Eu Enlargement and Regional Cooperation – Identifying the Next Steps

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eu Enlargement and Regional Cooperation – Identifying the Next Steps EU ENLARGEMENT AND REGIONAL COOPERATION – IDENTIFYING THE NEXT STEPS Valeska Esch Carina Kempf (eds.) In cooperation with: The Aspen Institute Germany wishes sincerely to thank the German Federal Foreign Office for its sponsorship of the Aspen Southeast Europe Program 2015 through the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe. The mission of The Aspen Institute is to improve the quality of leadership through dialog about the values and ideals essential to meeting the challenges facing organizations and governments at all levels. Over its sixty year history, the Aspen Institute has been devoted to advancing values-based leadership – to creating a safe, neutral space in which leaders can meet in order to discuss the complex challenges facing modern societies confidentially and in depth, with respect for differing points of view, in a search for common ground. This reader includes conference papers and proceedings of Aspen Germany’s conferences in 2015. The Aspen Institute’s role is limited to that of an organizer and convener. Aspen takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. or German governments. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion contained in all Aspen publications are the sole responsibility of the author or authors. For further information about The Aspen Institute, please write Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V., Friedrichstraße 60, 10117 Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany or call at +49 30 80 48 90 0. Visit our website at www.aspeninstitute.de Copyright © 2016 by The Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V. All rights reserved. This report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and excerpts by reviewers for the public press), without the express, prior, written consent of the publisher. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY DR. ERNST REICHEL, SPECIAL ENVOY FOR SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE, TURKEY AND THE EFTA STATES, GERMAN FEDERAL FOREIGN OFFICE 07 INTRODUCTION 09 SUMMARY 11 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS 13 SYNOPSIS – DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN THE WESTERN BALKANS 15 SYNOPSIS – REGIONAL COOPERATION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS 21 CONFERENCE I: DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN THE WESTERN BALKANS 27 AGENDA AND PARTICIPANTS 30 PARTICIPANT BIOGRAPHIES 36 CONFERENCE REPORT 47 SESSION I: DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN THE WESTERN BALKANS – GENERAL ASSESSMENT 53 1. Arolda Elbasani 53 Shallow Europeanization: Top-Down Conditionality, Formal Compliance, and Sources of State Capture in the Balkans 2. Paula M. Pickering 60 Challenges to Strengthening Civil Society in the Western Balkans SESSION II: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM 66 3. Tobias Flessenkemper 66 European Union Integration and Public Administration Reform TABLE OF CONTENTS SESSION III: DEPOLITICIZATION AND INDEPENDENCE OF STATE INSTITUTIONS AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE 69 4. Milena Milošević 69 Impediments to Depoliticization in the Western Balkans: The Case of Montenegro 5. Arberësha Loxha 74 The Integrity of Kosovo’s Administration and Policy Steps for Depoliticization 6. Dane Taleski 78 Predicaments of Political Divisions in Southeast Europe: How to Escape Destructive Polarization? SESSION IV: THE ROLE OF PARLIAMENT 84 7. Emil Atanasovski 84 Challenges in Western Balkan Parliaments – The Need for a Shift in the Classic Parliamentary Oversight Paradigm 8. Bodo Weber 89 Parliamentarianism in the Western Balkans – Authoritarian Legacies and the Impact of EU Integration CONFERENCE II: REGIONAL COOPERATION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS 93 AGENDA AND PARTICIPANTS 94 PARTICIPANT BIOGRAPHIES 100 CONFERENCE REPORT 111 SESSION I: THE STATE OF REGIONAL COOPERATION AND REMAINING CHALLENGES 115 1. Vedran Džihić 115 Civil Society in the Framework of the Berlin Process: Game Changer or More of the Same? 2. Jelica Minić 118 The State of Regional Cooperation and Remaining Challenges 3. Aleksandar Andrija Pejović 125 The State of Regional Cooperation and Remaining Challenges 4. Senada Šelo Šabić 129 Fostering Reforms in the Western Balkans – Fighting Corruption as an Important Milestone 5. Dane Taleski 133 Civil Society Forum at the Vienna Summit: Between High Expectations and Modest Achievements TABLE OF CONTENTS SESSION II: REGIONAL SECURITY COOPERATION 137 6. Vesna Bojičić-Dželilović 137 Taking Responsibility for Regional Cooperation in the Western Balkans Seriously: What is at Stake? 7. Sidita Kushi 142 Combating a Shared Menace: Terrorism as a Security and Social Threat in the Western Balkans and Beyond 8. Ioannis Michaletos 149 Regional Security Cooperation in Southeast Europe 9. Florian Qehaja 159 Uneven Regional Security Cooperation: Lessons Learned and Next Steps SESSION III: REGIONAL ECONOMIC COOPERATION, ENERGY SECURITY, AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 163 10. Jens Bastian 163 Regional Economic Cooperation and Energy Security in South East Europe 11. Blerim Reka 168 The Energy Security Challenges of the Western Balkans: TAP vs. Turkish Stream CONFERENCE III: ASPEN WORKING GROUP SOUTHEAST EUROPE 173 AGENDA AND PARTICIPANTS 174 PARTICIPANT BIOGRAPHIES 176 REPORT WORKING GROUP 181 ACRONYMS USED 184 ABOUT ASPEN 187 FOREWORD 2015 was an eventful, difficult year for the world, for Europe and for the Western Balkans. At the start of the year, no one could have imagined how migration through the countries of the Western Balkans would surge over the year, or what challenges the governments of the transit countries would face as a result. Now, at the beginning of 2016, I am happy to say that the achievements of these countries along the Western Balkan route in meeting this humanitarian challenge have been remarkable. Let me take this opportunity to express my profound appreciation for their endeavors. The real subject of this foreword, however, is events in the Western Balkans, events which are not so spectacular in the public eye as the migration issue but which are no less important. It is a matter of dismantling the burdens left by mal- functioning social systems in all states of the region, and also of removing the causes and managing the consequences of the terrible wars in the former Yugoslavia towards the end of the 20th century. The Aspen Institute Germany, which helps to resolve old conflicts and supports the countries of the region in moving towards the Euro-Atlantic structures, makes a valuable contribution to this crucial task. One of its now renowned formats is the “subcabinet meetings” supported by the Federal Foreign Office, which serve as a platform for a confidential, trust- based exchange among decision-makers below cabinet level. In 2015, this conference series looked in particular at public administration reform and regional cooperation. Both issues are extremely important for the Western Balkans, as effi- cient, transparent public administration is key to a modern state, and regional cooperation is not only essential for the welfare of all its immediate neighbors but also constitutes one of the central elements for integration into the European Union, to which the countries of the region aspire. In 2015 the Aspen Institute Germany again organized conferences at the political level, which attracted considerable attention and respect both in Europe and beyond. The “flagship”, of course, was the Seventh Southeast Europe Foreign Ministers’ Conference in Berlin in November. Traditionally this conference provides an opportunity for participants, including all the region’s foreign ministers, to engage in a confidential exchange of views, but also, in the public pro- gram, to highlight issues of topical significance for the region. Experience has shown that the various states are making the necessary progress at different rates; sometimes they hit a spell of stagnation, and occasionally there are even setbacks. Nevertheless, as long as all stakeholders are working to- wards the major goal, set forth in the Thessaloniki Declaration, of consistently moving closer to the European Union, we do not need to be fearful for the idea of Europe in this part of the continent. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Aspen Institute Germany and its staff for their untiring work and to wish them every success and all the very best for 2016. Dr. Ernst Reichel, Ambassador Special Envoy for South-Eastern Europe, Turkey and the EFTA States Federal Foreign Office INTRODUCTION Dear friends of the Aspen Institute Germany, The Aspen Institute Germany has been committed to providing a confidential and neutral platform for debate. In a closed and protected environment, off-the-record meetings are organized to allow for in-depth discussions that respect different points of views. Leaders of the Western Balkan countries have embraced this opportunity and have come together at the Aspen Institute Germany’s conferences to discuss regional challenges and current issues their countries are facing. These conferences facilitate in-depth discussions regionally and with German, European, and U.S. decision-makers and experts, as well as representatives from the EU and international organizations. The aim of these conferences is to find common ground with regard to regional challenges and to develop concrete policy recommendations and mutually beneficial solu- tions. International experts from academia and civil society organizations provide valuable input to these meetings with the papers and insights they contribute to the discussions. The region has come a long way since the violent break-up of the former
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2017-2018
    US Governor Philip D. Murphy (New Jersey) Annette Riedel, Senior Editor, Deutschlandfunk Kultur Berlin Transatlantic Forum 2018: “Present at the New Creation? Tech. Power. Democracy.” October 16, 2018 3 4 PREFACE Dear Friends of Aspen Germany, In 2017, we also had three US mayors in quick succession as guests of Aspen Germany: Mayor Pete Buttigieg of 2017 and 2018 were years of world-wide political and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles, economic changes. The international order, established and Mayor Rahm Emanuel from Chicago. All three events 70 years ago under US leadership after World War II, is attracted high-ranking transatlanticists from the Bundestag, now being challenged by the rise of populism, the rise of think tanks, and political foundations as well as business authoritarian regimes from Russia, China, Turkey, and representatives. The goal of these events was to facilitate a fundamental changes in US policy under President Donald transatlantic discussion about the future course of the Trump. United States after Trump’s election. In the last two years, we have seen an erosion in the core of Throughout both years, we have also continued our our transatlantic alliance. From NATO and our common transatlantic exchange programs. The Bundestag and security interests to our trade relations, from our approach &RQJUHVV6WD൵HUV([FKDQJH3URJUDPEURXJKWVWD൵HUVIURP to climate change to arms control – everything we have WKH86&RQJUHVVWR%HUOLQDQGVWD൵HUVIURPWKH*HUPDQ taken for granted as a stable framework of transatlantic Bundestag to Washington, D.C.. Over the years, we have relations is now being questioned. These dramatic changes built a robust network of young American and German did not go unnoticed by us.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Country Report BTI 2014
    BTI 2014 | Montenegro Country Report Status Index 1-10 7.50 # 22 of 129 Political Transformation 1-10 7.90 # 23 of 129 Economic Transformation 1-10 7.11 # 28 of 129 Management Index 1-10 6.51 # 18 of 129 scale score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2014. It covers the period from 31 January 2011 to 31 January 2013. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2014 — Montenegro Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2014. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. BTI 2014 | Montenegro 2 Key Indicators Population M 0.6 HDI 0.791 GDP p.c. $ 14206.2 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.1 HDI rank of 187 52 Gini Index 28.6 Life expectancy years 74.5 UN Education Index 0.838 Poverty3 % 0.0 Urban population % 63.5 Gender inequality2 - Aid per capita $ 163.1 Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2013 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2013. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary Preparations for EU accession have dominated the political agenda in Montenegro during the period under review. Recognizing the progress made by the country on seven key priorities identified in its 2010 opinion, the European Commission in October 2011 proposed to start accession negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 17/11815
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 17/11815 17. Wahlperiode 11. 12. 2012 Änderungsantrag der Abgeordneten Burkhard Lischka, Christine Lambrecht, Rainer Arnold, Edelgard Bulmahn, Sebastian Edathy, Petra Ernstberger, Gabriele Fograscher, Dr. Edgar Franke, Martin Gerster, Iris Gleicke, Günter Gloser, Ulrike Gottschalck, Dr. Gregor Gysi, Hans-Joachim Hacker, Michael Hartmann (Wackernheim), Dr. Rosemarie Hein, Dr. Barbara Hendricks, Gustav Herzog, Josip Juratovic, Dr. h. c. Susanne Kastner, Ulrich Kelber, Daniela Kolbe (Leipzig), Niema Movassat, Dr. Rolf Mützenich, Aydan Özog˘uz, Johannes Pflug, Joachim Poß, Dr. Sascha Raabe, Stefan Rebmann, Anton Schaaf, Paul Schäfer (Köln), Marianne Schieder (Schwandorf), Swen Schulz (Spandau), Sonja Steffen, Kerstin Tack, Kathrin Vogler, Heidemarie Wieczorek-Zeul, Waltraud Wolff (Wolmirstedt) zu der zweiten Beratung des Gesetzentwurfs der Bundesregierung – Drucksachen 17/11295, 17/11800, 17/11814 – Entwurf eines Gesetzes über den Umfang der Personensorge bei einer Beschneidung des männlichen Kindes Der Bundestag wolle beschließen: 1. In Artikel 1 wird § 1631d wie folgt geändert: a) Absatz 1 wird wie folgt gefasst: „(1) Die Personensorge umfasst auch das Recht, nach vorangegangener ärztlicher Aufklärung in eine medizinisch nicht erforderliche Beschnei- dung des nicht einsichts- und urteilsfähigen männlichen Kindes einzu- willigen, wenn diese nach den Regeln der ärztlichen Kunst durchgeführt werden soll. Dies gilt nicht, wenn durch die Beschneidung auch unter Be- rücksichtigung ihres Zwecks das Kindeswohl gefährdet
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law in the Western Balkans: ASPEN 5 Exploring the New EU Enlargement Strategy and Necessary Steps Ahead POLICY PROGRAM
    RULE OF LAW IN THE WESTERN BALKANS: EXPLORING THE NEW EU ENLARGEMENT STRATEGY AND NECESSARY STEPS AHEAD April 16-19, 2018 | Alt Madlitz In cooperation with: The Aspen Institute Germany wishes to thank the German Federal Foreign Office for its sponsorship of the Aspen Southeast Europe Program 2018 through the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe. The mission of the Aspen Institute Germany is to improve the quality of leadership through dialog about the values and ideals essential to meeting the challenges facing organizations and governments at all levels. Over its forty-year history, Aspen Germany has been devoted to advancing values-based leadership – to creating a safe, neutral space in which leaders can meet in order to discuss the complex challenges facing modern societies confidentially and in depth, with respect for differing points of view, in a search for common ground. This reader includes conference papers and proceedings of Aspen Germany’s Western Balkans conference in 2018. The Aspen Institute’s role is limited to that of an organizer and convener. Aspen takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. or German governments. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion contained in all Aspen publications are the sole responsibility of the author or authors. For further information about the Aspen Institute Germany, please write to Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V. Friedrichstraße 60 10117 Berlin Germany or call at +49 30 80 48 90 0. Visit us at www.aspeninstitute.de www.facebook.com/AspenDeutschland www.twitter.com/AspenGermany Copyright © 2018 by The Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Vorstände Der Parlamentariergruppen in Der 18. Wahlperiode
    1 Vorstände der Parlamentariergruppen in der 18. Wahlperiode Deutsch-Ägyptische Parlamentariergruppe Vorsitz: Karin Maag (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Dr. h.c. Edelgard Bulmahn (SPD) stv. Vors.: Heike Hänsel (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Dr. Franziska Brantner (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Parlamentariergruppe Arabischsprachige Staaten des Nahen Ostens (Bahrain, Irak, Jemen, Jordanien, Katar, Kuwait, Libanon, Oman, Saudi Arabien, Syrien, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Arbeitsgruppe Palästina) Vorsitz: Michael Hennrich (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Gabriele Groneberg (SPD) stv. Vors.: Heidrun Bluhm (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Luise Amtsberg (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Parlamentariergruppe ASEAN (Brunei, Indonesien, Kambodscha, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippinen, Singapur, Thailand, Vietnam) Vorsitz: Dr. Thomas Gambke (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) stv. Vors.: Dr. Michael Fuchs (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Johann Saathoff (SPD) stv. Vors.: Caren Lay (DIE LINKE.) Deutsch-Australisch-Neuseeländische Parlamentariergruppe (Australien, Neuseeland, Ost-Timor) Vorsitz: Volkmar Klein(CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Rainer Spiering (SPD) stv. Vors.: Cornelia Möhring (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Anja Hajduk (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Deutsch-Baltische Parlamentariergruppe (Estland, Lettland, Litauen) Vorsitz: Alois Karl (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: René Röspel (SPD) stv. Vors.: Dr. Axel Troost (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Dr. Konstantin von Notz (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Deutsch-Belarussische Parlamentariergruppe Vorsitz: Oliver Kaczmarek (SPD) stv. Vors.: Dr. Johann Wadephul (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Andrej Hunko (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: N.N. (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) 2 Deutsch-Belgisch-Luxemburgische Parlamentariergruppe (Belgien, Luxemburg) Vorsitz: Patrick Schnieder (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Dr. Daniela de Ridder (SPD) stv. Vors.: Katrin Werner (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Corinna Rüffer (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Parlamentariergruppe Bosnien und Herzegowina Vorsitz: Marieluise Beck (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) stv.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • RTF Template
    19. Wahlperiode Verteidigungsausschuss Mitteilung Berlin, den 17. Oktober 2019 Die 42. Sitzung des Verteidigungsausschusses Sekretariat findet statt am Telefon: +49 30 227-32537 Fax: +49 30 227-36005 Mittwoch, dem 23. Oktober 2019, 9:00 Uhr Berlin, Paul-Löbe-Haus Sitzungssaal Sitzungssaal: 2.700 Telefon: +49 30 227-30481 Fax: +49 30 227-36481 Handys im Sitzungssaal bitte ausschalten! Tagesordnung Tagesordnungspunkt 1 Allgemeine Bekanntmachungen Tagesordnungspunkt 2 Bericht der Bundesregierung über die Lage Berichterstatter/in: in den Einsatzgebieten der Bundeswehr Abg. Prof. h. c. Dr. Karl A. Lamers [CDU/CSU] Abg. Dr. Fritz Felgentreu [SPD] Abg. Jan Nolte [AfD] Abg. Dr. Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann [FDP] Abg. Dr. Alexander S. Neu/ Abg. Tobias Pflüger [DIE LINKE.] Abg. Dr. Tobias Lindner [BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN] 19. Wahlperiode Seite 1 von 9 Verteidigungsausschuss Tagesordnungspunkt 3 Angelegenheiten der Gemeinsamen Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik in Europa Tagesordnungspunkt 4 Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung Federführend: Ausschuss für Inneres und Heimat Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Modernisierung der Mitberatend: Strukturen des Besoldungsrechts Verteidigungsausschuss und zur Änderung weiterer dienstrechtlicher Haushaltsausschuss (mb und § 96 GO) Vorschriften Gutachtlich: (Besoldungsstrukturenmodernisierungsgesetz - Parlamentarischer Beirat für nachhaltige Entwicklung BesStMG) Berichterstatter/in: Abg. Kerstin Vieregge [CDU/CSU] BT-Drucksache 19/13396 Abg. Dr. Fritz Felgentreu [SPD] Abg. Jan Nolte [AfD] Abg. Dr. Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann [FDP] Abg. Matthias Höhn [DIE LINKE.] Abg. Dr. Tobias Lindner [BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN] Frist für die Abgabe der Voten: 23.10.2019 19. Wahlperiode Tagesordnung Seite 2 von 9 42. Sitzung Verteidigungsausschuss Tagesordnungspunkt 5 Antrag der Abgeordneten Matthias Höhn, Jan Korte, Federführend: Dr. Gesine Lötzsch, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Ausschuss für Inneres und Heimat Fraktion DIE LINKE.
    [Show full text]
  • Gouvernance, Pouvoirs Et Démocratie
    CONSEIL DE L’EUROPE Troisième Université d’été de la démocratie 29 juin-4 juillet 2008 Gouvernance, pouvoirs et démocratie SYNTHÈSE DES SESSIONS PLÉNIÈRES ET DES CONFÉRENCES Direction générale de la démocratie et des affaires politiques Conseil de l’Europe, Strasbourg Les vues exprimées dans cet ouvrage sont de la responsabilité de l’auteur et ne reflètent pas nécessairement la ligne officielle du Conseil de l’Europe. Toute demande de reproduction ou de traduction de tout ou d’une partie du document doit être adressée à la Division de l’information publique et des publications, Direction de la communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex ou [email protected]). Toute autre correspondance relative à cette publication doit être adressée à la Direction générale de la démocratie et des affaires politiques. Contacts au Conseil de l’Europe : Jean-Louis Laurens Directeur général de la démocratie et des affaires politiques Courriel : [email protected] Tél. : + 33 (0)3 88 41 20 73 François Friederich Coordinateur des Ecoles d’Etudes Politiques Courriel : [email protected] Tél. : + 33 (03) 90 21 53 02 Claude Bernard Gestionnaire de programme Courriel : [email protected] Tél. : + 33 (03) 88 41 22 75 Site web : www.coe.int www.coe.int/Schools-Politics/fr © Conseil de l’Europe, janvier 2009 Sommaire Introduction : De l’Université d’été au « Davos de la démocratie » ............5 Chapitre I. Démocratie et enjeux de la gouvernance ....................................7 1. Gouvernance, réflexions autour du concept ..........................................................7 2. Composantes de la bonne gouvernance ..............................................................10 3. Les défis de la bonne gouvernance ......................................................................12 Chapitre II.
    [Show full text]
  • TV and Radio Features, Texts on Portals – a Machine-Retyped Text
    TV and radio features, texts on portals – a machine-retyped text Vijesti TV – 8 October 2018 Power plants being built by Albania on the Cijevna River could be the subject of arbitration According to the information given to Vijesti TV from the non-governmental organization Centre for Protection and Research of Birds of Montenegro (CZIP). The Cijevna River could be left without the living world while the area around that river will be permanently devastated if the planned construction of 14 small hydropower plants within its Albanian section is implemented. It was from non-governmental organizations that the Montenegrin public, as well as the Government of Montenegro learned that the construction of the first of 14 mini power plants began on this river. Since Albania has already violated the Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context due to its omission to inform the neighbouring countries, in the forthcoming period the Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism expects cooperation of the official Tirana and development of an environmental impact assessment study. They believe that there will be no arbitrage and that the problem will be overcome by establishment of a joint committee. MATIJA OTAŠEVIĆ The Centre for Protection and Research of Birds of Montenegro (CZIP), an organization which sent photographs of construction works on the Cijevna River to the Ministry expressed its concerns that the construction of 14 small hydropower plants in the Albanian section of the Cijevna Rijeka could seriously endanger the Montenegrin river ecosystem and leave this river without the living world. KSENIJA MEDENICA, CZIP: "There is an impact on migration, both daily and seasonal when it comes to fish populations.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WARP of the SERBIAN IDENTITY Anti-Westernism, Russophilia, Traditionalism
    HELSINKI COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN SERBIA studies17 THE WARP OF THE SERBIAN IDENTITY anti-westernism, russophilia, traditionalism... BELGRADE, 2016 THE WARP OF THE SERBIAN IDENTITY Anti-westernism, russophilia, traditionalism… Edition: Studies No. 17 Publisher: Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia www.helsinki.org.rs For the publisher: Sonja Biserko Reviewed by: Prof. Dr. Dubravka Stojanović Prof. Dr. Momir Samardžić Dr Hrvoje Klasić Layout and design: Ivan Hrašovec Printed by: Grafiprof, Belgrade Circulation: 200 ISBN 978-86-7208-203-6 This publication is a part of the project “Serbian Identity in the 21st Century” implemented with the assistance from the Open Society Foundation – Serbia. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Open Society Foundation – Serbia. CONTENTS Publisher’s Note . 5 TRANSITION AND IDENTITIES JOVAN KOMŠIĆ Democratic Transition And Identities . 11 LATINKA PEROVIĆ Serbian-Russian Historical Analogies . 57 MILAN SUBOTIĆ, A Different Russia: From Serbia’s Perspective . 83 SRĐAN BARIŠIĆ The Role of the Serbian and Russian Orthodox Churches in Shaping Governmental Policies . 105 RUSSIA’S SOFT POWER DR. JELICA KURJAK “Soft Power” in the Service of Foreign Policy Strategy of the Russian Federation . 129 DR MILIVOJ BEŠLIN A “New” History For A New Identity . 139 SONJA BISERKO, SEŠKA STANOJLOVIĆ Russia’s Soft Power Expands . 157 SERBIA, EU, EAST DR BORIS VARGA Belgrade And Kiev Between Brussels And Moscow . 169 DIMITRIJE BOAROV More Politics Than Business . 215 PETAR POPOVIĆ Serbian-Russian Joint Military Exercise . 235 SONJA BISERKO Russia and NATO: A Test of Strength over Montenegro .
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law Reforms in the Western Balkans (2018)
    RULE OF LAW REFORMS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Valeska Esch Olga van Zijverden (eds.) In cooperation with: The Aspen Institute Germany wishes to thank the German Federal Foreign Office for its sponsorship of the “Aspen Regional Dialogue Western Balkans 2018“ through the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe. The mission of the Aspen Institute Germany is to im- prove the quality of leadership through dialog about the values and ideals essential to meeting the challenges fac- ing organizations and governments at all levels. Over its forty-five-year history, Aspen Germany has been de- voted to advancing values-based leadership – to creating a safe, neutral space in which leaders can meet in order to discuss the complex challenges facing modern socie- ties confidentially and in depth, with respect for differing points of view, in a search for common ground. This publication includes conference papers and pro- ceedings of Aspen Germany’s Western Balkans confer- ence in 2018. The Aspen Institute’s role is limited to that of an organ- izer and convener. Aspen takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. or German governments. All statements of fact and expres- sions of opinion contained in all Aspen publications are the sole responsibility of the author or authors. For further information about the Aspen Institute Germany, please write to Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V. Friedrichstraße 60 10117 Berlin Germany or call at +49 30 80 48 90 0 Visit us at www.aspeninstitute.de www.facebook.com/AspenDeutschland www.twitter.com/AspenGermany Copyright © 2018 by The Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V., all rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Herunterladen, PDF, 145 KB, Nicht Barrierefrei
    BULLETIN DER BUNDESREGIERUNG Nr. 107-1 vom 27. Oktober 2009 Ansprache des Alterspräsidenten des Deutschen Bundestages, Dr. Heinz Riesenhuber, zur Eröffnung der konstituierenden Sitzung des 17. Deutschen Bundestages am 27. Oktober 2009 in Berlin: Guten Morgen, meine sehr verehrten Damen und Herren! Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, ich begrüße Sie zur konstituierenden Sitzung des 17. Deutschen Bundestags. Parlamentarischer Brauch ist es – das entspricht unserer Geschäftsordnung; ich kann die Paragrafen zitieren –, dass der Älteste die erste Sitzung des Bundestags eröffnet. Ich bin am Sonntag, dem 1. Dezember 1935, geboren. Wenn jemand von den Kollegen im Saal älter ist als ich, dann spreche er jetzt oder er schweige für im- mer. Unser Präsident würde sagen: Ich höre und sehe keinen Widerspruch. Meine Damen und Herren, damit rufe ich Punkt 1 der Tagesordnung auf: Eröffnung der Sitzung durch den Alterspräsidenten. Ich eröffne die erste Sitzung in der 17. Wahlperiode. Ich begrüße den Herrn Bundespräsidenten. Wir freuen uns, Herr Bundespräsident, dass Sie wieder bei uns sind. Bulletin Nr. 107-1 v. 27. Okt. 2009 / Alterspräs. Riesenhuber – Eröffn. konst. Sitzung des 17. Dt. BT - 2 - Ich begrüße herzlich die ehemalige Präsidentin des Deutschen Bundestages, Frau Dr. Rita Süssmuth. Sie haben uns mit Würde und Klugheit über die Jahre geführt – die Verbundenheit bleibt. Ich habe die Freude, Botschafter und Missionschefs zahlreicher Staaten hier zu be- grüßen. Sie alle sind herzlich willkommen – in der Verbundenheit der Gemeinschaft der Völker. Ich darf einen einzigen Kollegen besonders begrüßen, weil er heute mit uns seinen Geburtstag feiert, die schönste Party, die man sich vorstellen kann. Es ist der Kollege Henning Otte, dem ich herzlich gratuliere.
    [Show full text]