DOCSLIB.ORG

Leon County Projection, 1983 North American Datum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

84°41'0"W 1,920,000 84°34'0"W 1,960,000 84°27'0"W 2,000,000 84°20'0"W 2,040,000 84°13'0"W 2,080,000 84°6'0"W 2,120,000 83°59'0"W R 5 W R 4 W R 3 W R 2 W R 1 W R 1 E R 2 E R 3 E 302 «¬ «¬1 «¬262 G «¬309 «¬111 e «¬241 o r g N i a 4 T ¤£27 «¬35 TO 122 BEACHTON «¬ G r a d y C o u n t y TO 260 262 263 THOMASVILLE T h o m a s C TO METCALF 265 New o u n t y 258 259 264 Strickland 261 63 Hope Ch. 268 62 Cemetery 66 61 (north) 67 68 Wa 7 267 64 65 69 d 11 tson 155 266 100 l R 70 72 74 75 77 LK Atkinson 99 98 il Mt. L Road 97 rbanks Ferry R China 96 93 H 0338 Fai d. Pisgah Lin Strickland 94 92 y 91 Sunny Hill Rd D Hill Ch. 8 e n LK r 12 7 n L y 9 10 Cemetery u C 82 90 J 12 Dr 11 S 89 85 r 138 eadel (south) Beadel Dr 8 9 e 12 nry B Henry 88 e He 10 LK k e L S . Brown 87 83 15 i m Ln 86 84 81 16 Iamonia s Bethel Ch. f Ocklockonee Wats 101 9 e o n 102 103 3 TO CONCORD 17 104 f (Historical) 14 Hickory 105 1 Iamonia Cut-Off 18 18 k Iamonia e L e n Hill Ch. ine Cemetery 13 e r 61 r Van Brunt C r 00 00 00 16 17 FDOT Route Designation 14 i Cemetery 319 y 16 Canal/Ditch e Q r R 15 s QQQ S ¤£ 17 15 14 RRR 13 18 Tall Timbers ¹ D t Murray r L v 13 o i c Pond i Research Station and Land Conservancy k N l a n 10 n Thompson 3 Interstate Highway Stream/River R § Bell d ¨¦ Foshalee Van Pond 600,000 21 23 22 A T Cemetery Ferguson d. Brunt 12 r Slough 22 R AB m n Pond e ia Anders Arm Gin House 20 600,000 ¡1 Bannerman id 19 20 Jake Pond " Divided U.S. Federal Highway Water Bodies Plantation r C e e Flat M Hole 19 21 23 m 24 24 r 23 24 19 20 21 22 o n A Foshalee Lake Twin N Sheep 1 Hall e Van ¡ Island h u U.S. Federal Highway Intermittent Pond o 3 Meridian c Island Brunt " Island Lake Iamonia y Ldg. Carns k 59 n Ldg. T É c W Pond LLK É t 30°38'0"N AB27 Divided State Highway Swamp/Marsh 29 0343 27 o Mitchell K y 30°38'0"N 26 L l e Lake Iamonia LL Island 25 h Mt. Zion 25 H s 30 29 Lester Ch. 26 AB27 c 26 25 o 30 28 27 30 29 28 State Highway Boat Ramp r St. Pauls Island s O a Buzzard e Ch. s 27 Island h Sunset o B Bull Headley Mitchell Pond 221 e d TO MONTICELLO Ldg. LK Point P m R L L Divided County Road Cemetery r l e a l A Dawkins l 33 n 32 34 i Hammock e t i v a t Pond r Sink 32 Rd r e n t Centenary n 221 34 i a t Halls ree LK 36 o 36 Ch. n G L m 35 L County Road Paved Church with Cemetery y n e Cemetery Mitchell o a C t 35 32 33 34 35 R r 31 33 36 31 Emma Lee 34 Cemetery Davis Pond n 31 d C ld Pond O u i Alberta 0341 221 o LLK County Road Improved Church Lake LK d L C 5 Straw Deer Lake Lake Pickle 2 i 319 Middle 1 Pond Moccasin Pond Spring 4 Monkey ¹¤£ 3 n 1 School 61 4 Gap Head Pond Divided Local Road Coast Guard Station r Business Reeves e d Q Huggle Moccasin 6 Shiloh Lake 6 R R Ldg. 2 5 2 6 5 3 d e Pond 1 AME Ch. Lonnie Alligator 63 e 4 3 ll Miccosukee s i Burney 3 Dianne v Cemetery Pond 2 Q 4 s Gap Road Cemetery R O M Felkel Miccosukee Local Road, Paved College or University d rchard Pond Rd Lake a m 27 a TO HAVANA o ¤£ h ¹ 10 T Ingalls G 9 0344 LK155 8 9 Epiphany Petty 7 Shady L Lutheran Grove Local Road, Improved Communications Facility LK 10 11 Blocker Gulf 12 9 Sanders Field d L School 11 Ch. R AB12 d Lake Hammock Harolds Airport d n Saunders 8 o R P d Orchard 8 Pond Cemetery Pond 10 11 ar Pine 7 (PVT.) a h i c l Or Pond 12 7 or Rd 10 11 12 Hill oct o Divided Connector Road DOT Facility Gaines Canopy 0342 Bockus Pr 9 n Lake Rds. Ch. B Lake 8 7 Cemetery LK a d g L Lake R n r L a ne Boat le r il D m M v Cedar Hill l 18 17 a Chiles Pond r Cypress e d t a Ldg. n l Connector Road Fire Station High n i Ldg. 16 R e r Carr C O 14 Mallard Pond d School o Lake Pond . Bradford 17 15 16 18 18 m Louise Bridges TO HAVANA e 15 Pond 16 0347 e 15 18 M Agricultural Research Center Holley 17 14 s L. Jackson e LK 13 L 17 15 14 13 L 16 13 Pond 151 n Miccosukee Aquatic Preserve 14 LK a L k N e r s L B re r C e N l nth e a Gardner Rd a P Rest Area Moore c t Bradford-Eppes k 2 e Lake 2 Medical Facility k 19 Cemetery s 19 C Concord ee V r St. Pauls Cemetery C McBride re Concord nther Lake Miccosukee d Cemetery T Ch. Tallahassee e Pa Alston South Ldg. T k R Popular a Lester Chinese 142 Cemetery n 20 Spring Christian Rococo K Commercial Airport Cemetery L a L Ch. i Centerville Patrol or Police Station 0361 h 0342 24 d Tallahassee d 23 R 20 i 21 K 19 22 L e r L LK 21 23 L 24 L e Bradfordville 20 20 a L e Commercial 21 23 Moore 24 22 23 k 21 24 22 Gilbert su M Heliport Airport Pond o 24 l 22 Pond c Post Office N ic M 90 Friendship Rollins Point Pisgah k ¤£ l Ox Bottom Rd Ox Bottom e ¹ C (Tallahassee) 29 e Cody 59 Ch. S 27 29 St. Phillips r LK 27 Live X 26 C L Small Landing Strip 0345 Runner Pond 28 a Ch. Power Substation Lake k Gum Pond 30 Indian Cemetery Oak Point 10 25 LK c 30 L a Springs Matthews Roberts l T Smith Tom John Q Little B 25 Ch. R T Ch. Shemonie 29 25 Lake Cemetery Pond 26 r Millers Roberts Runways a 63 Elizabeth Lake 560,000 School (Other) 25 n Ldg. ler Landing 26 Pond 28 27 29 28 26 25 s Q il R R M d Peck p o L. Jackson 0346 30 Roberts Rd Sunray Road 560,000 r K 27 L t L L Peck Amtrak a ¹¤£ Aquatic Preserve Brill Point School K-12 t Alfred B. Maclay Cemetery io Lake d 34 n R Gardens State Park Lake Jackson Lake Killarney 10 Tower Rd 31 Freeland Lake Jackson Overstreet 319 p 32 Ochlockohee 36 ¹¤£ Cemetery Other Train Station ¨¦§ m Ldg. 32 Crump Mahan Dr 10 County Park N u 36 8 M 35 r Q TO 34 C 34 35 36 33 R 31 o Oak Knoll Q M 61 R n MONTICELLO r 33 Estates 35 Single Track Rail Roads 36 o Faulk RQ £90 e ¤ Ldg. ¹ Solid Waste Management Facility r S Lake Hall t Lake 4 k e e d e 6 Jackson R v r 5 3 i Weaver Harbinwood 30°31'0"N United C Rohden J e f f e r s o n C o u n t y 2 k Multiple Track Rail Roads R 1 Methodist Cove 2 Estates Cove c 30°31'0"N Wayside Park n 6 a Black l a Long Bridle B i 5 e Rhoden Cove 1 3 Creek 1 Baum 263 Fords d Pond TO LLOYD 6 AB i Path Billingsley Ldg. Culley e r !( C Arm Unity Of e Family Community with Post Office 2 a Acres Memorial 4 State Trail p Tallahassee B Cemetery n M Cemetery la i ck 10 t C 0348 o L a re a Exit ! 11 l 8 0352 ek ¨¦§ LK k C L k 63A L L. Jackson Mounds Wadesboro e LK !(^ State Capital 8 i L 203 7 K r L L L 8 National Forest c L Archaeological S N 12 Q St Louis C R 11 h 151 Q 0347 r 12 8 W State Park a R Homestead D o Parish 7 LK 9 o p L LK n l L El Destinado L 10 a re i Ridge Patty D t h 7 Incorporated Areas r. a 10 Q a h R State Forest 12 10 l M Sink TO QUINCY Praise ¨¦§ C c 9 Macon 10 11 Cathedral Fuller Rd.
Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive River Management Plan

    Comprehensive River Management Plan

    September 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM Florida __________________________________________________________________________ The Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System was designated by an act of Congress on October 13, 2000 (Public Law 106-299). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1247) requires that each designated river or river segment must have a comprehensive river management plan developed. The Wekiva system has no approved plan in place. This document examines two alternatives for managing the Wekiva River System. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. Alternative A consists of the existing river management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternative. It does not imply that no river management would occur. The concept for river management under alternative B would be an integrated program of goals, objectives, and actions for protecting and enhancing each outstandingly remarkable value. A coordinated effort among the many public agencies and entities would be needed to implement this alternative. Alternative B is the National Park Service’s and the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee’s preferred alternative. Implementing the preferred alternative (B) would result in coordinated multiagency actions that aid in the conservation or improvement of scenic values, recreation opportunities, wildlife and habitat, historic and cultural resources, and water quality and quantity. This would result in several long- term beneficial impacts on these outstandingly remarkable values. This Environmental Assessment was distributed to various agencies and interested organizations and individuals for their review and comment in August 2010, and has been revised as appropriate to address comments received.
  • Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus Pictus) Species Status Assessment

    Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus Pictus) Species Status Assessment

    Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus pictus) Species Status Assessment Version 1.0 Photo by Christopher Anderson July 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Atlantic, Gulf & Mississippi Basin Regions Atlanta, GA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by Kathryn N. Smith-Hicks (Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute), Heath Rauschenberger (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [Service]), Lourdes Mena (Service), David Cook (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission [FWC]), and Erin Rivenbark (Service). Other species expertise, guidance, and document reviews were provided by Paul Moler (FWC), Gary Warren (FWC), Lindsey Reisinger (University of Florida), Katherine Lawlor (FWC), Kristi Lee (FWC), and Kasey Fralick (FWC). Additionally, peer reviewers including Troy Keller and Chester R. Figiel, Jr. provided valuable input into the analysis and reviews of a draft of this document. We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species status assessment report for Procambarus pictus (Black Creek crayfish), Version 1.0. July 2020. Atlanta, Georgia. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Black Creek crayfish (Procambarus pictus) are small to medium sized crayfish endemic to four northeastern Florida counties (Clay, Duval, Putnam, and St. Johns) in the Lower St. Johns River Basin. Black Creek crayfish rely on cool, flowing, sand-bottomed, and tannic-stained streams that are highly oxygenated. Locations that fulfill the species’ habitat requirements are typically headwater sections of streams that maintain a constant flow; however, they are found in small and large tributary streams. Within these streams, Black Creek crayfish require aquatic vegetation and debris for shelter with alternation of shaded and open canopy cover where they eat aquatic plants, dead plant and animal material, and detritus.
  • Estimating a Range of Flow Rates Resulting from Extreme Storm Events Within the Wekiva River Watershed Through Statistical Testing and Modeling” Submitted by Wesley K

    Estimating a Range of Flow Rates Resulting from Extreme Storm Events Within the Wekiva River Watershed Through Statistical Testing and Modeling” Submitted by Wesley K

    University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2021 Estimating a range of flow atesr resulting from extreme storm events within the Wekiva River watershed through statistical testing and modeling Wesley K. Koning University of North Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, Hydraulic Engineering Commons, and the Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Suggested Citation Koning, Wesley K., "Estimating a range of flow atesr resulting from extreme storm events within the Wekiva River watershed through statistical testing and modeling" (2021). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1014. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/1014 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2021 All Rights Reserved ESTIMATING A RANGE OF FLOW RATES RESULTING FROM EXTREME STORM EVENTS WITHIN THE WEKIVA RIVER WATERSHED THROUGH STATISTICAL METHODS AND MODELING by Wesley K. Koning A thesis submitted to the School of Engineering in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION 2021 Copyright © 2020 by Wesley K. Koning All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form requires the prior written consent of Wesley K. Koning or a designated representative. The thesis “Estimating a range of flow rates resulting from extreme storm events within the Wekiva River watershed through statistical testing and modeling” submitted by Wesley K.
  • Sinking Lakes & Sinking Streams in the Wakulla

    Sinking Lakes & Sinking Streams in the Wakulla

    Nitrogen Contributions of Karst Seepage into the Upper Floridan Aquifer from Sinking Streams and Sinking Lakes in the Wakulla Springshed September 30, 2016 Seán E. McGlynn, Principal Investigator Robert E. Deyle, Project Manager Porter Hole Sink, Lake Jackson (Seán McGlynn, 2000) This project was developed for the Wakulla Springs Alliance by McGlynn Laboratories, Inc. with financial assistance provided by the Fish and Wildlife Foundation of Florida, Inc. through the Protect Florida Springs Tag Grant Program, project PFS #1516-02. Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Data Sources 8 Stream Flow Data 8 Lake Stage, Precipitation, and Evaporation Data 8 Total Nitrogen Concentration Data 10 Data Quality Assurance and Certification 10 Methods for Estimating Total Nitrogen Loadings 11 Precipitation Gains and Evaporation Losses 11 Recharge Factors, Attenuation Factors, and Seepage Rates 11 Findings and Management Recommendations 12 Management Recommendations 17 Recommendations for Further Research 18 References Cited 21 Appendix I: Descriptions of Sinking Waterbodies 23 Sinking Streams (Lotic Systems) 24 Lost Creek and Fisher Creek 26 Black Creek 27 Sinking Lakes (Lentic Systems) 27 Lake Iamonia 27 Lake Munson 28 Lake Miccosukee 28 Lake Jackson 30 Lake Lafayette 31 Bradford Brooks Chain of Lakes 32 Killearn Chain of Lakes 34 References Cited 35 Appendix II: Nitrate, Ammonia, Color, and Chlorophyll 37 Nitrate Loading 38 Ammonia Loading 39 Color Loading 40 Chlorophyll a Loading 41 Abstract This study revises estimates in the 2014 Nitrogen Source Inventory Loading Tool (NSILT) study produced by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection of total nitrogen loadings to Wakulla Springs and the Upper Wakulla River for sinking water bodies based on evaluating flows and water quality data for sinking streams and sinking lakes which were not included in the NSILT.
  • 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(D), 305(B), and 314 Report and Listing Update

    2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(D), 305(B), and 314 Report and Listing Update

    2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314 Report and Listing Update Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection June 2020 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 floridadep.gov 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2020 This Page Intentionally Blank. Page 2 of 160 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2020 Letter to Floridians Ron DeSantis FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Governor Jeanette Nuñez Environmental Protection Lt. Governor Bob Martinez Center Noah Valenstein 2600 Blair Stone Road Secretary Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 June 16, 2020 Dear Floridians: It is with great pleasure that we present to you the 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida. This report meets the Federal Clean Water Act reporting requirements; more importantly, it presents a comprehensive analysis of the quality of our waters. This report would not be possible without the monitoring efforts of organizations throughout the state, including state and local governments, universities, and volunteer groups who agree that our waters are a central part of our state’s culture, heritage, and way of life. In Florida, monitoring efforts at all levels result in substantially more monitoring stations and water quality data than most other states in the nation. These water quality data are used annually for the assessment of waterbody health by means of a comprehensive approach. Hundreds of assessments of individual waterbodies are conducted each year. Additionally, as part of this report, a statewide water quality condition is presented using an unbiased random monitoring design. These efforts allow us to understand the state’s water conditions, make decisions that further enhance our waterways, and focus our efforts on addressing problems.
  • Your Guide to Eating Fish Caught in Florida

    Your Guide to Eating Fish Caught in Florida

    Fish Consumption Advisories are published periodically by the Your Guide State of Florida to alert consumers about the possibility of chemically contaminated fish in Florida waters. To Eating The advisories are meant to inform the public of potential health risks of specific fish species from specific Fish Caught water bodies. In Florida February 2019 Florida Department of Health Prepared in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 2019 Florida Fish Advisories • Table 1: Eating Guidelines for Fresh Water Fish from Florida Waters (based on mercury levels) page 1-50 • Table 2: Eating Guidelines for Marine and Estuarine Fish from Florida Waters (based on mercury levels) page 51-52 • Table 3: Eating Guidelines for species from Florida Waters with Heavy Metals (other than mercury), Dioxin, Pesticides, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), or Saxitoxin Contamination page 53-54 Eating Fish is an important part of a healthy diet. Rich in vitamins and low in fat, fish contains protein we need for strong bodies. It is also an excellent source of nutrition for proper growth and development. In fact, the American Heart Association recommends that you eat two meals of fish or seafood every week. At the same time, most Florida seafood has low to medium levels of mercury. Depending on the age of the fish, the type of fish, and the condition of the water the fish lives in, the levels of mercury found in fish are different. While mercury in rivers, creeks, ponds, and lakes can build up in some fish to levels that can be harmful, most fish caught in Florida can be eaten without harm.
  • 5. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Data, Inventory, and Analysis

    5. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Data, Inventory, and Analysis

    CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS CONSERVATION ELEMENT 5. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Data, Inventory, and Analysis INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Conservation Element is to promote the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources within the City of Altamonte Springs. The objective of the Conservation Element Data Inventory and Analysis (DIA) Report is to document the conditions for various natural resources found within the City and identify key community priorities for conservation strategies. The DIA Report also examines the current and projected water needs for the community over the 20-year planning horizon (2030) to ensure adequate water supply is available to support future demands. Together, this information serves as the foundation for goals, objectives, and policies prepared to guide future development within the City of Altamonte Springs. DATA AND ANALYSIS This section addresses the data inventory and analysis requirements of §9J-5.013(1), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), supportive to the goals, objectives, policies and implementation programs for the Conservation Element. Natural resources may include water, wetlands, floodplains, groundwater, air, minerals, soil, wildlife, and vegetative resources. Surface Water Quality Surface water resources within the City of Altamonte Springs generally consist of the Little Wekiva River and several lakes. Little Wekiva River The Little Wekiva River flows north from Lake Lawne in Orange County through Lake Lotus and Trout Lake in Altamonte Springs. It continues to flow in a northerly direction at the City limits into one of the southern arms of the Wekiva Swamp and eventually on into the Wekiva River. Extensive urban development along the Little Wekiva River has resulted in a host of problems including increased rate of flow and velocities, minimal upstream stormwater storage and treatment due to development occurring before current stormwater regulations, erosion and flooding, and degradation of the river’s water quality from the movement and deposition of sediments.
  • Hydrology, Vegetation, and Soils of Four North Florida River Flood Plains with an Evaluation of State and Federal Wetland Determinations

    Hydrology, Vegetation, and Soils of Four North Florida River Flood Plains with an Evaluation of State and Federal Wetland Determinations

    Hydrology, Vegetation, and Soils of Four North Florida River Flood Plains with an Evaluation of State and Federal Wetland Determinations By Helen M. Light and Melanie R. Darst, U.S. Geological Survey; and Maureen T. MacLaughlin and Steven W. Sprecher, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Contents U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigation Report 93-4033 Prepared in cooperation with the FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION Tallahassee, Florida 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ROBERT M. HIRSCH, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Suite 3015 Open-File Reports Section 227 North Bronough Street Box 25286, MS 517 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Contents Glossary ................................................................................................................................................................................... VI Selected scientific and common plant names ........................................................................................................................VIII Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................................................1
  • 1 Introduction

    1 Introduction

    Final FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Water Resource Management, Bureau of Watershed Management NORTHWEST DISTRICT • OCHLOCKONEE–ST. MARKS BASIN Final TMDL Report Fecal Coliform TMDL for Black Creek, WBID 1024 Richard Wieckowicz, Ph.D., P.E. Erin G. Wilcox Ben Ralys September 29, 2008 Acknowledgments This analysis could not have been accomplished without significant contributions from staff in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Watershed Assessment Section. Editorial assistance was provided by Jan Mandrup-Poulsen and Linda Lord. Map production assistance was provided by Erin Wilcox. For additional information on the watershed management approach and impaired waters in the Black Creek Watershed, contact: Bonita Gorham Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management Watershed Planning and Coordination Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3565 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8513 Richard Wieckowicz, Ph.D., P.E. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management Watershed Assessment Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3565 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8468 Fax: (850) 245–8444 Access to all data used in the development of this report can be obtained by contacting Erin G. Wilcox Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management Watershed Assessment Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3555 Tallahassee,
  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Statewide Alligator Harvest Data Summary

    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Statewide Alligator Harvest Data Summary

    FWC Home : Wildlife & Habitats : Managed Species : Alligator Management Program FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION STATEWIDE ALLIGATOR HARVEST DATA SUMMARY YEAR AVERAGE LENGTH TOTAL HARVEST FEET INCHES 2000 8 8 2,552 2001 8 8.2 2,268 2002 8 3.7 2,164 2003 8 4.6 2,830 2004 8 5.8 3,237 2005 8 4.9 3,436 2006 8 4.8 6,430 2007 8 6.7 5,942 2008 8 5.1 6,204 2009 8 0 7,844 2010 7 10.9 7,654 2011 8 1.2 8,103 Provisional data 2000 STATEWIDE ALLIGATOR HARVEST DATA SUMMARY AVERAGE LENGTH TOTAL AREA NO AREA NAME FEET INCHES HARVEST 101 LAKE PIERCE 7 9.8 12 102 LAKE MARIAN 9 9.3 30 104 LAKE HATCHINEHA 8 7.9 36 105 KISSIMMEE RIVER (POOL A) 7 6.7 17 106 KISSIMMEE RIVER (POOL C) 8 8.3 17 109 LAKE ISTOKPOGA 8 0.5 116 110 LAKE KISSIMMEE 7 11.5 172 112 TENEROC FMA 8 6.0 1 402 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 2A & 2B) 8 8.2 12 404 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 3A & 3B) 8 10.4 63 405 HOLEY LAND WMA 9 11.0 2 500 BLUE CYPRESS LAKE 8 5.6 31 501 ST. JOHNS RIVER 1 8 2.2 69 502 ST. JOHNS RIVER 2 8 0.7 152 504 ST. JOHNS RIVER 4 8 3.6 83 505 LAKE HARNEY 7 8.7 65 506 ST. JOHNS RIVER 5 9 2.2 38 508 CRESCENT LAKE 8 9.9 23 510 LAKE JESUP 9 9.5 28 518 LAKE ROUSSEAU 7 9.3 32 520 LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA 9 7.1 47 547 GUANA RIVER WMA 9 4.6 5 548 OCALA WMA 9 8.7 4 549 THREE LAKES WMA 9 9.3 4 601 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (WEST) 8 11.7 448 602 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (NORTH) 9 1.8 163 603 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (EAST) 8 6.8 38 604 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (SOUTH) 8 5.2 323 711 LAKE HANCOCK 9 3.9 101 721 RODMAN RESERVOIR 8 7.0 118 722 ORANGE LAKE 8 9.3 125 723 LOCHLOOSA LAKE 9 3.4 56 734 LAKE SEMINOLE 9 1.5 16 741 LAKE TRAFFORD
  • Upper Etonia Creek Hydrologic Study Phase I Final Report

    Upper Etonia Creek Hydrologic Study Phase I Final Report

    Special Publication SJ 91-SP5 UPPER ETONIA CREEK HYDROLOGIC STUDY PHASE I FINAL REPORT from Louis H. Motz and James P. Heaney Faculty Investigators William K. Denton and Geoffrey Leiter Graduate Student Investigators Departments of Civil Engineering and Environmental Engineering Sciences University of Florida to Douglas A. Munch Project Manager St. Johns River Water Management District Palatka, Florida Contract Number 90G126 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iii LIST OF TABLES vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . vii 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Tasks 2 1.4 Acknowledgements 3 2.0 Regional Setting 4 2.1 Physiography 4 2.2 Water Management Problems 4 2.3 Climate 6 2.3.1 Precipitation 6 2.3.2 Evapotranspiration 10 2.4 Lakes 10 2.4.1 Florida Lakes 10 2.4.2 Lakes of the UECB 12 2.5 Hydrogeology 17 3.0 Compilation of Data 30 3.1 Availability of Data 30 3.2 Precipitation 30 3.3 Evaporation 37 3.4 Lakes . 39 3.4.1 Expected Variability in Stages for Florida Lakes .... 39 3.4.2 Very Stable Lakes-Blue Pond and Sand Hill Lake 43 3.4.3 Stable Lakes-Kingsley, Magnolia, Hall, and Smith Lakes . 43 3.4.4 Typical Florida Lakes-Swan Lake and Crystal Lake .... 46 3.4.5 Less Stable Lakes-Lake Johnson, Little Lake Johnson, and Lake Geneva 46 3.4.6 Unstable Lakes-Pebble Lake and Lake Brooklyn 48 3.5 Groundwater Levels 48 3.6 Water Use 53 4.0 Assessment of Long-Term Changes 60 4.1 Introduction 60 4.2 Precipitation and Evaporation 60 4.3 Surface Water 62 4.4 Groundwater 62 4.4.1 Changes in the Floridan Aquifer Potentiometric Surface .
  • American Shad Habitat Plan Update

    American Shad Habitat Plan Update

    American Shad Habitat Plan Update State of Florida Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Division of Marine Fisheries Management Reid Hyle [email protected] April 2021 Approved May 5, 2021 Introduction Amendment 3 to the Interstate Management Plan for Shad and River Herring cites habitat loss and degradation as major factors in the decline of and continued depression of populations of American Shad along the Atlantic coast and requires member states to develop habitat plans for American Shad in their jurisdiction. This plan is submitted to serve as the required habitat plan for the State of Florida. It outlines historic and current habitats available to American Shad in Florida and identifies known threats to those habitats as well as efforts to mitigate those threats. The primary spawning run of American shad in Florida historically was and currently is in the St. Johns River. The only other river lying within Florida in which spawning has been documented historically (Williams and Bruger 1972) and recently (Holder et al. 2011, Dutterer et al. 2011) is the Econlockhatchee River which is a tributary to the St. Johns River. The St. Marys River is along the eastern border between Georgia and Florida historically supported a population of American Shad. This plan includes these three systems. The Ocklawaha River is the largest tributary of the St. Johns River and is the largest Atlantic drainage river in Florida obstructed by a dam in its lower reaches. There is no record of a spawning run of American Shad in the Ocklawaha River pre-dating construction of the dam in 1968.