ZOA Ethiopia Market Assessment for NFI Distribution Filtu, Liben Zone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ZOA Ethiopia Market Assessment for NFI Distribution Filtu, Liben Zone ZOA Ethiopia Market Assessment for NFI Distribution Filtu, Liben Zone September 2018 1. Introduction ZOA is proposing an Emergency Shelter and NFI intervention to respond to newly displaced populations in the Somali – Oromo conflict, through the Rapid Response Fund of IOM. In the preparation of this intervention, this market assessment was done to assess whether the local market conditions are favorable towards cash / voucher modalities for distribution of NFI kits. The proposed intervention is located in Liben Zone of Somali Region, in particular Filtu and Deka Suftu Woreda. Since the NFI distribution is concentrating on newly displaced persons in Filtu, this market assessment is focusing on the market in Filtu only. The targeted IDPs are located within walking distance to Filtu Town, so the market of Filtu Town is subject of this assessment. The market assessment was carried out by ZOA on 15th of September 2018, with 5 sampled vendors in Filtu Town. 1.1. Purpose of the Assessment • The main purpose of the market assessment is to assess whether the voucher system is a suitable and appropriate modality for NFI distribution given the local market situation. • To find out whether all required NFI items are available at the local market in Filtu Town. • To find out the number of vendors of selected NFIs, how the market is functioning, and where the vendors get their products from. • To get a better understanding of market dynamics, including the risks, challenges and difficulties vendors face in order to operate in Filtu. • To provide key information on local market prices in the area of essential non-food items. • To make appropriate recommendations for actions to be taken. 2. Methodology Vendors were randomly sampled from the market in Filtu Town using a common randomized walk methodology. The tool that was used for this market assessment is the ‘Rapid Market Assessment – Vendor Questionnaire’ from IOM. See Annex 1 at the end of this document. The tool was made available by IOM contacts in Addis Ababa through e-mail. The tool was slightly altered and contextualized. For instance, since no costs for mosquito nets are eligible under this program, they were removed from the list in the questionnaire. Plastic sheets and ropes were removed as well, since they will part of the Emergency Shelter kit, which is to be provided to ZOA by IOM. Mattresses were added, as this was seen as a highly useful and appropriate item for the targeted beneficiaries. For data collection, two ZOA staff, the project coordinator and the operations officer, went to the market in Filtu Town to conduct the vendor questionnaires. The vendors were randomly selected and interviewed in their shops. Their consent to collaborate was asked and their privacy in regard to specific personal information was respected. All vendors were operating under the same market conditions and were interviewed on the same day. The objective of the assessment, being purely to assess the current market conditions, was clearly explained to each vendor individually. The assessment used a combination of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The first part of the assessment mainly was about qualitative information in regards to the shop, availability of items, market developments, challenges and difficulties, and capacity of the vendor. The last part of the questionnaire was the local market prices, indicating the specific price per type of item. 3. Summary of key findings 3.1 Vendor Questionnaire One of the main findings of the assessment is that all the required non-food items are available at the market. In fact, all five vendors ensured that they were able to supply all required items if needed. Filtu Market The interviewed vendors were all involved in wholesale type of business. They also all reported that they consider the market in Filtu to be ‘’very well connected’’ with other markets and all of them said they bring goods and commodities from outside Ethiopia. The vendors purchase their goods and commodities from a variety of other markets, including Addis Ababa, Nairobi, Dollo Ado (and Mogadishu, Somalia), Mandera (Kenya), and even Dubai. In general, they re-stock their shop once every two weeks, some even once every week. Shocks All vendors reported that conflict was one of the main factors that made it difficult to continue to do business during shocks. Secondly, the rainy season was mentioned, which could cut off important access roads. Other factors that were hampering successful business were road safety (car accidents), inflation and exchange rate variations. Capacity In response to the question how long it would take the vendors to provide additional stocks to meet the increased demand, one vendor answered that this would possible at any day and any time. Another responded that he would need five days to one week. The other three could not give a clear timeframe, since it depends on the exact size of the order, type of item, situation on the road, and availability at the market. Other factors that could make supply of large quantities more difficult, which were mentioned, were lack of cash and unclear contractual agreement with company or client. Access to credit All five vendors reported to have access to credit, including from government institution, Somali Micro Finance and the Commercial Bank of Ethiopia. Next to that, also all five vendors confirmed they hold a government business registration certificate. Price fluctuations The vendors reported that there is no specific time of the year when they increase commodity prices. The increment of prices is possible, but this usually depends on exchange rate, inflation and other shocks like conflict, road condition as mentioned above. Vendors do not expect any shortages or large price deviations in case a large number of NFI materials is purchased for the program by ZOA. Experience in humanitarian response All vendors confirmed they have participated in humanitarian response in the past, although most of them as suppliers of materials to NGOs, rather than supplying NFI items directly to affected displaced populations, through a voucher system. However, one of the suppliers has experience in working with IOM, while others worked with CCM, Handicap International, Save the Children and Pastoralist Concern. Risks of NFI distribution through voucher systems According to the vendors, the risk of distributing NFIs to IDPs is that it may not be enough to cover all the needs, and persons that have need receive create tensions in the community and towards to vendors. Clear selection criteria based on vulnerability is key, next to close collaboration with local government to ensure security. 3.2 Local Market Prices of NFIs As part of the questionnaire, the local market prices of key non-food items were collected from the different vendors. In the table below, an overview is provided. For future monitoring purposes, including PDM, this can be considered as baseline market price survey. This overview shows that all items are available at all vendors. Differences in pricing are, however, considerable, so negotiations on price and other factors needs to be done thoroughly before vendors are contracted. Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Vendor 4 Vendor 5 Aluminium basin 400 300 260 300 380 Aluminium kettle 250 180 228 200 220 Aluminium cup 30 30 36 20 50 Aluminium cooking pot 400 250 410 150 270 Aluminium ladle 100 100 150 50 50 Aluminium plate 100 150 200 100 120 Jerrican (10 litre) 100 85 70 80 70 Jerrican (20 litre) 150 120 140 110 95 Sleeping mat 400 450 330 350 390 Mattress 1000 950 750 900 Blanket 800 300 300 300 450 Hassian bag 150 200 200 120 150 Laundry soap 13 12 11.50 10 9.50 Prices in Ethiopian Birr, excluding 15% VAT, collected on 15th of September 2018 Vendor 1 – Janay Wholesale Vendor 2 – Gandeyer Filtu/muse Vendor 3 – Hassan Abikar Wholesale Vendor 4 – Nishad Abdiwahli Purchasing Company Vendor 5 – Ahmad Mahamad Dahir Wholesale 4. Recommendations for implementation • It is concluded that the local market in Filtu for key non-food items (NFIs) is well functional. • All the key NFIs are available and there are sufficient vendors, with enough supply, including the capacity to scale up and respond to increased demand. • Therefore, the market seems favorable for distribution of NFIs through the modality of vouchers. • Different types of shocks, primarily conflict, rainy season and inaccessible roads and price fluctuations due to inflation or exchange, do affect the local market of Filtu, but are not considered as factors that could have a major negative impact on the functionality of the market. • Moreover, in spite of these shocks, the market still seems to be well connected to other markets, including markets in neighboring countries like Somalia and Kenya • Vendors happen to have experience in humanitarian response, including working with IOM. • The intervention of the procurement and distribution of 420 NFI kits in Filtu is therefore well recommended and justified. Annex 1: Rapid Market Assessment– Vendor Questionnaire Region: ____________________ Zone: _______________Woreda:__________Kebele_______________ Site: ____________ Data Collector’s Name: ________________ Date of data collection: _____________ i. Demographic data A. Indicate the total number of interviewees’ ____________ Sex: # Female ______ # Male_______ ii. Interview Questions 1. What is the name of this marketplace? ________________________________ 2. What type of business are you involved in? Whole sale Retail 3. Approximately how many vendors own businesses in this market? ______________ 4. How well is this market connected to other markets? Very well connected Fairly well connected not connected 5. Which three main markets do you purchase the goods/commodities that you sell in this market? (name markets) 1 2 3 6. Do you bring any goods/commodities from outside Ethiopia? Yes No If yes, specify countrie/s _______________________________________________ 7.
Recommended publications
  • 1 DRC Protection Assessment Report in IDP Sites in Afder Zone October
    DRC Protection assessment Report in IDP sites in Afder Zone October 2018 1 Contents 1. Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 2. Scope of the assessment -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 3. Objective of the assessment ---------------------------------------------------------------------4 3.1 General Objectives--------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 3.2 Specific Objectives------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------4 4. Composition of the Assessment team---------------------------------------------------------- -4 5. Ethical considerations -----------------------------------------------------------------------------5 6. Methodology and assessment tools---------------------------------------------------------------5 7. Major challenges during assessment-------------------------------------------------------------6 8. Key Findings----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 8.1 Bare 01 IDP site ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 8.2 Den Adine IDP site ----------------------------------------------------------------------------10 8.3 Weydkal IDP site ------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 8.4 Allana IDP site ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 8.5 Darso IDP site-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------14
    [Show full text]
  • Hum Ethio Manitar Opia Rian Re Espons E Fund D
    Hum anitarian Response Fund Ethiopia OCHA, 2011 OCHA, 2011 Annual Report 2011 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011 Table of Contents Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator ................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 2011 Humanitarian Context ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Map - 2011 HRF Supported Projects ............................................................................................. 6 2. Information on Contributors ................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Donor Contributions to HRF .......................................................................................................... 7 3. Fund Overview .................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2011 ............................................................................................ 8 3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Africa: Security and the Legacy of Fragility
    Eastern Africa: Security and the Legacy of Fragility Africa Program Working Paper Series Gilbert M. Khadiagala OCTOBER 2008 INTERNATIONAL PEACE INSTITUTE Cover Photo: Elderly women receive ABOUT THE AUTHOR emergency food aid, Agok, Sudan, May 21, 2008. ©UN Photo/Tim GILBERT KHADIAGALA is Jan Smuts Professor of McKulka. International Relations and Head of Department, The views expressed in this paper University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South represent those of the author and Africa. He is the co-author with Ruth Iyob of Sudan: The not necessarily those of IPI. IPI Elusive Quest for Peace (Lynne Rienner 2006) and the welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit editor of Security Dynamics in Africa’s Great Lakes of a well-informed debate on critical Region (Lynne Rienner 2006). policies and issues in international affairs. Africa Program Staff ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS John L. Hirsch, Senior Adviser IPI owes a great debt of thanks to the generous contrib- Mashood Issaka, Senior Program Officer utors to the Africa Program. Their support reflects a widespread demand for innovative thinking on practical IPI Publications Adam Lupel, Editor solutions to continental challenges. In particular, IPI and Ellie B. Hearne, Publications Officer the Africa Program are grateful to the government of the Netherlands. In addition we would like to thank the Kofi © by International Peace Institute, 2008 Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre, which All Rights Reserved co-hosted an authors' workshop for this working paper series in Accra, Ghana on April 11-12, 2008. www.ipinst.org CONTENTS Foreword, Terje Rød-Larsen . i Introduction. 1 Key Challenges .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Drought Emergency Response Areas: Afar and Liben October to November 2014
    Pastoralist Areas Resilience Improvement Market Expansion (PRIME) Final Report Drought Emergency Response Areas: Afar and Liben October to November 2014 Report Submitted by: Mercy Corps Report submitted to: USAID/OFDA March 2015 Overview Organization Name Mercy Corps USAID Development Program Title Pastoralists Areas Resilience Improvement through Market Expansion (PRIME) Fodder voucher interventions in drought affected woredas of Program Title Liben zone in Somali and Gebi Resu (zone 3) in Afar regional states Sector Name Agriculture and Food Security To respond to deteriorated pasture conditions resulting from seasonal rainfall failure in target pastoralist areas, and prevent further decrease in productivity of livestock and losses of Objective productive assets of pastoral households in target affected areas. To protect development gains of PRIME in the above areas. Indicator 1: Number of animals benefiting from or affected by livestock activities 20,588 livestock assisted Indicator 2: Total number of critical market actors (e.g., producers, suppliers, traders, processers) directly assisted Indicators 309 small-scale fodder/feed suppliers, 2 wholesalers (commercial fodder supplier) and 4 local retailers participated Indicator 3. Number of people benefiting from livestock activities 9543 HHs (66,801 persons) benefited 1 Dollar Amount Financed USD 1,000,000 Target: 6,500 HHs (3,250 HHs in zone 3 of Afar and 3,250 HHs in Liben zone); 10,000 Livestock (5,000 in Afar and Number of People and Livestock Targeted 5,000 in Liben) Achieved:
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL EVALUATION of “Emergency Program to Assist the Vulnerable
    FINAL EVALUATION of “Emergency program to assist the vulnerable people in LIBAN Woreda, Borena Zone of Oromia Regional State FILTU Woreda, Liben Zone of Somali Regional State” Funded by USAID OFDA June 2002 By: Carlo Maconi Index of contents 1 SUMMARY 1 2 BACK GROUND 3 2.1 GOVERNMENT/POLICY SUPPORT 3 2.2 FEATURES OF THE SUB SECTOR 3 2.3 BENEFICIARIES & PARTIES INVOLVED 3 2.4 PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED 5 2.5 OTHER INTERVENTIONS 6 2.6 DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE 7 3 INTERVENTION ACHIEVED 8 3.1 OVERALL OBJECTIVE 8 3.2 PROJECT PURPOSE 8 3.3 RESULTS 8 3.4 EFFECTIVENESS 13 3.5 OVERALL OUTCOME AND IMPACT 13 3.6 ACTIVITIES 15 4 ASSUMPTION 16 5 IMPLEMENTATION 17 5.1 ORGANIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES 17 5.2 TIMETABLE 17 5.3 COSTS AND FINANCING PLAN 18 5.4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS/ACCOMPANYING MEASURES TAKEN BY GOVERNMENT 18 6 SUSTAINABILITY 19 6.1 POLICY SUPPORT 19 6.2 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY 19 6.3 SOCIO CULTURAL ASPECTS 19 6.4 INSTITUTIONAL AND MANAGEMENT CAPACITY 20 7 MONITORING & EVALUATION 22 7.1 DEFINITION OF INDICATORS 22 7.2 REVIEWS/EVALUATION 22 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMANDATIONS 22 Final Evaluation Project title: “Emergency program to assist vulnerable people in Liben and Filtu Woreda” 1 SUMMARY COOPI is an International Non Governmental Organization based in Italy-Milan. In Ethiopia COOPI is working since 1995 and it’s headquarter is located in Addis Ababa. Among the different projects that COOPI has been implementing in draught affected areas of the country like Somali Region and low land part of Oromiya Region, the project entitled by “Emergency program to assist vulnerable people in Liben Zone-Somali National Regional state and Borena Zone-Oromia regional state” was funded by USAID/OFDA is one.
    [Show full text]
  • MIND the GAP Commercialization, Livelihoods and Wealth Disparity in Pastoralist Areas of Ethiopia
    MIND THE GAP Commercialization, Livelihoods and Wealth Disparity in Pastoralist Areas of Ethiopia Yacob Aklilu and Andy Catley December 2010 Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Structure of the report .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Livestock exports from pastoral areas of Ethiopia: recent trends and issues ......................................... 6 2.1 The growing trade: economic gains outweigh ethnicity and trust........................................................ 7 2.2 The cross‐border trade from Somali Region and Borana ...................................................................... 8 2.3 Trends in formal exports from Ethiopia .............................................................................................. 12 2.4 A boom in prices and the growth of bush markets ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AFET-22 Appeal Target: US$ 27,030,875 Balance Requested from ACT Network: US$ 26,995,619
    150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Appeal Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 e-mail: [email protected] Ethiopia Coordinating Office Assistance to Drought Affected - AFET-22 Appeal Target: US$ 27,030,875 Balance Requested from ACT Network: US$ 26,995,619 Geneva, 21 November 2002 Dear Colleagues, According to the report released in September 2002 by the Ethiopia Federal Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Commission (DPPC), over 6.8 million people in Ethiopia are facing severe food shortages during the current period, with the numbers expected to rise to about 10 million people in the early part of 2003. The Ethiopian Prime Minister, Meles Zenawi was quoted earlier this month as saying that the country faces a famine worse than that of 1984 which killed nearly one million people and sparked off huge international relief efforts. He was further quoted “if the 1984 famine was a nightmare, then this will be too ghastly to contemplate”. Whether this statement could be considered accurate or not, the truth of the matter is that Ethiopia is once more faced with a very severe food crisis which calls for the international community to intervene with massive food aid. As a country highly dependent on rain fed agriculture, this years’ partial or total failure of the belg (short rains) in many areas aggravated the problem of food insecurity. The meher rains (longer rains) also came late and were erratic affecting the long cycle crops and the availability of pasture and water supplies in many pastoral areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping of Key Natural Resources in the Cross-Border Areas of Kenya, Somalia & Ethiopia
    Mapping of Key Natural Resources in the Cross-Border Areas of Kenya, Somalia & Ethiopia Building Opportunities for Resilience in the Horn of Africa Prepared by BORESHA Consortium Partners: Mapping of Key Natural Resources in the Cross-Border Areas of Kenya, Somalia & Ethiopia Building Opportunities for Resilience in the Horn of Africa Final Report Submitted to CARE Somalia 21st November 2018 2 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................10 Section 1 Context .......................................................................................................................................17 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................17 About BORESHA .................................................................................................................................17 Background to Assignment ................................................................................................................17 Structure of this report ........................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipated Humanitarian Requirement for Water, Sanitation
    1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS/GLOSSARY ......................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 3 1.1. 2014 ANNUAL HUMANITARIAN REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT ........................................................................... 3 1.2. HUMANITARIAN SITUATION OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 3 2. REVIEW OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 2013 HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE ................................................................................................................... 6 2.1RELIEF FOOD AND TSF .............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 HEALTH AND NUTRITION ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE (WASH) .................................................................................................... 12 2.4 AGRICULTURE ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.5 EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beekeepingpractices in Four Districts of Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia
    Nigerian J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 20 (1): 1-10 Beekeeping practices in four districts of tigray region, northern Ethiopia Gebregiorgis A. G., Berihu G., Tsegay T. G., Niraj K.* and Abrha B. H. College of Veterinary Medicine, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Target audience: Ministry of Agriculture, Researchers, Apiculture Professionals Abstract A survey was carried out on beekeeping practices in four districts (Degua-Timben, Hawzen, Saesiea- Tsaeda-Emba and Atsib-Wemberta) of Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia. Data were obtained from 164 beekeepers by using pre-tested, structured questionnaire on demographic characteristics and honey production practices. Beekeeping was dominated by male (91.46%). Higher proportion (56.71%) of the respondents used traditional hive, while 22.56% worked with modern hive only and 20.73% were practicing both. The overall average number of traditional and modern hives per respondent in the study area was 7.45 and 3.20, respectively. Majority (76.22%) of the respondents practiced supplementary feeding of bee colonies, with 72.56% who fed bees in March to May. Annual honey production per traditional hive was significantly (p<0.05) higher in Saesiea-Tsaeda-Emba (11.42±1.77 kg), Atsib- Wemberta (10.55±0.84 kg) and Hawzen (10.15±1.36 kg) than what was realized in Degua-Timben (7.88±1.40 kg), while honey production per modern hive was significantly (p<0.05) higher in Atsib- Wemberta (35.33±2.20 kg) and Hawzen (33.05±1.94 kg) districts than what was realized in Saesiea- Tsaeda-Emba (23.22±1.81 kg).
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Pilot Livelihoods Profiles
    Cross-border Pilot Livelihoods Profiles Report prepared by: Alexandra Crosskey & Abdi-Fatah Ahmed Ismail August 2009 The Pastoral Areas Coordination, Analysis and Policy Support (PACAPS) project is implemented by the Feinstein International Center of Tufts University, under USAID grant number 623‐A‐00‐07‐ 00018‐00. The early warning and early response components of the project are supported by FEG Consulting. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development, the United States Government or Tufts University. Contents Foreword …………………………………..…………………………….……………………………………………………. 4 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………..……………………………………….……….. 4 Section 1: How to Use the Cross‐border Profiles ………………………..………….…………..………… 6 1. Understanding Cross‐border Livelihoods ………………………..………………………………. 6 2. Early Warning ……………………………………….………………………………………..……………….. 6 a. Projected Outcome Analysis for Early Warning ………………………………………..…… 7 b. Early Warning Monitoring ……………………………………..……………………………….… 10 3. Program Development ………………………….……………………….……………………………. 12 a. Intervention Design ………………………………….…………………….……………………….. 12 b. Intervention Timing ………………………………….………………………..……………………. 13 c. Monitoring the Impact of a Project ………………………..…………………….………….. 14 Section 2: Cross‐border Livelihood Profiles …………………………..……………..………………………… 16 1. Introduction ……………………….……………………………………………………………….. 16 2. Filtu‐Dolo Ethiopia – Mandera Kenya Pastoral Livelihood Profile ……………..…..… 17 3. Ethiopia / Somalia
    [Show full text]