Mapping of the Available Business Opportunities in the ESEE Region (D6.1.) Version 2.0 3|2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mapping of the Available Business Opportunities in the ESEE Region (D6.1.) Version 2.0 3|2021 Mapping of the available business Version 2.0 3|2021 opportunities in the ESEE region (D6.1.) KAVA Reference: 17029 ‐ RESEERVE. Mineral potential of the ESEE region Name of the author/Responsible partner: S. Giannakopoulou, K. Adam/ NTUA DOCUMENT CHANGE LOG Document Issue. Date Reasons for change Version 1.0 20.12.2020 Initial version of the document Version 2.0 19.03.2021 Editing issues for RESEERVE website CONTENTS CONTENTS 2 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 8 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 16 2. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 17 2.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION OF PRM ............................................................................. 21 2.2.1 GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ............................................................................................... 21 2.2.2 FINANCIAL DATA ............................................................................................................ 21 2.2.3 OTHER ASPECTS ............................................................................................................. 22 2.3 CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION OF SRM .............................................................................. 22 2.3.1 WASTE POTENTIAL ........................................................................................................ 22 2.3.2 WASTE TYPE ................................................................................................................... 22 2.3.3 FINANCIAL DATA ............................................................................................................ 23 2.3.4 OTHER ASPECTS ............................................................................................................. 23 3. EVALUATION OF PRM ..................................................................................................... 24 3.1 ALBANIA (ALB) ....................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.1 GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ............................................................................................... 24 3.1.2 FINANCIAL DATA ............................................................................................................ 28 3.1.3 OTHER ASPECTS ............................................................................................................. 29 3.2 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (BiH) ......................................................................................... 31 3.2.1 GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ............................................................................................... 31 3.2.2 FINANCIAL DATA ............................................................................................................ 36 3.2.3 OTHER ASPECTS ............................................................................................................. 37 3.3 CROATIA (HRV) ...................................................................................................................... 39 3.3.1 GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ............................................................................................... 39 3.3.2 FINANCIAL DATA ............................................................................................................ 43 3.3.3 OTHER ASPECTS ............................................................................................................. 43 3.4 MONTENEGRO (MNE) ........................................................................................................... 45 3.4.1 GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ............................................................................................... 45 3.4.2 FINANCIAL DATA ............................................................................................................ 47 3.4.3 OTHER ASPECTS ............................................................................................................. 47 3.4.4 SCREENING EXERSICE FOR MNE .................................................................................... 48 3.5 REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA (MKD) ............................................................................ 50 3.5.1 GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ............................................................................................... 50 3.5.2 FINANCIAL DATA ............................................................................................................ 53 Page 2 | 171 3.5.3 OTHER ASPECTS ............................................................................................................. 54 3.6 SERBIA (SRB) .......................................................................................................................... 56 3.6.1 GEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ............................................................................................... 56 3.6.2 FINANCIAL DATA ............................................................................................................ 59 3.6.3 OTHER ASPECTS ............................................................................................................. 59 3.6.4 SCREENING EXERSICE FOR SRB ...................................................................................... 60 4. EVALUATION OF SRM ..................................................................................................... 62 4.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 62 4.2 WASTE TYPES IN ESEE COUNTRIES ........................................................................................ 63 4.3 SRM RESOURCES IN ESEE COUNTRIES ................................................................................... 69 4.4 OTHER ASPECTS ..................................................................................................................... 75 5. SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................... 76 5.1 BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES OF PRM ...................................................................................... 76 5.2 BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES OF SRM ...................................................................................... 82 5.3 CRM IN PRMs and SRMs ........................................................................................................ 84 6. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 86 6.1 RESEERVE Project .................................................................................................................. 86 6.2 External references ............................................................................................................... 86 ANNEXES 90 ANNEX I. QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TASK PARTNERS ..................................................................... 91 ANNEX II. QUESTIONNAIRE FOR INDUSTRIAL STAKEHOLDERS ................................................. 100 ANNEX III. PRM RESOURCES OF THE 6 ESEE COUNTRIES (MINES/QUARRIES/GREENFIELDS) ....... 105 ANNEX IV. METAL PRICES & METAL PRODUCTS VARIATIONS IN THE PERIOD 2011-2020 ............ 139 ANNEX V. SRM, IMPORTANT PROCESSING WASTE SITES OF THE 6 ESEE COUNTRIES ................. 159 ANNEX VI. MAPS .....................................................................................................................163 Page 3 | 171 List of Figures Figure 2.1-1: 1 in 1,000 exploration projects becomes a mine (Graphic Courtesy Fraser Institute). ... 18 Figure 2.1-2: Number of Industrial stakeholders conducted with questionnaires at examined ESEE countries. Map created using ArcGIS 10.5.1. ........................................................................................ 19 Figure 3.1-1: World players in chromium ore production (2017), including ALB ................................. 28 Figure 3.4-1: Main Factors impacting exploration/exploitation; Brskovo project, Tara Resources AG / Brskovo Mine d.o.o, October 2020. ...................................................................................................... 49 Figure 3.4-2: Level of satisfaction with prevailing conditions for development, permitting and operation of mining activities; Brskovo project, Tara Resources AG / Brskovo Mine d.o.o, October 2020 ....................................................................................................................................................... 49 Figure 3.5-1: International Lead ore production, highlighting the share in MKD. ................................ 53 Figure 3.6-1: Main Factors impacting exploration/exploitation; Babe project, Balkan Exploration and Mining d.o.o.,
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
    [Show full text]
  • Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Albania Annual Report 2012
    Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Extractive Industries Albania Transparency Initiative in Albania ReportAnnual for theReport year 2012 November 2014 Table of contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 8 2. Overview of the extractive sector in Albania 11 3. Overview of flows reported and reporting entities 37 4. Approach, methodology and work done 38 5. Reconciliation summary 41 6. Results of the reconciliation 42 7. Lessons learned and recommendations 51 Glossary and abbreviations 55 Appendix 1: Disaggregated reconciliation from the oil and gas sector 56 Appendix 2: Disaggregated reconciliation from the mining sector 58 Deloitte Audit Albania sh.p.k Rr. Elbasanit. Pallati poshte Fakulteti Gjeologji- Miniera Tirana, Albania Tel: +355 4 45 17 920 Fax: +355 4 45 17 990 www.deloitte.al VAT (NUIS) No: L41709002H The Albanian Working Group c/o Ministry of Energy and Industry “Deshmoret e Kombit” Blv. Tirana, Albania Report of factual findings - assembly and reconciliation of cash flows This report summarizes the result of the reconciliation of cash flows from the petroleum and mining activities as part of the implementation of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Albania for the year 2012. The report consists of seven chapters. Chapter 1 describes the background and objective of the reporting. Chapter 2 provides contextual information on the industry. The reporting, compilation, and reconciliation processes are presented in chapters 3 and 4. Chapter 5 provides a short summary of the reconciliation. In chapter 6, the compilation and reconciliation of payments is presented on an aggregated level. Lessons learned during this year’s reconciliation are summarized in chapter 7.
    [Show full text]
  • EBRD-Project-Progress-Report-As-Of
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JP Autoceste FBiH d.o.o. Mostar PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT As of 31st December, 2018 Project: CONSTRUCTION OF MOTORWAYS IN THE FEDERATION OF B&H Mostar, January 2019 CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 Project description ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. LOAN AGREEMENTS .............................................................................................................. 5 3. PROCUREMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................ 7 4. MAIN DESIGN ..................................................................................................................... 10 5. PREPARATORY ACTIVITIES FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ........... Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.1. Section Poprikuša - Nemila ....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.3 5.2. Section Northern Border of the municipality Zenica (Nemila) - Zenica North (D. Gračanica) Error! Bookmark not defined.3 5.2.1. Subsection Nemila - Vranduk ................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.3 5.2.2. Subsection Vranduk - Ponirak .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.2.3. Subsection Ponirak - Vraca .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. YUGOSLAVIA) PKELIMINARY OBJECTIONS JUNE 1995 I TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS .............................. 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 3 FACTS ........................................... 7 1.1. Relevant facts from the past of Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................. 7 1.2. The creation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the status of Muslims in that State . 11 1.3. Genocide committed against the Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Second World War . 12 1.4. The stati~sof Muslims in Bosnia-Herzegovina in post-war socialist Yugoslavia ................ 20 1.5. The first cirisis in inter-ethnic relations in post-war socialist Yugoslavia ................ 23 1.6. The founding of parties in the Yugoslav Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1990 ............. 24 1.7. The first multiparty elections in Bosnia-Herzegovina . 36 1.8. Disagreement between the three leading parties over the future organization of Yugoslavia and Bosnia- Herzegovina in 1991 ...................... 38 1.9. The rebellion by members of the SDA and the HDZ in the republican government against the SFRY and pressures on the Serb people in Bosnia-Herzegovina (1 991 -1 992) ............................. 3": 1.10 . The emergence of new states in the territory of the former Yugoslav republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina . 72 1.1 1. The establishment of the Bosnian Serb Republic . 73 1.12. The establishment of the so-called Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina ....................... 77 1.13 . The establishment of Herzeg-Bosnia ........... 82 1.14 . The establishment of the Autonomous Province of Western Bosnia ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tendencies Related to the Production of Raspberries in the Republic of Serbia
    TENDENCIES RELATED TO THE PRODUCTION OF RASPBERRIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Original scientific paper Economics of Agriculture 1/2013 UDC: 634.711(497.11) TENDENCIES RELATED TO THE PRODUCTION OF RASPBERRIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Nataša Kljajić1, Predrag Vuković2, Slavica Arsić3 Summary Raspberry for its biological characteristics, economic importance, agro-ecological, technological, organizational and other requirements, the market value of the product, as well as very high interdependence and interdependence between the various phases of reproductive cycle, specific fruit species. He is one of the most important types of berries in the world, and is one of the most profitable crops in the overall crop production. By production volume, Serbia is among the leading producers of raspberries, and its economic significance is very high level of market sells and market competitiveness of the European Union. Accordingly, the paper presents the production season in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2000-2010 its average, minimum and maximum of values in production, changes in rates and coefficients of variation. Key words: raspberry, production, economic importance. JEL: Q13, Q11 Introduction The most significant production for the economy of our country within fruit production is the production of berrylike fruit (strawberries, raspberries, blackberries, blueberries, cranberries, gooseberries) since an annual turnover realized with the export of this fruit, and first of all the export of raspberries, is more than 120 million of euros (Kljajic, 2012.). Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) is the most important kind of berry-like fruit. Growing raspberries has a very long tradition in our country, longer than a century.
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Study for Partner Municipalities
    1 INVESTOR: MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC WATERSUPPLY GOVERNANCE P ROJEKAT: STUDIJA U OBLASTI VODOSNABDIJEVANJA ZA PARTNERSKE OPŠTINE P ROJECT: WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR PARTNER MUNICIPALITIES STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BOSANSKI PETROVAC 2011 WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR BOSANSKI PETROVAC MUNICIPALITY Engineering, Design and Consulting Company Bijeljina INVESTOR: UNDP BIH / MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BOSANSKI PETROVAC Projektni tim Odgovornost u projektu Slobodan Tadić Program manager UNDP/MDG-F DEG UNDP BiH Haris Fejzibegović Technical Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG Amel Jakupović Financial Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG Zdravko Stevanović Team Leader Voding 92 doo Vladimir Potparević Technical expert Alen Robović Financial expert Ermin Hajder Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Općina Bosanski Petrovac Merima Kahrić Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Senada Mehdin Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Duško Bosnić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Vodovod i Kanalizacija Huse Jukić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Nadzorni odbor Bosanski Petrovac Jasmin Hamzić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Nebojša Budović Technical expert Andreas Stoisits Technical expert Mirjana Blagovčanin Financial expert Željko Ivanović Financial expert Voding 92 doo Branislav Erić Technical expert Milutin Petrović GIS expert Muzafer Alihodžić GIS expert Bobana Pejčić Translator Željka Ivanović Translator Project Manager: Managing Director: Zdravko Stevanović, civ.eng. Vladimir Potparević, civ.eng. Chapter: Registration 2 WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR BOSANSKI PETROVAC MUNICIPALITY STUDY
    [Show full text]
  • Traveling and Other Useful Information About Krusevac
    XII SYMPOSIUM ON FORAGE CROPS OF REPUBLIC OF SERBIA “Forage crops basis of the sustainable animal husbandry development“ th th May 26 to 28 2010, Kruševac, Serbia INSTITUTE FOR FORAGE FORAGE CROPS SOCIETY OF CROPS SERBIA ABOUT KRUŠEVAC The city of Kruševac is located the central part of the Republic of Serbia. It covers the area of 854km² and includes 101 townships and 145.000 inhabitants in total. The Kruševac urban area has about 65,000 inhabitants. It is located in the valleys of West Morava River, Rasina River, between the Jastrebac, Kopaonik and Željin mountains. The City of Kruševac is the centre of the Rasina District, which includes municipalities Aleksandrovac, Brus, Varvarin, Trstenik and Ćićevac. As a city rich in tradition and centuries of history, once the medieval Serbian capital, Kruševac today is a modern city, economic, administrative, cultural, health, education, information and sports centre of importance for the Rasina District and the Republic of Serbia. INSTITUTE FOR FORAGE CROPS, TRG KOSTURNICE 50, KRUŠEVAC, SERBIA Tel: +381 37 442 583, +381 37 442 590 Fax: +381 37 441 295 Manager: +381 37 423 863 E‐mail: [email protected] www.ikbks.com XII SYMPOSIUM ON FORAGE CROPS OF REPUBLIC OF SERBIA “Forage crops basis of the sustainable animal husbandry development“ th th May 26 to 28 2010, Kruševac, Serbia INSTITUTE FOR FORAGE FORAGE CROPS SOCIETY OF CROPS SERBIA -----History----- The City of Kruševac was founded as the capital city of Serbia by Prince Lazar in the 1371. The name was first mentioned in the 1387 in the decree ordered by Prince Lazar for the regulation of trade agreements with merchants from Dubrovnik.
    [Show full text]
  • Albania Environmental Performance Reviews
    Albania Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review ECE/CEP/183 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS ALBANIA Third Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2018 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 47 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the second Environmental Performance Review of Albania (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 36) in 2012. This volume is issued in English only. Information cut-off date: 16 November 2017. ECE Information Unit Tel.: +41 (0)22 917 44 44 Palais des Nations Fax: +41 (0)22 917 05 05 CH-1211 Geneva 10 Email: [email protected] Switzerland Website: http://www.unece.org ECE/CEP/183 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.: E.18.II.E.20 ISBN: 978-92-1-117167-9 eISBN: 978-92-1-045180-2 ISSN 1020–4563 iii Foreword The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) Environmental Performance Review (EPR) Programme provides assistance to member States by regularly assessing their environmental performance. Countries then take steps to improve their environmental management, integrate environmental considerations into economic sectors, increase the availability of information to the public and promote information exchange with other countries on policies and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Javni Poziv Fmroi 2019 – Konačna Rang Lista Potencijalnih Korisnika Za Rekonstrukciju Stambenih Objekata - Općina Konjic
    JAVNI POZIV FMROI 2019 – KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA ZA REKONSTRUKCIJU STAMBENIH OBJEKATA - OPĆINA KONJIC Adresa sanacije R. br. Prezime i ime Ukupno bodova Sadašnja adresa Ribari Glavatičevo Konjic 1. Faladžić (Bajro) Mujo 150 Ribari Glavatičevo Konjic Kašići Konjic 2. Kašić (Fazla) Vahidin 150 Kašići Konjic Ribari Glavatičevo Konjic 3. Ćišo (Ibro) Halil 140 Ribari Glavatičevo Konjic Kose Glavatičevo Konjic 4. Jazvin (Selim) Salko 140 Kose Glavatičevo Konjic Ribari Konjic 5. Ćišo (Salko) Salko 135 Branilaca Konjica Konjic Orahovica Konjic 6. Bubalo (Mehmed) Edin 130 Orahovica Konjic Vrbići Konjic 7. Azinović (Šćepo) Stoja 130 Vrbići Konjic Zabrđe Konjic 8. Čuljak (Luka) Vido 130 Zabrđe konjic Bijela Konjic 9. Andrić (Slavko) Mladenko 120 Ilićka 10/37 Brčko Distrikt Radešine 52b Konjic 10. Mijić (franjo) Luka 120 Radešine 52b Konjic Ljubuča 5 Konjic 11. Pačariz (Osman) Murat 120 Donje Selo Konjic Kašići Konjic 12. Kašić (Omer) Halil 110 Kašići Konjic Maršala Tita 5 konjic 13. Popović (Anđelko) Ruza 110 Maršala Tita 5 Konjic Orahovica Konjic 14. Petrović (Boško) Pero 100 Orahovica Konjic Kanjina Konjic 15. Azinović (Anka) Petar 100 Kanjina Konjic Boračko Jezero konjic 16. Mićević (Mitar) Milosava 100 Boračko jezero Konjic Napomena: Ukoliko se utvrdi da potencijalni korisnik sa Konačne rang liste ima minimum stambenih uslova, isti će biti isključen iz dalje procedure za dobijanje pomoći. KOMISIJA ZA ODABIR KORISNIKA Sarajevo, 10.06.2020.godine JAVNI POZIV FMROI 2019 – KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA ZA REKONSTRUKCIJU STAMBENIH OBJEKATA OPĆINA ČAPLJINA Adresa sanacije R. br. Prezime i ime Ukupno bodova Sadašnja adresa Domanovići Čapljina 1. Šejtanić (Mujo) Suvad 230 Domanovići Čapljina Opličići Čapljina 2.
    [Show full text]