Texas Register June 11, 2021 Issue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

GOVERNOR ENFORCEMENT Appointments.................................................................................3587 22 TAC §367.2...............................................................................3609 Proclamation 41-3821....................................................................3587 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ATTORNEY GENERAL LICENSING AND REGULATION OF INSURANCE Requests for Opinions....................................................................3589 PROFESSIONALS 28 TAC §§19.1006, 19.1010, 19.1011, 19.1029............................3610 TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF TEXAS Advisory Opinion Requests/Questions..........................................3591 BOARD OF TRUSTEES EMERGENCY RULES 34 TAC §63.4.................................................................................3615 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION TRANSFERRED RULES NURSING FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSURE AND MEDICAID CERTIFICATION Department of Aging and Disability Services 26 TAC §554.2802.........................................................................3593 Rule Transfer..................................................................................3617 26 TAC §554.2803.........................................................................3596 Health and Human Services Commission LICENSING STANDARDS FOR HOME AND Rule Transfer..................................................................................3617 COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES AGENCIES Department of Aging and Disability Services 26 TAC §558.961...........................................................................3599 Rule Transfer..................................................................................3619 PROPOSED RULES Health and Human Services Commission TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING Rule Transfer..................................................................................3619 ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSES RULE REVIEW 22 TAC §221.14.............................................................................3601 Proposed Rule Reviews TEXAS STATE BOARD OF PLUMBING EXAMINERS Texas Board of Nursing .................................................................3621 LICENSING AND REGISTRATION Texas Council for Developmental Disabilities ..............................3621 22 TAC §365.6...............................................................................3602 IN ADDITION WITHDRAWN RULES Office of the Attorney General HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION Texas Water Code and Texas Health and Safety Code Settlement No- NURSING FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR tice..................................................................................................3623 LICENSURE AND MEDICAID CERTIFICATION Comptroller of Public Accounts 26 TAC §554.2802.........................................................................3605 Certification of the Average Closing Price of Gas and Oil - April 26 TAC §554.2803.........................................................................3605 2021................................................................................................3623 Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner ADOPTED RULES Notice of Rate Ceilings..................................................................3624 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION Court of Criminal Appeals PROCEDURAL RULES OF THE COMMISSION AND Order Amending Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure..................3624 THE DEPARTMENT Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 16 TAC §60.42...............................................................................3607 Agreed Orders................................................................................3624 TEXAS STATE BOARD OF PLUMBING EXAMINERS Notice of a Proposed Renewal with Amendment of General Permit EXAMINATION AND REGISTRATION TXG110000 Authorizing the Discharge of Wastewater ................3627 22 TAC §363.2...............................................................................3608 Notice of a Proposed Renewal with Amendment of General Permit TXG870000 Authorizing the Discharge of Pesticides...................3628 22 TAC §363.4...............................................................................3608 Notice of Application and Public Hearing for an Air Quality Standard 22 TAC §363.8...............................................................................3609 Permit for a Concrete Batch Plant with Enhanced Controls: Proposed Air Quality Registration Number 164504......................................3628 TABLE OF CONTENTS 46 TexReg 3585 Notice of Application and Public Hearing for an Air Quality Standard Licensing Actions for Radioactive Materials ................................3636 Permit for a Concrete Batch Plant with Enhanced Controls: Proposed Air Quality Registration Number 164700......................................3629 Texas Department of Insurance Notice of District Petition ..............................................................3630 Company Licensing .......................................................................3640 Notice of Hearing on Tycon Ready Mix, LLC: SOAH Docket No. 582- Texas Lottery Commission 21-1741; TCEQ Docket No. 2020-1426-AIR; Proposed Registration Scratch Ticket Game Number 2314 "CRAZY CASH" .................3640 No. 159582 ....................................................................................3630 Public Utility Commission of Texas Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Agreed Orders of Administra- tive Enforcement Actions ..............................................................3631 Notice of Application to Relinquish Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier and Amend a Designation as an Eligible Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Default Orders of Administra- Telecommunications Carrier..........................................................3647 tive Enforcement Actions ..............................................................3632 Regional Water Planning Group - Area B Notice of Public Hearing on Assessment of Administrative Penalties and Requiring Certain Actions of Kurt Wolf: SOAH Docket No. 582- Public Notice Regional Water Planning Group - Area B Solicitation of 21-2062; TCEQ Docket No. 2019-1598-PST-E............................3633 Nominations...................................................................................3648 Notice of Water Rights Application...............................................3634 Supreme Court of Texas Texas Ethics Commission Final Approval and Adoption of Amendments to the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Pro- List of Late Filers...........................................................................3634 cedure.............................................................................................3648 General Land Office Order Adopting Comment to Texas Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 3 Notice and Opportunity to Comment on Requests for Consistency .......................................................................................................3648 Agreement/Concurrence Under the Texas Coastal Management Pro- Order Amending Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure (Joint Order, gram ...............................................................................................3635 Court of Criminal Appeals Misc. Docket No. 21-001).................3651 Department of State Health Services TABLE OF CONTENTS 46 TexReg 3586 .
Recommended publications
  • NO. 18-0159 in the SUPREME COURT of TEXAS GTECH CORPORATION, Petitioner, V. JAMES STEELE, Et Al., Respondents RESPONDENTS JAMES

    NO. 18-0159 in the SUPREME COURT of TEXAS GTECH CORPORATION, Petitioner, V. JAMES STEELE, Et Al., Respondents RESPONDENTS JAMES

    NO. 18-0159 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS GTECH CORPORATION, Petitioner, V. JAMES STEELE, et al., Respondents RESPONDENTS JAMES STEELE, ET AL.’S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR REVIEW W. Mark Lanier Richard L. LaGarde Manfred Sternberg Kevin P. Parker LaGarde Law Firm Manfred Sternberg & Chris Gadoury 3000 Weslayan, Suite 380 Associates, P.C. THE LANIER LAW Houston, Texas 77027 4550 Post Oak Place Dr., FIRM, P.C. Phone: (713) 993-0660 Suite 119 6810 FM 1960 Rd. West Fax: (713) 993-9007 Houston, Texas 77027 Houston, Texas 77069 [email protected] Phone: (713) 622-4300 Phone: (713) 659-5200 Fax: (713) 622-9899 Fax: (713) 659-2204 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Respondents James Steele, et al. (See signature block for all other counsel of record) August 20, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... iii ISSUE PRESENTED ................................................................................................. 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS ........................................................................................ 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................................................................ 5 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................. 7 I. THE COURT OF APPEALS CORRECTLY DETERMINED, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, THAT GTECH EXERCISED DISCRETION ......................................... 9 A. The Record is Replete with Evidence of GTECH
  • Useful Internet Sites and Articles Casemaker V

    Useful Internet Sites and Articles Casemaker V

    Issue 2016-03 www.collincountytx.gov August 2016 Useful Internet Sites and Articles Casemaker v. Fastcase—What’s the Differ- opinions from 1947, Texas case law since 1886, ence? Texas session laws since 1995, state court rules, In June of 2014, the State Bar of Texas became and Texas revised statutes with archived ver- the first state bar association to offer its mem- sions since 2001. Just like Fastcase, Casemaker bers free access to both Casemaker and Fast- offers free webinars and tutorials. Casecheck+ case. While both are legal research products, ensures that the case law citations are still good there are some differences between the two. law, CiteCheck shows any negative history and CasemakerDigest is a daily summary of state and federal appellate cases searchable by practice area. A few months after access to both Fastcase and Casemaker was introduced, the State Bar of According to the State Bar of Texas website, the Texas Texas Bar Blog featured an article with a Texas Plan is available free to all Texas lawyers review of both services. Attorney Grant and the Premium Plan is available free to solo Scheiner prefers Fastcase because of its easy firms and firms of 10 lawyers or less. The Texas transition to smartphones and tablets with the Plan includes Supreme Court of Texas opinions Fastcase app, available on both Andriod and Ap- and courts of appeal opinions dating back to ple. The mobile sync feature allows the user to 1759, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals opinions, share search results and research materials the United States Code annotated, Texas stat- across all devices at once.
  • Fortieth Emergency Order Regarding the Covid-19 State of Disaster

    Fortieth Emergency Order Regarding the Covid-19 State of Disaster

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════════════ Misc. Docket No. 21-9079 ════════════════════ FORTIETH EMERGENCY ORDER REGARDING THE COVID-19 STATE OF DISASTER ════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ORDERED that: 1. Governor Abbott has declared a state of disaster in all 254 counties in the State of Texas in response to the imminent threat of the COVID-19 pandemic. This Order is issued pursuant to Section 22.0035(b) of the Texas Government Code. 2. The Thirty-Eighth Emergency Order (Misc. Dkt. No. 21-9060) is renewed as amended. 3. Subject only to constitutional limitations, all courts in Texas may in any case, civil or criminal, without a participant’s consent: a. except as provided in paragraph 4, modify or suspend any and all deadlines and procedures, whether prescribed by statute, rule, or order, for a stated period ending no later than October 1, 2021; b. except as this Order provides otherwise, allow or require anyone involved in any hearing, deposition, or other proceeding of any kind—including but not limited to a party, attorney, witness, court reporter, grand juror, or petit juror—to participate remotely, such as by teleconferencing, videoconferencing, or other means; c. consider as evidence sworn statements made out of court or sworn testimony given remotely, out of court, such as by teleconferencing, videoconferencing, or other means; d. conduct proceedings away from the court’s usual location with reasonable notice and access to the participants and the public; e. require every participant in a proceeding to alert the court if the participant has, or knows of another participant who has: (i) COVID-19 or a fever, chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, sore throat, loss of taste or smell, congestion or runny nose, nausea or vomiting, or diarrhea; or (ii) recently been in close contact with a person who is confirmed to have COVID-19 or exhibiting the symptoms described above; f.
  • Texas Ethics Commission 2009 List of Registered Lobbyists with Employers/Clients (Emp/C) Sorted by Lobbyist Name

    Texas Ethics Commission 2009 List of Registered Lobbyists with Employers/Clients (Emp/C) Sorted by Lobbyist Name

    TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION 2009 LIST OF REGISTERED LOBBYISTS WITH EMPLOYERS/CLIENTS (EMP/C) SORTED BY LOBBYIST NAME Lobbyist Lobbyist Mailing Address Telephone # Reporting Type Termination Date EMP/C EMP/C Address Comp. Type Comp. Level EMP/C Term. Date Aanstoos, Alice L. 6500 West Loop South # 5100 Bellaire, TX (713)567-7718 Monthly 12/31/2009 77401 AT&T Inc. 208 S. Akard Dallas, TX 75202 Prospective $100,000 - $149,999.99 12/31/2009 Abel, Douglas Deane 1515 Hermann Dr. Houston, TX 77004-7126 (713)524-4267 Annual 12/31/2009 Harris County Medical Society 1515 Hermann Dr. Houston, TX 77004 Prospective Less Than $10,000.00 12/31/2009 Acevedo, Adrian G. 1001 Congress Avenue Suite 400 Austin, TX (512)499-8085 Monthly 12/31/2009 78701 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1201 Lake Robbins Drive The Woodlands, TX Prospective $50,000 - $99,999.99 12/31/2009 77380 Acevedo, Julianne P.O. Box 5352 Austin, TX 78763 (512)971-0775 Annual 08/25/2009 Capitol Anesthesiology Association 3705 Medical Parkway # 570 Austin, TX 78705 Prospective Less Than $10,000.00 08/25/2009 City of Baytown 2401 Market St Baytown, TX 77522 Prospective Less Than $10,000.00 08/25/2009 City of Dallas 1500 Marilla City Hall Dallas, TX 75201 Prospective Less Than $10,000.00 08/25/2009 City of New Braunfels 424 South Castell Avenue New Braunfels, TX Prospective Less Than $10,000.00 08/25/2009 78130 City of Round Rock 221 E. Main Round Rock, TX 78664 Prospective Less Than $10,000.00 08/25/2009 Kimble Public Affairs 6109 Mountain Villa Dr.
  • Article V 363 Judicial Department

    Article V 363 Judicial Department

    363 ARTICLE V 363 JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Sec. 1. JUDICIAL POWER; COURTS IN WHICH VESTED. The judicial power of this State shall be vested in one Supreme Court, in Courts of Civil Appeals, in a Court of Criminal Appeals, in District Courts, in County Courts, in Commissioners Courts, in Courts of Justices of the Peace, and in such other courts as may be provided by law. The Criminal District Court of Galveston and Harris Counties shall continue with the district jurisdiction and organization now existing by law until otherwise provided by law. The Legislature may establish such other courts as it may deem necessary and prescribe the jurisdiction and organization thereof, and may conform the jurisdiction of the district and other inferior courts thereto. History The Texas judicial system reflects both Spanish and Anglo-American tradi- tions. The state's earliest judicial system was of Spanish origin. When the colonists arrived in Texas, the legal system theoretically in force was the Roman civil law as modified by the Spanish. The key figure in that system was the alcalde, an official who had both administrative and judicial duties. The alcalde bore some resem- blance to both the mayor and the justice of the peace in the Anglo-American system. In fact, however, there was no functioning court system in the unde- veloped province of Texas. In 1822, before leaving for Mexico City to obtain confirmation of his authority to colonize, Stephen F. Austin introduced the first Anglo-American judicial institution by appointing a provisional justice of the peace, Josiah H. Bell, to administer justice among the colonists during Austin's absence.
  • Texas Ethics Commission 2012 List of Registered Lobbyists with Employers/Clients (Emp/C) Sorted by Lobbyist Name

    Texas Ethics Commission 2012 List of Registered Lobbyists with Employers/Clients (Emp/C) Sorted by Lobbyist Name

    TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION 2012 LIST OF REGISTERED LOBBYISTS WITH EMPLOYERS/CLIENTS (EMP/C) SORTED BY LOBBYIST NAME Lobbyist Lobbyist Mailing Address Telephone # Reporting Type Termination Date EMP/C EMP/C Address Comp. Type Comp. Level EMP/C Term. Date Aanstoos, Alice L. 6500 West Loop South # 5100 Bellaire, TX (713)567-7718 Monthly 12/31/2012 77401-3520 AT&T 208 S. Akard St. Dallas, TX 75202 Prospective $50,000 - $99,999.99 12/31/2012 Abel, Douglas Deane 1515 Hermann Dr. Houston, TX 77004-7126 (713)524-4267 Annual 12/31/2012 Harris County Medical Society 1515 Hermann Dr. Houston, TX 77004 Prospective Less Than $10,000.00 12/31/2012 Acevedo, Adrian G. 1001 Congress Avenue, Suite 400 Austin, TX (512)499-8085 Annual 12/31/2012 78701 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1201 Lake Robbins Drive The Woodlands, TX Prospective $50,000 - $99,999.99 12/31/2012 77380 Adair, Bobby Glenn 600 N. Dairy Ashford - 2WL 8024F Houston, (832)486-3395 Annual 12/31/2012 TX 77079 ConocoPhillips 600 N. Dairy Ashford Houston, TX 77079 Prospective $ 0.00 12/31/2012 Adams, Cynthia S. 2100 S IH 35 Suite 202 Austin, TX 78704 (512)692-1465 Annual 12/31/2012 Superior HeatlhPlan 2100 S IH 35 Suite 202 Austin, TX 78704 Prospective $10,000 - $24,999.99 12/31/2012 Page: 1 Texas Ethics Commission * (512) 463-5800 * www.ethics.state.tx.us Date Printed: 02/13/2013 Lobbyist Lobbyist Mailing Address Telephone # Reporting Type Termination Date EMP/C EMP/C Address Comp. Type Comp. Level EMP/C Term.
  • The Supreme Court of Texas from Courtroom to Classroom: Mock Oral Arguments

    The Supreme Court of Texas from Courtroom to Classroom: Mock Oral Arguments

    The Supreme Court of Texas From Courtroom to Classroom: Mock Oral Arguments Guide for Teachers and Students: High School Welcome to the Supreme Court of Texas ..................................................................................1 An Introduction to Oral Arguments ...........................................................................................4 Cast of Characters .......................................................................................................................7 Greenhill Mall v. Daniel’s Deli Problem ...................................................................................10 Cindy Rella v. Belle D. Beauty .......................................................................................13 Clark Kent v. Bruce Wayne .............................................................................................15 Dictionary Definitions ...................................................................................................17 You Be the Judge: Sample Questions ........................................................................................18 Brainstorming for Lawyer and Amici Curiae Arguments ......................................................19 Oral Argument Roadmap .........................................................................................................21 Audience Member Activity ........................................................................................................23 Mock Oral Argument Script .....................................................................................................24
  • In Re Lazy W District No. 1, Relator

    In Re Lazy W District No. 1, Relator

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 15-0117 444444444444 IN RE LAZY W DISTRICT NO. 1, RELATOR 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 Argued March 9, 2016 CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court. This original mandamus proceeding involves two governmental entities, one of which petitioned for condemnation of a water pipeline easement across the other’s land. The condemnee asserted governmental immunity, and the trial court refused to proceed further without deciding whether the case should be dismissed. The next step would be for the trial court to appoint special commissioners to make an initial determination of the value of the property to be taken. The trial court is not to interfere in the commissioners’ proceedings and does not become involved again until the commissioners file their award. The court of appeals granted mandamus relief, holding that the trial court must defer ruling on the immunity issue until after the commissioners file their award and a party objects.1 We disagree and conditionally grant relief. 1 ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. App.—Tyler 2015, orig. proceeding). The Tarrant Regional Water District (“the Water District”) supplies water to some two million Texans across 11 counties, including residents of the cities of Fort Worth and Arlington. Created in 1924,2 the Water District is a governmental agency3 with the power of eminent domain.4 In 2010, after years of studies and negotiations, the Water District and the City of Dallas approved a financing agreement to build a 150-mile pipeline to transport water owned by Dallas in Lake Palestine to the Dallas/Fort Worth area to meet its growing needs.
  • Texas Ethics Commission Lobby Activities Report

    Texas Ethics Commission Lobby Activities Report

    TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION LOBBY ACTIVITIES REPORT FORM LA - INSTRUCTION GUIDE Revised January 4, 2019 Texas Ethics Commission, P.O. Box 12070, Austin, Texas 78711 www.ethics.state.tx.us (512) 463-5800 • TDD (800) 735-2989 Promoting Public Confidence in Government. FORM LA – INSTRUCTION GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ......................................................................................................1 Electronic Filing .........................................................................................................................1 Filling out the Forms ..................................................................................................................1 Photocopies of Forms ................................................................................................................1 Substitution of Forms .................................................................................................................1 Filing Deadlines .........................................................................................................................1 Changes to Lobby Registration ..................................................................................................2 Changes to Registration Information During a Regular Legislative Session .............................2 Reporting Expenditures .............................................................................................................2 LOBBY ACTIVITIES REPORT .................................................................................................3
  • The Storm Between the Quiet: Tumult in the Texas Supreme Court, 1911-21

    The Storm Between the Quiet: Tumult in the Texas Supreme Court, 1911-21

    Digital Commons at St. Mary's University Faculty Articles School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2007 The Storm Between the Quiet: Tumult in the Texas Supreme Court, 1911-21 Michael S. Ariens St. Mary's University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/facarticles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael S. Ariens, The Storm Between the Quiet: Tumult in the Texas Supreme Court, 1911-21, 38 St. Mary’s L.J. 641 (2007). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ST. MARY'S LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 38 2007 NUMBER 3 ARTICLES THE STORM BETWEEN THE QUIET: TUMULT IN THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT, 1911-21 BY MICHAEL S. ARIENS* I. Introduction ........................................... 642 II. The Gathering Storm .................................. 645 A. A Time of Change ................................ 645 B. The State of Texas, 1910 .......................... 647 C. Prohibition, Circa 1910 ............................ 648 D. The Prohibition Referendum of 1911 ............. 651 E. The Election of 1912 .............................. 655 1. The Race for Governor ....................... 655 2. The Supreme Court Elections, 1912 ........... 657 III. Reform and Reform Again ............................ 665 A . Justice D elayed .................................... 665 B. Success and Failure ................................ 670 C. Work and Workload ............................... 671 D . Breakdown ........................................ 677 * Professor of Law, St. Mary's University School of Law, San Antonio, Texas. Thanks to Wayne Scott for his comments on an earlier draft.
  • In the Supreme Court of Texas

    In the Supreme Court of Texas

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════════════ Misc. Docket No. 20-9047 ════════════════════ SIXTH EMERGENCY ORDER REGARDING THE COVID-19 STATE OF DISASTER ════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ORDERED that: 1. Governor Abbott has declared a state of disaster in all 254 counties in the State of Texas in response to the imminent threat of the COVID-19 pandemic. 2. This Order supplements and does not replace or amend prior Emergency Orders Regarding the COVID-19 State of Disaster. 3. The Court’s Order issued February 7, 2005, in Misc. Dkt. No. 05-9012, effectively allowed electronic voting in elections of the State Bar of Texas. Since then, voting in those elections has been both by electronic means and by paper ballot. 4. Because of uncertainty regarding the feasibility of handling paper ballots during the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020 elections for presidents-elect and directors of the State Bar of Texas and the Texas Young Lawyers Association must be conducted online only, by electronic vote, and not by paper ballot. The voting period is extended to May 29, 2020, at 5:00pm. 5. The order expires at the conclusion of the 2020 elections of the State Bar of Texas and the Texas Young Lawyers Association unless extended by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. 6. The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to: a. post a copy of this Order on www.txcourts.gov; b. file a copy of this Order with the Secretary of State; and c. send a copy of this Order to the Governor, the Attorney General, and each member of the Legislature.
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of TEXAS Bill

    IN the SUPREME COURT of TEXAS Bill

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Bill Misc. Docket No. 97- ORDER AND OPINION DENYING REQUEST UNDER OPEN RECORDS ACT PER CURIAM The Court has received a request under the Texas Open Records Act, TEx. Gov'T CODE §§ 552.001-.353, from Andrew Wheat with Texans for Public Justice, for "any outgoing and incoming telecommunications records (office/cellular/mobile and fax phones) for Texas Supreme Court Justices and their staffs for the period covering Aug. 30, 1996 to Apri12, 1997." The Court's usual practice when it receives a request under the Open Records Act is to instruct the Clerk to deny the request by letter on the grounds that the Legislature has expressly excluded the judiciary from the Act. The Act requires a "governmental body" to release "public information" on request, id. § 552.221(a), but to protect the independence of the judiciary the Act plainly states, "`Governmental body' . does not include the judiciary", id. § 552.003(1)(B). The exclusion of the judiciary simply could not be plainer, as every Attorney General has confirmed since the Act was passed twenty-four years ago. We must alter our usual practice on this occasion because of Attorney General Dan Morales' recent issuance of Open Records Decision No. 657 (July 24, 1997). For the first time an Attorney General has introduced confusion and uncertainty into the construction of a clear statute. At issue are not merely a few telephone records of the Supreme Court, but all records of all Texas judges and courts. We write to explain why ORD-657 is incorrect.