List of Airports by IATA Code: a Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia List of Airports by IATA Code: a from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Profil Edisi April
Visi Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Udara “Terwujudnya PenyelenggaraanTransportasi Udara yang Andal, Berdaya Saing dan Memberikan Nilai Tambah” Andal : aman, selamat, nyaman, tepat waktu, terpelihara, mencukupi kebutuhan, jangkauan, mendukung pembangunan nasional. Berdaya saing : efisien, harga terjangkau, ramah lingkungan, berkelanjutan, SDM yang profesional, mandiri dan produktif. Nilai tambah : kontribusi terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional serta penciptaan lapangan kerja. Profil DJU April 2016 1 Misi Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Udara Memenuhi standar keamanan, keselamatan penerbangan dan pelayanan; Menyediakan sarana, prasarana dan jaringan transportasi udara yang andal, optimal dan terintegrasi; Mewujudkan iklim usaha bidang transportasi udara yang kompetitif dan berkelanjutan (sustainable); Mewujudkan kelembagaan yang efektif, efisien didukung oleh SDM yang profesional dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang komprehensif serta menjamin kepastian hukum. Profil DJU April 2016 2 Road Map to Zero Accident SAFETY SECURITY Menumbuhkan kepercayaan SERVICES masyarakat COMPLIANCE TUJUAN menuju ZERO ACCIDENT Kesenjangan 9 Rekomendasi EKKT REGULATOR, OPERATOR, MASYARAKAT Profil DJU April 2016 3 Matriks Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU) Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Udara Tahun 2015-2019 TARGET KUMULATIF SASARAN IKU DITJEN SATUAN /TIAP KETERANGAN STRATEGIS (SS) HUBUD 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TAHUN a. Menurunnya angka 1) Jumlah pedoman Dokumen 13 11 11 12 13 Tiap Tahun Capaian di tahun 2014 (baseline) adalah 2. kecelakaan standar Sehingga -
Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020. -
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET and AUDIT COMMITTEE Division of Legislative Audit
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE Division of Legislative Audit P.O. Box 113300 Juneau, AK 99811-3300 (907) 465-3830 FAX (907) 465-2347 [email protected] SUMMARY OF: A Special Report on the Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Spill Prevention and Response, Oil and Hazardous Substance Release Prevention and Response Fund, March 18, 2008. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT In accordance with Title 24 of the Alaska Statutes and a special request by the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee, we have conducted a performance audit of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Division of Spill Prevention and Response (Division). Specifically, we were asked to review the expenditures and cost recovery revenues from the Oil and Hazardous Substance Release Prevention and Response Fund (Fund). REPORT CONCLUSIONS The conclusions are as follows: all expenditures are not recorded according to activities compliance with statutory cost recovery requirements is unclear Division is not efficiently and effectively recovering costs most expenditures were appropriate legal costs need an improved budgeting process certain contractual oversight practices are weak detailed information on the Fund’s financial activities is incomplete During the audit we reviewed a $9 million reimbursable services agreement between the Division and the Department of Law for legal services related to two transit pipeline spills on the North Slope. The contract was funded by the Response Account without specific legislative appropriation. It would have been more prudent to follow the established legislative budget process, especially for long-term legal activities. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Division Director should improve the accountability for the Division’s activities and reporting of Fund expenditures. -
Intertie Options for Selected AVEC Villages
Intertie Options for Selected AVEC Villages Prepared by consultants and staff of Alaska Village Electric Cooperative August 2014 Intertie Report for Denali Commission Page | i Table of Contents Credits ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Prologue .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Economies of Scale .............................................................................................................................. 5 What do Rural Alaska Interties Look Like? ............................................................................................ 6 Methods and Assumptions ...................................................................................................................... 7 Replacement ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Inflation ............................................................................................................................................... 8 N-1 Criteria .......................................................................................................................................... 9 AVEC -
TABLE of CONTENTS Page
Alaska Aviation System Plan Update Yukon-Kuskokwim Region Air Versus Roads Access Construction and Maintenance Baseline Cost Comparison January 2013 YUKON-KUSKOKWIM REGION AIR VERSUS ROADS ACCESS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE BASELINE COST COMPARISON ALASKA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Division of Statewide Aviation 4111 Aviation Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Prepared by: DOWL HKM 4041 B Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 562-2000 W.O. 59825.10 January 2013 Yukon-Kuskokwim Region Air Versus Roads Access Alaska Aviation System Plan Update Construction and Maintenance Baseline Cost Comparison January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 2.0 ROADS COST ESTIMATE ................................................................................................4 2.1 Design Criteria ..................................................................................................................5 2.2 Roadway Unit Costs and Assumptions .............................................................................6 2.2.1 Roadway Unit Costs ...................................................................................................6 2.2.2 Roadway Cost Assumptions .......................................................................................7 2.2.3 Drainage Unit Costs and Assumptions .......................................................................8 -
Invitation to Bid Invitation Number 2519H037
INVITATION TO BID INVITATION NUMBER 2519H037 RETURN THIS BID TO THE ISSUING OFFICE AT: Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Statewide Contracting & Procurement P.O. Box 112500 (3132 Channel Drive, Suite 350) Juneau, Alaska 99811-2500 THIS IS NOT AN ORDER DATE ITB ISSUED: January 24, 2019 ITB TITLE: De-icing Chemicals SEALED BIDS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE STATEWIDE CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT OFFICE AND MUST BE TIME AND DATE STAMPED BY THE PURCHASING SECTION PRIOR TO 2:00 PM (ALASKA TIME) ON FEBRUARY 14, 2019 AT WHICH TIME THEY WILL BE PUBLICLY OPENED. DELIVERY LOCATION: See the “Bid Schedule” DELIVERY DATE: See the “Bid Schedule” F.O.B. POINT: FINAL DESTINATION IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you received this solicitation from the State’s “Online Public Notice” web site, you must register with the Procurement Officer listed on this document to receive subsequent amendments. Failure to contact the Procurement Officer may result in the rejection of your offer. BIDDER'S NOTICE: By signature on this form, the bidder certifies that: (1) the bidder has a valid Alaska business license, or will obtain one prior to award of any contract resulting from this ITB. If the bidder possesses a valid Alaska business license, the license number must be written below or one of the following forms of evidence must be submitted with the bid: • a canceled check for the business license fee; • a copy of the business license application with a receipt date stamp from the State's business license office; • a receipt from the State’s business license office for -
Cassation Court: “Anapa” Airport” OJSC Unlawfully Refused to Provide Possibility to “Aeroflot – Russian Airlines” OJ
Cassation Court: “Anapa” Airport” OJSC unlawfully refused to provide possibility to “Aeroflot – Russian Airlines” OJSC for delivering its own fuel in Vityazevo airport 16 августа 2010, 17:31 On 10th August 2010, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the claim of “Anapa” Airport” OJSC and confirmed validity of the decision made by the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS Russia). On 24th June 2009, FAS Russia found that “Anapa” Airport” OJSC violated Part 1 Article 10 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” (abusing market dominance). FAS did not issue a determination because the company terminated its activities for providing fuel to aircrafts. “Anapa” Airport” OJSC violated the law by refusing to provide “Aeroflot – Russian Airlines” OJSC possibility to deliver its own fuel in Anapa airport (Vityazevo), which resulted or could have resulted in infringing the interests of “Aeroflot – Russian Airlines” OJSC and restricting competition on the market of air transportation. Courts confirming legitimacy of the FAS Russia’s decisions on ensuring access to airport services and infrastructure show development of the necessary law-enforcement practice on the issues of providing access to airport services. FAS Russia fined the company 400,000 Rubles. The fine is being challenged at court. “Such actions of the airport restricted competition by preventing entry of “Aeroflot – Russian Airlines” OJSC to the market of aviation fuel and services for supplying aviation fuel”, says Dmitry Routenberg, the Head of the FAS Russia’s Department for Control over Transport and Communications. “This is yet another case in the series of cases against airports considered by FAS Russia. -
Chapter 3 Aircraft Accident and Serious Incident Investigations
Chapter 3 Aircraft accident and serious incident investigations Chapter 3 Aircraft accident and serious incident investigations 1 Aircraft accidents and serious incidents to be investigated <Aircraft accidents to be investigated> ◎Paragraph 1, Article 2 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (Definition of aircraft accident) The term "Aircraft Accident" as used in this Act shall mean the accident listed in each of the items in paragraph 1 of Article 76 of the Civil Aeronautics Act. ◎Paragraph 1, Article 76 of the Civil Aeronautics Act (Obligation to report) 1 Crash, collision or fire of aircraft; 2 Injury or death of any person, or destruction of any object caused by aircraft; 3 Death (except those specified in Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) or disappearance of any person on board the aircraft; 4 Contact with other aircraft; and 5 Other accidents relating to aircraft specified in Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. ◎Article 165-3 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Civil Aeronautics Act (Accidents related to aircraft prescribed in the Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under item 5 of the paragraph1 of the Article 76 of the Act) The cases (excluding cases where the repair of a subject aircraft does not correspond to the major repair work) where navigating aircraft is damaged (except the sole damage of engine, cowling, engine accessory, propeller, wing tip, antenna, tire, brake or fairing). <Aircraft serious incidents to be investigated> ◎Item 2, Paragraph 2, Article 2 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (Definition of aircraft serious incident) A situation where a pilot in command of an aircraft during flight recognized a risk of collision or contact with any other aircraft, or any other situations prescribed by the Ordinances of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under Article 76-2 of the Civil Aeronautics Act. -
Subject of the Russian Federation)
How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country. -
DOTPF Alaskan Airports, AIP, APEB
Northern Region Airport Overview -------------------------------------------- DOT&PF Town Hall Meeting October 22, 2010 Jeff Roach, Aviation Planner Northern Region, DOT&PF Topics • Northern Region Airports • Northern Region Aviation Sections • Aviation Funding • Types of Projects • Anticipated Future Funding Levels • Anticipated Northern Region Projects Northern Region 105 Airports 40% of the State’s airports are in the Northern Region • One International Airport • Seaplane Bases • Community Airports • Public, Locally Owned Airports Northern Region Aviation Organization • Planning • Design • Construction • Airport Leasing • Maintenance and Operations (M&O) Aviation Planning • Identify project needs, develops project packages for APEB scoring • Develop project scopes • Conduct airport master plans Project Needs Identification Rural Airports Needs List Development Project needs collected from: • Public, aviation interests, community representatives, DOT&PF and FAA staff, Legislature • DOT&PF Staff (Design, M&O, Leasing) • Needs identified in airport master plans • Regional transportation plans Project Scoping: DOT&PF Regional staff evaluate potential projects to develop preliminary project scope, cost estimate and other supporting information for APEB project evaluation State AIP Project Scoring (APEB) Aviation Project Evaluation Board (APEB): • The APEB is a six-member airport capital project review and evaluation group composed of DOT&PF’s Deputy Commissioner, three Regional Directors (SE, CR, NR), Statewide Planning Director, and State -
The Lippisch Letter
The Lippisch Letter August 2007 Experimental Aircraft Association Chapter 33 A monthly publication of the Dr. Alexander M. Lippisch AirVenture Cup Air Race 2007 Chapter of the Experimental By Greg Zimmerman Aircraft Association, Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The Airventure cup race is the world’s largest Cross Country air race. Last year Harry Hinkley raced 301E to a third place finish in Editor: David Koelzer the Sport class, at 278.53 MPH. He was only 6 seconds off the 2nd EAA Chapter 33 Officers place plane which was also a Swearingen SX300. This Year I was able to race, with Harry being the Co-Pilot. President: Randy Hartman 319-365-9775 We arrived in Dayton just before Noon on Saturday the 21st. We [email protected] checked in, got our Race credentials, met with some old friends and Vice President: TomCaruthers looked over the competition. This year the planes to beat were one 319-895-6989 Nemesis NXT, several Lancair Legacy’s and Glassair III’s, along [email protected] with the usual Swearingen competition. That night we had a nice banquet at the Engineers Club, a few beverages and then off to Secretary & Newsletter Editor: bed. David Koelzer 319-373-3257 [email protected] Sunday morning we were at the field early for last minute speed tweaks, wax job etc. There was much good natured ribbing with the Treasurer: Thomas Meeker other Racers about running this year with the gear down, flying the 319-899-0037 [email protected] Flight Advisors: Dave Lammers 319-377-1425 Technical Counselors: Tom Olson 319-393-5531 Ron White 319-393-6484 Marv Hoppenworth 396-6283 Young Eagles: John Anderson 319-362-6159 Connie White 319-393-6484 Board of Directors: Todd Millard Tom Olson Alan Kritzman www.eaa33.org EAA Chapter 33 1 The Lippisch Letter race at 18,000 feet etc. -
ANSI/ASHRAE Addendum a to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169-2013 Climatic Data for Building Design Standards
ANSI/ASHRAE Addendum a to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169-2013 Climatic Data for Building Design Standards Approved by ASHRAE and the American National Standards Institute on July 31, 2020. This addendum was approved by a Standing Standard Project Committee (SSPC) for which the Standards Committee has established a documented program for regular publication of addenda or revisions, including procedures for timely, docu- mented, consensus action on requests for change to any part of the standard. Instructions for how to submit a change can be found on the ASHRAE® website (https://www.ashrae.org/continuous-maintenance). The latest edition of an ASHRAE Standard may be purchased on the ASHRAE website (www.ashrae.org) or from ASHRAE Customer Service, 180 Technology Parkway NW, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092. E-mail: [email protected]. Fax: 678-539-2129. Telephone: 404-636-8400 (worldwide), or toll free 1-800-527-4723 (for orders in US and Canada). For reprint permission, go to www.ashrae.org/permissions. © 2020 ASHRAE ISSN 1041-2336 ASHRAE Standing Standard Project Committee 169 Cognizant TC: 4.2, Climate Information SPLS Liaison: Walter Grondzik Drury B. Crawley*, Chair Evyatar Erell Didier J. Thevenard* Joshua New*, Vice-Chair Jack N. Lott Russell Vose* Parag Rastogi*, Secretary Robert J. Morris Justin Wong Riad G. Assaf* Michael Roth* * Denotes members of voting status when the document was approved for publication ASHRAE STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2020–2021 Drury B. Crawley, Chair Srinivas Katipamula David Robin Rick M. Heiden, Vice Chair Gerald J. Kettler Lawrence J. Schoen Els Baert Essam E. Khalil Steven C. Sill Charles S. Barnaby Malcolm D.