the programmatic parallelism cess around the last SWP Convention (August 1971). Two of our political position with that of the Spartacist left oppositions emerged in that Convention period: the LeagtJe of the U.s., and as principled and serious Communist Tendency' in Boston, a handful associated with revolutionists, we intend to seek fusion with the SL. one David Fender, and the much looser Proletarian Orienta­ We call upon all others in basic agreement with our tion tendency which amassed perhaps a hundred supporters views to adopt the same perspective. by Convention time. The CT took a more left-wing and multi­ faceted stance; the PO as its name implies centered upon in­ Fraternally, volving the SWP in the working-class movem~nt. After the Paul A., SWP (Washington D.C), Convention the PO formally dissolved and in fact began dis­ Jeff B., SWP (Oakland-Berkeley; integrating even before the post-Convention period. Of the Dave P., SWP (Washington, D.C) older more prominent individuals drawn to or associated Martha P., SWP (Washington, D.C) with the PO (Larry Turner, Hedda Garza, Harry DeBoer, Paul Ron P., YSA (New York City) Boutelle), most simply capitulated to the party majority. The surviving right PO elements headed by Ralph Lewis seem to place their future hopes on the centrist ~uropean United Sec­ elements who presumably think all the Chinese are simply retariat in the latter's incipient rupture with the reformist Stalinist totalitarians but that probably it is not very im­ American SWP. The more radical left PO elements around portant since it is not an American question. Just before Barbara Gregorich formally constituted a "Leninist Faction" picking up Fender who is some kind of extreme "socialist" within the SWP. militarist i.e. an enthusiast of his own version of an ultra Meanwhile Fender and the CT early got themselves Proletarian Military Policy, Turner had fortuitously broken, thrown out of the SWP, then split from each other. The CT, over questions of international maneuvering, with a "social­ after a weeks-long attempt to conquer the American prole­ ist" draft dodger, Bob Sherwood, resident in Canada. But tariat. independently as the "Committee for a Workers Gov­ Turner-Fender do have a principled basis of a sort for their ernment," liquidated into the third-camp International So­ amalgam: Turner's VNL had gone along with support to the cialists, though not without swearing to all and sundry that New York cops' strike (Turner was chasing the strongly pro­ they have not sold out but are rather on a vicious wrecking cop Workers League at the time) while most recently Fender Trotskyite entry. Fender has signed on as co-editor of Harry as a VNL representative precipitated the forcible opening by rumer's "Vanguard Newsletter" to produce one of the more campus cops of a WL "public" meeting in St: Louis where, as rotten little blocs of all time. The VNL is not only non­ usual, the WL was forcibly excluding known radical op­ democratic-centralist itself 'Iut projects and seeks to work ponents. through its "Committees for Rank and File Caucuses," a hy­ The record of the attempt of elements standing between pothetical united front in willful substitution for the aim of the reformism of the "Trotskyist" SWP and the revolutionary a Leninist party. The record of the combined VNL-CRFC Marxism of the Trotskyist Spartacist League to transcend crew to date, to take the China question for example, is the their centrist limitations ranges in the main from the pathetic "unity" of the pro-Maoist Turner and the pro-Liu Shao-chiist to the sordid. Fender, along with the sometime inclusion of the self-styled The most characteristic nostrum seen as an antidote to left pr.o-Lin Piaoist Bob Ross. In addition the CRFC swamp the SWP's revisionism is a particularly trivial species of work­ encompasses "Socialist Forum," some semi-ex-DeLeonist erism. Real revolutionary syndicalists, while they believe in FALL 1972 3 homogeneous Fourth International (World Party of Socialist Revolution), but five separate international groups all claiming to be either the Fourth International itself, or SPARTACJ5T separate "factions" of it. The shattering of the Fourth Inter­ (Fourth Internationalist) national originally constructed by Trotsky, Cannon, Sedov, Klement, and othe-rs had its basis in the isolation from the An Organ of Revolutionary Marxism working masses aftel World War II, and the methodology and EDITORS: Mallaging, Elizabeth Gordon; James Robertson; positions adopted at the Third World Congress in 1951. Joseph Seymour. At the Third World Congress, adaptation to non-revolu­ BUSINESS MANAGER: Anne Kelley. tionary currents took place, which resulted in the adoption Main address: Box 1377, G.P.O., New York, N. Y. 10001. Tele· of positions which negated the need for the Leninist vanguard phone: WA 5-2426. Western address: P.O. Box 852, Berkeley, party. These positions, based on impressionism and empiri­ Calif. 94701. Telephone: 848·3029. Southern address: Box 51634, Main P.O., New Orleans, La. 70151. Telephone: 866-8384.
Recommended publications
  • The Politics of the Militant Tendency
    18 August 1982 Marxism Today Witch-hunts are the last thing the Labour Party needs: yet the politics of Militant are a blind alley for the Left. John Callaghan The Politics of the Militant Tendency The recent decision by the Labour Party open debate. If the ideology and political Socialist Fight was replaced by The Militant National Executive Committee to establish practice of the Militant Tendency are char­ in 1963; but, more fundamentally, from a register of organised groups within the acterised by major shortcomings they will being an integrated group of entrists in ranks of the party is generally acknowledged not be any less significant merely because 1955, the Revolutionary Socialist League to be a move against the Militant Tendency. the Labour Right draws attention to them gradually gave way to the much looser form It is possible that this decision may, by Sep­ while the Left remains silent. which is today's Militant Tendency. This tember, result in the expulsion of leading consists of a small centralised leadership figures from the group. The Labour Party Origins and nature echelon around Ted Grant, who control and has on many previous occasions taken such of the Militant Tendency1 own The Militant, supported by the bulk of repressive action against dissident — espe­ The Militant Tendency originated with a the Labour Party Young Socialist organ- cially Marxist — factions within the party tiny group of Trotskyists led by Ted Grant. istion and those who are prepared to sell the and its youth section. But the extraordinary From the mid-50s this group — known as newspaper in the parent organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Week School on Political Issues from the History of AWL
    Week school on political issues from the history of AWL Day One Session: Heterodox, orthodox, and “orthodox Mark 2” 1. Why we started: 1966-8 Trotskyism: http://www.workersliberty.org//taxonomy/term/555 http://www.workersliberty.org/wwaawwmb The AWL's tradition: http://www.workersliberty.org/node/5146 Session: Party and perspectives What happened in 1968 and how the left responded ***************** Why we fused with IS (SWP) Timeline 2. Ireland: 1968-71 1964 July 2: After years of civil rights agitation in USA, Civil Rights http://www.workersliberty.org/node/10010 Act becomes law. October 15: Labour wins general election, after 13 years of Session: The debates in 1969 - “withdraw subsidies”, Tory rule “southern arsenals”, “troops out” before August 1969, “Catholic economism” and transitional demands, “troops out” 1965 in August 1969. January 31: USA starts bombing of North Vietnam. Vietnam war, and movement against it, escalate. Day Two February: SLL, then biggest revolutionary group in Britain, launches its own independent "Young Socialists" as a 3. The Tories and Labour 1970-4 response to limited expulsions by Labour Party after SLL wins majority in Labour youth movement. Session: General strike Our Labour Party debate then: syndicalism, economism, and 1966 politics Summer: Beginning of "Cultural Revolution" in China: a faction of the bureaucracy mobilises gangs to purge rivals 4. Stalinism 1968-75 reinforce autarkic, ultra-statist policy. But many leftists in the West will admire the "Cultural Revolution"; Maoism will Session: Czechoslovakia 1968 be a big force on the revolutionary left from 1968 to the “Soviet dissidents” mid-70s, though less so in Britain than in other European Vietnam and Cambodia 1975 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Hansen Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf78700585 No online items Register of the Joseph Hansen papers Finding aid prepared by Joseph Hansen Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6003 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1998, 2006, 2012 Register of the Joseph Hansen 92035 1 papers Title: Joseph Hansen papers Date (inclusive): 1887-1980 Collection Number: 92035 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 109 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 3 envelopes, 1 audio cassette(46.2 linear feet) Abstract: Speeches and writings, correspondence, notes, minutes, reports, internal bulletins, resolutions, theses, printed matter, sound recording, and photographs relating to Leon Trotsky, activities of the Socialist Workers Party in the United States, and activities of the Fourth International in Latin America, Western Europe and elsewhere. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Hansen, Joseph, Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Joseph Hansen papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1992. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu . Materials have been added to the collection if the number of boxes listed in the online catalog is larger than the number of boxes listed in this finding aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya, Anti-Imperialism, and the Socialist Party
    Published on Workers' Liberty (http://www.workersliberty.org) Libya, anti-imperialism, and the Socialist Party By Sean Matgamna This is a copy-edited and slightly expanded version of the text printed in WL 3/34 Libya, anti-imperialism, and the Socialist Party Did Taaffe equate the Libyan rebels with the Nicaraguan contras? [3] Anything other than "absolute opposition" means support? [4] Intellectual hooliganism and AWL's "evasions" [5] What is more important in the situation than stopping massacre? [6] Bishop Taaffe and imperialism [7] What is the "anti-imperialist" programme in today's world? [8] From semi-colony to regional power [9] Taaffe's record as an anti-imperialist [10] The separation of AWL and the Socialist Party [11] Militant in the mid 1960s [12] How did we come to break with Militant? Anti-union laws [13] What is a Marxist perspective? [14] Peaceful revolution [15] Our general critique of Militant's politics [16] "We can't discuss what Grant and Taaffe can't reply to" [17] The US in Iraq and union freedoms [18] Socialists and the European Union [19] Toadying to Bob Crow [20] Ireland: why socialists must have a democratic programme [21] Conclusion: Pretension [22] Appendix: Militant and the Labour Party, 1969-87 - a strange symbiosis [23] What We Are And What We Must Become: critique of Militant, written in 1966, which became the founding document of the AWL tendency, is available at http://www.workersliberty.org/wwaawwmb The RSL (Militant) in the 1960s: a study of passivity: an account of how What We Are And What We Must Become came to be written, and the battle around its ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for the Labour Party but from The
    Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Nicolas Sigoillot To cite this version: Nicolas Sigoillot. Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Ob- jectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2020, XXV (3), 10.4000/rfcb.5873. hal-03250124 HAL Id: hal-03250124 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03250124 Submitted on 4 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents:
    [Show full text]
  • No. 202, Spring, 2008
    No 202 SPRING 2008 40p Newspaper of the Spartacist League hina is not capitalist Siemens Metals and Mining China Photos Left: Baosteel plant in Shangl).ai, part of China's collectivised industry. Right: Workers demonstrate outside paper products factory to demand back pay, Shenzhen, China, October 2007. ';;~'~.jtDlltariaIl8.lIt1c.I"'".lud.nl~ ." . ." .' , . {.- .... ',' " "- In the run-up to the Beijing Olympics Tories and from none other than heir to racist and repressive overseers, holding been drawn ever more into the cross­ in August there is a growing crescendo of the British throne, Prince Charles, who the island as a protectorate until it was hairs of the imperialists since the coun­ imperialist anti-Communism against the happens to be a long-time friend of the rightfully returned to the People's terrevolutionary destruction of the de­ Chinese deformed workers state, pro­ counterrevolutionary Tibetan "God Republic of China in 1997. As in the formed workers states of Eastern moted by the Labour government and King". Cold War against the Soviet Union, Europe and, in particular, the destruc­ echoed by the reformist left. There has Despite their differences, the aim of what the imperialists understand by tion of the Soviet degenerated workers been a military build-up against China by all the imperialist powers towards the "human rights" above all is one thing: state in 1991-92. As a result of the US and Japanese imperialism and a bar­ People's Republic of China is to destroy the right of the bourgeoisie to unlimited treacherous Stalinist policy of "social­ rage of China-bashing that ranges from the workers state by counterrevolution.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea and the Theory of the Deformed Workers' State
    North Korea and the Theory of the Deformed Workers’ State: Definitions and First Principles of a Fourth International Theory Alzo David-West James P. Cannon, Peng Shuzi, Pierre Frank, Michel Pablo, Ernest Mandel, and Tim Wohlforth Abstract This essay examines the academically neglected theory of the deformed workers’ state in relation to the political character of the North Korean state. Developed by leaders of the Fourth International, the world party of socialism founded by exiled Russian Bolshevik revolutionary Leon Trotsky, the theory classifies the national states that arose under post- Second World War Soviet Army occupation as bureaucratic, hybrid, transitional formations that imitated the Soviet Stalinist system. The author reviews the origin of the theory, explores its political propositions and apparent correspondences in the North Korean case, and concludes with some hypotheses and suggestions for further research. Copyright © 2012 by Alzo David-West and Cultural Logic, ISSN 1097-3087 Alzo David-West 2 Introduction On the centenary of the birth of Kim Il Sung in 2012, North Korea entered a period officially designated as “opening the gate to a great prosperous and powerful socialist nation.” Coming after the post-Soviet rise of markets within a planned economy, the initiation of capitalist Special Economic Zones in the early 1990s and 2000s, market- oriented economic and currency reforms in 2002, and the dropping of “communism” from the 2009 revised constitution, the reference to present-day North Korea as a “socialist nation” is evidently more symbolic than substantial. Still, over sixty years after the founding of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) on 9 September 1948, the political character of the North Korean state remains a more or less unresolved issue in North Korean studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism and the National Question
    Marxism and the National Question Alan Woods and Ted Grant Marxism and the National Question Alan Woods and Ted Grant, 25 February 2000 A 4 part document by Alan Woods and Ted Grant. The question of nationalities has always occupied a central position in Marxist theory. In particular, the writings of Lenin deal Image: public domain with this important issue in great detail. It is true to say that, without a correct appraisal of the national question, the Bolsheviks would never have succeeded in coming to power in 1917. This document reviews the rich Marxist literature on this issue and applies it to today's conditions. Part One: The national question in history Introduction The question of nationalities—that is, the oppression of nations and national minorities—which has characterised capitalism from its birth till the present time, has always occupied a central position in Marxist theory. In particular, the writings of Lenin deal with this important issue in great detail, and still provide us with a sound foundation to deal with this most complicated and explosive issue. It is true to say that, without a correct appraisal of the national question, the Bolsheviks would never have succeeded in coming to power in 1917. Only by placing itself at the head of all oppressed layers of society could the proletariat unite under the banner of socialism the mass forces necessary to overthrow the rule of the oppressors. Failure to appreciate the problems and aspirations of the oppressed nationalities of the tsarist empire would have undermined the revolutionary struggle of the proletariat severely.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defence of Trotskyism No. 6
    In Defence of Trotskyism No. 6 £1 waged, 50p unwaged/low waged, €1.50 The Marxist theory of the state: Deformed and Degenerated Workers’ States and Capitalist States Reply to RCIT Part 3 (assessment also of the positions of Workers Power/LFI, Ted Grant and the Socialist Party/CWI, Socialist Appeal/ IMT, the Spart family ICL/IBT/IG, Mandelites/USFI/US SWP, David North’s SEP/WSWS/ICFI and a passing look at the Cliffite UK SWP). Berlin Airlift-June 24, 1948 to May 12, 1949 and debate on Buffer States Page 2 The Marxist theory of the state Where We Stand ets/workers’ councils to sup- reformist leaders of the Labour press the inevitable counter- party and trade unions 1. WE STAND WITH revolution of private capitalist 5. We oppose all immigra- KARL MARX: ‘The emancipa- profit against planned produc- tion controls. International tion of the working classes must tion for the satisfaction of so- finance capital roams the planet be conquered by the working cialised human need. in search of profit and Imperial- classes themselves. The struggle 3. We recognise the necessity ist governments disrupts the for the emancipation of the for revolutionaries to carry out lives of workers and cause the working class means not a serious ideological and political collapse of whole nations with struggle for class privileges and struggle as direct participants in their direct intervention in the monopolies but for equal rights the trade unions (always) and in Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan and duties and the abolition of the mass reformist social demo- and their proxy wars in Somalia all class rule’ (The International cratic bourgeois workers’ parties and the Democratic Republic of Workingmen’s Association despite their pro-capitalist lead- the Congo, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capitalist Crisis and How to Beat It Dave Packer and Fred Leplat
    FromFrom BoomBoom toto Bust!Bust! TheThe capitalistcapitalist crisiscrisis andand howhow toto beatbeat it.it. A Socialist Resistance pamphlet 1 Resistance Books Ecosocialism or Barbarism A collection of important contributions to the debate on ecology and global warming, and the limits of capitalism’s ability to control the resulting destruction of the environ- ment. This reprinted second edition is essential reading for anyone getting to grips with ecosocialism . £6 Ireland’s Credit Crunch The crisis of the Irish economy coincides with the latest title from Resistance Books: Ireland’s Credit Crunch. Written by three leading members of the Fourth Interna- tional in Ireland the book outlines the roots of the crisis, and how to fight it. They discuss the roots of the current crisis, the unprecedented scale of the threat to workers in Ireland and Europe and details of the programme that workers should advance to build a real alternative to the economic famine they are facing. £6 Building Unity Against Fascism:Classic Marxist Writings This new book gathers together classic Marxist writings from the 1920s to the 1940s Leon Trotsky’s “Fascism: What It Is and How To Fight It”, Maurice Spector’s detailed analysis of German fascism in power Daniel Guérin’s 1939 “Fascism and Big Business” Ted Grant’s booklet, “The Menace of Fascism” and much more £5 This is just a small selection of the many titles published by Resistance Books . To order send cheques, made out to “Resistance” to PO Box 63732, London, SW29GQ. To order online visit paypal.com and send a payment to [email protected] stating clearly the book title(s) you want .
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of the International Marxist Tendency and the Venezuelan Revo- Lutionary Marxist Tendency (CMR) for the VI World Social Forum
    Statement of the International Marxist Tendency and the Venezuelan Revo- lutionary Marxist Tendency (CMR) for the VI World Social Forum The VI World Social Forum and II Forum of perialism, the looters of Venezuela’s wealth and those the Americas are meeting again, this time in Venezu- responsible for their misery and oppression. The Ven- ela, where those who are fighting for a better world ezuelan workers and peasants have been able to stop can debate and make proposals to transform society. successive attempts of reaction and imperialism to put an end to the revolution and to overthrow the govern- Since the previous Social Forum, which took ment of president Chavez. place in Porto Alegre, the general crisis of capitalism has not stopped but has actually deepened. For this The masses defeated the coup in 2002, chased reason the search for an alternative to the capitalist Carmona from the Miraflores Palace and brought back system is needed, to oppose the dictatorship of the president Chavez. In the same year, the Venezuelan multinationals, the destruction of the environment, the working class defeated the sabotage of the oil indus- misery and war created by capitalism that is imposed try instigated by imperialism and carried out by the on workers, the oppressed and poor around the world. bosses’ organization Fedecamaras, together with the corrupt and rotten leaders of the CTV. Is a better world possible, a world without misery, exploitation and where humanity can live in Despite the fact that president Chavez’s gov- peace, plenty and harmony? Or is it a pointless utopia ernment has held numerous elections in the last six to aspire to such a society? years and has received the overwhelming support of the population in each one of them, US imperial- In our opinion the answer is yes, another world ism has tried to create the impression that this is an is possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Illusions of Power Ratecapping
    Illusions of Power Ratecapping: What went wrong? Hilda Kean, who resigned as leader of Hackney council when the council decided to knuckle under to the Tories, analyses the ratecapping battle. A recall Labour Party local government conference was held in Sheffield last summer before it was known which councils would be rate capped, and we discussed a national policy there. A very good policy was passed at the Labour Party conference last autumn. It emphasised non-compliance with the Rates Act and the need to defeat it in its first year. The problem was not the policy but how it was implemented. There was just no support from Neil Kinnock for the policy that was agreed at Labour Party conference. As soon as the list of rate-capped authorities was announced, it was clear that it would be very difficult to have total unity. Apart from political differences there were also real differences in their economic situation between councils like Basildon and Thamesdown, and those like Hackney and Lambeth, Then there were councils and councillors who saw themselves very much in the traditional mould of Labour local government-just looking towards protest publicity campaigns-and a minority who have seen ourselves as campaigning in a different way, not within the framework simply of the council chamber. There were lots of reasons for the campaign petering out. The first thing, of course, was the miners' strike. The decisive phase of the campaign against rate-capping took place after the defeat of the miners' strike. The particular tactic adopted by the councils also led to problems-the tactic led to problems-the tactic of not setting a rate, or rather deferring a rate.
    [Show full text]