DOCSLIB.ORG

Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long-Term Management Plan Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long-Term Management Plan Project 22001111 IInntteerraaggeennccyy DDrraafftt KKiissssiimmmmeeee CChhaaiinn ooff LLaakkeess LLoonngg--TTeerrmm MMaannaaggeemmeenntt PPllaann South Florida Water Management District Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Osceola County June 2011 Acknowledgments The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) would like to acknowledge the partner agencies and local governments and their staffs for their participation and commitment to the Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long-Term Management Plan project. This dedicated team of professionals has exercised due diligence in the compilation, preparation, and review of the materials presented within this document and has worked to define and embrace a common vision of health for the Kissimmee Chain of Lakes resource. The SFWMD also acknowledges all the other stakeholders who have provided valuable insights into and perspectives on the value of the resource and the need for federal, state, and local government agencies to work together to preserve and protect the natural resources of central Florida. For further information about this document, please contact: Chris Carlson South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Telephone: (561) 682-6143 Email: [email protected] Interagency Team Draft Revision 2011 CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... vii 1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 Participating Agency Guiding Policies ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN STRUCTURE ................................................................................... 1-3 Plan Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 1-3 Management Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 1-3 Hydrologic Management ......................................................................................................................................... 1-4 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 Fish and Wildlife ....................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 Aquatic Plant Management ..................................................................................................................................... 1-4 Water Supply ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 Recreation and Public Use ....................................................................................................................................... 1-4 Management Concerns, Targets, Priorities, and Challenges ...................................................................... 1-5 Monitoring and Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 1-5 Assessment Targets ..................................................................................................................................... 1-6 Plan Proposal (a.k.a Proposed Path Forward) ............................................................................................. 1-6 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................ 1-7 2 BASIN DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 2-1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 Hydrology .................................................................................................................................................... 2-2 Surfacewater Resources........................................................................................................................................... 2-3 C&SF Project Water Level Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 2-6 Groundwater Resources .......................................................................................................................................... 2-6 Water Quality .............................................................................................................................................. 2-7 Fish and Wildlife .......................................................................................................................................... 2-9 Aquatic and Wetland Vegetation .............................................................................................................. 2-10 Water Supply ............................................................................................................................................. 2-10 Public Use and Recreation ........................................................................................................................ 2-11 Land use ................................................................................................................................................................. 2-11 Parks, Marinas, and Boat Ramps ............................................................................................................................ 2-13 Conservation Lands ................................................................................................................................................ 2-13 Fish Management Areas ........................................................................................................................................ 2-14 Stakeholder Value Survey ...................................................................................................................................... 2-15 LAKE MANAGEMENT AREAS ..........................................................................................................2 -16 Lake Kissimmee, Lake Hatchineha, and Cypress Lake LMA (S-65 Structure) ............................................ 2-17 Lake Tohopekaliga LMA (S-61 Structure) .................................................................................................. 2-18 East Lake Tohopekaliga, Fells Cove and Ajay Lake LMA (S-59 Structure) ................................................. 2-18 Alligator Chain of Lakes LMA (S-58 and S-60 Structures) .......................................................................... 2-19 Lake Gentry LMA (S-63 and S-63A Structures) .......................................................................................... 2-20 Lakes Hart and Mary Jane LMA (S-62 Structure) ...................................................................................... 2-20 Lakes Joel, Myrtle, and Preston LMA (S-57 Structure) .............................................................................. 2-21 3 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES, CONCERNS, TARGETS, PRIORITIES, AND CHALLENGES ............. 3-1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 3-1 Hydrologic Management ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 Stabilized Water Levels ............................................................................................................................................ 3-2 Short Duration Low Water Levels ............................................................................................................................ 3-2 i | Table of Contents Interagency Team Draft Revision 2011 No Prescribed Extreme Low Water Events .............................................................................................................. 3-2 Prolonged Duration High Water Levels .................................................................................................................... 3-2 Poor Transitions between High and Low Water Levels ............................................................................................ 3-2 Volume and Rate of Watershed Runoff ................................................................................................................... 3-3 Water Quality .............................................................................................................................................. 3-4 Fish and Wildlife .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Publication SJ92-SP16 LAKE JESSUP RESTORATION
    Special Publication SJ92-SP16 LAKE JESSUP RESTORATION DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION HATER BUDGET AND NUTRIENT BUDGET Prepared for: ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, Florida Prepared By: Douglas H. Keesecker HATER AND AIR RESEARCH, INC. Gainesville, Florida May 1992 File: 91-5057 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page 1 of 2) Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE 1-1 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA 1-2 2.0 DATA COMPILATION 2-1 2.1 HISTORICAL DATA 2-1 2.1.1 Previous Studies 2-1 2.1.2 Climatoloqic Data 2-3 2.1.3 Hydrologic Data 2-4 2.1.4 Land Use and Cover Data 2-6 2.1.5 On-site Sewage Disposal System (OSDS) Data 2-8 2.1.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP1 Data 2-9 2.1.7 Surface Water Quality Data . 2-10 3.0 WATER BUDGET 3-1 3.1 METHODOLOGY 3-1 3.1.1 Springflow and Upward Leakage 3-2 3.1.2 Direct Precipitation 3-4 3.1.3 Land Surface Runoff 3-4 3.1.4 Shallow Groundwater Inflow 3-6 3.1.5 Septic Tank (OSDS1 Inflows 3-7 3.1.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent 3-8 3.1.7 Surface Evaporation 3-8 3.1.8 Surface Water Outflows 3-9 3.2 RESULTS - WATER BUDGET 3-10 3.3 DISCUSSION 3-16 3.4 ESTIMATE OF ERROR 3-18 3.4.1 Sprinoflow and Upward Leakage 3-18 3.4.2 Direct Precipitation 3-19 3.4.3 Land Surface Runoff 3-19 3.4.4 Shallow Groundwater Inflow 3-20 3.4.5 Septic Tank (OSDS1 Inflows 3-21 3.4.6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent 3-22 3.4.7 Surface Evaporation 3-22 3.4.8 Surface Water Outflows 3-22 LAKE JESSUP[WP]TOC 052192 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page 2 of 2) Section Page 4.0 NUTRIENT BUDGETS 4-1 4.1 METHODOLOGY 4-1 4.1.1 Direct Precipitation Loading 4-2 4.1.2 Land Surface Runoff Loading 4-3 4.1.3 Shallow Groundwater Inflow Loading 4-3 4.1.4 Septic Tank Loading 4-4 4.1.5 Wastewater Treatment Plant Loading 4-4 4.1.6 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1955
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 382 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1955 PART 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 382 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30,1955 PART 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS By P. R. Speer and A. B. Goodwin Washington, D. C., 1956 Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30,1955 PAET 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS By P. R Speer and A. B. Goodwin EXPLANATION This index lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the South Atlantic slope and Eastern Gulf of Mexico basins for which records have been or are to be published in reports of the Geological Survey for periods prior to September 30, 1955. Periods of record for the same station published by other agencies are listed only when they contain more detailed information or are for periods not reported in publications of the Geological Survey. The stations are listed in the downstream order first adopted for use in the 1951 series of water-supply papers on surface-water supply of the United States. Starting at the headwater of each stream all stations are listed in a downstream direction. Tributary streams are indicated by indention and are inserted between main-stem stations in the order in which they enter the main stream. To indicate the rank of any tributary on which a record is available and the stream to which it is immediately tributary, each indention in the listing of stations represents one rank.
    [Show full text]
  • Varve-Related Publications in Alphabetical Order (Version 15 March 2015) Please Report Additional References, Updates, Errors Etc
    Varve-Related Publications in Alphabetical Order (version 15 March 2015) Please report additional references, updates, errors etc. to Arndt Schimmelmann ([email protected]) Abril JM, Brunskill GJ (2014) Evidence that excess 210Pb flux varies with sediment accumulation rate and implications for dating recent sediments. Journal of Paleolimnology 52, 121-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10933-014-9782-6; statistical analysis of radiometric dating of 10 annually laminated sediment cores from aquatic systems, constant rate of supply (CRS) model. Abu-Jaber NS, Al-Bataina BA, Jawad Ali A (1997) Radiochemistry of sediments from the southern Dead Sea, Jordan. Environmental Geology 32 (4), 281-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002540050218; Dimona, Jordan, gamma spectroscopy, lead-210, no anthropogenic contamination, calculated sedimentation rate agrees with varve record. Addison JA, Finney BP, Jaeger JM, Stoner JS, Norris RN, Hangsterfer A (2012) Examining Gulf of Alaska marine paleoclimate at seasonal to decadal timescales. In: (Besonen MR, ed.) Second Workshop of the PAGES Varves Working Group, Program and Abstracts, 17-19 March 2011, Corpus Christi, Texas, USA, 15-21. http://www.pages.unibe.ch/download/docs/working_groups/vwg/2011_2nd_VWG_workshop_programs_and_abstracts.pdf; ca. 60 cm marine sediment core from Deep Inlet in southeast Alaska, CT scan, XRF scanning, suspected varves, 1972 earthquake and tsunami caused turbidite with scouring and erosion. Addison JA, Finney BP, Jaeger JM, Stoner JS, Norris RD, Hangsterfer A (2013) Integrating satellite observations and modern climate measurements with the recent sedimentary record: An example from Southeast Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118 (7), 3444-3461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20243; Gulf of Alaska, paleoproductivity, scanning XRF, Pacific Decadal Oscillation PDO, fjord, 137Cs, 210Pb, geochronometry, three-dimensional computed tomography, discontinuous event-based marine varve chronology spans AD ∼1940–1981, Br/Cl ratios reflect changes in marine organic matter accumulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for Rezoning on Lakes
    STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION & FORESTRY LAND USE PLANNING COMMISSION 22 STATE HOUSE STATION WALTER E. WHITCOMB PAUL R. LEPAGE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0022 COMMISSIONER GOVERNOR NICHOLAS D. LIVESAY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Memorandum To: LUPC Commissioners From: Samantha Horn, Planning Manager Ben Godsoe, Senior Planner Date: October 5, 2018 Re: Considerations for Rezoning Near Lakes, Staff Analysis Lake resources are important to Maine’s character, environment and economy. Healthy lakes are a strong draw for local residents and visitors alike, and play a critical role in sustaining fish and wildlife populations. When the Commission considers the location of future subdivisions, it is important to be deliberate about which lakes may be near new zones for subdivisions. The May 2018 draft of rule revisions for adjacency included a proposal that any new zones for waterfront subdivision should be either 1) on a lake or pond that is within a certain distance of services (i.e., within primary or secondary locations); or 2) on a lake or pond that is already developed. Outside of primary or secondary locations, lakes under the proposed revisions that could be eligible for rezoning include management class 3, 4, and 5 lakes, as well as certain class 7 lakes. During the public hearing on the draft rule revisions, commenters raised concerns that there was not sufficient information available to tell which or how many class 7 lakes qualify as having sufficient development to make them potentially be eligible for rezoning. Without this information, commenters raised concerns that a large number of lakes could possibly be “open for development.” Commenters requested more information on which class 7 lakes could be affected by the proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Perspective on the Kissimmee River Restoration Project
    ing of 14 km of river channel, and removal of two water­ An Historical control structures and associated levees. Restoration of the Kissimmee River ecosystem will result in the reestablish­ ment of 104 km2 of river-floodplain ecosystem, including Perspective on the 70 km of river channel and 11,000 ha of wetland habitat, which is expected to benefit over 320 species of fish and Kissimmee River wildlife. Restoration Project Background he Kissimmee River basin is located in central Florida Tbetween the city of Orlando and lake Okeechobee Joseph W. Koebel, Jr.1 within the Coastal Lowlands physiographic province. It con­ sists of a 4229-km2 upper basin, which includes Lake Kis­ Abstract simmee and 18 smaller lakes ranging in size from a few hec­ tares to 144 km2, and a 1,963-km2 lower basin, which This paper reviews the events leading to the channeliza­ includes the tributary watersheds (excluding Lake Istok­ tion of the Kissimmee River, the physical, hydrologic, and poga) of the Kissimmee River between lake Kissimmee and biological effects of channelization, and the restoration lake Okeechobee. The physiography of the region includes movement. Between 1962 and 1971, in order to provide the Osceola and Okeechobee Plains and the Lake Wales flood control for central and southern florida, the 166 ridge of the Wicomico shore (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers km-Iong meandering Kissimmee River was transformed 1992). into a 90 km-Iong, 10 meter-deep, 100 meter-wide canal. Prior to channelization, the Kissimmee River meandered Channelization and transformation of the Kissimmee River approximately 166 km within a 1.5-3-km-wide floodplain.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Threatened Fishes in Warner Basin, Oregon
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 50 Number 3 Article 5 10-31-1990 Conservation status of threatened fishes in arnerW Basin, Oregon Jack E. Williams Division of Wildlife and Fisheries, Bureau of Land Management, Washington, D.C. Mark A. Stern The Nature Conservancy, Portland, Oregon Alan V. Munhall Bureau of Land Management, Lakeview, Oregon Gary A. Anderson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Lakeview, Oregon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Williams, Jack E.; Stern, Mark A.; Munhall, Alan V.; and Anderson, Gary A. (1990) "Conservation status of threatened fishes in arnerW Basin, Oregon," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 50 : No. 3 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol50/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Creat &Isio N:l.luraUst 50(3), 1900, pp. 243-248 CONSERVATION STATUS OF THREATENED FISHES IN WARNER BASIN, OREGON 1 l 3 Jack E. Williams , MarkA. Stern \ Alan V. Munhall , and Cary A. Anderson"" A8S'TRACT.-Two fedemlJy listed fisbes, the Foskett speckled daceand Warnersucker, are endemic to Warner Basin in south central Oregon. The Foskett speckled dace is native only to a single spring in Coleman Valley. Anearby'spring was stocked with dace in 1979 and 1980, and now provides a second population. The present numbers ofdace probably are at their Wgbest levels since settlement ofthe region.
    [Show full text]
  • Orlando Urban Exploration Guide
    URBAN EXPLORATION WHERE TO EXPLORE IN AND AROUND THE ORLANDO AREA – INCLUDES HIKING, BIKING, AND PADDLING Recreation Opportunities in Orlando Let’s review the best places to get outside in downtown and suburban Orlando Downtown Adventures TAKE A BUS, A BIKE, OR WALK Gaston Edwards Park Located in Ivanhoe Park Village, Gaston Edwards runs along the shore of Lake Ivanhoe. It offers fitness stations, a sand volleyball court, plenty of shade trees, and a couple docks. You can even launch a paddleboard from the paddleboard-specific dock. The Orlando Urban Trail can also be accessed from the park. Address 1236 N Orange Ave, Orlando, FL 32804 Distance from Downtown 1.5 miles via bike lanes Open Sunrise to Sunset Mead Botanical Gardens Perfect for the plant lover, Mead Gardens has paths all through the garden. Relax at the tranquil ponds or learn about different plant species sprinkled around the park Address 1300 S Denning Dr, Winter Park, FL 32789 Distance from Downtown 4.2 miles via the Orlando Urban Trail Open 8:00AM-7:00PM Greenwood Urban Wetland Greenwood Urban Wetland is one of the best places in downtown Orlando for birdwatching despite its proximity to the highway. The wetland is the perfect home for many native Florida birds. Address 1411 Greenwood St, Orlando, FL 32801 Distance from Downtown 2.4 miles via bike lanes Open Sunrise to Sunset Dickson Azalea Park Dickson Azalea Park offers an oasis for those who want to enjoy its shady trees, picturesque landscape, beautiful birds and flowing water. Frequently a location for those who want a quiet lunch, or a relaxing view, this park is truly one of Orlando’s gems.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area
    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) September 5, 2019 St. Cloud, Florida 1 Agenda 1. Introductions and Background……... Don Medellin, SFWMD 2. SJRWMD MFLs Priority List……Andrew Sutherland, SJRWMD 3. SWFWMD MFLs Priority List..Doug Leeper, SWFWMD 4. SFWMD MFLs Priority List……Don Medellin, SFWMD 5. Stakeholder comments 6. Adjourn 2 Statutory Directive for MFLs Water management districts or DEP must establish MFLs that set the limit or level… “…at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.” Section 373.042(1), Florida Statutes 3 Statutory Directive for Reservations Water management districts may… “…reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety.” Section 373.223(4), Florida Statutes 4 District Priority Lists and Schedules Meet Statutory and Rule Requirements ▪ Prioritization is based on the importance of waters to the State or region, and the existence of or potential for significant harm ▪ Includes waters experiencing or reasonably expected to experience adverse impacts ▪ MFLs the districts will voluntarily subject to independent scientific peer review are identified ▪ Proposed reservations are identified ▪ Listed water bodies that have the potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent water management district are identified 5 2019 Draft Priority List and Schedule ▪ Annual priority list and schedule required by statute for each district ▪ Presented to respective District Governing Boards for approval ▪ Submitted to DEP for review by Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Dam, Oklawaha River, Moss Bluff, Fla
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 207.170 (8) The building, assembling, or ans, Louisiana, if between Suwanee breaking up of a raft in a waterway River and St. Marks, Florida. will be permitted only upon special au- (j) Trespass on property of the United thority obtained from the District En- States. Trespass on waterway property gineer, and under such conditions as he or injury to the banks, locks, bridges, may prescribe. piers, fences, trees, houses, shops or (h) Dumping of refuse or oil in water- any other property of the United way, obstructions. Attention is invited States pertaining to the waterway is to the provisions of sections 13 and 20 strictly prohibited. No business, trad- of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, ing or landing of freight or baggage 1899 (30 Stat. 1152, 1154; 33 U. S. C. 407, will be allowed on or over Government 415), and of sections 2, 3, and 4 of the piers, bridges, or lock walls. Oil Pollution Act of June 7, 1924 (43 (k) Copies of regulations. Copies of the Stat. 604, 605; 33 U.S.C. 432–434), which regulations in this section will be fur- prohibit the depositing of any refuse nished free of charge upon application matter in these waterways or along to the nearest District Engineer. their banks where liable to be washed [Regs., Apr. 30, 1938, as amended at 8 FR into the waters; authorize the imme- 15381, Nov. 9, 1943; 25 FR 8908, Sept. 16, 1960; diate removal or destruction of any 26 FR 353, Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Records.Indd
    STATE-RECORD FRESHWATER FISH (Information Courtesy of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) Largemouth Bass 17.27 lbs. Billy M. O’Berry July 6,1986 Unnamed lake, Polk County Redeye Bass 7.83 lbs. William T. Johnson Feb. 18, 1989 Apalachicola River, Gadsden Co. Spotted Bass 3.75 lbs. Dow Gilmore June 24, 1985 Apalachicola River, Gulf Co. Suwannee Bass 3.89 lbs. Ronnie Everett March 2,1985 Suwannee River, Gilchrist Co. Striped Bass 42.25 lbs. Alphonso Barnes Dec. 14,1993 Apalachicola River, Gadsden Co. Peacock Bass 9.08 lbs. Jerry Gomez Mar. 11,1993 Kendall Lakes, Dade County Oscar 2.34 lbs. Jimmy Cook Mar. 16,1994 Lake Okeechobee, Palm Beach Skipjack Herring Open (Qualifying weight is 2.5 lbs.) White Bass 4.69 lbs. Richard S. Davis April 9,1982 Apalachicola River, Gadsden Co. Sunshine Bass 16.31 lbs. Thomas R. Elder May 9,1985 Lake Seminole, Jackson County Black Crappie 3.83 lbs. Ben F. Curry, Sr. Jan. 21, 1992 Lake Talquin, Gadsden County Flier 1.24 lbs. William C. Lane, Jr. Aug. 14, 1992 Lake Iamonia, Leon County Bluegill 2.95 lbs. John R. LeMaster Apr. 19,1989 Crystal Lake Washington County Redbreast Sunfish 2.08 lbs. Jerrell DeWees, Jr. April 29, 1988 Suwannee River, Gilchrist County Redear Sunfish 4.86 lbs. Joseph M. Floyd Mar. 13, 1986 Merritts Mill Pond, Jackson Co. Spotted Sunfish .83 lbs. Coy Dotson May 12,1984 Suwannee River, Columbia Co. Warmouth 2.44 lbs. Tony Dempsey Oct. 19, 1985 Yellow Riv. (Guess Lk.) Okaloosa Chain Pickerel 6.96 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Sewage Effluent Removal on the Water Quality of Lake Howell, Florida
    University of Central Florida STARS Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 1986 The Effect of Sewage Effluent Removal on the Water Quality of Lake Howell, Florida Patricia L. Smith University of Central Florida Part of the Biology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/rtd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Smith, Patricia L., "The Effect of Sewage Effluent Removal on the Water Quality of Lake Howell, Florida" (1986). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4943. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/rtd/4943 THE EFFECT OF SEWAGE EFFLUENT REMOVAL ON THE WATER QUALITY OF LAKE HOWELL, FLORIDA BY PATRICIA LYNN SMITH B.A., Florida Technological University, 1973 B.S., University of Central Florida, 1982 THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology in the Graduate Studies Program of the College of Arts and Sciences University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 1986 ABSTRACT In April, 1983, sewage effluent discharge from the Maitland and Winter Park sewage treatment plants was diverted from Lake Howell to the Iron Bridge Regional Sewage Treatment Plant. The sewage treatment plants of the cities of Winter Park and Maitland had been discharging into Lake Howell since 1927 and 1962, respectively . These point sources had contributed 95% of the total phosphorous and 69% of the total nitrogen budgets for Lake Howell.
    [Show full text]
  • Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Highlights
    KISSIMMEE CHAIN OF LAKES HIGHLIGHTS FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION 1601 Scottys Road, Kissimmee FL 34744 Aquatic Habitat Conservation & Restoration Section (407) 846-5300 www.MyFWC.com August 13, 2004 2004 Lake Tohopekaliga Extreme Drawdown & Habitat Enhancement Project Has Concluded Prior to flood control in the mid 1960’s, aquatic vegetation and organic material did not accumulate along the shoreline due to a natural cleansing process that occurred during flood and drought events. For the past 17 years, stabilized water levels on Lake Tohopekaliga have resulted in a build-up of aquatic vegetation along the shorelines. Over time, the aquatic vegetation died and decomposed which contributed to the build-up of muck along the shorelines. Once the muck accumulates, more aquatic and terrestrial vegetation becomes rooted on top of the muck. This process leads to less available open water in the lake and sometimes results in the formation of floating islands known as tussocks. These tussocks can cause serious problems as navigational hazards for boaters, diminish desirable fish and wildlife habitat and threaten water control structures. To set-back lake succession, the extreme drawdown and muck removal project was planned. In November 2003, with all permits and plans in place, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) began to lower Lake Tohopekaliga’s water level from 55 ft National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) down to 49 ft NGVD. With the water level down, prescribed burning was initiated in densely vegetated areas of the lake. Meanwhile, heavy equipment including bulldozers, front-end loaders, track-hoes and dump trucks carried the undesirable vegetation and muck out of the lake or to designated in-lake disposal islands.
    [Show full text]