Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Sea-Level Estimates: Backstripping Analysis of Borehole Data, Onshore New Jersey William A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Sea-Level Estimates: Backstripping Analysis of Borehole Data, Onshore New Jersey William A Basin Research (2004) 16, 451–465, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2004.00242.x Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic sea-level estimates: backstripping analysis of borehole data, onshore New Jersey William A. Van Sickel,n1 Michelle A. Kominz,n Kenneth G. Millerw and James V. Browningw nDepartment of Geosciences,Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA wDepartment of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University,Piscataway, NJ, USA ABSTRACT Backstripping analysis of the Bass River and Ancora boreholes from the New Jersey coastal plain (Ocean Drilling Project Leg174AX) provides new Late Cretaceous sea-level estimates and corroborates previously published Cenozoic sea-level estimates. Compaction histories of all coastal plain boreholes were updated using porosity^depth relationships estimated from New Jersey coastal plain electric logs.The new porosity estimates are considerably lower than those previously calculated at the o¡shore Cost B-2 well.Amplitudes and durations of sea-levelvariations are comparable in sequences that are represented at multiple boreholes, suggesting that the resultant curves are an approximation of regional sea level. Both the amplitudes and durations of third-order (0.5^5 Myr) cycles tend to decrease from the Late Cretaceous to the late Miocene.Third-order sea-level amplitudes in excess of 60 m are not observed. Long-term (108^107 years) sea level was approximately constant at 30^80 m in the Late Cretaceous, rose to a maximum early Eocene value of approximately 100^140 m, and then fell through the Eocene and Oligocene. INTRODUCTION Estimates for the Late Cretaceous to the Miocene based on changing ocean volumes (e.g., Harrison, 1990) are One of the more complex problems involved in unravelling somewhat higher than estimates based on continental Earth history is determination of the record of global hypsometry (Bond, 1979) and on backstripping (Watts & sea-level change (eustasy). Any estimate derived from con- Steckler, 1979). However, recent analysis of the age distri- tinental or continental margin data is necessarily a combi- bution of ocean £oor suggests that there may have been nation of both eustatic and tectonic changes, and is also no change in spreading rates for the last180 Myr, and thus, impacted by local or regional sedimentary processes and no related sea-level change (Rowley, 2002). Although this their climatic controls (e.g., Sloss, 1963; Bond, 1979; Watts does not eliminate other contributions to ocean volume & Steckler, 1979; Posamentier et al., 1988). Proxies, such as change, estimates by Harrison (1990) suggest that the pri- oxygen isotopes, can be used to estimate the volume of mary control on long-term eustasy was mid-ocean ridge water sequestered as glacial ice (Miller et al., 1987), but this volumes. Backstripping of the Cenozoic section from signal is overprinted by variations in temperature and, to a New Jersey (Kominz etal.,1998) indicates a relatively small, lesser extent, salinity (Miller, 2002). Estimates of eustasy but signi¢cant, long-term Cenozoic sea-level fall. Because from variations in the changing volume of the oceans, in- this record did not include the entireCretaceous sea-level cluding ridge volumes, sediment volumes, large igneous rise, Kominz et al. (1998) suggested that the magnitude of provinces, continent^continent collision and continental long-term sea-level fall was underestimated. The two ad- extension (e.g., Harrison, 1990; Larson, 1991) are compli- ditional boreholes analysed here were drilled into theLate cated by the fact that subduction removes increasingly Cretaceous in part to determine whether backstripping large portions of the data as estimates range towards ear- would support the larger- or smaller-magnitude estimates lier times (e.g., Kominz,1984). of long-term sea-level change. Sea-level change occurs in a cyclic, but generally not Backstripping of the New Jersey coastal plain sediments periodic, manner on various time scales (e.g., Vail et al., also allows us to estimate the magnitude of the equally 1977). The magnitude of long-term (50^200-Myr controversial third-order (about a half to three millionyear duration) variations has recently become controversial. duration) sea-level changes. Sea-level estimates based on sequence stratigraphic data (e.g., Haq et al., 1987) are con- 1 Present address: Polaris Energy Inc., 180 W.Michigan Avenue, troversial both because of the proprietary nature of the Suite 508, Jackson, MI 49201, USA. Correspondence: Michelle A. Kominz, Deptartment of Geos- data on which the estimates were based and because of ciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, limitations of the method (e.g., Miall, 1986, 1992; Chris- USA. E-mail: [email protected] tie-Blick & Driscoll, 1995). Finally, sequence stratigraphic r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 451 W. A. Van Sic kel et al. data suggest that some very large magnitude third-order su⁄cient £exural rigidity for o¡shore sediments that ¢lled sea-level changes of 100 m or more occurred (Haq et al., the thermally subsiding margin to generate accommoda- 1987).The onlyknown mechanism for such large, rapid eu- tion landward of the actively stretched crust (Watts, 1981; static variations is continental glaciation (e.g., Pitman & Steckler et al., 1999). The resulting coastal plain consists Golovchenko,1991). As such, these events are particularly of Lower Cretaceous to Holocene strata that dip gently problematic when theyoccurduring greenhouse climates, seaward and thicken down-dip (Olsson et al., 1988). Low- such as the Late Cretaceous. Thus, this is an important stand systems tracts are generally absent on the coastal time period in which to determine the magnitude of sea- plain so that sequences represent stacked transgressive level change. Backstripping of Cenozoic New Jersey coast- and highstand systems tracts (Miller et al., 1998b). al plain strata (Kominz et al., 1998) previously indicated that the magnitude of sea-level change was roughly half that estimated by the Haq et al. (1987) method. Testing for BACKSTRIPPING METHOD a eustatic origin requires that estimates of the sea-level magnitude be obtained at multiple locations.The New Jer- Backstripping is a quantitative method of estimating tec- sey boreholes provide overlapping middle Eocene tonic subsidence, which is de¢ned as the vertical move- ( 45 Ma) through late Miocene ( 7 Ma) data. Two new ment of basement in the absence of both sediment boreholes drilled at Ancora and Bass River, New Jersey loading and sea-level change (Watts & Ryan, 1976). We provide overlapping data and extend from the LateCretac- apply a one-dimensional analysis and assume an Airy iso- eous through middle Miocene. If third-order sea-level static response to loads (e.g., Bond et al., 1989).The calcu- variations are consistentwithin this data set, local tecton- lation of basement subsidence inwater,R1(also called ¢rst ism can be eliminated as a mechanism for relative sea-level reduction or accommodation), is a modi¢cation of the change. general backstripping equation of Steckler & Watts (1978): r R1 ¼ TS þ DSL a r À r REGIONAL SETTING a w à ra À rSà Two new boreholes, Bass River and Ancora (Fig. 1), ¼ S þ WD ð1Þ r À r were drilled by the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) a w as Leg 174AX (Miller et al., 1998a, 1999a). These sites where TS is tectonic subsidence, DSL is eustatic sea-level targeted Cretaceous sections beneath the New Jersey change, Sn is decompacted sediment thickness, WD is coastal plain. paleodepth and ra and rw are the density of the asthenso- The New Jersey coastal plain forms the western margin sphere(3.18 g cmÀ 3 at1300 1C) and seawater (1.03 g cm À 3), of the Baltimore CanyonTrough, a large sedimentary basin respectively.The ¢rst reduction (R1) removes the e¡ects of that underlies the continental shelf along the middle sediment loading and compaction, producing curves that Atlantic, east coast of the United States (Grow & Sheridan, are an approximation of the subsidence that would have 1988). This basin formed as a result of LateTriassic^Early occurred if the basin had subsided in water without Jurassic rifting between North America and Africa (Grow sediment deposition (Bond et al., 1989). R1 includes & Sheridan, 1988). By Cretaceous time, the crust attained both tectonic subsidence and eustatic sea-level change. 76 75 74 73 72 W Fig. 1. Location map of New Jersey 41 N coastal plain boreholes and wells used in this study,including Ocean Drilling Pre-Cretaceous Program Leg150X (Island Beach, outcrop N Atlantic City,and Cape May) and Leg Onshore ODP sites 174AX (Bass River and Ancora) sites.The Cretaceous from legs 150X and USGS wells (Butler Place and Island outcrop 174AX Beach #33-01031) were used in conjunction with the Island Beach Cenozoic USGS wells outcrop 40 borehole and the o¡shore Cost B-2 well to Butler Place Island Beach #33-01031 estimate compaction of sand and mud. The USGS Clayton and Island Beach BassRiver Island Beach Clayton Ancora Atlantic Ocean wells were used to estimate thicknesses and lithologies beneath the Bass River and Ancora boreholes.The Baltimore Atlantic City CanyonTrough (grey,o¡-shore shading) is Cost B-2 Baltimore a Mesozoic^Cenozoic sedimentary basin, Canyon 39 which continues to the northeast and Cape May Trough 0 50 km to the south beyond the boundaries of this map. 452 r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Basin Research, 16,451^465 Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic sea-level estimates Estimation of Sn requires the assumption of compaction Porosity (%) rates. Ideally, compaction is based on porosity estimates 0 20 40 60 80 100 from the wells or boreholes in the region of the study, as 0 is the case here. Seaward of the coastal plain, thermal subsidence and se- diment loading dominated accommodation (Steckleretal., 1 1988). The £exural response of the adjacent, unstretched crust generated su⁄cient accommodation onshore for se- diment accumulation, thus forming the coastal plain.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 30. Latest Oligocene Through Early Miocene Isotopic Stratigraphy
    Shackleton, N.J., Curry, W.B., Richter, C., and Bralower, T.J. (Eds.), 1997 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 154 30. LATEST OLIGOCENE THROUGH EARLY MIOCENE ISOTOPIC STRATIGRAPHY AND DEEP-WATER PALEOCEANOGRAPHY OF THE WESTERN EQUATORIAL ATLANTIC: SITES 926 AND 9291 B.P. Flower,2 J.C. Zachos,2 and E. Martin3 ABSTRACT Stable isotopic (d18O and d13C) and strontium isotopic (87Sr/86Sr) data generated from Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Sites 926 and 929 on Ceara Rise provide a detailed chemostratigraphy for the latest Oligocene through early Miocene of the western Equatorial Atlantic. Oxygen isotopic data based on the benthic foraminifer Cibicidoides mundulus exhibit four distinct d18O excursions of more than 0.5ä, including event Mi1 near the Oligocene/Miocene boundary from 23.9 to 22.9 Ma and increases at about 21.5, 18 and 16.5 Ma, probably reßecting episodes of early Miocene Antarctic glaciation events (Mi1a, Mi1b, and Mi2). Carbon isotopic data exhibit well-known d13C increases near the Oligocene/Miocene boundary (~23.8 to 22.6 Ma) and near the early/middle Miocene boundary (~17.5 to 16 Ma). Strontium isotopic data reveal an unconformity in the Hole 926A sequence at about 304 meters below sea ßoor (mbsf); no such unconformity is observed at Site 929. The age of the unconfor- mity is estimated as 17.9 to 16.3 Ma based on a magnetostratigraphic calibration of the 87Sr/86Sr seawater curve, and as 17.4 to 15.8 Ma based on a biostratigraphic calibration. Shipboard biostratigraphic data are more consistent with the biostratigraphic calibration.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced El Niño–Southern Oscillation During the Last Glacial
    RESEARCH | REPORTS PALEOCEANOGRAPHY vergent results and our newly generated data by considering geographic location, choice of fora- minifera species, and changes in thermocline – depth (see supplementary materials). Reduced El Niño Southern Oscillation ENSO variability is asymmetric (the El Niño warm phase is more extreme than the La Niña during the Last Glacial Maximum cold phase) (14), so temperature variations in the equatorial Pacific are not normally distrib- Heather L. Ford,1,2* A. Christina Ravelo,1 Pratigya J. Polissar2 uted (7, 15), and statistical tests that assume normality (e.g., standard deviation) can lead to El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a major source of global interannual variability, but erroneous conclusions with respect to changes its response to climate change is uncertain. Paleoclimate records from the Last Glacial in variance. Therefore, we use quantile-quantile Maximum (LGM) provide insight into ENSO behavior when global boundary conditions (Q-Q) plots—a simple, yet powerful way to vi- — (ice sheet extent, atmospheric partial pressure of CO2) were different from those today. sualize distribution data to compare the tem- In this work, we reconstruct LGM temperature variability at equatorial Pacific sites perature range and distribution recorded by two using measurements of individual planktonic foraminifera shells. A deep equatorial populations of individual foraminifera shells to thermocline altered the dynamics in the eastern equatorial cold tongue, resulting in interpret possible climate forcing mechanisms. reduced ENSO variability during the LGM compared to the Late Holocene. These results Sensitivity studies using modern hydrographic suggest that ENSO was not tied directly to the east-west temperature gradient, as data show how changes in ENSO and seasonality previously suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit Specimen List FLORIDA SUBMERGED the Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (145 to 34 Million Years Ago) PARADISE ISLAND
    Exhibit Specimen List FLORIDA SUBMERGED The Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (145 to 34 million years ago) FLORIDA FORMATIONS Avon Park Formation, Dolostone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; with echinoid sand dollar fossil (Periarchus lyelli); specimen from Florida Geological Survey Avon Park Formation, Limestone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; with organic layers containing seagrass remains from formation in shallow marine environment; specimen from Florida Geological Survey Ocala Limestone (Upper), Limestone from Eocene time; Jackson County, Florida; with foraminifera; specimen from Florida Geological Survey Ocala Limestone (Lower), Limestone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; specimens from Tanner Collection OTHER Anhydrite, Evaporite from early Cenozoic time; Unknown location, Florida; from subsurface core, showing evaporite sequence, older than Avon Park Formation; specimen from Florida Geological Survey FOSSILS Tethyan Gastropod Fossil, (Velates floridanus); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Barge Canal spoil island, Levy County, Florida; specimen from Tanner Collection Echinoid Sea Biscuit Fossils, (Eupatagus antillarum); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Barge Canal spoil island, Levy County, Florida; specimens from Tanner Collection Echinoid Sea Biscuit Fossils, (Eupatagus antillarum); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Mouth of Withlacoochee River, Levy County, Florida; specimens from John Sacha Collection PARADISE ISLAND The Oligocene (34 to 23 million years ago) FLORIDA FORMATIONS Suwannee
    [Show full text]
  • PALEOGENE FOSSILS and the RADIATION of MODERN BIRDS HQ F
    The Auk 122(4):1049–1054, 2005 © The American Ornithologists’ Union, 2005. Printed in USA. OVERVIEW PALEOGENE FOSSILS AND THE RADIATION OF MODERN BIRDS Hq F. Jrx1 Division of Birds, MRC-116, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, USA M birds arose mainly in 1989, Mayr and Manegold 2004), and others. the Neogene Period (1.8–23.8 mya), and mod- Paleogene fossils also document diverse extinct ern species mainly in the Plio-Pleistocene branches of the neornithine tree, ranging from (0.08–5.3 mya). Neogene fossil birds generally large pseudotoothed seabirds to giant fl ightless resemble modern taxa, and those that cannot land birds to small zygodactyl perching birds be a ributed to a modern genus or species (Ballmann 1969, Harrison and Walker 1976, can usually be placed in a modern family with Andors 1992). a fair degree of confi dence (e.g. Becker 1987, Before the Paleogene, fossils of putative neor- Olson and Rasmussen 2001). Fossil birds from nithine birds are sparse and fragmentary (Hope earlier in the Cenozoic can be more challeng- 2002), and their phylogenetic placement is all ing to classify. The fossil birds of the Paleogene the more equivocal. The Paleogene is thus a cru- (23.8–65.5 mya) are clearly a ributable to the cial time period for understanding the history of Neornithes (modern birds), and the earliest diversifi cation of birds, particularly with respect well-established records of most traditional to the deeper branches of the neornithine tree. orders and families of modern birds occur then.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Time Scale Is the Eon
    Exploring Geologic Time Poster Illustrated Teacher's Guide #35-1145 Paper #35-1146 Laminated Background Geologic Time Scale Basics The history of the Earth covers a vast expanse of time, so scientists divide it into smaller sections that are associ- ated with particular events that have occurred in the past.The approximate time range of each time span is shown on the poster.The largest time span of the geologic time scale is the eon. It is an indefinitely long period of time that contains at least two eras. Geologic time is divided into two eons.The more ancient eon is called the Precambrian, and the more recent is the Phanerozoic. Each eon is subdivided into smaller spans called eras.The Precambrian eon is divided from most ancient into the Hadean era, Archean era, and Proterozoic era. See Figure 1. Precambrian Eon Proterozoic Era 2500 - 550 million years ago Archaean Era 3800 - 2500 million years ago Hadean Era 4600 - 3800 million years ago Figure 1. Eras of the Precambrian Eon Single-celled and simple multicelled organisms first developed during the Precambrian eon. There are many fos- sils from this time because the sea-dwelling creatures were trapped in sediments and preserved. The Phanerozoic eon is subdivided into three eras – the Paleozoic era, Mesozoic era, and Cenozoic era. An era is often divided into several smaller time spans called periods. For example, the Paleozoic era is divided into the Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous,and Permian periods. Paleozoic Era Permian Period 300 - 250 million years ago Carboniferous Period 350 - 300 million years ago Devonian Period 400 - 350 million years ago Silurian Period 450 - 400 million years ago Ordovician Period 500 - 450 million years ago Cambrian Period 550 - 500 million years ago Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cenozoic Era - Nýlífsöld 65 MY-Present Jarðsaga 2 Ólafur Ingólfsson Origin of the Term: the Tertiary Tertiary System
    The Cenozoic Era - Nýlífsöld 65 MY-Present Jarðsaga 2 Ólafur Ingólfsson Origin of the Term: The Tertiary Tertiary System. [1760] Named by Giovanni Arduino Period as the uppermost part of his 65-1.8 MY three-fold subdivision of mountains in northern Italy. The Tertiary became a formal period and system when Lyell published his work describing further subdivisions of the Tertiary. The Tertiary Period is divided into five epochs (tímar): Paleocene (65-56 MY), Eocene (56-34 MY), Oligocene (34-24 MY), Miocene (24-5,3 MY), and Pliocene (5,3-1,8 MY). Confusing set of stratigraphic terms... More than 95% of the Cenozoic era belongs to the Tertiary period. During the 18th century the names Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary were given by Giovanni Arduino to successive rock strata, the Primary being the oldest, the Tertiary the more recent. In 1829 a fourth division, the Quaternary, was added by P. G. Desnoyers. These terms were later abandoned, the Primary becoming the Paleozoic Era, and the Secondary the Mesozoic. But Tertiary and Quaternary were retained for the two main stages of the Cenozoic. Attempts to replace the "Tertiary" with a more reasonable division of “Palaeogene” (early Tertiary) and “Neogene” (later Tertiary and Quaternary) have not been very successful. Stanley uses this division. The World at the K/T Boundary Paleocene plate tectonics During the Paleocene, the inland seas of the Cretaceous Period dry up, exposing large land areas in North America and Eurasia. Australia begins to separate from Antarctica, and Greenland splits from North America. A remnant Tethys Sea persists in the equatorial region.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Data Report: Paleocene-Early Oligocene Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy, Odp Leg 198 Sites 1209, 1210, and 1211 (Shatsk
    Bralower, T.J., Premoli Silva, I., and Malone, M.J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results Volume 198 3. DATA REPORT: PALEOCENE–EARLY OLIGOCENE CALCAREOUS NANNOFOSSIL BIOSTRATIGRAPHY, ODP LEG 198 SITES 1209, 1210, AND 1211 (SHATSKY RISE, PACIFIC OCEAN)1 Timothy J. Bralower2 ABSTRACT A relatively complete lower Paleocene to lower Oligocene sequence was recovered from the Southern High of Shatsky Rise at Sites 1209, 1210, and 1211. The sequence consists of nannofossil ooze and clay- rich nannofossil ooze. Samples from these sites have been the target of intensive calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphic investigations. Calcar- 1Bralower, T.J., 2005. Data report: eous nannofossils are moderately preserved in most of the recovered se- Paleocene–early Oligocene calcareous quence, which extends from nannofossil Zones CP1 to CP16. Most nannofossil biostratigraphy, ODP Leg traditional zonal markers are present; however, the rarity and poor pres- 198 Sites 1209, 1210, and 1211 ervation of key species in the uppermost Paleocene and lower Eocene (Shatsky Rise, Pacific Ocean). In inhibits zonal subdivision of part of this sequence. Bralower, T.J., Premoli Silva, I., and Malone, M.J. (Eds.), Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, 198, 1–15 [Online]. Available from World Wide Web: <http:// INTRODUCTION www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/ 198_SR/VOLUME/CHAPTERS/ Ocean Drilling Program Leg 198 addresses the causes and conse- 115.PDF>. [Cited YYYY-MM-DD] 2 quences of Cretaceous and Paleogene global warmth. Eight sites were Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, drilled along a broad depth transect on Shatsky Rise, a medium-sized University Park PA 16802, USA. large igneous province in the west-central Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Thalassinidea, Brachyura) from Puerto Rico, United States Territory
    Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, no. 34 (2008), p. 1–15, 6 figs., 1 table. © 2008, Mizunami Fossil Museum New Cretaceous and Cenozoic Decapoda (Crustacea: Thalassinidea, Brachyura) from Puerto Rico, United States Territory Carrie E. Schweitzer1, Jorge Velez-Juarbe2, Michael Martinez3, Angela Collmar Hull1, 4, Rodney M. Feldmann4, and Hernan Santos2 1)Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, Ohio, 44720, USA <[email protected]> 2)Department of Geology, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus, P. O. Box 9017, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, 00681 United States Territory <[email protected]> 3)College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, 140 7th Ave. South, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, USA <[email protected]> 4)Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA <[email protected]> Abstract A large number of recently collected specimens from Puerto Rico has yielded two new species including Palaeoxanthopsis tylotus and Eurytium granulosum, the oldest known occurrence of the latter genus. Cretaceous decapods are reported from Puerto Rico for the first time, and the Cretaceous fauna is similar to that of southern Mexico. Herein is included the first report of Pleistocene decapods from Puerto Rico, which were previously known from other Caribbean localities. The Pleistocene Cardisoma guanhumi is a freshwater crab of the family Gecarcinidae. The freshwater crab families have a poor fossil record; thus, the occurrence is noteworthy and may document dispersal of the crab by humans. Key words: Decapoda, Thalassinidea, Brachyura, Puerto Rico, Cretaceous, Paleogene, Neogene. Introduction than Eocene are not separated by these fault zones and even overlie parts of the fault zones in some areas (Jolly et al., 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusks and a Crustacean from Early Oligocene Methane-Seep Deposits in the Talara Basin, Northern Peru
    Mollusks and a crustacean from early Oligocene methane-seep deposits in the Talara Basin, northern Peru STEFFEN KIEL, FRIDA HYBERTSEN, MATÚŠ HYŽNÝ, and ADIËL A. KLOMPMAKER Kiel, S., Hybertsen, F., Hyžný, M., and Klompmaker, A.A. 2020. Mollusks and a crustacean from early Oligocene methane- seep deposits in the Talara Basin, northern Peru. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 65 (1): 109–138. A total of 25 species of mollusks and crustaceans are reported from Oligocene seep deposits in the Talara Basin in north- ern Peru. Among these, 12 are identified to the species-level, including one new genus, six new species, and three new combinations. Pseudophopsis is introduced for medium-sized, elongate-oval kalenterid bivalves with a strong hinge plate and largely reduced hinge teeth, rough surface sculpture and lacking a pallial sinus. The new species include two bivalves, three gastropods, and one decapod crustacean: the protobranch bivalve Neilo altamirano and the vesicomyid bivalve Pleurophopsis talarensis; among the gastropods, the pyropeltid Pyropelta seca, the provannid Provanna pelada, and the hokkaidoconchid Ascheria salina; the new crustacean is the callianassid Eucalliax capsulasetaea. New combina- tions include the bivalves Conchocele tessaria, Lucinoma zapotalensis, and Pseudophopsis peruviana. Two species are shared with late Eocene to Oligocene seep faunas in Washington state, USA: Provanna antiqua and Colus sekiuensis; the Talara Basin fauna shares only genera, but no species with Oligocene seep fauna in other regions. Further noteworthy aspects of the molluscan fauna include the remarkable diversity of four limpet species, the oldest record of the cocculinid Coccopigya, and the youngest record of the largely seep-restricted genus Ascheria.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorking the Bottle: What Triggered the Paleocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum Methane Release? Miriame
    PALEOCEANOGRAPHY, VOL. 16, NO. 6, PAGES 549-562, DECEMBER 2001 Uncorking the bottle: What triggered the Paleocene/Eocene thermal maximum methane release? MiriamE. Katz,• BenjaminS. Cramer,Gregory S. Mountain,2 Samuel Katz, 3 and KennethG. Miller,1,2 Abstract. The Paleocene/Eocenethermal maximum (PETM) was a time of rapid global warming in both marine and continentalrealms that has been attributed to a massivemethane (CH4) releasefrom marine gas hydrate reservoirs. Previously proposedmechanisms for thismethane release rely on a changein deepwatersource region(s) to increasewater temperatures rapidly enoughto trigger the massivethermal dissociationof gas hydratereservoirs beneath the seafloor.To establish constraintson thermaldissociation, we modelheat flow throughthe sedimentcolumn and showthe effectof the temperature changeon the gashydrate stability zone throughtime. In addition,we provideseismic evidence tied to boreholedata for methanerelease along portions of the U.S. continentalslope; the releasesites are proximalto a buriedMesozoic reef front. Our modelresults, release site locations, published isotopic records, and oceancirculation models neither confirm nor refute thermaldissociation as the triggerfor the PETM methanerelease. In the absenceof definitiveevidence to confirmthermal dissociation,we investigatean altemativehypothesis in which continentalslope failure resulted in a catastrophicmethane release.Seismic and isotopic evidence indicates that Antarctic source deepwater circulation and seafloor erosion caused slope retreatalong
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Minerals at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Interpretations, Limits, and Perspectives
    minerals Review Clay Minerals at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Interpretations, Limits, and Perspectives Fabio Tateo Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGG-CNR) Padova, c/o Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, Via Gradenigo 6, I-35131 Padova, Italy; [email protected] Received: 20 October 2020; Accepted: 26 November 2020; Published: 30 November 2020 Abstract: The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) was an “extreme” episode of environmental stress that affected the Earth in the past, and it has numerous affinities concerning the rapid increase in the greenhouse effect. It has left several biological, compositional, and sedimentary facies footprints in sedimentary records. Clay minerals are frequently used to decipher environmental effects because they represent their source areas, essentially in terms of climatic conditions and of transport mechanisms (a more or less fast travel, from the bedrocks to the final site of recovery). Clay mineral variations at the PETM have been studied by several authors in terms of climatic and provenance indicators, but also as tracers of more complicated interplay among different factors requiring integrated interpretation (facies sorting, marine circulation, wind transport, early diagenesis, etc.). Clay minerals were also believed to play a role in the recovery of pre-episode climatic conditions after the PETM exordium, by becoming a sink of atmospheric CO2 that is considered a necessary step to switch off the greenhouse hyperthermal effect. This review aims to consider the use of clay minerals made by different authors to study the effects of the PETM and their possible role as effective (simple) proxy tools for environmental reconstructions.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE V
    GSA GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE v. 4.0 CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST HIST. ANOM. (Ma) ANOM. CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 66.0 541 CALABRIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE* 1.8 31 C31 MAASTRICHTIAN 252 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 Lopin- 254 32 C32 72.1 635 2A C2A PIACENZIAN WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 3.6 gian 33 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN CAPITANIAN NEOPRO- 5 C3 CAMPANIAN Guada- 265 750 CRYOGENIAN 5.3 80 C33 WORDIAN TEROZOIC 3A MESSINIAN LATE lupian 269 C3A 83.6 ROADIAN 272 850 7.2 SANTONIAN 4 KUNGURIAN C4 86.3 279 TONIAN CONIACIAN 280 4A Cisura- C4A TORTONIAN 90 89.8 1000 1000 PERMIAN ARTINSKIAN 10 5 TURONIAN lian C5 93.9 290 SAKMARIAN STENIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 296 SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 ASSELIAN 299 5A 100 100 300 GZHELIAN 1200 C5A 13.8 LATE 304 KASIMOVIAN 307 1250 MESOPRO- 15 LANGHIAN ECTASIAN 5B C5B ALBIAN MIDDLE MOSCOVIAN 16.0 TEROZOIC 5C C5C 110 VANIAN 315 PENNSYL- 1400 EARLY 5D C5D MIOCENE 113 320 BASHKIRIAN 323 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 1500 CALYMMIAN 6 C6 APTIAN LATE 20 120 331 6A C6A 20.4 EARLY 1600 M0r 126 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 MIDDLE VISEAN MISSIS- M3 BARREMIAN SIPPIAN STATHERIAN C6C 23.0 6C 130 M5 CRETACEOUS 131 347 1750 HAUTERIVIAN 7 C7 CARBONIFEROUS EARLY TOURNAISIAN 1800 M10 134 25 7A C7A 359 8 C8 CHATTIAN VALANGINIAN M12 360 140 M14 139 FAMENNIAN OROSIRIAN 9 C9 M16 28.1 M18 BERRIASIAN 2000 PROTEROZOIC 10 C10 LATE
    [Show full text]