DOCSLIB.ORG

Dodataksmajodejton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dodataksmajodejton FINAL considerations 2151 2152 * * * The results of up to date scientific research, including results of current scientific research, and other pending studies (fundamental, heuristic, longitudinal and panel studies), of empiric and theoretical character, clearly confirm two initial, basic, relevant, fundamental empiric and scientific facts surrounding contemporary events and situations in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina at the end of the 20th century: - first, aclassic armed aggression was carried against the Republic od Bosnia and Herzegovina, that is, crime against peace and safety of humanity, which is, according to basic interpretation, understanding and definition, an international armed conflict, and - second, the gravest crime of all was committed in the occupied territories of an independent and internationally recognized Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, a member of the United Nations, in towns under siege and in the territory of the United Nations – UN Safe Areas, including the free territories, against Bosniacs, members of (protected) national, ethnic, and religious groups as such – a crime of genocide. Serbian nationalistic elite (intellectual, political, military, and clerical), in the nineties of the 20th century, based on a political and genocidal project – Serbian great-state project “all Serbs in one state”, whose primary objective is made of setting up a single (great) Serbian state in the Balkans, in which “the whole Serbian population” would live – “uniting all Serbs in the same state structure”, which (project) along with the Yugoslav program, has lived among the Serbian ideas for more than two centuries, resulted in an internal crisis in the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia and devastated a common state; 2153 - The Milošević’s nationalistic politics and practice of massive meetings and demonstrations (around five million people participated in the 1988-1989 demonstrations) and the methods of coup (“bureaucratic anti- revolution”) removed (in late 1988 and early 1989) in Serbia, Vojvodina, Kosovo, and Montenegro, the legitimately elected leadership and “unwanted” personnel; - The Republic of Serbia, by the revision of the 1974 Constitution, and adoption of the new Constitution on 28 September 1990, annulled the autonomy of Vojvodina and Kosovo, and practically got separated (from SFRY), destroyed the SFRY constitutional order (carried out the coup d’état against the federal Constitution and “legal aggression against the constitutional system of Yugoslavia”), assumed functions of “new independent Serbian state”, thus excluded itself from the SFRY legal system, which was the gravest offense according to the SFRY laws, and finally began with the establishment of Great Serbia even before the (multi- party) elections; - a collaborator regime was set up in Montenegro; - the Republic of Serbia attacked the SFRY monetary system (9 January 1991) – Slobodan Milošević seized reserves in gold, kept abroad, worth 1.4 billion USD; - a process of homogenization of Serbs was expedited, particularly in Bosnia and Herzegovina; - a political project – unification of all Serbs – setting up of a great, ethnic (Serbian) state was massively supported by the Serbian Academy of Science and Arts, Association of writers in Serbia, Serbian Orthodox church, Yugoslav national army (“YNA”)/Army of Yugoslavia, political and cultural institutions, along with, unfortunately, massive nonselective support of Serbian people; Intent (mens rea) of this criminal act, based and demonstrated in Serbian, as well as in Croatian, great-state project was to occupy and destroy the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “finally resolve” the Muslim 2154 issue – destruction of Bosniacs or their downsizing to insignificant ethnic and religious group. The pseudo-state creations and servile fifth-column from Bosnia and Herzegovina acted obediently and as direct associates and executors in these criminal activities (“Croatian community Herzeg- Bosnia”/“Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia”, “Republic of Serbians in Bosnia and Herzegovina”/“Republika Srpska” and “Autonomous Province of West Bosnia”) and from the Republic of Croatia (“Republic of Serbian Krajina”). The state aggressors (Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia), applying the Nazi models, designed, planned, prepared, organized, set up, supervised, armed, trained, and issued orders to these collaborators. However, they served as marionette regimes of the aggressor states, which guided and controlled them, as they were dependent of them. In fact, they acted in their name – as the authorities of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia. To achieve this criminal enterprise, the aggressors, particularly Serbia and Montenegro, in line with the strategic plans, executed the planned activities: - constitutional concept of defense of SFRY was destroyed; - Republics and Provinces were deprived of their sovereign rights in the area of organization and supervision over the territorial defense, equal component of the SFRY armed forces, so that they were subordinated and placed under the full control of YNA; - Territorial defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina was downsized and disarmed, including some other constituent elements of SFRY; - YNA was “transformed” from antifascist, Yugoslav, peoples, and multiethnic army to great-Serbian army; - Fascistic movements were renewed and the great-Serbian and great-Croatian movements escalated; - Methods, mechanisms, and acts of planning, organization, and preparation of crimes were defined; 2155 - Principle agreement (March 1991) on destruction of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina was made between the heads of neighboring states (Pact Milošević - Tuđman); - Boundaries of “great Serbia” and “great Croatia” were defined; - The fifth column (great-Serbian and great-Croatian) of the neighboring states was set up in Bosnia and Herzegovina; - Initial positions for the aggression and other criminal activities, including the genocide against Bosniacs were taken; - - Control and command in the occupied territories were unified in hands of the heads of neighboring states – forces of occupation; - Responsible function holders for specific activities under certain conditions were identified and appointed; their objectives, methods, means, and effects were identified – results and consequences. These are the crimes against humanity and international law, grave violations of international humanitarian law, based in fascistic ideology, politics, and practice, which were operationalized through two great- state projects, two genocidal policies, two joint criminal enterprises, two nationalistic movements, two states, two or better to say three collaborators and fifth-column creations, two armed forces, four collaborator armed formations and many more other armed units and groups, including foreign mercenaries (Russians, Greeks, etc.). Such a fascistic ideology, politics, and practice, of aggressive and genocidal character, aimed at setting up of great- Serbian and great-Croatian state to the detriment of the independent and sovereign Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Objective of those ideologies and policies was the aggressive war aimed at expansion of territory (“war for territories”, territorial expansion), war for “living space”, for stealing the Bosnia and Herzegovina land, and destruction of Bosniacs, national, ethnic, and religious group as such. 2156 Findings of the up to date studies identified and stated scientific facts, which confirm and prove the scientific truth, whose important determinants, inter alia, are: - the aggression against the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and genocide against Bosniacs were planned (intellectually, ideologically, politically, militarily, economically, psychologically, by means of media and intelligence, etc.) with clear objectives, ordered, directed, organized, and pursued from competent political and military positions, executed as per plan, systematically, and organized; - the Belgrade and Zagreb regimes, under the leadership of Slobodan Milošević and Franjo Tuđman: planned, prepared, directed, organized, and pursued aggression against the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and genocide against Bosniacs; controlled and commanded the aggression; operationally planned, prepared, directed, and with their own armed forces (Yugoslav national army/Yugoslav Army, Croatian Army, “Army of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina”/“Republika Srpska Army”, “Republic of Serbian Krajina”, “Croatian Defense Council” and “National defense of the Autonomous Province of West Bosnia”) waged military operations against the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina; ensured manpower (commanders and soldiers), full logistic and financial support (tanks, transporters, helicopters, artillery and infantry weapons, radars, explosives, ammunition, fuel, oils, and other strategic raw materials), medical material, healthcare insurance and all other military equipment, salaries and pensions, and in this way directly participated in commission of genocide and other forms of crimes against humanity and international law; - armed aggression, the aggressive war against Bosnia and Herzegovina, was an essential component of the Milošević’s and Tuđman’s state policies, in whose names the biggest portions of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina were occupied, and Bosniacs killed, expelled, and taken to concentration camps, just on the ground of their national, ethnic, or religious background and conquering
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Study for Partner Municipalities
    1 INVESTOR: MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC WATERSUPPLY GOVERNANCE P ROJEKAT: STUDIJA U OBLASTI VODOSNABDIJEVANJA ZA PARTNERSKE OPŠTINE P ROJECT: WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR PARTNER MUNICIPALITIES STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BOSANSKI PETROVAC 2011 WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR BOSANSKI PETROVAC MUNICIPALITY Engineering, Design and Consulting Company Bijeljina INVESTOR: UNDP BIH / MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BOSANSKI PETROVAC Projektni tim Odgovornost u projektu Slobodan Tadić Program manager UNDP/MDG-F DEG UNDP BiH Haris Fejzibegović Technical Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG Amel Jakupović Financial Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG Zdravko Stevanović Team Leader Voding 92 doo Vladimir Potparević Technical expert Alen Robović Financial expert Ermin Hajder Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Općina Bosanski Petrovac Merima Kahrić Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Senada Mehdin Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Duško Bosnić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Vodovod i Kanalizacija Huse Jukić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Nadzorni odbor Bosanski Petrovac Jasmin Hamzić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Nebojša Budović Technical expert Andreas Stoisits Technical expert Mirjana Blagovčanin Financial expert Željko Ivanović Financial expert Voding 92 doo Branislav Erić Technical expert Milutin Petrović GIS expert Muzafer Alihodžić GIS expert Bobana Pejčić Translator Željka Ivanović Translator Project Manager: Managing Director: Zdravko Stevanović, civ.eng. Vladimir Potparević, civ.eng. Chapter: Registration 2 WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR BOSANSKI PETROVAC MUNICIPALITY STUDY
    [Show full text]
  • Raspored Dostave Na Otoke I Ostala Mjesta Nalazi Se U
    RASPORED DOSTAVE U MJESTA U KOJA NE DOSTAVLJAMO SVAKI DAN Poštanski broj Mjesto Grad PON UT SRI ČET PET SUB NAPOMENA 31214 Ada Laslovo • • • 53271 Alan Krivi Put • 31205 Aljmaš Aljmaš • • 32271 Andrijaševci Rokovci Andrijaševci • • • 31224 Andrijevac Koška • • • 52466 Antenal Novigrad (Cittanova) PO POTREBI JEDNOM TJEDNO 52463 Antonci Višnjan • • • 21246 Aržano Aržano • • • 52470 Babići Umag • • • 52463 Bačva • • 35404 Baćin Dol Cernik • • 40313 Banfi Sveti Martin na Muri • • • 35404 Banićevac Cernik • • 20232 Banići Slano • • • 33513 Bankovci Zdenci • • 32247 Banovci Banovci • • • 35254 Banovci Bebrina • • 51280 Banjol Rab • • 32235 Bapska Bapska • • 31322 Baranjsko Petrovo Selo Baranjsko Petrovo Selo • • 52352 Barat Kanfanar • • 51280 Barbat na Rabu Rab • • 53289 Barić Draga Lukovo Šugarje • 52420 Barušići Buzet • • 52475 Bašanija Savudrija • • • 53206 Baške Oštarije Brušane • 51251 Bater Ledenice • • 31306 Batina Batina • • • 35254 Bebrina Bebrina • • RASPORED DOSTAVE U MJESTA U KOJA NE DOSTAVLJAMO SVAKI DAN Poštanski broj Mjesto Grad PON UT SRI ČET PET SUB NAPOMENA 51300 Begovo Razdolje Mrkopalj PO POTREBI JEDNOM TJEDNO 31403 Beketinci Vuka • • • 31511 Beljevina Đurđenovac • • 31542 Beničanci Magadenovac • • • 32243 Berak Orolik • • 31433 Bijela Loza Podgorač • • • 31204 Bijelo Brdo Bijelo Brdo • • 33515 Bijeljevina Orahovička Orahovica • • 51252 Bile Klenovica • • 22321 Biočić Siverić • • 21270 Biokovsko Selo Zagvozd • • 53250 Birovača Donji Lapac • 47300 Bjelsko Ogulin • 20356 Blace Blace • 31540 Blanje Donji Miholjac • • 51326
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Donje Podunavlje
    SADRŽAJ I ZADACI .............................................................................................................................................. 1 II PROCEDURE ..................................................................................................................................... 2 III SITUACIONA ANALIZA ..................................................................................................................... 5 1. Analiza prostornih karakteristika područja i društveno-ekonomskog okruženja ........................ 5 1.1. Republika Srbija............................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. Geografske karakteristike Republike Srbije ........................................................... 5 1.1.2. Ekonomski razvoj Republike Srbije ........................................................................ 6 1.1.2.1. Osnovni strateški pravci i prioriteti privrednog razvoja Srbije ............................ 6 1.1.2.2. Makroekonomske projekcije razvoja Srbije do 2012. godine............................. 8 1.1.2.3. Mehanizmi i politike za ostvarivanje ciljeva nacionalne strategije ..................... 9 1.2. Turističko područje „Donje Podunavlje“ ......................................................................... 12 1.2.1. Geografske karakteristike .................................................................................... 12 1.2.2. Lokacija i društveno-ekonomski razvoj................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Grmeč-94” I Protunapad Vojske Republike Srpske I Srpske Vojske Krajine
    II. O(p)stanak u stoljeću rata Darjan Godić PROSTOR BIVŠE OPĆINE ZAVALJE U NAPADNOJ OPERACIJI ARMIJE BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE “GRMEČ-94” I PROTUNAPAD VOJSKE REPUBLIKE SRPSKE I SRPSKE VOJSKE KRAJINE Darjan Godić prethodno priopćenje Hrvatski institut za povijest Opatička 10 10 000 Zagreb, Republika Hrvatska Na temelju izvorne arhivske građe autor obrađuje djelovanje 5. korpusa ABiH i 101. pukovnije HVO u napadnoj operaciji “Grmeč-94” i protunapad VRS i SVK. Cilj srpskog protunapada bio je zauzimanje područja zapadne Bosne i grada Bihaća. Poseban naglasak stavljen je na tijek borbenih djelovanja na širem prostoru bivše općine Zavalje. Ključne riječi: Rat u BiH, Operacija Grmeč, Kulen Vakuf; 1.) Vojno-političko stanje na području zapadne Bosne uoči napadne operacije “Grmeč-94” Zapadna Bosna nalazila se u okruženju i bila je potpuno odvojena od neokupi- ranih dijelova Bosne i Hercegovine (BiH). Okruženje su činila područja Republike Srpske (RS) s istoka i juga i Republike Srpske Krajine (RSK) sa sjevera i zapada.484 Područje zapadne Bosne branio je 5. korpus Armije Bosne i Hercegovine (ABiH). Krajem 1994. korpus se sastojao od: Komande korpusa, 501. brdske brigade, 502. brdske brigade, 503. brdske brigade, 505. brdske brigade, 506. oslobodilačke bri- gade, 1. oslobodilačke brigade, 511. brdske brigade, 517. lake brigade, bataljuna vojne policije, 5. tenkovske čete, 5. mješovitog artiljerijskog divizijuna, 5. mješovite protuoklopne baterije, 5. inženjerijskog bataljuna, 5. logističke baze, nastavno-re- grutnog centra, izviđačke čete i 101. pukovnije Hrvatskog vijeća obrane (HVO). 484 Sekulić, Milisav. Knin je pao u Beogradu. Nidda Verlag, Bad Vilbel, 2001., 89 − 90. 197 Podplješivički graničari / I. - 2017. Peti korpus ABiH vezivao je dio snaga Vojske Republike Srpske (VRS) i Srpske vojske Krajine (SVK) i onemogućavao da se one upotrebe na drugim dijelovima ratišta, bilo u Hrvatskoj, bilo u BiH.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Housing and Return Projects in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    NORWEGIAN HOUSING AND RETURN PROJECTS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Report by Karin Lisa Kirkengen NORDEM Report 18/2006 Copyright: the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights/NORDEM and Karin Lisa Kirkengen. NORDEM, the Norwegian Resource Bank for Democracy and Human Rights, is a programme of the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights (NCHR), and has as its main objective to actively promote international human rights. NORDEM is jointly administered by NCHR and the Norwegian Refugee Council. NORDEM works mainly in relation to multilateral institutions. The operative mandate of the programme is realised primarily through the recruitment and deployment of qualified Norwegian personnel to international assignments that promote democratisation and respect for human rights. The programme is responsible for the training of personnel before deployment and reporting on completed assignments, and plays a role in research related to areas of active involvement. The vast majority of assignments are channelled through the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. NORDEM Report is a series of reports documenting NORDEM activities and is published jointly by NORDEM and the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights. Series editor: Hege Mørk Series consultants: Turid Wulff Knutsen, Christian Boe Astrup The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher. ISSN: 1503–1330 ISBN 10: 82-8158-032-1 ISBN 13: 978-82-8158-032-9 NORDEM Report is available online at: http://www.humanrights.uio.no/forskning/publ/publikasjonsliste.html Preface The report was commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the beginning of 2005 and it was researched and written between February 2005 and February 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategija Za Razvoj Turizma U Prekograničnom Području Gornjeg Toka Rijeke Une
    Strategija za razvoj turizma u prekograničnom području gornjeg toka rijeke Une SADRŽAJ POPIS SLIKA ...............................................................................................4 1. UVOD ................................................................................................8 2. ANALIZA OKRUŽENJA ............................................................................ 10 2.1. DEFINIRANJE ŠIREG I UŽEG PODRUČJA OBUHVATA – GORNJI TOK RIJEKE UNE ..................... 10 2.1.1. Zaštićena područja NP Una .......................................................... 12 2.2. ZEMLJOPISNI POLOŽAJ I PROMETNA POVEZANOST ................................................ 14 2.2.1. Općina Bihać ........................................................................... 14 2.2.2. Općina Gračac ......................................................................... 15 2.2.3. Općina Donji Lapac .................................................................... 16 2.3. KLIMA .......................................................................................... 17 2.3.1. Općina Bihać ........................................................................... 17 2.3.2. Općine Gračac i Donji Lapac ......................................................... 18 2.4. GEOLOŠKA I HIDROLOŠKA OBILJEŽJA (KARAKTERISTIKE ) GORNJEG TOKA RIJEKE UNE ............. 18 2.4.1. Bioraznolikost .......................................................................... 20 2.5. DEMOGRAFSKI ASPEKTI .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pilar-Z-004-Duge Sjene Perife
    DUGE SJENE PERIFERIJE Prinos revitalizaciji hrvatskoga ruba Biblioteka ZBORNICI, knjiga 4 Copyright © 1998. Institut dru{tvenih znanosti IVO PILAR, Zagreb CIP – Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i sveu~ili{na knji`nica, Zagreb UDK 316.334.56 (497.5-21) (082) DUGE sjene periferije : prinos revitalizaciji hrvatskoga ruba / uredili Ivan Rogi}, Maja [tambuk. - Zagreb : Institut dru{tvenih znanosti Ivo Pilar, 1998. - 167 str. ; 24 cm. - (Biblioteka Zbornici ; knj. 4) Bibliografija: str. 157-158. - Summary. ISBN 953-6666-03-0 1. Rogi}, Ivan 2. [tambuk, Maja 981112012 ISBN 953-6666-03-0 DUGE SJENE PERIFERIJE Prinos revitalizaciji hrvatskoga ruba Uredili: Ivan Rogi} Maja [tambuk Zagreb, 1998. Ovaj zbornik sadr`ava tekstove nastale kao rezultat po~etnog istra`ivanja u okviru teme Sustavno o`ivljavanje hrvatskih periferija, koje je, kao dio programa trajne znan- stvenoistra`iva~ke djelatnosti Instituta dru{tvenih znanosti Ivo Pilar, provedeno 1997. Naziv je programa Socijalna struktura i socijalna integracija. Nerazvijenost hrvatske periferije, nepostojanje trans- parentnoga pristupa njezinu cjelovitu napretku u bli`oj budu}nosti, kao i nerazumijevanje potrebe da u temeljima svakoga periferijskog razvojnog projekta budu prepoznat- ljivi op}i (nacionalni) i lokalni ciljevi, stavlja dru{tvene istra`iva~e pred barem dvije zada}e: 1. kriti~no promi{ljati i istra`iva~ki provjeravati razvojni(e) koncept(e) hrvatske periferije, s obzirom na stanje i neka njezina specifi~na obilje`ja; 2. na temelju rezultata akcijskih istra`ivanja olak{ati i pobolj{ati odluke o dru{tvenim, gospodarskim i drugim investicijama s u~inkovitijim rezultatima. Planira- mo, stoga, osim ovoga zbornika, objaviti rezultate novih istra`ivanja kako bismo jasnije odredili odnos periferija/ modernizacija.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Management Framework Public Disclosure Authorized Floods Emergency Recovery Project Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina September, 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized CONTROL SHEET Client: Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry Project: Floods Emergency Recovery Project (FERP) Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Title: Environmental Management Framework Status: Final Document Accounting Code: D-1172 Registry No.: UP-02-996/11 Project manager: Internal control: Director: Name and surname, Dr Irem Silajdžić, M.Sc Sanda Midžić Prof. dr. Tarik title B.Sc.Envtl.Eng. Kurtagić, Kupusović, B.Sc.C.E. B.Sc.C.E. DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE 15.08.2014 i GENERAL DATA Consultant: Hydro-Engineering Institute of Civil Engineering Faculty Sarajevo Stjepana Tomića 1 71000 Sarajevo tel: + 387 33 212 466/7 fax: + 387 33 207 949 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.heis.com.ba Project Dr Irem Silajdžić, M.SC. Environmental Technology, B.Sc. Environmental Engineering team: Melina Džajić Valjevac, M.Sc. Chemistry Vukašin Balta, M.Sc. Geology Admir Alađuz, B.Sc Biology Selma Osmanagić Klico, expert for environmental law ii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BAM – the currency code for Convertible Marka B&H – Bosnia and Herzegovina BP – Bank Procedure EA – Environmental Assessment EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EIS – Environmental Impact Study EMF – Environmental Management Framework EMP – Environmental Management
    [Show full text]
  • Statut Grada Bihaća 1077 414
    SLUŽBENI GLASNIK GRADA BIHAĆA 6. novembra 2015. Izdanje na bosanskom Broj 13 / 2015. BIHAĆ jeziku 399. građana u odlučivanju i izjašnjavanju o pitanjima iz samoupravnog djelokruga Grada, imovina i Na osnovu člana VI (2). Ustava Federacije finansiranje Grada, propisi i drugi akti organa Bosne i Hercegovine, člana 13. Zakona o Grada, donošenje i promjene Statuta, javnost rada principima lokalne samouprave u Federaciji Bosne i informisanje, odnos Grada i građana, kao i druga i Hercegovine ("Službene novine Federacije Bosne pitanja od značaja za organizaciju i rad Grada i Hercegovine", broj 49/06), a u skladu sa članom Bihaća. 7. Zakona o Gradu Bihać ("Službene novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine", broj 80/14) i Član 2. člana 8. Statutarne odluke o organizaciji Grada (Definicija Grada) Bihaća u skladu sa Zakonom o Gradu Bihać (1) Grad Bihać je jedinica lokalne samouprave ("Službeni glasnik Grada Bihaća" broj:1/14), sa pravima i obavezama utvrđenim Ustavom, Gradsko vijeće Bihać, na svojoj 16. sjednici Zakonom i ovim Statutom. održanoj dana 04.11.2015.godine, usvojilo je (2) Grad Bihać je pravni sljednik Općine Bihać i preuzima nadležnosti, prava, obaveze i imovinu STATUT Općine, čiji je pravni sljednik. GRADA BIHAĆA Član 3. (Teritorijalna pripadnost) DIO PRVI - OPĆE ODREDBE Grad Bihać se nalazi u Unsko-sanskom kantonu i sjedište je Kantona. Član 1. (Predmet) Član 4. (Područje Grada) Slijedeći principe iz Evropske povelje o lokalnoj samoupravi ovim Statutom se uređuju opće (1) Područje Grada Bihaća je dio državnog odredbe, statusna obilježja Grada Bihaća, teritorija Bosne i Hercegovine i Federacije Bosne ostvarivanje i zaštita ljudskih prava i osnovnih i Hercegovine.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on War Crimes Trials in Serbia in 2012 Humanitarian Law Center January 2013
    Report on war crimes trials in Serbia in 2012 Humanitarian Law Center January 2013 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations BIA – Security Intelligence Agency BiH – Bosnia and Herzegovina CC – Criminal Code ECHR – European Convention on Human Rights FRY – Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HLC – Humanitarian Law Center ICTR – International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ICTY – International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia JNA – Yugoslav People’s Army KLA – Kosovo Liberation Army KZJ – Criminal Code of Yugoslavia LAPBM – Liberation Army of Preševo, Bujanovac and Medveđa MUP – Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Serbia PJP – Special Police Units RTS – Radio-Television Serbia SAO Krajina – Serbian Autonomous Region of Krajina SJB – Police station SUP – Secretariat for Internal Affairs of the Republic of Serbia TO – Territorial Defence Force TRZ – Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor VBA – Military Intelligence Agency 2 VJ – Yugoslav Army VRS – Army of Republika Srpska VSS – Supreme Court of Serbia VTO – Military Territorial Detachment CPC – Criminal Procedure Code 3 Introduction The Belgrade High Court (War Crimes Chamber) heard 13 cases of war crimes in 2012 and delivered judgements in seven1, convicting 37 and acquitting eight of the accused persons. The remaining six cases are ongoing.2 During 2012, the Belgrade Court of Appeals (War Crimes Department) delivered four judgements on appeals against decisions of the High Court in Belgrade, confirming the conviction of four defendants3, and finally clearing two accused individuals of criminal charges.4 In 2012, the courts of general jurisdiction heard two cases involving war crimes against the civilian population - the Orahovac/Rahovec case, tried in the High Court in Požarevac and the Kušnin/Kushnin case, tried in the High Court in Niš.
    [Show full text]
  • Pregled Izdanja 2014 Drugo Iz
    PREGLED IZDANJA ANUBiH 2003–2012. DOI 10.5644/PI 2013-154 PREGLED IZDANJA AKADEMIJE NAUKA I UMJETNOSTI BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE 2003–2012. Izdavač Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine Za izdavača Miloš Trifković Glavni urednik Husref Tahirović Redakcioni odbor Vlatko Doleček, Taib Šarić, Zijo Pašić, Miloš Trifković Popis sastavila Zenaida Karavdić Lektor/korektor Zenaida Karavdić DTP TDP Sarajevo Štampa Štamparija Fojnica Tiraž 250 Sarajevo, 2014. CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 016:061.12(497.6)”2003/2012” PREGLED izdanja Akademije nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine 2003-2012. / glavni urednik Husref Tahirović ; [popis sastavila Zenaida Karavdić]. - 2. izd. = 2nd ed. - Sarajevo : Akademija nauka i umjetnosti BiH = Academy of sciences and arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2014. - 154 str. ; 24 cm. - (Posebna izdanja ; knj. 157 / Akademija nauka i umjetnosti BiH) Na spor. nasl. str.: Survey of the publications of the Academy of sciences and arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2003-2012. – Registar. ISBN 978-9958-501-97-5 1. Stv. nasl. na upor. nasl. str. COBISS.BH-ID 21662726 SADRŽAJ PREDGOVOR ................................................................................................................... xv ČASOPISI / JOURNALS ................................................................................................... 1 ACTA MEDICA ACADEMICA ....................................................................................... 1 Acta Medica Academica.
    [Show full text]