DOCSLIB.ORG

Wekiva River Management Plan, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wekiva River Management Plan, Florida 3333 Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Comprehensive Management Plan Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee May 2012 Prepared with assistance from Pandion Systems, Inc. 4603 NW 6th Street Gainesville, FL 32609 Photo Credits Limpkin (cover). Photo by Greg Forcey. Cover (excluding Limpkin). Photos by Pandion Systems, Inc. Governor Bush signing the Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act. Clay Springs Boathouse, Clay Springs Hotel. Photos from Florida Photographic Collection, The Florida Memory Project, Florida Department of State, State Library and Archives of Florida. Egret; Little Wekiva River. Photos by John Parker. Armored catfish. Photo by Fuller, U.S. Geological Survey. Other photos from the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee. Reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of information contained in this document at the time of printing. Facts, figures, conditions, rules, and responsibilities described herein are subject to change in the future. Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Comprehensive Management Plan Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee in partnership with the National Park Service National Park Service, Florida Field Office 5342 Clark Road, PMB#123 Sarasota, Florida 34233-3227 May 2012 Funding for this management plan has been provided by the Partnership Rivers program through the National Park Service. Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Management Plan 2012 Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee • Dept of Interior, National Park Service • Orange County (Wekiva AMC Designated Federal Officer) Lori Cunniff, Envr Protection Div Manager Jaime Doubek-Racine Beth Jackson, Envr Program Supervisor Jeffrey Duncan, PhD • Seminole County Jamie Fosburgh* Tony Matthews, Principal Planner Steve Bowes* Wendy Meyer, Planning Division* • East Central Fl Regional Planning Council Shannon Wetzel, Environmental Scientist Daniel O’Keefe, council member* • St Johns River Water Management District Welton Cadwell, council member, Mary Brabham, Senior Project Manager Lake County Commissioner Elizabeth Thomas, Senior Project Manager* Fred Brummer, council member, Nancy Christman, Orange County Commissioner Intergovernmental Coordinator • Florida Dept of Environmental Protection • Florida Fish and Wildlife – Division of Recreation and Parks Conservation Commission Michael Bullock* Tom Shupe, District Wildlife Biologist Albert Gregory* Jay Holder, Biologist – Wekiva River Basin State Parks • City of Altamonte Springs John Fillyaw, Park Manager* Bill Wharton, Principle Planner* Warren Poplin, Park Manager Tim Wilson, Growth Management Director* John Lakich, Assistant Park Manager* • Danielle Marshall, Compliance Coordinator Amy Conyers, Assistant Park Manager City of Longwood • Florida Dept of Environmental Protection Daniel Anderson, Commissioner* – Wekiva River Aquatic Preserve John Maingot, Commissioner Deborah Shelley, Aquatic Preserve Manager Brian Sackett, Commissioner Barbara Howell, Environmental Specialist • City of Apopka • Florida Dept of Agriculture and Consumer John Land, Mayor Services – Division of Forestry William Arrowsmith, Vice Mayor Seminole State Forest • Florida Farm Bureau Joe Bishop, Forestry Supervisor II Anita Simpson* Michael Martin, State Forester Bill Duvall* • Audubon of Florida • Florida Forestry Association Charles Lee, Director of Advocacy Phil Gornicki* Katie Warner, Bird of Prey Center Director Joe Goscik* • Friends of the Wekiva River • The Nature Conservancy Nancy Prine (chair) Walter Thomson, Terrestrial Patricia Harden Conservation Director* • Lake County Water Authority Keith Schue, Wekiva-Ocala Michael Perry, Executive Director* Conservation Project Coordinator* Nancy Fullerton* Rebecca Perry, Central Florida • Lake County Protection Manager Catherine Hanson, Commissioner* Linda Stewart, Commissioner* Leslie Campione, Commissioner * Former committee member Gregg Welstead, Conservation and Compliance Director Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Advisory Management Committee iv Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Management Plan 2012 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the members of the Advisory Management Committee for their enthusiasm and diligence with reviewing and editing the draft documents presented to them over the last several months. We would also like to thank the members of the Friends of the Wekiva River Board of Directors for supporting us in creating this plan and seeing it through to completion. Several individuals deserve special thanks. Without their efforts to support the creation of this plan, the work simply would not have been completed. Special thanks to Joe Bishop, Mary Brabham, Jaime Doubek-Racine, Jay Exum, John Fillyaw, Pat Harden, Tony Matthews, Rob Mattson, Keith Schue, and Deborah Shelley who provided specific assistance and expertise to the authors. Thanks to the members of their staffs who supported these efforts and to the many others not specifically listed. This plan to manage the Wekiva River System is only possible because of the contributions of countless individuals and organizations that have striven to protect the Wekiva River System over the last several decades. Their legacy is a wonderful natural resource that, with careful management by individuals, managers, and organizations, will continue to serve the people of Florida for decades to come. Lastly, a very big thank you to Nancy Prine who serves as Chair of the Advisory Management Committee and displayed immense patience throughout the entire process in dealing with questions, suggestions, and comments as well as facilitating discussions between the Pandion Systems planning team and members of the Advisory Management Committee. Financial support for this plan was provided by the National Park Service Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers Program. - Pandion Systems Editors Peter Colverson, Pandion Fay Baird, Pandion Christine Denny, Pandion Darrell Freeman, Pandion Karen C. Hill, Pandion Sherith Bankston, Pandion Greg Forcey, Pandion Michael Adler, Pandion Keith Schue Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Advisory Management Committee v Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Management Plan 2012 Acronyms List AMC – Wekiva River System Advisory LCWA – Lake County Water Authority Management Committee LG – Local Government (city and/or county) AP – Wekiva River Aquatic Preserve LNCA – Lake Norris Conservation Area BMAP – Basin Management Action Plan LWRPSP – Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park BTIITF – Board of Trustees of the Internal MFLs – Minimum Flows and Levels Improvement Trust Fund NGCO – Non-Governmental Conservation Organization CAMA – Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas NPS – National Park Service CUP – Consumptive Use Permit OFW – Outstanding Florida Waters ECFRPC – East Central Florida OOCEA – Orlando-Orange County Regional Planning Council Expressway Authority EIS – Environmental Impact Statement ORV – Outstandingly Remarkable Value EPA – Environmental Protection Agency ORVs – Outstandingly Remarkable Values ERP – Environmental Resource Permit PLRG – Pollutant Load Reduction Goal FAC – Florida Administrative Code RPC -- Regional Planning Council FDACS – Florida Department of Agriculture RSRSR – Rock Springs Run State Reserve and Consumer Services SAV – Submerged Aquatic Vegetation FDCA – Florida Department of Community Affairs SJRWMD – St. Johns River Water Management District FDEP – Florida Department of Environmental Protection SSF – Seminole State Forest FDEPLE – Florida Department of Environmental TNC – The Nature Conservancy Protection Law Enforcement TMDL – Total Maximum Daily Load FDHR – Florida Division of Historical Resources USACE – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers FDOH – Florida Department of Health USCG – U.S. Coast Guard FDOT – Florida Department of Transportation USFWS – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FFS – Florida Forest Service WAVA – Wekiva Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment FGS – Florida Geological Survey WBATF – Wekiva River Basin Area Task Force FLEPPC – Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council WBWG – Wekiva Basin Working Group FNAI – Florida Natural Areas Inventory WMD – Water Management District FOWR - Friends of the Wekiva River WPPA – Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act FPS – Florida Park Service WRBCC – Wekiva River Basin FWC – Florida Fish and Wildlife Coordinating Committee Conservation Commission WRPA – Wekiva River Protection Act FWCLE – Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation WSA – Wekiva Study Area Commission Law Enforcement WRS – Wekiva River System IPMS – FWC Invasive Plant Management Section WSSP – Wekiwa Springs State Park Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Advisory Management Committee vi Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents WEKIVA RIVER SYSTEM ADVISORY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ................................................... IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. V ACRONYMS LIST ............................................................................................................................................. VI 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. WEKIVA RIVER SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive River Management Plan
    September 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM Florida __________________________________________________________________________ The Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System was designated by an act of Congress on October 13, 2000 (Public Law 106-299). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1247) requires that each designated river or river segment must have a comprehensive river management plan developed. The Wekiva system has no approved plan in place. This document examines two alternatives for managing the Wekiva River System. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. Alternative A consists of the existing river management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternative. It does not imply that no river management would occur. The concept for river management under alternative B would be an integrated program of goals, objectives, and actions for protecting and enhancing each outstandingly remarkable value. A coordinated effort among the many public agencies and entities would be needed to implement this alternative. Alternative B is the National Park Service’s and the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee’s preferred alternative. Implementing the preferred alternative (B) would result in coordinated multiagency actions that aid in the conservation or improvement of scenic values, recreation opportunities, wildlife and habitat, historic and cultural resources, and water quality and quantity. This would result in several long- term beneficial impacts on these outstandingly remarkable values. This Environmental Assessment was distributed to various agencies and interested organizations and individuals for their review and comment in August 2010, and has been revised as appropriate to address comments received.
    [Show full text]
  • So Far, Eight Have Qualified in Four City Races by John Peery Three City Commissioner Apopka Chief Staff Seats Are Open
    Lifestyle Sports Emily Goode is one of three An AHS graduate and for- AHS graduates in the Flori- mer football player coaches da State marching band. linebackers at Louisville. God Bless See page 1C. America See page 1B. The Apopka Chief Covering the community in the 21st century ©2014 The Apopka Chief Volume 92 Number 1 Friday, January 3, 2014 / 50 cents So far, eight have qualified in four city races By John Peery Three city commissioner Apopka Chief Staff seats are open. Two were up for re-election after a regular four- Eight people have qualified year term, but Kilsheimer’s seat to run for the four political offices is also up for election since he is open on the Apopka City Coun- running for mayor. cil as of Tuesday, December 31, Incumbent Commissioner at 11:30 a.m. Billie Dean has qualified for re- Qualifying for three city election to Seat 1, while Diane commissioner seats and the may- Velazquez had filed paperwork or’s office continues until noon to challenge Marilyn Ustler Mc- on Monday, January 6. The elec- Queen for Seat 2. McQueen has tion is scheduled for March 11. also filed her paperwork to run for Three of the five expected another term. mayoral candidates have filed Linda Laurendeau and Sam the paperwork to run for that of- Ruth have both filed for Seat City Council candidate Diane Velazquez (r) was the first to show up fice, including Mayor John H. 3, which is being given up by Linda Laurendeau and Mayor John Monday, December 30, at noon to file paperwork to run for city office.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Exhibits
    CONSERVATION EXHIBITS: • Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program • Econlockhatchee and Wekiva River Protection Areas and Wekiva Study Area CON Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program Goal #1: Direct incompatible land use away from wetlands. Goal #2: Protect the high quality mosaic of inter-connected systems in the Wekiva, Lake Jesup and East Areas. Special Areas Future Land Use Map Land Acquisition Designations East Rural Wekiva Econ Unique Conservation County Urban/Rural 42% of the River Basin Rivers Basin Planning Land Areas Boundary wetlands in Techniques Use Seminole County are in public Clustering, ownership Limited PUD Specifics, Riparian Uses No Rural Zoning Review Criteria W-1 Habitat Zoning encroachment Protection and and 50' Buffer Zone Rule Land Use Overlay The voters of Seminole County have recently Riparian Habitat approved an additional five Protection Zoning million dollar bond Zone Rule referendum for the purchase of Natural Lands. Special Zoning Development and Land Use Review Requirements Process WETLANDS Wetland PROTECTION Mitigation CONSERVATION CON Exhibit-1 Last amended on 12/09/2008 by Ord. 2008-44 U S LIN E D R S 4 W 4 BA LM Y BE AC H DR Last amended on byOrd. 2008-44 12/09/2008 CONSERVATION 1 E E S W K A I S E V R N K A D 4 I BEA R L AKE RD S V 3 L A P A 6 R T K R I N ED EN PAR K AV E B L G U R S Econlockhatchee River Protection Area Wekiva Area Area Study Boundary Protection River Econlockhatchee Area Protection River Wekiva Urban/Rural Boundary N D N R E D L L R
    [Show full text]
  • AEG-ANR House Offer #1
    Conference Committee on Senate Agriculture, Environment, and General Government Appropriations/ House Agriculture & Natural Resources Appropriations Subcommittee House Offer #1 Budget Spreadsheet Proviso and Back of the Bill Implementing Bill Saturday, April 17, 2021 7:00PM 412 Knott Building Conference Spreadsheet AGENCY House Offer #1 SB 2500 Row# ISSUE CODE ISSUE TITLE FTE RATE REC GR NR GR LATF NR LATF OTHER TFs ALL FUNDS FTE RATE REC GR NR GR LATF NR LATF OTHER TFs ALL FUNDS Row# 1 AGRICULTURE & CONSUMER SERVICES 1 2 1100001 Startup (OPERATING) 3,740.25 162,967,107 103,601,926 102,876,093 1,471,917,888 1,678,395,907 3,740.25 162,967,107 103,601,926 102,876,093 1,471,917,888 1,678,395,907 2 1601280 4,340,000 4,340,000 4,340,000 4,340,000 Continuation of Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment Dacs- 3 - - - - 3 037/Eog-B0514 Increase In the Division of Licensing 1601700 Continuation of Budget Amendment Dacs-20/Eog #B0346 - 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 4 - - - - 4 Additional Federal Grants Trust Fund Authority 5 2401000 Replacement Equipment - - 6,583,594 6,583,594 - - 2,624,950 2,000,000 4,624,950 5 6 2401500 Replacement of Motor Vehicles - - 67,186 2,789,014 2,856,200 - - 1,505,960 1,505,960 6 6a 2402500 Replacement of Vessels - - 54,000 54,000 - - - 6a 7 2503080 Direct Billing for Administrative Hearings - - (489) (489) - - (489) (489) 7 33N0001 (4,624,909) (4,624,909) 8 Redirect Recurring Appropriations to Non-Recurring - Deduct (4,624,909) - (4,624,909) - 8 33N0002 4,624,909 4,624,909 9 Redirect Recurring Appropriations to Non-Recurring
    [Show full text]
  • Study Area Development Part 2
    2. Study Area Guiding Principles The recommended study area is intended to meet the purpose and need of the project and minimize impacts to the social, cultural, natural and physical environment. A study area is a large area that is wide enough to contain several options for transportation improvements. The following “Guiding Principles” were used to identify the general study area within which a range of alternatives would be evaluated: • Follows, where feasible, existing road alignments through environmentally sensitive areas; • Minimizes direct impacts to wetlands; • Minimizes impacts on springshed and ground water recharge areas; • Serves an identified long-term regional transportation need; • Attempts to improve the connectivity of existing wildlife areas; • Relieves or removes traffic demands on SR 46 and provides a North-South connection from SR 46 to US 441 with limited interchanges; • Minimizes impacts to habitat and species; • Avoids, or mitigates if required, impacts on conservation lands and their proper management; • Seeks to minimize impacts on existing neighborhoods and residential communities; and, • Does not encourage or promote additional development from already approved land uses. 3. Composite Constraint Mapping The major features from the social, cultural, and natural environmental constraints were layered together to create a composite area map showing the major constraints and areas of concern (see Exhibit G-5). Areas without major constraints represent the most reasonable areas for alternatives development. These
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Document Regarding Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Section 303(D) List Amendments for Basin Group
    DECISION DOCUMENT REGARDING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION’S SECTION 303(d) LIST AMENDMENTS FOR BASIN GROUP THREE Prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Water Management Division May 12, 2010 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 3 II. Statutory and Regulatory Background 6 A. Identification of Water Quality Limited Segments (WQLSs) for Inclusion on the Section 303(d) List 6 B. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 6 C. Priority Ranking 7 III. Analysis of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Submission 7 A. Florida’s Group Three 2010 Update 8 1. Florida’s Water Quality Standards and Section 303(d) List Development 8 2. List Development Methodology and Data Assessment 10 3. Public Participation Process 11 4. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 12 B. Review of FDEP’s Identification of Waters 14 1. Review of FDEP’s Data Guidelines 15 2. No Pollutant Identified for Impairment 18 3. Aquatic Life Use Impairment 18 4. Primary and Secondary Recreational Use Support 23 5. Fish and Shellfish Consumption Use Support 24 6. Drinking Water Use Support and Protection of Human Health 25 1 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 C. Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters 26 1. FDEP’s Addition of Water Quality Limited Segments 26 2. Section 303(d) List Delistings 26 3. Other Pollution Control Requirements 27 4. EPA Identified Waters 30 5. Priority Ranking and Targeting 30 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Orlando Urban Exploration Guide
    URBAN EXPLORATION WHERE TO EXPLORE IN AND AROUND THE ORLANDO AREA – INCLUDES HIKING, BIKING, AND PADDLING Recreation Opportunities in Orlando Let’s review the best places to get outside in downtown and suburban Orlando Downtown Adventures TAKE A BUS, A BIKE, OR WALK Gaston Edwards Park Located in Ivanhoe Park Village, Gaston Edwards runs along the shore of Lake Ivanhoe. It offers fitness stations, a sand volleyball court, plenty of shade trees, and a couple docks. You can even launch a paddleboard from the paddleboard-specific dock. The Orlando Urban Trail can also be accessed from the park. Address 1236 N Orange Ave, Orlando, FL 32804 Distance from Downtown 1.5 miles via bike lanes Open Sunrise to Sunset Mead Botanical Gardens Perfect for the plant lover, Mead Gardens has paths all through the garden. Relax at the tranquil ponds or learn about different plant species sprinkled around the park Address 1300 S Denning Dr, Winter Park, FL 32789 Distance from Downtown 4.2 miles via the Orlando Urban Trail Open 8:00AM-7:00PM Greenwood Urban Wetland Greenwood Urban Wetland is one of the best places in downtown Orlando for birdwatching despite its proximity to the highway. The wetland is the perfect home for many native Florida birds. Address 1411 Greenwood St, Orlando, FL 32801 Distance from Downtown 2.4 miles via bike lanes Open Sunrise to Sunset Dickson Azalea Park Dickson Azalea Park offers an oasis for those who want to enjoy its shady trees, picturesque landscape, beautiful birds and flowing water. Frequently a location for those who want a quiet lunch, or a relaxing view, this park is truly one of Orlando’s gems.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area
    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) September 5, 2019 St. Cloud, Florida 1 Agenda 1. Introductions and Background……... Don Medellin, SFWMD 2. SJRWMD MFLs Priority List……Andrew Sutherland, SJRWMD 3. SWFWMD MFLs Priority List..Doug Leeper, SWFWMD 4. SFWMD MFLs Priority List……Don Medellin, SFWMD 5. Stakeholder comments 6. Adjourn 2 Statutory Directive for MFLs Water management districts or DEP must establish MFLs that set the limit or level… “…at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.” Section 373.042(1), Florida Statutes 3 Statutory Directive for Reservations Water management districts may… “…reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety.” Section 373.223(4), Florida Statutes 4 District Priority Lists and Schedules Meet Statutory and Rule Requirements ▪ Prioritization is based on the importance of waters to the State or region, and the existence of or potential for significant harm ▪ Includes waters experiencing or reasonably expected to experience adverse impacts ▪ MFLs the districts will voluntarily subject to independent scientific peer review are identified ▪ Proposed reservations are identified ▪ Listed water bodies that have the potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent water management district are identified 5 2019 Draft Priority List and Schedule ▪ Annual priority list and schedule required by statute for each district ▪ Presented to respective District Governing Boards for approval ▪ Submitted to DEP for review by Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus Pictus) Species Status Assessment
    Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus pictus) Species Status Assessment Version 1.0 Photo by Christopher Anderson July 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Atlantic, Gulf & Mississippi Basin Regions Atlanta, GA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by Kathryn N. Smith-Hicks (Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute), Heath Rauschenberger (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [Service]), Lourdes Mena (Service), David Cook (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission [FWC]), and Erin Rivenbark (Service). Other species expertise, guidance, and document reviews were provided by Paul Moler (FWC), Gary Warren (FWC), Lindsey Reisinger (University of Florida), Katherine Lawlor (FWC), Kristi Lee (FWC), and Kasey Fralick (FWC). Additionally, peer reviewers including Troy Keller and Chester R. Figiel, Jr. provided valuable input into the analysis and reviews of a draft of this document. We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species status assessment report for Procambarus pictus (Black Creek crayfish), Version 1.0. July 2020. Atlanta, Georgia. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Black Creek crayfish (Procambarus pictus) are small to medium sized crayfish endemic to four northeastern Florida counties (Clay, Duval, Putnam, and St. Johns) in the Lower St. Johns River Basin. Black Creek crayfish rely on cool, flowing, sand-bottomed, and tannic-stained streams that are highly oxygenated. Locations that fulfill the species’ habitat requirements are typically headwater sections of streams that maintain a constant flow; however, they are found in small and large tributary streams. Within these streams, Black Creek crayfish require aquatic vegetation and debris for shelter with alternation of shaded and open canopy cover where they eat aquatic plants, dead plant and animal material, and detritus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources & Loads of Nitrate to the Wekiva River System
    Sources & loads of nitrate to the wekiva river system Preliminary assessment Florida Department Mactec St. johns river of Environmental engineering and water Management Protection consulting district WekivaWekiva basinbasin nitratenitrate sourcingsourcing studystudy • Special legislative appropriation to Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection in 2006 ($250,000) • The Department contracted with St. Johns River Water Management District to implement a “Phase 1” assessment** using existing data and models (max. of $100,000) • SJRWMD used the services of their contractor - MACTEC Engineering and Consulting (Gainesville, FL) • Deficiencies identified in Phase 1 would be addressed as part of a follow-up Phase 2 effort ** Constraints: report ready by start of 2007 Session & available for Florida Dept. of Health to use MactecMactec taskstasks (developed in scope of work) • Obtain, review and integrate existing data and models • Conduct “desk-top” (i.e., “planning level”) inventory of potential sources of nitrate loading to surface and ground waters • Review & summarize literature on nitrate loading to surface and ground waters from land uses in the Wekiva basin • Develop preliminary nitrate budget for the basin (“pie chart”) • Develop preliminary recommendations for nitrate load reduction strategies • Develop recommendations for follow-up work (Phase 2) • Produce report summarizing the above efforts Study area Surface was the Basin “wekiva basin” • Surface water drainage and Springshed “springshed” • Most technically defensible • Needed for future modeling efforts • Needed for Total Max. Daily Load development Wekiva Study Area WekivaWekiva basinbasin nitrogennitrogen sourcingsourcing studystudy Data sources: • SJRWMD land use/land cover data (1999 & 2004) • East Central Florida Groundwater Model (SJRWMD) – recharge estimates • Wekiva Study Area stormwater model (WMM) • Approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhexia January 20
    The Rhexia Paynes Prairie Chapter of the Florida Native Plant Society www.paynesprairie.fnpschapter January 2020 January General Meeting Overview of the SJRWMD with Jennifer Mitchell, Public Communications Coordinator Tuesday, January 21, 2019, 7:00 p.m. Plant ID Workshop at 6:30 p.m. Unitarian-Universalist Fellowship Hall, 4225 NW 34th Street, Gainesville, FL 32605 Jennifer Mitchell is Public Communica- grow, we must reduce per capita water usage tions Coordinator with the St. Johns River Wa- to ensure adequate water supply for people ter Management District. Her presentation will and nature. Learn more about how the district give an overview of the District including in- is working to protect and restore the district formation on water use and district lands. lands in your area. Established in 1972, the district is an envi- Jennifer is passionate about Florida’s in- ronmental regulatory agency of the state. In credible water resources and hopes to spark this presentation, learn what the district does interest in what you can do to help protect Flor- to accomplish its four missions of providing ida’s waterways. After earning her Ph.D. in water quality, water supply, flood protection, Forest Ecology from Auburn University, she and maintaining natural systems. Our district completed a post-doc at the University of Flor- properties are one facet of accomplishing ida in Soil and Water Science. Because she these missions. realizes that greater results will come from more In 2018, 980 million gallons of water were used a day community participation, she now works to spread the across the SJRWMD.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocklawaha River Hydrologic Basin
    Why Care Implementing Future Growth Permitting Process Final Design Success Economic Growth often requires new development and/or redevelopment. Schools . Downtown Revitalization Anti-Degradation under Chapter 62-4.242 and 62-302.300, F.A.C and 40D-4.301, F.A.C., require agencies to ensure permits... “will not adversely affect the quality of receiving waters such that the water quality standards will be violated.” 403.067 F.S. Requires Consideration of Future Growth in the Development of BMAPs. Most rely on Anti-Degradation and the “Net-Improvement” Policy. Downstream Protection Protecting Waters = More Stringent Controls = More $ = Higher Project Cost WEEKI WACHEE 1948 WEEKI WACHEE 2013 http://www.slideshare.net/FloridaMemory http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/tourism/ Project/florida-winter-holidays clear-water-mermaids-and-yes-history-at-weeki-wachee- springs/2131164 Preserving Water Quality & Project Specific Requirements Williamson Blvd - road extension project of approximately 2 miles. Located: Port Orange, Volusia County Small section of existing road widening. Multi-use improvement including transportation corridor planning. Soil Conditions: High Groundwater Existing Borrow Pits remain on-site from construction of I-95. Land use change from natural conditions to roadway. Williamson Blvd Project Outfalls to Spruce Creek. Spruce Creek has an adopted Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Dissolved Oxygen (DO). Spruce Creek Impaired for . Dissolved Oxygen (DO) . Causative Pollutant . Total Phosphorus . BOD Wasteload Allocations (WLA) . NPDES MS4 % Reduction: . 27% TP . 25% BOD . TMDL (mg/L) . 0.16 mg/L TP . 2.17 mg/L BOD Net Improvement is required for Phosphorus. Net Improvement meets: . Anti-Degradation Rules . 403.067 Future Growth .
    [Show full text]