DOCSLIB.ORG

Hate Trotskyism, Hate the Spartacist League

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Hate Trotskyism, Hate the Spartacist League -a bulletin series consisting of material hostile to Trotskyism and the Spartacist League BULLETIN NO.3 -Reprint of "What Is Spartacist?" by Tim Wohlforth, Second Edition (June 1973) -Reprint of "The Wohlforth League: Counterfeit Trotskyists" from Spartacist No. 17-18, August-September 1970 -Reprint of "The Workers League and the Interna­ tional Committee: A Statement by Tim Wohlforth" 11 January 1975 -Reprint of "Confessions of a 'Renegade': Wohlforth Terminated" from Workers Vanguard No. 61,31 January 1975 Spartacist Publishing Company August 1975 Box 1377 GPO whole no.3 New York, New York 10116 $2.75 Preface In this third bulletin of the "Hate Trotskyism, Hate the Spartacist League" series we have reproduced the second edition of Wohlforth's "What Is Spartacist?" along with his .. introduction. Although Wohlforth stated (in the introduc- tion) that "nothing has been changed," in comparing the first edition with the second we found no less than 194 editorial alterations in the body of the document and more in the footnotes. These are all minor editorial changes and not major political changes, but are certainly more than "nothing." This deliberate and written lie is typical of Wohlforth's lack of concern for truth, a trait evident also in the many inaccuracies/lies in the text of the • pamphlet itself. A 2Partacist reply to this pamphlet, • published while the material was being printed in its original form in the Workers League's Bulletin, is also included. We have also reprinted his statement "The Workers League and the International Committee" in its original form just as we received it, and our commentary on the latter ("Wohlforth Terminated") from Workers Van~ard. ... 1 lntroduction P~e3 "If we subtract everything accidental, personal and episodical, If we reduce the present groupings In struggle to their fundamental political types, then In­ dubitably the struggle of comrade Abern against com­ rade Cannon has been the most consistent. In this struggle· Abern represents a propagandistic group, petty-bourgeois In Its social composition, united by old personal ties and having almost the character of a family." Leon Trotsky, In Defense of Marxism, page 61 Introduction This series originally appeared In the weekly Bulletin from June 22, 1971 to August 10, 1970. Over the past 25 years the world Trotskyist movement has been passing through a difficult period oC internal struggle. During the inflationary postwar boom-the product of the capitalists fear of confrontation with the workinst class and in no sense a solution to the crisis of capitalism -powerful Seand Edit.... June 1m revisionist and liquidationist tendencies developed within the Fourth International. Michel Pablo, the postwar International Published by: ubot Publications, Incorporated, Seventh Sec;r~tary of the Fourth International, was the leading figure Floor, 135 West 1.th Street, New York, New 10011. for many years in. these revisionist efforts to liquidate the movement. The position of Pablo and Pabloism was to abandon the Transitional Program upon which the Fourth International was founded in 1938. He held that the Tn_iUonal Program was not applicable because of the "new reality" of the postwar . period. This theory of a "new reality" was based on im­ pressions of the permanence of the postwar capitalist boom, the apparent strength of Stalinism, the continuing struggles in the colonial countries which were led by petty bourgeois nationalist forces, and the very slow and largely politically reformist life of the mass of workers in the metropolitan coun­ tries. All this was seen as permanent and the underlying crisis of capitalism was totally ignored. On this basis, the construc­ tion of Trotskyist parties was abandoned In Cavor of putting pressure on existing Stali"ist. reformist and nationalist Page 4 What 11 Spartacilt? Introduction Page 5 leaderships. method of the SWP itself. Through such a break, the develop­ Thus, Pabloism abandoned the Marxist method for im­ ment of an alternati\'e Marxist perspective could be put pressionism and empiricism. It turned its back on the working forward. class and represented a petty bourgeois tendency sensitive to Robertson was among the first to carry through a formal the pressures of the capitalist class itself. break with the revisionism of the SWP only to embrace it in The 25 year struggle against Pabloism, which is by no another form. He has been followed by many others: Lynn means over, has been the central theoretical preparation of Marcus and his Labor Committee, Art Fox and his United the world Trotskyist movement for the new period of inter­ National Caucus, Harry 'Turner and his Vanguard national capitalist crisis and class struggle we are now in so Newsletter, and now Passan and Gregorich and their Class deeply. As' the International' Committee has analyzed all Struggle League. Robertson was the granddaddy of them all. along, the very factors which made for the boom and the' slew On all the fundamental questions, they agree with Robertson. movement of the working class in the past period, that is, the In turn. Robertson still agrees fundamentally with the SWP. inflationary monetary arrangements worked out at Bretton The main tenets of Robertson's position go back to his Woods in 1944,' today have a revolutionary impact on original break with the International Committee in 1962 . capitalist relations; ripping apart the compromises between . Robertson ..did not begin from the continuity of world classes and requiring preparation for the fundamental Trotskyism which has taken the form of the bitter struggle of struggle for power itself. Now we can actually construct mass' the International Committee against revisionism: He revolutionary parties in a number of countries. recognized neither the theoretical importance of that struggle, This new situation makes our study of the past develop­ nor the importance. of the international movement con­ ment of the Trotskyist movement .all the more urgent. The structed through that struggle, nor above all the actual con­ struggle against revisionism led to the formation of the Inter­ tent of what was learned through that struggle. For this national Committee of the Fourth International in 1953. The reason, Robertson has no perspective for the present period. Ie has carried this struggle forward ever since, thereby main­ Lacking a perspective, Robertson exists for the purpose of ex­ taining the continuity of Trotskyism~ of Bolshevism, into this isting. He maintains a circle of people who function as middle new period when mass parties can be built. For this very class radicals. reason, the struggle against revisionism is our theoretical capital. It is our development of Marxism from Trotsky's day, INTERNATIONALISM so essential in equipping and training our movement for The publication of Leon Trotsky's The Spanish Revolution revolutionary tasks today. (1931-:19) is of the greatest importance not only for the light it Theoretical development over the whole past period has sheds on the Spanish events and revolutionary strategy in general hut paiticularlY for the discussion of differences with been painfully slow, reflecting the isolation of the Trotskyist Andres ~in and tQe Spanish Section of the International Left movement from revolutionary struggle because of the boom. Opposition. The dispute with Nin was over the same issue. Nevertheless, theoretical development has taken place. In Trotsky, over a long period, battled Andres Nin's refusal to fact, the very slowness of this development has made the really concern himself with the day to day life of the inter­ lessons learned over this' period that much more important national movement, to seek to learn from this life, and in turn and substantial. .The issues in dispute with revisionism were to develop a policy in Spain which was rooted in international and are the central issues: the nature of the period, perspec­ tives, the party itself, Marxism. perspectives. He accused Nin of carrying out a passive; propagandistic existence which he covered with arguments The struggle' with James Robertson and' his' Spartacist about the exceptional character of events in Spain. In the end, League is a significant chapter in the history of this 25 year Nin fused with the centrist Maurin and constructed the --struggle agafnst revisionism. Robertson was originally a sup­ ?OUM whose first act was to embrace the Popular Front in . porter of the International Committee. He was among diose :;pain. The degenerate, centrist role of the POUM made a . who originally opposed the Socialist Workers Party's em- ::ritical contribution to the defeat of the Spanish Revolution . bracing of Pabloite revisionism in 1961. However, he broke Trot!:ky writes: with the International Committee at the pre<;ise point where "1{ the Spanish Oppositionilts remained unac­ opposition to the SWP's revisionism required a break with the quainted with thilltruggle (the internal struggle o{ Page 6 What Is Spartacist? Introduction Page 7 the International Left Opposition-To W.) then from the IC. Ever since, his role has been one of seeking u~­ that must be considered a great shortcoming. We principled alliances internationally which are aimed against cannot develop true revolutionists without giving the IC. , the young communists the chance to follow the It is significant to note the position he took at the 1966 day-to-dayelaboration of the Bolshevik policies not Conference. He stated to that Conference that there no longer only in the Spanish section but in the other sec­ tions ,of the International Opposition as well. Only existed a Fourth International. All that existed were several in this manner can we gain expe ..ience, build and factions calling themselves "Fourth International" each of strengthen the revolutionary consciousness. This which contained some worthy elements. His hope was to bring is precisely the most important part of the about some sort of regroupment of these forces on the basis of democratic party regime that we strive to es· Spartacist.
Recommended publications
  • THE ANARCHIST COLLECTIVES Edited by Sa M Dolgoff

    THE ANARCHIST COLLECTIVES Edited by Sa M Dolgoff

    THE ANARCHIST COLLECTIVES Edited by Sa m Dolgoff W o rk e rs ’ Self-management in t h e Sp a n ish Revolution 1936-1939 Introductory Essay by Murray ßookchin THE ANARCHIST COLLECTIVES: Workers’ Self-management in the Spanish Revolution (1936-1939) Copyright © 1974 by Sam Dolgoff Introductory Essay © 1974 by Murray Bookchin All rights reserved, Free Life Editions, Inc. First Edition Published 1974 by Free Life Editions, Inc. 41 Union Square West New York, N.Y. 10003 Canadian edition published by Black Rose Books by arrangement with Free Life Editions, Inc. Black Rose Books 3934 St. Urbain Montreal 1 31, Quebec Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 73-88239 ISBN: 0-914156-02-0 paperback ISBN: 0-914156-03-9 hardcover Manufactured in the United States of America Faculty Press, Inc. Brooklyn, N.Y. To the heroic workers and peasants o f Spain! To my comrades, the Spanish Anarchists, who perished fighting for freedom! To the militants who continue the struggle! Contents PREFACE by Sam Dolgoff—ix INTRODUCTORY ESSAY by Murray Bookchin-x/ PART ONE: BACKGROUND 1. THE SPA NISH RE VOL UTION 5 The Two Revolutions (S.D.)—5 The Trend Towards Workers’ Self-Management (S.D.)—14 2. THE LIBERTARIAN TRADITION 19 The Rural Collectivist Tradition (S.D.)—20 The Anarchist Influence (S.D.)— 23 The Political and Economic Organization of Society (Isaac Puente)— 28 3. HISTORICAL NOTES 35 The Prologue to Revolution (S.D.)—35 The Counter-Revolution and the Destruction of the Collectives (S.D.)—40 4. THE LIMITATIONS OF THE REVOLUTION (Gaston Leval) 49 PART TWO: THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION 5.
  • Goerge Lavan Weissman Papers

    Goerge Lavan Weissman Papers

    George Lavan Weissman Collection Papers, 1935-1985 3 linear feet 3 storage boxes Accession #1347 DALNET # OCLC # George Lavan Weissman was born in Chicago in 1916 and grew up in Boston, where he attended Boston Latin School and Harvard College. While at Harvard during the Great Depression, he became a Marxist, joined the Young People’s Socialist League and the Socialist Party and volunteered as an organizer for several labor unions in New England. Weissman followed the Trotskyists out of the SP after their expulsion in 1937 and helped found the Socialist Workers Party and the Fourth International in 1938. He married fellow SWP activist, Constance Fox Harding, in 1943. As a self-described “party functionary,” Weissman was a branch organizer in Boston (1939-41) and Youngstown (1946), director and editor of Pioneer Publishing and Pathfinder Press (1947-81), manager of Mountain Spring Camp (1948-62) and editor and writer for the Militant and other party publications, including the first English-language anthology of Che Guevara’s writings, Che Guevara Speaks and The War Correspondence of Leon Trotsky: The Balkan Wars, 1912-1913 (He had become United States literary representative of the Trotsky estate after Natalia Sedova Trotsky’s death in 1962). After his expulsion from the SWP in the great purge of 1983-1984, Weissman joined with others to form the Fourth Internationalist Tendency and became a member of the Bulletin in Defense of Marxism editorial board. He died on March 28, 1985. The George Lavan Weissman Collection consists of correspondence (both his and Connie Weissman’s), the manuscript for volume two of Trotsky’s war correspondence, on which Weissman was working at the time of his death, and numerous pamphlets and other publications put out by the SWP and a variety of civil rights and civil libertarian organizations to which he belonged.
  • Joseph Hansen Papers

    Joseph Hansen Papers

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf78700585 No online items Register of the Joseph Hansen papers Finding aid prepared by Joseph Hansen Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6003 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1998, 2006, 2012 Register of the Joseph Hansen 92035 1 papers Title: Joseph Hansen papers Date (inclusive): 1887-1980 Collection Number: 92035 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 109 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 3 envelopes, 1 audio cassette(46.2 linear feet) Abstract: Speeches and writings, correspondence, notes, minutes, reports, internal bulletins, resolutions, theses, printed matter, sound recording, and photographs relating to Leon Trotsky, activities of the Socialist Workers Party in the United States, and activities of the Fourth International in Latin America, Western Europe and elsewhere. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Hansen, Joseph, Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Joseph Hansen papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1992. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu . Materials have been added to the collection if the number of boxes listed in the online catalog is larger than the number of boxes listed in this finding aid.
  • Bio-Bibliographical Sketch of Max Shachtman

    Bio-Bibliographical Sketch of Max Shachtman

    The Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet Max Shachtman Bio-Bibliographical Sketch Contents: • Basic biographical data • Biographical sketch • Selective bibliography • Notes on archives Basic biographical data Name: Max Shachtman Other names (by-names, pseud. etc.): Cousin John * Marty Dworkin * M.S. * Max Marsh * Max * Michaels * Pedro * S. * Max Schachtman * Sh * Maks Shakhtman * S-n * Tr * Trent * M.N. Trent Date and place of birth: September 10, 1904, Warsaw (Russia [Poland]) Date and place of death: November 4, 1972, Floral Park, NY (USA) Nationality: Russian, American Occupations, careers, etc.: Editor, writer, party leader Time of activity in Trotskyist movement: 1928 - ca. 1948 Biographical sketch Max Shachtman was a renowned writer, editor, polemicist and agitator who, together with James P. Cannon and Martin Abern, in 1928/29 founded the Trotskyist movement in the United States and for some 12 years func­ tioned as one of its main leaders and chief theoreticians. He was a close collaborator of Leon Trotsky and translated some of his major works. Nicknamed Trotsky's commissar for foreign affairs, he held key positions in the leading bodies of Trotsky's international movement before, in 1940, he split from the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), founded the Workers Party (WP) and in 1948 definitively dissociated from the Fourth International. Shachtman's name was closely webbed with the theory of bureaucratic collectivism and with what was described as Third Campism ('Neither Washington nor Moscow'). His thought had some lasting influence on a consider­ able number of contemporaneous intellectuals, writers, and socialist youth, both American and abroad. Once a key figure in the history and struggles of the American and international Trotskyist movement, Shachtman, from the late 1940s to his death in 1972, made a remarkable journey from the left margin of American society to the right, thus having been an inspirer of both Anti-Stalinist Marxists and of neo-conservative hard-liners.
  • O Eview Bssay

    O Eview Bssay

    c:\users\ken\documents\type3402\rj 3402 050 red.docx 2015-02-04 9:19 PM o eview bssay BEHIND THE SCENES AT THE BRPF, THE VIETNAM SOLIDARITY CAMPAIGN, AND THE RUSSELL TRIBUNAL Stefan Andersson [email protected] Ernest Tate. Revolutionary Activism in the 1950s and 60s: a Memoir. Vol. 1: Can- ada 1955–1965. Pp. xvi, 274. C$15; £9; €11. Vol. 2: Britain 1965–1969. London: Resistance Books, 2014. Pp. xviii, 402. isbn: 978-0-902869-60-8. C$21; £13. i. introduction rnest (Ernie) Tate was born in 1934 in Northern Ireland and emigrated to b=Canada in 1955. He describes himself as “a working class activist without any formal education, politically formed mainly by my experiences in a small Trotskyist group in Canada” (Memoir 2: 164). He came to Britain in 1965 to establish, with much help from his partner, Jess MacKenzie, a British Section of the Fourth International. This is when the International Marxist Group (img) was born. In this review I will limit my comments to Tate’s activities in his second volume relating to the brpf, the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign (vsc) and the International War Crimes Tribunal (iwct). Tate describes how the img came into being and some of its main person- alities: Ken Coates, Pat Jordan, Geoff Coggan, and in particular Tariq Ali. Ali was elected President of the Oxford Union in 1965 and organized the first teach-in against the Vietnam war in the uk. He was a delegate on behalf of the British Peace Committee to the Communist-dominated Helsinki Peace Conference, visited Vietnam as a member of one of the investigative commis- sions sent out by the iwct and reported his findings at the session in Stock- holm in May 1967.
  • A Spartacist Pamphlet a $1.50 Cdn $1 £ 0.75 US $1 Trotskyism: What It Isn't and What It Lsi

    A Spartacist Pamphlet a $1.50 Cdn $1 £ 0.75 US $1 Trotskyism: What It Isn't and What It Lsi

    A Spartacist Pamphlet A $1.50 Cdn $1 £ 0.75 US $1 Trotskyism: What It Isn't and What It lsi L.Y. Leonidov V.1. Lenin and Leon Trotsky, leaders of the Russian Revolution, on its second anniversary in Moscow's Red Square. February 1990 ,"¢~:j~;:~X523 Spartacist Publishing Co., Box 1377 GPO, New York, NY 10116 2 Trotskyism: What It Isn't and What It Is! This article was first published in Spartacist (German We stand with those members and ex-members of the SED edition) No. 14, Winter 1989-90. There are two additions to who defend the gains the working people achieved through the English text, one dealing with the "Trotskyist" revisionists the overthrow of capitalism. We stand for the communism as the political heirs of the London Bureau and the other of Lenin and Trotsky'S Bolshevik Party. with the role played by former American Healyite leader The '''refonners'' in the bureaucracy are promising "so­ Tim Wohlforth against the struggle for authentic Trotskyism cialist renewal." But Stalinism can't deliver any kind of in the U.S. Other minor changes and corrections have also "renewal." As an ideology Stalinism is simply an apology been made. for the rule of the bureaucracy. Its slogans and "debates" are but arguments about how to put the best false face on To the workers of Germany, the policies of betrayal. Without state power, Stalinist ide­ ology is an empty shell, devoid of any relevance to the East and West, and to question of proletarian power. European and other militants The bureaucracy headed by J.
  • In Defense of a Revolutionary Perspective

    In Defense of a Revolutionary Perspective

    AtarxiJt J3ulletin ~o. I In Defense of a Revolutionary Perspective -A Statement of nasic Position by the Hevolutionary Tendency. Presented to the June 1962 plenary meeting of the SWP National Committee. Published by SPARTACIST Box 1377, G.P.D. New York, N. Y. 10001 25 centJ PREFACE The material bearing on the history and struggles of the Revolutionary Tendency inside the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) occupies a special place in the Marxist Bulletin series. Without a serious and critical attitude toward its own development, no political formation can go beyond the first stages in meeting the central challenge facing Marxist-Leninists in the United ~~ates--the building of a revolutionary party. -Marxist Bulletins Nos. 1,2,3, and 4 are all devoted to the period from the consolidation of the Revolutionary Tendency (RT) within the Swp to the expulsion of the RT leadership from the SWP, which covered the two-year span, 1962-1963. Orig~n of ~ Revolutionary Tendency The nucleus of the RT originated in the central leadership of the Young Socialist Alliance, and first came together as a left opposition to the SWP Majority's uncritical line toward the course of the Cuban Revolution~ This preliminary dispute culmin­ ated in the adoption of a thoroughly revisionist position by the SWP I1ajority at the June 1961 party convention. The party's theoretical revisionism, together with its abstentionist and opportunist practice, were car~ied into the party's general inter­ national line and began to turn the party away from a revolution­ ary perspective in the United States as well.
  • To Download As

    To Download As

    Solidarity& Workers’ Liberty For social ownership of the banks and industry Reminiscences of Ted Knight, 1933-2020 By Sean Matgamna am saddened by the death of Ted Knight (30 March 2020). I knew him well long ago in the Orthodox Trotskyist organisa- Ition of the late 1950s and early 1960s. When I first encountered him, Ted was a full-time organiser for the Socialist Labour League (SLL), responsible for the Man- chester and Glasgow branches, alternating a week here and a week there. He was on a nominal wage of £8 a week and was lucky if he got £4. He recruited me, then an adolescent member of the Young Communist League, to the SLL. I’d come to think of myself as a Trotskyist, but was unconvinced - didn’t want to be convinced, I suppose - that a revolution was needed to overthrow the Rus- sian bureaucracy. Ted Knight (in middle background) with Bertrand Russell (right Ted lent me his copy of Trotsky’s The Revolution Betrayed. I foreground) and Russell’s secretary Ralph Schoenman (bearded, didn’t take a lot of persuading, as I recall it. left). From The Newsletter, 25 June 1966 That Ted Knight would have been very surprised to find his obituary in the Morning Star headlined “A giant of the labour of the Orthodox Trotskyist Labour Review when it became a big movement” (as if the Morning Star would know about such A4-sized magazine designed for (successful) intervention into things!). the crisis-ridden Communist Party from January 1957. But in The Manchester SLL branch I joined early in 1960 was going 1959-60 there was still a great deal of the old hostility to Trot- through a bad period.
  • A Memoir of Life in Struggle

    A Memoir of Life in Struggle

    A Memoir of Life in Struggle https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article4340 Reviews A Memoir of Life in Struggle - Reviews section - Publication date: Saturday 26 December 2015 Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - All rights reserved Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine Page 1/5 A Memoir of Life in Struggle European Trotskyists, in recent writings about the movement, tend to give short shrift to Trotskyism in North America. (An example is An Impatient Life by the late French leader Daniel Bensaid.) While the U.S. Socialist Workers Party has been covered in books published by the SWP before its degeneration, and more recently in my own political memoir about my time in the SWP from 1960 through 1988, the Canadian movement has not received the attention it deserves. This book by Ernie Tate sheds light on an important decade of Canadian Trotskyism. It begins with Ernie being born into the Protestant working class in the British-controlled six counties of Northern Ireland. He had little formal education: âEurosoeI had left school before my fourteenth birthday, the legal age at that time for school leaving in Northern Ireland. Most of the young people in the area I grew up âEuros" Protestant working class Shankill Road âEuros" terminated their formal education at that age, or earlier if they could. In the whole time I lived in Belfast, I had never known or met anyone who had gone to a secondary school, never mind university. My family was the poorest of the poor. There was a common joke around my neighborhood that had a lot of truth to it: 'If anyone around here paid their rent two weeks in a row, the police would be visiting to see where the money came from.'âEuros (6) He recounts how the Catholic working class was even worse off and suffered extreme oppression at the hands of the Protestants.
  • North Korea and the Theory of the Deformed Workers' State

    North Korea and the Theory of the Deformed Workers' State

    North Korea and the Theory of the Deformed Workers’ State: Definitions and First Principles of a Fourth International Theory Alzo David-West James P. Cannon, Peng Shuzi, Pierre Frank, Michel Pablo, Ernest Mandel, and Tim Wohlforth Abstract This essay examines the academically neglected theory of the deformed workers’ state in relation to the political character of the North Korean state. Developed by leaders of the Fourth International, the world party of socialism founded by exiled Russian Bolshevik revolutionary Leon Trotsky, the theory classifies the national states that arose under post- Second World War Soviet Army occupation as bureaucratic, hybrid, transitional formations that imitated the Soviet Stalinist system. The author reviews the origin of the theory, explores its political propositions and apparent correspondences in the North Korean case, and concludes with some hypotheses and suggestions for further research. Copyright © 2012 by Alzo David-West and Cultural Logic, ISSN 1097-3087 Alzo David-West 2 Introduction On the centenary of the birth of Kim Il Sung in 2012, North Korea entered a period officially designated as “opening the gate to a great prosperous and powerful socialist nation.” Coming after the post-Soviet rise of markets within a planned economy, the initiation of capitalist Special Economic Zones in the early 1990s and 2000s, market- oriented economic and currency reforms in 2002, and the dropping of “communism” from the 2009 revised constitution, the reference to present-day North Korea as a “socialist nation” is evidently more symbolic than substantial. Still, over sixty years after the founding of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) on 9 September 1948, the political character of the North Korean state remains a more or less unresolved issue in North Korean studies.
  • The British Far Left from 1956

    The British Far Left from 1956

    The British far left from 1956 EDITED BY EVAN SMITH AND MATTHEW WORLEY Against the grain MANCHESTER 1824 Manchester University Press This content downloaded from 154.59.124.115 on Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:26:06 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms This content downloaded from 154.59.124.115 on Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:26:06 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Against the grain The British far left from 1956 Edited by Evan Smith and Matthew Worley Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed in the United States exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan This content downloaded from 154.59.124.115 on Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:26:06 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Copyright © Manchester University Press 2014 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors, and no chapter may be reproduced wholly or in part without the express permission in writing of both author and publisher. Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk Distributed in the United States exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA Distributed in Canada exclusively by UBC Press, University of British Columbia, 2029 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 978 07190 9590 0 hardback First published 2014 The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for any external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
  • Socialist Workers Party Records

    Socialist Workers Party Records

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf1k40019v No online items Register of the Socialist Workers Party records Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution Archives Staff Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6010 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1998, 2016 Register of the Socialist Workers 92036 1 Party records Title: Socialist Workers Party records Date (inclusive): 1928-1998 Collection Number: 92036 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 135 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box(57.8 linear feet) Abstract: Correspondence, minutes, resolutions, theses, and internal bulletins, relating to Trotskyist and other socialist activities in Latin America, Western Europe, Iran, and elsewhere, and to interactions of the Socialist Workers Party with the Fourth International; and trial transcripts, briefs, other legal documents, and background materials, relating to the lawsuit brought by Alan Gelfand against the Socialist Workers Party in 1979. Most of collection also available on microfilm (108 reels). Creator: Socialist Workers Party. Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all audiovisual material is immediately accessible. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Socialist Workers Party Records, [Box no.], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information The Hoover Institution Archives acquired records of the Socialist Workers Party from the Anchor Foundation in 1992.