DOCSLIB.ORG

Estimating a Range of Flow Rates Resulting from Extreme Storm Events Within the Wekiva River Watershed Through Statistical Testing and Modeling” Submitted by Wesley K

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estimating a Range of Flow Rates Resulting from Extreme Storm Events Within the Wekiva River Watershed Through Statistical Testing and Modeling” Submitted by Wesley K University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2021 Estimating a range of flow atesr resulting from extreme storm events within the Wekiva River watershed through statistical testing and modeling Wesley K. Koning University of North Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, Hydraulic Engineering Commons, and the Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Suggested Citation Koning, Wesley K., "Estimating a range of flow atesr resulting from extreme storm events within the Wekiva River watershed through statistical testing and modeling" (2021). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1014. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/1014 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2021 All Rights Reserved ESTIMATING A RANGE OF FLOW RATES RESULTING FROM EXTREME STORM EVENTS WITHIN THE WEKIVA RIVER WATERSHED THROUGH STATISTICAL METHODS AND MODELING by Wesley K. Koning A thesis submitted to the School of Engineering in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION 2021 Copyright © 2020 by Wesley K. Koning All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form requires the prior written consent of Wesley K. Koning or a designated representative. The thesis “Estimating a range of flow rates resulting from extreme storm events within the Wekiva River watershed through statistical testing and modeling” submitted by Wesley K. Koning in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering has been Approved by the thesis committee: (Date) Redacted _______________________________________________ _________________4/14/2021 Christopher J. Brown, Ph.D., P.E. Thesis Advisor and Committee Chairperson Redacted _____________________________ ________4/14/2021_________ Çiğdem Akan, Ph.D., Committee Member Redacted _________________________ _________________4/14/2021 Patrick Kreidl, Ph.D., Committee Member Accepted for the School of Engineering: Redacted 4-15-2021 _____________________ _________________ Osama Jadaan, Ph.D. Director of the School of Engineering Accepted for the University of North Florida: _______________________________________________ _________________ John Kantner Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge those who have supported me through the journey of my research and accompanying thesis. A special thank you goes to my advisor, Dr. Christopher Brown. Your endless guidance, effort, and communication have proven to be an asset throughout this research. I am very appreciative to have worked alongside you and be given a wealth of knowledge throughout the years. I would like to thank Dr. Akan and Dr. Kreidl for being essential members of my thesis committee. In this past year they have challenged me to thoroughly understand the research I am pursuing, leaving no room for variables unanswered for. This has helped me become more confident in the work that is being done. I would like to thank the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) for their wealth of information as well as the modeling simulation they provided for this research. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) also provided crucial flow data given by their instrumentation. Each played an important part in composing the preliminary data that ultimately led to the flood flow estimates for this work I would like to give a special thank you to my family and fiancée for their continued support through this journey. Their motivation and support during this process has given me the drive to continue my best work. Little would be made possible without such great family. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF: ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 TABLES ................................................................................................................................................... 9 FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ 11 Abstract. ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 2. Literature Review ...................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 Model Simulated Estimates .............................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Statistical Flood Estimation .............................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Existing Flood Estimates .................................................................................................................. 18 2.3.1 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) .................................................................. 18 2.3.2 St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) ......................................................... 19 Chapter 3. History of the Wekiva Sub-Basin .............................................................................................. 20 3.1 The Wekiva Sub-Basin ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Watercourses ..................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Springs & Tributaries ........................................................................................................................ 22 Chapter 4. Hydrologic Background ............................................................................................................ 24 4.1 Wekiva River near Sanford (USGS Gage 02235000)....................................................................... 25 5 4.2 Little Wekiva River at Springs Landing (SJRWMD Gage 09502132) ............................................. 26 4.3 Black Water Creek near Debary (SJRWMD Gage 30143084) ......................................................... 26 Chapter 5. Manipulating HSPF Models ...................................................................................................... 28 5.1 Course of Action ............................................................................................................................... 28 5.2 Data Sources ..................................................................................................................................... 28 5.3 Land-use ............................................................................................................................................ 29 5.4 Target Date........................................................................................................................................ 29 5.5 Adjusting Rainfall ............................................................................................................................. 30 5.6 Output Processing ............................................................................................................................. 32 Chapter 6. Developing Statistical Tests ...................................................................................................... 33 6.1 Data Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 33 6.1.1 Data Sets from Synthetic ........................................................................................................... 33 6.1.2 Data Sets from USGS Gages ..................................................................................................... 34 6.2 Log-Pearson Type III ........................................................................................................................ 34 6.3 Power Law ........................................................................................................................................ 36 6.3.1 Solver ......................................................................................................................................... 36 6.3.2 Linear Regression ...................................................................................................................... 37 6.4 Theil-Sen ........................................................................................................................................... 38 Chapter 7. Results ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive River Management Plan
    September 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM Florida __________________________________________________________________________ The Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System was designated by an act of Congress on October 13, 2000 (Public Law 106-299). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1247) requires that each designated river or river segment must have a comprehensive river management plan developed. The Wekiva system has no approved plan in place. This document examines two alternatives for managing the Wekiva River System. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. Alternative A consists of the existing river management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternative. It does not imply that no river management would occur. The concept for river management under alternative B would be an integrated program of goals, objectives, and actions for protecting and enhancing each outstandingly remarkable value. A coordinated effort among the many public agencies and entities would be needed to implement this alternative. Alternative B is the National Park Service’s and the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee’s preferred alternative. Implementing the preferred alternative (B) would result in coordinated multiagency actions that aid in the conservation or improvement of scenic values, recreation opportunities, wildlife and habitat, historic and cultural resources, and water quality and quantity. This would result in several long- term beneficial impacts on these outstandingly remarkable values. This Environmental Assessment was distributed to various agencies and interested organizations and individuals for their review and comment in August 2010, and has been revised as appropriate to address comments received.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus Pictus) Species Status Assessment
    Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus pictus) Species Status Assessment Version 1.0 Photo by Christopher Anderson July 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Atlantic, Gulf & Mississippi Basin Regions Atlanta, GA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by Kathryn N. Smith-Hicks (Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute), Heath Rauschenberger (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [Service]), Lourdes Mena (Service), David Cook (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission [FWC]), and Erin Rivenbark (Service). Other species expertise, guidance, and document reviews were provided by Paul Moler (FWC), Gary Warren (FWC), Lindsey Reisinger (University of Florida), Katherine Lawlor (FWC), Kristi Lee (FWC), and Kasey Fralick (FWC). Additionally, peer reviewers including Troy Keller and Chester R. Figiel, Jr. provided valuable input into the analysis and reviews of a draft of this document. We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species status assessment report for Procambarus pictus (Black Creek crayfish), Version 1.0. July 2020. Atlanta, Georgia. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Black Creek crayfish (Procambarus pictus) are small to medium sized crayfish endemic to four northeastern Florida counties (Clay, Duval, Putnam, and St. Johns) in the Lower St. Johns River Basin. Black Creek crayfish rely on cool, flowing, sand-bottomed, and tannic-stained streams that are highly oxygenated. Locations that fulfill the species’ habitat requirements are typically headwater sections of streams that maintain a constant flow; however, they are found in small and large tributary streams. Within these streams, Black Creek crayfish require aquatic vegetation and debris for shelter with alternation of shaded and open canopy cover where they eat aquatic plants, dead plant and animal material, and detritus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinking Lakes & Sinking Streams in the Wakulla
    Nitrogen Contributions of Karst Seepage into the Upper Floridan Aquifer from Sinking Streams and Sinking Lakes in the Wakulla Springshed September 30, 2016 Seán E. McGlynn, Principal Investigator Robert E. Deyle, Project Manager Porter Hole Sink, Lake Jackson (Seán McGlynn, 2000) This project was developed for the Wakulla Springs Alliance by McGlynn Laboratories, Inc. with financial assistance provided by the Fish and Wildlife Foundation of Florida, Inc. through the Protect Florida Springs Tag Grant Program, project PFS #1516-02. Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Data Sources 8 Stream Flow Data 8 Lake Stage, Precipitation, and Evaporation Data 8 Total Nitrogen Concentration Data 10 Data Quality Assurance and Certification 10 Methods for Estimating Total Nitrogen Loadings 11 Precipitation Gains and Evaporation Losses 11 Recharge Factors, Attenuation Factors, and Seepage Rates 11 Findings and Management Recommendations 12 Management Recommendations 17 Recommendations for Further Research 18 References Cited 21 Appendix I: Descriptions of Sinking Waterbodies 23 Sinking Streams (Lotic Systems) 24 Lost Creek and Fisher Creek 26 Black Creek 27 Sinking Lakes (Lentic Systems) 27 Lake Iamonia 27 Lake Munson 28 Lake Miccosukee 28 Lake Jackson 30 Lake Lafayette 31 Bradford Brooks Chain of Lakes 32 Killearn Chain of Lakes 34 References Cited 35 Appendix II: Nitrate, Ammonia, Color, and Chlorophyll 37 Nitrate Loading 38 Ammonia Loading 39 Color Loading 40 Chlorophyll a Loading 41 Abstract This study revises estimates in the 2014 Nitrogen Source Inventory Loading Tool (NSILT) study produced by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection of total nitrogen loadings to Wakulla Springs and the Upper Wakulla River for sinking water bodies based on evaluating flows and water quality data for sinking streams and sinking lakes which were not included in the NSILT.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Data, Inventory, and Analysis
    CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS CONSERVATION ELEMENT 5. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Data, Inventory, and Analysis INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Conservation Element is to promote the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources within the City of Altamonte Springs. The objective of the Conservation Element Data Inventory and Analysis (DIA) Report is to document the conditions for various natural resources found within the City and identify key community priorities for conservation strategies. The DIA Report also examines the current and projected water needs for the community over the 20-year planning horizon (2030) to ensure adequate water supply is available to support future demands. Together, this information serves as the foundation for goals, objectives, and policies prepared to guide future development within the City of Altamonte Springs. DATA AND ANALYSIS This section addresses the data inventory and analysis requirements of §9J-5.013(1), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), supportive to the goals, objectives, policies and implementation programs for the Conservation Element. Natural resources may include water, wetlands, floodplains, groundwater, air, minerals, soil, wildlife, and vegetative resources. Surface Water Quality Surface water resources within the City of Altamonte Springs generally consist of the Little Wekiva River and several lakes. Little Wekiva River The Little Wekiva River flows north from Lake Lawne in Orange County through Lake Lotus and Trout Lake in Altamonte Springs. It continues to flow in a northerly direction at the City limits into one of the southern arms of the Wekiva Swamp and eventually on into the Wekiva River. Extensive urban development along the Little Wekiva River has resulted in a host of problems including increased rate of flow and velocities, minimal upstream stormwater storage and treatment due to development occurring before current stormwater regulations, erosion and flooding, and degradation of the river’s water quality from the movement and deposition of sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Final FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Water Resource Management, Bureau of Watershed Management NORTHWEST DISTRICT • OCHLOCKONEE–ST. MARKS BASIN Final TMDL Report Fecal Coliform TMDL for Black Creek, WBID 1024 Richard Wieckowicz, Ph.D., P.E. Erin G. Wilcox Ben Ralys September 29, 2008 Acknowledgments This analysis could not have been accomplished without significant contributions from staff in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Watershed Assessment Section. Editorial assistance was provided by Jan Mandrup-Poulsen and Linda Lord. Map production assistance was provided by Erin Wilcox. For additional information on the watershed management approach and impaired waters in the Black Creek Watershed, contact: Bonita Gorham Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management Watershed Planning and Coordination Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3565 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8513 Richard Wieckowicz, Ph.D., P.E. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management Watershed Assessment Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3565 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8468 Fax: (850) 245–8444 Access to all data used in the development of this report can be obtained by contacting Erin G. Wilcox Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management Watershed Assessment Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3555 Tallahassee,
    [Show full text]
  • American Shad Habitat Plan Update
    American Shad Habitat Plan Update State of Florida Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Division of Marine Fisheries Management Reid Hyle [email protected] April 2021 Approved May 5, 2021 Introduction Amendment 3 to the Interstate Management Plan for Shad and River Herring cites habitat loss and degradation as major factors in the decline of and continued depression of populations of American Shad along the Atlantic coast and requires member states to develop habitat plans for American Shad in their jurisdiction. This plan is submitted to serve as the required habitat plan for the State of Florida. It outlines historic and current habitats available to American Shad in Florida and identifies known threats to those habitats as well as efforts to mitigate those threats. The primary spawning run of American shad in Florida historically was and currently is in the St. Johns River. The only other river lying within Florida in which spawning has been documented historically (Williams and Bruger 1972) and recently (Holder et al. 2011, Dutterer et al. 2011) is the Econlockhatchee River which is a tributary to the St. Johns River. The St. Marys River is along the eastern border between Georgia and Florida historically supported a population of American Shad. This plan includes these three systems. The Ocklawaha River is the largest tributary of the St. Johns River and is the largest Atlantic drainage river in Florida obstructed by a dam in its lower reaches. There is no record of a spawning run of American Shad in the Ocklawaha River pre-dating construction of the dam in 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Leon County Projection, 1983 North American Datum
    84°41'0"W 1,920,000 84°34'0"W 1,960,000 84°27'0"W 2,000,000 84°20'0"W 2,040,000 84°13'0"W 2,080,000 84°6'0"W 2,120,000 83°59'0"W R 5 W R 4 W R 3 W R 2 W R 1 W R 1 E R 2 E R 3 E 302 «¬ «¬1 «¬262 G «¬309 «¬111 e «¬241 o r g N i a 4 T ¤£27 «¬35 TO 122 BEACHTON «¬ G r a d y C o u n t y TO 260 262 263 THOMASVILLE T h o m a s C TO METCALF 265 New o u n t y 258 259 264 Strickland 261 63 Hope Ch. 268 62 Cemetery 66 61 (north) 67 68 Wa 7 267 64 65 69 d 11 tson 155 266 100 l R 70 72 74 75 77 LK Atkinson 99 98 il Mt. L Road 97 rbanks Ferry R China 96 93 H 0338 Fai d. Pisgah Lin Strickland 94 92 y 91 Sunny Hill Rd D Hill Ch. 8 e n LK r 12 7 n L y 9 10 Cemetery u C 82 90 J 12 Dr 11 S 89 85 r 138 eadel (south) Beadel Dr 8 9 e 12 nry B Henry 88 e He 10 LK k e L S . Brown 87 83 15 i m Ln 86 84 81 16 Iamonia s Bethel Ch. f Ocklockonee Wats 101 9 e o n 102 103 3 TO CONCORD 17 104 f (Historical) 14 Hickory 105 1 Iamonia Cut-Off 18 18 k Iamonia e L e n Hill Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Publication SJ97-1 by Christine Adamus David Clapp Stephen Brown St. Johns River Water Management District Palatka, Fl
    Technical Publication SJ97-1 SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARIES ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: A REFERENCE GUIDE by Christine Adamus David Clapp Stephen Brown St. Johns River Water Management District Palatka, Florida 1997 Northwest Florida----.-------.-­ Water Management District Suwannee River Water Management District s .... ,St. .Johns River Water Management District South Florida Water Management District The St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) was created by the Florida Legislature in 1972 to be one of five water management districts in Florida. It includes all or part of 19 counties in northeast Florida. The mission of SJRWMD is to manage water resources to ensure their continued availability while maximizing environmental and economic benefits. It accomplishes its mission through regulation; applied research; assistance to federal, state, and local governments; operation and maintenance of water control works; and land acquisition and management. Technical Publications are published to disseminate information collected by SJRWMD in pursuit of its mission. Copies of this report can be obtained from: ~----------------------------------~ Library St. Johns River Water Management District P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, FL 32178-1429 Phone: (904) 329-4132 Contents CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................ iv List of Tables ................................................................................................. vii INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • St. Marks River and Apalachee Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan
    St. Marks River and Apalachee Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-03 Northwest Florida Water Management District St. Marks River and Apalachee Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-03 NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD George Roberts Jerry Pate John Alter Chair, Panama City Vice Chair, Pensacola Secretary-Treasurer, Malone Gus Andrews Jon Costello Marc Dunbar DeFuniak Springs Tallahassee Tallahassee Ted Everett Nick Patronis Bo Spring Chipley Panama City Beach Port St. Joe Brett J. Cyphers Executive Director Headquarters 81 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333-4712 (850) 539-5999 Crestview Econfina Milton 180 E. Redstone Avenue 6418 E. Highway 20 5453 Davisson Road Crestview, Florida 32539 Youngstown, FL 32466 Milton, FL 32583 (850) 683-5044 (850) 722-9919 (850) 626-3101 St. Marks River and Apalachee Bay SWIM Plan Northwest Florida Water Management District Acknowledgements This document was developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program and in accordance with sections 373.451-459, Florida Statutes. The plan update was prepared under the supervision and oversight of Brett Cyphers, Executive Director and Carlos Herd, Director, Division of Resource Management. Funding support was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. The assistance and support of the NFWF is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to especially recognize members of the public, as well as agency reviewers and staff from the District and from the Ecology and Environment, Inc., team that contributed to the development of this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Peer Review Requested Information
    May 7, 2018 During the peer review panel meeting on April 18, 2018, members of the panel expressed a need for additional information that is required for them to complete their review of the model. Specific areas of concern were: 1. Comparison of modeled Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA) transmissivity to available aquifer performance tests (APT’s) within the model domain, and; 2. Provide a comparison of observed and modeled baseflows along available drainage conveyances, with the intent of evaluating cumulative baseflows with progression in a downstream direction. Toward the above stated concerns, we offer the following additional information/clarification. 1. Aquifer Performance Test/Modeled Comparison – UFA Transmissivity Panel members requested additional analysis of APT’s within the model domain, including comparison of the APT database used by the modeling team as well as that used as the basis for an Upper Floridan Aquifer transmissivity map prepared by the USGS. The USGS map is titled, “Transmissivity of the Upper Floridan Aquifer in Florida and Parts of Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama” and designated by the USGS as Scientific Investigations Map 3204. This map and companion APT database map be found here: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3204/pdf/USGS_SIM- 3204_Kuniansky_Web.pdf, https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3204/TransmissivityMap_data.zip. The noted map, with the NFSEG boundary superimposed on it, is provided as Figure 1. It is important to note that USGS SIM 3204 was derived from surface interpolation of the APT data points only. Because of this, although the map shows the spatial distribution of transmissivity within a very large area, the accuracy of the transmissivity values shown on the map should be considered very low in the areas where APT data is not available or sparse.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Eating Fish Caught in Florida
    Fish Consumption Advisories are published periodically by the Your Guide State of Florida to alert consumers about the possibility of chemically contaminated fish in Florida waters. To Eating The advisories are meant to inform the public of potential health risks of specific fish species from specific Fish Caught water bodies. In Florida Florida Department of Health Prepared in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 2016 Florida Fish Advisories • Table 1: Eating Guidelines for Fresh Water Fish from Florida Waters page 1-33 • Table 2: Eating Guidelines for Marine and Estuarine Fish from Florida Waters page 34-35 • Table 3: Eating Guidelines for species from Florida Waters with Heavy Metals, Dioxin, Pesticides, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), or Saxitoxin Contamination page 36 Eating Fish is an important part of a healthy diet. Rich in vitamins and low in fat, fish contains protein we need for strong bodies. It is also an excellent source of nutrition for proper growth and development. In fact, the American Heart Association recommends that you eat two meals of fish or seafood every week. At the same time, most Florida seafood has low to medium levels of mercury. Depending on the age of the fish, the type of fish, and the condition of the water the fish lives in, the levels of mercury found in fish are different. While mercury in rivers, creeks, ponds, and lakes can build up in some fish to levels that can be harmful, most fish caught in Florida can be eaten without harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Ofw-Factsheet.Pdf
    Rick Scott Florida Department of Governor Environmental Protection Jennifer Carroll Bob Martinez Center Lt. Governor 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 Herschel T. Vinyard Jr. Secretary FACTSHEET ABOUT OUTSTANDING FLORIDA WATERS (OFW) Authority: Section 403.061(27), Florida Statutes, grants the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) the power to establish rules that provide for a special category of waterbodies within the state, to be referred to as “Outstanding Florida Waters,” which shall be worthy of special protection because of their natural attributes. Implementing DEP is the agency that designates a waterbody as an OFW; however, each Agency: OFW must be approved by an arm of DEP known as the Environmental Regulation Commission (ERC). The ERC is a seven member citizen’s body appointed by the Governor. Regulatory Projects regulated by the Department or a Water Management Significance: District (WMD) that are proposed within an OFW must not lower existing ambient water quality, which is defined for purposes of an OFW designation as the water quality at the time of OFW designation or the year before applying for a permit, whichever water quality is better. In general, DEP cannot issue permits for direct discharges to OFWs that would lower ambient (existing) water quality. In most cases, this deters new wastewater discharges directly into an OFW, and requires increased treatment for stormwater discharging directly into an OFW. DEP also may not issue permits for indirect discharges that would significantly degrade a nearby waterbody designated as an OFW. In addition, activities or discharges within an OFW, or which significantly degrade an OFW, must meet a more stringent public interest test.
    [Show full text]