DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Statewide Alligator Harvest Data Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Statewide Alligator Harvest Data Summary FWC Home : Wildlife & Habitats : Managed Species : Alligator Management Program FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION STATEWIDE ALLIGATOR HARVEST DATA SUMMARY YEAR AVERAGE LENGTH TOTAL HARVEST FEET INCHES 2000 8 8 2,552 2001 8 8.2 2,268 2002 8 3.7 2,164 2003 8 4.6 2,830 2004 8 5.8 3,237 2005 8 4.9 3,436 2006 8 4.8 6,430 2007 8 6.7 5,942 2008 8 5.1 6,204 2009 8 0 7,844 2010 7 10.9 7,654 2011 8 1.2 8,103 Provisional data 2000 STATEWIDE ALLIGATOR HARVEST DATA SUMMARY AVERAGE LENGTH TOTAL AREA NO AREA NAME FEET INCHES HARVEST 101 LAKE PIERCE 7 9.8 12 102 LAKE MARIAN 9 9.3 30 104 LAKE HATCHINEHA 8 7.9 36 105 KISSIMMEE RIVER (POOL A) 7 6.7 17 106 KISSIMMEE RIVER (POOL C) 8 8.3 17 109 LAKE ISTOKPOGA 8 0.5 116 110 LAKE KISSIMMEE 7 11.5 172 112 TENEROC FMA 8 6.0 1 402 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 2A & 2B) 8 8.2 12 404 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 3A & 3B) 8 10.4 63 405 HOLEY LAND WMA 9 11.0 2 500 BLUE CYPRESS LAKE 8 5.6 31 501 ST. JOHNS RIVER 1 8 2.2 69 502 ST. JOHNS RIVER 2 8 0.7 152 504 ST. JOHNS RIVER 4 8 3.6 83 505 LAKE HARNEY 7 8.7 65 506 ST. JOHNS RIVER 5 9 2.2 38 508 CRESCENT LAKE 8 9.9 23 510 LAKE JESUP 9 9.5 28 518 LAKE ROUSSEAU 7 9.3 32 520 LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA 9 7.1 47 547 GUANA RIVER WMA 9 4.6 5 548 OCALA WMA 9 8.7 4 549 THREE LAKES WMA 9 9.3 4 601 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (WEST) 8 11.7 448 602 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (NORTH) 9 1.8 163 603 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (EAST) 8 6.8 38 604 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (SOUTH) 8 5.2 323 711 LAKE HANCOCK 9 3.9 101 721 RODMAN RESERVOIR 8 7.0 118 722 ORANGE LAKE 8 9.3 125 723 LOCHLOOSA LAKE 9 3.4 56 734 LAKE SEMINOLE 9 1.5 16 741 LAKE TRAFFORD 8 10.5 37 751 LAKE GEORGE 10 0.1 60 2001 STATEWIDE ALLIGATOR HARVEST DATA SUMMARY AVERAGE LENGTH TOTAL AREA NO AREA NAME FEET INCHES HARVEST 101 LAKE PIERCE 8 9.3 15 102 LAKE MARIAN 9 7.6 30 104 LAKE HATCHINEHA 7 7.2 45 105 KISSIMMEE RIVER (POOL A) 8 7.9 29 106 KISSIMMEE RIVER 8 6.2 37 108 LAKE ARBUCKLE 9 0.1 10 109 LAKE ISTOKPOGA 7 10.3 149 110 LAKE KISSIMMEE 8 0.1 142 112 TENEROC FMA 10 6 4 115 LAKE WEOHYAKAPKA 11 4 2 116 CYPRESS LAKE 8 11.3 4 117 LAKE PARKER 9 3.5 2 118 LAKE MANATEE 9 3.5 2 119 PEACE RIVER NORTH 6 7 3 120 PEACE RIVER SOUTH 9 0.5 2 121 CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER 7 10.3 3 303 LAKE MICCOSUKEE 7 9.6 11 402 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 2A & 2B) 8 10.1 15 404 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 3A & 3B) 8 9.9 85 405 HOLEY LAND WMA 9 3.4 10 500 BLUE CYPRESS LAKE 9 5.3 38 501 ST. JOHNS RIVER (L. HELL N' BLAZES) 8 3.8 122 502 ST. JOHNS RIVER (LAKE POINSETT) 7 9.2 137 504 ST. JOHNS RIVER (PUZZLE LAKE) 7 9.4 74 505 LAKE HARNEY 7 10 64 506 ST. JOHNS RIVER (WELAKA) 8 2.7 43 507 ST. JOHNS RIVER (PALATKA SOUTH) 9 5.7 4 508 CRESCENT LAKE 8 7.8 21 510 LAKE JESUP 10 3.4 28 515 LAKE PANASOFFKEE 8 7.8 10 516 WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER NORTH 8 1.6 5 518 LAKE ROUSSEAU 7 3.1 38 520 LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA 9 1.2 50 527 LAKE MONROE 10 3.7 10 528 LAKE DEXTER 10 3.3 6 540 ST. JOHNS R. UPPER BASIN CANALS 9 1.8 27 542 BLUE CYPRESS WATER MGT AREA 8 11.1 9 544 STICK MARSH 10 5.1 28 545 KENANSVILLE LAKE 10 7.3 6 546 T.M. GOODWIN WMA 8 5.1 14 547 GUANA RIVER WMA 7 1.3 3 548 OCALA WMA 7 9.5 2 601 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (WEST) 9 3.9 289 602 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (NORTH) 9 11.3 84 603 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (EAST) 9 2.9 49 604 LAKE OKEECHOBEE (SOUTH) 9 2.3 155 721 RODMAN RESERVOIR 8 1.7 134 723 LOCHLOOSA LAKE 9 2.8 50 733 LAKE TALQUIN 8 11.7 7 734 LAKE SEMINOLE 8 11.6 17 741 LAKE TRAFFORD 8 9 49 751 LAKE GEORGE 9 0.7 89 2002 STATEWIDE ALLIGATOR HARVEST DATA SUMMARY AVERAGE LENGTH TOTAL AREA NO AREA NAME FEET INCHES HARVEST 101 LAKE PIERCE 8 5.7 16 102 LAKE MARIAN 8 11.9 30 104 LAKE HATCHINEHA 7 9.0 41 105 KISSIMMEE RIVER (POOL A) 7 11.3 20 106 KISSIMMEE RIVER 7 9.5 62 108 LAKE ARBUCKLE 8 10.9 10 109 LAKE ISTOKPOGA 8 1.2 125 110 LAKE KISSIMMEE 7 10.1 143 112 TENEROC FMA 9 0.5 4 115 LAKE WEOHYAKAPKA 10 5.0 4 116 CYPRESS LAKE 8 8.7 3 117 LAKE PARKER 8 10.5 2 118 LAKE MANATEE 9 1.0 1 119 PEACE RIVER NORTH 6 9.7 3 120 PEACE RIVER SOUTH 8 1.0 1 303 LAKE MICCOSUCKEE 7 9.3 8 402 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 2A & 2B) 8 7.2 14 404 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 3A & 3B) 8 7.0 75 405 HOLEY LAND WMA 8 3.9 9 409 LAKE HICPOCHEE 8 2.1 9 500 BLUE CYPRESS LAKE 8 0.0 23 501 ST. JOHNS RIVER (L. HELL N' BLAZES) 8 5.5 100 502 ST. JOHNS RIVER (LAKE POINSETT) 7 9.6 119 504 ST. JOHNS RIVER (PUZZLE LAKE) 7 0.1 85 505 LAKE HARNEY 7 11.7 57 506 ST. JOHNS RIVER (WELAKA) 8 5.8 45 507 ST. JOHNS RIVER (PALATKA SOUTH) 9 4.0 6 508 CRESCENT LAKE 8 4.2 25 510 LAKE JESUP 9 10.7 22 512 LAKES DORA AND BEAUCLAIR 8 11.9 17 515 LAKE PANASOFFKEE 7 4.6 10 516 WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER NORTH 7 5.0 1 518 LAKE ROUSSEAU 8 3.9 34 520 LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA 8 7.9 55 527 LAKE MONROE 9 11.5 6 528 LAKE DEXTER 10 8.3 6 540 ST. JOHNS R. UPPER BASIN CANALS 9 6.9 32 542 BLUE CYPRESS WATER MGT AREA 9 5.7 6 544 STICK MARSH 10 1.9 28 545 KENANSVILLE LAKE 10 3.6 8 546 T.M. GOODWIN WMA 8 9.3 15 547 GUANA RIVER WMA 7 5.5 2 548 OCALA WMA 8 11.7 3 549 THREE LAKES WMA 9 9.0 6 601 LAKE OKEECHOBEE WEST 8 4.3 181 602 LAKE OKEECHOBEE NORTH 8 2.4 75 603 LAKE OKEECHOBEE EAST 8 9.4 54 604 LAKE OKEECHOBEE SOUTH 8 1.4 143 2002 STATEWIDE ALLIGATOR HARVEST DATA SUMMARY AVERAGE LENGTH TOTAL AREA NO AREA NAME FEET INCHES HARVEST 711 LAKE HANCOCK 8 4.4 106 721 RODMAN RESERVOIR 7 7.2 98 723 LOCHLOOSA LAKE 8 8.3 46 732 LAKE IAMONIA 7 10.1 10 733 LAKE TALQUIN 8 1.9 8 734 LAKE SEMINOLE 9 5.6 22 741 LAKE TRAFFORD 8 5.8 49 751 LAKE GEORGE 9 4.0 72 2003 STATEWIDE ALLIGATOR HARVEST DATA SUMMARY AVERAGE LENGTH TOTAL AREA NO AREA NAME FEET INCHES HARVEST 101 LAKE PIERCE 7 10.2 12 102 LAKE MARIAN 9 7.2 26 104 LAKE HATCHINEHA 7 8.2 44 105 KISSIMMEE RIVER (POOL A) 7 3.3 11 106 KISSIMMEE RIVER 7 3.5 56 108 LAKE ARBUCKLE 8 2.6 8 109 LAKE ISTOKPOGA 7 9.4 116 110 LAKE KISSIMMEE 7 11.9 138 112 TENEROC FMA 9 4 4 115 LAKE WEOHYAKAPKA 9 3.8 4 116 CYPRESS LAKE 9 10.3 4 118 LAKE MANATEE 8 9.5 2 119 PEACE RIVER NORTH 6 7.7 3 120 PEACE RIVER SOUTH 6 8.3 3 121 CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER 10 2 2 303 LAKE MICCOSUCKEE 7 2 2 306 WACISSA RIVER 9 9 2 402 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 2A & 2B) 8 8.1 20 404 EVERGLADES WMA (WCAs 3A & 3B) 8 7.9 87 405 HOLEY LAND WMA 7 2.8 4 409 LAKE HICPOCHEE 6 11.9 11 500 BLUE CYPRESS LAKE 8 4.7 26 501 ST. JOHNS RIVER (L. HELL N' BLAZES) 7 8.2 108 502 ST. JOHNS RIVER (LAKE POINSETT) 7 7.7 143 504 ST. JOHNS RIVER (PUZZLE LAKE) 7 6.8 89 505 LAKE HARNEY 8 2.2 32 506 ST. JOHNS RIVER (WELAKA) 8 6.1 41 507 ST. JOHNS RIVER (PALATKA SOUTH) 8 9.8 4 508 CRESCENT LAKE 8 5.8 23 510 LAKE JESUP 9 11.2 26 512 LAKES DORA AND BEAUCLAIR 8 10 11 515 LAKE PANASOFFKEE 8 3 7 516 WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER NORTH 7 9 1 518 LAKE ROUSSEAU 7 1.4 45 520 LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA 8 8.5 40 527 LAKE MONROE 9 1.9 8 528 LAKE DEXTER 10 7.8 5 540 ST. JOHNS RIVER UPPER BASIN CANALS 9 3.7 30 542 BLUE CYPRESS WATER MGT AREA 9 4.4 8 543 T.M. GOODWIN WMA (BROADMOOR UNIT) 8 3.7 22 544 STICK MARSH 10 2 26 545 KENANSVILLE LAKE 10 8.9 8 546 T.M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Publication SJ92-SP16 LAKE JESSUP RESTORATION
    Special Publication SJ92-SP16 LAKE JESSUP RESTORATION DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION HATER BUDGET AND NUTRIENT BUDGET Prepared for: ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, Florida Prepared By: Douglas H. Keesecker HATER AND AIR RESEARCH, INC. Gainesville, Florida May 1992 File: 91-5057 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page 1 of 2) Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE 1-1 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA 1-2 2.0 DATA COMPILATION 2-1 2.1 HISTORICAL DATA 2-1 2.1.1 Previous Studies 2-1 2.1.2 Climatoloqic Data 2-3 2.1.3 Hydrologic Data 2-4 2.1.4 Land Use and Cover Data 2-6 2.1.5 On-site Sewage Disposal System (OSDS) Data 2-8 2.1.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP1 Data 2-9 2.1.7 Surface Water Quality Data . 2-10 3.0 WATER BUDGET 3-1 3.1 METHODOLOGY 3-1 3.1.1 Springflow and Upward Leakage 3-2 3.1.2 Direct Precipitation 3-4 3.1.3 Land Surface Runoff 3-4 3.1.4 Shallow Groundwater Inflow 3-6 3.1.5 Septic Tank (OSDS1 Inflows 3-7 3.1.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent 3-8 3.1.7 Surface Evaporation 3-8 3.1.8 Surface Water Outflows 3-9 3.2 RESULTS - WATER BUDGET 3-10 3.3 DISCUSSION 3-16 3.4 ESTIMATE OF ERROR 3-18 3.4.1 Sprinoflow and Upward Leakage 3-18 3.4.2 Direct Precipitation 3-19 3.4.3 Land Surface Runoff 3-19 3.4.4 Shallow Groundwater Inflow 3-20 3.4.5 Septic Tank (OSDS1 Inflows 3-21 3.4.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent 3-22 3.4.7 Surface Evaporation 3-22 3.4.8 Surface Water Outflows 3-22 LAKE JESSUP[WP]TOC 052192 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page 2 of 2) Section Page 4.0 NUTRIENT BUDGETS 4-1 4.1 METHODOLOGY 4-1 4.1.1 Direct Precipitation Loading 4-2 4.1.2 Land Surface Runoff Loading 4-3 4.1.3 Shallow Groundwater Inflow Loading 4-3 4.1.4 Septic Tank Loading 4-4 4.1.5 Wastewater Treatment Plant Loading 4-4 4.1.6 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue-Green Algal Bloom Weekly Update Reporting June 26 - July 1, 2020
    BLUE-GREEN ALGAL BLOOM WEEKLY UPDATE REPORTING JUNE 26 - JULY 1, 2020 SUMMARY There were 14 reported site visits in the past six days (6/26-7/1), with 16 samples collected. Algal bloom conditions were observed by the samplers at 11 sites. Satellite imagery from 6/29 shows bloom potential in Lake Okeechobee on approximately 45% coverage concentrated in the center of the lake, while visible portions of the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie rivers and estuaries show no observable bloom activity. Over the course of the week, the area of potential algal bloom has decreased in open waters and intensified along the northwestern and northeastern shorelines. Satellite imagery from 6/29 for the St. Johns River is partially obscured by cloud cover, but shows little bloom potential in visible portions of Lake George or on the mainstem of the St. Johns River downstream of Lake George. The imagery indicates there may be an uptick on some of the lakes associated with the St. Johns River System. Please keep in mind that bloom potential is subject to change due to rapidly changing environmental conditions or satellite inconsistencies (i.e., wind, rain, temperature or stage). On 6/29, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) staff sampled the C43 Canal – Upstream of S77, C43 – Upstream of S79 and Lake Okeechobee – S308C (Lakeside). The Lake Okeechobee – S308C sample and C43 Canal – Upstream of S79 were both dominated by Microcystis aeruginosa, while the C43 Canal – Upstream of S77 had no dominant algal taxon. No cyanotoxins were detected in these three samples. On 6/29, the St.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. Forest Service Forest Health Protection Gypsy Moth Catches On
    U. S. Forest Service Forest Health Protection 11/19/2014 Gypsy Moth Catches on Federal Lands 1 Alabama 2014 2013 Traps Positive Moths Traps Positive Moths Agency/Facility Deployed Traps Trapped Deployed Traps Trapped ACOE WALTER F. GEORGE LAKE, AL 5 0 0 5 0 0 WEST POINT LAKE, AL 3 0 0 3 0 0 F&WS MOUNTAIN LONGLEAF NWR 4 0 0 4 0 0 State total: 12 0 0 12 0 0 U. S. Forest Service Forest Health Protection 11/19/2014 Gypsy Moth Catches on Federal Lands 2 Florida 2014 2013 Traps Positive Moths Traps Positive Moths Agency/Facility Deployed Traps Trapped Deployed Traps Trapped USAF EGLIN AFB 28 0 0 0 0 0 F&WS CHASSAHOWITZKA NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 FLORIDA PANTHER NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 J.N. DING DARLING NWR 6 0 0 6 0 0 LAKE WOODRUFF NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 LOWER SUWANNEE NWR 4 0 0 4 0 0 LOXAHATCHEE NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 MERRITT ISLAND NWR 6 0 0 6 0 0 ST. MARKS NWR 10 0 0 5 0 0 ST. VINCENT NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 NPS BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVE 5 0 0 5 0 0 DE SOTO NATIONAL MEMORIAL 5 0 0 5 0 0 EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK 5 0 0 5 0 0 FT. CAROLINE NATIONAL MEMORIAL 6 0 0 6 0 0 FT. MATANZAS NM 12 0 0 4 0 0 GULF ISLANDS NATIONAL SEASHORE 18 0 0 5 0 0 TIMUCUAN ECOLOGICAL & HISTORIC PRESERVE 12 1 1 6 0 0 USFS Apalachicola NF APALACHICOLA RANGER DISTRICT 10 0 0 10 0 0 WAKULLA RANGER DISTRICT 20 0 0 20 0 0 Ocala NF LAKE GEORGE RANGER DISTRICT 44 0 0 18 1 1 SEMINOLE RANGER DISTRICT 14 0 0 14 0 0 Osceola NF OSCEOLA RANGER DISTRICT 15 0 0 15 0 0 US NAVY PENSACOLA NAS 30 0 0 0 0 0 State total: 265 1 1 159 1 1 U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caloosahatchee River Estuary: a Monitoring Partnership Between Federal, State, and Local Governments, 2007–13
    Prepared in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the South Florida Water Management District The Caloosahatchee River Estuary: A Monitoring Partnership Between Federal, State, and Local Governments, 2007–13 By Eduardo Patino The tidal Caloosahatchee River and downstream estuaries also known as S–79 (fig. 2), which are operated by the USGS (fig. 1) have substantial environmental, recreational, and economic in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lee value for southwest Florida residents and visitors. Modifications to County, and the City of Cape Coral. Additionally, a monitor- the Caloosahatchee River watershed have altered the predevelop- ing station was operated on Sanibel Island from 2010 to 2013 ment hydrology, thereby threatening the environmental health of (fig. 1) as part of the USGS Greater Everglades Priority Eco- estuaries in the area (South Florida Water Management District, system Science initiative and in partnership with U.S. Fish and 2014). Hydrologic monitoring of the freshwater contributions from Wildlife Service (J.N. Ding Darling National Wildlife Ref- tributaries to the tidal Caloosahatchee River and its estuaries is uge). Moving boat water-quality surveys throughout the tidal necessary to adequately describe the total freshwater inflow and Caloosahatchee River and downstream estuaries began in 2011 constituent loads to the delicate estuarine system. and are ongoing. Information generated by these monitoring From 2007 to 2013, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in networks has proved valuable to the FDEP for developing total cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protec- maximum daily load criteria, and to the SFWMD for calibrat- tion (FDEP) and the South Florida Water Management District ing and verifying a hydrodynamic model.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Ochlockonee River Paddling Guide
    F ll o r ii d a D e s ii g n a tt e d ¯ P a d d ll ii n g T r a ii ll s U p p e r O c h ll o c k o n e e R ii v e r G E O R G I A U p p e rr O c h ll o c k o n e e R ii v e rr P a d d ll ii n g T rr a ii ll M a p 1 159 «¬12 )" Hinson )"157 343 Lake Iamonia )" «¬267 Havana «¬12 344 Quincy )" ¤£319 342 GADSDEN U p p e rr O c h ll o c k o n e e R ii v e rr «¬ P a d d ll ii n g T rr a ii ll M a p 2 Bradfordville 90 ¤£ 27 ¤£ Lake Jackson Midway «¬263 ¨¦§10 1)"541 Capitola TALLAHASSEE Lake Talquin «¬20 «¬267 ¤£27 LEON ¤£319 Bloxham )"259 «¬267 Woodville Helen Designated Paddling Trail )"61 Wetlands ¤£319 Water WAKULLA Designated Paddling Trail Index 0 2.5 5 10 Miles 319 ¤£ 61 Newport Arran )" U p p e rr O c h ll o c k o n e e R ii v e rr P a d d ll ii n g T rr a ii ll M a p 1 ¯ Bell Rd d R d or n c Co o ir a C !| River Ridge «¬12 Plantation Concord Conservation Easement Access Point 1: SR 12 N: 30.6689 W: -84.3051 Havana Hiamonee à Plantation Conservation «¬12 Easement River Ridge Plantation C Conservation o n c Easement o d r R d n a R i id d r e M Kemp Rd N E D Tall Timbers Research Station S D & Land Conservancy A N O G E L Lake Iamonia I ro n B r id g e R d d Pond R ard ch Or !| Mallard Pond Access Point 2: Old Bainbridge Rd Bridge N: 30.5858 W: -84.3594 O l d B Carr Lake a i n b r i d Upper Ochlockonee River Paddling Trail g e R Canoe/Kayak Launch d !| Conservation Lands 27 0 0.5 1 2 Miles ¤£ Wetlands ¯ U p p e rr O c h ll o c k o n e e R ii v e rr P a d d ll ii n g T rr a ii ll M a p 2 )"270 RCM Farms Conservation Easement O l d B a i
    [Show full text]
  • Final Summary Document of Public Scoping Comments Submitted by the 3/31/11 Deadline
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Proposed Everglades Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge and Conservation Area Summary of Public Scoping Comments - as of 3.31.2011 Comments were submitted in a variety of ways (e.g., at a public scoping meeting and by mail, fax, and email). Attendance at the public scoping meetings averaged ~440 per meeting: ~200 in Sebring, ~325 in Kissimmee, ~665 in Okeechobee, and ~580 in Vero Beach. As of March 31, 2011, the deadline for public scoping comments, over 38,000 written comments had been received. The comments were summarized and are grouped together by topic, as listed. • Wildlife and Habitat • Resource Protection • Recreation • Administration • General/Other Comments List of acronyms used in comments: BLM Bureau of Land Management CERP Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan DEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection DOI U.S. Department of Interior DOT Florida Department of Transportation EH Everglades Headwaters ESV Ecosystem Services Values FDOT Florida Department of Transportation FWC Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, also USFWS LOPP Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NPS National Park Service NRC National Research Council NWR National Wildlife Refuge PES Payments for Ecosystem Services SFWMD South Florida Water Management District STA Stormwater Treatment Area TEV Total Economic Value TNC The Nature Conservancy USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, also FWS Wildlife and Habitat General • If worried about the environment, we had more endangered species than anywhere in the State. We have the same amount of endangered species. We are good land stewards, so we don’t need the government or anything else.
    [Show full text]
  • Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8C: St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee River Watersheds Annual Report
    2019 South Florida Environmental Report – Volume I Chapter 8C Chapter 8C: St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee River Watersheds Annual Report Cassondra Armstrong, Fawen Zheng, Anna Wachnicka, Amanda Khan, Zhiqiang Chen, and Lucia Baldwin SUMMARY A description of the estuaries and the river watersheds is followed by a summary of the conditions of the hydrology (rainfall and flow), water quality (salinity, phosphorus, nitrogen, and chlorophyll a [Chla]), and aquatic habitat (oysters and submerged aquatic vegetation [SAV]) based on results of the Research and Water Quality Monitoring Programs (RWQMPs). Following the summary for each estuary, significant findings during the Water Year 2018 (WY2018; May 1, 2017–April 30, 2018) reporting period are highlighted. In addition, the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee river watersheds’ water quality monitoring results for total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) by basin are presented in Appendix 8C-1 of this volume as supplemental information. ST. LUCIE ESTUARY WY2018 total annual rainfall across the Tier 1 Contributing Areas (Lake Okeechobee, St. Lucie Basin, and Tidal Basin) to the St. Lucie Estuary (SLE) was more than the long-term average from WY1997 through WY2018. Although 74% of the annual rainfall usually occurs in the wet season, this value increased to 80% in WY2018. The relatively high amount of wet season rain was the driver for increased discharge to the SLE. The total annual freshwater inflow to the SLE in WY2018 (1.6 million acre-feet [ac-ft]) was higher than the long-term average of 1.0 million ac-ft. The inflow and percent contribution from Lake Okeechobee in WY2018 (0.6 million ac-ft and 37%, respectively) were greater than the long-term averages (0.3 million ac-ft and 26%, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Perspective on the Kissimmee River Restoration Project
    ing of 14 km of river channel, and removal of two water­ An Historical control structures and associated levees. Restoration of the Kissimmee River ecosystem will result in the reestablish­ ment of 104 km2 of river-floodplain ecosystem, including Perspective on the 70 km of river channel and 11,000 ha of wetland habitat, which is expected to benefit over 320 species of fish and Kissimmee River wildlife. Restoration Project Background he Kissimmee River basin is located in central Florida Tbetween the city of Orlando and lake Okeechobee Joseph W. Koebel, Jr.1 within the Coastal Lowlands physiographic province. It con­ sists of a 4229-km2 upper basin, which includes Lake Kis­ Abstract simmee and 18 smaller lakes ranging in size from a few hec­ tares to 144 km2, and a 1,963-km2 lower basin, which This paper reviews the events leading to the channeliza­ includes the tributary watersheds (excluding Lake Istok­ tion of the Kissimmee River, the physical, hydrologic, and poga) of the Kissimmee River between lake Kissimmee and biological effects of channelization, and the restoration lake Okeechobee. The physiography of the region includes movement. Between 1962 and 1971, in order to provide the Osceola and Okeechobee Plains and the Lake Wales flood control for central and southern florida, the 166 ridge of the Wicomico shore (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers km-Iong meandering Kissimmee River was transformed 1992). into a 90 km-Iong, 10 meter-deep, 100 meter-wide canal. Prior to channelization, the Kissimmee River meandered Channelization and transformation of the Kissimmee River approximately 166 km within a 1.5-3-km-wide floodplain.
    [Show full text]
  • LOWRP Draft PIR/EIS Annex C
    COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN LAKE OKEECHOBEE WATERSHED RESTORATION PROJECT DRAFT INTEGRATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT July 2018 Annex C Annex C Draft Project Operating Manual ANNEX C DRAFT PROJECT OPERATING MANUAL LOWRP Draft PIR and EIS July 2018 Annex C-i Annex C Draft Project Operating Manual This page intentionally left blank. LOWRP Draft PIR and EIS July 2018 Annex C-ii Annex C Draft Project Operating Manual Table of Contents C DRAFT PROJECT OPERATING MANUAL .................................................................... C-1 C.1 General Project Purposes, Goals, Objectives, and Benefits ................................... C-1 C.2 Project Features .................................................................................................. C-1 C.2.1 Existing Features ..................................................................................... C-2 C.2.2 Proposed Features .................................................................................. C-3 C.3 Project Relationships ........................................................................................... C-6 C.4 Major Constraints ................................................................................................ C-7 C.4.1 Paradise run ............................................................................................ C-8 C.4.2 Existing Legal Users, Levels of Flood Damage Reduction, and Water Quality ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Plan for Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Tributaries (EPKOET)
    Environmental Plan for Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Tributaries (EPKOET) Stephanie Bazan, Larissa Gaul, Vanessa Huber, Nicole Paladino, Emily Tulsky April 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY…………………...………………………………………..4 2. MISSION STATEMENT…………………………………....…………………………………7 3. GOVERNANCE……………………………………………………………………...………...8 4. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL POLICIES…………………………………………..…..10 5. PROBLEMS AND GOALS…..……………………………………………………………....12 6. SCHEDULE…………………………………....……………………………………………...17 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………………....17 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………..……………………....18 2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure A. Map of the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Watershed…………………………...4 Figure B. Phosphorus levels surrounding the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Watershed…..5 Figure C. Before and after backfilling of the Kissimmee river C-38 canal……………………….6 Figure D. Algae bloom along the St. Lucie River………………………………………………...7 Figure E. Florida’s Five Water Management Districts………………………………………........8 Figure F. Three main aquifer systems in southern Florida……………………………………....14 Figure G. Effect of levees on the watershed………………………………………...…………...15 Figure H. Algal bloom in the KOE watershed…………………………………………...………15 Figure I: Canal systems south of Lake Okeechobee……………………………………………..16 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Primary Problems in the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades watershed……………...13 Table 2: Schedule for EPKOET……………………………………………………………….…18 3 1. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades watershed is an area of about
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Historical Uarterly
    The Florida Historical uarterly APRIL 1970 PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FRONT COVER “A View of Pensacola in West Florida” is a black and white engraving published and dedicated by George Gauld to Sir William Burnaby, rear admiral and commander of the British fleet at Jamaica. From the British ensigns on the vessels and the flag flying from the flagstaff, this is obviously a picture of Pensacola during the British period. Since Gauld’s name is not mentioned in any reference sources as an engraver, and since such a skill is not mentioned in his book, it is unlikely that he was the engraver of this picture, but he probably drew the sketch of the scene from which it was made. The engraving is in the Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress. Gauld, surveyor of the coasts of Florida, was born in 1732 at Ardbrack, Bamffshire, and he was educated at King’s College, Aberdeen. In 1763 he was appointed to make a survey of all newly acquired English territory in the West Indies, and in March of the following year he sailed aboard the Tartar for Jamaica to join Burnaby’s fleet. In August 1764 he accompanied Sir John Lindsay to Pensacola and he may have made a sketch of the harbor at that time. He was a friend of Philip Pittman, author of The Present State of the European Settlements on the Mississippi . (1770), and Thomas Hutchins whose An Historical Narrative and Topogaphical Description of Louisiana, and West-Florida was published in 1784. They helped him draft charts and plans of West Florida.
    [Show full text]