Space Policies, Issues and Trends in 2007/2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Space Policies, Issues and Trends in 2007/2008 Space Policies, Issues and Trends 2007/2008 SPACE POLICIES, ISSUES AND TRENDS IN 2007/2008 Report 15, September 2008 Nicolas PETER, ESPI DISCLAIMER This Report has been prepared for the client in accordance with the associated contract and ESPI will accept no liability for any losses or damages arising out of the provision of the report to third parties. Short Title: ESPI Report 15, September 2008 Editor, Publisher: ESPI European Space Policy Institute A-1030 Vienna, Schwarzenbergplatz 6 Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel.: +43 1 718 11 18 - 0 Fax - 99 Copyright: © ESPI, September 2008 Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “source: © ESPI Report 15, September 2008. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. Price: 11,00 EUR Printed by ESA/ESTEC Layout and Design: M. A. Jakob/ESPI and Panthera.cc Ref.: PO-1080321/P29 Report 15, September 2008 2 Space Policies, Issues and Trends 2007/2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 6 Background 6 Objectives of this study 6 Chapter 1 - Global political and economic trends 7 1.1 Global economic outlook 7 1.2 Political developments 8 1.2.1 Europe 8 1.2.2 Asia 8 1.2.3 Africa 9 1.2.4 Americas 10 1.2.5 The Middle East 10 1.3 Major scientific achievements 11 1.4 Selected Focus 12 1.4.1 Europe in 2007/08 12 1.4.2 The United States in 2007/08 15 1.4.3 Russia in 2007/08 16 1.4.4 Japan in 2007/08 16 1.4.5 China in 2007/08 17 1.4.6 India in 2007/08 17 Chapter 2 - Global space sector - size and developments 19 2.1 Global space budgets and revenues 19 2.2 Overview of institutional space budgets 19 2.3 Overview of commercial space markets 26 2.3.1 Satellite services 26 Direct Broadcast Services 26 Fixed Satellite Services 28 Mobile Satellite Services 31 2.3.2 Satellite manufacturing 32 2.3.3 Launch sector 32 2.3.4 Ground equipment 34 2.3.5 Insurance sector 35 2.3.6 Emerging commercial markets 35 Chapter 3 – Global space policies and strategies 38 3.1 Europe 38 3.2 European Space Agency 38 3.3 European Union 40 3.4 Eumetsat 43 3.5 National governments 44 3.5.1 France 44 3.5.2 Germany 45 3.5.3 Italy 46 3.5.4 The United Kingdom 46 3.6 The United States 47 3.6.1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 47 3.6.2 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 50 3.6.3 Department of Defense (DoD) 50 3.7 Russia 50 3.8 Japan 52 3.9 China 53 European Space Policy Institute 3 Report 15, September 2008 3.10 India 54 3.11 Emerging space powers 56 3.11.1 Africa 56 3.11.2 Asia 56 3.11.3 The Middle East 57 3.11.4 Oceania 58 3.11.5 South America 58 3.12 International sectoral comparisons 58 3.12.1 Launch sector 58 3.12.2 Missions launched 60 3.12.3 Overall assessment 62 Chapter 4 - European institutional market 63 4.1 European institutional market 63 4.2 Civilian space expenditure 63 4.3 European Space Agency 64 4.4 Eumetsat 64 4.5 National agencies 66 4.5.1 France 66 4.5.2 Germany 67 4.5.3 Italy 68 4.6 European Union 68 4.7 Security-related space expenditures 68 4.8 The institutional market and its impact on the industrial base 70 Chapter 5 - Space industry evolutions 71 5.1 Industrial evolutions in Europe 71 5.2 Industrial evolutions in the United States 73 5.3 Industrial evolutions in Russia 74 5.4 Industrial evolutions in Japan 76 5.5 Industrial evolutions in China 76 5.6 Trans-Atlantic industrial comparison 76 5.6.1 State of the European space industry 76 5.6.2 State of the United States’ space industry 80 5.7 Sectoral overview 82 5.7.1 Launch sector 82 2007 results 83 Launch contracts awarded in 2007 86 5.7.2 Satellite manufacturing sector 89 2007 results 89 Satellites contracts awarded in 2007 90 5.7.3 Satellite operators 92 Chapter 6 – The defence perspective 94 6.1 Recent trends in military expenditure 94 6.2 Global space military context 94 6.3 European space military context 96 6.3.1 National initiatives 96 6.3.2 European Union level 98 6.3.3 European Space Agency 99 6.3.4 Other European institutions 99 6.4 The United States 100 6.5 Russia 102 6.6 Japan 102 6.7 China 102 6.8 India 103 6.9 Other space actors 103 Report 15, September 2008 4 Space Policies, Issues and Trends 2007/2008 Chapter 7 – The specific roles of institutions 105 7.1 European institutions 105 7.1.1 Council of the European Union and its Presidencies 105 7.1.2 European Commission 107 7.1.3 European Union Agencies 109 7.1.4 European Parliament 109 7.2 Other institutions 110 7.2.1 Assembly of the Western European Union (WEU) 110 7.2.2 European Interparliamentary Space Conference (EISC) 110 7.2.3 Network of European Regions Using Space Technologies (NEREUS) 111 7.3 International institutions 112 7.3.1 United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) 112 7.3.2 UNGA Committees 112 Disarmament and International Security Committee 113 Special Political and Decolonisation Committee 113 Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space 113 7.3.3 Other UN bodies and organs monitoring outer space activities 114 7.4 Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) 117 European Space Policy Institute 5 Report 15, September 2008 Space Policies, Issues and Trends 2007/2008 Introduction Background From 2002 until 2005, the European Space Agency (ESA) published annual reports that provided an overview of the European space sector in a global context. These reports entitled “The European Space Sector in a Global Context” took into account the geopolitical and economic changes that occurred in a given year and which were of importance for the European space sector. These aspects were then analysed in a boarder context. ESA’s annual analysis also presented facts and figures of other space powers in order to be able to view the development of the European space sector in a larger perspective. Objectives of this Study In 2006, ESA’s DG Policy Office tasked the European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) based in Vienna (Austria) under a specific contract to conduct a nine-month study on global issues and trends in the space sector covering the period 1 January 2006 to 30 June 2007. ESA’s DG Policy Office commissioned a similar study in 2007 for the period 2007/2008. The ESPI study “Space Policies, Issues and Trends in 2007/2008” aims to present in a single document, comprehensive data and analyses characterising global space activities from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008. This report provides an overview of the European space sector in a global context. It takes into account geopolitical and economic changes that are of relevance and importance for current and future developments in the European space sector. It provides facts and figures on the latest European activities, while putting them into perspective with the situations of other major space-faring countries, notably the United States, Russia, Japan, China and India. European Space Policy Institute 6 Report 15, September 2008 Space Policies, Issues and Trends 2007/2008 Chapter 1 - Global political and economic trends 2007 and the first half of 2008 was a period countries have also been affected. The marked by the confirmation of several key International Monetary Fund (IMF) is trends that appeared in recent years such as anticipating potential losses and write-downs the economic and political rise of powers in the financial sector of about 945 billion from the “South” like China and India as well U.S. dollars, with banks suffering slightly as the recovery of Russia, while the “North” more than half of total losses, with the rest witnessed limited growth, particularly the affecting insurance companies, pension United States. Climate change and global funds, hedge funds and other investors. 2 warming are increasingly being perceived as Consequently, near-term growth prospects of serious global threats demanding an urgent all major economies have weakened (Table and coordinated global response. In addition, 1). skyrocketing prices of natural resources such as oil and gas, but also the rise of primary According to the IMF, the world output in products’ prices is further aggravating the 2007 reached 5%: a similar level to 2006 global economic situation. (Table 1). Global economic growth is projected at 4.1% in 2008 and 3.9% in 2009 (Table 1). The projections for advanced economies have been reduced significantly in 1.1 Global economic recent months and there are looming threats outlook of recession for the second half of 2008. This is the result of deteriorating market conditions and limited U.S. growth which are The expansion of the world economy affecting economic activities in other remained robust in 2007 (Table 1). However, advanced economies. The main risks to the global economic growth slowed markedly in outlook for global growth are that on-going the final quarter of 2007 following major turmoil in financial markets (partly due to losses in the financial sector originating in the liquidity shortages and increasing credit U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Esa Bulletin 135 - August 2008 45 Vega
    Vega The former ELA-1 Ariane-1 launch pad at Kourou has Stefano Bianchi, Renato Lafranconi & been transformed for Vega. The Mobile Gantry is in place and the site almost complete. In the background, an Michel Bonnet Ariane-5 is seen being moved to its launch site ELA-3 Vega Programme, Directorate of Launchers, ESRIN, Frascati, Italy key element of the European launcher strategy for access to space, the Vega A small launcher is being preparing for its maiden flight in November 2009. The development of Vega passed major milestones in 2007 and 2008, providing essential results in terms of test data and design consolidation. These will lead to the Qualification Flight from Europe’s Spaceport in French Guiana at the end of 2009. This will be an important step in the implementation of the European strategy in the launcher sector and the guarantee of access to space for Europe, as endorsed by the ESA Ministerial Council in 2003. The ex p l o i t ation of this new ESA developed launcher will widen the range of launch services offered by launchers developed and produced by European industry and will improve launch flexibility by providing a more adapted response for a wide range of European institutional space missions, as well as an optimised family of launchers to serve commercial market needs. esa bulletin 135 - august 2008 45 Vega The former ELA-1 Ariane-1 launch pad at Kourou has Stefano Bianchi, Renato Lafranconi & been transformed for Vega. The Mobile Gantry is in place and the site almost complete. In the background, an Michel Bonnet Ariane-5 is seen being moved to its launch site ELA-3 Vega Programme, Directorate of Launchers, ESRIN, Frascati, Italy key element of the European launcher strategy for access to space, the Vega A small launcher is being preparing for its maiden flight in November 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Posture in Space
    Russia’s Posture in Space: Prospects for Europe Executive Summary Prepared by the European Space Policy Institute Marco ALIBERTI Ksenia LISITSYNA May 2018 Table of Contents Background and Research Objectives ........................................................................................ 1 Domestic Developments in Russia’s Space Programme ............................................................ 2 Russia’s International Space Posture ......................................................................................... 4 Prospects for Europe .................................................................................................................. 5 Background and Research Objectives For the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik-1, in 2007, the rebirth of Russian space activities appeared well on its way. After the decade-long crisis of the 1990s, the country’s political leadership guided by President Putin gave new impetus to the development of national space activities and put the sector back among the top priorities of Moscow’s domestic and foreign policy agenda. Supported by the progressive recovery of Russia’s economy, renewed political stability, and an improving external environment, Russia re-asserted strong ambitions and the resolve to regain its original position on the international scene. Towards this, several major space programmes were adopted, including the Federal Space Programme 2006-2015, the Federal Target Programme on the development of Russian cosmodromes, and the Federal Target Programme on the redeployment of GLONASS. This renewed commitment to the development of space activities was duly reflected in a sharp increase in the country’s launch rate and space budget throughout the decade. Thanks to the funds made available by flourishing energy exports, Russia’s space expenditure continued to grow even in the midst of the global financial crisis. Besides new programmes and increased funding, the spectrum of activities was also widened to encompass a new focus on space applications and commercial products.
    [Show full text]
  • Space UK Earth’S Surface Water
    Issue #49 IN THIS ISSUE: Staring at the Sun MYSTERIOUS Helpline from Space Weightless in the Clouds MERCURY Contents News Cornwall Calling Space Weather Watcher Mapping the Route to Mars Honour for UK Astronaut New Satellite Tracks Pollution UK-France Space Deal In Pictures The Sun Features Mysterious Mercury Zero-G Science Helpline from Space Education Resources UK Space History Skylark Made in the UK Earth-i Info News Cornwall Calling The first Moon landing Cornwall Calling Credit: NASA Cornwall could soon be Antennas at Goonhilly beamed communicating with the Moon and images of the 1969 Moon landing Mars, following the announcement and, shortly after it was built in that the world’s first commercial deep 1985, the 32-metre Goonhilly-6 space communication base will be at antenna carried the historic Live Aid the Goonhilly Earth Station. concert broadcast to TV viewers An £8.4 million investment will see a around the world. two-year upgrade of the Goonhilly-6 A Space Industry Bill, announced antenna so it can communicate as part of the Queen’s speech in One of the large dishes at Goonhilly with future robotic and crewed 2017, will introduce new powers missions to the Moon and Mars. The to allow rocket and spaceplane Credit: Goonhilly Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local launches from UK soil. Goonhilly is Enterprise Partnership’s Growth Deal also offering spacecraft tracking and the European Space Agency and communications facilities as (ESA) – which the UK Space Agency part of the Spaceport Cornwall contributes to – funded the contract, funding bid. which will allow Goonhilly to support “We see huge opportunities for ESA’s worldwide network of spacecraft the developing space sector in monitoring ground stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Fusées-Sondes De Sud-Aviation
    Les fusées-sondes de Sud-Aviation Jean-Jacques Serra Commission Histoire de la 3AF Origines : Centre national d'études des télécommunications (CNET) • Loi du 4 mai 1944, validée le 29 janvier 1945 • Demandes d'études - ministères (Guerre, Air, Marine), - Radiodiffusion française, - Comité d’action scientifique de la Défense nationale,... • Etudes sur la propagation radioélectrique plusieurs départements (Tubes et hyperfréquence, Transmission, Laboratoire national de radioélectricité) • Recherches sur la troposphère et sur l’ionosphère Programme spatial du CNET lancé en 1957 selon deux directions : • participation au lancement de fusées-sondes pour l’exploration de la haute atmosphère • traitement scientifique des données fournies par les signaux émis par les satellites artificiels Samedis de l'Histoire de la 3AF Les fusées-sondes de Sud Aviation 15/10/2011 - 2 Contexte : Fusées-sondes existantes Fusées du CASDN pour l'AGI : • Véronique AGI : dérivée des Véronique N et NA (1952-1954) 60 kg à 210 km d'altitude • Monica IV et V : dérivées des Monica I à III (1955-1956) 15 kg à 80 km ou 140 km d'altitude Fusées de l'ONERA utilisées par le CEA : • Daniel : dérivé d'Ardaltex (1957-1959) 15 kg à 125 km d'altitude • Antarès : dérivé de l'engin d'essais de rentrée (1959-1961) 35 kg à 280 km d'altitude Samedis de l'Histoire de la 3AF Les fusées-sondes de Sud Aviation 15/10/2011 - 3 Définition des besoins du CNET Envoi d'une charge utile de 32 kg à 80 km, 120 km, 400 km et 1000 km d'altitude • fusées commandées à Sud Aviation • unité mobile construite
    [Show full text]
  • The Space-Based Global Observing System in 2010 (GOS-2010)
    WMO Space Programme SP-7 The Space-based Global Observing For more information, please contact: System in 2010 (GOS-2010) World Meteorological Organization 7 bis, avenue de la Paix – P.O. Box 2300 – CH 1211 Geneva 2 – Switzerland www.wmo.int WMO Space Programme Office Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 85 19 – Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 84 74 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.wmo.int/pages/prog/sat/ WMO-TD No. 1513 WMO Space Programme SP-7 The Space-based Global Observing System in 2010 (GOS-2010) WMO/TD-No. 1513 2010 © World Meteorological Organization, 2010 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate these publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0)22 730 84 03 P.O. Box No. 2300 Fax: +41 (0)22 730 80 40 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] FOREWORD The launching of the world's first artificial satellite on 4 October 1957 ushered a new era of unprecedented scientific and technological achievements. And it was indeed a fortunate coincidence that the ninth session of the WMO Executive Committee – known today as the WMO Executive Council (EC) – was in progress precisely at this moment, for the EC members were very quick to realize that satellite technology held the promise to expand the volume of meteorological data and to fill the notable gaps where land-based observations were not readily available.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotic Arm.Indd
    Ages: 8-12 Topic: Engineering design and teamwork Standards: This activity is aligned to national standards in science, technology, health and mathematics. Mission X: Train Like an Astronaut Next Generation: 3-5-ETS1-2. Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely A Robotic Arm to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5-ETS1-3. Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can be EDUCATOR SECTION (PAGES 1-7) improved. STUDENT SECTION (PAGES 8-15) Background Why do we need robotic arms when working in space? As an example, try holding a book in your hands straight out in front of you and not moving them for one or two minutes. After a while, do your hands start to shake or move around? Imagine how hard it would be to hold your hands steady for many days in a row, or to lift something really heavy. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a really long arm that never gets tired? Well, to help out in space, scientists have designed and used robotic arms for years. On Earth, scientists have designed robotic arms for everything from moving heavy equipment to performing delicate surgery. Robotic arms are important machines that help people work on Earth as well as in space. Astronaut attached to a robotic arm on the ISS. Look at your arms once again. Your arms are covered in skin for protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Accesso Autonomo Ai Servizi Spaziali
    Centro Militare di Studi Strategici Rapporto di Ricerca 2012 – STEPI AE-SA-02 ACCESSO AUTONOMO AI SERVIZI SPAZIALI Analisi del caso italiano a partire dall’esperienza Broglio, con i lanci dal poligono di Malindi ad arrivare al sistema VEGA. Le possibili scelte strategiche del Paese in ragione delle attuali e future esigenze nazionali e tenendo conto della realtà europea e del mercato internazionale. di T. Col. GArn (E) FUSCO Ing. Alessandro data di chiusura della ricerca: Febbraio 2012 Ai mie due figli Andrea e Francesca (che ci tiene tanto…) ed a Elisabetta per la sua pazienza, nell‟impazienza di tutti giorni space_20120723-1026.docx i Author: T. Col. GArn (E) FUSCO Ing. Alessandro Edit: T..Col. (A.M.) Monaci ing. Volfango INDICE ACCESSO AUTONOMO AI SERVIZI SPAZIALI. Analisi del caso italiano a partire dall’esperienza Broglio, con i lanci dal poligono di Malindi ad arrivare al sistema VEGA. Le possibili scelte strategiche del Paese in ragione delle attuali e future esigenze nazionali e tenendo conto della realtà europea e del mercato internazionale. SOMMARIO pag. 1 PARTE A. Sezione GENERALE / ANALITICA / PROPOSITIVA Capitolo 1 - Esperienze italiane in campo spaziale pag. 4 1.1. L'Anno Geofisico Internazionale (1957-1958): la corsa al lancio del primo satellite pag. 8 1.2. Italia e l’inizio della Cooperazione Internazionale (1959-1972) pag. 12 1.3. L’Italia e l’accesso autonomo allo spazio: Il Progetto San Marco (1962-1988) pag. 26 Capitolo 2 - Nascita di VEGA: un progetto europeo con una forte impronta italiana pag. 45 2.1. Il San Marco Scout pag.
    [Show full text]
  • Ssc09-Xii-03
    SSC09-XII-03 The Promise of Innovation from University Space Systems: Are We Meeting It? Michael Swartwout St. Louis University 3450 Lindell Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri 63103; (314) 977-8240 [email protected] ABSTRACT A popular notion among universities is that we are innovation-drivers in the staid, risk-adverse spacecraft industry – we are to professional small satellites what small satellites are to the “battlestars”. By contrast, professional industry takes a much different perspective on university-class spacecraft; these programs are good for attracting students to space and providing valuable pre-career training, but the actual flight missions are ancillary, even unimportant. Which opinion is correct? Both are correct. The vast majority of the 111 student-built spacecraft that have flown have made no innovative contributions. That is not to say that they have been without contribution. In addition to the inarguable benefits to education, many have served as radio Amateur communications, science experiments and even technological demonstrations. But “innovative”? Not so much. However, there have been two innovative contributors, whose contributions are large enough to settle the question: the University of Surrey begat SSTL, which helped create the COTS-based small satellite industry. Stanford and Cal Poly begat CubeSats, whose contributions are still being created today. This paper provides an update to our earlier submissions on the history of student-built spacecraft. Major trends identified in previous years will be re-examined with new data -- especially the bifurcation between larger-scale, larger-scope "flagship" programs and small-scale, reduced-mission "independents". In particular, we will demonstrate that the general history of student-built spacecraft has not been one of innovation, nor of development of new space systems -- with those few, extremely noteworthy, exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Affairs Monthly Capsule I April 2019 Curren 1
    Current Affairs Monthly Capsule I Current Affairs Weekly Capsule I 9thto 15th April 2019 September 2018 1 | P a g e Current Affairs Monthly Capsule I Current Affairs Weekly Capsule I 9thto 15th April 2019 September 2018 Table of Contents Awards &Honours .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Days & Events ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 International Affairs ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Personalities in News ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Government Policies & Schemes .......................................................................................................................... 18 Science & Technology ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Committees & Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 23 Business & Economy ............................................................................................................................................. 24 Sports ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The International Space Station Partners: Background and Current Status
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1998 (35th) Horizons Unlimited Apr 28th, 2:00 PM Paper Session I-B - The International Space Station Partners: Background and Current Status Daniel V. Jacobs Manager, Russian Integration, International Partners Office, International Space Station ogrPr am, NASA, JSC Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Jacobs, Daniel V., "Paper Session I-B - The International Space Station Partners: Background and Current Status" (1998). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 18. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1998-35th/april-28-1998/18 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION: BACKGROUND AND CURRENT STATUS Daniel V. Jacobs Manager, Russian Integration, International Partners Office International Space Station Program, NASA Johnson Space Center Introduction The International Space Station, as the largest international civil program in history, features unprecedented technical, managerial, and international complexity. Seven interna- tional partners and participants encompassing fifteen countries are involved in the ISS. Each partner is designing, developing and will be operating separate pieces of hardware, to be inte- grated on-orbit into a single orbital station. Mission control centers, launch vehicles, astronauts/ cosmonauts, and support services will be provided by multiple partners, but functioning in a coordinated, integrated fashion. A number of major milestones have been accomplished to date, including the construction of major elements of flight hardware, the development of opera- tions and sustaining engineering centers, astronaut training, and seven Space Shuttle/Mir docking missions.
    [Show full text]
  • IFC-AMC Motion to Dismiss
    Case 1:17-cv-01494-VAC-SRF Document 34-1 Filed 02/16/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1030 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JUANA DOE I et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § vs. § § C.A. No. 17-1494-VAC-SRF IFC ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY, § LLC, § § Defendant. § [PROPOSED] ORDER WHEREAS, Defendant IFC Asset Management Company, LLC, having moved to dismiss the claims in Plaintiff Juana Doe I et al.’s Complaint (D.I. 1); and, WHEREAS, the Court having considered the briefs and arguments in support of and in opposition to said Motion; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this _______ day of ____________, 2018, that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. _______________________________ United States District Judge RLF1 18887565v.1 Case 1:17-cv-01494-VAC-SRF Document 34-1 Filed 02/16/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1030 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JUANA DOE I et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § vs. § § C.A. No. 17-1494-VAC-SRF IFC ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY, § LLC, § § Defendant. § [PROPOSED] ORDER WHEREAS, Defendant IFC Asset Management Company, LLC, having moved to dismiss the claims in Plaintiff Juana Doe I et al.’s Complaint (D.I. 1); and, WHEREAS, the Court having considered the briefs and arguments in support of and in opposition to said Motion; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this _______ day of ____________, 2018, that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. _______________________________ United States District Judge RLF1 18887565v.1 Case 1:17-cv-01494-VAC-SRF Document 35 Filed 02/16/18 Page 1 of 51 PageID #: 1031 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JUANA DOE I et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § vs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Call for a New Human Missions Cost Model
    A Call For A New Human Missions Cost Model NASA 2019 Cost and Schedule Analysis Symposium NASA Johnson Space Center, August 13-15, 2019 Joseph Hamaker, PhD Christian Smart, PhD Galorath Human Missions Cost Model Advocates Dr. Joseph Hamaker Dr. Christian Smart Director, NASA and DoD Programs Chief Scientist • Former Director for Cost Analytics • Founding Director of the Cost and Parametric Estimating for the Analysis Division at NASA U.S. Missile Defense Agency Headquarters • Oversaw development of the • Originator of NASA’s NAFCOM NASA/Air Force Cost Model cost model, the NASA QuickCost (NAFCOM) Model, the NASA Cost Analysis • Provides subject matter expertise to Data Requirement and the NASA NASA Headquarters, DARPA, and ONCE database Space Development Agency • Recognized expert on parametrics 2 Agenda Historical human space projects Why consider a new Human Missions Cost Model Database for a Human Missions Cost Model • NASA has over 50 years of Human Space Missions experience • NASA’s International Partners have accomplished additional projects . • There are around 70 projects that can provide cost and schedule data • This talk will explore how that data might be assembled to form the basis for a Human Missions Cost Model WHY A NEW HUMAN MISSIONS COST MODEL? NASA’s Artemis Program plans to Artemis needs cost and schedule land humans on the moon by 2024 estimates Lots of projects: Lunar Gateway, Existing tools have some Orion, landers, SLS, commercially applicability but it seems obvious provided elements (which we may (to us) that a dedicated HMCM is want to independently estimate) needed Some of these elements have And this can be done—all we ongoing cost trajectories (e.g.
    [Show full text]