Jahresbericht 2012 Annual Report 2012 Weltweit Engagiert
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Austrian Music Export Handbook
Austrian Music Export Handbook Table of Contents Imprint.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 PART 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION.................................................................................................................................................... 7 Geogr p!ic l # t nd Tr n$port In%r $tructure.............................................................................................................. 7 Gener l In%ormation ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Town$ nd Citie$ ...................................................................................................................................................................... ( Admini$tr ti)e #i)i$ion$......................................................................................................................................................... * Tr n$port +Touring in Au$tri ,.............................................................................................................................................. * Import nt Cont ct$, Re" ted Lin.$ .............................................................................................................................. -
ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions. -
Vote, Vte, Vote
Vote, vote, vote Exploring European Electoral Systems AUTHORS Antoaneta Asenova, Skirmantas Baikauskas, Anouk van Brug, Hunor Deak, Benjamin Fievet, Rowan Fitton, Andre Gruber, Soni Harizanov, Lucas Honoré, Arthur Kharytonov, Mijat Kontic, Ashmita Krishna, Roman Leuta, Christoph Gerrit von Zedlitz. Liesen, Lukas Lunøe, Teresė Škutaitė, Olha Tsurkan and Editors: Chris Giapitzis-Papandreou & Danica Vihinen Cover design: Edgaras Mascinskas Published by the European Liberal Forum asbl with the support of LYMEC. Co-funded by the European Parliament. Neither the European Parliament nor the European Liberal Forum asbl are responsible for the content of this publication, or for any use that may be made of it. The views expressed herein are those of the authors alone. These views do not necessarily reflect those of the European Parliament, the European Liberal Forum asbl, or LYMEC. © 2018 European Liberal Forum First Printing: 2018 ISBN 978-0-244-99376-4 ELF European Liberal Forum, asbl Brussels, Belgium www.liberalforum.eu– LYMEC European Liberal Youth, asbl Brussels, Belgium www.lymec.eu– Contents Introduction by LYMEC Secretary General Danica Vihinen .......................................................................................... 4 Foreword by LYMEC President Svenja Hahn ................. 5 Different election systems - an introduction and political discussion ................................................................... 8 Journey through EU election systems ............................ 13 What qualities should the European Parliamentary -
Challenger Party List
Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against -
Annual Report 2010 Jahresbericht Jahresbericht | Annual Report Annual | 2010
www.freiheit.org 2010 | Annual Report Jahresbericht Jahresbericht | Annual Report 2010 Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung www.freiheit.org „… dass wir selber frei zu werden suchen, soviel uns immer möglich ist.“* “… that we seek to achieve freedom, as far as the circumstances permit …”* Friedrich Naumann, Theologe und Politiker – geboren 1860, gestorben 1919 – Mitbegründer und Vorsitzender der 1918 ins Leben gerufenen Deutschen Demokratischen Partei, Abgeord neter der verfassunggebenden Nationalversammlung in Weimar, Herausgeber der Zeitschrift „Die Hilfe“ und erfolgreicher Autor politischer Sachbücher. Namensgeber der liberalen FriedrichNaumannStiftung für die Freiheit. Friedrich Naumann, theologian and politician – born 1860, died 1919 – cofounder and chairman of the German Democratic Party founded in 1918, MP of the constituent national assembly in Weimar, editor of the “Die Hilfe” magazine and successful author of political books. Namegiver of the liberal Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. * Zitat aus „Das Ideal der Freiheit“, Friedrich Naumann, 1905 * Citation from “The Ideal of Freedom”, by Friedrich Naumann, 1905 Vorwort 150 Jahre Friedrich Naumann und 20 Jahre deutsche Einheit 150 Years Friedrich Naumann and 20 Years of German Reunification Das Jahr 2010 war nicht arm an politischen There was no dearth of political headlines in Schlagzeilen. Es war das Jahr der EuroKrise und 2010. It was the year of the euro crisis and of at der Versuche, dem Verfall der Gemeinschafts tempts to counter the decline of the single cur währung entgegenzuwirken; es war das Jahr des rency; it was the year of a change in government Regierungswechsels in NordrheinWestfalen, und in North RhineWestphalia, and it was the year es war das Jahr des Rücktritts von Bundesprä when Federal President Köhler stepped down, just sident Köhler, gerade zwölf Monate nach seiner twelve months after his reelection in May 2009. -
The Impact of the Financial Crisis on European Solidarity
FUTURE OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL CRISIS ON EUROPEAN SOLIDARITY A conference organised by the European Liberal Forum asbl (ELF) with the support of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom (Germany), the Centre for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic). With the special support of the Association for International Affairs (Czech Republic). Funded by the European Parliament. Official media coverage by EurActiv.cz. Prague, 6 September 2012 Venue: Kaiserstein Palace, Malostranské náměstí 23/37, 110 00 Prague 1, Czech Republic Contents Synopsis ...................................................................3 Panel #1 ...................................................................4 Panel #2 ...................................................................5 Panel #3 ...................................................................6 Programme .................................................................7 Speakers ...................................................................9 Team ......................................................................14 European Liberal Forum .......................................................15 Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom .......................................17 Association for International Affairs ...............................................18 Logos of organizers and partners . .19 2 Synopsis Although the ongoing crisis in the EU is primarily depicted by the media as an economic one (the “Greek Crisis” or, more precisely, the “Sovereign Debt Crisis”), -
Download All with Our Work on a Daily Basis, All Year Round
EUROPEAN LIBERAL FORUM ANNUAL REPORT 2016 WELCOME ANNUAL REPORT 2016 EUROPEAN LIBERAL FORUM COPYRIGHT 2017 EUROPEAN LIBERAL© FORUM ASBL. All rights reserved. Content is subject to copyright. Any use and re-use requires approval. This publication was co-funded by the European Parliament. The European Parliament is not responsible for the content of this publication, or for any use that may be made of it. WELCOME CONTENTS THE ELF ANNUAL REPORT 2016 WELCOME 02 Letter From the President 04 Foreword by the Executive Director 05 GET TO KNOW US 06 Our Brochures | Connect With Us 07 Where Did You Meet Us in 2016? 08 OUR FOCUS 09 SECURITY EU Defence and Security Policies – Making Europe Safer for Citizens 10 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Europe’s Energy Future 12 MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION Liberal Answers to Challenges on Sea Liberal Answers to Challenges on Land Integration Through Education 14 EUROPEAN VALUES Ralf Dahrendorf Roundtable: Talk for Europe 16 DIGITALISATION Digital Security Duet: Making European Cyber Defences More Resilient Through Public-Private Partnerships 18 List of all projects 20 List of Ralf Dahrendorf Roundtables 2016 21 Photos 22 ABOUT US 31 Member Organisations 32 List of all Member Organisations 70 The Board of Directors 72 The Secretariat 75 Imprint 77 3 EUROPEAN LIBERAL FORUM / ANNUAL REPORT 2016 WELCOME WELCOME LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT DR JÜRGEN MARTENS The unpredictable and sud- stitutions and for a way to move den political changes that 2016 forward. brought caught all of us in Eu- rope off guard. Brexit, the elec- At ELF, we seek to inspire and tion of Donald Trump as President support these developments. -
Liberal Vision 13 Your Regular Roundup of News from Liberal International
SUBSCRIBE TO THIS NEWSLETTER Liberal International has inaugurated the global Council of Liberal Presidents. Presidents of the regional liberal networks worldwide met virtually to discuss the challenges facing each continent and coordinate cooperation in the global fight to defeat COVID19. Convened by Hakima Elhaité, President of Liberal International, the council of liberal presidents expressed solidarity with the large-scale protests around the world campaigning against violence and systemic racism, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! solidarity with the large-scale protests around the world campaigning against violence and systemic racism, affirmed that democracy & the freedom of speech and assembly should not become victims of the pandemic and that only by strengthening multilateral cooperation can the world mitigate the greatest challenges to international peace and stability in our time. The 5 presidents drew up an action plan to address a number of the challenges raised. Read the following statement Joined by: Africa Liberal Network President Gilbert Noël Ouédraogo ALDE Party President Hans van Baalen Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats Chair Bi-Khim Hsiao Red Liberal de América Latina - Relial President Ricardo Gomes WATCH VIDEO 'Everything's Under Control: the pandemic of power-grabs' The coronavirus pandemic has devalued the rule of law, eroded democratic norms and allowed autocrats to tighten their grip on power. This week Hong Kong, Russia, and, just a few hours ago, the Philippines have all seen outrageous abuses of liberal-democratic structures to help autocrats consolidate control. Joining the debate: European Union Commissioner for Justice, Didier Reynders. Open Society European Policy Institute Director, Heather Grabbe Liberal International President, Hakima Elhaité WATCH HERE Hong Kong politician and pro-democracy activist, Emily Lau Covid-19 : Et si le Libéralisme et la Mondialisation sont la solution et non le problème ? Nous avons le plaisir de vous inviter au webinaire sur "Covid-19: .. -
Jahresbericht 2011 Annual Report 2011 Weltweit Engagiert
Jahresbericht 2011 Annual Report 2011 Weltweit engagiert. Für die Freiheit. Active Worldwide. For Freedom. „… Freiheit ist eine ganz persönliche Angelegenheit, und wenn sie das nicht ist, dann gibt es keine freien Staaten und keine freien Kulturen.“ Zitat aus „Das Ideal der Freiheit“, Friedrich Naumann, 1905 Friedrich Naumann, Theologe und Politiker – geboren 1860, gestorben 1919 – Mitbegründer und Vorsitzender der 1918 ins Leben gerufenen Deutschen Demokratischen Partei, Abgeordneter der verfassunggebenden Nationalversammlung in Weimar, Herausgeber der Zeitschrift „Die Hilfe“ und erfolgreicher Autor politischer Sachbücher. Namensgeber der liberalen Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit. “… Freedom is a very personal affair and if this is not the case, then there can be no free nations and no free civilizations.” Quotation from “The Ideal of Freedom”, Friedrich Naumann, 1905 Friedrich Naumann, theologian and politician – born 1860, died 1919 – co-founder and chairman of the German Demo- cratic Party founded in 1918, MP of the constituent National Assembly in Weimar, editor of “Die Hilfe” magazine and suc- cessful author of political books. Name-giver of the liberal Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. 2 Weltweit im Einsatz für die Freiheit In Action for Freedom All over the World Das Jahr 2011 war das Jahr des Arabischen Frühlings und der europäischen 2011 was the year of the Arab Spring and the European crisis Krisengipfel. Während in der arabischen Welt die Menschen für ihren summits. While people in the Arab world took to the streets Freiheitskampf gegen autoritäre Regime auf die Straße gingen, spannten in their struggle for freedom from authoritarian regimes, europäische Politiker Rettungsschirme in nicht gekannten Dimensionen European politicians were offering rescue packages of un- auf. -
41 Winter 2003.Indd
For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 41 / Winter 2003 / £5.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y The Fall of the Lloyd George Coalition Meeting report Margaret Macmillan, Andrew Thorpe, John Barnes, Stuart Ball Andrew Hudson The history of the Lib-Labs Labour interests within the Liberal Party Jaime Reynolds and Robert Ingham Archie Macdonald MP for Roxburgh and Selkirk, 1950–51: biography Jürgen Frölich The German Liberals Between third force and marginal force Adrian Slade ‘Hard man’ with heart Interview with Bill Rodgers Liberal Democrat History Group Oral history Interviewers needed We would like to hear from nother new, but related, anyone willing to volunteer HISTORY History Group project some time to interview a Ais a new publication: small number of key Liberal an Oral History of twenti- (or SDP or Liberal Demo- eth century Liberalism – a crat) activists about their thematic study of the Liberal period in the party, and their GROUP NEWS Party and liberalism, drawing experience in particular areas upon interviews with Lib- (campaigning, for example, eral activists and politicians, or policy-making, or party Contribute to Whatever your experi- as well as autobiographical organisation). ence, you are welcome to sources. Liberal Democrat Guidance will be given contribute. If you have or Many of the necessary with questions and interview history know of party records or interviews have already been techniques. other documentary material conducted, for other pur- If you are able to help, he Liberal Democrat that might be of historical poses (such as PhD theses), please write to Robert Ing- History Group is aiming interest please give us details. -
Digital Freedom - Liberal Web Policy and Civil Rights Online
Visiting Program for Participants from the SOOE Digital freedom - liberal web policy and civil rights online 16 - 23 March 2019 in Berlin and Hamburg Program: Toni Richard Crisolli, Program Coordinator Smart Cities Education Initiative SCEI e-Learning and New Media, Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit Western Balkans Rahel Zibner, Program Coordinator International Academy for Leadership Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, Berlin Mobile: +49-170-5621568 Hotel: 16. – 21.03.19 Upstalsboom Hotel Friedrichshain Gubener Str. 42 10243 Berlin phone +49-30-29375-830 21. – 23.03.19 Ibis Hotel Hamburg Alster Holzdamm 4 – 12 + 16 20099 Hamburg phone +49-40-24829-701 Interpreters: (English-German) Sylvia Schreiber (18. – 22.03.) Antje Eiger (18. + 19.03.) Stefanie Becker (20. – 22.03.) Transport: LCSB, Berlin N.N., Hamburg As of: 12.03.2019 Rahel Zibner, Programmkoordinatorin Tel. : +49 (30) 288 778 41 Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit, Büro Berlin Fax : +49 (30) 288 778 585 Fachbereich Internationales E-Mail : Referat Internationale Besuchsprogramme / International Visiting [email protected] Programs www.freiheit.org Reinhardtstr. 14 10117 Berlin Saturday, 16 March 2019 From the morning Pick up of participants at Berlin airport at the gate and transfer to the hotel 19.00 Introduction to the program • Welcome and introduction of participants • Clarification of organizational issues • Introduction to the program Rahel Zibner, Program Coordinator, International Academy for Leadership, Friedrich Naumann Foundation for -
Europe's Party Politics: Liberal, Illiberal, Or Quasi-Liberal? N° 02 • April 2021
Policy Brief N° 02 April 2021 EUROPE’S PARTY POLITICS: LIBERAL, ILLIBERAL, OR QUASI-LIBERAL? For a time, post-war European politics was dominated by the liberal type of party. These broadly liberal parties were who originally envisaged the idea of a united Europe and subse- quently carried the torch for the advancement of open society in a progressively integrated Europe under rule of law. 1/5 Takis S. Pappas PhD, full-time researcher and writer, Introduction University of Helsinki, Finland Over many decades, Europe’s party systems op- split along many, often crosscutting, divisions that erated as liberal political cartels in which the ma- generate conflict. Liberal parties’ second common jor parties competed for power against each other, characteristic is their understanding of the need largely unchallenged by other party types. Fast for- to behave moderately, seek consensus, and prefer ward to the present day, and the talk around town positive-sum outcomes. This need is best met via is about the decline of the formerly established lib- liberal parties’ third characteristic, which is their eral parties, the proliferation of new populist ones, adherence to safeguards for minority rights and and, ominously enough, the rise of various other the rule of law, as expressed primarily in written so-called anti-system parties – leading to democrat- constitutions. In addition to these three core char- ic backsliding and, potentially, the disintegration of acteristics, the vast majority of Europe’s post-war the European Union. Which part of this