DOCSLIB.ORG

Harrogate SHELAA Alternative Sites Landscape and Visual Advice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harrogate SHELAA Alternative Sites Landscape and Visual Advice Harrogate SHELAA Alternative Sites Landscape and Visual Advice Draft Report Prepared by LUC September 2018 Project Title: Harrogate SHELAA Alternative Sites Landscape and Visual Advice Client: Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by V1 05.10.18 Draft Jacqueline Jacqueline Melissa Whitworth- Whitworth- Kurihara Allan Allan Chris Cox V2 09.10.18 Final Jacqueline Jacqueline Melissa Whitworth- Whitworth- Kurihara Allan Allan Chris Cox V3 24.10.18 Final Jacqueline Jacqueline Melissa Whitworth- Whitworth- Kurihara Allan Allan Chris Cox Harrogate SHELAA Alternative Sites Landscape and Visual Advice Final Report Prepared by LUC October 2018 Planning & EIA Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design LUC MANCHESTER Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning 2 Mount Street Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management Manchester Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology M2 5WQ Lancaster London NW1 1JD FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper GIS & Visualisation +44 (0)161 3026640 London [email protected] Contents Executive Summary Background and approach Findings 1 Introduction 1 Project Brief 1 Structure of Report 1 2 Context 2 Location 2 Landscape Designations 3 Existing Character Assessments 4 Natural Factors 4 Historical evolution of settlement 4 3 Landscape and Visual review 6 4 Summary 90 Landscape sensitivities 90 Visual analysis 91 Tables Table 3.1 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site B12 (Boroughbridge) 7 Table 3.2 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site B21 (Boroughbridge) 8 Table 3.3 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site BK2 (Beckwith) 9 Table 3.4 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site CA4 (Cattal) 10 Table 3.5 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site CA5 (Cattal) 11 Table 3.6 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site DF7 (RAF Dishforth) 12 Table 3.7 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site FX1 (Flaxby) 13 Table 3.8 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site FX2 (Flaxby) 14 Table 3.9 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site FX3 (Flaxby) 15 Table 3.10 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site GH8 (Great Hammerton) 17 Table 3.11 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site GH11 (Great Hammerton) 18 Table 3.12 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site GH12 (Great Hammerton) 20 Table 3.13 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H1 (Harrogate) 22 Table 3.14 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H8 (Harrogate) 23 Table 3.15 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H9 (Harrogate) 24 Table 3.16 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H10 (Harrogate) 25 Table 3.17 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H11 (Harrogate) 26 Table 3.18 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H24 (Harrogate) 27 Table 3.19 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H31 (Harrogate) 28 Table 3.20 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H32 (Harrogate) 29 Table 3.21 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H34 (Harrogate) 30 Table 3.22 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H39 (Harrogate) 31 Table 3.23 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H49 (Harrogate) 32 Table 3.24 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H51 (Harrogate) 33 Table 3.25 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H52 (Harrogate) 34 Table 3.26 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H58 (Harrogate) 36 Table 3.27 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H66 (Harrogate) 38 Table 3.28 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H70 (Harrogate) 40 Table 3.29 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H73 (Harrogate) 41 Table 3.30 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H86 (Harrogate) 42 Table 3.31 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site HB1 (Huby) 43 Table 3.32 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site HP7 (Hopperton) 44 Table 3.33 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K20 (Knaresborough) 45 Table 3.34 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K25 (Knaresborough) 46 Table 3.35 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K27 (Knaresborough) 47 Table 3.36 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K28 (Knaresborough) 48 Table 3.37 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site KB4 (Kirby Hill) 50 Table 3.38 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site KB5 (Kirby Hill) 51 Table 3.39 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site KH6 (Kirk Hammerton) 53 Table 3.40 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site KH7 (Kirk Hammerton) 54 Table 3.41 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site KL5 (Killinghall) 55 Table 3.42 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site KL15 (Killinghall) 56 Table 3.43 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site LM4 (Long Marston) 57 Table 3.44 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site OC2 (Rudding Farm) 58 Table 3.45 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site OC4 (North of Racecourse Approach) 59 Table 3.46 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site OC5 (Deighton Grange Farm) 60 Table 3.47 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site OC6 (Former Middleton Hospital) 61 Table 3.48 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site OC8 62 Table 3.49 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site OC11 (Near South Stainley) 63 Table 3.50 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site PN2 (Pannal) 64 Table 3.51 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site PN13 (Pannal) 65 Table 3.52 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site PN14 (Pannal) 67 Table 3.53 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site R4 (Ripon) 69 Table 3.55 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site R13 (Ripon) 70 Table 3.56 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site R17 (Ripon) 71 Table 3.57 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site R19 (Ripon) 72 Table 3.58 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site R24 (Ripon) 73 Table 3.59 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site R25 (Ripon) 74 Table 3.60 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site SH3 (Sharow) 75 Table 3.61 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site TW8 (Tockwith) 76 Table 3.62 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site TW11 (Tockwith) 77 Table 3.63 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site WB1 (Wetherby) 78 Table 3.64 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site WB3 (Wetherby) 79 Table 3.65 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H60 (Claro Road depot, Harrogate) 80 Table 3.66 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H67 (Oak View Farm, Harrogate) 81 Table 3.67 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K14 (Trelleborg Factory, Halfpenny Lane) 83 Table 3.68 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K30 (York Place Car Park, Knaresborough) 84 Table 3.69 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K33 (Thistle Hill, Knaresborough) 85 Table 3.70 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K34 (Land to the east of St James Business Park, Knaresborough) 86 Table 3.71 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site K35 (Land adjacent to roundabout at B6164 and A658, Knaresborough) 87 Table 3.72 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H16 (Hookstone Road, Harrogate) 88 Table 3.73 Landscape and Visual appraisal of Site H28 (A661 Wetherby Road) 89 Executive Summary Background and approach LUC have been appointed by Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council to provide landscape and visual analysis on specific housing and employment sites (73 in total) identified within the Harrogate District Council SHELAA. This incorporates the main towns of Harrogate, Ripon, Knaresborough, Boroughbridge, Pateley Bridge and Masham. The Parish Council are also being supported and advised by Arrowsmith Associates in their objection to the emerging Harrogate District Local Plan. This assessment is set in the context of national and local planning policy and describes the potential landscape and visual effects for all housing sites over 10ha and a select list of employment sites. Sites with planning permissions in place have been excluded from this study. This assessment, which included a desktop and fieldwork review, is helpful in understanding the landscape and visual sensitivities of each allocation site. Findings Landscape Designations LUC’s analysis indicated that existing developed sites are less sensitive to re-development in landscape and visual terms unless the re-development has the potential to harm the local distinctiveness of the settlement area. Sites located within close proximity to the Nidderdale AONB require further consideration to determine if development in these locations is appropriate and if it detracts from the significance of the landscape setting given this is afforded the highest value of landscape protection. LUC’s analysis indicated that 16 allocation sites are located partly or wholly within an SLA boundary, a designation for highlighting distinctive and high quality landscapes. Development in these locations is not precluded but must ensure significant features are not lost and that development proposals are linked to existing settlements. Eight of these sites are located within a single SLA (C9d. Crimple Valley) with four of these sites located on adjacent land parcels to the east of Pannal. Development across all of these sites would significantly alter the landscape quality and local distinctiveness of the SLA in this area and encourage coalescence of Pannal with the southern extent of Harrogate. 13 allocation sites are located partly or wholly within the Green Belt Boundary. Environmental LUC’s analysis indicates that two of the allocation sites contain a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC). No other allocation sites are located on the footprint of an environmental designation however the importance of existing established vegetation within the site allocations should be recognised. Cultural Listed Buildings located throughout the district which are highly likely to be influenced by allocation sites which are within close proximity of their setting. A number of site allocations are also within close proximity to Conservation areas. Visual It is important that proposed development is not isolated from existing settlement patterns. Highly sensitive receptors tend to include residential occupiers with unobstructed views from the front of properties, park/recreation users, PRoW users and visitors to churches and cemeteries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Netherlands, Fleet Lane, York, YO26 7QE £695,000 Netherlands, Fleet Lane, York £695,000
    Netherlands, Fleet Lane, York, YO26 7QE £695,000 Netherlands, Fleet Lane, York £695,000 *A substantial period family home * Original period features * Scope to extend * Excellent for the commuter 5 1 3 Description A substantial double fronted brick built period family home, set in gardens and paddock land of approximately 4.114 acres on the edge of this much sought after, conveniently placed village. A unique period family home which is now in need of complete modernisation and refurbishment, allowing a purchaser to implement their own ideas and standard of finish on a superb detached residence. The property retains some original period features, including cornicing, doors and flooring. The property occupies a particularly large site with gardens on all sides allowing the scope for extension and alteration, subject to obtaining the necessary planning approval. There is also a single garage on site. The property does have the benefit of oil fired central heating, which is powered by the Rayburn in the kitchen, though is now in need of general modernisation and updating. The bathroom has been modernised, however the remaining property will require work. There is a fully operational business which is being sold with the property in the form of Paws and Claws Pet Hotel, where trading accounts are available for inspection upon request. There is the scope to expand that business significantly from its current form, but purpose built dog kennels and cattery are on the site. The licence will need updating for the cattery and would need to be knocked down and replaced to renew the licence for cats.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaxby Park Ltd V Harrogate Borough Council
    Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 3204 (Admin) Case No: CO/1290/2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION PLANNING COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 25/11/2020 Before : THE HON. MR JUSTICE HOLGATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Flaxby Park Limited Claimant - and - Harrogate Borough Council Defendant -and- (1) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Interested Government Parties (2) Oakgate Yorkshire Limited (3) CEG Land Promotions III (UK) Limited - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Christopher Katkowski QC & Richard Moules (instructed by Town Legal LLP) for the Claimant Paul Brown QC (instructed by Harrogate Borough Council) for the Defendant Christopher Young QC & James Corbet Burcher (instructed by Walker Morris LLP) for the 2nd Interested Party James Strachan QC (instructed by Walton & Co) for the 3rd Interested Party The 1st Interested Party did not appear and was not represented Hearing dates: 27-29 October 2020 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email, release to BAILII. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 10:00am on 25.11.2020 1 Judgment Approved by the court for handing down. Flaxby v Harrogate BC Mr Justice Holgate Introduction 1. Policy DM4 of the Harrogate District Local Plan (“the Local Plan”) provides for a new settlement within a “broad location for growth” in the Green Hammerton/Cattal area, lying to the east of the A1(M). The claimant, Flaxby Park Ltd (“FPL”) brings this challenge under s. 113 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (“PCPA 2004”) to quash that policy and other references in the Local Plan to that location for the new settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire County Council Executive 15 January 2019
    North Yorkshire County Council Executive 15 January 2019 Harrogate Congestion Study –Options Assessment Report Addendum Report of the Corporate Director – Business and Environmental Services 1.0 Purpose of Report 1.1 To provide an update on the progress of the Harrogate Congestion Study further analysis. 1.2 To set out the broad outcomes of the Options Assessment Report Addendum (OARA) 1.3 To recommend next steps, including potential public consultation 2.0 Background 2.1 Members of the Executive will be aware that a route for a Harrogate Northern Relief Road and Killinghall Bypass was approved by the County Council in the early 1990’s. Following a request from the County Area Committee for the Harrogate District a review of ‘the need for and alignment’ of the adopted relief road was commenced in late 2016. 2.2 As an early part of this study, initial modelling and appraisal was undertaken on various potential relief road options based on work originally carried out in the early 1990’s (see Figure 1 below.) This showed that of the alignments, the two inner relief road options provided the greatest benefits in terms of traffic relief. 2.3 As a result of development pressures, and based on information available from the initial consideration of relief road alignments the Executive recently resolved to rescind the protection of the Harrogate Northern Relief Road and a section of the Killinghall Bypass. The remainder of the Killinghall Bypass remains an adopted route. Figure 1 - possible relief road options considered in the 2017 Options Assessment Report 2.4 As an integral part of the study, work was also undertaken by the County Council’s partner consultant, WSP on looking at a range of other potential approaches for tackling congestion in Harrogate and Knaresborough (study area set out in Figure 2 below).
    [Show full text]
  • Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council: How a New Parish Council Was Created in Pannal, Yorkshire
    Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council: How A New Parish Council Was Created In Pannal, Yorkshire Headlines: The villages of Pannal and Burn Bridge are in the Harrogate district of North Yorkshire. This case study tells the story of how the Pannal Village Society triggered a Community Governance Review, successfully establishing a parish council for Pannal and Burn Bridge. The case study provides an example of good practice for campaigns aspiring to establish a town and parish council, giving advice on how to build a good relationship with the principal authority and how to overcome challenges throughout the campaign. The main lesson to share from this case study is that where a campaign group works positively over a sustained period with both officers and members of its principal local authority it is possible to complete the full campaign journey. To this end Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council held its first elections in May 2016, working closely in partnership with Harrogate Borough Council. Why A Council Is Wanted: Then Pannal and Burn Bridge campaign group wished to establish a parish council as a new parish council is able to increase the illage’s ability to manage its assets and to influence development plans in its area, being a legacy of the Pannal Village Society. The Pannal Village Society was created in the early 1990s under the initiative of a former Harrogate Borough councillor at the time, who had a firm commitment that Pannal was missing out by not having a parish council. Parish Councils are statutory consultees in planning matters and, as such, have to be consulted on planning issues within their parish and, in Harrogate, have an opportunity to present their views at relevant council meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Harr Ogat E, Knar Esbo Roug H and Ripl Ey
    Good reasons to get around Harrogate walking and by foot, bike, bus or train cycling network For health The new traffic free section of National Cycle Walking and cycling to work, the shops, or to visit Network Route 67 links Ripley with Harrogate, friends and family are great ways to fit regular Starbeck and Knaresborough. It allows locals and physical activity into your daily routine. As well as tourists to travel in ways that benefit their health and getting you from A to B, regular walking and cycling the environment, and opens up routes to and from can help you burn calories, reduce cholesterol and Nidderdale and the World Heritage Site of Fountains lower blood pressure. If you take the bus, walking Abbey to walkers, cyclists and horse riders. to the next bus stop along is a really simple way of Each grid on the map overleaf represents an fitting a little more activity into your daily commute. average 10 minutes’ walk or four minutes’ cycle ride, For the environment showing just how quick it is to travel around under your own steam. We all know that our environment is under threat from the things we do. Cars currently make up 13% Ripley, only 3 miles from Harrogate, is now within of the UK’s total carbon dioxide emissions but on cycle regularly you’ll save a fortune, so there’ll be the reach of many more people, including new average if you take a train or coach you’ll contribute more cash to spend on fun things, like you! cyclists and children, as a pleasant days visit on foot six to eight times less than this and, if you walk or Regular physical activity also helps improve your or by bike.
    [Show full text]
  • The Firs Fortune Close, Knaresborough, North Yorkshire
    The Firs Fortune Close, Knaresborough, North Yorkshire The Firs shower and fitted bespoke cabinets and a generous dressing room with plenty of wardrobe Fortune Close, Knaresborough, space which also enjoys views over Nidd Gorge. North Yorkshire HG5 9DD A newly fitted exquisite three piece house bathroom finished in marble. There are three A spectacular family home further generous bedrooms. offering substantial and flexible Situation accommodation located within The Firs is situated in the heart of the exclusive residential area of Lands Lane. Located on this much sought after area the outskirts of the historic market town of enjoying views over Nidd Gorge Knaresborough, it is convenient for commuting to the commercial centres of both North and West Knaresborough 1 miles, Harrogate 4 miles, Yorkshire. Harrogate provides a wide range of York 19 miles, Leeds 19 miles amenities including shops, a theatre, cinema and numerous cafes and restaurants and is about Reception hall | Sitting room | Snug 4 ½ miles to the south west, and the thriving Dining room | Study | Breakfast kitchen | Utility financial city of Leeds is about 19 miles distant. Conservatory | W/C | Shower room | Master bedroom suite with dressing room and en-suite Outside 3 Further bedrooms | House bathroom | Studio/ The gardens surround the house entirely, office | Garage | Work room | EPC rating C providing a high degree of privacy. There is a generous parking area and access to the double The property garage. At the rear is an extensive decked The Firs is a superb family home perfectly terrace benefitting from far reaching views situated in this secluded position, close to across the Nidd Gorge.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRTHDAY WEEK Wednesday 4Th May Poddlers Ride Report with The
    BIRTHDAY WEEK Wednesday 4th May Poddlers Ride Report With the strains of Happy Birthday to you and the remains of the blusher, botox and lipstick dribbling down our faces the Poddlers left the Batz and EGs and very fast boys gathering themselves for a mamouth marathon of cake consumption. Easingwold and Asquith had been alerted and the cakes baked. The Poddlers as ever intent on their cycling performance headed straight out of the rather over excited atmosphere of Hornbeam car park up Leadhall Lane to Ashville, the Squinting Cat, Lady Lane, and Beckwithshaw. We were surging confidently up Norwood Lane when the Fast boys overtook us, most without even noticing their road bound cousins, Richard greeted us helpfully and then Gia and Martyn encouraged New Blue Sue and myself up to Alms Cliff, to join the resting Poddlers. John joined us making the group a nicely rounded fourteen. What wind there was was behind us and we continued easily over the A59 to Menwith. At this point Max was overjoyed that Michelle needed to get back by 12 o'clock and happily volunteered to escort her home, probably chatting in French as they pedalled. I also had visions of the coffee and cakes being prepared so was quite happy to loose the efficient back marker, and knew that two more in the shape of Dave G and Steve would naturally take over. Trevor was behaving well, and only moaning quietly about cakes and hills. As we sped down to Darley before we turned right to Birstwith a record speed was recorded by Paul B (recently released from the tower) of 36 miles per hour.
    [Show full text]
  • 29 July 2019 from 7.30Pm in Darley Memorial Hall
    Draft minutes of the meeting of the Council held on 29 July 2019 from 7.30pm in Darley Memorial Hall 1907/1 Present Cllrs S Welch, D McQueen, E Butler, N Nicholas, A Robertshaw, J McAllister, D Dickinson (late arrival), County Cllr S Lumley (part), Borough Cllr T Watson (part) and the Clerk M Pearson. Nine members of the public attended (four part). 1907/2 Apologies None 1907/3 Declarations of Interest and consideration of dispensations: Cllr S Welch declared an interest in Planning Application 19/02389/FUL as Chairman of the Menwith Hill British American Committee and took no part in the discussion or vote. 1907/4 Approval of Minutes: Minutes of the meeting held on 24 June 2019 were approved. 1907/5 Public Statements: These are included with the relevant items below. 1907/6 Planning a. Planning Decisions noted: 19/02061/TPO Felling of 1 Sycamore and 2 Pine trees within A20 of Tree Preservation Order 05 1970. Fourways Crake Lane Darley APPROVED 19/01621/FUL Three Wells Farm Menwith Hill: Erection of carport and porch. Replacement of UPVC conservatory with an oak frame structure and alterations to doors and fenestration. APPROVED Conversion of existing garage to form a holiday cottage. REFUSED b. Planning Applications considered: 19/02389/FUL Erection of 3 radomes and support building. RAF Menwith Hill Main Street Menwith Hill Camp. Cllr S Welch abstained from the discussion and vote. NO OBJECTIONS 19/02530/OUT Outline application for the erection of 1 no. dwelling with access considered. (Revised Scheme) Land Comprising Os Field 0067 (access next to Tvonnay, Main St) Darley Head Darley.
    [Show full text]
  • NRT Index Stations
    Network Rail Timetable OFFICIAL# May 2021 Station Index Station Table(s) A Abbey Wood T052, T200, T201 Aber T130 Abercynon T130 Aberdare T130 Aberdeen T026, T051, T065, T229, T240 Aberdour T242 Aberdovey T076 Abererch T076 Abergavenny T131 Abergele & Pensarn T081 Aberystwyth T076 Accrington T041, T097 Achanalt T239 Achnasheen T239 Achnashellach T239 Acklington T048 Acle T015 Acocks Green T071 Acton Bridge T091 Acton Central T059 Acton Main Line T117 Adderley Park T068 Addiewell T224 Addlestone T149 Adisham T212 Adlington (cheshire) T084 Adlington (lancashire) T082 Adwick T029, T031 Aigburth T103 Ainsdale T103 Aintree T105 Airbles T225 Airdrie T226 Albany Park T200 Albrighton T074 Alderley Edge T082, T084 Aldermaston T116 Aldershot T149, T155 Aldrington T188 Alexandra Palace T024 Alexandra Parade T226 Alexandria T226 Alfreton T034, T049, T053 Allens West T044 Alloa T230 Alness T239 Alnmouth For Alnwick T026, T048, T051 Alresford (essex) T011 Alsager T050, T067 Althorne T006 Page 1 of 53 Network Rail Timetable OFFICIAL# May 2021 Station Index Station Table(s) Althorpe T029 A Altnabreac T239 Alton T155 Altrincham T088 Alvechurch T069 Ambergate T056 Amberley T186 Amersham T114 Ammanford T129 Ancaster T019 Anderston T225, T226 Andover T160 Anerley T177, T178 Angmering T186, T188 Annan T216 Anniesland T226, T232 Ansdell & Fairhaven T097 Apperley Bridge T036, T037 Appleby T042 Appledore (kent) T192 Appleford T116 Appley Bridge T082 Apsley T066 Arbroath T026, T051, T229 Ardgay T239 Ardlui T227 Ardrossan Harbour T221 Ardrossan South Beach T221
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Precept List 2020-21
    THE COUNCIL TAX IN YOUR PARISH AREA In areas where parish councils raise money through a parish precept, the basic Harrogate Borough Council band D Council Tax of £245.92 has to be increased as follows: Parish Parish Band D Parish Precept Parish Precept Council Tax 2020/21 2019/20 2020/21 Allerton Mauleverer with Hopperton 3.98 300 600 Arkendale, Coneythorpe & Clareton 14.41 2,900 2,700 Asenby 9.66 1,350 1,350 Azerley and Winksley 24.28 6,500 5,900 Baldersby 42.97 5,610 5,500 Bewerley 19.99 7,000 6,800 Bilton-in-Ainsty with Bickerton 34.28 7,060 7,060 Birstwith 25.47 10,500 9,000 Bishop Monkton 20.84 8,641 8,610 Bishop Thornton and Warsill 19.98 5,600 4,500 Boroughbridge 39.37 57,000 54,000 Burton Leonard 20.82 6,583 6,328 Cattal, Hunsingore and Walshford 15.33 2,723 2,678 Clint-cum-Hamlets 18.58 4,600 4,200 Dacre 27.15 10,000 9,000 Darley & Menwith 29.89 15,000 14,250 Dishforth 29.00 8,511 6,855 Dunsforths 18.48 2,269 2,019 Farnham 16.86 1,700 1,700 Fearby, Healey and District 15.43 2,900 2,600 Felliscliffe 18.35 3,275 3,211 Ferrensby 6.48 600 600 Follifoot and Plompton 28.52 10,720 10,500 Fountains Abbey 38.13 4,500 1,800 Goldsborough and Flaxby 22.80 6,660 6,180 Grantley and Sawley 34.76 8,440 7,100 Great Ouseburn 34.57 9,386 9,200 Green Hammerton 37.26 14,000 10,500 Grewelthorpe 23.33 5,288 5,036 Hampsthwaite 23.38 13,000 12,000 Hartwith-cum-Winsley 27.07 12,200 11,900 Haverah Park and Beckwithshaw 19.39 4,900 4,300 Hewick and Hutton 9.18 1,869 1,760 High and Low Bishopside 28.99 27,250 26,750 Kearby-with-Netherby 14.15 1,500 1,500
    [Show full text]
  • Harrogate, Knaresborough, Pannal and Burn Bridge
    NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL (HARROGATE, KNARESBOROUGH, PANNAL AND BURN BRIDGE) (PARKING AND WAITING) (NO 21) ORDER 2015 North Yorkshire County Council (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Council) in exercise of their powers under Sections 1(1), 2(1) to (3) and 4(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (‘the Act”) and Part IV of Schedule 9 to the Act and the Traffic Management Act 2004 (“the 2004 Act) and of all other enabling powers and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part Ill of Schedule 9 to the Act, hereby make the following Order: PART I GENERAL (1) When used in this Order each of the following expressions has the meaning assigned to it below: “carriageway” means that part of the road over which the public have right of way for the passage of motor vehicles and excludes anyway over which the public have right of way on foot only; “charge certificate” means the statement that the penalty charge has been increased in accordance with Regulation 21 of The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007; “civil enforcement officer” means any officer of the Council who is duly authorised in writing in that behalf (from time to time) by the Council to enforce the provisions of this Order pursuant to Section 76 of the 2004 Act and Section 63A of the 1984 Act; “column” means a column in a Schedule or part of a Schedule referred to or last referred to; “disabled person” means a person who holds a disabled persons’ badge in accordance with the provisions of the Disabled Persons (Badges for Motor Vehicles) (England) Regulations 2000 (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Manse Farm Rail Station Study
    Harrogate District Sites and Policies DPD: Manse Farm Rail Station Study May 2013 Foreword The Manse Farm Rail Station study has been prepared following advice and guidance from Network Rail and provides the first step in the consideration of a potential new station at Manse Farm, Knaresborough. The study was commissioned jointly by Harrogate Borough Council and North Yorkshire County Council and prepared by Arup. This work has been undertaken over a period of several years and has involved detailed discussion with the rail industry during this time. The report represents a technical piece of work undertaken at a particular stage in the development of the Local Plan reflecting the requirements of the rail industry. References to the Sites and Policies DPD therefore refer to an earlier stage in the plan preparation process. Provision of a station to the east of Knaresborough has been a long term aim of the Council and a site is currently allocated in the Harrogate District Local Plan (2001) to the west of Manse Farm on an embankment and in a location with limited space to provide facilities such as car parking. Background work has therefore been undertaken for the Sites and Policies DPD to investigate the business case for providing a new rail station and car park as part of the Draft Allocation for a mixed use urban extension at Manse Farm, Knaresborough (K2b) further to the east. The Leeds‐ Harrogate –York Railway Line forms this site’s northern boundary. The line is recognised as a regionally significant transport link within the Leeds City Region and North Yorkshire, facilitating access to labour markets in Leeds, Harrogate and York as well as providing connectivity with regional and intercity services at York and Leeds.
    [Show full text]