DOCSLIB.ORG

Decision on Fourth Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IT-95-5/18-T 36374 D36374 - D36243 UNITED 14 June 2010 TR NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Case No.: IT-95-5/18-T Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Date: 14 June 2010 Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge O-Gon Kwon, Presiding Judge Judge Howard Morrison Judge Melville Baird Judge Flavia Lattanzi, Reserve Judge Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Decision of: 14 June 2010 PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARADŽIĆ PUBLIC DECISION ON FOURTH PROSECUTION MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATED FACTS Office of the Prosecutor Mr. Alan Tieger Ms. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff The Accused Standby Counsel Mr. Radovan Karadžić Mr. Richard Harvey 36373 THIS TRIAL CHAMBER of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 (“Tribunal”) is seised of the “Fourth Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 26 August 2009 (“Motion”) and of the Accused’s “Motion for Reconsideration of Decisions on Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 4 March 2010 (“Motion for Reconsideration”), and hereby renders its decision thereon. I. Background and Submissions 1. The Motion represents the fourth instalment of five motions on judicial notice of adjudicated facts filed by the Office of the Prosecutor (“Prosecution”), and, accordingly, is preceded by the “First Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 27 October 2008 (“First Motion”), the “Second Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts and Corrigendum to First Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 17 March 2009 (“Second Motion”), and the “Third Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 7 April 2009 (“Third Motion”). The Prosecution has subsequently filed the “Fifth Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicate Facts” on 15 December 2009 (“Fifth Motion”), with a resubmission of Appendix A, filed 2 February 2010, and a Corrigendum filed on 9 February 2010.1 The Chamber rendered its decisions on the first three adjudicated facts motions, taking judicial notice of 302 out of 337 facts proposed by the Prosecution in its First Motion,2 466 out of 497 facts proposed in the Third Motion,3 and 744 out of 1049 facts proposed in the Second Motion.4 2. In the Motion, the Prosecution requests that the Chamber exercise its power under Rule 94(B) of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure and Evidence (“Rules”) to take judicial notice of facts set out in Appendix A. The Appendix is divided into two sections. The first relates to the Bosnian-Serb institutions and events in Bosnia and Herzegovina (“BiH”) between 1990 and 1992, and the second section deals with events related to the take-over of the municipalities of Banja Luka, Bijeljina, Bosanska Krupa, Bosanski Novi, Bosanski Petrovac, Bratunac, Brčko, Čajnice, Donji Vakuf, Foča, Hadžići, Ilidža, Ilijaš, Kalinovik, Ključ, Kotor Varoš, Novi Grad, 1 Submission of Renumbered Appendix to Fifth Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts, filed 2 February 2010; Corrigendum to Fifth Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts with Appendix A, filed 9 February 2010. 2 Decision on First Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts, 5 June 2009 (“First Decision on Adjudicated Facts”), para. 39. 3 Decision on Third Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts, 9 July 2009 (“Third Decision on Adjudicated Facts”), para. 63. Case No. IT-95-5/18-T 2 14 June 2010 36372 Novo Sarajevo, Pale, Prijedor, Rogatica, Sanski Most, Sokolac, Višegrad, Vlasenica, Vogošća, and Zvornik.5 3. The facts proposed in the Motion have all been previously adjudicated by the Trial and the Appeals Chamber in the case of Prosecutor v. Krajišnik.6 The Prosecution incorporates by reference its submissions in the First Motion and the Second Motion, as well as in the “Prosecution Reply to the ‘Response to First Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts’ and Further Corrigendum to First Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts”, filed on 6 April 2009, regarding the legal requirements to be met before judicial notice can be taken of an adjudicated fact.7 It also submits that the adjudicated facts listed in Appendix A to the Motion meet the requirements set out in the relevant jurisprudence of the Tribunal, and that taking judicial notice of these adjudicated facts will reduce the length of the trial by condensing the process to matters essential to each party’s case; thus, achieving judicial economy while preserving the Accused’s right to a fair, public, and expeditious trial.8 4. Specifically, the Prosecution argues that the facts submitted in Section I of Appendix A to the Motion are relevant to proving the existence of an overarching joint criminal enterprise aimed at permanently removing Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats from Bosnian-Serb claimed territory (“Overarching JCE”). With regard to Section II of Appendix A, the Prosecution submits that the facts are relevant to proving counts 1 and 3–8 of the Third Amended Indictment (“Indictment”), and illustrate a pattern of conduct proving the implementation of the Overarching JCE.9 5. The Chamber recalls that on 22 July 2009, it ordered the Prosecution to prepare a written submission on how Rule 73 bis (D) may be utilised to reduce the size of the trial and ensure that it is conducted fairly and expeditiously.10 The Prosecution filed its submission on 31 August 2009, making a number of proposals, including the reduction of a number of crime sites or incidents alleged in the Indictment.11 Following a discussion on the matter at the Status Conference held on 8 September 2009, the Prosecution filed a second written submission on 18 4 Decision on Second Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts, 9 October 2009 (“Second Decision on Adjudicated Facts”), para. 54. 5 Motion, para. 2. 6 See Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, Judgement, 27 September 2006 (“Krajišnik Trial Judgement”); Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Judgment, 17 March 2009 (“Krajišnik Appeal Judgement”). 7 Motion, para. 4. 8 Motion, para. 4. 9 Motion, para. 2. 10 Order to the Prosecution under Rule 73 bis, 22 July 2009. 11 Prosecution Submission pursuant to Rule 73 bis (D), 31 August 2009 (“First Submission”), Appendix B. Case No. IT-95-5/18-T 3 14 June 2010 36371 September 2009,12 and the Accused filed a written response on 30 September 2009.13 At the Pre-Trial Conference on 6 October 2009, the Chamber delivered its decision on the application of Rule 73 bis, which was followed by a written decision on 8 October 2009.14 The effect of the Decision on Rule 73 bis on the Motion will be discussed in more detail below. 6. On 4 September 2009, the Accused filed his “Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 4th Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts” (“Motion for Extension of Time”), arguing that the sheer volume of the Motion required four months to prepare his response, and therefore requesting an extension of time until 11 January 2010 to do so.15 The Chamber heard from the parties regarding the Motion for Extension of Time during the Status Conference held on 8 September 2009. The Prosecution did not object to the granting of an extension of time in principle, but argued that the amount of time requested was excessive.16 The Accused reiterated his claim that the complexity of the case warranted a longer extension, and submitted that the lack of effective assistance of counsel in the Krajišnik case required a closer look at the facts and more time to respond.17 In an order following the Status Conference, the Chamber instructed the Accused to file his response by 30 November 2009.18 7. On 30 November 2009, the Accused filed his “Response to Fourth Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts” (“Response”) opposing the Motion, and incorporating by reference the arguments raised in his responses to the First Motion, the Second Motion, and the Third Motion.19 As an additional consideration, the Accused submits that, in light of the fact that the Chamber has already taken judicial notice of almost 1600 adjudicated facts, and that the Prosecution had requested the Chamber to admit more than 200 statements and transcripts of prior testimony into evidence pursuant to Rules 92 bis and 92 quater, he “will be so far behind the [P]rosecution at the trial’s opening bell that the trial will proceed with a presumption of guilt”.20 He also argues that the cumulative effect of taking judicial notice of adjudicated facts 12 Prosecution Second Submission pursuant to Rule 73 bis (D), 18 September 2009 (“Second Submission”), para. 2. 13 Response to Prosecution’s Second Rule 73 bis Submission, 30 September 2009. 14 Decision on Application of Rule 73 bis, 8 October 2009 (“Decision on Rule 73 bis”). 15 Motion for Extension of Time, paras. 3–5. 16 Status Conference, T. 439–440 (8 September 2009). 17 Status Conference, T. 440–441 (8 September 2009). 18 Order Following Status Conference, 9 September 2009, p. 2. 19 Response para. 2. See Response to First Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts, 30 March 2009 (“Response to First Motion”); Response to Second Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts, 22 July 2009; Response to Third Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts and Motion for List of Witnesses to be Eliminated, 29 May 2009 (“Response to Third Motion”). 20 Response, para. 1.
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020

    Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020

    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
  • Tuzla Is a City in the Northeastern Part of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It Is the Seat of the Tuzla Canton and Is the Econo

    Tuzla Is a City in the Northeastern Part of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It Is the Seat of the Tuzla Canton and Is the Econo

    Summary: Tuzla is a city in the northeastern part of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is the seat of the Tuzla Canton and is the economic, scientific, cultural, educational, health and tourist centre of northeast Bosnia. Preliminary results from the 2013 Census indicate that the municipality has a population of 120,441. District Heating System of Tuzla City started in October 1983. Project to supply Tuzla City with heat energy from Tuzla Power Plant that will have combined production of electricity and heat was happened in 4 phases. The requirements for connection to Tuzla District Heating brought of system in position that in 2005 we got to the maximum capacity and we had to do wide modernization of network pipes and heat substations. Facts about the Tuzla district energy system Annual heat carrying capacity: 300,000 MWth Temperature: 130–60°C Transmission network length: 19.6 km (2x9.8 km) Distribution network length: 142.4 km (2x71.2 km) Power station fuel: Coal Number of users: Total: 22934 Flats snd Houses: 20979 Public Institutions: 156 Commercial units: 1799 Heated area (square meters): Total: 1718787 Flats and Houses: 1158402 Public Institutions: 220460 Commercial units: 339925 Results achieved by reengineering the Tuzla district energy system • 30 % energy savings compared to old system before retrofit • Capacity expanded by 36 % within the existing flow of 2,300 m3/h • Reengineering of 98 substations: ball valves, strainers, pressure regulators, control valves, temperature and pressure sensors, safety thermostats, weather stations, electronic controllers, thermostatic radiator valves (TRVs), energy meters Tuzla is a city in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is the seat of the Tuzla Canton and is the economic, scientific, cultural, educational, health and tourist centre of northeast Bosnia.
  • Rural-Urban Differences and the Break-Up of Yugoslavia L’Opposition Ville-Campagne Et La Dissolution De La Yougoslavie

    Rural-Urban Differences and the Break-Up of Yugoslavia L’Opposition Ville-Campagne Et La Dissolution De La Yougoslavie

    Balkanologie Revue d'études pluridisciplinaires Vol. VI, n° 1-2 | 2002 Volume VI Numéro 1-2 Rural-urban differences and the break-up of Yugoslavia L’opposition ville-campagne et la dissolution de la Yougoslavie John B. Allcock Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/447 DOI: 10.4000/balkanologie.447 ISSN: 1965-0582 Publisher Association française d'études sur les Balkans (Afebalk) Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2002 Number of pages: 101-125 ISSN: 1279-7952 Electronic reference John B. Allcock, « Rural-urban differences and the break-up of Yugoslavia », Balkanologie [Online], Vol. VI, n° 1-2 | 2002, Online since 04 February 2009, connection on 17 December 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/447 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/balkanologie.447 © Tous droits réservés Balkanologie VI (1-2), décembre 2002, p. 101-125 \ 101 RURAL-URBAN DIFFERENCES AND THE BREAK-UP OF YUGOSLAVIA* John B. Allcock* INTRODUCTION There has been widespread debate over the possible causes of the break­ up of the former Yugoslav federation, encompassing a broad choice of political, economic and cultural factors within the country, as well as aspects of its in­ ternational setting, which might be considered to have undermined the in­ tegrity of the state. Relatively little attention has been paid, however, to the importance of rural-urban differences in the development of these social and political conflicts. I set it out in this paper to remind the reader of the impor­ tance of this dimension of the disintegration of the former Yugoslavia, al­ though within the format of a brief article it is possible to do no more than il­ lustrate a hypothesis which will certainly require more rigorous empirical examination.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    23671 <: *h :? ' November 2001 J SIAED6JMEN PRI ES lNfE OATOF B SNI HER EGOVINA Public Disclosure Authorized INA ANT/ ~* EN4/\ AVB4 /\ TNCIA/ ANTON\/A NT ** T RZNgATN / NT \IAN - 4*N EVANTO Public Disclosure Authorized /.SA E NTON H G N A I \ / \_ *: NtRETVA\ tANTOs/ \ / \ / L / C_l /\\ / \ / \ / 29 K I~E *>tE'\STC+NTzONHx,ERZG/VINA X / \ : I L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized / CzNTOSRvJEV F/I\/E COPY Public Disclosure Authorized CANTONS IN THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA UNA - SANA CANTON No. 1 POSAVINA CANTON No. 2 TUZLA CANTON No. 3 ZENICA - DOBOJ CANTON No. 4 DRINA CANTON No. 5 CENTRAL BOSNIAN CANTON No. 6 NERETVA CANTON No. 7 WEST HERZEGOVINA CANTON No. 8 SARAJEVO CANTON No. 9 HERZEG BOSNIAN CANTON No.10 Authors: Miralem Porobic, lawyer and Senada Havic Design: Tirada, Sarajevo. Chris Miller Free publication November 2001 SEED. Sarajevo. Bosnia and Herzegovina This study was done with an aim to determine the level of the actual costs, which must have each small and medium business company when start their operations in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It contains the defined costs for the business registration itself, and for construction of a facility where the registered activity will be performed. The data published in this study were collected through the survey conducted in all municipalities in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in July 2001. After summarizing all collected data, it was determined that there are few identical forms and approaches to the same category of the costs that a small and medium size business company can have as a precondition for starting its normal work.
  • Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

    Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. YUGOSLAVIA) PKELIMINARY OBJECTIONS JUNE 1995 I TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS .............................. 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 3 FACTS ........................................... 7 1.1. Relevant facts from the past of Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................. 7 1.2. The creation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the status of Muslims in that State . 11 1.3. Genocide committed against the Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Second World War . 12 1.4. The stati~sof Muslims in Bosnia-Herzegovina in post-war socialist Yugoslavia ................ 20 1.5. The first cirisis in inter-ethnic relations in post-war socialist Yugoslavia ................ 23 1.6. The founding of parties in the Yugoslav Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1990 ............. 24 1.7. The first multiparty elections in Bosnia-Herzegovina . 36 1.8. Disagreement between the three leading parties over the future organization of Yugoslavia and Bosnia- Herzegovina in 1991 ...................... 38 1.9. The rebellion by members of the SDA and the HDZ in the republican government against the SFRY and pressures on the Serb people in Bosnia-Herzegovina (1 991 -1 992) ............................. 3": 1.10 . The emergence of new states in the territory of the former Yugoslav republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina . 72 1.1 1. The establishment of the Bosnian Serb Republic . 73 1.12. The establishment of the so-called Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina ....................... 77 1.13 . The establishment of Herzeg-Bosnia ........... 82 1.14 . The establishment of the Autonomous Province of Western Bosnia ......................
  • Prosecutor V Milorad Krnojelac to Trial Chamber II, 17 June 1998

    Prosecutor V Milorad Krnojelac to Trial Chamber II, 17 June 1998

    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-97-25-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Date: 15 March 2002 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia Original: English Since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge David Hunt, Presiding Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Judge Liu Daqun Registrar: Mr Hans Holthuis Judgment of: 15 March 2002 PROSECUTOR v. MILORAD KRNOJELAC JUDGMENT Counsel for the Prosecutor: Ms Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff Ms Peggy Kuo Mr William Smith Counsel for the Accused: Mr Mihajlo Bakrac Mr Miroslav Vasi} 1 Case No: IT-97-25-T 15 March 2002 I. SUMMARY OF THE CHARGES............................................................................. 4 II. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3 AND ARTICLE 5 OF THE STATUTE........................................................................................................... 7 A. Facts relevant to the general requirements of Article 3 and Article 5 of the Statute 7 B. General requirements under Article 3 of the Statute .............................................. 20 C. General requirements under Article 5 of the Statute .............................................. 21 D. Findings in respect of the general requirements of Articles 3 and 5 of the Statute 24 III. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE......................................................................................................... 27 IV. INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUPERIOR RESPONSIBILITY..................................................................................................
  • Z a K O N O Teritorijalnoj Organizaciji Crne Gore

    Z a K O N O Teritorijalnoj Organizaciji Crne Gore

    Na osnovu člana 82 stav 1 ta čka 2 i člana 91 stav 2 Ustava Crne Gore, Skupština Crne Gore 24. saziva, na drugoj śednici drugog redovnog (jesenjeg) zasijedanja u 2011. godini, dana 2. novembra 2011. godine, donijela je Z A K O N O TERITORIJALNOJ ORGANIZACIJI CRNE GORE I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovim zakonom ure đuju se teritorijalna organizacija Crne Gore, uslovi, na čin i postupak teritorijalnog organizovanja i druga pitanja od značaja za teritorijalnu organizaciju. Član 2 Teritorija opštine, Glavnog grada i Prijestonice (u daljem tekstu: jedinice lokalne samouprave) utvr đuje se ovim zakonom. Član 3 Teritorija jedinice lokalne samouprave i naziv opštine mogu se mijenjati u skladu sa ovim zakonom. II. TERITORIJALNA ORGANIZACIJA Član 4 Teritoriju jedinice lokalne samouprave čine naselja. Član 5 Teritorija Glavnog grada Podgorica, sa sjedištem u Podgorici, obuhvata Podgoricu kao naselje gradskog karaktera, naselja: Balo či, Begova Glavica, Bezjovo, Beri, Bigor, Bio če, Blizna, Bolesestra, Brežine, Bri đe, Brskut, Buronje, Crnci, Crvena Paprat, Cvilin, Ćafa, Ćepeti ći, Dajbabe, Dolovi, Doljani, Donja Gorica, Donje Strav če, Donji Kokoti, Draževina, Du čići, Duga, Đurkovi ći, Duške, Farmaci, Fundina, Goljemadi, Gornje Stravče, Gornji Kokoti, Gradac, Grbavci, Grbi Do, Kisjelica, Klopot, Kopilje, Kornet, Kosor, Krusi, Kržanja, Leki ći, Liješnje, Liješta, Lijeva Rijeka, Lopote, Lutovo, Lužnica, Medun, Milati, Mom če, Mrke, Opasanica, Orahovo, Oraovice, Orasi, Ožezi, Parci, Pelev Brijeg, Petrovi ći, Poprat, Prisoja, Progonovi ći, Ra ći, Rade
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912

    Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912

    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
  • Water Supply Study for Partner Municipalities

    Water Supply Study for Partner Municipalities

    1 INVESTOR: MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC WATERSUPPLY GOVERNANCE P ROJEKAT: STUDIJA U OBLASTI VODOSNABDIJEVANJA ZA PARTNERSKE OPŠTINE P ROJECT: WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR PARTNER MUNICIPALITIES STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BOSANSKI PETROVAC 2011 WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR BOSANSKI PETROVAC MUNICIPALITY Engineering, Design and Consulting Company Bijeljina INVESTOR: UNDP BIH / MDG-F DEMOCRATIC ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE STUDY FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BOSANSKI PETROVAC Projektni tim Odgovornost u projektu Slobodan Tadić Program manager UNDP/MDG-F DEG UNDP BiH Haris Fejzibegović Technical Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG Amel Jakupović Financial Coordinator UNDP/MDG-F DEG Zdravko Stevanović Team Leader Voding 92 doo Vladimir Potparević Technical expert Alen Robović Financial expert Ermin Hajder Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Općina Bosanski Petrovac Merima Kahrić Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Senada Mehdin Bosanski Petrovac Municipality Duško Bosnić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Vodovod i Kanalizacija Huse Jukić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Nadzorni odbor Bosanski Petrovac Jasmin Hamzić “ViK” Bosanski Petrovac Nebojša Budović Technical expert Andreas Stoisits Technical expert Mirjana Blagovčanin Financial expert Željko Ivanović Financial expert Voding 92 doo Branislav Erić Technical expert Milutin Petrović GIS expert Muzafer Alihodžić GIS expert Bobana Pejčić Translator Željka Ivanović Translator Project Manager: Managing Director: Zdravko Stevanović, civ.eng. Vladimir Potparević, civ.eng. Chapter: Registration 2 WATER SUPPLY STUDY FOR BOSANSKI PETROVAC MUNICIPALITY STUDY
  • Bosna I Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE

    Bosna I Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE

    Bosna i Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERAL MINISTRY OF HERCEGOVINE FEDERALNO MINISTARSTVO DISPLACED PERSONS AND REFUGEES RASELJENIH OSOBA I IZBJEGLICA Broj: 03-36-2-334-5022/19 Sarajevo, 20.05.2020.godine Na osnovu člana 56. Zakona o organizaciji organa uprave u Federaciji BiH („Službene novine Federacije BiH“ broj: 35/05), a u vezi sa objavljenim Javnim pozivom za program pomoći održivog povratka „Podrška zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u period 2020. i 2021.godine“, broj: 03-36-2-334-1/19 od 09.12.2019. godine, u skladu sa Procedurama za izbor korisnika za „Program podrške zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u periodu 2020. i 2021.godine“, broj: 03-36-2-334-2/19 od 12.12.2019, na prijedlog Komisije za razmatranje prijava po Javnom pozivu, imenovane Rješenjem ministra, broj: 03-36-2-334-3/19 od 12.12.2019.godine, federalni ministar raseljenih osoba i izbjeglica, donosi ODLUKU O UTVRĐIVANJU RANG LISTE POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA za program pomoći održivog povratka „Podrška zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u periodu 2020. i 2021.godine“ za entitet Republika srpska I Ovom odlukom vrši se rangiranje potencijalnih korisnika pomoći na osnovu ispunjavanja/neispunjavanja općih i posebnih kriterija, odnosno ukupnog broja bodova. II Rang lista potencijalnih korisnika pomoći koji ispunjavaju opće kriterije iz Javnog poziva raspoređenih prema opštinama i programima pomoći kako slijedi: Regija Banja Luka Banja Luka- Mehanizacija RB IME /ime oca/ PREZIME ADRESA GRAD/OPĆINA PROGRAM POMOĆI NAMJENA BODOVI Ivanjska Pezić 1 Pezić/Ilija/Mato Banja Luka 1. Mehanizacija Traktor 40-45 KS polje 60 Čelinac- Finansijska sredstva Čelinac Novac-mašine, oprema 1 Nuhić (Selim) Mujo V.Mišića 44 7.
  • MAIN STAFF of the ARMY of REPUBLIKA SRPSKA /VRS/ DT No

    MAIN STAFF of the ARMY of REPUBLIKA SRPSKA /VRS/ DT No

    Translation 00898420 MAIN STAFF OF THE ARMY OF REPUBLIKA SRPSKA /VRS/ DT No. 02/2-15 NATIONAL DEFENCE 31 March 1995 STA TE SECRET SADEJSTVO /coordination/ 95 VERY URGENT To the commands of the 1st KK /Krajina Corps/, IBK /Eastern Bosnia Corps/, DK /Drina Corps/, V /Air Force/ and PVO /Anti-aircraft Defence/ (to the 2nd KK /Krajina Corps/, SRK /Sarajevo-Romanija Corps/ and HK /Herzegovina Corps/, for their information). DIRECTIVE FOR FURTHER OPERATIONS, Operative No. 711 1. BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MILITARY AND POLITICAL SITUATION Since the start of the year, but particularly during the second half of March, Muslim armed forces have started wantonly violating in a synchronised manner the Agreement on a Four-month Cessation of Hostilities, focussing on offensive actions in the wider area of Bihac and Vlasic, in the zone of operations of the 30th Infantry Division and Task Group 2 of the 1st Krajina Corps, and on Majevica mountain, as well as regrouping and bringing in new forces to continue offensive actions in Posavina, towards Teslic and Srbobran. In synchronised activities, forces of the Muslim-Croatian Federation, forces of the HVO /Croatian Defence Council/ and units of the HV /Croatian Army/ are waiting for the result of the struggle on the Vlasic plateau and on Majevica, and in the event of a favourable development of the situation will join in with the aim of cutting the corridor and taking control of the Posavina, continuing operations in the direction of Glamoc and Grahovo, and, in cooperation with Muslim forces, taking Sipovo
  • Bosna I Hercegovina Federacija Bosne I Hercegovine Srednjobosanski Kanton / Kanton Središnja Bosna V L A

    Bosna I Hercegovina Federacija Bosne I Hercegovine Srednjobosanski Kanton / Kanton Središnja Bosna V L A

    BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE SREDNJOBOSANSKI KANTON / KANTON SREDIŠNJA BOSNA V L A D A - Komisija/povjerenstvo za provođenje javnog poziva za prijem osoba/lica za stručno osposobljavanje bez zasnivanja radnog odnosa- Broj:01-34-41/2019-486 Datum:31.1.2020. Komisija/povjerenstvo za prijem lica/osoba za stručno osposobljavanje bez zasnivanja radnog odnosa imenovana rješenjem Vlade SBK broj 01-34-132/20149-3 od 6.12.2019. godine razmotrila je prijave za javni poziv za prijem osoba/lica za stručno osposobljavanje bez zasnivanja radnog odnosa u kantonalne organe/tijela uprave te je utvrdila sljedeću listu kandidata koji ispunjavaju uvjete kako slijedi: R.br. Prezime i ime Općina Stručno zvanje 1 CETIN(HAMID)AMILA BUGOJNO MA.PREHRAMBENE TEHN. 2 JOLDIĆ(IBRAHIM)AMRA BUGOJNO BA.MENADŽMENTA 3 MURATSPAHIĆ (SENAD) ADNANA BUGOJNO BA.PROF.PEDAGOGIJE 4 KERO(ĐEVAD)ADELA BUGOJNO EKONOMIST-MENADŽER 5 MEŠAN (EMIN) MELIHA BUGOJNO MA.LAB. TEHNOL. 6 OMERAGIĆ (RESUL) ALMIRA BUGOJNO DIPL. EKONOMISTA 7 BUŠATLIĆ (EKREM) MIRZA BUGOJNO MA. BOSANSKOG JEZIKA 8 ĆOSOVIĆ(MUNEVER)ANELA BUGOJNO MA.KOMUNIKOLOGIJE 9 DELIĆ(ZIJAD)AMER BUGOJNO BA.ING.ELEKTROTEHNIKE 10 KUKIĆ(NEZIR)AMNA BUGOJNO BA.BIOLOGIJE, BIOHEMIJA I FIZIOLOGIJA 11 HASKIĆ(ADEM)AJLA BUGOJNO BA.INFORMACIONIH TEHNOLOGIJA 12 ČATIĆ(ARIF)MIRNESA BUGOJNO BA.ING.SAOBRAĆAJA 13 JUSUFSPAHIĆ(AHMET)FUAD BUGOJNO BA.ING.GEOLOGIJE 14 ALISPAHIĆ (HARIS) AZRA BUGOJNO BA. FIZIK.TERAPIJE 15 VELAGIĆ (ISMET) ADNAN BUGOJNO MA. ŠUMARSTVA 16 TEKEŠIĆ (FUAD) DALILA BUGOJNO PROF. BOS.JEZ. I KNJIŽ. 17 MUSIĆ (JASMIN) IRMA BUGOJNO MA. HEMIJE 18 HODŽIĆ (SANEL) AMILA BUGOJNO MA.ŽURNALISTIKE 19 SULTANOVIĆ(SABIT)FATIMA BUGOJNO MA.BIOLOGIJE-BIOHEMIJA I FIZIOLOGIJA 20 SEFEROVIĆ(NESIM)IRHAD BUGOJNO MA.BILJNE PROIZVODNJE 21 MILANOVIĆ (NEDŽAD) SENAD BUGOJNO DIPL.DRAMSKI AUDIO-VIZUELNI GLUMAC 22 ŠLJIVO (JUNUZ) ADISA BUGOJNO MA.