DOCSLIB.ORG

Ocklawaha River Hydrologic Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Why Care Implementing Future Growth Permitting Process Final Design Success Economic Growth often requires new development and/or redevelopment. Schools . Downtown Revitalization Anti-Degradation under Chapter 62-4.242 and 62-302.300, F.A.C and 40D-4.301, F.A.C., require agencies to ensure permits... “will not adversely affect the quality of receiving waters such that the water quality standards will be violated.” 403.067 F.S. Requires Consideration of Future Growth in the Development of BMAPs. Most rely on Anti-Degradation and the “Net-Improvement” Policy. Downstream Protection Protecting Waters = More Stringent Controls = More $ = Higher Project Cost WEEKI WACHEE 1948 WEEKI WACHEE 2013 http://www.slideshare.net/FloridaMemory http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/tourism/ Project/florida-winter-holidays clear-water-mermaids-and-yes-history-at-weeki-wachee- springs/2131164 Preserving Water Quality & Project Specific Requirements Williamson Blvd - road extension project of approximately 2 miles. Located: Port Orange, Volusia County Small section of existing road widening. Multi-use improvement including transportation corridor planning. Soil Conditions: High Groundwater Existing Borrow Pits remain on-site from construction of I-95. Land use change from natural conditions to roadway. Williamson Blvd Project Outfalls to Spruce Creek. Spruce Creek has an adopted Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Dissolved Oxygen (DO). Spruce Creek Impaired for . Dissolved Oxygen (DO) . Causative Pollutant . Total Phosphorus . BOD Wasteload Allocations (WLA) . NPDES MS4 % Reduction: . 27% TP . 25% BOD . TMDL (mg/L) . 0.16 mg/L TP . 2.17 mg/L BOD Net Improvement is required for Phosphorus. Net Improvement meets: . Anti-Degradation Rules . 403.067 Future Growth . Redevelopment or New Development can not result in an Increase of Nutrient Loads. For this Project, SJRWMD Applying “Apopka Rule”. Special Basin Criteria for Lake Apopka Hydrologic Basin For Example, if Project Site is currently Commercial and is redeveloped to Medium- Density Residential, Net Improvement may not require Significant Additional Treatment. Natural Conditions developed to Institutional (new school) requires Significant Additional Treatment. CHAPTER 40C-41, F.A.C. The rules in this chapter establish additional surface water management standards and criteria, To ensure that development within the basins incorporates the appropriate water quantity and water quality control and other environmental measures necessary, To protect the integrity of the public investments in the basins and minimizes adverse impacts to the water resources of the District. Ocklawaha River Hydrologic Basin Wekiva River Hydrologic Basin & Wekiva Recharge Protection Basin Econlockhatchee River Hydrologic Basin Tomoka River Hydrologic Basin Spruce Creek Hydrologic Basin Sensitive Karst Areas Basin Lake Apopka Hydrologic Basin Upper St. Johns River Hydrologic Basin Impaired Water = Requirement to meet Net Improvement for TP. Needed 86% Treatment Efficiency for this project. (Thank Goodness not TN!!) Project in Special Basin: Spruce Creek Hydrologic Basin . Recharge Standard . Most Effective Recharge Area (Type A soils) . 3” Runoff on Increase in DCIA . Yet, Dry Retention was not the Go-To BMP . Some Special Basin Criteria was Inapplicable . Floodplain Storage (Traversing Work) . Not cause a net reduction in flood storage within the 100 year floodplain. Riparian Habitat Protection Zone . Not adversely effect the abundance, diversity, food sources or habitat. Project discharges to Outstanding Florida Water, WMD requirements include: . Additional 50% Treatment Volume . Additional 50% Permanent Pool Most stringent requirements apply, in this case net improvement treatment is more stringent. Treatment volume requirements still must be met. Convert existing Borrow Pits to Stormwater Management Facilities. Utilize increased removal efficiency from the Borrow Pits because of their increased residence time. Really Large!!!! . 12 acres of Road into a 12 Acre Pond . >86% removal of TP Request for Additional Information (RAI) . Permitting standard is a maximum residence time of 21 days, regardless of the actual site specific condition. The Williamson Blvd Borrow Pits calculated at over 500 days of residence time. Using “Apopka Rule” . 21 Day Residence Time = 64.5% Removal Efficiency. Maximum allowed for Wet Detention. Treatment Type Suitability Pervious Pavement Not Allowable for Roadway No Green Roof/Cistern Not Applicable for Roadway No Low Impact Design BMPs FL Friendly Landscape, Site Reforestation No Urban Stormwater Retrofit Primarily Greenfield Roadway No Stormwater Harvesting Insufficient Need for Required Reuse No Swales Urban per County, Wider Footprint No Chemical Treatment Maintenance No Exfiltration Trench Percolation with High GW/Tailwater No Underground Storage and Retention Percolation with high GW/Tailwater No Vegetated Natural Buffers Percolation with high GW/Tailwater No Wet Detention Insufficient Load Reduction No Wet Detention/Wet Detention Treatment Train Insufficient Load Reduction No Managed Aquatic Plant Systems (MAPS) Insufficient Load Reduction No Nutrient Baffle Boxes Insufficient Load Reduction No Dry Retention/Wet Detention Treatment Train Sufficient Load Reduction Yes Initial Concept: Average 3’ of fill required for the road primarily because of high groundwater conditions. Re-Design with BMP Treatment Trains: Dry/Wet Train Adds an Additional 3-6’ of fill. 3’ + 6’ = 9 Foot Tall Road!!! Almost 3 feet higher than adjacent I-95 Result of Re-Design Is: . More Roadway Fill for Discharge into Dry Pond, . More Wetland Impacts for Expanded Footprint, . More Maintenance Issues for Steeper Side Slopes from Minimizing Project Footprint. The Light at the End of the Tunnel Allow use of “Harper Methodology” and Loading Rates . “Evaluation of Current Stormwater Design Criteria within the State of Florida” (June 2007). Utilize Current Conditions to Determine Pre- Development Loads . Not “Natural Vegetative Community Type” or that which is likely to have existed prior to disturbance. Result in Wet Detention Only (while achieving no increase in loading). The SJRWMD was already using “Harper Methodology” for nitrogen values. Project outside of the Lake Apopka Hydrologic Basin (Special Basin Criteria) . “Apopka Rule” not required by law. Reasonable Assurance governs permit conditions to meet anti-degradation requirements. Will Allow use of Draft Handbook (March 2010) . Minor Differences in loading, etc from FDEP 2007 Will Allow use of Published Loading Rates, not restricted to values in Draft Handbook. Will Allow Current Conditions to determine Pre- development Loads. Will Require Monitoring. Draft ERP Land Use Categories Apopka EMC Handbook EMC Low-Density Residential 0.22 0.18 Single-Family 0.34 0.31 Multi-Family 0.51 0.48 Commercial 0.29 0.20 Light Industrial 0.23 Highway 0.34 0.17 Agricultural - Pasture 0.34 0.70 Agricultural - Crops/Groves/Ornamentals/Nurseries 0.52 0.38 Mining/Extractive 0.15 Vegetative Natural Communities 0.015 - 0.226 Open Land/Recreational/Fallow Cropland 0.05 Forests/Abandoned Tree Crops 0.08 Residence Time . Calculate using Permanent Pool Volume at 12’ deep per standard criteria. Allowed to use BMPTRAIN Model Output. Water Quality Monitoring Required. Provide Reasonable Assurance from Science, Monitoring/Data collection, and Backup Treatment Options. Monitoring Required due to Limited Data on Borrow Pits and their Treatment Efficiency. Sample two of the proposed five wet ponds. One Borrow Pit . One Standard Pond Use Auto-Samplers at Inflow/Outflow. Begin Sampling two years Post Construction. Sample for three turnovers of Residence Time. Can shorten time if Steady State is achieved earlier and is in Compliance. Sample to Establish Baseline Conditions in Borrow Pits before Construction. If WQ Monitoring proves treatment approach is insufficient, back-up options may include: . Floating Wetland Mats . Compensatory Treatment in the basin . Treat Untreated Roadways . Increase Level of Treatment in Existing SMF . Golf Course fertilization (reduction in phosphorus) . Stormwater Harvesting reuse for irrigation of future development. An Arduous Adventure Worth Taking Keeping our watersheds healthy is a community quality of life issue. Economic Growth is also important to the vitality of our communities. Balancing these two opposing ideals requires creativity, a willingness to do things differently, and perseverance to finding a solution. Typically are going to cost more. Even with WMD approval on our project approach, monitoring is still an extra cost. Extra Cost in Staff Time to Research and Complete Calculations. If you can’t change the Where, be prepared to change the How. Innovative Design & Permitting . Cost Sharing . Site Re-Design If at First you don’t Succeed, Make a U-Turn. Just because an agency has always done it that way, doesn’t mean they won’t agree to use a alternative approach. Science really can win the day. Be Flexible . Research BMPs that may be unfamiliar to you. Be prepared to provide proof. Supporting Studies . Calculations . Monitoring Overwrite Default Concentrations Built for up to 4 Catchments per Spreadsheet Used Separate Spreadsheets for Pre and Post Catchments This project was single treatment areas with individual outfalls, not interconnected ponds. Selected Option “L - 4 Catchment Parallel” rather than series or combination catchment options. .
Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive River Management Plan

    Comprehensive River Management Plan

    September 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM Florida __________________________________________________________________________ The Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System was designated by an act of Congress on October 13, 2000 (Public Law 106-299). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1247) requires that each designated river or river segment must have a comprehensive river management plan developed. The Wekiva system has no approved plan in place. This document examines two alternatives for managing the Wekiva River System. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. Alternative A consists of the existing river management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternative. It does not imply that no river management would occur. The concept for river management under alternative B would be an integrated program of goals, objectives, and actions for protecting and enhancing each outstandingly remarkable value. A coordinated effort among the many public agencies and entities would be needed to implement this alternative. Alternative B is the National Park Service’s and the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee’s preferred alternative. Implementing the preferred alternative (B) would result in coordinated multiagency actions that aid in the conservation or improvement of scenic values, recreation opportunities, wildlife and habitat, historic and cultural resources, and water quality and quantity. This would result in several long- term beneficial impacts on these outstandingly remarkable values. This Environmental Assessment was distributed to various agencies and interested organizations and individuals for their review and comment in August 2010, and has been revised as appropriate to address comments received.
  • Stormwater Management Master Plan Updates There Are 16 Defined

    Stormwater Management Master Plan Updates There Are 16 Defined

    Stormwater Management Master Plan Updates There are 16 defined watersheds in Volusia County. Stormwater Management Master Plans (SWMP) have been prepared for the 11 of the watersheds, with the concentration on the urbanized basins. Many of these SWMPs were prepared in the 90’s and are currently over 20 years old. These plans need to be updated to address current corporate boundaries and responsibilities and to address current priorities. The SWMP updates proposed are for the Indian River Lagoon, the Halifax River, the Tomoka River and Spruce Creek. The studies will update the stormwater system improvements in these watersheds and analyze for water quantity and water quality impacts to the receiving water bodies, each of which is an impaired water body. Current Situation The Indian River Lagoon, Halifax River, Tomoka River and Spruce Creek SWMPs were completed in the 90s prior to the cities in these areas completing SWMPs. Each of these basins is an impaired water body with Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) established. A Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) has been completed for the Indian River Lagoon and the BMAP process has begun for the Halifax River (Northern Coastal Basin). Future BMAPs are scheduled for the Tomoka River and Spruce Creek basins. The goal of the SWMP Updates is to review and update Volusia County’s previous SWMPs with a focus on water quality and projects that serve areas within unincorporated Volusia County. Project The preparation of a Stormwater Management Master Plan Update for these watersheds will include: A review of previous SWMPs to determine if capital projects recommended at that time may still be recommended for grant applications An evaluation of potential water quality benefits resulting from altering or increasing stormwater maintenance practices An evaluation of water quality conditions to propose additional improvement alternatives and quantify resultant pollutant load reductions The majority of the land uses in these basins is urban and fall within city limits.
  • Conservation Exhibits

    Conservation Exhibits

    CONSERVATION EXHIBITS: • Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program • Econlockhatchee and Wekiva River Protection Areas and Wekiva Study Area CON Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program Goal #1: Direct incompatible land use away from wetlands. Goal #2: Protect the high quality mosaic of inter-connected systems in the Wekiva, Lake Jesup and East Areas. Special Areas Future Land Use Map Land Acquisition Designations East Rural Wekiva Econ Unique Conservation County Urban/Rural 42% of the River Basin Rivers Basin Planning Land Areas Boundary wetlands in Techniques Use Seminole County are in public Clustering, ownership Limited PUD Specifics, Riparian Uses No Rural Zoning Review Criteria W-1 Habitat Zoning encroachment Protection and and 50' Buffer Zone Rule Land Use Overlay The voters of Seminole County have recently Riparian Habitat approved an additional five Protection Zoning million dollar bond Zone Rule referendum for the purchase of Natural Lands. Special Zoning Development and Land Use Review Requirements Process WETLANDS Wetland PROTECTION Mitigation CONSERVATION CON Exhibit-1 Last amended on 12/09/2008 by Ord. 2008-44 U S LIN E D R S 4 W 4 BA LM Y BE AC H DR Last amended on byOrd. 2008-44 12/09/2008 CONSERVATION 1 E E S W K A I S E V R N K A D 4 I BEA R L AKE RD S V 3 L A P A 6 R T K R I N ED EN PAR K AV E B L G U R S Econlockhatchee River Protection Area Wekiva Area Area Study Boundary Protection River Econlockhatchee Area Protection River Wekiva Urban/Rural Boundary N D N R E D L L R
  • Study Area Development Part 2

    Study Area Development Part 2

    2. Study Area Guiding Principles The recommended study area is intended to meet the purpose and need of the project and minimize impacts to the social, cultural, natural and physical environment. A study area is a large area that is wide enough to contain several options for transportation improvements. The following “Guiding Principles” were used to identify the general study area within which a range of alternatives would be evaluated: • Follows, where feasible, existing road alignments through environmentally sensitive areas; • Minimizes direct impacts to wetlands; • Minimizes impacts on springshed and ground water recharge areas; • Serves an identified long-term regional transportation need; • Attempts to improve the connectivity of existing wildlife areas; • Relieves or removes traffic demands on SR 46 and provides a North-South connection from SR 46 to US 441 with limited interchanges; • Minimizes impacts to habitat and species; • Avoids, or mitigates if required, impacts on conservation lands and their proper management; • Seeks to minimize impacts on existing neighborhoods and residential communities; and, • Does not encourage or promote additional development from already approved land uses. 3. Composite Constraint Mapping The major features from the social, cultural, and natural environmental constraints were layered together to create a composite area map showing the major constraints and areas of concern (see Exhibit G-5). Areas without major constraints represent the most reasonable areas for alternatives development. These
  • C.B. Moore on the Ocklawaha River: No Place for a Gopher

    C.B. Moore on the Ocklawaha River: No Place for a Gopher

    C.B. MOORE ON THE OCKLAWAHA RIVER: NO PLACE FOR A GOPHER CYNTHIA L. CERRATO Osceola National Forest, P.O. Box 70, Olustee, Florida 32072 In 1992, I conducted an archaeological research project at Some of the collection, along with Moore's original field notes, Davenport Landing in the Ocala National Forest (ONF). This remains there today (Davis 1987). small, high bluff is in the northernmost part of the forest, on the Considering the era in which Moore worked, there was a southern bank of the Ocklawaha River. Since preliminary testing limited choice of transportation modes. Since most of Moore's in 1991 yielded prehistoric ceramics and lithics, the goals of the 'excavations were at coastal or riverine sites, he traveled by project's first phase were to determine the site's time period, water. To reach his destinations, Moore employed the Gopher, function, and significance in American prehistory and to a stem-wheel steamboat (Figure 2). The Gopher was 30.5 m delineate the site's boundaries. The second phase of this project (100 ft) long, about 6 m (20 ft) wide, and normally "carried a was to investigate an earthwork on the bluff. The earthwork captain, a pilot, an engineer, a crew of five men, six men to resembled a small volcano and was approximately 12 m in dig, and special guests" (Morse and Morse 1983:21). diameter. The central "pit" was at least 1 m deep with ridges 1- Moore's Southeastern excavations began in Florida. From 2 m high. The ONF Archeologist, Ray Willis, and I believed 1891 to 1895, he excavated sites along the St.
  • Orlando Urban Exploration Guide

    Orlando Urban Exploration Guide

    URBAN EXPLORATION WHERE TO EXPLORE IN AND AROUND THE ORLANDO AREA – INCLUDES HIKING, BIKING, AND PADDLING Recreation Opportunities in Orlando Let’s review the best places to get outside in downtown and suburban Orlando Downtown Adventures TAKE A BUS, A BIKE, OR WALK Gaston Edwards Park Located in Ivanhoe Park Village, Gaston Edwards runs along the shore of Lake Ivanhoe. It offers fitness stations, a sand volleyball court, plenty of shade trees, and a couple docks. You can even launch a paddleboard from the paddleboard-specific dock. The Orlando Urban Trail can also be accessed from the park. Address 1236 N Orange Ave, Orlando, FL 32804 Distance from Downtown 1.5 miles via bike lanes Open Sunrise to Sunset Mead Botanical Gardens Perfect for the plant lover, Mead Gardens has paths all through the garden. Relax at the tranquil ponds or learn about different plant species sprinkled around the park Address 1300 S Denning Dr, Winter Park, FL 32789 Distance from Downtown 4.2 miles via the Orlando Urban Trail Open 8:00AM-7:00PM Greenwood Urban Wetland Greenwood Urban Wetland is one of the best places in downtown Orlando for birdwatching despite its proximity to the highway. The wetland is the perfect home for many native Florida birds. Address 1411 Greenwood St, Orlando, FL 32801 Distance from Downtown 2.4 miles via bike lanes Open Sunrise to Sunset Dickson Azalea Park Dickson Azalea Park offers an oasis for those who want to enjoy its shady trees, picturesque landscape, beautiful birds and flowing water. Frequently a location for those who want a quiet lunch, or a relaxing view, this park is truly one of Orlando’s gems.
  • Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area

    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area

    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) September 5, 2019 St. Cloud, Florida 1 Agenda 1. Introductions and Background……... Don Medellin, SFWMD 2. SJRWMD MFLs Priority List……Andrew Sutherland, SJRWMD 3. SWFWMD MFLs Priority List..Doug Leeper, SWFWMD 4. SFWMD MFLs Priority List……Don Medellin, SFWMD 5. Stakeholder comments 6. Adjourn 2 Statutory Directive for MFLs Water management districts or DEP must establish MFLs that set the limit or level… “…at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.” Section 373.042(1), Florida Statutes 3 Statutory Directive for Reservations Water management districts may… “…reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety.” Section 373.223(4), Florida Statutes 4 District Priority Lists and Schedules Meet Statutory and Rule Requirements ▪ Prioritization is based on the importance of waters to the State or region, and the existence of or potential for significant harm ▪ Includes waters experiencing or reasonably expected to experience adverse impacts ▪ MFLs the districts will voluntarily subject to independent scientific peer review are identified ▪ Proposed reservations are identified ▪ Listed water bodies that have the potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent water management district are identified 5 2019 Draft Priority List and Schedule ▪ Annual priority list and schedule required by statute for each district ▪ Presented to respective District Governing Boards for approval ▪ Submitted to DEP for review by Nov.
  • Ballot Title, Summary and Proposed Amendment – Rights of the Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee River Committee

    Ballot Title, Summary and Proposed Amendment – Rights of the Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee River Committee

    Ballot Title, Summary and Proposed Amendment – Rights of the Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee River Committee A. Introduction. This Charter amendment would provide for definitions, create natural rights for the waters of Orange County, the right to clean water, a private right of action and standing for citizens of Orange County to enforce these rights and injunctive remedies. The proposed amendment prohibits any governmental agency, non-natural person or corporate entity from intentionally or negligently polluting the Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee Rivers, or any other Waters within Orange County. B. Ballot Proposal: The ballot title and question for Question #__ are as follows: PROHIBITING POLLUTION OF THE WEKIVA AND ECONLOCKHATCHEE RIVERS OR OTHER WATERS OF ORANGE COUNTY Amending the charter by providing charter protections for the natural rights of the Wekiva and Econlockhatchee Rivers or other Waters of Orange County by prohibiting pollution, providing a definition of Waters, providing a private right of action and standing for citizens of Orange County to enforce these protections against governmental agencies, non-natural persons or corporate entities that intentionally or negligently pollute the Waters, and providing for severability and exceptions. Comptroller estimated financial impact: __________________. _______ Yes ________No C. Text Revisions: Article 7 of the Orange County Charter is amended by adding Section 704.1. (Underline text is added to the charter). Section 704.1 – Right to Clean Water, Standing and Enforcement. A. Natural Rights of Orange County Waters and Citizens. (1) The Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee River, portions of which are within the boundaries of Orange County, and all other Waters within the boundaries of Orange County, have a right to exist and to be protected against Pollution.
  • Florida State Parks Data by 2021 House District

    Florida State Parks Data by 2021 House District

    30, Florida State Parks FY 2019-20 Data by 2021 House Districts This compilation was produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation . FloridaStateParksFoundation.org Statewide Totals • 175 Florida State Parks and Trails (164 Parks / 11 Trails) comprising nearly 800,000 Acres • $2.2 billion direct impact to Florida’s economy • $150 million in sales tax revenue • 31,810 jobs supported • 25 million visitors served # of Economic Jobs Park House Districts Parks Impact Supported Visitors 1 Salzman, Michelle 0 2 Andrade, Robert Alexander “Alex” 3 31,073,188 436 349,462 Big Lagoon State Park 10,336,536 145 110,254 Perdido Key State Park 17,191,206 241 198,276 Tarklin Bayou Preserve State Park 3,545,446 50 40,932 3 Williamson, Jayer 3 26,651,285 416 362,492 Blackwater Heritage State Trail 18,971,114 266 218,287 Blackwater River State Park 7,101,563 99 78,680 Yellow River Marsh Preserve State Park 578,608 51 65,525 4 Maney, Thomas Patterson “Patt” 2 41,626,278 583 469,477 Fred Gannon Rocky Bayou State Park 7,558,966 106 83,636 Henderson Beach State Park 34,067,312 477 385,841 5 Drake, Brad 9 64,140,859 897 696,022 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 Deer Lake State Park 1,738,073 24 19,557 Eden Gardens State Park 3,235,182 45 36,128 Falling Waters State Park 5,510,029 77 58,866 Florida Caverns State Park 4,090,576 57 39,405 Grayton Beach State Park 17,072,108 239 186,686 Ponce de Leon Springs State Park 6,911,495 97 78,277 Three Rivers State Park 2,916,005 41 30,637 Topsail Hill Preserve State Park 19,533,681 273 213,693 6 Trumbull, Jay 2 45,103,015 632 504,860 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 St.
  • Florida Greenway and Trail Designations Sorted by Name

    Florida Greenway and Trail Designations Sorted by Name

    Florida Greenway And Trail Designations Sorted by Name DESCRIPTION COUNTY(S) TYPE ACRES MILES NUMBER DATE Addison Blockhouse Historic State Park Volusia Site 147.92 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Alafia River Paddling Trail Hillsborough Paddling Trail 13.00 Grandfather 12/8/1981 Alafia River State Park Hillsborough Site 6,314.90 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Alfred B. Maclay Gardens State Park Leon Site 1,168.98 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Allen David Broussard Catfish Creek Preserve Polk Site 8,157.21 OGT-DA0079 12/9/2015 Amelia Island State Park Nassau Site 230.48 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Anastasia State Park St. Johns Site 1,592.94 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Anclote Key Preserve State Park Pasco, Pinellas Site 12,177.10 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Apalachee Bay Maritime Heritage Paddling Trail Wakulla Paddling Trail 58.60 OGT-DA0089 1/3/2017 Apalachicola River Blueway Multiple - Calhoun, Franklin, Gadsden, Gulf, Paddling Trail 116.00 OGT-DA0058 6/11/2012 Jackson, Liberty Apalachicola River Paddling Trails System Franklin Paddling Trail 100.00 OGT-DA0044 8/10/2011 Atlantic Ridge Preserve State Park Martin Site 4,886.08 OGT-DA0079 12/9/2015 Aucilla River Paddling Trail Jefferson, Madison, Taylor Paddling Trail 19.00 Grandfather 12/8/1981 Avalon State Park St. Lucie Site 657.58 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Bagdad Mill Santa Rosa Site 21.00 OGT-DA0051 6/6/2011 Bahia Honda State Park Monroe Site 491.25 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Bald Point State Park Franklin Site 4,875.49 OGT-DA0003 1/22/2002 Bayard and Rice Creek Conservation Areas Clay, Putnam Site 14,573.00 OGT-DA0031 6/30/2008 Bayshore Linear
  • State of the Everglades Spring 2016

    State of the Everglades Spring 2016

    State of the Everglades Spring 2016 Audubon Florida - 4500 Biscayne Blvd. #205 Miami, FL 33137 Photo by Rod J. Wiley http://www.GivetoAudubonFlorida.org Dear Friends, The ecological problems in the Everglades and our coastal waters are not new. Nor are they easy to solve. Audubon Florida is dedicated to making sure restoration is done right, and is a responsible investment focused on wildlife needs. But we need your help. Photo by: Marjorie Shropshire If the public is united in demanding that Water Quality and Storage Solutions to decision-makers support the Everglades and the coastal estuaries, we can find and commit Ease Florida’s Coastal Water Crisis to practical solutions. Florida’s coastal waters are experiencing an unprecedented ecological Thank you for all that you do. collapse. Fish kills in the Indian River Lagoon, plumes of dark water in the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie estuaries, and a massive seagrass die-off in Florida Bay are just the latest evidence. Scientists believe this crisis is due to the mismanagement and Eric Draper over-drainage of freshwater off Florida’s mainland combined with Executive Director increased water pollution from fertilizers, sewage, and septic tanks. Water management problems start in Lake Okeechobee – the liquid heart of the Everglades. The Lake’s optimum water level is between 12.5 and 15.5 feet. Higher levels drown out native plant communities and damage foraging, breeding, and nesting habitats for iconic wildlife such as the endangered Everglade Snail Kite. When water levels are high enough Everglades Wading Bird Nesting Decline* to threaten the safety of the aging Herbert Hoover Dike, the U.S.
  • Avian Pointe |Fully-Entitled, 480-Unit Multi-Housing Development

    Avian Pointe |Fully-Entitled, 480-Unit Multi-Housing Development

    FULLY-ENTITLED, 480-UNIT MULTI-HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AVIAN POINTE | SITE IN FAST-GROWING APOPKA (ORLANDO), FLORIDA AVIAN POINTE THE OFFERING Property Overview – Parcel B2 Address: 2995 Peterson Road, Apopka, FL 32703 Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P. is pleased to exclusively offer an exceptional Municipality: Orange County investment opportunity to acquire Avian Pointe (the “Property” or “Site”), Parcel ID: 07-21-28-0000-00-002 a 30-acre development site fronting State Road 429, just south of U.S. Site Area: 30.912 Acres Highway 441 in the high-growth Orlando bedroom community of Apopka, Max Density: 480 Units Florida. Looking ahead, the Apopka region is poised to display accelerated growth upon the completion of the Wekiva Parkway Extension (scheduled Use / Zoning: Multifamily / PD R-1 for 2022) – a 27-mile expressway which will complete the Central Florida Stories / Maximum Height: Four / 50 Feet Beltway encircling the Orlando MSA, enabling Apopka residents to commute seamlessly to highly-coveted areas in Seminole County including Lake Mary, Heathrow, and Sanford, which collectively possess nearly 10 million square feet of office space (roughly the same amount as INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS Downtown Orlando), and are home to major high-wage employers including Deloitte, Verizon, AAA, JPMorgan Chase, BNY Mellon, and LOCATED IN THE DIRECT PATH OF GROWTH IN WEST Convergys, among others. ORLANDO The Site is fully-entitled for 480 apartment units, and represents one PRIME FRONTAGE & VISIBILITY ALONG SR 429; parcel (B2) within the larger Avian Pointe master-planned community ADVANTAGEOUSLY SITUATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE (127-acre land assemblage), which possesses full-entitlements for 56 NEW WEKIVA PARKWAY EXTENSION single family homes, 222 townhomes, in addition to another +/- 20 acres of recreational and mixed-use space which allow for a school, boutique hotel, professional office, senior living facility, as well as centralized FULL ENTITLEMENTS IN-PLACE FOR 480 UNITS community amenities such as a resort-style pool, playground, dog park, and a variety of sports fields.