Special Publication SJ92-SP16 LAKE JESSUP RESTORATION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Special Publication SJ92-SP16 LAKE JESSUP RESTORATION Special Publication SJ92-SP16 LAKE JESSUP RESTORATION DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION HATER BUDGET AND NUTRIENT BUDGET Prepared for: ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, Florida Prepared By: Douglas H. Keesecker HATER AND AIR RESEARCH, INC. Gainesville, Florida May 1992 File: 91-5057 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page 1 of 2) Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE 1-1 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA 1-2 2.0 DATA COMPILATION 2-1 2.1 HISTORICAL DATA 2-1 2.1.1 Previous Studies 2-1 2.1.2 Climatoloqic Data 2-3 2.1.3 Hydrologic Data 2-4 2.1.4 Land Use and Cover Data 2-6 2.1.5 On-site Sewage Disposal System (OSDS) Data 2-8 2.1.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP1 Data 2-9 2.1.7 Surface Water Quality Data . 2-10 3.0 WATER BUDGET 3-1 3.1 METHODOLOGY 3-1 3.1.1 Springflow and Upward Leakage 3-2 3.1.2 Direct Precipitation 3-4 3.1.3 Land Surface Runoff 3-4 3.1.4 Shallow Groundwater Inflow 3-6 3.1.5 Septic Tank (OSDS1 Inflows 3-7 3.1.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent 3-8 3.1.7 Surface Evaporation 3-8 3.1.8 Surface Water Outflows 3-9 3.2 RESULTS - WATER BUDGET 3-10 3.3 DISCUSSION 3-16 3.4 ESTIMATE OF ERROR 3-18 3.4.1 Sprinoflow and Upward Leakage 3-18 3.4.2 Direct Precipitation 3-19 3.4.3 Land Surface Runoff 3-19 3.4.4 Shallow Groundwater Inflow 3-20 3.4.5 Septic Tank (OSDS1 Inflows 3-21 3.4.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent 3-22 3.4.7 Surface Evaporation 3-22 3.4.8 Surface Water Outflows 3-22 LAKE JESSUP[WP]TOC 052192 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page 2 of 2) Section Page 4.0 NUTRIENT BUDGETS 4-1 4.1 METHODOLOGY 4-1 4.1.1 Direct Precipitation Loading 4-2 4.1.2 Land Surface Runoff Loading 4-3 4.1.3 Shallow Groundwater Inflow Loading 4-3 4.1.4 Septic Tank Loading 4-4 4.1.5 Wastewater Treatment Plant Loading 4-4 4.1.6 St. Johns River Inflow 4-4 4.1.7 Artesian Inflows 4-5 4.1.8 Nutrient Pool in Lake Waters 4-5 4.1.9 Surface Water Outflow 4-6 4.1.10 Nutrient Pools in Lake Sediments 4-6 4.1.11 Denitrification in Sediments 4-7 4.1.12 Nutrient Exchange with Lake Sediments 4-8 4.2 RESULTS - NUTRIENT BUDGET 4-9 4.2.1 Total Nitrogen Loadings 4-10 4.2.2 Total Phosphorus Loadings 4-11 4.2.3 Lake Jessup Nutrient Pools and Exports 4-12 4.3 NUTRIENT BUDGET DISCUSSION 4-14 4.4 ESTIMATE OF ERROR 4-20 4.4.1 Sprinoflow and Upward Leakage 4-20 4.4.2 Direct Precipitation 4-21 4.4.3 Land Surface Runoff ..... 4-21 4.4.4 Shallow Groundwater Inflow 4-22 4.4.5 Septic Tank (OSDS1 Inflows 4-22 4.4.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent 4-23 4.4.7 Denitrification 4-23 4.4.8 St. Johns River Loading 4-23 4.4.9 Lake Jessup Nutrient Concentrations 4-23 4.4.10 Lake Jessup Sediment Nutrient Concentrations 4-24 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 5-1 6.0 REFERENCES 6-1 LAKE JESSUP[WP]TOC 052192 LIST OF FIGURES After Figure Page 1.0-1 Location of Lake Jessup in East Central Florida 1-1 1.0-2 Location of Lake Jessup in Seminole County, Florida 1-1 1.2-1 Location of Lake Jessup Watershed Subbasins 1-2 2.1.2-1 Monthly Totals for Sanford Rainfall and Lisbon 2-3 Pan Evaporation in the Vicinity of Lake Jessup, 1/80 to 12/90 2.1.2-2 Average Monthly Lake Jessup Evaporation, Sanford Rainfall, 2-3 and Lisbon Pan Evaporation, January 1980 to December 1990 2.1.2-3 Average Monthly Urban Evapotranspiration, Natural 2-4 Evapotranspiration, and Adjusted Urban-Natural Average, January 1980 to December 1990 2.1.3-1 Location of USGS Stream and Lake Gaging Stations in the 2-4 Vicinity of Lake Jessup 2.1.3-2 Lake Jessup Stage and Estimated Stage of St. Johns River 2-5 at the Mouth of Lake Jessup 2.1.6-1 Location of Waste Water Treatment Plants in the 2-10 Lake Jessup Watershed 2.1.7-1 Location of Surface Water Quality Stations in the 2-10 Lake Jessup Watershed 3.2-1 Schematic Diagram of Lake Jessup Water Budget Components 3-10 with Average Annual Flows (acre-ft/yr) and Volumes (acre-ft) 3.2-1 Comparison of Average Subbasin Net Inflows and Direct Lake 3-11 Inflows and Outflows to Lake Jessup 3.2-2 Contribution of Individual Annual Inflows to Annual Total 3-12 Inflow into Lake Jessup 3.2-3 Annual Totals and Period of Record Annual Averages of 3-12 Individual Inflows to Lake Jessup 3.2-4 Monthly Totals of Individual Inflows to Lake Jessup for the 3-13 Period 1/80 to 12/90 3.2-5 Monthly "Total Infiltration, Precipitation, Evaporation and 3-13 Bank Seepage to Lake Jessup 3.2-6 Contribution of Annual Direct Evaporation and Annual 3-14 Lake Jessup Outflow to St. Johns River LAKE JESSUP[WP]LOF 052192 LIST OF FIGURES After Figure Page 3.2-7 Annual Totals and Period of Record Annual Averages of 3-14 Individual Outflows from Lake Jessup and Annual Average Lake Volume 3.2-8 Monthly Totals of Individual Outflows from Lake Jessup 3-15 and Monthly Average Lake Volume 3.2-9 Lake Jessup Total Annual Inflows and Outflows 3-15 3.2-10 Lake Jessup Total Monthly Inflows and Total Monthly Outflows 3-15 3.2-11 Average Monthly Total Inflow, Total Outflow and Average 3-16 Lake Jessup Volume, 1/80 to 12/90 4.1.10-1 Lake Jessup Sediment Sampling Locations Compiled from 4-6 the SJRWMD Water Quality Data Base 4.2-1 Schematic Diagram of Lake Jessup Nutrient Budget 4-9 Components with Average Annual Fluxes (tons N,P/yr) and Pools (tons N,P) 4.2.1-1 Relative Contribution of Total Nitrogen Sources to Annual 4-10 Total Nitrogen Loadings to Lake Jessup 4.2.1-2 Lake Jessup Annual Total Loadings from Total Nitrogen 4-11 Sources 4.2.2-1 Relative Contribution of Total Phosphorus Sources to Annual 4-11 Total Phosphorus Loadings into Lake Jessup 4.2.2-2 Lake Jessup Annual Total Loadings from Total Phosphorus 4-12 Sources 4.2.3-1 Lake Jessup Monthly Water Quality Values Used in Nutrient 4-12 Budget Calculations 4.2.3-2 Annual Total Nitrogen Exports from Lake Jessup for Period 4-13 of Record, 1/80 to 12/90 4.2.3-3 Relative Contribution of Total Nitrogen Exports to Annual 4-13 Total Nitrogen Export 4.2.3-4 Lake Jessup Annual Total Nitrogen Loadings and Exports for 4-13 Period of Record, 1/80 to 12/90 4.2.3-5 Lake Jessup Annual Total Phosphorus Loadings and Exports 4-13 4.2.3-6 Annual Average Total Nitrogen in Lake Jessup Sediments 4-14 4.2.3-7 Annual Average Total Phosphorus in Lake Jessup Sediments 4-14 LAKE JESSUP[WP]LOF 052192 LIST OF TABLES After Table Page 2.1.2-1 Period of Record Monthly Means for Rainfall, Pan 2-3 Evaporation, Evapotranspiration, Lake-Pan Evaporation Coefficients and Lake Evaporation, January 1980 to December 1990 2.1.3-1 Selected USGS Gaging Stations in the Lake Jessup Watershed 2-4 and Vicinity 2.1.3-2 Depth-Area-Volume Relationship for Lake Jessup 2-5 2.1.3-3 Runoff Coefficients for Subbasins GEESOLD and Howell 2-5 Calculated from Existing Hydrologic Data 2.1.4-1 Subbasin.Land Use Analyses for Composite Hydrologic 2-6 Characteristics 2.1.4-2 Determination of Land Use Based Runoff Nutrient Loading 2-7 Concentrations for the Lake Jessup Watershed 2.1.5-1 Estimated Distribution of Septic Tanks in the Lake Jessup 2-9 Watershed 2.1.6-1 Wastewater Treatment Plants that Discharge Within 2-9 Lake Jessup Watershed 2.1.6-2 Determination of Average Nitrogen and Phosphorus Effluent 2-10 Concentrations from Winter Springs and Casselberry Waste Water Treatment Plants 2.1.7-1 Summary of Surface Water Quality Data for Stations in the 2-10 Lake Jessup Watershed 3.1-1 Summary of Subbasins and Lake Constants and Characteristics 3-2 Used in the Water Budget Calculations 3.2-1 Inputs and Outputs to the Lake Jessup Annual Water Budget 3-10 from Artesian Sources and Meteorological sources and Sinks for the Years 1980 through 1990 with Monthly and Annual Means and Extremes 3.2-2 Inputs to the Lake Jessup Annual Water Budget from 3-11 Watershed Subbasins for the Years 1980 through 1990 with Monthly and Annual means and Extremes 3.2-3 Summary of Subbasin Net Annual Inflow to Lake Jessup with 3-11 Annual and Monthly Means and Extremes 3.2-4 Annual Inflow and Outflow Volumes and Percent Contribution 3-12 for Components of the Lake Jessup Water Budget with Period of Record Monthly and Annual Means and Extremes LAKE JESSUP[WP]LOT 052192 LIST OF TABLES After Table Page 4.1-1 Subbasin Characteristics and Nutrient Concentrations for 4-2 the Different Components of the Nutrient Budget 4.1.10-1 Summary of Mean Sediment Physical and Chemical 4-6 Characteristics for Lake Jessup 4.1.11-1 Estimates of Denitrification Rates in Sediments 4-8 4.2-1 Nitrogen Budget Summaries for Lake Jessup for the 4-10 Years 1980 through 1990 with Period of Record Monthly and Annual Means and Extremes 4.2-2 Phosphorus Budget Summaries for Lake Jessup for the 4-11 Years 1980 through 1990 with Period of Record Monthly and Annual Means and Extremes 4.2-3 Lake Jessup Water and Sediment Exchange Summaries for 4-12 the Years 1980 through 1990 with Period of Record Monthly and Annual Means and Extremes LAKE JESSUP[WP] LOT 052192 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lake Jessup is a large, shallow lake with an average stage (for years 1980 through 1990) of 1.86 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) that lies near the center of Seminole County in east-central Florida.
Recommended publications
  • Professional Paper SJ98-PP1
    Professional Paper SJ98-PP1 5ohns * A Professional Paper SJ98-PP1 THE UPPER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN PROJECT THE ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSFORMATION OF A PUBLIC FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT by Maurice Sterling Charles A. Padera St. Johns J^iver Water Management District Palatka, Florida 1998 Northwest Florida Water Management District anagement Southwest Florida Water Management District St. Johns River Water Management District South Florida Water Management District The St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) was created by the Florida Legislature in 1972 to be one of five water management districts in Florida. It includes all or part of 19 counties in northeast Florida. The mission of SJRWMD is to manage water resources to ensure their continued availability while maximizing both environmental and economic benefits. It accomplishes its mission through regulation; applied research; assistance to federal, state, and local governments; operation and maintenance of water control works; and land acquisition and management. Professional Papers are published to disseminate information collected by SJRWMD in pursuit of its mission. Copies of this report can be obtained from: Library St. Johns River Water Management District P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, FL 32178-1429 Phone: (904) 329-4132 Professional Paper SJ98-PP1 The Upper St. Johns River Basin Project The Environmental Transformation of a Public Flood Control Project Maurice Sterling and Charles A. Padera St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Florida ABSTRACT During the 1980s, the Upper St. Johns River Basin Project was transformed into a national model of modern floodplain management. The project is sponsored jointly by the St. Johns River Water Management District and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Sewage Effluent Removal on the Water Quality of Lake Howell, Florida
    University of Central Florida STARS Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 1986 The Effect of Sewage Effluent Removal on the Water Quality of Lake Howell, Florida Patricia L. Smith University of Central Florida Part of the Biology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/rtd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Smith, Patricia L., "The Effect of Sewage Effluent Removal on the Water Quality of Lake Howell, Florida" (1986). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4943. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/rtd/4943 THE EFFECT OF SEWAGE EFFLUENT REMOVAL ON THE WATER QUALITY OF LAKE HOWELL, FLORIDA BY PATRICIA LYNN SMITH B.A., Florida Technological University, 1973 B.S., University of Central Florida, 1982 THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology in the Graduate Studies Program of the College of Arts and Sciences University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 1986 ABSTRACT In April, 1983, sewage effluent discharge from the Maitland and Winter Park sewage treatment plants was diverted from Lake Howell to the Iron Bridge Regional Sewage Treatment Plant. The sewage treatment plants of the cities of Winter Park and Maitland had been discharging into Lake Howell since 1927 and 1962, respectively . These point sources had contributed 95% of the total phosphorous and 69% of the total nitrogen budgets for Lake Howell.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13Th) Edition
    Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13th) Edition T OF EN CO M M T M R E A R P C E E D U N A I C T I E R D E S M T A ATES OF U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RDML Timothy Gallaudet., Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management Cover image courtesy of Megan Greenaway—Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI III Preface Distances Between United States Ports is published by the Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. 883a and b), and the Act of 22 October 1968 (44 U.S.C. 1310). Distances Between United States Ports contains distances from a port of the United States to other ports in the United States, and from a port in the Great Lakes in the United States to Canadian ports in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Distances Between Ports, Publication 151, is published by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and distributed by NOS. NGA Pub. 151 is international in scope and lists distances from foreign port to foreign port and from foreign port to major U.S. ports. The two publications, Distances Between United States Ports and Distances Between Ports, complement each other.
    [Show full text]
  • William Selby Harney: Indian Fighter by OLIVER GRISWOLD We Are Going to Travel-In Our Imaginations-A South Florida Route with a Vivid Personality
    William Selby Harney: Indian Fighter By OLIVER GRISWOLD We are going to travel-in our imaginations-a South Florida route with a vivid personality. We are going back-in our imaginations-over a bloody trail. We are going on a dramatic military assignment. From Cape Florida on Key Biscayne, we start on the morning of De- cember 4, 1840. We cross the sparkling waters of Biscayne Bay to within a stone's throw of this McAllister Hotel where we are meeting. We are going up the Miami River in the days when there was no City of Miami. All our imaginations have to do is remove all the hotels from the north bank of the Miami River just above the Brickell Avenue bridge- then in the clearing rebuild a little military post that stood there more than a hundred years ago. At this tiny cluster of stone buildings called Ft. Dallas, our expedition pauses for farewells. We are going on up to the headwaters of the Miami River-and beyond-where no white man has ever been before. The first rays of the sun shed a ruddy light on a party of 90 picked U.S. soldiers. They are in long dugout canoes. The sunrise shines with particular emphasis on the fiery-red hair of a tall officer. It is as if the gleaming wand of destiny has reached down from the Florida skies this morning to put a special blessing on his perilous mission. He commands the flotilla to shove off. But before we join him on his quest for a certain villainous redskin, let us consider who this officer is.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(D), 305(B), and 314 Report and Listing Update
    2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314 Report and Listing Update Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection June 2020 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 floridadep.gov 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2020 This Page Intentionally Blank. Page 2 of 160 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2020 Letter to Floridians Ron DeSantis FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Governor Jeanette Nuñez Environmental Protection Lt. Governor Bob Martinez Center Noah Valenstein 2600 Blair Stone Road Secretary Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 June 16, 2020 Dear Floridians: It is with great pleasure that we present to you the 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida. This report meets the Federal Clean Water Act reporting requirements; more importantly, it presents a comprehensive analysis of the quality of our waters. This report would not be possible without the monitoring efforts of organizations throughout the state, including state and local governments, universities, and volunteer groups who agree that our waters are a central part of our state’s culture, heritage, and way of life. In Florida, monitoring efforts at all levels result in substantially more monitoring stations and water quality data than most other states in the nation. These water quality data are used annually for the assessment of waterbody health by means of a comprehensive approach. Hundreds of assessments of individual waterbodies are conducted each year. Additionally, as part of this report, a statewide water quality condition is presented using an unbiased random monitoring design. These efforts allow us to understand the state’s water conditions, make decisions that further enhance our waterways, and focus our efforts on addressing problems.
    [Show full text]
  • TMDL Report: Nutrient and Unionized Ammonia Tmdls for Lake Jesup, Wbids 2981 and 2981A
    FINAL 4/14/06 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Water Resource Management, Bureau of Watershed Management CENTRAL DISTRICT • MIDDLE ST. JOHNS BASIN TMDL Report Nutrient and Unionized Ammonia TMDLs for Lake Jesup, WBIDs 2981 and 2981A Xueqing Gao April 14, 2006 Executive Summary This report presents the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for nutrients and unionized ammonia for Lake Jesup (including Lake Jesup outlet), in the Middle St. Johns Basin. The lake was verified as impaired for nutrients and unionized ammonia due to elevated annual average Trophic State Index (TSI) values and exceedances of the unionized ammonia criterion (0.02 milligrams per liter [mg/L]), and was included on the Verified List of impaired waters for the Middle St. Johns Basin that was adopted by Secretarial Order on May 27, 2004. According to the 1999 Florida Watershed Restoration Act (FWRA), Chapter 99-223, Laws of Florida, once a waterbody is included on the Verified List, a TMDL must be developed. The purpose of the TMDL is to establish the allowable loadings of pollutants to Lake Jesup that would restore the waterbody so that it meets its applicable water quality criteria for nutrients and unionized ammonia. The nutrient TMDL for Lake Jesup was developed through four major steps: 1. Establish the TSI target 2. Model the existing nutrient load 3. Model the load that would achieve the TSI target (the TMDL) 4. Estimate the percent load reduction needed to meet the TMDL. To establish the TSI target, the Department first estimated the background TSI for the lake by comparing results from several methods, including a historic sedimentation rate method, literature published values, a TSI defined by the Florida Impaired Waters Rule, an Ecoregion approach, a hydrogeomorphologic method, and a model simulated background condition.
    [Show full text]
  • OCTOBER 2018 • 1 OASOAS Is Is Orange Audubon Society the Voice of Conservation in Central Florida Vol
    OCTOBER 2018 • 1 OASOAS is is Orange Audubon Society The Voice of Conservation in Central Florida Vol. 54 Issue 2 • October 2018 This Month’s Program: Fall Bird Walks: October 18, 2018 October 6, 13, 20, & 27, Coexisting with 2018, Mead Botanical Panthers Garden To celebrate fall migration, Orange by Dr. Jennifer Korn Although the Florida Panther is still Audubon Society (OAS) will host bird highly endangered, it is making a walks at Mead Botanical Garden on comeback, thanks to conserved land Saturdays, October 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2018. and conservation efforts. Most of the The October 20th walk will replace estimated 120 to 230 Florida Panthers the monthly field trip. The walks are live in South Florida. Orange Audubon free and open to the public with no Society’s October speaker, Dr. Jennifer registration needed. Each walk will be Korn, focuses on the ones in the rest of led by an experienced birding leader. the state. Walks start at 8:00 a.m. and will last 2 Previously only a few adventurous to 3 hours. The pace is slow with lots males crossed the Caloosahatchee of stopping to look at birds. River and traveled north in search of territory and mates, but in March 2017 a mother and kittens were documented on Babcock Ranch Preserve in Charlotte County — the first clear evidence of a female north of the Caloosahatchee River in over 40 years. Then Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Dr. Jennifer Korn, tracking a panther at Archbold Biological Station. Photo: Dustin Angell (FWC) biologists documented a second female north of the river, Highlands Mead Garden, looking for a waterthrush.
    [Show full text]
  • The Breeding Range of the Black-Necked Stilt
    248 The Wilson Bulletin-December, 1929 foot a constant reminder of the disagreeable experience. It is probable that hunger and the memory of source of sustenance are respectively stronger and more accurate in this muscular, bold creature than any recollection of pain or inconvenience which may have been caused at or near the source of food supply.- GEORGE MIKSCH SUTTON, Game Commission, Harrisburg, Pa. The Breeding Range of the Black-necked Stilt.-The breeding range of the Black-necked Stilt (Ilimantopus mexicanus) has been steadily increasing throughout different parts of southern and central Florida during the last few years. Where it was not found at all a few years ago it now breeds. In 1909 I found these birds nesting at Kissimmee and also at Lake Kissimmce on Rabbit Island. In 1915 they bred in numbers at Lake Harney, Seminole County. These places are still used as breeding places to the present date, May, 1929. They breed at Marco Island, some of the Keys. Puzzle Lake, Seminole County, Mer- ritts’ Island, along the St. Johns’ River between Sanford and Lake Harney, and at Geneva Ferry. The latest places discovered were at Turkey Hammock, Osceola County, which is where the Kissimee River begins at the south end of Lake Kissimee. About a dozen pairs were found evidently breeding, judging from their behavior, by Messrs. Arthur H. Howell and W. H. Ball, and me, on May 12, 1929. We also found four breeding pairs at Alligator RlufI, which is along the Kissimee River, on May 11, 7929. In March, 1908, March, 1910, and in 1912, I had covered this same territory and failed to see Rlack-necked Stilts in these two places.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Cyanotoxins in Florida's Lakes, Reservoirs And
    Assessment of Cyanotoxins in Florida’s Lakes, Reservoirs and Rivers by Christopher D. Williams BCI Engineers and Scientists, Inc. Lakeland, FL. John W. Burns Andrew D. Chapman Leeanne Flewelling St. Johns River Water Management District Palatka, FL. Marek Pawlowicz Florida Department of Health/Bureau of Laboratories Jacksonville, FL. Wayne Carmichael Wright State University Dayton, OH. 2001 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Harmful algal blooms (HABs) are population increases of algae above normal background levels and are defined by their negative impacts on the environment, the economy, and human health. Historically, many of Florida's largest and most utilized freshwater and estuarine systems have been plagued by occasional blooms of harmful algae. During the last decade, however, the frequency, duration, and concentration levels of these blooms in freshwater and brackish water have increased significantly, primarily due to changes in land utilization, changes in hydrology, increases in nutrient runoff, loss of aquatic vegetation, and a climate that is very conducive to algal growth and proliferation. In 1998, the Florida Harmful Algal Bloom Task Force was established to determine the extent to which HABs pose a problem for the state of Florida. Blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) were identified as top research priorities due to their potential to produce toxic chemicals and contaminate natural water systems. In June 1999, the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) initiated a collaborative study in conjunction with the Florida Marine Research Institute, the Florida Department of Health, and Wright State University to determine the geographical distribution of various types of toxin-producing blue-green algae in Florida's surface waters and to positively identify any algal toxins present in these waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Eating Fish Caught in Florida
    Fish Consumption Advisories are published periodically by the Your Guide State of Florida to alert consumers about the possibility of chemically contaminated fish in Florida waters. To Eating The advisories are meant to inform the public of potential health risks of specific fish species from specific Fish Caught water bodies. In Florida February 2019 Florida Department of Health Prepared in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 2019 Florida Fish Advisories • Table 1: Eating Guidelines for Fresh Water Fish from Florida Waters (based on mercury levels) page 1-50 • Table 2: Eating Guidelines for Marine and Estuarine Fish from Florida Waters (based on mercury levels) page 51-52 • Table 3: Eating Guidelines for species from Florida Waters with Heavy Metals (other than mercury), Dioxin, Pesticides, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), or Saxitoxin Contamination page 53-54 Eating Fish is an important part of a healthy diet. Rich in vitamins and low in fat, fish contains protein we need for strong bodies. It is also an excellent source of nutrition for proper growth and development. In fact, the American Heart Association recommends that you eat two meals of fish or seafood every week. At the same time, most Florida seafood has low to medium levels of mercury. Depending on the age of the fish, the type of fish, and the condition of the water the fish lives in, the levels of mercury found in fish are different. While mercury in rivers, creeks, ponds, and lakes can build up in some fish to levels that can be harmful, most fish caught in Florida can be eaten without harm.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Data, Inventory, and Analysis
    CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS CONSERVATION ELEMENT 5. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Data, Inventory, and Analysis INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Conservation Element is to promote the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources within the City of Altamonte Springs. The objective of the Conservation Element Data Inventory and Analysis (DIA) Report is to document the conditions for various natural resources found within the City and identify key community priorities for conservation strategies. The DIA Report also examines the current and projected water needs for the community over the 20-year planning horizon (2030) to ensure adequate water supply is available to support future demands. Together, this information serves as the foundation for goals, objectives, and policies prepared to guide future development within the City of Altamonte Springs. DATA AND ANALYSIS This section addresses the data inventory and analysis requirements of §9J-5.013(1), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), supportive to the goals, objectives, policies and implementation programs for the Conservation Element. Natural resources may include water, wetlands, floodplains, groundwater, air, minerals, soil, wildlife, and vegetative resources. Surface Water Quality Surface water resources within the City of Altamonte Springs generally consist of the Little Wekiva River and several lakes. Little Wekiva River The Little Wekiva River flows north from Lake Lawne in Orange County through Lake Lotus and Trout Lake in Altamonte Springs. It continues to flow in a northerly direction at the City limits into one of the southern arms of the Wekiva Swamp and eventually on into the Wekiva River. Extensive urban development along the Little Wekiva River has resulted in a host of problems including increased rate of flow and velocities, minimal upstream stormwater storage and treatment due to development occurring before current stormwater regulations, erosion and flooding, and degradation of the river’s water quality from the movement and deposition of sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    PUTNAM Legend (Ocean Shore Blvd) Halifax StHwy A1A 109th Congress of the United States River DISTRICT Lake Healy Cowpond Lake 24 Ormond-By-The-Sea Big Lake Louise DISTRICT 2 KANSAS OKLAHOMA Ormond ERIE 1 Beach Lake Disston Yonge St FLAGLER Turley C StHwy A1A (Atlantic Ave) e Holly n t e Hill r StHwy 11 40 ) S d y R t St H w d or StRd 19 Pierson (Dan F P o w Lake George e r L in Lake Shaw Lake e Pierson Justice Cain Lake S Tymber Creek Rd StHwy 430 (Mason Ave) Lpga Blvd Rd 40) Indigo Dr N (St Bill France Blvd Fort Belvoir 40 S Ridgewood Ave wy t StH H w y Ave B 5 95 A Midway Ave ( Payne Creek N Industrial Coral Sea Ave o Daytona Pkwy v Catalina Dr a Yosemite NP Lake Winona Terminal Dr R Beach d ) Midway Ave tHwy 40 Caraway Daytona Beach S Lake Williamson Blvd Shores Wildcat Lake Astor Big Tree Rd Interstate Hwy Other Major Road Lake Dias Slayton Ave Water Body 44 StHwy Lake Clifton 40 St Johns River Pine St South Other Road Schimmerhorne Lake StHwy 400 (Beville Rd) Daytona U.S. Hwy R Stream 56 Railroad i North Grasshopper Lake d g ) e e w v A o o South Grasshopper Lake n d o 92 t A 17 Rd Bay Clark w v Jolly Ford Rd la e un (D 1 Orange Rd 42 y De Leon Springs w H Chain O t 4 S Lake L i tt International Speedway Blvd Port Orange Lake Dexter le Farles Lake H T o a m Lake Daugharty w o C k r a Ponce F Lake Woodruff a r Buck Lake m Inlet s Stagger Mud Lake R d 0 2 4 6 Kilometers MARION Billies StHwy 421 (Taylor Rd) W Bay o o 0 2 4 6 Miles Tick Island d la Mud Lake nd A B l l ex v a d StHwy 19 nd e r Springs Coast Guard Station Cre Ponce de
    [Show full text]