IPM in Latin America and the Caribbean: Crops for Broad-Based Growth and Perennial Production for Fragile Ecosystems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IPM in Latin America and the Caribbean: Crops for Broad-Based Growth and Perennial Production for Fragile Ecosystems Phase III - Year Two: 2005-2006 Integrated Pest Management Collaborative Research Support Program Annual Report Management Entity for IPM CRSP: Office of International Research, Education, & Development (OIRED) Virginia Tech 1060 Litton Reaves Hall Blacksburg, VA 24061-0334 www.oired.vt.edu/ipmcrsp/ Cover Photo Credit Women selling vegetables in a market in India Naidu Rayapati Washington State University Integrated Pest Management Collaborative Research Support Program FY 2006 Annual Report October 1, 2005 – September 30, 2006 Report Coordinators R. Muniappan Larry Vaughan Miriam Rich Robert Kenny i IPM CRSP Management Entity S.K De Datta, Administrative PI, Director OIRED, Associate Provost R. Muniappan, Program Director Larry Vaughan, Associate Program Director Miriam Rich, Communications Coordinator Debbie Francis, Program Coordination Assistant Robert Kenny, Senior Project Associate and Special Assistant to the Director IPM CRSP Program Advisory Board (PAB) John Dooley, Virginia Tech Alma Hobbs, Virginia State University Bobby Moser, Ohio State University Larry Olson, Michigan State University Thomas Schwedler, Clemson University Johnny Wynne, North Carolina State University Robert Hedlund, USAID S.K. De Datta, Virginia Tech R. Muniappan, Virginia Tech Larry Vaughan, Virginia Tech IPM CRSP Technical Committee Samuel Kayamanywa, Makerere University Jeffrey Alwang, Virginia Tech Mark Erbaugh, Ohio State University Edwin Rajotte, Pennsylvania State University Karim Maredia, Michigan State University Donald Mullins, Virginia Tech Douglas Pfeiffer, Virginia Tech Wondi Mersie, Virginia State University Sally Miller, Ohio State University Naidu Rayapati, Washington State University Sue Tolin, Virginia Tech Yulu Xia, North Carolina State University George Norton, Virginia Tech Robert Hedlund, USAID S.K. De Datta, Virginia Tech R. Muniappan, Virginia Tech Larry Vaughan, Virginia Tech Maria Elisa Christie, Virginia Tech ii Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 5 PHASE III LONG-TERM RESEARCH PROGRAMS.................................................. 7 IPM in Latin America and the Caribbean: Crops for Broad-based Growth and Perennial Production for Fragile Ecosystems ............................................................................................. 8 Regional IPM Program for East Africa: Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda .................................... 13 Regional Integrated Pest Management Research and Education for South Asia.................... 18 Ecologically-Based Participatory IPM for Southeast Asia......................................................... 25 Ecologically-Based Participatory and Collaborative Research and Capacity Building in IPM in the Central Asia Region ............................................................................................................ 33 West Africa IPM Center of Excellence ...................................................................................... 38 Integrated Pest Management of Specialty Crops In Eastern Europe ....................................... 41 Management of the Weed Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) in Eastern and Southern Africa Using Integrated Cultural and Biological Measures........................................................ 43 Regional Diagnostic Laboratories ............................................................................................. 52 Integrated Management of Thrips-Borne Tospoviruses in Vegetable Cropping Systems........ 55 Collaborative Assessment and Management of Insect-Transmitted Viruses ........................... 61 Applications of Information Technology and Databases in IPM in Developing Countries and Development of a Global IPM Technology Database............................................................... 65 IPM Impact Assessment for the IPM CRSP.............................................................................. 67 TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAMS ............................................................... 69 Technology Transfer Activities in Mali ...................................................................................... 70 Technology Transfer in Central America – Guatemala and Honduras..................................... 74 Technology Transfer in the Caribbean...................................................................................... 75 GIS Implementation and Training in the Caribbean.................................................................. 77 Technology Transfer in the Philippines..................................................................................... 79 Technology Transfer – Bangladesh .......................................................................................... 82 Technology Transfer in Albania ................................................................................................ 88 Technology Transfer of IPM Training and Capacity Building.................................................... 91 Development of an Online Reporting System for IPM CRSP ................................................... 92 TRAINING AND CAPACITY BUILDING .............................................................93 Training and Institutional Capacity Development...................................................................... 94 IPM CRSP Degree Training Participants (Graduate students): FY 2006 ................................. 96 IPM CRSP Degree Training Participants (Bachelor’s Degree Students): FY 2006................. 99 IPM CRSP Non-Degree Training, FY 2006 ............................................................................ 100 IPM CRSP Non-Degree Training (Summary), FY 2006.......................................................... 107 IPM CRSP Publications, Presentations, and other Products, FY 2006.................................. 108 Publications and Other Products of the IPM CRSP Compilation for the Year FY 2006 (Summary)............................................................................................................................... 120 APPENDICES............................................................................................................... 121 Appendix A -List of Acronyms................................................................................................. 122 Appendix B - Collaborating Institutions ................................................................................... 124 iii iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Integrated Pest Management Collaborative Regional Programs: Research Support Program (IPM CRSP) is an initiative of USAID. It is a collaborative partnership IPM in Latin America and the Caribbean: Crops among U.S. and host country institutions with an for broad-based growth and perennial production emphasis on research, education, training, and for fragile ecosystems. Lead PI, Jeffrey Alwang, information exchange. The concept of IPM has been Virginia Tech; Partners: Purdue, Penn State, Florida evolving for the past five decades and the Virginia A&M, Ohio State, UC-Davis, and Arizona; Host Tech has been implementing the IPM CRSP project Countries: Honduras, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, for the past 13 years (Phases I, II and III) with and Trinidad and Tobago. continuous support from USAID. It has brought together investigators from 22 US Universities and Regional IPM program in East Africa. Lead PI: nine International Agricultural Research Institutes Mark Erbaugh, Ohio State; Partners: Virginia Tech, and scientists from over 30 countries comprising Tennessee State, Texas A&M, and Wisconsin; Host seven regions, and five continents for the Countries: Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. participatory IPM. Regional Integrated Pest Management Research The objectives of the IPM CRSP program are: a) and Education for South Asia. Lead PI: Edwin advance IPM science, and develop IPM technologies, Rajotte, Penn State; Partners: Ohio State, and information, and systems for sound land resource Virginia Tech; Host Countries: Bangladesh, Nepal, management; b) improve IPM communication and and India. education, and the ability of beneficial practitioners to manage knowledge, resulting in widespread Ecologically-based Participatory IPM for adaptation, adoption, and impact of ecologically- Southeast Asia. Lead PI: Michael Hammig, based IPM technologies, practices and systems; c) Clemson; Partners: Washington State, Kansas State, provide information and capacity building to reform Oregon State, and NC A&T; Host Countries: and strengthen policies and local/national institutions Indonesia, and Philippines. that influence pest management; and d) develop and integrate sustainable resource-based local enterprises Ecologically-based Participatory and into national, regional, and global markets. Collaborative Research and Capacity Building in IPM in the Central Asia region. Lead PI: Karim This program is designed to develop and implement a Maredia, Michigan State; Partners: UC-Davis; Host replicable approach to IPM that will help reduce: a) Countries: Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan. agricultural losses due to pests; b) damage to natural ecosystems including loss of biodiversity; and c) West African Consortium of IPM Excellence. PI: pollution and contamination of food and water Don Mullins, Virginia Tech; Partners: Fort Valley supplies. It combines strong regional IPM
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Integrated Assessment of the Impacts of Systemic Pesticides
    WORLDWIDE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACTS OF SYSTEMIC PESTICIDES ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS http://www.tfsp.info/assets/WIA_2015.pdf Report in brief The Task Force on Systemic Pesticides is an independent group of scientists from all over the globe, who came together to work on the Worldwide Integrated Assessment of the Impact of Systemic Pesticides on Biodiversity and Ecosystems. The mandate of the Task Force on Systemic Pesticides (TFSP) has been “to carry out a comprehensive, objective, scientific review and assessment of the impact of systemic pesticides on biodiversity, and on the basis of the results of this review to make any recommendations that might be needed with regard to risk management procedures, governmental approval of new pesticides, and any other relevant issues that should be brought to the attention of decision makers, policy developers and society in general” (see appendix 2). The Task Force has adopted a science-based approach and aims to promote better informed, evidence-based, decision-making. The method followed is Integrated Assessment (IA) which aims to provide policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive information on key aspects of the issue at hand. To this end a highly multidisciplinary team of 30 scientists from all over the globe jointly made a synthesis of 1,121 published peer-reviewed studies spanning the last five years, including industry-sponsored ones. All publications of the TFSP have been subject to the standard scientific peer review procedures of the journal (http://www.springer.com/environment/journal/11356). Key findings of the Task Force have been presented in a special issue of the peer reviewed Springer journal “Environmental Science and Pollution Research” entitled “Worldwide Integrated Assessment of the Impacts of Systemic Pesticides on Biodiversity and Ecosystems” and consists of eight scientific papers, reproduced here with permission of Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • Multitrophic Interactions on a Range-Expanding Plant Species
    Multitrophic interactions on a range-expanding plant species Taiadjana Filipa Marques Fortuna Thesis committee Promotors Prof. Dr Louise E. M. Vet Professor of Evolutionary Ecology Wageningen University Prof. Dr Jeffrey A. Harvey Professor of Nature Conservation and Environmental Advocacy VU University Amsterdam Other members: Prof. Dr Harro J. Bouwmeester, Wageningen University Dr Tom de Jong, Leiden University Dr Jacqui Shykoff, Paris-Sud XI University, France Prof. Dr Nicole M. van Dam, Radboud University, Nijmegen This research was conducted under the auspices of the Graduate School of Production Ecology and Resource Conservation (PE&RC) Multitrophic interactions on a range-expanding plant species Taiadjana Filipa Marques Fortuna Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 19 November 2013 at 11a.m. in the Aula. Taiadjana Filipa Marques Fortuna Multitrophic interactions on a range-expanding plant species, 229 pages PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2013) With references, with summaries in English, Dutch and Portuguese ISBN 978-94-6173-765-6 The path of a PhD is like an insect metamorphosis. A young caterpillar emerged from the egg of knowledge passes through several phases in the quest for results, reaches a pupal phase while writing and writing and writing And in the end, it emerges as a butterfly with wings to fly.. (Taia 2013) À minha mãe, guerreira e sonhadora.. Abstract Studies on the ecological impacts of exotic invasive plants have mainly focused on inter- continental invasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Insecticides (Neonicotinoids and Fipronil): Trends, Uses, Mode of Action and Metabolites 5
    WORLDWIDE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACTS OF SYSTEMIC PESTICIDES ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS http://www.tfsp.info/assets/WIA_2015.pdf Report in brief The Task Force on Systemic Pesticides is an independent group of scientists from all over the globe, who came together to work on the Worldwide Integrated Assessment of the Impact of Systemic Pesticides on Biodiversity and Ecosystems. The mandate of the Task Force on Systemic Pesticides (TFSP) has been “to carry out a comprehensive, objective, scientific review and assessment of the impact of systemic pesticides on biodiversity, and on the basis of the results of this review to make any recommendations that might be needed with regard to risk management procedures, governmental approval of new pesticides, and any other relevant issues that should be brought to the attention of decision makers, policy developers and society in general” (see appendix 2). The Task Force has adopted a science-based approach and aims to promote better informed, evidence-based, decision-making. The method followed is Integrated Assessment (IA) which aims to provide policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive information on key aspects of the issue at hand. To this end a highly multidisciplinary team of 30 scientists from all over the globe jointly made a synthesis of 1,121 published peer-reviewed studies spanning the last five years, including industry-sponsored ones. All publications of the TFSP have been subject to the standard scientific peer review procedures of the journal (http://www.springer.com/environment/journal/11356). Key findings of the Task Force have been presented in a special issue of the peer reviewed Springer journal “Environmental Science and Pollution Research” entitled “Worldwide Integrated Assessment of the Impacts of Systemic Pesticides on Biodiversity and Ecosystems” and consists of eight scientific papers, reproduced here with permission of Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) As Biological Control Agents of Pests
    Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) As Biological Control Agents Of Pests A Bibliography Hassan Ghahari Department of Entomology, Islamic Azad University, Science & Research Campus, P. O. Box 14515/775, Tehran – Iran; [email protected] Preface The Ichneumonidae is one of the most species rich families of all organisms with an estimated 60000 species in the world (Townes, 1969). Even so, many authorities regard this figure as an underestimate! (Gauld, 1991). An estimated 12100 species of Ichneumonidae occur in the Afrotropical region (Africa south of the Sahara and including Madagascar) (Townes & Townes, 1973), of which only 1927 have been described (Yu, 1998). This means that roughly 16% of the afrotropical ichneumonids are known to science! These species comprise 338 genera. The family Ichneumonidae is currently split into 37 subfamilies (including, Acaenitinae; Adelognathinae; Agriotypinae; Alomyinae; Anomaloninae; Banchinae; Brachycyrtinae; Campopleginae; Collyrinae; Cremastinae; Cryptinae; Ctenopelmatinae; 1 Diplazontinae; Eucerotinae; Ichneumoninae; Labeninae; Lycorininae; Mesochorinae; Metopiinae; Microleptinae; Neorhacodinae; Ophioninae; Orthopelmatinae; Orthocentrinae; Oxytorinae; Paxylomatinae; Phrudinae; Phygadeuontinae; Pimplinae; Rhyssinae; Stilbopinae; Tersilochinae; Tryphoninae; Xoridinae) (Yu, 1998). The Ichneumonidae, along with other groups of parasitic Hymenoptera, are supposedly no more species rich in the tropics than in the Northern Hemisphere temperate regions (Owen & Owen, 1974; Janzen, 1981; Janzen & Pond, 1975), although
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control September 12-16, 2005 Mark S. Hoddle, Compiler University of California, Riverside U.S.A. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2005-08 Department of Service September 2005 Agriculture Volume I Papers were submitted in an electronic format, and were edited to achieve a uniform format and typeface. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside of the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Any references to pesticides appearing in these papers does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by state and federal laws. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agency prior to their use. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife if they are not handled and applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices given on the label for use and disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Invasive Species and Biological Control
    Bio Control 01 - 16 made-up 14/11/01 3:16 pm Page 1 Chapter 1 1 1 Invasive Species and Biological Control D.J. Parker and B.D. Gill Introduction ballast, favouring aquatic invaders (Bright, 1999). While the rate of introductions has Invasive alien species are those organisms increased greatly over the past 100 years that, when accidentally or intentionally (Sailer, 1983), the period 1981–2000 has introduced into a new region or continent, seen political and technological changes rapidly expand their ranges and exert a that may unleash an even greater wave of noticeable impact upon the resident flora invasive species. The collapse of the for- or fauna of their new environment. From a mer Soviet Union and China’s interest in plant quarantine perspective, invasive joining world trade have opened up new species are typically pests that cause prob- markets in Asia. These vast areas, once iso- lems after entering a country undetected in lated, can now serve as source populations commercial goods or in the personal bag- for additional cold-tolerant pests, e.g. the gage of travellers. Under the International Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), ‘pests’ glabripennis (Motschulsky), and the lesser are defined as ‘any species, strain or bio- Japanese tsugi borer, Callidiellum type of plant, animal or pathogenic agent rufipenne (Motschulsky). Examples of a injurious to plants or plant products’, few insects introduced to Canada since while ‘quarantine pests’ are ‘pests of eco- 1981 include apple ermine moth, nomic importance to the area endangered Yponomeuta malinellus Zeller, European thereby and not yet present there, or pre- pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (L.), sent but not widely distributed and being leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella officially controlled’ (FAO, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Native Vegetation on Kangaroo Island: Landscape Resilience and the Triple Bottom Line
    Native Vegetation on Kangaroo Island: landscape resilience and the triple bottom line FINAL DRAFT Richard V. Glatz 21 January 2015 Dr Richard Glatz PO Box 17 Kingscote SA 5223 [email protected] Acknowledgements Sincere thanks to Phillipa Holden van Zyl and Grant Flanagan (SA Department of Environment, Water & Natural Resources Kangaroo Island) for useful comments and editing at various stages of report production. All photographs © Richard V Glatz unless otherwise acknowledged. D’Estrees Entomology & Science Services Disclaimer Although all reasonable care has been taken in preparing the information contained in this publication, neither DESS nor the other contributing authors accept any responsibility or liability for any losses of whatever kind arising from the interpretation or use of the information set out in this publication. Where products and/or their trade names are mentioned, no endorsement of these products is intended, nor is any criticism implied of similar products not mentioned. ii CONTENTS Abbreviations 1! Non-technical Summary 2! Abstract 7! Report Framework & Aims 8! Conceptualising and valuing ecosystem services from native vegetation: a global debate with local implications 10! Ecosystems Services from Native Vegetation 15! Agricultural Pest Management 15! Agricultural Biosecurity 23! Pollination 24! Salinity 26! Biodiversity 26! Tourism & marketing 29! Social and Community Benefits 30! Contributions to landscape adaptive capacity and resilience 31! Threats to ecosystem services provided by native vegetation on KI
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns and Ecological Consequences of Aboveground and Belowground Herbivory
    PATTERNS AND ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ABOVEGROUND AND BELOWGROUND HERBIVORY A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Alexis Clare Erwin August 2013 © 2013 Alexis Clare Erwin PATTERNS AND ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ABOVEGROUND AND BELOWGROUND HERBIVORY Alexis Clare Erwin, Ph. D. Cornell University 2013 Terrestrial plants are embedded in a complex biological network consisting of microorganisms, plants, and animals at several trophic levels. Because plant mass is roughly equally divided above- and belowground, plants function as a key link between the two subsystems. Thus, our understanding of how communities are structured and function may be advanced by considering above- and belowground ecological interactions in tandem. As a model for understanding above-belowground dynamics, this dissertation focuses on the interactions between common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca), a perennial plant native to Eastern North America, and the red milkweed beetle (Tetraopes tetraophthalmus), a monophagous herbivore that feeds aboveground as an adult and belowground as a larva. The broad aims of this dissertation are to 1) characterize biotic interactions in the rhizosphere of A. syriaca; 2) investigate the individual and community-wide effects of above- and belowground herbivory by T. tetraophthalmus; and 3) examine the extent to which A. syriaca growth, defense, and ecophysiological traits are genetically correlated in expression, and how these traits affect the performance of T. tetraophthalmus adults and larvae. Soil-dwelling insects commonly co-occur and feed simultaneously on belowground plant parts, yet patterns of damage and consequences for plant and insect performance remain poorly characterized.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the List of Finnish Insects During 2001–2005
    © Entomologica Fennica. 6 June 2007 Changes in the list of Finnish insects during 2001–2005 Hans Silfverberg Silfverberg, H. 2007: Changes in the list of Finnish insects during 2001–2005. — Entomol. Fennica 18: 82–101. During the period 2001–2005, 769 species have been added to the list of Finnish insects, and 213 species have been deleted from it. At the end of year 2005, a total of 20,533 insect species were known from Finland. The Finnish insect fauna is generally well known. Still, particularly for Diptera Nematocera and Hymenop- tera Parasitica, and to some degree also in part of Hemiptera, there still remains much to be done. H. Silfverberg, Zoological Museum, P.O.Box 26, 00014 Helsingfors, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] Received 10 March 2006, accepted 23 May 2006 1. Introduction ported, and has not been included in the species total. Again square brackets have been employed This paper is a sequel to a similar list published in for the name used in the original record when dif- 2001 (Silfverberg 2001, Entomol. Fennica 12: ferent from the one used here. Other symbols are 227–243), which itself was a continuation of a se- * = new to science and ! = different from the ries of lists published in 1921–1996 first by check list mentioned for the order. Hellén and then by Silfverberg. Insect species A thorough examination of earlier lists added to the fauna of Finland during the five-year showed that a few species had been added twice. period are listed, with references, as are those de- In order to correct the numbers, corresponding leted from the fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Behavior and Chemical Communication in the Order Hymenoptera
    P1: FXY November 15, 2000 11:58 Annual Reviews AR119-02 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2001. 46:31–78 Copyright c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved MATING BEHAVIOR AND CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION IN THE ORDER HYMENOPTERA M. Ayasse,1 R. J. Paxton,2 and J. Tengo¨3 1Institute of Zoology, Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Zoology, University of Tubingen,¨ D-72076 Tubingen,¨ Germany 3Ecological Research Station, Uppsala University, S-38693 Farjestaden,¨ Sweden Key Words sex pheromones, mating strategies, chemistry, behavior, chemical mimicry ■ Abstract Insects of the order Hymenoptera are biologically and economically important members of natural and agro ecosystems and exhibit diverse biologies, mat- ing systems, and sex pheromones. We review what is known of their sex pheromone chemistry and function, paying particular emphasis to the Hymenoptera Aculeata (pri- marily ants, bees, and sphecid and vespid wasps), and provide a framework for the functional classification of their sex pheromones. Sex pheromones often comprise multicomponent blends derived from numerous exocrine tissues, including the cuti- cle. However, very few sex pheromones have been definitively characterized using bioassays, in part because of the behavioral sophistication of many Aculeata. The rel- ative importance of species isolation versus sexual selection in shaping sex pheromone evolution is still unclear. Many species appear to discriminate among mates at the level of individual or kin/colony, and they use antiaphrodisiacs. Some orchids use hymenopteran sex pheromones to dupe males into performing pseudocopulation, with extreme species specificity. CONTENTS Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2001.46:31-78.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Identification, Lifestyles and Mitogenomics of the Elusive Wasp Assemblage Associated with Wild and Cultivated Olives in the Western Cape
    Species identification, lifestyles and mitogenomics of the elusive wasp assemblage associated with wild and cultivated olives in the Western Cape By Chanté Melissa Powell Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Agricultural Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr B. van Asch Co-supervisor: Dr C. Rhode Department of Genetics December 2019 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. This thesis includes one original paper published in a peer-reviewed journal. The development and writing of the paper were the principal responsibility of myself and, for each of the cases where this is not the case, a declaration is included in the dissertation indicating the nature and extent of the contributions of co-authors. Date: December 2019 Copyright © Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract While the international olive industry is greatly affected by the olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae), South African commercial crops are marginally affected. The rich assemblage of native parasitoid wasps found in the region may contribute to maintain B. oleae populations at low levels and has potential applications in biocontrol.
    [Show full text]