DOCSLIB.ORG

Honorable Nathan L. Hecht Chief Justice of Texas PRESIDENT-ELECT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Honorable Nathan L. Hecht Chief Justice of Texas PRESIDENT-ELECT Last Revised June 2021 PRESIDENT: Honorable Nathan L. Hecht Chief Justice of Texas PRESIDENT-ELECT: Honorable Paul A. Suttell Chief Justice of Rhode Island ALABAMA ARKANSAS Honorable Tom Parker Honorable John Dan Kemp Chief Justice Chief Justice Alabama Supreme Court Supreme Court of Arkansas 300 Dexter Avenue Justice Building Montgomery, AL 36104-3741 625 Marshall St. (334) 229-0600 FAX (334) 229-0535 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 682-6873 FAX (501) 683-4006 ALASKA CALIFORNIA Honorable Joel H. Bolger Chief Justice Honorable Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Alaska Supreme Court Chief Justice 303 K Street, 5th Floor Supreme Court of California Anchorage, AK 99501 350 McAllister Street (907) 264-0633 FAX (907) 264-0632 San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 865-7060 FAX (415) 865-7181 AMERICAN SAMOA COLORADO Honorable F. Michael Kruse Chief Justice Honorable Brian D. Boatright The High Court of American Samoa Chief Justice Courthouse, P.O. Box 309 Colorado Supreme Court Pago Pago, AS 96799 2 East 14th Avenue 011 (684) 633-1410 FAX 011 (684) 633-1318 Denver, CO 80203-2116 (720) 625-5410 FAX (720) 271-6124 ARIZONA CONNECTICUT Honorable Robert M. Brutinel Chief Justice Honorable Richard A. Robinson Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice 1501 W. Washington Street, Suite 433 State of Connecticut Supreme Court Phoenix, AZ 85007-3222 231 Capitol Avenue (602) 452-3531 FAX (602) 452-3917 Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 757-2113 FAX (860) 757-2214 1 Last Revised June 2021 DELAWARE HAWAII Honorable Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Honorable Mark E. Recktenwald Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Delaware Supreme Court of Hawaii The Renaissance Centre 417 South King Street 405 N. King Street, Suite 505 Honolulu, HI 96813 Wilmington, DE 19801 (808) 539-4700 FAX (808) 539-4703 (302) 651-3901 IDAHO DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Honorable G. Richard Bevan Honorable Anna Blackburne-Rigsby Chief Justice Chief Judge Idaho Supreme Court District of Columbia Court of Appeals P.O. Box 83720 (zip code 83702) Historic Courthouse/Judiciary Square 451 West State Street 430 E Street, NW, Suite 319 Boise, ID 83720-0101 Washington, DC 20001 (208) 334-2149 (202) 879-2730 FAX (202) 824-8588 ILLINOIS FLORIDA Honorable Anne M. Burke Honorable Charles T. Canady Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Illinois Supreme Court of Florida 160 North LaSalle Street 500 South Duval Street Suite S2015 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Chicago, IL 60601 (850) 410-8092 FAX (850) 410-2431 (312) 793-5470 FAX (312) 793-8224 GEORGIA INDIANA Honorable Harold D. Melton Honorable Loretta H. Rush Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Georgia Indiana Supreme Court 330 Capitol Avenue, S.E., Suite 510 200 W. Washington Street, Room 311 Atlanta, GA 30344 Indianapolis, IN 46204 (404) 656-3477 FAX (404) 656-2253 (317) 232-2548 FAX (317) 233-8691 GUAM IOWA Honorable F. Philip Carbullido Honorable Susan Larson Christensen Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Guam Supreme Court of Iowa Guam Judicial Center, Suite 300 1111 E. Court Avenue 120 West O'Brien Drive Des Moines, IA 50319 Hagatna, GU 96910 (515) 348-4961 FAX (515) 348-4964 (671) 475-3413 FAX (671) 475-3140 2 Last Revised June 2021 KANSAS MASSACHUSETTS Honorable Marla J. Luckert Honorable Kimberly S. Budd Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Kansas Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 301 West 10th Avenue One Pemberton Square, Suite 2500 Topeka, KS 66612-1507 Boston, MA 02108 (785) 296-4900 FAX (785) 296-1028 (617) 557-1132 FAX (617) 557-1091 KENTUCKY MICHIGAN Honorable John D. Minton, Jr. Honorable Bridget Mary McCormack Chief Justice Chief Justice State Capitol Michigan Supreme Court 700 Capital Ave., Room 231 P.O. Box 30052 (zip code 48909) Bowling Green, KY 42101 925 W. Ottawa Street (502) 564-4162 FAX (270) 270-7870 Lansing, MI 48915 (517) 373-2582 FAX (517) 373-8980 LOUISIANA MINNESOTA Honorable John L. Weimer Chief Justice Honorable Lorie Skjerven Gildea Supreme Court of Louisiana Chief Justice 400 Royal Street Minnesota Supreme Court New Orleans, LA 70130 424 Minnesota Judicial Center (504) 310-2390 FAX (504) 310-2399 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 MAINE (651) 296-3380 FAX (651) 282-5115 Honorable Andrew M. Mead MISSISSIPPI Acting Chief Justice Penobscot Judicial Center Honorable Michael K. Randolph 78 Exchange Street Chief Justice Bangor, Maine 04401-4913 Mississippi Supreme Court (207) 561-2310 FAX (207) 822-4202 P.O. Box 117 (zip code 39205) 450 High Street MARYLAND Jackson, MS 39201 (601) 359-2100 FAX (601) 359-2443 Honorable Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge MISSOURI Maryland Court of Appeals 50 Maryland Avenue, Room 3140 Honorable George Williams Draper III Rockville, MD 20850 Chief Justice (240) 777-9320 FAX (240) 777-9327 Supreme Court of Missouri 207 West High Street (Zip Code 65101) P.O. Box 150 Jefferson City, MO 65102 (573) 751-6644 3 Last Revised June 2021 MONTANA NEW MEXICO Honorable Mike McGrath Honorable Michael E. Vigil Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Montana Supreme Court of New Mexico P.O. Box 203001 (zip code 59620) P.O. Box 848 (zip code 87504-0848) 215 North Sanders 237 Don Gaspar Avenue Helena, MT 59601 Santa Fe, NM 87501 (406) 444-5490 FAX (406) 444-3274 (505) 827-4889 FAX (505) 827-4837 NEBRASKA NEW YORK Honorable Michael G. Heavican Honorable Janet DiFiore Chief Justice Chief Judge Nebraska Supreme Court New York State Court of Appeals 2214 State Capitol 20 Eagle Street P. O. Box 98910 (zip code 68509) Albany, NY 12207 1445 K Street (518) 455-7741 FAX (518) 455-7896 Lincoln, NE 68509 (402) 471-3738 FAX (402) 471-0297 NORTH CAROLINA NEVADA Honorable Paul Newby Chief Justice Honorable James W. Hardesty Supreme Court of North Carolina Chief Justice P.O. Box 1841 (zip code 27602) Supreme Court of Nevada 2 East Morgan Street 201 S. Carson Street Raleigh, NC 27601 Carson City, NV 89701 (919) 831-5715 FAX (919) 831-5730 (702) 684-1590 FAX (775) 684-1593 NORTH DAKOTA NEW HAMPSHIRE Honorable Jon J. Jensen Honorable Gordon J. MacDonald Chief Justice Chief Justice North Dakota Supreme Court New Hampshire Supreme Court State Capitol Building, 1st Floor, Judicial Wing 1 Charles Doe Drive 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Mail Stop 180 Concord, NH 03301 Bismarck, ND 58505-0530 (603) 271-2646 (701) 328-4494 FAX (701) 328-4480 NEW JERSEY Honorable Stuart Rabner Chief Justice Supreme Court of New Jersey Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street P.O. Box 023 Trenton, NJ 08625-0023 (609) 292-2448 FAX (609) 984-6988 4 Last Revised June 2021 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS PENNSYLVANIA Honorable Alexandro C. Castro Honorable Thomas G. Saylor Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of the Commonwealth Supreme Court of Pennsylvania of the Northern Mariana Islands 601 Commonwealth Avenue, 8th Floor P.O. Box 502165 (zip code 96950) Harrisburg, PA 19120 1st Floor, Guma’ Hustisia, Iimwal Aweewe (717) 772-1599 FAX (717) 772-1605 Saipan, MP 96950 (670) 236-9709 FAX (670) 236-9702 PUERTO RICO OHIO Honorable Maite D. Oronoz Rodríguez Chief Justice Honorable Maureen O’Connor Supreme Court of Puerto Rico Chief Justice P. O. Box 9022392 (zip code 00902-2392) Supreme Court of Ohio Pda. 8 ½ Ponce de León Avenue 65 South Front Street Puerto de Tierra Columbus, OH 43215 San Juan, PR 00902-2392 (614) 387-9000 FAX (614) 387-9069 (787) 724-3535 FAX (787) 725-4910 OKLAHOMA RHODE ISLAND Honorable Richard Darby Honorable Paul A. Suttell Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Oklahoma Supreme Court of Rhode Island Oklahoma Judicial Center Licht Judicial Complex 2100 N. Lincoln Boulevard, Suite 1 250 Benefit Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Providence, RI 02903 (405) 556-9362 FAX (405) 556-9120 (401) 222-3943 FAX (401) 222-1059 OKLAHOMA SOUTH CAROLINA Honorable Dana Kuehn Honorable Donald W. Beatty Presiding Judge Chief Justice Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Supreme Court of South Carolina 2100 N. Lincoln Boulevard, Suite 2 PO Box 3543 (zip code 29306) Oklahoma City, OK 73105 180 Magnolia Street (405) 556-9643 FAX (405) 556-9130 Spartanburg, SC 29306 (864) 596-3450 FAX (864) 596-2202 OREGON SOUTH DAKOTA Honorable Martha L. Walters Chief Justice Honorable Steven R. Jensen Supreme Court of Oregon Chief Justice 1163 State Street South Dakota Supreme Court Salem, OR 97301 500 East Capitol Avenue (503) 986-5668 FAX (503) 986-5730 Pierre, SD 57501 (605) 773-3474 FAX (605) 773-8437 5 TENNESSEE VIRGIN ISLANDS Honorable Jeffrey S. Bivins Honorable Rhys S. Hodge Chief Justice Chief Justice Tennessee Supreme Court Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands 401 Seventh Avenue N. P.O. Box 590 (zip code 00804) Suite 321 8174 Crown Bay Nashville, TN 37219 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 (615) 532-7945 FAX (615) 741-5809 (340) 774-2237 FAX (340) 774-2258 TEXAS VIRGINIA Honorable Nathan L. Hecht Honorable Donald W. Lemons Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Texas Supreme Court of Virginia P.O. Box 12248, Capitol Station (zip code 78711) P.O. Box 385 201 W. 14th Street, Room 104 Nellysford, VA 22958 Austin, TX 78701 (804) 225-2183 FAX (434) 361-0328 (512) 463-1348 FAX (512) 463-1365 WASHINGTON TEXAS Honorable Steven C. Gonźalez Honorable Sharon F. Keller Chief Justice Presiding Judge Washington State Supreme Court Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Temple of Justice P.O. Box 12308 (Zip Code 78711) P.O. Box 40929 (zip code 98504-0929) 201 W. 14th Street, Room 106 415 12th Avenue NW Austin, TX 78701 Olympia, WA 98504 (512) 463-1590 FAX (512) 463-7061 (360) 357-2030 UTAH WEST VIRGINIA Honorable Matthew B. Durrant Chief Justice Honorable Evan H. Jenkins Supreme Court of Utah Chief Justice Scott Matheson Courthouse West Virginia Supreme Court P.O.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fellows of the American Bar Foundation
    THE FELLOWS OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION 2015-2016 2015-2016 Fellows Officers: Chair Hon. Cara Lee T. Neville (Ret.) Chair – Elect Michael H. Byowitz Secretary Rew R. Goodenow Immediate Past Chair Kathleen J. Hopkins The Fellows is an honorary organization of attorneys, judges and law professors whose pro- fessional, public and private careers have demonstrated outstanding dedication to the welfare of their communities and to the highest principles of the legal profession. Established in 1955, The Fellows encourage and support the research program of the American Bar Foundation. The American Bar Foundation works to advance justice through ground-breaking, independ- ent research on law, legal institutions, and legal processes. Current research covers meaning- ful topics including legal needs of ordinary Americans and how justice gaps can be filled; the changing nature of legal careers and opportunities for more diversity within the profession; social and political costs of mass incarceration; how juries actually decide cases; the ability of China’s criminal defense lawyers to protect basic legal freedoms; and, how to better prepare for end of life decision-making. With the generous support of those listed on the pages that follow, the American Bar Founda- tion is able to truly impact the very foundation of democracy and the future of our global soci- ety. The Fellows of the American Bar Foundation 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, 4th Floor Chicago, IL 60611-4403 (800) 292-5065 Fax: (312) 564-8910 [email protected] www.americanbarfoundation.org/fellows OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF THE Rew R. Goodenow, Secretary AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION Parsons Behle & Latimer David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Lisa Brown OAKLAAND COUNTY CLERK/REGISTER of DEEDS
    Lisa Brown OAKLAAND COUNTY CLERK/REGISTER OF DEEDS www.oakgov.com/clerkrod DearDear Oakland Community County County Member, Resident: Resident: II’mIt'm is honoredhonored my privilege toto serveserve to serve as as your ytheour peopleClerk/Register Clerk/Re of Oaklandgister of ofDeeds. County Deeds. Inside and Inside my this pleasure thisdirectory director and you honory willyou to findwillpresent districtfind you district maps,with mcontacttheaps, 2019 contact information Oakland information County for county Directory. for departmentscounty departments and state, and county state, and count localy andelected local officials, elected as officials, well as theas offices of our cities, villages and townships - plus facts about the programs and services offered by the wcounty.ell as the offices of our cities, villages and townships - plus facts about the programs and services oOurffered Super by the Index count andy. Property Records Notification (PRN) service continue to receive national Innovativerecognition. Customer Property fraudService continues to occur so I encourage Oakland County homeowners to empower Innovatthemselvesive Cbyustomer signing Superv foric ePRN. This free service sends an email to enrollees when something is I’mrecorded responding in the toOakland the needs County of residents Register by of making Deeds servicesoffice affectingmore convenient their property. and accessible Create your to everyone, account by visiting www.ocmideeds.com. Iespecially'm respon studentsding to andthe seniors.needs of residents by making services more convenient and accessible to everyone, especially students and seniors. We’veElections expanded happen our every Local year Office – be Visits in the program, know so bringingyou can servicesnever miss to locationsa chance acrossto exercise Oakland your County right includingto vote! Visit community our website centers, at www.oakgov.com/clerkschools, and senior centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Unfunded Mandates: a Unifying Principle of All Counties Ecounty Lines | November 2020
    Protection from Unfunded Mandates: A Unifying Principle of All Counties eCounty Lines | November 2020 There are various protections in place for local governments from unfunded mandates, both in state statute, as well as the execution of laws by the Governor and his departments. However, there is no absolute protection. Collectively, commissioners—assisted by Colorado Counties Inc.—are the strongest defense against unfunded mandates. A statute enacted in 1991 prohibits unfunded mandates, with some exceptions. “No new state mandate or an increase in the level of service…shall be mandated by the general assembly or any state agency on any local government unless the state provides additional moneys to reimburse such local government for the costs …such mandate or increased level of service for an existing state mandate shall be optional on the part of the local government” (CRS 29-1-304.5). The Colorado Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR) took this statute a step further by allowing local governments to end their participation in a program, if funding was inadequate. “Except for public education through grade 12 or as required of a local district by federal law, a local district may reduce or end its subsidy to any program delegated to it by the general assembly for administration” (Article X, Section 20(9)). Unfortunately, in 1995 these two provisions were defeated twice via State Supreme Court decisions. In the first case, Weld County attempted to withhold their portion of payments towards a public assistance program administered through the county. However, the court did not find this payment to be a subsidy (as referenced in TABOR) and declared that as an arm of the state, counties were essentially part of the state and therefore could not subsidize themselves, so the exemption was not allowed [Romer v.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 State Survey(Longdoc)
    AGREEMENTS TO INDEMNIFY & GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE: A Fifty State Survey WEINBERG WHEELER H U D G I N S G U N N & D I A L TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Alabama 4 Alaska 7 Arizona 12 Arkansas 15 California 19 Damages arising out of bodily injury or death to persons. 22 Damage to property. 22 Any other damage or expense arising under either (a) or (b). 22 Colorado 23 Connecticut 26 Delaware 29 Florida 32 Georgia 36 Hawaii 42 Idaho 45 Illinois 47 Indiana 52 Iowa 59 Kansas 65 Kentucky 68 Louisiana 69 Maine 72 Maryland 77 Massachusetts 81 Michigan 89 Minnesota 91 Mississippi 94 Missouri 97 Montana 100 Nebraska 104 Nevada 107 New Hampshire 109 New Jersey 111 New Mexico 115 New York 118 North Carolina 122 North Dakota 124 Ohio 126 Oklahoma 130 Oregon 132 Pennsylvania 139 Rhode Island 143 South Carolina 146 South Dakota 150 Tennessee 153 Texas 157 Utah 161 Vermont 165 Virginia 168 Washington 171 West Virginia 175 Wisconsin 177 Wyoming 180 INTRODUCTION Indemnity is compensation given to make another whole from a loss already sustained. It generally contemplates reimbursement by one person or entity of the entire amount of the loss or damage sustained by another. Indemnity takes two forms – common law and contractual. While this survey is limited to contractual indemnity, it is important to note that many states have looked to the law relating to common law indemnity in developing that state’s jurisprudence respecting contractual indemnity. Common law indemnity is the shifting of responsibility for damage or injury from one tortfeasor to another
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Order Regarding Court Services
    In the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho RE: EMERGENCY ORDER ) ORDER REGARDING COURT ) June24,202l SERVICES ) Over the last l5 months, this Court has issued a series of emergency orders intended to address the substantial health and safety risks faced by the public accessing the courts, court personnel, and participants in court proceedings caused by the community spread of the coronavirus. Since the issuance of those orders, vaccines reducing the risks of COVID-19 have become available throughout the state of Idaho. The incidence rate of COVID-19 infection throughout the state has also reduced. The Court continues to monitor the data and information related to the coronavirus, COVID-19, and its variants, and will adjust court operations orders as becomes prudent with the changing circumstances. In light of the improving circumstances, we have concluded that further modification of our emergency orders is now warranted. In order to continue to foster public safety and reduce the risk of the spread of coronavirus and the incidence of COVID-l9 and its variants, court operations shall be governed by the following rules until further order of the Court: 1. Weeklv Publication of COVID-l9 Incidence Rates: The Data and Evaluation Unit of the Administrative Office of Courts shall utilize data obtained from the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare's COVID-I9 Data Dashboard, and shall determine the weekly COVID-]! incidence rates for each county every Thursday evening after 5:00 p.m. Mounrain Time. The weekly COVID-l9 incidence rates shall be published to the Administrative District Judges and Trial Court Administrators on Friday mornings of each week.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron County Heads to Polls Today
    Mostly cloudy High: 49 | Low: 32 | Details, page 2 DAILY GLOBE yourdailyglobe.com Tuesday, April 4, 2017 75 cents Iron County TURKEY STRUT heads to polls today By RICHARD JENKINS sor, three candidates — incum- [email protected] bent Jeff Stenberg, Tom Thomp- HURLEY — Iron County vot- son Jr. and James Schmidt — ers head to the polls today in a will be vying for two town super- series of state and local races. visor seats. Mercer Clerk Chris- At the state level, voters will tan Brandt and Treasurer Lin decide between incumbent Tony Miller are running unopposed. Evers and Lowell Holtz to see There is also a seat open on who will be the state’s next the Mercer Sanitary Board, how- superintendent of public instruc- ever no one has filed papers to tion. Annette Ziegler is running appear on the ballot. unopposed for another term as a The city of Montreal also has justice on the Wisconsin two seats up for election. In Supreme Court. Ward 1, Joan Levra is running Iron County Circuit Court unopposed to replace Brian Liv- Judge Patrick Madden is also ingston on the council, while running unopposed for another Leola Maslanka is being chal- term on the bench. lenged by Bill Stutz for her seat Iron County’s local municipal- representing Ward 2. ities also have races on the ballot The other town races, all of — including contested races in which feature unopposed candi- Kimball, Mercer and Montreal. dates, are as follows: In Kimball, Town Chairman —Anderson: Edward Brandis Ron Ahonen is being challenged is running for chairman, while by Joe Simonich.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Courts
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. THE FUTURE OF '-. ARIZONA COURTS Report of ,..................................................... : .... THE COMMISSION ON THE COURTS : .... ; '. · \ REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON THE COURTS 1989 120983 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or pOlicies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by A r j z on a Snp..r.e.rne-c.uur.:./-'-___ to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. Arizona Supreme Court COMMISSION ON THE COURTS 1314 North 3rd Street, Suite 330, Phoenix, Arizona 85004, (602) 255-2136 The Honorable Frank: X. Gordon, Jr. Chief Justice Arizona Supreme Court 201 West Wing, State Capitol Phoenix,Arizona85007 Dear Chief Justice Gordon: I am privileged to present to you the report of the Arizona Supreme Court's Commission on the Courts. This report reflects the action-oriented vision shared by the Executive Committee and the various Task Forces for shaping the direction of Arizona's courts into the next decade and beyond. We believe the evaluations and suggestions of the report reflect the need for a balance between continuity and adaptability in the judiciary; between the need for stability and a realistic appraisal of the changes necessary as we face a new century.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of ARIZONA En Banc ) Arizona Supreme Court ) No
    SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc ) Arizona Supreme Court ) No. WC-11-0001-IR IN RE GENERAL ADJUDICATION ) OF ALL RIGHTS TO USE WATER IN ) Maricopa County Superior THE GILA RIVER SYSTEM AND SOURCE ) Court Case Nos.: W-1, W-2, ) W-3 and W-4 ) (Consolidated) (Gila) IN RE GENERAL ADJUDICATION ) [Contested Case OF ALL RIGHTS TO USE WATER IN ) No. W1-104] THE LITTLE COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM ) AND SOURCE ) Apache County Superior ) Court Case No. 6417 (LCR) ) [Contested Case ) No. 6417-100] ) ) ) O P I N I O N __________________________________) Review from the Superior Court in Apache County and Maricopa County The Honorable Eddward P. Ballinger, Jr., Judge AFFIRMED ________________________________________________________________ THOMAS C. HORNE, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL Phoenix By Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General Theresa M. Craig, Assistant Attorney General Attorneys for the State of Arizona THE SPARKS LAW FIRM PC Scottsdale By Joe P. Sparks Laurel A. Herrmann Attorneys for the San Carlos Apache Tribe and Tonto Apache Tribe SALMON LEWIS & WELDON PLC Phoenix By M. Byron Lewis John B. Weldon, Jr. Mark A. McGinnis Attorneys for Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District and Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association SALMON LEWIS & WELDON PLC Phoenix By Paul R. Orme Attorney for Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District and Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District SNELL & WILMER LLP Phoenix By L. William Staudenmaier, III Andrew M. Jacobs Attorneys for Arizona Public Service Company, Freeport- McMoran Corporation, Roosevelt Water Conservation District POLSINELLI SHUGHART PC Phoenix By Lucas J. Narducci Margaret LaBianca Attorneys for BHP Copper Inc. ENGELMAN BERGER PC Phoenix By William H.
    [Show full text]
  • 141097NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. .. ,. .... ... ... • ... 'r .. .., ~~ • -- .. -•• •... --• ""' - • .. .. .. ·r ,.. .. ~ .. ., J' -- ., I - - I . 4" '. • ~ ". ',.. • •~ ~ • ~ 'I -.,,- <.. • - • I. - • --"~ ,'pi.. alaska judicial council 1029 W. Third Avenue, Suite 201, Anchorage, Alaska 99501-1917 (907) 279-2526 FAX (907) 276-5046 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NON-ATIORNEY MEMBERS William T. Cotton Jim A. Arnesen David A. Dapcevich Leona Dkakok ATIORNEY MEMBERS Mark E. Ashburn Daniel L. Callahan Thomas G. Nave CHAIRMAN. EX OFFICIO Daniel A. Moore, Jr. Chief Justice Supreme Court Message From the Executive Director We are pleased to present the Alaska Judicial Council's Sixteenth Report to the Legislature and Supreme Court for the years 1991 and 1992. The Council reports biennially on its dual constitutional responsibilities of nominating candidates for judicial vacancies and of making reports and recommendations to the supreme court and legislature. The report also covers the statutory mandate to evaluate judges standing for retention and applicants for the Public Defender. This report includes a brief narrative section that summarizes Council activities during 1991 and 1992, and a series of appendices. The appendices include a current listing of statutory and constitutional law affecting the Judicial Council, a log of judicial applicants, nominees and appointees, a log of all sitting judges and their retention election dates, and summaries of Council procedures for judicial selection and retention evaluation. Summaries of the Council's major reports during 1991 and 1992 also are included as appendices. The Judicial Council welcomes your comments and questions about this report. Very truly yours, ~;('~ William T. Cotton Executive Director 141097 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin
    Florida Law Review Volume 65 | Issue 3 Article 3 May 2013 Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin Justin Marceau Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Sam Kamin and Justin Marceau, Vicarious Aggravators, 65 Fla. L. Rev. 769 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol65/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kamin and Marceau: Vicarious Aggravators VICARIOUS AGGRAVATORS Sam Kamin∗ & Justin Marceau∗∗ Abstract In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court held that the death penalty was constitutional so long as it provided a non-arbitrary statutory mechanism for determining who are the worst of the worst, and therefore, deserving of the death penalty. As a general matter, this process of narrowing the class of death eligible offenders is done through the codification of aggravating factors. If the jury finds beyond a reasonable doubt that one or more aggravating factors exists, then a defendant convicted of murder is eligible for the ultimate sentence. There is, however, a critical, unanswered, and under-theorized issue raised by the use of aggravating factors to serve this constitutionally mandated filtering function. Can death eligibility be predicated on vicarious aggravating factor liability—is there vicarious death penalty liability? A pair of cases, collectively known as the Supreme Court’s Enmund/Tison doctrine, recognize that there is no per se bar on the imposition of the death penalty for non-killing accomplices.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures
    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
    [Show full text]
  • SJI Newsletter May 2019 | Volume 29, No
    SJI Newsletter May 2019 | Volume 29, No. 8 Civil Justice Initiative Pilot Project Releases Miami-Dade Evaluation In November 2016, the Circuit Civil Division of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida implemented the Civil Justice Initiative Pilot Project (CJIPP) to test the impact of Civil Case Management Teams (CCMTs) on civil case processing. CCMTs were envisioned as an essential component of civil justice reform in the report and recommendations of the CCJ Civil Justice Improvements Committee. With SJI support, the CJIPP created four CCMTs, each consisting of a judge, a case manager, a judicial assistant, and a bailiff. The CCMTs developed a standardized case management process to streamline administrative tasks, triage cases into appropriate case management pathways, and monitor case progress. The remaining 21 judges in the Circuit Civil Division continued to manage civil caseloads under traditional case processing practices and staffing assignments, providing a baseline for comparison. To assess the impact of CJIPP, the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) conducted an outcome evaluation that compared the outcomes of cases assigned to the CJIPP teams with those assigned to the non- CJIPP judges (baseline). The NCSC found that CJIPP cases closed at a significantly higher rate, and approximately five months earlier on average than baseline cases. Shortly after the initial launch of the pilot program, the CJIPP cases experienced a temporary increase in the number of court hearings and case management conferences as lawyers in the CJIPP cases requested modifications to case management orders, including continuances or extensions of time to complete litigation tasks; however, the frequency of these case events returned to normal levels within three months.
    [Show full text]