06-15 Gov Transactiondetail with Notes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2014 Legislature - Operating Budget Transaction Detail - Governor Structure 06-15GIncDecF Column Numbers and Language Agency: Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Trans Total Personal Capital ________ Type ____________ Expenditure ____________ Services ____________ Travel ____________ Services ____________ Commodities ____________ Outlay ____________ Grants ____________ Misc _____ PFT _____ PPT _____ TMP Administration and Support Advisory Boards FY2006 Ch. 18, SLA 2005 (SB 133) Aviation Advisory Board FisNot 20.0 0.0 16.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 20.0 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ * Allocation Total * 20.0 0.0 16.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Commissioner's Office FY2006 Ch. 53, SLA 2005 (HB 98) Nonunion Public Employee FisNot 57.6 57.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Salary and Benefit 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 18.0 1027 IntAirport (Other) 6.3 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) 19.1 1076 Marine Hwy (DGF) 13.0 1156 Rcpt Svcs (DGF) 1.2 FY2006 Ch. 53, SLA 2005 (HB 98) Commissioner increase FisNot 35.1 35.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 35.1 FY2008 PERS adjustment of unrealizable receipts Dec -58.2 -58.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) -18.2 1076 Marine Hwy (DGF) -36.6 1156 Rcpt Svcs (DGF) -3.4 FY2009 AMD: Correct Unrealizable Fund Sources for Salary FndChg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Adjustments: Exempt The ICAP(CIP) to GF fund source change is needed because the department has been bumping up against the maximum amount of costs that can be recovered through the indirect cost allocation plan. Less ICAP revenues are expected for these overhead costs as construction expenditures diminish. Through January our billed FHWA revenues are 7% lower than this time last year. The construction program is suffering already and we are doing less because of it. The AMHS to GF fund source change is needed because insufficient AMHS revenues are being collected to support any increased costs. 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 27.0 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) -8.8 1076 Marine Hwy (DGF) -18.2 FY2011 Budget Clarification Project - Rural Airport Leasing FndChg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Revenue 1005 GF/Prgm (DGF) 25.4 1156 Rcpt Svcs (DGF) -25.4 FY2011 Reduce general fund travel line item by 10 percent. Dec -10.4 0.0 -10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) -7.5 1005 GF/Prgm (DGF) -0.2 1076 Marine Hwy (DGF) -2.7 FY2011 Ch. 56, SLA 2010 (HB 421) FY 2011 Noncovered FisNot 18.5 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Employees Salary Increase FY2011 Noncovered Employees Year 1 increase : $18.5 2014-01-14 16:52:41 Legislative Finance Division Page: 1 2014 Legislature - Operating Budget Transaction Detail - Governor Structure 06-15GIncDecF Column Numbers and Language Agency: Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Trans Total Personal Capital ________ Type ____________ Expenditure ____________ Services ____________ Travel ____________ Services ____________ Commodities ____________ Outlay ____________ Grants ____________ Misc _____ PFT _____ PPT _____ TMP Administration and Support (continued) Commissioner's Office (continued) FY2011 Ch. 56, SLA 2010 (HB 421) FY 2011 Noncovered Employees Salary Increase (continued) 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 6.4 1007 I/A Rcpts (Other) 2.5 1026 HwyCapital (Other) 0.8 1027 IntAirport (Other) 2.5 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) 2.1 1076 Marine Hwy (DGF) 3.8 1156 Rcpt Svcs (DGF) 0.4 FY2011 Ch. 56, SLA 2010 (HB 421) LFD: Correct funding for FisNot 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 FY 2011 Noncovered Employees Salary Increase 1005 GF/Prgm (DGF) 0.4 1156 Rcpt Svcs (DGF) -0.4 L FY2012 FY12 National Forest Receipts from DCCED Lang 170.0 0.0 0.0 170.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1002 Fed Rcpts (Fed) 170.0 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ * Allocation Total * 212.6 53.0 -10.4 170.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Contracting and Appeals FY2006 Add ICAP to fully fund Design-Build Engineer Inc 63.0 57.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 A Procurement Specialist IV Range 20 was reclassified to a Technical Engineer II / Architect II Range 24. ICAP funding will be used to cover the additional cost of salary and travel. Additional personal services funds will also help reduce the vacancy factor in this very small component that experiences little or no turnover. 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) 63.0 FY2008 AMD: Fund source adjustment for market-based pay FndChg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 increases Fund source change to correct unrealizeable fund sources. 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 7.5 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) -7.5 FY2008 AMD: Reclassify Procurement Specialist position Dec -20.4 -20.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 A Procurement Specialist III position will be reclassified to a Procurement Specialist II. Due to the reorganization of this unit, this reclassification will have no impact on the service delivery of the unit. 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) -20.4 FY2008 PERS adjustment of unrealizable receipts Dec -114.9 -114.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1007 I/A Rcpts (Other) -2.3 1026 HwyCapital (Other) -6.2 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) -30.9 1076 Marine Hwy (DGF) -75.5 FY2009 AMD: Correct Unrealizable Fund Sources for Salary FndChg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Adjustments: SU The ICAP to GF fund source changes are needed because the department has been bumping up against the maximum amount of costs that can be recovered through the indirect cost allocation plan. Less ICAP revenues are expected for these overhead costs as construction expenditures diminish. Through January our billed FHWA 2014-01-14 16:52:41 Legislative Finance Division Page: 2 2014 Legislature - Operating Budget Transaction Detail - Governor Structure 06-15GIncDecF Column Numbers and Language Agency: Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Trans Total Personal Capital ________ Type ____________ Expenditure ____________ Services ____________ Travel ____________ Services ____________ Commodities ____________ Outlay ____________ Grants ____________ Misc _____ PFT _____ PPT _____ TMP Administration and Support (continued) Contracting and Appeals (continued) FY2009 AMD: Correct Unrealizable Fund Sources for Salary Adjustments: SU (continued) revenues are 7% lower than this time last year. The construction program is suffering already and we are doing less because of it. 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 9.5 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) -9.5 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ * Allocation Total * -72.3 -78.3 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Equal Employment and Civil Rights FY2008 PERS adjustment of unrealizable receipts Dec -52.5 -52.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) -52.5 FY2009 Correct Unrealizable Fund Sources for Salary FndChg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Adjustments: GGU 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 17.4 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) -17.4 FY2009 Increase funding to bring component within allowable Inc 15.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 vacancy factor EE/Civil Rights is a small component with low turnover. Increased funding is needed to bring the component within the allowable vacancy factor. 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) 15.0 FY2009 AMD: Correct Unrealizable Fund Sources for Salary FndChg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Adjustments: SU The ICAP to GF fund source changes are needed because the department has been bumping up against the maximum amount of costs that can be recovered through the indirect cost allocation plan. Less ICAP revenues are expected for these overhead costs as construction expenditures diminish. Through January our billed FHWA revenues are 7% lower than this time last year. The construction program is suffering already and we are doing less because of it. 1004 Gen Fund (UGF) 12.9 1061 CIP Rcpts (Other) -12.9 FY2010 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Certification and Inc 8.7 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 On-Site Title VI Reviews A disparity study was completed in June 2008. The study identified and characterized the extent to which Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) participate in the procurement of Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF) federally assisted highway/airports/transit contracts in general construction services, professional services, supplies, and manufactured items. It also determined if DBE participation is representative of the availability of DBEs that are ready, willing and able to participate in federally assisted DOT&PF contracts. The study was required by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for all States within the 9th Circuit.