DOCSLIB.ORG

Norwegian Housing and Return Projects in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Norwegian Housing and Return Projects in Bosnia and Herzegovina NORWEGIAN HOUSING AND RETURN PROJECTS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Report by Karin Lisa Kirkengen NORDEM Report 18/2006 Copyright: the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights/NORDEM and Karin Lisa Kirkengen. NORDEM, the Norwegian Resource Bank for Democracy and Human Rights, is a programme of the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights (NCHR), and has as its main objective to actively promote international human rights. NORDEM is jointly administered by NCHR and the Norwegian Refugee Council. NORDEM works mainly in relation to multilateral institutions. The operative mandate of the programme is realised primarily through the recruitment and deployment of qualified Norwegian personnel to international assignments that promote democratisation and respect for human rights. The programme is responsible for the training of personnel before deployment and reporting on completed assignments, and plays a role in research related to areas of active involvement. The vast majority of assignments are channelled through the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. NORDEM Report is a series of reports documenting NORDEM activities and is published jointly by NORDEM and the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights. Series editor: Hege Mørk Series consultants: Turid Wulff Knutsen, Christian Boe Astrup The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher. ISSN: 1503–1330 ISBN 10: 82-8158-032-1 ISBN 13: 978-82-8158-032-9 NORDEM Report is available online at: http://www.humanrights.uio.no/forskning/publ/publikasjonsliste.html Preface The report was commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the beginning of 2005 and it was researched and written between February 2005 and February 2006. The author of the report, Karin Lisa Kirkengen, worked in Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNCHR) and the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM) between October 2000 and November 2004, mainly in the fields of refugee return, property law implementation and political monitoring. The main findings of the report were presented to the staff of the Norwegian Embassy in Sarajevo on 20 September 2006 and in an open session at the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights on 9 November 2006. The Norwegian Centre for Human Rights / NORDEM University of Oslo December 2006 Contents Preface Contents Table of figures................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 7 Scope and purpose of the study .......................................................................................... 7 Brief overview of return and reconstruction in BiH ........................................................... 7 History of return.............................................................................................................. 7 Aims and strategies for the international community’s involvement in return .............. 8 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 11 Archive study.................................................................................................................... 11 Sources of information.................................................................................................. 11 Categorisation of projects ............................................................................................. 12 IDP/refugee accommodation .................................................................................... 13 Majority housing....................................................................................................... 13 Minority housing....................................................................................................... 13 Field study......................................................................................................................... 14 Sample selection ........................................................................................................... 14 Data collection and analysis.......................................................................................... 14 Terms and definitions ................................................................................................... 15 Ethnicity.................................................................................................................... 15 Minority/majority...................................................................................................... 15 Urban/rural................................................................................................................ 16 Archive study................................................................................................................... 17 Overview of all Norwegian funded and/or implemented projects.................................... 17 Overview of Norwegian funded projects.......................................................................... 21 Number of projects and houses, implementing agencies and donors ........................... 21 Locations.......................................................................................................................22 Project types.................................................................................................................. 22 Funding .........................................................................................................................23 Developments over time ............................................................................................... 25 Occupancy and return rate ............................................................................................ 29 Reconstruction model ................................................................................................... 30 Beneficiary selection..................................................................................................... 32 Criteria for beneficiary selection .................................................................................. 33 Other project output ...................................................................................................... 35 Co-operation and co-ordination .................................................................................... 35 Project objectives and rationale .................................................................................... 36 Field Study....................................................................................................................... 38 Background of returnees and return locations .................................................................. 38 Return location profile .................................................................................................. 38 Sarajevo Stari Grad................................................................................................... 38 Mostar ....................................................................................................................... 39 Bosanski Petrovac..................................................................................................... 39 Kljuc.......................................................................................................................... 40 Brcko District............................................................................................................ 41 Brod........................................................................................................................... 42 Derventa.................................................................................................................... 42 Modrica..................................................................................................................... 43 Interviewee profile........................................................................................................ 44 Interviewees’ displacement history............................................................................... 44 Interviewees’ return history .......................................................................................... 45 Reconstruction assistance ......................................................................................... 46 Other return related assistance.................................................................................. 51 Sustainability of return...................................................................................................... 52 Current return/occupancy rate....................................................................................... 53 Future stability/growth of return population................................................................. 54 Likelihood of further return ...................................................................................... 54 Wish for re-migration ............................................................................................... 54 Presence of young people ......................................................................................... 55 Standard of life.............................................................................................................. 57 Physical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Supply Study for Partner Municipalities
    1 INVESTOR: MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC WATERSUPPLY GOVERNANCE P ROJEKAT: STUDIJA U OBLASTI VODOSNABDIJEVANJA ZA PARTNERSKE OPŠTINE P ROJECT: WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR PARTNER MUNICIPALITIES STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BOSANSKI PETROVAC 2011 WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR BOSANSKI PETROVAC MUNICIPALITY Engineering, Design and Consulting Company Bijeljina INVESTOR: UNDP BIH / MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BOSANSKI PETROVAC Projektni tim Odgovornost u projektu Slobodan Tadić Program manager UNDP/MDG-F DEG UNDP BiH Haris Fejzibegović Technical Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG Amel Jakupović Financial Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG Zdravko Stevanović Team Leader Voding 92 doo Vladimir Potparević Technical expert Alen Robović Financial expert Ermin Hajder Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Općina Bosanski Petrovac Merima Kahrić Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Senada Mehdin Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Duško Bosnić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Vodovod i Kanalizacija Huse Jukić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Nadzorni odbor Bosanski Petrovac Jasmin Hamzić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Nebojša Budović Technical expert Andreas Stoisits Technical expert Mirjana Blagovčanin Financial expert Željko Ivanović Financial expert Voding 92 doo Branislav Erić Technical expert Milutin Petrović GIS expert Muzafer Alihodžić GIS expert Bobana Pejčić Translator Željka Ivanović Translator Project Manager: Managing Director: Zdravko Stevanović, civ.eng. Vladimir Potparević, civ.eng. Chapter: Registration 2 WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR BOSANSKI PETROVAC MUNICIPALITY STUDY
    [Show full text]
  • Report on War Crimes Trials in Serbia in 2012 Humanitarian Law Center January 2013
    Report on war crimes trials in Serbia in 2012 Humanitarian Law Center January 2013 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations BIA – Security Intelligence Agency BiH – Bosnia and Herzegovina CC – Criminal Code ECHR – European Convention on Human Rights FRY – Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HLC – Humanitarian Law Center ICTR – International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ICTY – International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia JNA – Yugoslav People’s Army KLA – Kosovo Liberation Army KZJ – Criminal Code of Yugoslavia LAPBM – Liberation Army of Preševo, Bujanovac and Medveđa MUP – Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Serbia PJP – Special Police Units RTS – Radio-Television Serbia SAO Krajina – Serbian Autonomous Region of Krajina SJB – Police station SUP – Secretariat for Internal Affairs of the Republic of Serbia TO – Territorial Defence Force TRZ – Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor VBA – Military Intelligence Agency 2 VJ – Yugoslav Army VRS – Army of Republika Srpska VSS – Supreme Court of Serbia VTO – Military Territorial Detachment CPC – Criminal Procedure Code 3 Introduction The Belgrade High Court (War Crimes Chamber) heard 13 cases of war crimes in 2012 and delivered judgements in seven1, convicting 37 and acquitting eight of the accused persons. The remaining six cases are ongoing.2 During 2012, the Belgrade Court of Appeals (War Crimes Department) delivered four judgements on appeals against decisions of the High Court in Belgrade, confirming the conviction of four defendants3, and finally clearing two accused individuals of criminal charges.4 In 2012, the courts of general jurisdiction heard two cases involving war crimes against the civilian population - the Orahovac/Rahovec case, tried in the High Court in Požarevac and the Kušnin/Kushnin case, tried in the High Court in Niš.
    [Show full text]
  • MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-00-39 & 40-PT THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED CONSOLIDATED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ("the Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC with GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF WAR as set forth below: THE ACCUSED 1. Momcilo KRAJISNIK, son of Sreten and Milka (née Spiric) was born on 20 January 1945 in Zabrdje, municipality of Novi Grad, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. He was a leading member of the Serbian Democratic Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina ("SDS") and he served on a number of SDS bodies and committees. On 12 July 1991, Momcilo KRAJISNIK was elected to the Main Board of the SDS. He was President of the Assembly of Serbian People in Bosnia and Herzegovina ("Bosnian Serb Assembly") from 24 October 1991 until at least November 1995. He was a member of the National Security Council of the Bosnian Serb Republic and from the beginning of June 1992 until 17 December 1992, he was a member of the expanded Presidency of the Bosnian Serb Republic. 2. Biljana PLAVSIC, daughter of Svetislav, was born on 7 July 1930 in Tuzla, Tuzla municipality, Bosnia and Herzegovina. She was a leading member of the SDS from the period of its establishment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. From 18 November 1990 until April 1992, Biljana PLAVSIC was a member of the collective Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Amended Indictment
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CASE NO. IT-99-36-PT THE PROSECUTOROF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST RADOSLAV BRDJANIN MOMIR TALIC THIRD AMENDED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia ("the Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: RADOSLAV BRDJANIN and MOMIR TALIC with GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, GRAVE BREACHES OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949, and VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OR CUSTOMS OF WAR, as set forth below: BACKGROUND 1. In November 1990, democratic elections were held in Bosnia and Herzegovina. There were three main parties, each of which was identified with one of the three principal population groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Party of Democratic Action, the SDA, was identified, in the main, as the Bosnian Muslim national party. The Serbian Democratic Party, the SDS, was identified as the principal Serbian national party. The Croatian Democratic Union, the HDZ, was primarily identified as the Croatian national party. On the Republic level, the SDA won the most seats in the Republic Assembly, followed by the SDS and then the HDZ. The remaining seats were split between other parties, including the former communist party. 2. By the time of the 1990 elections, the difficulties regarding the union of republics within the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ("SFRY") had become apparent. The election results meant that, as time went on, the SDS would be unable through democratic means to keep the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in a Serb-dominated Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping of the Available Business Opportunities in the ESEE Region (D6.1.) Version 2.0 3|2021
    Mapping of the available business Version 2.0 3|2021 opportunities in the ESEE region (D6.1.) KAVA Reference: 17029 ‐ RESEERVE. Mineral potential of the ESEE region Name of the author/Responsible partner: S. Giannakopoulou, K. Adam/ NTUA DOCUMENT CHANGE LOG Document Issue. Date Reasons for change Version 1.0 20.12.2020 Initial version of the document Version 2.0 19.03.2021 Editing issues for RESEERVE website CONTENTS CONTENTS 2 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 8 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 16 2. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 17 2.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION OF PRM ............................................................................. 21 2.2.1 GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ICTY Prosecutor V. Momcilo Perisic
    International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Case: IT-00-39-T Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Date: 27 September 2006 UNITED Committed in the Territory of the NATIONS Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English TRIALU CHAMBER I Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Joaquín Martín Canivell Judge Claude Hanoteau Registrar: Mr Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 27 September 2006 PROSECUTOR v. MOMČILO KRAJIŠNIK _________________________________________________________________________ JUDGEMENT _________________________________________________________________________ OfficeU of the Prosecutor Mr Mark Harmon Mr Alan Tieger Mr Stephen Margetts Mr Fergal Gaynor Ms Carolyn Edgerton Ms Katrina Gustafson DefenceU Counsel Mr Nicholas Stewart, QC Mr David Josse Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik Preliminary ContentsU General abbreviations 6 1. Introduction and overview 9 1.1 The Accused 9 1.2 Indictment 10 1.3 Bosnia-Herzegovina: geography, population, history 12 1.4 Structure of judgement 14 2. Political precursors 16 2.1 Political developments, 1990 to early 1991 16 2.1.1 Creation of the SDS 16 2.1.2 Division of power among the coalition parties 17 2.2 Arming and mobilization of population 19 2.3 State of fear 24 2.4 Creation of Serb autonomous regions and districts 26 2.5 Creation of Bosnian-Serb Assembly 31 2.6 SDS Instructions of 19 December 1991 36 2.7 Proclamation of Bosnian-Serb Republic 43 2.8 Establishment of Bosnian-Serb Republic 50 3. Administration of Bosnian-Serb Republic 54 3.1 Bosnian-Serb
    [Show full text]
  • Further Amended Indictment
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CASE NO. IT-99-36-I THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST RADOSLAV BRDJANIN MOMIR TALIC FURTHER AMENDED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia ("the Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: RADOSLAV BRDJANIN and MOMIR TALIC with GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, GRAVE BREACHES OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949, and VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OR CUSTOMS OF WAR, as set forth below: BACKGROUND 1. In November 1990, democratic elections were held in Bosnia and Herzegovina. There were three main parties, each of which was identified with one of the three principal population groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Party of Democratic Action, the SDA, was identified, in the main, as the Bosnian Muslim national party. The Serbian Democratic Party, the SDS, was identified as the principal Serbian national party. The Croatian Democratic Union, the HDZ, was primarily identified as the Croatian national party. On the Republic level, the SDA won the most seats in the Republic Assembly, followed by the SDS and then the HDZ. The remaining seats were split between other parties, including the former communist party. 2. By the time of the 1990 elections, the difficulties regarding the union of republics within the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ("SFRY") had become apparent. The election results meant that, as time went on, the SDS would be unable through democratic means to keep the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in a Serb-dominated Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Prostorna Osnova
    PROSTORNA PROSTORNI PLAN OPĆINE BOSANSKI PETROVAC 2013-2033.GODINE OSNOVA OPĆINA BOSANSKI PETROVAC UNSKO – SANSKI KANTON PROSTORNI PLAN OPĆINE BOSANSKI PETROVAC ZA PERIOD 2013-2033. godine PROSTORNA OSNOVA IPSA INSTITUT, SARAJEVO 1 PROSTORNA PROSTORNI PLAN OPĆINE BOSANSKI PETROVAC 2013-2033.GODINE OSNOVA PROSTORNI PLAN OPĆINE BOSANSKI PETROVAC za period 2013-2033.godine PROSTORNA OSNOVA Nosilac pripreme Nosilac izrade OPĆINA BOSANSKI PETROVAC IPSA INTITUT Bosanska 110 Put života bb 77 250 Bosanski Petrovac 71000 Sarajevo 037 88 37 51 033 27 63 40 [email protected] [email protected] Stručni planerski tim: Odgovorni planer i koordinator: mr Lejla Hajro, dipl.ing.arh. Prostorni planeri i saradnici: Andrea Pavlović, dipl.ing.arh. mr Lejla Hajro, dipl.ing.arh. Adna Omerbegović, Ma, dipl.ing.arh. Damir Lukić, dipl.ing.arh. Senad Dervišević, dipl.ing.saob. Elvir Alić, dipl.ing.građ. Azra Hajro, dipl.ing.el. Prof.dr.Muhamed Bajrić, dipl.ing.šum. Jasmin Meškić, Ma, dipl.ing.arh. Almas Trtovac, Ma, dipl.ing.arh. Adi Muminović, dipl.ing.arh. Mirza Bašalić, dipl.ing.arh. Broj ugovora: 13/ 7695 Direktor IPSA Instituta: Enko Hubanić, dipl.ing.građ. Sarajevo, decembar 2014.godine 2 PROSTORNA PROSTORNI PLAN OPĆINE BOSANSKI PETROVAC 2013-2033.GODINE OSNOVA Sadržaj Prostorne osnove Prostornog plana općine Bosanski Petrovac I – Tekstualni dio 1. Snimak postojećeg stanja 2. Analiza i ocjena stanja 3. Opći i posebni ciljevi 4. Osnovna koncepcija razvoja II – Grafički dio 0. Izvod iz plana višeg reda 1. Karta namjene zemljišta 1.a. Karta pedologije 1.b. Karta šuma i šumskog zemljišta 2. Karta stanovništva i njegov raspored u prostoru 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 1*Ryki BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE Rf:, FEDERATION of BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA I.JNSKO-SANSKI KANTON the I.JNA
    BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA 1*ryKi BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE rf:, FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA I.JNSKO-SANSKI KANTON THE I.JNA. SANA CANTON VLADA UNSKO.SANSKOG KANTONA 'l UNA-SANA CANTON GOVERNMENT Broj: 03-017-52612019 BnSl;r.i t rlSnCEGC\rillA FFi.--,. ' . r,5111.;,;ii)y;1.gEr Dana; 07 .06.20l9.godine ' .'. _i51 SKUPSTINA UNSKo-SANSKoG KANToNA PREDMET: Izvje5taj o radu JU Zavod za za(titu kulturnog naslijeda za 2018. godinu, dostavlja se Na osnovu dlana 96. stav (2) i 181. Poslovnika SkupStine Unsko-sanskog kantona (,,SluZbeni glasnik Unsko-sanskog kantona", broj: 9ll7), u prilogu vam dostavlja-o IzvjeStaj o radu JU Zavod za zaltitu kulturnog naslijeda za20l8. godinu, uz sljede6e: ObrazloLenje Vlada Unsko-sanskog kantona je na sjednici odrZanoj dana 07.06.2019. godine razmatrala i Zakljudkom broj: 03-017-52612019, prihvatila Izvje5taj o radu JU Zavod za za5titu kulturnog naslijeda za 2018. godinu, predlagada Ministarstva obrazovanja, nauke, kulture i sporta, koji vam se upuiuje u dalju proceduru. S po5tovanjem, Prilog: Izvjestaj o radu JU Zavodzaza$titukultumog naslijeda za2018. godinu (6x) Dostavljeno: l.Naslovu 2.ala BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE ffir FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA UNSKO-SANSKI KANTON THE UNA - SANACANTON VLADA I.JNSKO-SANSKOG KANTONA I.JNA-SANA CANTON GOVERNMENT Na osnovu dlana 16. Zakona o Vladi Unsko-sanskog kantona (,,SluZbeni glasnik Unsko-sanskog kantona", broj: 5/08), na prijedlog Ministarstvaobrazovanja, nauke, kulture i sporta, Vlada Unsko-sanskog kantona na sjednici odrZanoj dana07.06.2019. godine, donosi : ZAKLJUEAK I Prihvata se Izvje5taj o radu JU Zavodzazaititu kultumog naslijeda za2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision on Fourth Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts
    IT-95-5/18-T 36374 D36374 - D36243 UNITED 14 June 2010 TR NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Case No.: IT-95-5/18-T Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Date: 14 June 2010 Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge O-Gon Kwon, Presiding Judge Judge Howard Morrison Judge Melville Baird Judge Flavia Lattanzi, Reserve Judge Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Decision of: 14 June 2010 PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARADŽIĆ PUBLIC DECISION ON FOURTH PROSECUTION MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATED FACTS Office of the Prosecutor Mr. Alan Tieger Ms. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff The Accused Standby Counsel Mr. Radovan Karadžić Mr. Richard Harvey 36373 THIS TRIAL CHAMBER of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 (“Tribunal”) is seised of the “Fourth Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 26 August 2009 (“Motion”) and of the Accused’s “Motion for Reconsideration of Decisions on Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 4 March 2010 (“Motion for Reconsideration”), and hereby renders its decision thereon. I. Background and Submissions 1. The Motion represents the fourth instalment of five motions on judicial notice of adjudicated facts filed by the Office of the Prosecutor (“Prosecution”), and, accordingly, is preceded by the “First Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 27 October 2008 (“First Motion”), the “Second Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts and Corrigendum to First Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 17 March 2009 (“Second Motion”), and the “Third Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 7 April 2009 (“Third Motion”).
    [Show full text]
  • Dodataksmajodejton
    FINAL considerations 2151 2152 * * * The results of up to date scientific research, including results of current scientific research, and other pending studies (fundamental, heuristic, longitudinal and panel studies), of empiric and theoretical character, clearly confirm two initial, basic, relevant, fundamental empiric and scientific facts surrounding contemporary events and situations in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina at the end of the 20th century: - first, aclassic armed aggression was carried against the Republic od Bosnia and Herzegovina, that is, crime against peace and safety of humanity, which is, according to basic interpretation, understanding and definition, an international armed conflict, and - second, the gravest crime of all was committed in the occupied territories of an independent and internationally recognized Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, a member of the United Nations, in towns under siege and in the territory of the United Nations – UN Safe Areas, including the free territories, against Bosniacs, members of (protected) national, ethnic, and religious groups as such – a crime of genocide. Serbian nationalistic elite (intellectual, political, military, and clerical), in the nineties of the 20th century, based on a political and genocidal project – Serbian great-state project “all Serbs in one state”, whose primary objective is made of setting up a single (great) Serbian state in the Balkans, in which “the whole Serbian population” would live – “uniting all Serbs in the same state structure”, which (project)
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaped Regionalization of Una - Sana Canton
    Acta geographica Bosniae et Herzegovinae 2016, 5, 19-27 Original scientific paper __________________________________________________________________________________ LANDSCAPED REGIONALIZATION OF UNA - SANA CANTON Aida Korjenić University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Zmaja od Bosne 33-35, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina For the purposes of regional and spatial planning microregionalization are of the most importance. In the complex allocation of geographical units are analyzed and mapped the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of each of the geocomponents. Based on the processed identification physical-geographic factor and analysis of existing socio - geographic features of the Una-Sana Canton, previously separated three physiognomic unit size of areas. In this paper went further in regionalization and defining smaller territorial units, sub- areas. Within three areas singled out seven sub-areas, and qualitative method of valorization is determined by their purpose. Key words: landscaped regionalization, Una Sana Canton, sub-area INTRODUCTIONS Physical geographical regionalization is considered one of the main problems of modern physical geography. It consists of a sepa- ration of individual territorial units, physical-geographic region that objecti- vely exist in nature and together form the geographical environment. The scientific significance of the physical regionaliza- tion is that the separation of individual regions is performed on the basis of a detailed study of the natural characteristics of certain territories and establishing the principles that led to the spatial differenti- ation of natural processes in it. Such concerns have led to the formation and development of specific territorial units, higher or lower rank. The current geo- graphical regionalization of Bosnia and Herzegovina was performed mainly in two levels or degrees: macro (region) and mesoregional level (sub-region).
    [Show full text]