DOCSLIB.ORG

In Defence of Trotskyism No. 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Defence of Trotskyism No. 6 In Defence of Trotskyism No. 6 £1 waged, 50p unwaged/low waged, €1.50 The Marxist theory of the state: Deformed and Degenerated Workers’ States and Capitalist States Reply to RCIT Part 3 (assessment also of the positions of Workers Power/LFI, Ted Grant and the Socialist Party/CWI, Socialist Appeal/ IMT, the Spart family ICL/IBT/IG, Mandelites/USFI/US SWP, David North’s SEP/WSWS/ICFI and a passing look at the Cliffite UK SWP). Berlin Airlift-June 24, 1948 to May 12, 1949 and debate on Buffer States Page 2 The Marxist theory of the state Where We Stand ets/workers’ councils to sup- reformist leaders of the Labour press the inevitable counter- party and trade unions 1. WE STAND WITH revolution of private capitalist 5. We oppose all immigra- KARL MARX: ‘The emancipa- profit against planned produc- tion controls. International tion of the working classes must tion for the satisfaction of so- finance capital roams the planet be conquered by the working cialised human need. in search of profit and Imperial- classes themselves. The struggle 3. We recognise the necessity ist governments disrupts the for the emancipation of the for revolutionaries to carry out lives of workers and cause the working class means not a serious ideological and political collapse of whole nations with struggle for class privileges and struggle as direct participants in their direct intervention in the monopolies but for equal rights the trade unions (always) and in Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan and duties and the abolition of the mass reformist social demo- and their proxy wars in Somalia all class rule’ (The International cratic bourgeois workers’ parties and the Democratic Republic of Workingmen’s Association despite their pro-capitalist lead- the Congo, etc. Workers have 1864, General Rules). erships when conditions are the right to sell their labour 2. The capitalist state con- favourable. Because we see the internationally wherever they sists, in the last analysis, of trade union bureaucracy and get the best price. Only union ruling-class laws within a judicial their allies in the Labour party membership and pay rates can system and detention centres leadership as the most funda- counter employers who seek to overseen by the armed bodies mental obstacle to the struggle exploit immigrant workers as of police/army who are under for power of the working class, cheap labour to undermine the the direction and are controlled outside of the state forces and gains of past struggles. in acts of defence of capitalist their direct agencies themselves, property rights against the inter- we must fight and defeat and ests of the majority of civil replace them with a revolution- Subscribe to Socialist Fight society. The working class must ary leadership by mobilising the and In Defence of Trotskyism overthrow the capitalist state base against the pro-capitalist and replace it with a workers’ bureaucratic misleaders to open Four Issues: UK: £12.00, EU: state based on democratic sovi- the way forward for the struggle £14.00 for workers’ power. Rest of the World: £18.00 Socialist Fight produces IDOT. 4. We are fully in support of Please send donations to help It is a part of the Liaison Com- all mass mobilisations against in their production mittee for the Fourth Interna- the onslaught of this reactionary Cheques and Standing Orders Con-Lib Dem coalition. How- to tional with the Liga Comunista, ever, whilst participating in this Brazil and the Tendencia Mili- struggle we will oppose all poli- Socialist Fight Account No. 1 tante Bolchevique, Argentina. cies which subordinate the Unity Trust Bank, Sort Code Editor: Gerry Downing working class to the political 08-60-01, Account. No. Assistant Editor: John Barry. agenda of the petty-bourgeois 20227368. Introduction IG and Workers Power/LFI, who parted This is the third part of a reply to the Austri- company with the RCIT just a few years ago. an-based Revolutionary Communist Interna- We also looked at the history of Ted Grant tional Tendency (RCIT) on a wide range of and his successor groups because these have political and historical issues that have been been neglected by left Trotskyists for far too controversial in the history of Trotskyism. In long. Other groups are dealt with as occasion tackling these issues we found it necessary to arises during the polemic. This publication address the whole history of Trotskyism and concentrates on the Marxist position on the how various groupings saw it. In particular state. we addressed the ‘left-Trotskyist’, groupings, The post WWII debate in the Fourth Inter- the Spart ‘family’, the ICL, the IBT and the national of the late 1940s and early 1950s on Socialist Fight: PO Box 59188, London, NW2 9LJ, [email protected]. The Marxist theory of the state Page 3 the class character of the ‘Buffer States’ in on this Eastern Europe was resurrected in 1989-92 question. with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the col- And also lapse of the USSR following the Yanayev the politics coup and Yeltsin’s counter-coup of August of the 1991. We will see from the struggles we have I n t e r n a - outlined below that the Stalinist bureaucra- tional Bol- cies became divided into three camps follow- s h e v i k ing the defeat of the Brezhnevites by Gorba- Tendency chev in 1989; those Gorbechevites on the left (IBT) as it who wished to retain the degenerate and intervened deformed workers’ states by opening up the in these economic plan by glasnost (openness) and events. But perestroika (restructuring), those in the mid- first we dle (Yanayev and Deng in China) who sought will look at the restoration of capitalism by slow, planned Grantism measures, maintaining the Stalinist bureau- and the cracy as the vehicle of restoration and those state, its prime revision of Marxism as identi- on the right like Yeltsin who sought a rapid fied by almost every other far left group. capitulation to western Imperialism and their own enrichment by plundering the state as- Problems of Grantism On The sets in alliance with western transnational State corporations. We can observe at least ele- The problems of Grantism on the state go ments of these three tendencies in most of back at least to 1949 [1] when Ted Grant the counter-revolutionary overturns of 1989- wrote his Reply to David Jamesin which his 92. erroneous theory of Proletarian Bonapartism The first debate on the nature of the East first made its debut, as far as we know: European countries behind the ‘iron curtain’ “Stalinism is a form of Bonapartism that ba- in the FI in the late 1940s eventually resulted ses itself on the proletariat and the institution in the correct conclusion that they were de- of state ownership, but it is as different from formed workers’ states, but much confusion the norm of a workers’ state as fascism or remained. We will look at the position again bourgeois Bonapartism differs from the as it emerged in the debate over the class norm of bourgeois democracy, which is the character of Cuba in the early 1960s and the freest expression of the economic domina- debate about the class character of Cambodia tion and rule of the bourgeoisie. Now it in the late 1970s following the invasion by seems that Stalinism, once having become Vietnam on 25 December 1978. And of the government, is based on the proletariat course, as we have mentioned, the debate because it is based on proletarian property following the victory of the counter- forms, “the institutions of state ownership”. revolutionary restoration of capitalism in Thus it has ceased being counterrevolution- Eastern European and Asian states in the late ary in NATURE because it has performed a 1980s and early 1990s. progressive historical act. The confusion here We will look at the politics of Workers Pow- is between its essential class character and its er Britain (WPB) and Ted Grant’s groups manoeuvres. Stalinism, leaning on the prole- (CWI and IMT today) as it manifested itself Socialist Fight: PO Box 59188, London, NW2 9LJ, [email protected]. Page 4 The Marxist theory of the state tariat can, under given conditions, balance not an owner of enterprises, but only an in- between the opposing classes to strengthen termediary between their owners. These two itself for its own ends. We have seen how things are not identical. Popolo d’Italia says this was accomplished in Eastern Europe. on this subject: “The corporative state directs We now have a similar development taking and integrates the economy, but does not run place before our eyes in China.” [2] it (‘dirige e porta alla unita l’economia, ma Stalinism was and is not really “leaning on non fa l’economia, non gestisce’), which, with the proletariat” at all but using the working a monopoly of production, would be nothing class threat to lean essentially if indirectly on but collectivism.” (June 11, 1936) Toward the Imperialism and far more directly on the peasants and small proprietors in general, the peasantry to accomplish this. However the fascist bureaucracy takes the attitude of a above quote is also wrong because it directly threatening lord and master. Toward the equates the assumption of state power by the capitalist magnates, that of a first plenipoten- Stalinists with “the institutions of state own- tiury. “The corporative state,”correctly writes ership”, as if that represented a deformed the Italian Marxist, Feroci, “is nothing but workers’ state. In fact this phrase does not the sales clerk of monopoly capital … Mus- define any real Marxist scientific category at solini takes upon the state the whole risk of all.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Charlie Van Gelderen (1913-2001)
    Charlie van Gelderen (1913-2001) https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article546 Obituary Charlie van Gelderen (1913-2001) - IV Online magazine - 2001 - IV336 - December 2001 - Publication date: Monday 10 December 2001 Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - All rights reserved Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine Page 1/3 Charlie van Gelderen (1913-2001) Charlie van Gelderen was the last survivor of those who attended the 1938 Founding Conference of the Fourth International in Paris. He attended as an observer on behalf of South African Trotskyists, though he was already living in Britain by that time. He died peacefully at home in Cambridge on October 26 after a short illness at the age of 88, still a fully paid up and until very recently an active member of the International Socialist Group (British section of the Fourth International). Charlie was born in August 1913 in the small town of Wellington, 40 miles from Cape Town, South Africa. He became politically active as a young man, initially joining the Fabian Society, but in 1931 he became an enthusiastic supporter of the ideas of Leon Trotsky. Together with his twin brother, Herman, he was instrumental in setting up the first Trotskyist organisation in South Africa, the International Marxist League. Charlie was also involved in setting up the Commercial Workers Union in the Cape and for a time became its full time secretary. The South African Trotskyist movement split in 1932 in response to the "French turn", the position put forward by Trotsky at the time urging his French supporters to enter the French Socialist Party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the Militant Tendency
    18 August 1982 Marxism Today Witch-hunts are the last thing the Labour Party needs: yet the politics of Militant are a blind alley for the Left. John Callaghan The Politics of the Militant Tendency The recent decision by the Labour Party open debate. If the ideology and political Socialist Fight was replaced by The Militant National Executive Committee to establish practice of the Militant Tendency are char­ in 1963; but, more fundamentally, from a register of organised groups within the acterised by major shortcomings they will being an integrated group of entrists in ranks of the party is generally acknowledged not be any less significant merely because 1955, the Revolutionary Socialist League to be a move against the Militant Tendency. the Labour Right draws attention to them gradually gave way to the much looser form It is possible that this decision may, by Sep­ while the Left remains silent. which is today's Militant Tendency. This tember, result in the expulsion of leading consists of a small centralised leadership figures from the group. The Labour Party Origins and nature echelon around Ted Grant, who control and has on many previous occasions taken such of the Militant Tendency1 own The Militant, supported by the bulk of repressive action against dissident — espe­ The Militant Tendency originated with a the Labour Party Young Socialist organ- cially Marxist — factions within the party tiny group of Trotskyists led by Ted Grant. istion and those who are prepared to sell the and its youth section. But the extraordinary From the mid-50s this group — known as newspaper in the parent organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis of Pabloism
    The Road from the SWP to Trotskyism . .. page 2 The Faces of Economism ... page 24 NUMBER 21 FALL 1972 25 CENTS I Tile SWP tint! tile Fourtll Interntltiontl/, 1946-54: Genesis of Pabloism The American Socialist Workers Party and the European Military Policy" which called for military training under, Pabloists travelled at different rates along different paths to trade union control, implicitly posing the utopian idea that revisionism, to converge in uneasy alliance in the early 1960's U.S. workers could fight German fascism without the in an unprincipled "reunification," which has now broken existence of a workers state in the U.S., through "control­ down as the American SWP has completed the transition ling" U.S. imperialism's army. British Trotskyist Ted Grant from Pabloist centrism to outright reformism. The "United went even further, in one speech referring to British Secretariat" which issued out of the 1963 "reunification" imperialism's armed forces as "our Eighth Army." The teeters on the edge of an open split; the "anti-revisionist" German IKD returned to outright Menshevism with the "International Committee" fractured last year. The collapse the'ory that fascism had brought about the need for "an of the various competing pretenders to the mantle of the intermediate stage fundamentally equivalent to a democratic Fourth International provides a crucial opportunity for the revolution." ("Three Theses;' 19 October 1941) reemergence of an authentic Trotskyist international tenden­ The French Trotskyist movement, fragmented during the cy. Key to the task of reconstructing the Fourth Internation­ course of the war, was the best example of the contradiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Week School on Political Issues from the History of AWL
    Week school on political issues from the history of AWL Day One Session: Heterodox, orthodox, and “orthodox Mark 2” 1. Why we started: 1966-8 Trotskyism: http://www.workersliberty.org//taxonomy/term/555 http://www.workersliberty.org/wwaawwmb The AWL's tradition: http://www.workersliberty.org/node/5146 Session: Party and perspectives What happened in 1968 and how the left responded ***************** Why we fused with IS (SWP) Timeline 2. Ireland: 1968-71 1964 July 2: After years of civil rights agitation in USA, Civil Rights http://www.workersliberty.org/node/10010 Act becomes law. October 15: Labour wins general election, after 13 years of Session: The debates in 1969 - “withdraw subsidies”, Tory rule “southern arsenals”, “troops out” before August 1969, “Catholic economism” and transitional demands, “troops out” 1965 in August 1969. January 31: USA starts bombing of North Vietnam. Vietnam war, and movement against it, escalate. Day Two February: SLL, then biggest revolutionary group in Britain, launches its own independent "Young Socialists" as a 3. The Tories and Labour 1970-4 response to limited expulsions by Labour Party after SLL wins majority in Labour youth movement. Session: General strike Our Labour Party debate then: syndicalism, economism, and 1966 politics Summer: Beginning of "Cultural Revolution" in China: a faction of the bureaucracy mobilises gangs to purge rivals 4. Stalinism 1968-75 reinforce autarkic, ultra-statist policy. But many leftists in the West will admire the "Cultural Revolution"; Maoism will Session: Czechoslovakia 1968 be a big force on the revolutionary left from 1968 to the “Soviet dissidents” mid-70s, though less so in Britain than in other European Vietnam and Cambodia 1975 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Goerge Lavan Weissman Papers
    George Lavan Weissman Collection Papers, 1935-1985 3 linear feet 3 storage boxes Accession #1347 DALNET # OCLC # George Lavan Weissman was born in Chicago in 1916 and grew up in Boston, where he attended Boston Latin School and Harvard College. While at Harvard during the Great Depression, he became a Marxist, joined the Young People’s Socialist League and the Socialist Party and volunteered as an organizer for several labor unions in New England. Weissman followed the Trotskyists out of the SP after their expulsion in 1937 and helped found the Socialist Workers Party and the Fourth International in 1938. He married fellow SWP activist, Constance Fox Harding, in 1943. As a self-described “party functionary,” Weissman was a branch organizer in Boston (1939-41) and Youngstown (1946), director and editor of Pioneer Publishing and Pathfinder Press (1947-81), manager of Mountain Spring Camp (1948-62) and editor and writer for the Militant and other party publications, including the first English-language anthology of Che Guevara’s writings, Che Guevara Speaks and The War Correspondence of Leon Trotsky: The Balkan Wars, 1912-1913 (He had become United States literary representative of the Trotsky estate after Natalia Sedova Trotsky’s death in 1962). After his expulsion from the SWP in the great purge of 1983-1984, Weissman joined with others to form the Fourth Internationalist Tendency and became a member of the Bulletin in Defense of Marxism editorial board. He died on March 28, 1985. The George Lavan Weissman Collection consists of correspondence (both his and Connie Weissman’s), the manuscript for volume two of Trotsky’s war correspondence, on which Weissman was working at the time of his death, and numerous pamphlets and other publications put out by the SWP and a variety of civil rights and civil libertarian organizations to which he belonged.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Grant (1913-2006)
    Ted Grant (1913-2006). Avec la mort d'Isaac Blank, connu dans le mouvement ouvrier international sous le nom de Ted Grant, c'est l'une des dernières grandes figures du combat révolutionnaire ayant traversé le XX° siècle qui s'en va. C'est aussi le "père" de l'un des "vieux" courants historiques du trotskysme qui disparaît (parmi les derniers survivants dont on peut en dire autant, restent Guillermo Lora et Pierre Lambert). Le chauvinisme conscient ou inconscient qui sévit en France fait que pour beaucoup, ce nom ne dit rien, et qu'apprendre qu'il s'agit du fondateur d'un courant trotskyste risque de ne pas être très encourageant. Il est vrai qu'avant même d'être un militant ouvrier révolutionnaire, ce qu'il fut de sa quinzième année (1928) à sa mort, Ted Grant avait l'avantage d'être issu d'une famille cosmopolite, un père juif russe et une mère française, installée en Afrique du Sud, ce qui l'aura sans doute aidé à penser à l'échelle de la planète. Afrique du Sud. Isaac Blank fut gagné au marxisme par un militant du Parti communiste sud-africain que logeait sa mère, Ralph Lee, en 1928. L'année suivante c'est ensemble qu'ils lisaient le journal des trotskystes américains, The Militant, et se ralliaient aux idées qu'il contenait, fondant un petit groupe trotskyste à Johannesburg, qui devait gagner des militants et construire des syndicats dans les milieux noirs et indiens de la blanchisserie et du nettoyage, d'où des liens ultérieurs de Ted Grant avec des militants indiens et ceylanais.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Hansen Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf78700585 No online items Register of the Joseph Hansen papers Finding aid prepared by Joseph Hansen Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6003 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1998, 2006, 2012 Register of the Joseph Hansen 92035 1 papers Title: Joseph Hansen papers Date (inclusive): 1887-1980 Collection Number: 92035 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 109 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 3 envelopes, 1 audio cassette(46.2 linear feet) Abstract: Speeches and writings, correspondence, notes, minutes, reports, internal bulletins, resolutions, theses, printed matter, sound recording, and photographs relating to Leon Trotsky, activities of the Socialist Workers Party in the United States, and activities of the Fourth International in Latin America, Western Europe and elsewhere. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Hansen, Joseph, Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Joseph Hansen papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1992. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu . Materials have been added to the collection if the number of boxes listed in the online catalog is larger than the number of boxes listed in this finding aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Bibliographical Sketch of Max Shachtman
    The Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet Max Shachtman Bio-Bibliographical Sketch Contents: • Basic biographical data • Biographical sketch • Selective bibliography • Notes on archives Basic biographical data Name: Max Shachtman Other names (by-names, pseud. etc.): Cousin John * Marty Dworkin * M.S. * Max Marsh * Max * Michaels * Pedro * S. * Max Schachtman * Sh * Maks Shakhtman * S-n * Tr * Trent * M.N. Trent Date and place of birth: September 10, 1904, Warsaw (Russia [Poland]) Date and place of death: November 4, 1972, Floral Park, NY (USA) Nationality: Russian, American Occupations, careers, etc.: Editor, writer, party leader Time of activity in Trotskyist movement: 1928 - ca. 1948 Biographical sketch Max Shachtman was a renowned writer, editor, polemicist and agitator who, together with James P. Cannon and Martin Abern, in 1928/29 founded the Trotskyist movement in the United States and for some 12 years func­ tioned as one of its main leaders and chief theoreticians. He was a close collaborator of Leon Trotsky and translated some of his major works. Nicknamed Trotsky's commissar for foreign affairs, he held key positions in the leading bodies of Trotsky's international movement before, in 1940, he split from the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), founded the Workers Party (WP) and in 1948 definitively dissociated from the Fourth International. Shachtman's name was closely webbed with the theory of bureaucratic collectivism and with what was described as Third Campism ('Neither Washington nor Moscow'). His thought had some lasting influence on a consider­ able number of contemporaneous intellectuals, writers, and socialist youth, both American and abroad. Once a key figure in the history and struggles of the American and international Trotskyist movement, Shachtman, from the late 1940s to his death in 1972, made a remarkable journey from the left margin of American society to the right, thus having been an inspirer of both Anti-Stalinist Marxists and of neo-conservative hard-liners.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spartacist Pamphlet a $1.50 Cdn $1 £ 0.75 US $1 Trotskyism: What It Isn't and What It Lsi
    A Spartacist Pamphlet A $1.50 Cdn $1 £ 0.75 US $1 Trotskyism: What It Isn't and What It lsi L.Y. Leonidov V.1. Lenin and Leon Trotsky, leaders of the Russian Revolution, on its second anniversary in Moscow's Red Square. February 1990 ,"¢~:j~;:~X523 Spartacist Publishing Co., Box 1377 GPO, New York, NY 10116 2 Trotskyism: What It Isn't and What It Is! This article was first published in Spartacist (German We stand with those members and ex-members of the SED edition) No. 14, Winter 1989-90. There are two additions to who defend the gains the working people achieved through the English text, one dealing with the "Trotskyist" revisionists the overthrow of capitalism. We stand for the communism as the political heirs of the London Bureau and the other of Lenin and Trotsky'S Bolshevik Party. with the role played by former American Healyite leader The '''refonners'' in the bureaucracy are promising "so­ Tim Wohlforth against the struggle for authentic Trotskyism cialist renewal." But Stalinism can't deliver any kind of in the U.S. Other minor changes and corrections have also "renewal." As an ideology Stalinism is simply an apology been made. for the rule of the bureaucracy. Its slogans and "debates" are but arguments about how to put the best false face on To the workers of Germany, the policies of betrayal. Without state power, Stalinist ide­ ology is an empty shell, devoid of any relevance to the East and West, and to question of proletarian power. European and other militants The bureaucracy headed by J.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of a Revolutionary Perspective
    AtarxiJt J3ulletin ~o. I In Defense of a Revolutionary Perspective -A Statement of nasic Position by the Hevolutionary Tendency. Presented to the June 1962 plenary meeting of the SWP National Committee. Published by SPARTACIST Box 1377, G.P.D. New York, N. Y. 10001 25 centJ PREFACE The material bearing on the history and struggles of the Revolutionary Tendency inside the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) occupies a special place in the Marxist Bulletin series. Without a serious and critical attitude toward its own development, no political formation can go beyond the first stages in meeting the central challenge facing Marxist-Leninists in the United ~~ates--the building of a revolutionary party. -Marxist Bulletins Nos. 1,2,3, and 4 are all devoted to the period from the consolidation of the Revolutionary Tendency (RT) within the Swp to the expulsion of the RT leadership from the SWP, which covered the two-year span, 1962-1963. Orig~n of ~ Revolutionary Tendency The nucleus of the RT originated in the central leadership of the Young Socialist Alliance, and first came together as a left opposition to the SWP Majority's uncritical line toward the course of the Cuban Revolution~ This preliminary dispute culmin­ ated in the adoption of a thoroughly revisionist position by the SWP I1ajority at the June 1961 party convention. The party's theoretical revisionism, together with its abstentionist and opportunist practice, were car~ied into the party's general inter­ national line and began to turn the party away from a revolution­ ary perspective in the United States as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya, Anti-Imperialism, and the Socialist Party
    Published on Workers' Liberty (http://www.workersliberty.org) Libya, anti-imperialism, and the Socialist Party By Sean Matgamna This is a copy-edited and slightly expanded version of the text printed in WL 3/34 Libya, anti-imperialism, and the Socialist Party Did Taaffe equate the Libyan rebels with the Nicaraguan contras? [3] Anything other than "absolute opposition" means support? [4] Intellectual hooliganism and AWL's "evasions" [5] What is more important in the situation than stopping massacre? [6] Bishop Taaffe and imperialism [7] What is the "anti-imperialist" programme in today's world? [8] From semi-colony to regional power [9] Taaffe's record as an anti-imperialist [10] The separation of AWL and the Socialist Party [11] Militant in the mid 1960s [12] How did we come to break with Militant? Anti-union laws [13] What is a Marxist perspective? [14] Peaceful revolution [15] Our general critique of Militant's politics [16] "We can't discuss what Grant and Taaffe can't reply to" [17] The US in Iraq and union freedoms [18] Socialists and the European Union [19] Toadying to Bob Crow [20] Ireland: why socialists must have a democratic programme [21] Conclusion: Pretension [22] Appendix: Militant and the Labour Party, 1969-87 - a strange symbiosis [23] What We Are And What We Must Become: critique of Militant, written in 1966, which became the founding document of the AWL tendency, is available at http://www.workersliberty.org/wwaawwmb The RSL (Militant) in the 1960s: a study of passivity: an account of how What We Are And What We Must Become came to be written, and the battle around its ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for the Labour Party but from The
    Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Nicolas Sigoillot To cite this version: Nicolas Sigoillot. Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Ob- jectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2020, XXV (3), 10.4000/rfcb.5873. hal-03250124 HAL Id: hal-03250124 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03250124 Submitted on 4 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents:
    [Show full text]